Next Article in Journal
A Proliferation-Inducing Ligand and B-Cell Activating Factor Are Upregulated in Patients with Essential Thrombocythemia
Previous Article in Journal
Dermoscopic Features of Different Forms of Cutaneous Mastocytosis: A Systematic Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Oral Health in Breast Cancer Women with Vitamin D Deficiency: A Machine Learning Study

1
Dentistry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro “Magna Graecia”, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
2
Dentistry Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, 28100 Novara, Italy
3
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro “Magna Graecia”, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
4
Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, 28100 Novara, Italy
5
Translational Medicine, Dipartimento Attività Integrate Ricerca e Innovazione (DAIRI), Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, 15121 Alessandria, Italy
6
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Neurosciences, ASST Carlo Poma, 46100 Mantova, Italy
7
Innovative Research Laboratory for Wound Healing, Health Sciences Department, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(16), 4662; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164662
Submission received: 30 June 2022 / Revised: 24 July 2022 / Accepted: 8 August 2022 / Published: 9 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)

Abstract

:
Breast cancer (BC) survivors treated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) commonly show several pathological issues, including poor oral health, bone health impairment, and vitamin D deficiency. However, to date, oral health issues in BC survivors treated with AIs have been poorly investigated and their relationship with vitamin D deficiency are far from being understood. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between oral health and vitamin D status in BC survivors undergoing treatment with AIs through a machine learning approach. In this cross-sectional study, we included post-menopausal BC women with vitamin D deficiency undergoing AIs therapy. The outcome measures were the following: oral health indexes as the Decayed, Missing, and Filled Permanent Teeth Index (DMFT); serum levels of 25(OH)D3; Bone Mineral Density (BMD); and the diagnosis of osteoporosis. We included 41 post-menopausal BC women, mean aged 66.10 ± 8.47 years, with mean serum levels of vitamin D of 14.63 ± 6.62 ng/mL. Furthermore, 56.10% of patients had a diagnosis of osteoporosis and 36.59% were osteopenic. DMFT was significantly related to smoking (p-value = 0.005) and dental floss use (p-value = 0.001). There was a significant correlation between DMFT and vitamin D levels (Pearson’s r: −0.73; p-value = 0.001). The regression machine learning model showed that vitamin D status and the use of dental floss were the most relevant variables in terms of correlation with DMFT. In conclusion, vitamin D deficiency, inadequate use of dental floss, and smoking had a negative impact on oral health in BC women. Thus, vitamin D deficiency screening and supplementation and a prompt oral rehabilitation plan should be suggested and implemented in the complex treatment framework of BC survivors undergoing treatment with AIs.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide [1], albeit the incidence has declined during the last few decades [2,3]. Indeed, the death rate has dropped from its peak for female breast cancer by 40% [1], probably due to an adequate combination of early screening programs and improvement in adjuvant therapy, such as the aromatase inhibitors (AIs)—commonly used in estrogen-positive tumors to prevent recurrence [4]. These drugs aim to reduce the effects of estrogens on breast tissue [5,6], but could induce several adverse events, including a negative impact on bone health [7,8]. The aromatase enzyme is expressed not only in BC tissue but also in bone tissue [9], thus, AIs could lead to a lower bone mineral density (BMD) with a resulting increased risk of incident fragility fractures, leading to the well-known condition defined as cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) [10,11]. Therefore, an adequate screening for bone health status in BC women undergoing AIs treatment should be recommended to define an appropriate anti-osteoporotic drug therapy, including oral bisphosphonates (BPs), zoledronic acid, or denosumab [12,13].
In this context, previous studies showed that BC survivors treated with AIs have worse subjective oral health, periodontal health, and oral health-related quality of life [14,15]. Hence, bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws [16], oral lesions [15], caries [17], and periodontal tissue diseases (e.g., gingivitis and periodontitis) [18,19] may occur in a higher percentage of BC women undergoing cancer treatments and anti-osteoporotic drugs. Similarly, vitamin D plays a key role in different fields of medicine, including dentistry, and acts through several mechanisms, including cellular proliferation and differentiation, cell maturation, and innate immune system response [20]. Moreover, high serum vitamin D3 levels may be strongly associated with an increase in the overall survival rate of BC patients [21,22], and this could be related to the fact that both vitamin D3 and vitamin D receptors (VDR) are involved in BC pathogenesis. Thus VDR, which is expressed at a systemic level, may act as a negative tumor suppressor regulator in physiological conditions and could be impaired in cancer patients, thereby promoting cancer transformation and other cancer-related sequelae, including bone health impairment [23,24].
In this context, previous studies suggested that vitamin D could promote the synthesis of antimicrobial peptides and inhibit antigen-induced T-cell proliferation as well as cytokine production (e.g., interleukin (IL)-2 and interferon (IFN)-γ), resulting in a relevant anti-inflammatory effect [25,26]. Furthermore, vitamin D supplementation seems to increase the serum concentration of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 and decrease pro-inflammatory cytokines like tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α [27,28,29]. In light of these anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties, several studies showed a correlation between low vitamin D serum levels and periodontal disease (PD) [29,30,31]. PD is one of the most common chronic inflammatory diseases affecting the tissues surrounding the teeth and is characterized by local tissue destruction initiated by the exposure to bacterial plaque and their metabolic bioproducts [32]. In vitro studies have shown that vitamin D3 might induce the expression of the antimicrobial peptide, LL-37, in cultured gingival epithelial cells, and that vitamin D supplementation leads to a reduction in the viability of the periodontal pathogen, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, on the surface of the cells [33,34]. Moreover, the same in vitro studies suggested that LL-37, induced by vitamin D, exhibits antimicrobial activity against Porphyromonas gingivalis and other pathogens associated with PD pathogenesis [33,34]. In this context, Freudenheim et al. [35] demonstrated that PD might significantly increase BC risk and suggested a possible role of the oral microbiome in BC pathogenesis and prevention.
Albeit the negative influence on quality of life in BC survivors [36], chronic oral diseases are frequently neglected issues in these women and, considering the higher incidence of anti-osteoporotic drugs-related oral sequelae in cancer patients [37], a preventive oral health evaluation should be performed before starting pharmacological CTIBL treatment (see Figure 1).
The correlation among oral health, bone health, and vitamin D status has been previously investigated in different conditions [29,30,31]. However, to date, the pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning this linkage in BC survivors has not been widely investigated yet. In light of these considerations, this study aimed to evaluate the correlation between oral hygiene and vitamin D status in BC survivors treated with AIs through a machine learning approach.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Participants

In this observational cross-sectional study, we included BC women over a 12-month period (April 2021–March 2022) that were referred to the Dentistry Unit of the University Hospital “Maggiore della Carità” of Novara, Italy. The inclusion criteria were the following: (i) BC women in post-menopausal status; (ii) vitamin D deficiency ([25(OHvit.D] < 30 ng(mL); (iii) ongoing AIs therapy; and (iv) understanding and signing the informed consent. The exclusion criteria were the following ones: (i) age < 50 years old; (ii) previous fragility fractures; (iii) treatment with corticosteroids, immunoglobulin, or immunosuppressive drugs; (iv) major concurrent diseases; (v) fully edentulous patients; and (vi) diagnosis of COVID-19.
The study was approved by the Local Ethic Committee (CE n. 392-61/10) and respected the Declaration of Helsinki, with pertinent National and International regulatory requirements. All participants were asked to carefully read and sign an informed consent, taking precautions to protect the privacy of patients. Lastly, the study was performed in accordance with the “Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology” (STROBE) Guidelines for cross-sectional studies.

2.2. Outcome Measures

The following demographic and anamnestic data were collected: age, body mass index (BMI), smoking habit, BC grading, radiotherapy, hormone therapy, chemotherapy, breast cancer related-lymphedema; axillary web syndrome, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) positivity, and percentage of Ki-67 protein (Ki-67).
The following data regarding bone health were also assessed: serum levels of 25(OH)D3 (ng/mL), serum calcium (mg/dL), serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) (pg/mL), lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD), LS Tscore, LS Zscore, femoral neck (FN) BMD, FN Tscore, FN Zscore (through the dual X-ray absorptiometry, DXA), diagnosis of osteoporosis, and diagnosis of osteopenia.
Furthermore, all the participants underwent an oral health specialist evaluation in order to assess the following outcome measures: the Decayed, Missing, and Filled Permanent Teeth Index (DMFT) [38], to assess dental caries prevalence as well as dental treatment needs; the Oral Hygiene Index (OHI) [39], for the presence of debris/stain and calculus on the dental elements; the Plaque Control and Record Index (PCR) [40], to assess the presence of plaque on the dental elements; the Periodontal Screening and Recording Index (PSR), to assess periodontal status; the Winkel Tongue Coating Index (WTCI) [41], to evaluate the amount of tongue coating.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

A statistical analysis was performed using R (v3.5.2 R Core Team, Vienna, Austria). The continuous variables are presented as means ± standard deviations, and the categorical variables are expressed as counts (percentages). The Shapiro–Wilk test was performed to assess the distribution of all continuous data. We related all the dichotomous variables to the DMFT through a logistic regression analysis. Regarding continuous data, Pearson’s correlation coefficients and regression analyses assessed associations and correlations regarding both bone and oral health status and clinical and demographic features of the study participants. A cut-off p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Furthermore, a random forest regression model, as a machine learning approach, was conducted to estimate the importance of variables based on how best or worse the prediction would be if one or more variables are removed, thereby weighting the elimination of predictor variables. In this context, the Gini Variable Importance estimates the importance of individual predictors via the changes in each node impurities at each split in each tree of the random forest. This Gini importance or mean decrease in the impurity of the node is the difference between impurities of a node, with or without a variable in the model, and so the weighted sum of the impurities in the two descendent nodes. Thus, we analyzed dichotomous variables as a measure of the importance of characteristics in the random forest, with there being an inherent imbalance towards continuous variables, or ordinal variables with multiple categories, so we dichotomized vitamin D using 20 ng/mL as a cut-off.

