Next Article in Journal
Supervised Physiotherapy Improves Three-Dimensional (3D) Gait Parameters in Patients after Surgical Suturing of the Achilles Tendon Using an Open Method (SSATOM)
Previous Article in Journal
Surgical Management after Chiari Decompression Failure: Craniovertebral Junction Revision versus Shunting Strategies
Previous Article in Special Issue
How to Manage Withdrawal of Sedation and Analgesia in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Comment

Avoiding, Not Managing, Drug Withdrawal Syndrome in the Setting of COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Comment on Ego et al. How to Manage Withdrawal of Sedation and Analgesia in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients? J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4917

1
Critical Care, Hôpital d’Instruction des Armées Desgenettes, 69008 Lyon, France
2
Critical Care, Centre Hospitalier de Wallonie Picarde, 7500 Tournai, Belgium
3
Critical Care, JF Kennedy North Hospital, West Palm Beach, FL 33407, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(12), 3336; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123336
Submission received: 14 January 2022 / Accepted: 8 June 2022 / Published: 10 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Analgesic Drugs and COVID-19)
The management of sedation in the setting of COVID-19 (“COVID”) by Ego et al. [1] does not combine pathophysiology and pharmacology. Their premise rests on «decreasing the work of breathing, applying lung protective ventilation and limiting asynchronies [to] minimize the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI)……COVID-19 patients require high [doses] of sedatives, analgesics and neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA)……frequently for more than 7 days» [1]. Ego manages the drug withdrawal syndrome but does not avoid it.
First, the requirements allowing for optimal ventilation in the setting of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), delineated earlier [2,3,4], are not addressed: (Vt, f) = f(temperature, agitation, inflammation, lung water, pH, microcirculation, PaCO2, PaO2, positioning). Briefly, temperature is lowered to low normal (35–36 °C). Alpha-2 agonists suppress the tonic activity of the dorsal noradrenergic bundle [5], control agitation and avoid emergence delirium and withdrawal syndrome [6] («cooperative » sedation from endotracheal intubation onward, i.e., alpha-2 agonist as first-line sedative [7]: clonidine 2 μg kg−1 h−1 or dexmedetomidine 1.5 μg kg−1 h−1). To achieve −2 < RASS < 0 (stringent restlessness), alpha-2 agonists are supplemented with neuroleptics, if required (appendix in [8]), as in refractory delirium tremens [9]. Both drugs do not depress respiratory genesis [10]. Thus, conventional sedation is not needed following intubation. Adequate iterative circulatory optimization combined to the sympatholysis evoked by alpha-2 agonists normalizes the microcirculation, systemic pH, lactate concentration, CO2 gap and venous O2 saturation. Alpha-2 agonists present anti-inflammatory properties [11], either at the systemic or central nervous system or lung (tissue or receptors) level. In turn, normalized microcirculation eases diapedesis and improves the innate immune function: a return to normal functioning of the adrenergic receptors of immune cells possibly occurs (“upregulation”).
Second, alpha-2 agonists act via the sympathetic and the parasympathetic systems, beginning with intubation: cooperative sedation [12], with improved cognition [13,14], diuresis, lowered VO2 and inflammation, etc. As alpha-2 agonists evoke indifference to the environment and pain, opioids are counterproductive. Should the patient need analgesia, opioid free analgesia (appendix in [8]) does not depress respiratory genesis. Consequently, the duration of paralysis is reduced to a few hours in the setting of conventional ARDS (e.g., aspiration, etc.). Once the vicious circle of self-induced lung injury (SILI) is broken, spontaneous breathing resumes (e.g., pressure support delineated in [2,3,4]). PEEP is adjusted to a high level if diffuse ARDS is present. Upright position is set, meticulously.
Early COVID-ARDS presents with a high VA/Q ratio (lowered perfusion with near-normal ventilation, compliance, and lung mechanics). The inflammation of the lung capillaries and receptors and alveoli is addressed non-specifically. As COVID-19 does not weaken the ventilatory muscles, and as compliance is relatively high, brief paralysis just breaks the SILI and the high inspiratory drive. Spontaneous breathing avoids ventilator-induced lung injury. First-line, high-dose alpha-2 agonists combined to low normal temperature and normalized inflammation do not lead to «high regimen and prolonged use of sedative, analgesics and neuromuscular agents» [1]. In our hands [3], breaking up the SILI is achieved within 2 days with a low toll (mortality: 8.5% [3]), at variance with general anesthesia, paralysis and proning for weeks with critical care clogging and societal consequences. This [3,4] requires demonstration.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: F.P., M.d.K., M.G. and L.Q.; writing—original draft preparation, F.P., M.d.K., M.G. and L.Q.; writing—review and editing, F.P., M.d.K., M.G. and L.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

