Next Article in Journal
Clinical and Laboratory Findings of Nosocomial Sepsis in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants According to Causative Organisms
Next Article in Special Issue
Elevated Levels of Growth/Differentiation Factor-15 in the Aqueous Humor and Serum of Glaucoma Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Extra-Intestinal Manifestations of Celiac Disease: What Should We Know in 2022?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Different Effects of Aging on Intraocular Pressures Measured by Three Different Tonometers
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

360° Ab-Interno Schlemm’s Canal Viscodilation with OMNI Viscosurgical Systems for Open-Angle Glaucoma—Midterm Results

J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(1), 259; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010259
by Giacomo Toneatto 1, Marco Zeppieri 1,*, Veronica Papa 2, Laura Rizzi 3, Carlo Salati 1, Andrea Gabai 1 and Paolo Brusini 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(1), 259; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010259
Submission received: 9 November 2021 / Revised: 6 December 2021 / Accepted: 29 December 2021 / Published: 4 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intraocular Pressure and Ocular Hypertension)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors evaluated the results of 360° dilatation of Schlemm's canal using the OMNI system. More options for less invasive glaucoma surgery would be very beneficial for glaucoma specialists.


If possible, please revise the following two points.


1. Please add any figures or intraoperative images to understand this procedure easily.

2. As there are many other options for MIGS, please describe the advantages or disadvantages of this OMNI system.

Author Response

Please see rebuttal letter attached to address comments made by both Reviewers. Thanks

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This study compared the effect and safety of Viscodilation of SC using OMNI viscosurgical systems alone versus combined with phaco.

The profiles of the demographics are quite different between groups. Statistical analysis is needed in Table 1.

Discussion about the difference between groups in terms of glaucoma type, lens status, and previous surgery and their influence to the results are needed.

 

Author Response

Please see rebuttal letter attached to address comments made by both Reviewers. Thanks

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors addressed the issues raised by this reviewer.

Back to TopTop