3. Results

Out of 46 subjects, 5 did not match the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were excluded; thus, 41 post-menopausal BC women (mean aged 66.1 ± 8.47 years) were included in the final analysis. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients enrolled are summarized in Table 1.
The cohort showed a mean serum level of 25(OH)vitamin D of 14.63 ± 6.62 (ng/mL), a mean LS BMD of 0.92 ± 0.19 g/cm2, and a FN BMD of 0.74 ± 0.1 g/cm2. Moreover, 56.10% of the patients included in the study had osteoporosis and 36.59% had osteopenia. For further details about bone health, see Table 2.
Oral hygiene status was reported in Table 3.
Two-thirds of the participants reported use a manual toothbrush, less than half used dental floss, and only a quarter used the tooth cleaner. The DMFT index had an average value of 17.44 ± 6.76. Regarding the PSR index assessment, only 4 patients (9.76%) had normal periodontal health status, 10 (24.39%) had gingivitis, 22 (53.66%) had moderate periodontitis, and 5 (12.2) had severe periodontitis.
Therefore, we performed a correlation analysis that relates hither DMFT to the dichotomous variables for a logistic regression. The increase in the DMFT is related to smoking (p-value = 0.005), whereas a decrease in the score is significantly related to the use of the dental floss (p-value = 0.001). The results of the logistic regression between the DMFT, oral health habits, and BC characteristics are shown in Table 4.
Lastly, we performed a correlation for the continuous anthropometric, oral, and bone health variables with the DMFT. We demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between DMFT and 25(OH)vitamin D serum levels with a Pearson’s r of −0.73 (p-value = 0.001). For further details, see Table 5.
To weigh the influence of each variable on the DMFT score, we performed a Random Forest Regression Model, generating 66 trees, with a test Mean Square Error of 0.88, an Out-of-Bag Error of 0.74, and, lastly, an R2 = 0.716. After dichotomizing the vitamin D values as less than or greater than 20, we have ranked the variables according to the mean decrease in accuracy and increase in node purity at each split of random forest generation. Therefore, we reported through a regression machine learning model that the following most important variables are vitamin D serum levels and the use of dental floss.

4. Discussion

Oral health in BC survivors is often a neglected issue with relevant implications in terms of disability and poor quality of life. This point could have relevant clinical implications considering that most BC survivors are treated with AIs and should undergo a pharmacological anti-resorptive treatment. These drugs may have a negative impact on oral health in the general cancer population; therefore, these patients should be screened for oral health pathological conditions and eventually treated to prevent the occurrence of even worse disabling sequelae. In this scenario, this cross-sectional study aimed to assess the correlation among bone health, vitamin D deficiency, and oral hygiene, and showed through a machine learning approach a possible correlation among bone and oral health with vitamin D deficiency in BC women undergoing AIs.
Our findings highlighted a high prevalence of osteoporosis (56.10%) and osteopenia (36.59%), and a prevalence of periodontitis of 65.8%, which is significantly higher than the general population [42]. These data are in line with a recent meta-analysis showing that post-menopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia exhibit greater loss of periodontal attachment compared with women with normal bone mineral density [43]. The authors suggested that periodontal disease might significantly increase the risk of BC by 1.22-fold [43], which is likely due to the immune response to oral bacterial flora that might increase systemic inflammation and oxidative stress with negative implications in the tumorigenesis process [44].
On the other hand, a significant correlation between DMFT and smoking subjects (p-value = 0.005) has been shown in accordance with previous studies, highlighting the detrimental consequences of smoking on oral hygiene [45,46]. However, it should be noted that smoking could also have a negative impact on BMD. Furthermore, the most recent joint position statement of interdisciplinary cancer and bone societies integrated smoking in the risk factor algorithm to tailor pharmacological management of CTIBL in patients receiving AIs [47].
Taken together, our results emphasized the role of a healthy lifestyle behavior, including smoking cessation in the comprehensive management of BC patients. These results suggested intriguing implications in a comprehensive counseling approach, thereby improving awareness of BC patients about the importance of lifestyle medicine in overall well-being of patients with cancer and promoting not only better oral health, but also bone health.
Furthermore, dental floss has been associated with DMFT scores (p-value = 0.001), suggesting that good oral hygiene practices (e.g., using dental floss) should definitely be implemented in the management of BC patients. Indeed, oral hygiene plays a crucial role in BC women receiving AIs, since growing evidence underlines the need for anti-resorptive drugs preventing CTIBL.
Intriguingly, a regression machine learning model confirmed the strict correlation between DMFT scores with the use of dental floss and smoking habits. In recent years, a growing interest has been rising in machine learning solutions, considering that these statistical approaches might have a crucial role in developing self-improving technological models. To better characterize the role of different variables in BC patients, machine learning-based statistical models have already been successfully integrated into the most recent approaches for oncologic patients [48,49,50]. In this scenario, novel multivariant statistical methods might improve correlation assessments by including several groups of continuous variables and clustering the study participants through a machine learning model [51,52].
Interestingly, our regression machine learning model analysis highlighted that vitamin D serum levels have been associated with higher weight of influence on the DMFT score. In the last few decades, the nutritional consequences of vitamin D deficiency on periodontal health represented a matter of interest [20,53,54,55]. By a recent systematic review with meta-analysis, Machado et al. [53] reported that patients with chronic periodontitis had lower serum levels of vitamin D than periodontally healthy patients. The exact mechanics by which vitamin D may influence periodontal status is still unknown; however, Gao et al. [54] recently showed that the human cationic antimicrobial protein of 18 kDa (hCAP-18)/LL-37 expression might be induced by vitamin D and Porphyromonas gingivalis-LPS, supporting that the vitamin D pathway is likely to exist in both human gingival fibroblasts and periodontal ligament cells and might play a role in the immune defense of periodontal soft tissues.
On the other hand, vitamin D has widely documented effects on bone health management, playing a key role in both non-pharmacological and pharmacological osteoporosis interventions [56]. In this context, osteoporosis is a systemic condition affecting the whole skeletal system with potential implications for bone structures of the jawbones and alveolar bone in patients, such as cancer survivors at higher risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw [57]. In addition, the previously reported close link between oral health status and osteoporosis might be partly explained by systemic inflammation that characterizes both conditions. In this scenario, the effects of vitamin D on immune systems are widely accepted, and several reports underline the role of vitamin D in inflammation downregulation. In particular, vitamin D might promote the upregulation of MAP kinases and inhibit the NF-kB signaling pathway, with crucial implications for cytokine serum levels, the prostaglandin inflammation pathway, and immune cells [58,59]. Moreover, recent studies highlighted that B cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages express VDR and might be selectively targeted by vitamin D [60,61]. In this scenario, the effects of vitamin D in systemic inflammation is currently considered an important hallmark in BC patients [62]. Therefore, vitamin D’s positive effects in immune regulation might have not only a positive role in oral health management and bone health, but also in the downregulation of inflammatory mediators that promote tumor growth or risk of recurrence [61,62]. Concurrently, periodontitis and gingivitis have been related to increases in immune response and systemic inflammation [63,64].
Therefore, our findings might support the need for vitamin D supplementation in BC patients, not only to improve bone health and to prevent CITBL, but also to reduce periodontitis and gingivitis risks, with crucial implications on systemic inflammation and patients’ HRQoL.
In line with these considerations, oral hygiene screening should be effectively integrated in the comprehensive management of BC survivors, as is already performed for patients with disabling neurological conditions who need prompt oral rehabilitation [65,66]. Furthermore, a specific assessment of BC survivors at high risk of oral health issues should include patients with hypovitaminosis D, smokers, and those not using dental floss. This screening might have a relevant role in reducing sanitary costs and focusing health care resources for a patient-tailored oral rehabilitation intervention.
However, we are aware that this study is not free from limitations. First, we had a small sample, probably due to the monocentric study design and to the strict eligibility criteria. Second, there is a lack of data on the subcomponents of the DMFT index and on other potential confounding factors (e.g., nutritional status, physical activity, etc.) that might influence the outcomes. Lastly, we did not provide data on the panoramic X-ray images of these patients, albeit it could have been interesting to assess the BMD also using the radio-morphometric indices of the mandible [67,68,69] and comparing these findings with the DXA examinations.