L. Quintin received honoraria and unrestricted research grants from Boehringer-Ingelheim, France; UCB Pharma, Belgium; and Abbott International, Chicago, Il (1986-96), and holds US patent 8 703 697: method for treating early severe diffuse acute respiratory distress syndrome. The off-label use of dexmedetomidine and clonidine is disclosed. The other authors report no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ego, A.; Halenarova, K.; Creteur, J.; Taccone, F.S. How to Manage Withdrawal of Sedation and Analgesia in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients? J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Petitjeans, F.; Pichot, C.; Ghignone, M.; Quintin, L. Early severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: What's going on? Part II: Controlled vs. spontaneous ventilation? Anaesthesiol. Intensive 2016, 48, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Petitjeans, F.; Martinez, J.; Danguy des Deserts, M.; Leroy, S.; Quintin, L.; Escarment, J. A centrally acting antihypertensive, clonidine, sedates patients presenting with acute res-piratory distress syndrome evoked by SARS-coronavirus 2. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 48, e991–e993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Petitjeans, F.; Leroy, S.; Pichot, C.; Ghignone, M.; Quintin, L.; Constantin, J.M. Does Interrupting Self-Induced Lung Injury and Respiratory Drive Expedite Early Spontaneous Breathing in the Setting of Early Severe Diffuse Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome? Crit. Care Med. 2021. Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Saunier, C.F.; Akaoka, H.; de La Chapelle, B.; Charlety, P.J.; Chergui, K.; Chouvet, G.; Buda, M.; Quintin, L. Activation of brain noradrenergic neurons during recovery from halothane anesthesia: Persistence of phasic activation after clonidine. Anesthesiology 1993, 79, 1072–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gold, M.S.; Redmond, D.E.; Kleber, H.D. Clonidine blocks acute opiate-withdrawal symptoms. Lancet 1978, 2, 599–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pichot, C.; Ghignone, M.; Quintin, L. Dexmedetomidine and clonidine: From second- to first-line sedative agents in the critical care setting? J. Intensive Care Med. 2012, 27, 219–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Pichot, C.; Longrois, D.; Ghignone, M.; Quintin, L. Dexmédetomidine et clonidine: Revue de leurs propriétés pharmacodynamiques en vue de définir la place des agonistes alpha-2 adrénergiques dans la sédation en réanimation. Ann. Françaises D'anesthésie Réanimation 2012, 31, 876–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Carrasco, G.; Baeza, N.; Cabre, L.; Portillo, E.; Gimeno, G.; Manzanedo, D.; Calizaya, M. Dexmedetomidine for the Treatment of Hyperactive Delirium Refractory to Haloperidol in Nonintubated ICU Patients: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. Crit. Care Med. 2016, 44, 1295–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Voituron, N.; Hilaire, G.; Quintin, L. Dexmedetomidine and clonidine induce long-lasting activation of the respiratory rhythm generator of neonatal mice: Possible implication for critical care. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2012, 180, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Petitjeans, F.; Geloen, A.; Pichot, C.; Leroy, S.; Ghignone, M.; Quintin, L. Is the Sympathetic System Detrimental in the Setting of Septic Shock, with Antihypertensive Agents as a Counterintuitive Approach? A Clinical Proposition. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dollery, C.T.; Davies, D.S.; Draffan, G.H.; Dargie, H.J.; Dean, C.R.; Reid, J.L.; Clare, R.A.; Murray, S. Clinical pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of clonidine. Clin. Pharm. 1976, 19, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mirski, M.A.; Lewin, J.J., 3rd; Ledroux, S.; Thompson, C.; Murakami, P.; Zink, E.K.; Griswold, M. Cognitive improvement during continuous sedation in critically ill, awake and responsive patients: The Acute Neurological ICU Sedation Trial (ANIST). Intensive Care Med. 2010, 36, 1505–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Arnsten, A.F.; Jin, L.E. Guanfacine for the treatment of cognitive disorders: A century of discoveries at Yale. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2012, 85, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Petitjeans, F.; de Kock, M.; Ghignone, M.; Quintin, L. Avoiding, Not Managing, Drug Withdrawal Syndrome in the Setting of COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Comment on Ego et al. How to Manage Withdrawal of Sedation and Analgesia in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients? J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4917. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3336. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123336

AMA Style

Petitjeans F, de Kock M, Ghignone M, Quintin L. Avoiding, Not Managing, Drug Withdrawal Syndrome in the Setting of COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Comment on Ego et al. How to Manage Withdrawal of Sedation and Analgesia in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients? J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4917. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(12):3336. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123336

Chicago/Turabian Style

Petitjeans, Fabrice, Marc de Kock, Marco Ghignone, and Luc Quintin. 2022. "Avoiding, Not Managing, Drug Withdrawal Syndrome in the Setting of COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Comment on Ego et al. How to Manage Withdrawal of Sedation and Analgesia in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients? J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4917" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 12: 3336. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123336

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop