Next Article in Journal
Temporal Trends of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation over 12 Years: A High-Volume Single-Center Experience
Next Article in Special Issue
Open Partial Laryngectomies: History of Laryngeal Cancer Surgery
Previous Article in Journal
Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis in the White British and South Asian Populations in Selected Trusts in England 2001–2020: An Absence of Disparate Care and a Need for Specialist Centres
Previous Article in Special Issue
Post-Laryngectomy Voice Prosthesis Changes by Speech-Language Pathologists: Preliminary Results
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Post-Operative Infections in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: Risk Factors for Different Infection Sites

Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(17), 4969; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11174969
Submission received: 13 July 2022 / Revised: 17 August 2022 / Accepted: 19 August 2022 / Published: 24 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Head and Neck Surgery: Clinical Updates and Perspectives)

Abstract

:
Background: Post-operative infections in head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery represent a major problem and are associated with an important increase in mortality, morbidity, and burden on the healthcare system. The aim of this retrospective observational study was to evaluate post-operative infections in HNC surgery and to analyze risk factors, with a specific focus on different sites of infection. Methods: Clinical data about 488 HNC patients who underwent surgery were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for post-operative infections. Results: Post-operative infections were observed in 22.7% of cases. Respiratory and surgical site infections were the most common. Multiple site infections were observed in 3.9% of cases. Considering all infection sites, advanced stage, tracheotomy, and higher duration of surgery were risk factors at multivariate analysis. Median hospital stay was significantly longer in patients who had post-operative infection (38 vs. 9 days). Conclusions: Post-operative infections may negatively affect surgical outcomes. A correct identification of risk factors may help the physicians to prevent post-operative infections in HNC surgery.

1. Introduction

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are reported to be associated with an important increase in mortality, morbidity, and burden on the healthcare system, especially in the post-operative setting. In the clinical practice, the most frequent types of HAIs are: surgical site infection (SSI), bloodstream infection, respiratory infection, and urinary tract infection [1].
Post-operative HAIs in head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery represent a critical problem and may affect oncological results. Indeed, they can determine a delay in adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and/or chemotherapy (CT) [2]. Despite the use of prophylactic antibiotics and the best pre- and post-operative care, HAIs incidence is still high due to the expanding microbial resistance [3].
SSIs following head and neck oncological surgery are the main post-operative HAIs and range from 10 to 50% [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Respiratory infection after HNC surgery ranges between 7 and 40%, urinary tract infection between 2.1 and 6.1%, and bacteremia from 0.7 to 13.8% [2,22,23,24,25,26,27]. HAIs are associated with prolonged hospitalization, readmission rates, poor cosmetic results and mortality [2,3,18,22,24,27]. Consequently, direct costs rise [25].
Risk factors for SSIs have been analyzed in a number of studies and included higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, comorbidities, smoking, alcohol consumption, previous RT or CT, advanced tumor stage, longer duration of surgery, blood loss and/or anemia, hypoalbuminemia and/or malnutrition (weight loss), presence of tracheotomy, flap reconstruction, and clean-contaminated surgery [4,6,10,11,12,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,28]. Although different authors analyzed these risk factors, significant disagreements with heterogeneous results exist in the literature.
Only a few studies investigated risk factors for respiratory infections and identified age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), tumor stage, smoking, weight loss as significant factors for infections occurrence [2,22,23,24,27]. Only two studies evaluated risk factors for infections from different sites considered together (all HAIs) [2,22]. In particular, previous radiotherapy, anemia, salvage surgery, tracheotomy, longer surgery duration, microvascular reoperation < 72 h, and flap loss were identified as risks factors for HAIs [2,22]. Finally, to the best of our knowledge, risk factors for multiple site infections have never been investigated.
The aim of this retrospective observational study was to evaluate post-operative infections in HNC surgery and to analyze risk factors identifying the patients at higher risk, with a specific focus on different sites of infection.

2. Materials and Methods

The study sample included 488 patients who underwent HNC surgery at our Division between January 2015 and May 2022. Inclusion criteria were: age > 18 years, and surgery for cancer of oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands. Minor procedures, such as biopsies, were excluded from the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (protocol code 0021433, date of approval 26 February 2021). All the patients were contacted and provided written informed consent.
We collected the following clinical data: age, sex, tumor site, smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities (allergies, diabetes mellitus, COPD, chronic kidney disease—CKD, cirrhosis), chronic systemic corticosteroid and/or immunosuppressive therapy, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, previous RT and/or CT for head and neck cancer, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, type of surgical procedure (clean or clean-contaminated surgery), flap reconstruction, tracheotomy, duration of surgery, presence of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) or other central venous catheter (CVC), presence of nasogastric feeding tube, post-operative Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, pre- and postoperative hemoglobin (Hb), hospitalization length, and site of the infection (surgical site, respiratory system, urinary system, bloodstream, other sites). Antibiotic prophylaxis was performed in clean-contaminated surgery. Intravenous amoxicillin with clavulanic acid 2.2 g was usually used during surgical procedure and every 8 h for at least 3 days after surgery. Intravenous clarithromycin 500 mg was administered to patients who were allergic to amoxicillin.
HAIs are defined according to the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, until the 30th post-operative day [1].
All statistical analyses were carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 20.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test demonstrated a non-Gaussian distribution of variables, so non-parametric tests were used. A descriptive analysis of all data was performed, and they were reported as medians and interquartile range (IQR), or percentages. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess differences between groups in the mean of continuous variables, while the Chi-squared test was used for categorical variables. Logistic regression (forced entry method) was used for multivariate analysis. If less than 10 cases per each variable were present, multivariate analysis was not performed because of insufficient statistical power. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Median age was 66 years (IQR 15 years). Fifty-one percent of patients was older than 65 years. Median BMI was 24.44 (IQR 5.31). Table 1 and Table 2 report patient and tumor characteristics. In particular, 226 (46.3%) patients had an ASA score of 1 or 2, while 262 (53.7%) cases had an ASA score of 3 or 4. Tumors were diagnosed in early stage (I–II) in 53.2% of cases, whereas 46.8% of patients had an advanced tumor (stage III–IV).
Surgical treatments are highlighted in Table 3. Eighty-one (16.6%) patients went to ICU after surgery. ICU stay ranged between 1 and 3 days. Surgery was classified as clean in 83 (17.0%) cases and clean-contaminated in 405 (83%) cases. PICC/CVC was used in 190 (38.9%) patients, while nasogastric feeding tube was positioned in 269 (55.1%) cases.
Median duration of surgery was 195 min (IQR 210 min), and median hospital stay was 13 days (IQR 21 days). Median pre-operative Hb was 14.2 g/dL (IQR 2.0 g/dL), while it was 12.0 g/dL (IQR 2.8 g/dL) at first post-operative day.
Post-operative infections were observed in 111 (22.7%) patients, after a median time of 10 days (IQR 10.25 days). Respiratory infections were the most common (Figure 1). Moreover, multiple site infections were observed in 19 (3.9%) cases, with bacteremia and respiratory infection being the most frequent association. Other sites of infection included gastrointestinal tract (three cases) and male genital system (one case).
Significant risk factors for post-operative infection (all the sites) at univariate analyses were higher ASA score, advanced stage, longer duration of surgery, tracheotomy, clean-contaminated surgical procedure, flap reconstruction, ICU stay, lower post-operative Hb (first day after surgery), nasogastric feeding tube, and presence of PICC/CVC (p < 0.05). Median Hb at the days of infection diagnosis was 10.2 g/dL (IQR 2.4 g/dL), lower than levels at first post-operative day (1.8 g/dL lower on average). Table 4 reports the percentages of infections for each site and categorical risk factor, while Table 5 shows statistical significance for risk factors according to infection sites. Older patients had a higher risk of SSIs.
Multivariate analysis (logistic regression) was performed only considering all the infections, because there were too few cases for each infection site to perform statistical analysis. Since the presence of nasogastric feeding tube was significantly associated with the type of surgery (quite all the patients who underwent major clean-contaminated surgery had a feeding tube), it was removed from multivariate analysis. Significant risk factors for post-operative infection were advanced stage, tracheotomy, and longer duration of surgery (p < 0.05, Table 6).
Infections were observed in 10.9% and 36.0% of cases in patients with early (stage I–II) and advanced (stage III–IV) cancer, respectively (p = 0.048). Patients with tracheotomy had infection in 39.3% of cases, compared to 6.5% in those without tracheotomy (p = 0.039). Median duration of surgery was 320 and 150 min in patient with and without post-operative infection, respectively (p = 0.001). Median hospital stay was significantly longer in patients who had post-operative infection (38 vs. 9 days, p < 0.001, Figure 2).

4. Discussion

Post-operative infections represent an important issue in HNC surgery, leading to a longer hospital stay, a delay of adjuvant treatments, worse survival rates, and higher costs [2,25]. The increase of microbial resistance is worsening HAIs, reducing the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis. For example, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been emerging as a major cause of SSIs in HNC patients [3].
SSIs following HNC surgery are the main post-operative HAIs and range from 10 to 50% [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Respiratory infection, bacteremia, and urinary tract infection were observed in 7–40%, 2.1–6.1%, and 0.7–13.8% of cases, respectively [2,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Our study showed HAIs rates in agreement with the literature and located near lower range values. In particular, we observed SSIs in 9.2% of cases, respiratory infections in 12.5%, urinary tract infections in 1.4%, and bacteremia in 3.7%. Globally, we observed post-operative HAIs in 22.7% of patients. The heterogeneous results present in literature are due to different selection of patients in the studies. Indeed, some papers included only patients who underwent flap reconstruction, with a specific focus on free flaps. Since several studies identified flap reconstruction as a HAI risk factor, papers that included only patients who underwent reconstructive surgery reported a higher rate of post-operative infections [2,6,14].
Risk factors have been investigated for SSIs in several studies and for respiratory infections in some papers. However, there is no accordance among studies to identify the same risk factors. Concerning SSIs, the most reported risk factors were ASA score, comorbidities (e.g., diabetes mellitus), smoking, alcohol consumption, previous RT or CT, tumor stage, duration of surgery, blood loss and/or anemia, hypoalbuminemia and/or malnutrition (weight loss), tracheotomy, flap reconstruction, and clean-contaminated surgery [4,6,10,11,12,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,28]. Therefore, some variables related to the patient and others related to surgical procedure negatively impact on post-operative HAIs. In particular, malnutrition incidence in HNC patients ranges from 30% to 50% and together with surgical stress, lead to immunosuppression that results in a higher risk of infectious complications and a decrease in survival rates [19].
Our univariate analysis regrading all the infections showed that higher ASA score, tumor site (oral cavity and larynx/hypopharynx), advanced stage, presence of PICC/CVC or nasogastric feeding tube, clean-contaminated surgery, tracheotomy, flap reconstruction, higher duration of surgery, ICU stay, and lower post-operative Hb were potential risk factors. Multivariate analysis confirmed advanced stage, tracheotomy, and higher duration of surgery as risk factors for post-operative infections. The last two parameters were also identified as risk factors by Ramos-zayas et al. in a sample of 65 patients who underwent free flap reconstruction [2]. On the other hand, Tjoa et al. found that age > 65 years and clean-contaminated surgery were risk factors in a large sample of 715 patients who had flap reconstruction [22]. We did not find statistical significance for some clinical parameters, such as comorbidities, immunosuppression and previous RT and/or CT. Our data suggest that HNC surgery may be safe also for patients who underwent organ transplantation and were immunosuppressed. However, no definitive conclusion can be drawn because of small numbers.
Concerning infections of specific sites (surgical site, respiratory system, urinary tract, bloodstream), univariate analyses highlighted slightly different potential risk factors compare to all the infections. Our results about SSIs were in agreement with the literature. The main difference compared to all the infections was the lack of significance for ASA score, tumor site and ICU stay.
Respiratory infections had the same potential risk factors compared to SSIs, adding ICU stay. This is in agreement with the literature. Indeed, a recent meta-analysis showed a significant increase in the post-operative respiratory infections and sepsis in patients admitted to ICU compared with non-ICU setting [29].
Bacteremia and multiple site infections had similar risk factors. In particular, previous CT became significant, while post-operative anemia was not. Our study demonstrated that multiple site infections were more frequent in patients with higher ASA score, advanced tumor stage, previous CT, presence of PICC/CVC or nasogastric feeding tube, clean-contaminated surgery, tracheotomy, flap reconstruction, higher duration of surgery, and ICU stay.
According to literature, we found a longer hospitalization in patents with HAIs. In particular, median hospital stay was 38 days in patients who had post-operative infection, while it was 9 days in non-infected patients. As reported by Penel et al., post-operative infections with longer hospital stay lead to higher direct costs [25].
The strength of this study is the analysis of post-operative HAIs from different sites and the evaluation of multiple site infections. Indeed, at our knowledge, this is the first study that investigated risk factors for each site, including multiple infections. The main limit is the number of cases not sufficient for multivariate analysis for every infection site.
Further studies on large samples are mandatory to obtain reliable results from multivariate analyses. The exact identification of risk factors may help the physicians to prevent post-operative HAIs in HNC surgery.