5. Conclusions

Taken together, the results of this cross-sectional study underlined a relevant correlation between vitamin D serum levels and oral health in BC women treated with AIs through a regression machine learning model. Furthermore, vitamin D deficiency, inadequate use of dental floss, and smoking had a negative impact on oral health in a cohort of post-menopausal BC women. In this scenario, we could recommend that the comprehensive screening and treatment framework known as “oral rehabilitation” should be included in the complex multidisciplinary management of BC survivors to reduce disabling sequalae occurrence and improve the HRQoL of these women. This could have relevant clinical implications and might pave the way to the development of a self-improving machine learning algorithm to better address the need for a tailored and multidisciplinary management model of BC survivors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.F., M.M. and A.d.S.; methodology, M.I. and A.d.S.; validation, M.F., M.M. and L.L.; formal analysis, N.M.; investigation, M.F., M.M., L.L. and A.d.S.; data curation, N.M. and L.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.F. and M.M.; writing—review and editing, M.I. and A.d.S.; visualization, N.M., L.L., A.A., D.C., V.A., L.F., F.R. and A.G.; supervision, M.M. and A.d.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Local Ethics Committee (CE n. 392-61/10).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Dataset is available on request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Sabrina Pasqua for her support in this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019, 69, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Parkin, D.M.; Bray, F.I.; Devesa, S.S. Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. Eur. J. Cancer 2001, 37 (Suppl. S8), S4–S66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. DeSantis, C.; Ma, J.; Bryan, L.; Jemal, A. Breast cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2014, 64, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Berry, D.A.; Cronin, K.A.; Plevritis, S.K.; Fryback, D.G.; Clarke, L.; Zelen, M.; Mandelblatt, J.S.; Yakovlev, A.Y.; Habbema, J.D.; Feuer, E.J. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 353, 1784–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mirza, F.S. Management of bone disease in patients undergoing hormonal therapy for breast cancer. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. N. Am. 2011, 40, 549–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cuzick, J.; Sestak, I.; Baum, M.; Buzdar, A.; Howell, A.; Dowsett, M.; Forbes, J.F.; ATAC/LATTE Investigators. Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10-year analysis of the ATAC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010, 11, 1135–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rachner, T.D.; Coleman, R.; Hadji, P.; Hofbauer, L.C. Bone health during endocrine therapy for cancer. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018, 6, 901–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rachner, T.D.; Göbel, A.; Jaschke, N.P.; Hofbauer, L.C. Challenges in Preventing Bone Loss Induced by Aromatase Inhibitors. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 105, 3122–3133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fabian, C.J. The what, why and how of aromatase inhibitors: Hormonal agents for treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2007, 61, 2051–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Eastell, R.; Adams, J.; Clack, G.; Howell, A.; Cuzick, J.; Mackey, J.; Beckmann, M.W.; Coleman, R.E. Long-term effects of anastrozole on bone mineral density: 7-year results from the ATAC trial. Ann. Oncol. 2011, 22, 857–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Goss, P.E.; Ingle, J.N.; Martino, S.; Robert, N.J.; Muss, H.B.; Piccart, M.J.; Castiglione, M.; Tu, D.; Shepherd, L.E.; Pritchard, K.I.; et al. Randomized trial of letrozole following tamoxifen as extended adjuvant therapy in receptor-positive breast cancer: Updated findings from NCIC CTG MA.17. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2005, 7, 1262–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. De Sire, A.; Lippi, L.; Venetis, K.; Morganti, S.; Sajjadi, E.; Curci, C.; Ammendolia, A.; Criscitiello, C.; Fusco, N.; Invernizzi, M. Efficacy of Antiresorptive Drugs on Bone Mineral Density in Post-Menopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Aromatase Inhibitors: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front. Oncol. 2022, 21, 829875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rizzoli, R.; Body, J.J.; DeCensi, A.; Reginster, J.Y.; Piscitelli, P.; Brandi, M.L. Guidance for the prevention of bone loss and fractures in postmenopausal women treated with aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer: An ESCEO position paper. European Society for Clinical and Economical aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO). Osteoporos. Int. 2012, 23, 2567–2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Taichman, L.S.; Van Poznak, C.H.; Inglehart, M.R. Self-reported oral health and quality of life of postmenopausal breast cancer survivors on aromatase inhibitors and women without cancer diagnoses: A longitudinal analysis. Support. Care Cancer 2016, 24, 4815–4824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Jardim, L.C.; Flores, P.T.; do Carmo Dos Santos Araújo, M.; Chiesa, J.; de Moraes, C.M.B.; Antoniazzi, R.P. Oral health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Support. Care Cancer 2019, 28, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Krimmel, M.; Ripperger, J.; Hairass, M.; Hoefert, S.; Kluba, S.; Reinert, S. Does dental and oral health influence the development and course of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ)? Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2014, 18, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Willershausen, I.; Schmidtmann, I.; Azaripour, A.; Kledtke, J.; Willershausen, B.; Hasenburg, A. Association between breast cancer chemotherapy, oral health and chronic dental infections: A pilot study. Odontology 2019, 107, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hong, C.H.; Napenas, J.J.; Hodgson, B.D.; Stokman, M.A.; Mathers-Stauffer, V.; Elting, L.S.; Spijkervet, F.K.; Brennan, M.T. Dental Disease Section, Oral Care Study Group, Multi-national Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC)/International Society of Oral Oncology (ISOO) 2010. A systematic review of dental disease in patients undergoing cancer therapy. Support. Care Cancer 2010, 18, 1007–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Raber-Durlacher, J.E.; Epstein, J.B.; Raber, J.; van Dissel, J.T.; van Winkelhoff, A.J.; Guiot, H.F.; van der Velden, U. Periodontal infection in cancer patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy. Support. Care Cancer 2002, 10, 466–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Calafiore, D.; Fortunato, L.; Migliario, M. Vitamin D for Clinical Diseases in Women: An Indispensable Factor in Medicine and Dentistry. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 30, 3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, Y.; Je, Y. Vitamin D intake, blood 25(OH)D levels, and breast cancer risk or mortality: A meta-analysis. Br. J. Cancer 2014, 110, 2772–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Li, C.; Li, H.; Zhong, H.; Li, X. Association of 25-hydroxyvitamin D level with survival outcomes in female breast cancer patients: A meta-analysis. J. Steroid. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2021, 212, 105947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Campbell, M.J.; Gombart, A.F.; Kwok, S.H.; Park, S.; Koeffler, H.P. The anti-proliferative effects of 1alpha,25(OH)2D3 on breast and prostate cancer cells are associated with induction of BRCA1 gene expression. Oncogene 2000, 19, 5091–5097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Blasiak, J.; Pawlowska, E.; Chojnacki, J.; Szczepanska, J.; Fila, M.; Chojnacki, C. Vitamin D in Triple-Negative and BRCA1 Deficient Breast Cancer-Implications for Pathogenesis and Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fisher, S.A.; Rahimzadeh, M.; Brierley, C.; Gration, B.; Doree, C.; Kimber, C.E.; Plaza Cajide, A.; Lamikanra, A.A.; Roberts, D.J. The role of vitamin D in increasing circulating T regulatory cell numbers and modulating T regulatory cell phenotypes in patients with inflammatory disease or in healthy volunteers: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Bikle, D.D. Vitamin D and immune function: Understanding commonpathways. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2009, 7, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kamen, D.L.; Tangpricha, V. Vitamin D and molecular actions on the immune system: Modulation of innate and autoimmunity. J. Mol. Med. 2010, 88, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Mathieu, C.; Adorini, L. The coming of age of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) analogs as immunomodulatory agents. Trends Mol. Med. 2002, 8, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ferrillo, M.; Migliario, M.; Roccuzzo, A.; Molinero-Mourelle, P.; Falcicchio, G.; Umano, G.R.; Pezzotti, F.; Foglio Bonda, P.L.; Calafiore, D.; de Sire, A. Periodontal Disease and Vitamin D Deficiency in Pregnant Women: Which Correlation with Preterm and Low-Weight Birth? J. Clin. Med. 2021, 2, 4578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. De Sire, A.; Ferrillo, M.; Lippi, L.; Agostini, F.; de Sire, R.; Ferrara, P.E.; Raguso, G.; Riso, S.; Roccuzzo, A.; Ronconi, G.; et al. Sarcopenic Dysphagia, Malnutrition, and Oral Frailty in Elderly: A Comprehensive Review. Nutrients 2022, 14, 982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Perić, M.; Maiter, D.; Cavalier, E.; Lasserre, J.F.; Toma, S. The Effects of 6-Month Vitamin D Supplementation during the Non-Surgical Treatment of Periodontitis in Vitamin-D-Deficient Patients: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study. Nutrients 2020, 25, 2940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hajishengallis, G.; Korosto, J.M. Revisiting the Page & Schroeder model: The good, the bad and the unknowns in the periodontal host response 40 years later. Periodontology 2000 2017, 75, 116–151. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. McMahon, L.; Schwartz, K.; Yilmaz, O.; Brown, E.; Ryan, L.K.; Diamond, G. Vitamin D-mediated induction of innate immunity in gingival epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79, 2250–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Gutner, M.; Chaushu, S.; Balter, D.; Bachrach, G. Saliva enables the antimicrobial activity of LL-37 in the presence of proteases of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 5558–5563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Freudenheim, J.L.; Genco, R.J.; LaMonte, M.J.; Millen, A.E.; Hovey, K.M.; Mai, X.; Nwizu, N.; Andrews, C.A.; Wactawski-Wende, J. Periodontal Disease and Breast Cancer: Prospective Cohort Study of Postmenopausal Women. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2016, 25, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Amódio, J.; Palioto, D.B.; Carrara, H.H.; Tiezzi, D.G.; Andrade, J.M.; Reis, F.J. Oral health after breast cancer treatment in postmenopausal women. Clinics 2014, 69, 706–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kyrgidis, A.; Triaridis, S.; Vahtsevanos, K.; Antoniades, K. Osteonecrosis of the jaw and bisphosphonate use in breast cancer patients. Expert Rev. Anticancer. Ther. 2009, 9, 1125–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vano, M.; Gennai, S.; Karapetsa, D.; Miceli, M.; Giuca, M.R.; Gabriele, M.; Graziani, F. The influence of educational level and oral hygiene behaviors on DMFT index and CPITN index in an adult Italian population: An epidemiological study. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2015, 13, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Greene, J.C.; Vermillon, J.R. The Simplified Oral Hygiene Index. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1964, 68, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. O’Leary, T.J.; Drake, R.B.; Naylor, J.E. The plaque control record. J. Periodontol. 1972, 43, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Winkel, E.G.; Roldan, S.; Van Winkelhoff, A.J.; Herrera, D.; Sanz, M. Clinical effects of a new mouthrinse containing chlorhexidine, cetylpyridiniumchloride and zinc-lactate on oral halitosis A dual-center, double-blind placebo-controlled study. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2003, 30, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Aimetti, M.; Perotto, S.; Castiglione, A.; Mariani, G.M.; Ferrarotti, F.; Romano, F. Prevalence of periodontitis in an adult population from an urban area in North Italy: Findings from a cross-sectional population-based epidemiological survey. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2015, 42, 622–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Penoni, D.C.; Fidalgo, T.K.; Torres, S.R.; Varela, V.M.; Masterson, D.; Leão, A.T.; Maia, L.C. Bone density and clinical periodontal attachment in postmenopausal women. J. Dent. Res. 2017, 96, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mohangi, G.U.; Singh-Rambirich, S.; Volchansky, A. Periodontal disease: Mechanisms of infection and inflammation and possible impact on miscellaneous systemic diseases and conditions. S. Afr. Dent. J. 2013, 68, 464–467. [Google Scholar]
  45. Chrcanovic, B.R.; Albrektsson, T.; Wennerberg, A. Smoking and dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dent. 2015, 43, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Warnakulasuriya, S.; Dietrich, T.; Bornstein, M.M.; Casals Peidró, E.; Preshaw, P.M.; Walter, C.; Wennström, J.L.; Bergström, J. Oral health risks of tobacco use and effects of cessation. Int. Dent. J. 2010, 60, 7–30. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hadji, P.; Aapro, M.S.; Body, J.J.; Gnant, M.; Brandi, M.L.; Reginster, J.Y.; Zillikens, M.C.; Glüer, C.C.; de Villiers, T.; Baber, R.; et al. Management of Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Bone Loss (AIBL) in postmenopausal women with hormone sensitive breast cancer: Joint position statement of the IOF, CABS, ECTS, IEG, ESCEO IMS, and SIOG. J. Bone Oncol. 2017, 23, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cuocolo, R.; Caruso, M.; Perillo, T.; Ugga, L.; Petretta, M. Machine Learning in oncology: A clinical appraisal. Cancer Lett. 2020, 481, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pinto, M.; Marotta, N.; Caracò, C.; Simeone, E.; Ammendolia, A.; de Sire, A. Quality of Life Predictors in Patients with Melanoma: A Machine Learning Approach. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 843611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. De Sire, A.; Gallelli, L.; Marotta, N.; Lippi, L.; Fusco, N.; Calafiore, D.; Cione, E.; Muraca, L.; Maconi, A.; De Sarro, G.; et al. Vitamin D Deficiency in Women with Breast Cancer: A Correlation with Osteoporosis? A Machine Learning Approach with Multiple Factor Analysis. Nutrients 2022, 11, 1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bécue-Bertaut, M.; Pagès, J. Multiple factor analysis and clustering of a mixture of quantitative, categorical and frequency data. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2008, 52, 3255–3268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Abdi, H.; Williams, L.J.; Valentin, D. Multiple factor analysis: Principal component analysis for multitable and multiblock datasets. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2013, 5, 149–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Machado, V.; Lobo, S.; Proença, L.; Mendes, J.J.; Botelho, J. Vitamin D and Periodontitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2020, 22, 2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gao, Z.; Liu, K.; Meng, H. Preliminary investigation of the vitamin D pathway in periodontal connective tissue cells. J. Periodontol. 2018, 89, 294–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Datta, M.; Schwartz, G.G. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation and loss of bone mineral density in women undergoing breast cancer therapy. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2013, 88, 613–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Sharma, D.K.; Sawyer, R.K.; Robertson, T.S.; Stamenkov, R.; Solomon, L.B.; Atkins, G.J.; Clifton, P.M.; Morris, H.A.; Anderson, P.H. Elevated Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels Are Associated with Improved Bone Formation and Micro-Structural Measures in Elderly Hip Fracture Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 15, 1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Wan, J.T.; Sheeley, D.M.; Somerman, M.J.; Lee, J.S. Mitigating osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) through preventive dental care and understanding of risk factors. Bone Res. 2020, 11, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Walawska-Hrycek, A.; Galus, W.; Hrycek, E.; Kaczmarczyk, A.; Krzystanek, E. The Impact of Vitamin D Low Doses on Its Serum Level and Cytokine Profile in Multiple Sclerosis Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 24, 2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Behm, C.; Blufstein, A.; Gahn, J.; Kubin, B.; Nemec, M.; Moritz, A.; Rausch-Fan, X.; Andrukhov, O. 1,25(OH)2D3 Differently Affects Immunomodulatory Activities of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Depending on the Presence of TNF-α, IL-1β and IFN-γ. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 14, 2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Lu, M.; Taylor, B.V.; Körner, H. Genomic Effects of the Vitamin D Receptor: Potentially the Link betweenVitamin D, Immune Cells, and Multiple Sclerosis. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. El-Sharkawy, A.; Malki, A. Vitamin D Signaling in Inflammation and Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications. Molecules 2020, 25, 3219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Fouad, Y.A.; Aanei, C. Revisiting the hallmarks of cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2017, 7, 1016–1036. [Google Scholar]
  63. Eldzharov, A.; Kabaloeva, D.; Nemeryuk, D.; Goncharenko, A.; Gatsalova, A.; Ivanova, E.; Kostritskiy, I.; Carrouel, F.; Bourgeois, D. Evaluation of Microcirculation, Cytokine Profile, and Local Antioxidant Protection Indices in Periodontal Health, and Stage II, Stage III Periodontitis. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 18, 1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Nomura, Y.; Morozumi, T.; Numabe, Y.; Ogata, Y.; Nakayama, Y.; Sugaya, T.; Nakamura, T.; Sato, S.; Takashiba, S.; Sekino, S.; et al. Estimation of the Periodontal Inflamed Surface Area by Simple Oral Examination. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 12, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. De Sire, A.; Baricich, A.; Ferrillo, M.; Migliario, M.; Cisari, C.; Invernizzi, M. Buccal hemineglect: Is it useful to evaluate the differences between the two halves of the oral cavity for the multidisciplinary rehabilitative management of right brain stroke survivors? A cross-sectional study. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 2020, 27, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. De Sire, A.; Invernizzi, M.; Ferrillo, M.; Gimigliano, F.; Baricich, A.; Cisari, C.; De Marchi, F.; Foglio Bonda, P.L.; Mazzini, L.; Migliario, M. Functional status and oral health in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A cross-sectional study. NeuroRehabilitation 2021, 48, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Nimavat, N.; Singh, S.; Fichadiya, N.; Sharma, P.; Patel, N.; Kumar, M.; Chauhan, G.; Pandit, N. Online Medical Education in India—Different Challenges and Probable Solutions in the Age of COVID-19. Adv. Med. Educ. Pract. 2021, 12, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Dagistan, S.; Bilge, O.M. Comparison of antegonial index, mental index, panoramic mandibular index and mandibular cortical index values in the panoramic radiographs of normal males and male patients with osteoporosis. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2010, 39, 290–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Czajkowska, S.; Rupa-Matysek, J.; Wojtasińska, E.; Nijakowski, K.; Gil, L.; Surdacka, A.; Kulczyk, T. Potential Biochemical Markers and Radiomorphometric Indices as Predictors of Reduced Bone Mass in Patients with Congenital Hemophilia. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Correlation among oral health, bone mineral density, and vitamin D status.
Figure 1. Correlation among oral health, bone mineral density, and vitamin D status.
Jcm 11 04662 g001
Table 1. Study population characteristics (n = 41).
Table 1. Study population characteristics (n = 41).
Mean age (years)66.1 ± 8.47
BMI (kg/m2)24.83 ± 4.41
Smokers (n, %)12 (29.27%)
Grading
G1 (n, %)5 (12.20%)
G2 (n, %)26 (63.41%)
G3 (n, %)10 (24.39%)
HER2 (n, %)9 (21.95%)
Ki-67
-Low (<18%) (n, %)24 (58.54%)
-High (>18%) (n, %)7 (17.07%)
RT (n, %)31 (75.61%)
HT (n, %) 41 (100.00%)
CT (n, %)17 (41.46%)
BCRL (n, %)9 (21.95%)
AWS (n, %)13 (31.71%)
Continuous variables are expressed as means ± standard deviations; categorical variables are expressed as counts (percentages). Abbreviations: HER2/neu: Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2; RT: radiotherapy; HT: hormone therapy; CT: chemotherapy; BCRL: Breast Cancer related-lymphedema; AWS: Axillary web syndrome.
Table 2. Vitamin D status and bone health outcomes in the study population (n = 41).
Table 2. Vitamin D status and bone health outcomes in the study population (n = 41).
Serum 25OH-Vit.D (ng/mL)14.63 ± 6.62
Serum 25(OH)vit. D ≥ 20 and <30 ng/mL (n, %)10 (24.39%)
Serum 25(OH)vit. D ≥ 10 and <20 ng/mL (n, %)21 (51.22%)
Serum 25(OH)vit. D < 10 ng/mL (n, %)10 (24.39%)
Serum calcium (mg/dL)9.23 ± 0.54
Serum PTH (pg/mL)43.5 ± 12.24
LS BMD (g/cm2) 0.92 ± 0.19
LS Tscore−1.91 ± 1.31
LS Zscore −0.45 ± 1.29
FN BMD (g/cm2) 0.74 ± 0.1
FN Tscore−1.94 ± 0.89
FN Zscore−0.54 ± 0.83
Osteoporosis (n, %)23 (56.10%)
Osteopenia (n, %)15 (36.59%)
Continuous variables are expressed as means ± standard deviations; categorical variables are expressed as counts (percentages). Abbreviations: 25(OH)vit. D: 25-hydroxy-vitamin D; PTH: parathyroid hormone; LS: lumbar spine; BMD: bone mineral density; FN: femoral neck.
Table 3. Oral hygiene status in the study population (n = 41).
Table 3. Oral hygiene status in the study population (n = 41).
Manual toothbrush (n, %)28 (68.29%)
Electric toothbrush (n, %)13 (31.71%)
Dental floss (n, %)16 (39.02%)
DMFT17.44 ± 6.76
OHI
≤1.2 (n, %)9 (21.95%)
>1.2 ≤ 3.0 (n, %)14 (34.15%)
>3.0≤ 6.0 (n, %)18 (43.90%)
PCR
From 0% to 25% (n, %)10 (24.39%)
>25% and ≤50% (n, %)12 (29.27%)
>50% and ≤75% (n, %)12 (29.27%)
>75% (n, %)7 (17.07%)
PSR
Normal periodontal health status (n, %)4 (9.76%)
Gingivitis (n, %)10 (24.39%)
Mild/moderate periodontitis (n, %)22 (53.65%)
Severe periodontitis (n, %)5 (12.2%)
WTCI
Grade 0 (n, %)5 (12.2%)
Grade 1 (n, %)21 (51.22%)
Grade 2 (n, %)15 (36.58%)
Continuous variables are expressed as means ± standard deviations; categorical data are expressed as counts (%). Abbreviations: DMFT = Decayed, Missing and Filled Permanent Teeth; OHI = Oral Hygiene Index; PCR = Plaque Control and Record; PSR = Periodontal Screening and Recording; WTCI = Winkel Tongue Coating Index.
Table 4. Univariate Logistic regression between the Decayed, Missing, and Filled Permanent Teeth Index (DMFT), oral hygiene habits, and breast cancer characteristics.
Table 4. Univariate Logistic regression between the Decayed, Missing, and Filled Permanent Teeth Index (DMFT), oral hygiene habits, and breast cancer characteristics.
VariableOdd Ratio (95% CI)p-Value
Smoke1.17 (1.03–1.32)0.005 *
Manual toothbrush use0.83 (0.73–1.11)0.052
Electric toothbrush use0.84 (0.75–1.09)0.052
Dental floss use0.83 (0.73–0.95)0.001 *
HER21.05 (0.94–1.18)0.522
Ki-671.01 (0.92–1.10)0.643
RT0.96 (0.86–1.07)0.651
HT1.06 (0.94–1.19)0.532
CT0.97 (0.88–1.06)0.522
BCRL1.01 (0.91–1.13)0.573
AWS1.06 (0.96–1.17)0.647
Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; HER2: Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2; RT: radiotherapy; HT: hormone therapy; CT: chemotherapy; AWS: Axillary web syndrome; BCRL: Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema; * = p value <0.05.
Table 5. Variable importance in regression random forest model in terms of correlation with Decayed, Missing, and Filled Permanent Teeth Index (DMFT).
Table 5. Variable importance in regression random forest model in terms of correlation with Decayed, Missing, and Filled Permanent Teeth Index (DMFT).
Mean Decrease in AccuracyTotal Increase in Node Purity
25OH-Vit.D serum levels0.221.46
Dental floss0.081.36
Smoke0.110.99
HER20.060.50
BCRL0.000.39
CT0.000.34
Toothbrush−0.020.30
Ki-67−0.010.27
AWS0.000.21
RT−0.010.16
HT0.000.00
Abbreviations: 25(OH)vit. D: 25-hydroxy-vitamin D; HER2: Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2; BCRL: Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema; CT: chemotherapy; AWS: Axillary web syndrome; RT: radiotherapy; HT: hormone therapy.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ferrillo, M.; Migliario, M.; Marotta, N.; Lippi, L.; Antonelli, A.; Calafiore, D.; Ammendolia, V.; Fortunato, L.; Renò, F.; Giudice, A.; et al. Oral Health in Breast Cancer Women with Vitamin D Deficiency: A Machine Learning Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 4662. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164662

AMA Style

Ferrillo M, Migliario M, Marotta N, Lippi L, Antonelli A, Calafiore D, Ammendolia V, Fortunato L, Renò F, Giudice A, et al. Oral Health in Breast Cancer Women with Vitamin D Deficiency: A Machine Learning Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(16):4662. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164662

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ferrillo, Martina, Mario Migliario, Nicola Marotta, Lorenzo Lippi, Alessandro Antonelli, Dario Calafiore, Valerio Ammendolia, Leonzio Fortunato, Filippo Renò, Amerigo Giudice, and et al. 2022. "Oral Health in Breast Cancer Women with Vitamin D Deficiency: A Machine Learning Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 16: 4662. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164662

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop