Variation of Complement Protein Levels in Maternal Plasma and Umbilical Cord Blood during Normal Pregnancy: An Observational Study
by
, ,
Muna Saleh
1,*
,
Michele Compagno
2, 
Sofia Pihl
3,4,
Helena Strevens
5,
Barbro Persson
6,
Jonas Wetterö
1,
Bo Nilsson
6,† and
Christopher Sjöwall
1,†
1
Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Inflammation and Infection/Rheumatology, Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden
2
Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, SE-222 42 Lund, Sweden
3
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Linköping University Hospital, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden
4
Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Children’s and Women’s Health, Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden
5
Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lund University, SE-222 42 Lund, Sweden
6
Rudbeck Laboratory C5:3, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(13), 3611; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133611
Submission received: 31 May 2022
/
Revised: 19 June 2022
/
Accepted: 20 June 2022
/
Published: 22 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathogenesis, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics in Neonatal and Pediatric Diseases: Prospective and Retrospective Clinical Studies)
Abstract
:The complement system constitutes a crucial part of the innate immunity, mediating opsonization, lysis, inflammation, and elimination of potential pathogens. In general, there is an increased activity of the complement system during pregnancy, which is essential for maintaining the host’s defense and fetal survival. Unbalanced or excessive activation of the complement system in the placenta is associated with pregnancy complications, such as miscarriage, preeclampsia, and premature birth. Nonetheless, the actual clinical value of monitoring the activation of the complement system during pregnancy remains to be investigated. Unfortunately, normal reference values specifically for pregnant women are missing, and for umbilical cord blood (UCB), data on complement protein levels are scarce. Herein, complement protein analyses (C1q, C3, C4, C3d levels, and C3d/C3 ratio) were performed in plasma samples from 100 healthy, non-medicated and non-smoking pregnant women, collected during different trimesters and at the time of delivery. In addition, UCB was collected at all deliveries. Maternal plasma C1q and C3d/C3 ratio showed the highest mean values during the first trimester, whereas C3, C4, and C3d had rising values until delivery. We observed low levels of C1q and C4 as well as increased C3d and C3d/C3 ratio, particularly during the first trimester, as a sign of complement activation in some women. However, the reference limits of complement analyses applied for the general population appeared appropriate for the majority of the samples. As expected, the mean complement concentrations in UCB were much lower than in maternal plasma, due to the immature complement system in neonates.
1. Introduction
The highly conserved complement system has pivotal roles in innate immunity, e.g., by mediating opsonization, lysis, inflammation, and elimination of potential pathogens. Furthermore, it provides a link between the innate and the adaptive immune system by clearance of immune complexes and apoptotic cells [1]. In addition, the complement system is important in normal pregnancy and normal placentation for maternal host defense and fetal survival. Several recent studies suggest that a delicate regulation of complement activation is crucial for successful pregnancy [2,3]. During normal pregnancy, the mother’s immune system undergoes certain adaptions, e.g., downregulation of polymorphic classical class I human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules (HLA-A and HLA-B) in invasive trophoblasts [4,5], a shift from the T helper (Th) 1 to the Th2 phenotype [6], and expression of uterine natural killer cells [7] at the maternal–fetal interface to protect the semiallogeneic fetus and placenta [8].
The complement system is organized into three activation pathways: the classical pathway (CP), the lectin pathway (LP), and the alternative pathway (AP). All pathways have different recognition molecules and lead to increased formation of C3 and C5 convertases, resulting in the cleavage of C3 and C5, respectively, and the release of the anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a. Activation of C5 can further elicit assembly of the terminal pathway of the complement cascade to generate the membrane attack complex. C1q is the first molecule of the classical pathway of complement activation and is widely distributed in the human decidual stroma [9,10]. Adequate C1q expression at the maternal–fetal interface appears to be important in placental formation and pregnancy maintenance [9,11]. In both CP and LP, the classical/lectin C3 convertase is produced via cleavage of C4, and the plasma levels of consumed C4 reflect the potential activation of these two pathways. Apoptosis and release of free deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) occur during placental formation in early pregnancy, which can trigger complement activation and complement system-mediated clearance [2,3]. Three complement regulatory proteins expressed on syncytiotrophoblasts can ensure the process of physiological placentation: decay-accelerating factor, membrane co-factor protein, and protectin (CD59) [12,13].
In general, moderate activation of the complement system is crucial for maintaining pregnancy, and any deviation from normal activation and regulation of the complement system can result in adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO), such as recurrent miscarriage [14], premature birth [15], and preeclampsia [16,17,18].
The complement components are synthesized from an early stage in the fetus with a relative deficiency of most of the complement proteins in umbilical cord blood (UCB) compared to levels in adults [19,20,21,22]. The first components to be detected are C3 and C4 at weeks 5 and 8, respectively, of gestation, while factor B is present in the fetal circulation at approximately the 10th gestational week (GW) [23,24]. Previous studies assume that all the complement components can be detected at 18–20 weeks of gestation [23,25]. However, more in-depth and recent investigations on the intrauterine development and function of the complement system are scarce [22].
To our knowledge, normal ranges for complement proteins during pregnancy are not known. Such intervals would facilitate an increased understanding of the complement system during pregnancy, as well as the clinical assessment of pregnant women, to estimate the risk of APO, e.g., in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) where the risks of APO are increased [26]. Similarly, there is a knowledge gap regarding the complement activation in UCB [22,27].
Most previous studies on the dysregulation of the complement system and APO had a cross-sectional design. The present investigation is a longitudinal study that aims to establish the normal plasma concentration ranges of complement components in healthy women during different stages of normal pregnancy and in the UCB of healthy newborns. In addition, we aimed to investigate potential correlations between the levels of the complement components and some easily assessed variables, such as the mother’s age, parity, body mass index (BMI), levels of serum albumin and cystatin C (cys C), as well as newborns birth weight.
2. Methods
2.1. Study Population
One hundred healthy, non-medicated and non-smoking women with 100 normal singleton pregnancies were recruited during the years 2015–2018, as previously described [28]. EDTA plasma samples were made available from the pregnancy biobank (Graviditetsbiobanken, GraBB), founded at the Linköping University Hospital in collaboration with Linköping University. Longitudinal clinical data and plasma samples were collected for all the recruited females prospectively during the first (GW 8–11) and second (GW 12–25) trimesters (T1 and T2), as well as at time of delivery (partus). Furthermore, all newborns’ UCB were available.
The women were aged 18–40 at the time of conception and their baseline BMI was in the range of 18–25 kg/m2. All the pregnancies were term (duration ranging from 37–41 weeks) and without complications. Above 90% of the women were of Caucasian origin. Only pregnancies resulting in non-instrumental vaginal delivery and neonates with normal weight for gestational age were considered for the study. In addition, pregnancies were selected by date of birth and evenly distributed over quarters of the year to minimize the impact of seasonal variations. Selected characteristics of the participating women are detailed in Table 1.
2.2. Routine Laboratory Analyses
To rule out impaired renal function and/or hypoalbuminemia, cys C and albumin were determined in all plasma samples from all subjects during pregnancy. Albumin and cys C were analyzed at the unit for Clinical Chemistry at Linköping University Hospital. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on cys C was also calculated [29]. These laboratory variables are reported in Table 1.
2.3. Complement Analyses
The complement protein analysis was performed at the unit for Clinical Immunology at Uppsala University Hospital. C1q was quantified by magnetic bead-based immunoassay, which is an in-house assay performed using the Amine Coupling Kit (BIO-RAD) according to the manufacturer’s instructions [30]. The concentrations of C3 and C4 were quantified by nephelometry using an IMMAGE nephelometer (Beckman Coulter, Bromma, Sweden). C3d was measured by nephelometry, after the removal of high molecular weight forms of C3 by polyethylene glycol precipitation [31]. The normal reference limits applied in clinical routine are: C1q = 70–300 mg/L; C3 = 0.67–1.29 g/L; C4 = 0.13–0.32 g/L; C3d < 5.3 g/L; C3d/C3 ratio < 5.3.
2.4. Statistics
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS statistics version 28 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) or with GraphPad Prism version 9 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). As data were mainly normally distributed, the mean values of complement proteins were calculated, and parametric statistical methods were applied. One-way ANOVA was used to detect any significant differences between the groups. To assess the six different comparisons between the different blood samplings (T1, T2, partus, and UCB), paired t-tests were performed. The multiple comparisons between the time samples were Bonferroni-adjusted. p-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Correlation analyses between continuous variables were performed with Pearson’s r test for parametric data, and the associations of continuous variables and categorical variables were analyzed by the Mann–Whitney U test.
2.5. Ethical Approval
Oral and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants during their first visit to the antenatal clinic, which allows biobank access to plasma samples as described above, as well as present and future medical records for research purposes. This information was given according to the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Decision number 2010/296–31 and 2019–00424).
3. Results
3.1. Complement Protein Levels during Pregnancy
The current normal complement protein ranges used in clinical routine were compared with the levels detected during pregnancy. Our results show that the mean values of C1q, C3, C4, C3d, and C3d/C3 ratio are within the established normal limits, even with respect to UCB (Table 2). However, during maturity of the pregnancies, complement factors changed. For example, the 5th percentile of C1q was clearly lower than the lower reference limit at all three samplings (T1, T2, and partus). The same observation was made for C4 in T1. In addition, the 95th percentile of both C3d and C3d/C3 ratio showed higher levels than the cut-offs applied in clinical routine for all sampling occasions. All complement proteins levels in UCB plasma were significantly lower than in maternal plasma whereas the C3d/C3 ratio was higher (Table 2 and Figure 1A–E).
3.2. Associations between Complement Proteins and Evaluated Variables
C1q at T1 showed significant association with parity, as the detected levels were significantly lower in primipara than in multipara (mean C1q primipara 45.1 vs. 59.0 mg/L; p = 0.02). Albumin inversely correlated with C3 and C4 during every studied trimester, and with C3d/C3 ratio in T1. Throughout the pregnancies, albumin levels showed inverse correlations with C3 (p < 0.0001), C4 (p < 0.0001), C3d/C3 ratio (p < 0.0001), and C1q (p = 0.02), as demonstrated in Figure 2A–E. As shown in Table 3, BMI measured during the three pregnancy periods was significantly correlated with C3 (p = 0.04) and C4 (p = 0.03) at T2, and with C3d at T1 (p = 0.05). The birth weight of the newborns showed a significant correlation with C3 in UCB (p = 0.03) and with C3d at T2 (p = 0.05).
No significant correlations were found between complement levels and cys C and duration of pregnancy (weeks). Neither did we observe any association between complement and the newborn’s sex (Table 3).
4. Discussion
The complement proteins investigated herein are quantified in daily clinical routine, e.g., to detect complement deficiencies and complement activation after the formation of immune complexes, as seen in systemic inflammatory diseases, such as SLE and antiphospholipid syndrome [32,33,34]. The regulation of complement activation is a delicate balance between activation and inhibition that is necessary for a normal pregnancy, while unregulated complement activation has a role in the development of pregnancy complications such as miscarriage, preeclampsia, and preterm births [14,15,16].
In this study, we observed that the levels of complement proteins changed significantly during the different stages of pregnancy, but still mainly remained within the normal reference range used in clinical routine. However, as a sign of activation of the CP, decreased levels of C1q (all trimesters), C4 (T1), and increased C3d and C3d/C3 ratio (all trimesters) were observed in approximately 5% of the women. Variation of circulating complement protein levels during the trimesters of normal successful pregnancies probably reflects the delicate regulation of the complement system. A recent study made similar observations and concluded that the pregnancy itself may affect complement protein levels [35].
There is a lack of knowledge regarding the levels of complement proteins in UCB and only a few prior studies have investigated this matter in detail [19,27]. Consistent with the results from Johnson et al. [27], we found significantly lower levels of complement proteins in UCB than in the corresponding maternal plasma, due to the low production of these proteins related to immaturity of the complement system in neonates [22], which poses a considerable risk for severe infections [7,36,37].
Plasma albumin correlated repeatedly and significantly in all periods of pregnancy with both C3 and C4 levels and with C3d/C3 ratio in T1. In addition, albumin levels were slightly below the normal limit during T1 and T2. It is well established that plasma albumin is a known negative acute phase reactant that decreases during infectious and inflammatory conditions [38]. The pregnancy itself normally causes low-grade inflammation, generally represented by elevated levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) in normal and uncomplicated pregnancies [39,40,41]. A recent investigation, performed by our research group on the same study population, found an inverse correlation between plasma albumin and CRP, and CRP levels seemed to be above the normal range limits used for non-pregnant women [28]. In this context, it is worth mentioning that CRP has the potential to activate the CP [42]. However, the positive correlations between plasma albumin and some levels of the complement proteins support a possible association between low-grade inflammation and complement activation during normal pregnancies.
Cys C in plasma was analyzed herein since it can be used for close supervision and early diagnosis of renal impairment in pregnant women—with better reliability than plasma creatinine according to previous studies [43,44]. Cys C levels in our study population were within the normal limits during T1 and T2 with a slight increase in partus samplings as shown in Table 1. Consequently, the eGFR calculated from cys C showed values within reference limits in T1 and T2, while the mean value of eGFR in partus samplings was below normal limits (eGFR >90 mL/min/1.73 m2). As previously mentioned, cys C levels were not found to be decreased in term pregnancy, though GFR of low molecular mass substances is known to increase by at least 40% during pregnancy in general [44]. This is in line with a known decrease in GFR even in normal and healthy term pregnancy, which is associated with glomerular endothelial swelling (endotheliosis) [45,46]. Thus, despite cys C changes during studied pregnancies here, it had not correlated with the complement proteins levels in all studied pregnancy periods.
The mothers’ BMI was within the normal limits (18–25 kg/m2) at the time of conception. BMI was measured at different stages of pregnancy, and it correlated with C3, C4, and C3d during some of the pregnancy periods (Table 3). A positive correlation was also observed between the weight of the offspring and C3 in UCB as well as with C3d in maternal plasma during T2. The relation between body weight or weight changes and levels of AP components of the complement system has previously been highlighted, possibly due to the production of pro-inflammatory factors in adipose tissue or at other sites [47].
The main limitation of this study is the relatively small number of included subjects. The homogeneity of the study population, which was mainly of Caucasian origin, also limits the possibility of generalization of our results to other ethnicities. The longitudinal design of the study, with measurement of complement factors in different stages of pregnancy in a well-characterized study population, represents a major strength of our investigation.
5. Conclusions
With the exceptions described above, we conclude that the reference ranges of complement factors used in clinical practice are principally reliable and broad enough to encompass the variations seen in women during normal pregnancy and in newborns after normal gestation and uncomplicated deliveries. Nonetheless, the significant differences observed in levels of complement proteins over time may suggest the implementation of more stringent ranges during different phases of gestation. Our findings have implications, particularly in clinical settings where monitoring of the complement system may be crucial to avoid APO. As expected, complement levels were generally lower in UCB than in maternal plasma due to the still immature neonatal immune system.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.S., J.W. and C.S.; methodology, M.S., S.P., B.N. and C.S.; validation, M.S., S.P., B.P. and B.N.; formal analysis, M.S. and M.C.; investigation, M.S., M.C., S.P., H.S., B.P., J.W., B.N. and C.S.; data curation, M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S.; writing—review and editing, M.S., M.C., H.S., J.W. and C.S.; visualization, M.S.; supervision, M.C., H.S., J.W. and C.S.; project administration, J.W., B.N. and C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from Region Östergötland (ALF Grants) [RÖ-932055], the Swedish Rheumatism Association [R-939149], the Ulla and Roland Gustafsson Foundation, the King Gustaf V’s 80-year Anniversary foundation [FAI-2020-0663] and the King Gustaf V and Queen Victoria’s Freemasons foundation.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the regional ethics review board in Linköping (Decision number 2010/296-31 and 2019-00424).
Informed Consent Statement
Oral and written informed consent were obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
Data available on request from the authors.
Acknowledgments
We thank Jan Ernerudh, Linköping, for his support. The technical expertise of Sliva Alshammari, Uppsala, is highly appreciated.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Rus, H.; Cudrici, C.; Niculescu, F. The role of the complement system in innate immunity. Immunol. Res. 2005, 33, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Triggianese, P.; Perricone, C.; Chimenti, M.S.; De Carolis, C.; Perricone, R. Innate Immune System at the Maternal-Fetal Interface: Mechanisms of Disease and Targets of Therapy in Pregnancy Syndromes. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2016, 76, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Girardi, G. Complement activation, a threat to pregnancy. Semin. Immunopathol. 2018, 40, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fuzzi, B.; Rizzo, R.; Criscuoli, L.; Noci, I.; Melchiorri, L.; Scarselli, B.; Bencini, E.; Menicucci, A.; Baricordi, O.R. HLA-G expression in early embryos is a fundamental prerequisite for the obtainment of pregnancy. Eur. J. Immunol. 2002, 32, 311–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rouas-Freiss, N.; Marchal, R.E.; Kirszenbaum, M.; Dausset, J.; Carosella, E.D. The alpha1 domain of HLA-G1 and HLA-G2 inhibits cytotoxicity induced by natural killer cells: Is HLA-G the public ligand for natural killer cell inhibitory receptors? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 5249–5254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Munn, D.H.; Zhou, M.; Attwood, J.T.; Bondarev, I.; Conway, S.J.; Marshall, B.; Brown, C.; Mellor, A.L. Prevention of allogeneic fetal rejection by tryptophan catabolism. Science 1998, 281, 1191–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strunk, T.; Currie, A.; Richmond, P.; Simmer, K.; Burgner, D. Innate immunity in human newborn infants: Prematurity means more than immaturity. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011, 24, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trowsdale, J.; Betz, A.G. Mother’s little helpers: Mechanisms of maternal-fetal tolerance. Nat. Immunol. 2006, 7, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bulla, R.; Agostinis, C.; Bossi, F.; Rizzi, L.; Debeus, A.; Tripodo, C.; Radillo, O.; De Seta, F.; Ghebrehiwet, B.; Tedesco, F. Decidual endothelial cells express surface-bound C1q as a molecular bridge between endovascular trophoblast and decidual endothelium. Mol. Immunol. 2008, 45, 2629–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nayak, A.; Pednekar, L.; Reid, K.B.; Kishore, U. Complement and non-complement activating functions of C1q: A prototypical innate immune molecule. Innate Immun. 2012, 18, 350–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agostinis, C.; Tedesco, F.; Bulla, R. Alternative functions of the complement protein C1q at embryo implantation site. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2017, 119, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Buurma, A.; Cohen, D.; Veraar, K.; Schonkeren, D.; Claas, F.H.; Bruijn, J.A.; Bloemenkamp, K.W.; Baelde, H.J. Preeclampsia is characterized by placental complement dysregulation. Hypertension 2012, 60, 1332–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lokki, A.I.; Heikkinen-Eloranta, J.; Jarva, H.; Saisto, T.; Lokki, M.-L.; Laivuori, H.; Meri, S. Complement activation and regulation in preeclamptic placenta. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Banadakoppa, M.; Chauhan, M.S.; Havemann, D.; Balakrishnan, M.; Dominic, J.S.; Yallampalli, C. Spontaneous abortion is associated with elevated systemic C5a and reduced mRNA of complement inhibitory proteins in placenta. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2014, 177, 743–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lynch, A.M.; Gibbs, R.S.; Murphy, J.R.; Byers, T.; Neville, M.C.; Giclas, P.C.; Salmon, J.E.; Van Hecke, T.M.; Holers, V.M. Complement activation fragment Bb in early pregnancy and spontaneous preterm birth. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008, 199, 345.e1–345.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regal, J.F.; Burwick, R.; Fleming, S.D. The Complement System and Preeclampsia. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2017, 19, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velickovic, I.; Dalloul, M.; Wong, K.A.; Bakare, O.; Schweis, F.; Garala, M.; Alam, A.; Medranda, G.; Lekovic, J.; Shuaib, W.; et al. Complement factor B activation in patients with preeclampsia. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2015, 109, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- He, Y.; Xu, B.; Song, D.; Yu, F.; Chen, Q.; Zhao, M. Expression of the complement system’s activation factors in plasma of patients with early/late-onset severe pre-eclampsia. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2016, 76, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonntag, J.; Brandenburg, U.; Polzehl, D.; Strauss, E.; Vogel, M.; Dudenhausen, J.; Obladen, M. Complement system in healthy term newborns: Reference values in umbilical cord blood. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. 1998, 1, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolach, B.; Dolfin, T.; Regev, R.; Gilboa, S.; Schlesinger, M. The development of the complement system after 28 weeks’ gestation. Acta Paediatr. 1997, 86, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zilow, G.; Zilow, E.P.; Burger, R.; Linderkamp, O. Complement activation in newborn infants with early onset infection. Pediatr. Res. 1993, 34, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Grumach, A.S.; Ceccon, M.E.; Rutz, R.; Fertig, A.; Kirschfink, M. Complement profile in neonates of different gestational ages. Scand. J. Immunol. 2014, 79, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Adinolfi, M.; Dobson, N.C.; Bradwell, A.R. Synthesis of two components of human complement, beta 1H and C3bINA, during fetal life. Acta Paediatr. Scand. 1981, 70, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tandon, R.; Bhatia, B.D.; Narang, P.; Tyagi, N.K. Maternal and cord serum C3 level. Indian Pediatr. 1984, 21, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Davis, C.A.; Vallota, E.H.; Forristal, J. Serum complement levels in infancy: Age related changes. Pediatr. Res. 1979, 13, 1043–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saleh, M.; Sjöwall, C.; Strevens, H.; Jönsen, A.; Bengtsson, A.A.; Compagno, M. Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes after Multi-Professional Follow-Up of Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An Observational Study from a Single Centre in Sweden. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, U.; Truedsson, L.; Gustavii, B. Complement components in 100 newborns and their mothers determined by electroimmunoassay. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. C 1983, 91, 147–150. [Google Scholar]
- Wirestam, L.; Pihl, S.; Saleh, M.; Wetterö, J.; Sjöwall, C. Plasma C-Reactive Protein and Pentraxin-3 Reference Intervals During Normal Pregnancy. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 722118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grubb, A.; Horio, M.; Hansson, L.-O.; Björk, J.; Nyman, U.; Flodin, M.; Larsson, A.; Bökenkamp, A.; Yasuda, Y.; Blufpand, H.; et al. Generation of a new cystatin C-based estimating equation for glomerular filtration rate by use of 7 assays standardized to the international calibrator. Clin. Chem. 2014, 60, 974–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandholm, K.; Persson, B.; Skattum, L.; Eggertsen, G.; Nyman, D.; Gunnarsson, I.; Svenungsson, E.; Nilsson, B.; Ekdahl, K.N. Evaluation of a Novel Immunoassay for Quantification of C1q for Clinical Diagnostic Use. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ekdahl, K.N.; Norberg, D.; Bengtsson, A.A.; Sturfelt, G.; Nilsson, U.R.; Nilsson, B. Use of serum or buffer-changed EDTA-plasma in a rapid, inexpensive, and easy-to-perform hemolytic complement assay for differential diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus and monitoring of patients with the disease. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2007, 14, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ekdahl, K.N.; Persson, B.; Mohlin, C.; Sandholm, K.; Skattum, L.; Nilsson, B. Interpretation of Serological Complement Biomarkers in Disease. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Björk, M.; Dahlström, Ö.; Wetterö, J.; Sjöwall, C. Quality of life and acquired organ damage are intimately related to activity limitations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2015, 16, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Frodlund, M.; Vikerfors, A.; Grosso, G.; Skogh, T.; Wetterö, J.; Elvin, K.; Gunnarsson, I.; Kastbom, A.; Dahlström, Ö.; Rönnelid, J.; et al. Immunoglobulin A anti-phospholipid antibodies in Swedish cases of systemic lupus erythematosus: Associations with disease phenotypes, vascular events and damage accrual. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2018, 194, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- He, Y.; Xu, B.; Song, D.; Wang, Y.; Yu, F.; Chen, Q.; Zhao, M. Normal range of complement components during pregnancy: A prospective study. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2020, 83, e13202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Levy, O. Innate immunity of the newborn: Basic mechanisms and clinical correlates. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007, 7, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- West, L.J. Defining critical windows in the development of the human immune system. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2002, 21, 499–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Don, B.R.; Kaysen, G. Serum albumin: Relationship to inflammation and nutrition. Semin. Dial. 2004, 17, 432–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fink, N.R.; Chawes, B.; Bønnelykke, K.; Thorsen, J.; Stokholm, J.; Rasmussen, M.A.; Brix, S.; Bisgaard, H. Levels of Systemic Low-grade Inflammation in Pregnant Mothers and Their Offspring are Correlated. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watts, D.H.; Krohn, M.A.; Wener, M.H.; Eschenbach, D.A. C-reactive protein in normal pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991, 77, 176–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belo, L.; Santos-Silva, A.; Rocha, S.; Caslake, M.; Cooney, J.; Pereira-Leite, L.; Quintanilha, A.; Rebelo, I. Fluctuations in C-reactive protein concentration and neutrophil activation during normal human pregnancy. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2005, 123, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sjöwall, C.; Wetterö, J.; Bengtsson, T.; Askendal, A.; Almroth, G.; Skogh, T.; Tengvall, P. Solid-phase classical complement activation by C-reactive protein (CRP) is inhibited by fluid-phase CRP-C1q interaction. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 352, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Babay, Z.; Al-Wakeel, J.; Addar, M.; Mittwalli, A.; Tarif, N.; Hammad, D.; Ali, N.; Al-Askar, A.; Choudhary, A.R. Serum cystatin C in pregnant women: Reference values, reliable and superior diagnostic accuracy. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 32, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Strevens, H.; Wide-Swensson, D.; Torffvit, O.; Grubb, A. Serum cystatin C for assessment of glomerular filtration rate in pregnant and non-pregnant women. Indications of altered filtration process in pregnancy. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. 2002, 62, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strevens, H.; Wide-Swensson, D.; Hansen, A.; Horn, T.; Ingemarsson, I.; Larsen, S.; Willner, J.; Olsen, S. Glomerular endotheliosis in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. BJOG 2003, 110, 831–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strevens, H.; Wide-Swensson, D.; Grubb, A.; Hansen, A.; Horn, T.; Ingemarsson, I.; Larsen, S.; Nyengaard, J.R.; Torffvit, O.; Willner, J.; et al. Serum cystatin C reflects glomerular endotheliosis in normal, hypertensive and pre-eclamptic pregnancies. BJOG 2003, 110, 825–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pomeroy, C.; Mitchell, J.; Eckert, E.; Raymond, N.; Crosby, R.; Dalmasso, A.P. Effect of body weight and caloric restriction on serum complement proteins, including Factor D/adipsin: Studies in anorexia nervosa and obesity. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1997, 108, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
(A–E) Complement protein levels in maternal plasma during different stages of pregnancy and in umbilical cord blood (UCB). Dotted lines indicate reference limits used in clinical routine. Boxes show the 25th to 75th percentile, with median values marked inside. The provided p values are Bonferroni-adjusted.
Figure 1.
(A–E) Complement protein levels in maternal plasma during different stages of pregnancy and in umbilical cord blood (UCB). Dotted lines indicate reference limits used in clinical routine. Boxes show the 25th to 75th percentile, with median values marked inside. The provided p values are Bonferroni-adjusted.
Figure 2.
(A–E) Correlations of plasma albumin levels and different complement levels throughout the pregnancies. Correlation coefficients and significance levels are given both for merged data and for all sampling occasions.
Figure 2.
(A–E) Correlations of plasma albumin levels and different complement levels throughout the pregnancies. Correlation coefficients and significance levels are given both for merged data and for all sampling occasions.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the participating women 1 (n = 100) and their newborns.
| Mean age, years (SD) | 30.0 (3.8) |
| Caucasian ethnicity, n (%) | 92 (92) |
| Mean body mass index at inclusion, kg/m2 (SD) | 22.0 (1.8) |
| Mean gestation duration in weeks + days (range) | 40 + 1 (37 + 4 − 41 + 4) |
| Multiparous, n (%) | 39 (39) |
| Births in January–March, n (%) | 25 (25) |
| Births in April–June, n (%) | 23 (23) |
| Births in July–September, n (%) | 27 (27) |
| Births in October–December, n (%) | 25 (25) |
| Mean birth weight, g (SD) | 3572.2 (399.5) |
| Female newborns, n (%) | 50 (50) |
| Routine Laboratory Analyses (mean (SD)) | |
| T1: P-albumin (g/L) | 42.9 (4.3) |
| T2: P-albumin (g/L) | 34.7 (3.6) |
| Partus: P-albumin (g/L) | 34.1 (4.5) |
| T1: P-cystatin C (mg/L) | 0.74 (0.10) |
| T2: P-cystatin C (mg/L) | 0.84 (0.11) |
| Partus: P-cystatin C (mg/L) | 1.3 (0.28) |
| T1: eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 116.8 (19.2) |
| T2: eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 101.3 (17.3) |
| Partus: eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 60.1 (13.8) |
eGFR, estimated glomerular filtrations rate; P-, plasma; SD, standard deviation; T1, trimester 1; T2, trimester 2. 1 The present study population was selected from a larger pregnancy cohort (GRABB) in order to include only healthy females and normal singleton pregnancies [28].
Table 2.
Complement protein levels in maternal plasma and umbilical cord blood.
| Complement | Sampling Occassion | Mean | SD | Min | Max | Percentiles | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | 3rd | 5th | 95th | 97th | 99th | ||||||
| C1q (mg/L) Ref. 70–300 | T1 | 84.6 | 22.3 | 47.8 | 205.8 | 47.8 | 50.3 | 52.1 | 112.2 | 122.8 | 205.1 |
| T2 | 69.8 | 15.5 | 34.1 | 113.9 | 34.1 | 39.8 | 45.8 | 95.7 | 103.9 | 113.9 | |
| Partus | 81.5 | 19.7 | 38.0 | 134.9 | 38.0 | 44.5 | 46.9 | 121.8 | 123.9 | 134.8 | |
| UCB | 58.2 | 16.4 | 19.9 | 112.4 | 19.9 | 34.2 | 36.7 | 85.4 | 102.3 | 112.4 | |
| C3 (g/L) Ref. 0.67–1.29 | T1 | 0.95 | 0.17 | 0.43 | 1.3 | 0.43 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| T2 | 1.1 | 0.16 | 0.47 | 1.6 | 0.47 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 | |
| Partus | 1.2 | 0.21 | 0.57 | 1.9 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.9 | |
| UCB | 0.74 | 0.15 | 0.49 | 1.2 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | |
| C4 (g/L) Ref. 0.13–0.32 | T1 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.4 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.36 |
| T2 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.35 | |
| Partus | 0.28 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.6 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.41 | 0.49 | 0.55 | |
| UCB | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.3 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.31 | |
| C3d (g/L) Ref. < 5.3 | T1 | 4.4 | 0.98 | 1.6 | 6.5 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.5 |
| T2 | 4.4 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 7.7 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 6.1 | 6.4 | 7.7 | |
| Partus | 4.9 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 20.1 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 7.6 | 8.1 | 20.1 | |
| UCB | 4.4 | 2.6 | 0.01 | 24.0 | 0.02 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 8.2 | 8.4 | 23.9 | |
| C3d/C3 ratio Ref. < 5.3 | T1 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 8.9 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 6.7 | 7.4 | 8.9 |
| T2 | 4.3 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 10.4 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 6.2 | 6.7 | 10.4 | |
| Partus | 4.1 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 17.2 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 6.6 | 7.8 | 17.2 | |
| UCB | 6.0 | 3.5 | 0.01 | 32.1 | 0.03 | 1.8 | 2.6 | 9.9 | 14.0 | 32.0 | |
C3, complement protein 3; C4, complement protein 4; Ref., reference limits; SD, standard deviation; T1, trimester 1; T2, trimester 2; UCB, umbilical cord blood.
Table 3.
Associations between complement protein levels and studied variables.
| Comp-Lement | Sampling Occasion | Body Mass Index (Mothers’) | P-Cystatin C | Mothers’ Age | Newborns’ Weight | Parity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | Partus | T1 | T2 | Partus | |||||
| C1q (mg/L) | T1 | n.s. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.s. | p = 0.02 |
| T2 | n.t. | n.s. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.t. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| Partus | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| UCB | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| C3 (g/L) | T1 | n.s. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
| T2 | n.t. | r = 0.21; p = 0.04 | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.t. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| Partus | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| UCB | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | r = 0.22; p = 0.03 | n.s. | |
| C4 (g/L) | T1 | n.s. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
| T2 | n.t. | r = 0.23; p = 0.03 | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.t. | r = −0.24; p = 0.02 | n.s. | n.s. | |
| Partus | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| UCB | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| C3d (g/L) | T1 | r = 0.24; p = 0.02 | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
| T2 | n.t. | n.s. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.t. | n.s. | r = 0.20; p = 0.05 | n.s. | |
| Partus | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| UCB | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| C3d/C3 ratio | T1 | n.s. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
| T2 | n.t. | n.s. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.t. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| Partus | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| UCB | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.t. | n.s. | n.s. | |
BMI, body mass index; C3, complement protein 3; C4, complement protein 4; n.s., not significant; n.t., not tested; T1, trimester 1; T2, trimester 2; UCB, umbilical cord blood
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Saleh, M.; Compagno, M.; Pihl, S.; Strevens, H.; Persson, B.; Wetterö, J.; Nilsson, B.; Sjöwall, C. Variation of Complement Protein Levels in Maternal Plasma and Umbilical Cord Blood during Normal Pregnancy: An Observational Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3611. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133611
AMA Style
Saleh M, Compagno M, Pihl S, Strevens H, Persson B, Wetterö J, Nilsson B, Sjöwall C. Variation of Complement Protein Levels in Maternal Plasma and Umbilical Cord Blood during Normal Pregnancy: An Observational Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(13):3611. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133611
Chicago/Turabian StyleSaleh, Muna, Michele Compagno, Sofia Pihl, Helena Strevens, Barbro Persson, Jonas Wetterö, Bo Nilsson, and Christopher Sjöwall. 2022. "Variation of Complement Protein Levels in Maternal Plasma and Umbilical Cord Blood during Normal Pregnancy: An Observational Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 13: 3611. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133611
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