5. Conclusions

Surgery represents one of the main treatments for HNC. However, post-operative infections may negatively affect surgical outcomes. Respiratory and surgical site infections are the most frequent infectious complications. Advanced stage, tracheotomy, and higher duration of surgery are risk factors considering all infection sites. Slight differences have been observed for specific anatomical sites. Future studies are necessary to identify risk factors exactly and thus help surgeons to reduce post-operative infections. In particular, higher attention should be paid to patients with greater risk, who may benefit from longer or different antibiotic prophylaxis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.P. and R.A.; methodology, G.R.; software, G.R.; validation, G.P. and G.R.; formal analysis, G.R.; investigation, G.R., E.C. and E.F.; data curation, G.R.; writing—original draft preparation, G.R. and E.C.; writing—review and editing, G.P., A.A., A.C. and R.A.; visualization, G.R.; supervision, R.A.; project administration, R.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of “AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino” (protocol code 0021433, date of approval 26 February 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Horan, T.C.; Andrus, M.; Dudeck, M.A. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am. J. Infect. Control 2008, 36, 309–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ramos-zayas, A.; López-medrano, F.; Urquiza-fornovi, I.; Zubillaga, I.; Gutiérrez, R.; Sánchez-aniceto, G.; Acero, J.; Almeida, F.; Galdona, A.; José Morán, M.; et al. The Impact of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Patients Undergoing Oncological Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Prospective Multicentre Study. Cancers 2021, 13, 2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lin, S.; Melki, S.; Lisgaris, M.V.; Ahadizadeh, E.N.; Zender, C.A. Post-operative MRSA infections in head and neck surgery. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2017, 38, 417–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Park, S.Y.; Kim, M.S.; Eom, J.S.; Lee, J.S.; Rho, Y.S. Risk factors and etiology of surgical site infection after radical neck dissection in patients with head and neck cancer. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2016, 31, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, J.I.; Kwon, M.; Roh, J.L.; Choi, J.; Choi, S.H.; Nam, S.; Kim, S. Postoperative hypoalbuminemia as a risk factor for surgical site infection after oral cancer surgery. Oral Dis. 2015, 21, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, C.H.; Wong, Y.K.; Wang, C.P.; Wang, C.C.; Jiang, R.S.; Lai, C.S.; Liu, S.A. Risk factors of recipient site infection in head and neck cancer patients undergoing pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2015, 272, 3475–3482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Skitarelic, N.; Morovic, M.; Manestar, D. Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean-contaminated head and neck oncological surgery. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2007, 35, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sato, J.; Goto, J.; Harahashi, A.; Murata, T.; Hata, H.; Yamazaki, Y.; Satoh, A.; Notani, K.I.; Kitagawa, Y. Oral health care reduces the risk of postoperative surgical site infection in inpatients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Support. Care Cancer 2011, 19, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. González-Márquez, R.; Rodrigo, J.P.; Nieto, C.S. Prognostic significance of postoperative wound infections after total laryngectomy. Head Neck 2012, 34, 1023–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, D.H.; Kim, S.Y.; Nam, S.Y.; Choi, S.H.; Choi, J.W.; Roh, J.L. Risk factors of surgical site infection in patients undergoing major oncological surgery for head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2011, 47, 528–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Candau-Alvarez, A.; Linares-Sicilia, M.J.; Dean-Ferrer, A.; Pérez-Navero, J.L. Role of culture of postoperative drainage fluid in the prediction of infection of the surgical site after major oncological operations of the head and neck. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2015, 53, 200–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kamizono, K.; Sakuraba, M.; Nagamatsu, S.; Miyamoto, S.; Hayashi, R. Statistical analysis of surgical site infection after head and neck reconstructive surgery. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2014, 21, 1700–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yang, C.H.; Chew, K.Y.; Solomkin, J.S.; Lin, P.Y.; Chiang, Y.C.; Kuo, Y.R. Surgical site infections among high-risk patients in clean-contaminated head and neck reconstructive surgery: Concordance with preoperative oral flora. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2013, 71 (Suppl. S1), S55–S60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Karakida, K.; Aoki, T.; Ota, Y.; Yamazaki, H.; Otsuru, M.; Takahashi, M.; Sakamoto, H.; Miyasaka, M. Analysis of risk factors for surgical-site infections in 276 oral cancer surgeries with microvascular free-flap reconstructions at a single university hospital. J. Infect. Chemother. 2010, 16, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cole, R.R.; Robbins, K.T.; Cohen, J.I.; Wolf, P.F. A predictive model for wound sepsis in oncologic surgery of the head and neck. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 1987, 96, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gan, C.; Wang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Wang, K.; Sun, B.; Wang, M.; Zhu, F. Risk factors for surgical site infection in head and neck cancer. Support. Care Cancer 2022, 30, 2735–2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Penel, N.; Lefebvre, D.; Fournier, C.; Sarini, J.; Kara, A.; Lefebvre, J.L. Risk factors for wound infection in head and neck cancer surgery: A prospective study. Head Neck 2001, 23, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Goyal, N.; Emerick, K.S.; Deschler, D.G.; Lin, D.T.; Yarlagadda, B.B.; Rich, D.L.; Durand, M.L. Risk factors for surgical site infection after supraclavicular flap reconstruction in patients undergoing major head and neck surgery. Head Neck 2016, 38, 1615–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Son, H.J.; Roh, J.L.; Choi, S.H.; Nam, S.Y.; Kim, S.Y. Nutritional and hematologic markers as predictors of risk of surgical site infection in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing major oncologic surgery. Head Neck 2018, 40, 596–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hirakawa, H.; Hasegawa, Y.; Hanai, N.; Ozawa, T.; Hyodo, I.; Suzuki, M. Surgical site infection in clean-contaminated head and neck cancer surgery: Risk factors and prognosis. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2013, 270, 1115–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ogihara, H.; Takeuchi, K.; Majima, Y. Risk factors of postoperative infection in head and neck surgery. Auris. Nasus. Larynx 2009, 36, 457–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tjoa, T.; Rathi, V.K.; Goyal, N.; Yarlagadda, B.B.; Barshak, M.B.; Rich, D.L.; Emerick, K.S.; Lin, D.T.; Deschler, D.G.; Durand, M.L. Pneumonia, urinary tract infection, bacteremia, and Clostridioides difficile infection following major head and neck free and pedicled flap surgeries. Oral Oncol. 2021, 122, 105541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Damian, D.; Esquenazi, J.; Duvvuri, U.; Johnson, J.T.; Sakai, T. Incidence, outcome, and risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications in head and neck cancer surgery patients with free flap reconstructions. J. Clin. Anesth. 2016, 28, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, Y.; Di, Y.; Fu, S. Risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia among patients undergoing major oncological surgery for head and neck cancer. Front. Med. 2017, 11, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Penel, N.; Lefebvre, J.L.; Cazin, J.L.; Clisant, S.; Neu, J.C.; Dervaux, B.; Yazdanpanah, Y. Additional direct medical costs associated with nosocomial infections after head and neck cancer surgery: A hospital-perspective analysis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2008, 37, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ong, S.K.; Morton, R.P.; Kolbe, J.; Whitlock, R.M.L.; McIvor, N.P. Pulmonary complications following major head and neck surgery with tracheostomy: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics. Arch. Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg. 2004, 130, 1084–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Semenov, Y.R.; Starmer, H.M.; Gourin, C.G. The effect of pneumonia on short-term outcomes and cost of care after head and neck cancer surgery. Laryngoscope 2012, 122, 1994–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Liu, S.A.; Wong, Y.K.; Poon, C.K.; Wang, C.C.; Wang, C.P.; Tung, K.C. Risk factors for wound infection after surgery in primary oral cavity cancer patients. Laryngoscope 2007, 117, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mashrah, M.A.; Aldhohrah, T.; Abdelrehem, A.; Sabri, B.; Ahmed, H.; Al-Rawi, N.H.; Yu, T.; Zhao, S.; Wang, L.; Ge, L. Postoperative care in ICU versus non-ICU after head and neck free-flap surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2022, 12, e053667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sites of post-operative infections (percentages on 488 patients).
Figure 1. Sites of post-operative infections (percentages on 488 patients).
Jcm 11 04969 g001
Figure 2. Median hospital stay according to infection status. Outliers are present in the figure as asterisks and circles.
Figure 2. Median hospital stay according to infection status. Outliers are present in the figure as asterisks and circles.
Jcm 11 04969 g002
Table 1. Patients’ characteristics.
Table 1. Patients’ characteristics.
Patient and Tumor CharacteristicsN° (%)
Sex
 Male381 (78.1)
 Female107 (21.9)
BMI
 Low (<18.5)24 (4.9)
 Normal (18.5–25)246 (50.4)
 High (>25)218 (44.7)
Smoking
 Never104 (21.3)
 Former211 (43.2)
 Active173 (35.5)
Alcohol consumption *243 (49.8)
Allergies **99 (20.3)
COPD64 (13.1)
Cirrhosis13 (2.7)
CKD18 (3.7)
Diabetes mellitus64 (13.1)
Previous transplantation ***6 (1.2)
Chronic systemic corticosteroid therapy ****16 (3.3)
Immunosuppression3 (0.6)
Previous radiation therapy118 (24.2)
Previous chemotherapy71 (14.5)
ASA score
 144 (9.0)
 2187 (38.3)
 3235 (48.2)
 422 (4.5)
* Refers to current alcohol consumption (>2 drinks per day for men and >1 drink per day for women). ** Refers to any type of allergy (environmental, drugs, foods) proven by prick tests and/or serological exams. *** Three patients had solid organ transplantation and underwent immunosuppression, while three patients had stem cell transplantation. **** For allergic diseases (13 cases; prednisone 5–10 mg per day for more than 30 days/year) or previous solid organ transplantation (3 cases; prednisone 25 mg per day). BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists.
Table 2. Tumor characteristics.
Table 2. Tumor characteristics.
Patient and Tumor CharacteristicsN° (%)
Tumor site
 Nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses36 (7.4)
 Nasopharynx1 (0.2)
 Oral cavity145 (29.6)
 Oropharynx57 (11.7)
 Larynx177 (36.3)
 Hypopharynx23 (4.7)
 Salivary glands37 (7.6)
 Unknown primary12 (2.5)
T
 028 (5.7)
 1199 (40.8)
 2102 (20.9)
 393 (19.1)
 466 (13.5)
N
 0344 (70.5)
 144 (9.0)
 276 (15.6)
 324 (4.9)
Stage
 I190 (38.9)
 II70 (14.3)
 III94 (19.3)
 IV134 (27.5)
T, tumor; N, node.
Table 3. Surgical procedures.
Table 3. Surgical procedures.
SurgeryN° (%)
Ethmoido-maxillectomy6 (12.3)
Partial maxillectomy25 (51.2)
Subtotal/total maxillectomy10 (2.0)
Partial glossectomy43 (8.8)
Hemiglossectomy27 (5.5)
Subtotal/total glossectomy8 (1.6)
Glossectomy with mandibulectomy10 (2.0)
Oral floor cancer removal16 (3.3)
Cheek mucosa cancer removal10 (2.0)
Lip cancer removal11 (2.3)
Retromolar trigone cancer removal9 (1.8)
Partial pharyngectomy43 (8.8)
Cordectomy65 (13.3)
Partial laryngectomy41 (8.4)
Total laryngectomy/pharyngolaryngectomy82 (16.8)
Parotidectomy31 (6.4)
Submandibular gland cancer removal2 (0.4)
Neck dissection263 (53.9)
Reconstruction with pedicled flap70 (14.3)
Reconstruction with free flap30 (6.1)
Tracheotomy242 (49.6)
Table 4. Percentage of post-operative infection for each risk factor in different sites.
Table 4. Percentage of post-operative infection for each risk factor in different sites.
Risk FactorsAll InfectionsSurgical Site
Infections
Respiratory
Infections
BloodstreamMultiple Site
Infection
Age > 65 years (yes/no)23.7/21.87.2/11.314.4/10.54.0/3.33.6/4.2
Sex (male/female)23.8/18.79.7/7.512.9/11.23.9/2.84.2/2.8
Smoking (active/former or never)25.4/21.311.5/7.912.1/12.74.6/3.24.0/3.8
Alcohol consumption25.9/19.610.7/7.714.4/10.63.3/4.14.9/2.8
BMI (high/low or normal)22.0/23.36.9/11.112.3/12.63.2/4.13.2/4.4
Allergies (yes/no)28.3/21.311.1/8.715.1/11.85.0/3.33.0/4.1
COPD (yes/no)21.9/22.910.9/8.912.5/12.51.6/4.04.7/3.8
Cirrhosis (yes/no)30.8/22.57.7/9.315.4/12.47.7/3.60.0/4.0
CKD (yes/no)11.1/23.25.5/9.40.0/12.95.5/3.60.0/4.0
Diabetes mellitus (yes/no)26.6/22.29.4/9.218.7/11.53.1/3.86.2/3.5
Previous transplantation (yes/no)33.3/22.60.0/9.30.0/12.616.7/3.50.0/3.9
Chronic corticosteroid therapy (yes/no)37.5/22.26.2/9.318.7/12.36.2/3.60.0/4.0
Immunosuppression (yes/no)33.3/22.70.0/9.30.0/12.60.0/3.70.0/3.9
Previous radiation therapy (yes/no)17.8/24.37.6/9.710.2/13.25.1/3.25.9/3.2
Previous chemotherapy (yes/no)26.8/22.18.4/9.316.9/11.78.4/2.98.4/3.1
ASA score (III–IV/I–II)26.3/18.69.5/8.814.5/10.25.3/1.85.3/2.2
Stage (advanced/early)36.1/10.813.5/5.420.4/5.45.6/1.96.1/1.9
PICC/CVC (yes/no)36.8/13.713.7/6.421.0/7.08.4/1.07.9/2.0
Nasogastric feeding tube (yes/no)35.3/7.315.2/1.818.6/5.05.6/1.46.3/0.9
Surgical procedure (clean-cont./clean)26.7/3.611.1/0.014.6/2.44.4/0.04.7/0.0
Tracheotomy (yes/no)39.2/6.514.5/4.122.7/2.47.0/0.47.4/0.4
Flap reconstruction (yes/no)42.7/17.918.7/6.926.0/9.25.2/3.38.3/2.8
ICU stay (yes/no)45.7/18.214.8/8.125.9/9.89.9/2.49.9/2.7
BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; PICC, peripherally inserted central catheter; CVC, central venous catheter; ICU, intensive care unit.
Table 5. Risk factors for different sites of post-operative infections (p values at univariate analyses).
Table 5. Risk factors for different sites of post-operative infections (p values at univariate analyses).
Risk FactorsAll InfectionsSurgical Site
Infections
Respiratory
Infections
BloodstreamMultiple Site
Infection
Age0.8390.015 *0.1470.3640.468
Sex0.2580.4800.6490.5830.510
Smoking (active)0.2940.1860.8580.4160.897
Alcohol consumption0.0950.2610.2050.6440.235
BMI0.5650.1400.6850.8070.865
Allergies0.1410.4670.3720.4210.619
COPD0.8580.6111.0000.3330.725
Cirrhosis0.4840.8470.7500.4380.462
CKD0.2300.5840.1020.6680.384
Diabetes mellitus0.4350.9640.1050.7970.296
Previous transplantation0.5340.4320.3520.0900.620
Chronic corticosteroid therapy0.1520.6760.4420.5800.413
Immunosuppression0.6610.5800.5110.7340.727
Previous radiation therapy0.1410.4920.3790.3550.189
Previous chemotherapy0.3830.8080.2250.021 *0.032 *
ASA score0.014 *0.7820.2150.001 *0.050 *
Tumor site0.008 *0.4580.5360.9850.893
Stage<0.001 *<0.001 *<0.001 *0.1050.003 *
PICC/CVC<0.001 *0.007 *<0.001 *<0.001 *<0.001 *
Nasogastric feeding tube<0.001 *<0.001 *<0.001 *0.014 *0.002 *
Type of surgical procedure<0.001 *0.001 *0.002 *0.050 *0.044 *
Tracheotomy<0.001 *<0.001 *<0.001 *<0.001 *<0.001 *
Flap reconstruction<0.001 *<0.001 *<0.001 *0.3810.012 *
Duration of surgery<0.001 *<0.001 *<0.001 *<0.001 *<0.001 *
ICU stay<0.001 *0.057<0.001 *0.001 *0.002 *
Pre-operative Hb0.4400.8550.2550.8010.993
Post-operative Hb (1st day)<0.001 *0.006 *<0.001 *0.1860.182
* p < 0.05 (Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and Chi-squared test for categorical variables). BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; PICC, peripherally inserted central catheter; CVC, central venous catheter; ICU, intensive care unit; Hb, hemoglobin.
Table 6. Multivariate analysis regarding risk factors for post-operative infection (all sites).
Table 6. Multivariate analysis regarding risk factors for post-operative infection (all sites).
Risk Factorp-Value
ASA score0.227
Tumor site0.652
Stage0.048 *
PICC/CVC0.219
Type of surgical procedure0.203
Tracheotomy0.039 *
Flap reconstruction0.965
Duration of surgery0.001 *
ICU stay0.402
Post-operative Hb (1st day)0.224
* p < 0.05 (logistic regression). ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; PICC, peripherally inserted central catheter; CVC, central venous catheter; ICU, intensive care unit; Hb, hemoglobin.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pecorari, G.; Riva, G.; Albera, A.; Cravero, E.; Fassone, E.; Canale, A.; Albera, R. Post-Operative Infections in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: Risk Factors for Different Infection Sites. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 4969. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11174969

AMA Style

Pecorari G, Riva G, Albera A, Cravero E, Fassone E, Canale A, Albera R. Post-Operative Infections in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: Risk Factors for Different Infection Sites. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(17):4969. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11174969

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pecorari, Giancarlo, Giuseppe Riva, Andrea Albera, Ester Cravero, Elisabetta Fassone, Andrea Canale, and Roberto Albera. 2022. "Post-Operative Infections in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: Risk Factors for Different Infection Sites" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 17: 4969. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11174969

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop