Next Article in Journal
Cardiometabolism as an Interlocking Puzzle between the Healthy and Diseased Heart: New Frontiers in Therapeutic Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Adherence with Mask Resupply: A Propensity-Matched Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 10
Issue 4
10.3390/jcm10040722
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gynecologic Malignancies in Children and Adolescents: How Common is the Uncommon?

by
Christoph Wohlmuth
1,* and
Iris Wohlmuth-Wieser
2
1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
2
Department of Dermatology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(4), 722; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040722
Submission received: 4 January 2021 / Revised: 2 February 2021 / Accepted: 10 February 2021 / Published: 12 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics & Gynecology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aim of this study is to assess the projected incidence and prognostic indicators of gynecologic malignancies in the pediatric population. In this population-based retrospective cohort study, girls ≤18 years with ovarian, uterine, cervical, vaginal and vulvar malignancies diagnosed between 2000 and 2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-18 registry. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyze overall survival (OS). The age-adjusted annual incidence of gynecologic malignancies was 6.7 per 1,000,000 females, with neoplasms of the ovary accounting for 87.5%, vagina 4.5%, cervix 3.9%, uterus 2.5% and vulva 1.6% of all gynecologic malignancies. Malignant germ-cell tumors represented the most common ovarian neoplasm, with an increased incidence in children from 5–18 years. Although certain subtypes were associated with advanced disease stages, the 10-year OS rate was 96.0%. Sarcomas accounted for the majority of vaginal, cervical, uterine and vulvar malignancies. The majority of vaginal neoplasms were observed in girls between 0–4 years, and the 10-year OS rate was 86.1%. Overall, gynecologic malignancies accounted for 4.2% of all malignancies in girls aged 0–18 years and the histologic subtypes and prognosis differed significantly from patients in older age groups.

1. Introduction

Malignant neoplasms are the fifth most common cause of death among children and adolescents aged 0–18 years and the third most common cause when excluding infants <1 year [1,2]. Gynecologic malignancies, including ovarian, uterine, cervical, vaginal and vulvar cancer, have been well described in the general population, and treatment guidelines have been tailored to clinical-, stage- and histology-based characteristics [3,4,5,6]. With successful advances in cancer therapy, survival is improving and fertility-preserving treatment options have become a critical aspect in the management of women with cancer in reproductive ages [7]. This aspect is also critical in young girls with cancer, but data on gynecologic malignancies in childhood remains scarce. While prospective trials including GOG-10, 45, 90 and 116 allowed for the inclusion of children and adolescents with certain gynecologic cancer subtypes and analyses from pediatric oncology cooperative groups assessed treatment outcome, there is a paucity of epidemiologic data and real-world prognosis [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
The aim of this study was to systematically describe the epidemiology, histologic types and prognosis of gynecologic malignancies in this age group.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database of the National Cancer Institute was used to identify cases of gynecologic malignancies in children and adolescents. The SEER-18 population (including Atlanta, Connecticut, Detroit, Hawaii, Iowa, New Mexico, San Francisco-Oakland, Seattle-Puget Sound, Utah, Los Angeles, San Jose-Monterey, Rural Georgia, the Alaska Native Tumor Registry, Greater California, Greater Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana and New Jersey) from its November 2018 submission was used. This was limited to cases from 2000–2016 [16].
Patients aged 0–18 years with a diagnosis of invasive cancer of the ovaries, uterus, cervix, vagina and vulva were identified in the SEER*Stat 8.3.6 database, and their clinical data was retrieved. In situ malignancies were excluded. Only patients with known age and listing in the research database were included.
Patients’ age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, ethnicity, site, histology, stage (i.e., localized, regional and distant disease) and survival data were collected. Histologic subtypes were grouped into squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, melanoma, sarcoma, germ-cell tumors and other subtypes/unspecified for vulvar, vaginal, cervical and uterine malignancies. Ovarian neoplasms were classified as epithelial, sex-cord-stromal germ-cell or mesenchymal tumors.
Incidence rates were adjusted for age to the 2000 United States standard population and reported per 1,000,000 women 18 years or younger. Patients with secondary gynecologic cancers were excluded from the survival analysis. The SEER data is publicly available and deidentified and therefore excluded from Ethics Board approval.

2.2. Statistics

Descriptive statistics were used to report demographic data. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann–Whitney-test or Wilcoxon test, as appropriate. More than two groups were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA test. Cross-tables and Chi-square test were used to compare categorical data. The Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test was used to analyze overall survival. Overall survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of death. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Version 26, IBM, Armonk, USA. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Gynecologic malignancies accounted for 4.2% (1255/29,919) of all malignancies in girls ≤ 18 years and 0.3% (1255/382,510) of all gynecologic malignancies in the SEER-18 population occurred in this age group: 1.1% of all ovarian, 1.0% of all vaginal, 0.1% of all cervical, 0.1% of all vulvar and <0.1% of all uterine malignancies were diagnosed in girls ≤18 years.
The age-adjusted incidence of gynecologic malignancies and the relative frequency by organ are shown in Table 1.
Histologic subtypes identified were germ-cell tumors (71.6%), epithelial carcinomas (12.4%), sarcomas (7.9%), sex-cord stromal tumors (6.1%) and other/unspecified subtypes (2.1%). The majority of ovarian neoplasms were germ-cell tumors, whereas sarcomas represented the most common histologic type in uterine, cervical, vaginal and vulvar malignancies. The distribution of histologic subtypes is shown in Figure 1.
Ovarian cancer accounts for 87.5% of gynecologic malignancies in children and adolescents ≤18 years, vaginal cancer 4.5%, cervical cancer 3.9%, uterine cancer 2.5% and vulvar cancer 1.6%. Abbreviations: n.s., not specified.
Age at diagnosis and ethnicity differed significantly between patients with cancers of the ovary, uterus, cervix, vagina and vulva. Age at diagnosis and the relative frequency and standardized incidence ratio of gynecologic malignancies stratified by ethnicity are shown in Table 2. Girls with vaginal cancer were significantly younger than all other organ sites (p < 0.001), and girls with ovarian cancer were significantly younger than those with uterine malignancies (p = 0.011). Age at diagnosis differed between histologic groups (p < 0.001). Girls with sarcomas were significantly younger than all other histologic types (p < 0.001). Girls with germ-cell tumors were significantly younger than girls with epithelial (p < 0.001), sex-cord-stromal tumors (p = 0.026) and other/non-specified histologic types (p = 0.019). The annual incidence of gynecologic cancers by age is shown in Figure 2A. Disease stage differed between gynecologic sites (p = 0.041) and among ovarian neoplasms (Figure 2B,C). Approximately 19% of ovarian and uterine cancers were already metastasized at the time of diagnosis. The majority of cervical, vaginal and vulvar cancers were localized.
The overall prognosis of gynecologic malignancies in girls ≤18 years is good. The 5-year overall survival rate for malignancies of the ovary is 92.4%, uterus 85.9%, cervix 87.2%, vagina 90.8% and vulva 76.9%. The Kaplan–Meier plot of overall survival by organ site is shown in Figure 3A and ovarian, uterine, cervical, vaginal and vulvar cancer by histologic groups in Figure 3B–F.

4. Discussion

In this study, we used the SEER-18 registry representing 27.8% of the US population to characterize the epidemiology, demographics and prognosis of gynecologic malignancies in children and adolescents [16]. We have shown that gynecologic malignancies account for 4.2% of all malignancies in girls ≤18 years. 1.1% of all ovarian cancers and 1.0% of all vaginal cancers in the general population are diagnosed in children and adolescents.
These tumors differ significantly from common gynecologic malignancies encountered in the general population. We have observed a significant difference in the relative frequency of these malignancies among ethnic groups (Table 2). The incidence of cervical cancer was almost three times higher in black and American Indian or Alaska native and two times higher in Hispanic than in white girls. Vaginal cancer was more common in white, black and American Indian or Alaska native than in Hispanic and Asian girls.

4.1. Ovarian Malignancies

While the majority of ‘’adulthood’’ ovarian malignancies are epithelial cancers [17,18], approximately 80% of all ovarian neoplasms in children and adolescents ≤18 years are germ-cell tumors (Figure 1). These cancers are observed with increasing incidence in children from 5–18 years. Although a significant proportion of yolk sac tumors, dysgerminomas and malignant teratomas are diagnosed at advanced disease stages (Figure 2B), the prognosis is excellent, with 5- and 10-year overall survival rates of 97.2% and 96.0% (Figure 3B). Ovarian sarcomas, which are often associated with a poor prognosis, represent a minority of ovarian tumors (Figure 3B). Epithelial and sex-cord-stromal tumors account for approximately 11% and 7%, respectively, and have a 10-year overall survival rate of 67.5% and 67.8%, respectively (Figure 3B). As ovarian malignancies are associated with a good prognosis, fertility-preserving treatment options must be considered for these patients. Data indicate that in appropriately selected cases, these treatments do not compromise oncological safety [19,20]. Staging and optimal patient selection are a prerequisite. Patients should therefore be referred to dedicated cancer centers to facilitate a multidisciplinary assessment and optimized delivery of care [20,21,22]. While amenorrhea is a common side-effect of certain chemotherapy regimens even in younger women, normal menstruation following primary fertility-sparing surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy has been reported in 80-99% of patients with germ-cell tumors [23,24]. In a recently published study of 105 ovarian germ-cell tumor survivors, over 90% of women <40 years of age who desired pregnancy became pregnant and gave birth [25].

4.2. Vaginal Malignancies

Vaginal malignancies represent the second most common gynecologic cancer in this age-group, and the majority (84%) affect children between 0 and 4 years of age (Figure 2A). Sarcomas (mainly embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas) represent the most common histologic subtype (Figure 1), are commonly diagnosed at localized disease stages and are associated with a good prognosis [26]. The 10-year overall survival rate is 86.1% (Figure 3E), which is similar to a sub-analysis of female genital tract rhabdomyomas from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) protocols I–IV [27] and a study combining data from five trials and registry data [11].
Germ-cell (and specifically yolk sac) tumors represent the second most common vaginal histology and have an excellent prognosis. A 10-year overall survival rate of 100% was observed in this cohort. This finding was similar to a recent single-center case series of 16 patients, where all patients, other than one who experienced a treatment-related death, had a complete response without recurrence at a median follow-up of 53 months (range, 19–223) and is similar to the outcome in malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary, where the reported mortality rate was 1.9% over a period of 20 years [14,28].

4.3. Cervical Malignancies

In this study, sarcomas were also found to be the most common histologic subtype of cervical neoplasms. The majority of these were embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas with a similar prognosis (Figure 3D) and treatment approach as vaginal sarcomas [26,27]. The second most common histologic subtype was adenocarcinoma, and 15 of 16 cases were cervical clear cell cancers. A strong association with intra-uterine diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure has been shown [29], but several cases have been reported unrelated to DES, particularly in young patients [30,31,32,33].

4.4. Vulvar Malignancies

The majority of vulvar malignancies were sarcomas, which had a very similar prognosis to vaginal and cervical sarcomas (Figure 3E,F) and were treated in a similar fashion [27,34]. Squamous cell cancer and malignant melanoma of the vulva have a poor prognosis. Vulvar melanomas are associated with more advanced disease stages at diagnosis and worse outcomes than cutaneous melanomas [34,35,36].

4.5. Uterine Malignancies

Uterine malignancies are rare in childhood compared to the general population, where they represent the most common gynecologic cancer [17]. We observed a heterogenous group of sarcomas, adenocarcinomas and choriocarcinomas, the latter being more frequently found in teenagers [37]. Treatment strategies depend on the underlying histology [26].

4.6. Summary

This study included a large series of gynecologic malignancies in children and adolescents using the SEER-18 population and is representative of the North American population. The data are population-based and therefore not limited to single-center experiences, avoiding publication bias. The study is, however, limited by its retrospective design and the use of registry data, which preclude a central pathology review. In addition, the medical treatment approaches used in this population are not reported here. The scope of this study was to investigate the epidemiology, characteristics and real-world prognosis, and is reflected in our results.
Although gynecologic malignancies in children and adolescents are considered rare, they account for 4.2% of all malignancies in girls aged 0–18 years. Approximately 1% of all ovarian and vaginal cancers encountered in the general population affect this age group. The histologic subtypes of the reported pediatric malignancies differ from the commonly reported gynecologic cancers in the adult population. Treatment decisions should be based on a multi-disciplinary evaluation including pediatric and gynecologic oncologists. With regards to ovarian cancers, germ cell tumors represent the most common ovarian neoplasm. In vulvo-vaginal, uterine and cervical malignancies, sarcomas represent the most common subtype compared to squamous and adenocarcinomas in the adult populations. Overall survival in this study was found to be excellent; therefore, counseling for fertility preserving therapies is encouraged.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: C.W.; Methodology: C.W., I.W.-W.; Analysis and Data curation: C.W., I.W.-W.; Writing: C.W., I.W.-W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Iris Wohlmuth-Wieser is supported by a grant from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), project number J-4382. Open access funding was provided by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The SEER data is publicly available and deidentified and therefore excluded from Ethics Board approval.

Informed Consent Statement

The SEER data is publicly available and deidentified and therefore informed consent was not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The SEER data is publicly available [16].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cunningham, R.M.; Walton, M.A.; Carter, P.M. The major causes of death in children and adolescents in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 2468–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. CDC Wonder. Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER). Available online: https://wonder.cdc.gov/ (accessed on 29 November 2020).
  3. Morgan, R.J.; Armstrong, D.K.; Alvarez, R.D.; Bakkum-Gamez, J.N.; Behbakht, K.; Chen, L.-M.; Copeland, L.; Crispens, M.A.; DeRosa, M.; Dorigo, O.; et al. Ovarian cancer, version 1.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2016, 14, 1134–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Koh, W.-J.; Abu-Rustum, N.R.; Bean, S.; Bradley, K.; Campos, S.M.; Cho, K.R.; Chon, H.S.; Chu, C.; Clark, R.; Cohn, D.; et al. Cervical cancer, version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2019, 17, 64–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Koh, W.-J.; Abu-Rustum, N.R.; Bean, S.; Bradley, K.; Campos, S.M.; Cho, K.R.; Chon, H.S.; Chu, C.; Cohn, D.; Crispens, M.A.; et al. Uterine neoplasms, version 1.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2018, 16, 170–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Koh, W.-J.; Greer, B.E.; Abu-Rustum, N.R.; Campos, S.M.; Cho, K.R.; Chon, H.S.; Chu, C.; Cohn, D.; Crispens, M.A.; Dizon, D.S.; et al. Vulvar Cancer, Version 1.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2017, 15, 92–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Dolmans, M.-M. Recent advances in fertility preservation and counseling for female cancer patients. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2018, 18, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Slayton, R.E.; Park, R.C.; Silverberg, S.G.; Shingleton, H.; Creasman, W.T.; Blessing, J.A. Vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide in the treatment of malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary. A gynecologic oncology group study (a final report). Cancer 1985, 56, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Williams, S.; Blessing, J.; Moore, D.; Homesley, H.; Adcock, L. Cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin in advanced and recurrent ovarian germ-cell tumors. A trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 1990, 31, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Williams, S.D.; Kauderer, J.; Burnett, A.F.; Lentz, S.S.; Aghajanian, C.; Armstrong, D.K. Adjuvant therapy of completely resected dysgerminoma with carboplatin and etoposide: A trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol. Oncol. 2004, 95, 496–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sparber-Sauer, M.; Matle, M.; Vokuhl, C.; Hallmen, E.; Von Kalle, T.; Münter, M.; Timmermann, B.; Bielack, S.S.; Klingebiel, T.; Koscielniak, E.; et al. Rhabdomyosarcoma of the female genitourinary tract: Primary and relapsed disease in infants and older children. Treatment results of five Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS) trials and one registry. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2021, e28889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Minard-Colin, V.; Walterhouse, D.; Bisogno, G.; Martelli, H.; Anderson, J.; Rodeberg, D.A.; Ferrari, A.; Jenney, M.; Wolden, S.; De Salvo, G.; et al. Localized vaginal/uterine rhabdomyosarcoma-results of a pooled analysis from four international cooperative groups. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2018, 65, e27096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Martelli, H.; Oberlin, O.; Rey, A.; Godzinski, J.; Spicer, R.D.; Bouvet, N.; Haie-Meder, C.; Terrier-Lacombe, M.-J.; De Toledo, J.S.; Spooner, D.; et al. Conservative treatment for girls with nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma of the genital tract: A report from the study committee of the International Society of Pediatric Oncology. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999, 17, 2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Calaminus, G.; Schneider, D.T.; Von Schweinitz, D.; Jürgens, H.; Infed, N.; Schönberger, S.; Olson, T.A.; Albers, P.; Vokuhl, C.; Stein, R.; et al. Age-dependent presentation and clinical course of 1465 patients aged 0 to less than 18 years with ovarian or testicular germ cell tumors; Data of the MAKEI 96 protocol revisited in the light of prenatal germ cell biology. Cancers 2020, 12, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Pommert, L.; Bradley, W. Pediatric gynecologic cancers. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 19, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. SEER * Stat Version 8.3.8: SEER 18 Registries, November 2018 Sub. (2000–2016). Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov (accessed on 21 December 2020).
  17. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019, 69, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Dikshit, R.; Eser, S.; Mathers, C.; Rebelo, M.; Parkin, D.M.; Forman, D.; Bray, F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int. J. Cancer 2014, 136, E359–E386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chan, J.K.; Tewari, K.S.; Waller, S.; Ba, M.K.C.; Shin, J.Y.; Osann, K.; Kapp, D.S. The influence of conservative surgical practices for malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. J. Surg. Oncol. 2008, 98, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ray-Coquard, I.; Morice, P.; Lorusso, D.; Prat, J.; Oaknin, A.; Pautier, P.; Colombo, N. Non-epithelial ovarian cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2018, 29, iv1–iv18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Brown, J.; Friedlander, M.; Backes, F.J.; Harter, P.; O’Connor, D.M.; Rouge, T.D.L.M.; Lorusso, D.; Maenpaa, J.; Kim, J.-W.; Tenney, M.E.; et al. Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) consensus review for ovarian germ cell tumors. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2014, 24, S48–S54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ray-Coquard, I.; Brown, J.; Harter, P.; Provencher, D.M.; Fong, P.C.; Maenpaa, J.; Ledermann, J.A.; Emons, G.; Rigaud, D.B.; Glasspool, R.M.; et al. Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus review for ovarian sex cord stromal tumors. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2014, 24, S42–S47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gershenson, D.M. Management of ovarian germ cell tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007, 25, 2938–2943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jacobson, M.H.; Mertens, A.C.; Spencer, J.B.; Manatunga, A.K.; Howards, P.P. Menses resumption after cancer treatment–induced amenorrhea occurs early or not at all. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 105, 765–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Tamauchi, S.; Kajiyama, H.; Yoshihara, M.; Ikeda, Y.; Yoshikawa, N.; Nishino, K.; Utsumi, F.; Niimi, K.; Suzuki, S.; Kikkawa, F. Reproductive outcomes of 105 malignant ovarian germ cell tumor survivors: A multicenter study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 219, 385.e1–385.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lautz, T.B.; Martelli, H.; Fuchs, J.; Chargari, C.; Smeulders, N.; Granberg, C.F.; Wolden, S.L.; Sparber-Sauer, M.; Hawkins, D.S.; Bisogno, G.; et al. Local treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma of the female genital tract: Expert consensus from the Children’s Oncology Group, the European Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Group, and the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Arndt, C.A.; Donaldson, S.S.; Anderson, J.R.; Andrassy, R.J.; Laurie, F.; Link, M.P.; Raney, R.B.; Maurer, H.M.; Crist, W.M. What constitutes optimal therapy for patients with rhabdomyosarcoma of the female genital tract? Cancer 2001, 91, 2454–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yuan, Z.; Cao, D.; Yang, J.; Keng, S.; Huang, H. Vaginal yolk sac tumors: Our experiences and results. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2017, 27, 1489–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Huo, D.; Anderson, D.; Palmer, J.R.; Herbst, A.L. Incidence rates and risks of diethylstilbestrol-related clear-cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina and cervix: Update after 40-year follow-up. Gynecol. Oncol. 2017, 146, 566–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Baykara, M.; Benekli, M.; Erdem, O.; Taskiran, C.; Demirci, U.; Vargol, E.; Gunaydin, Y.; Coskun, U.; Ozet, A.; Buyukberber, S. Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: A case report and review of the literature. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 2014, 36, e131–e133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Lester, F.C.; Farmer, D.L.; Rabban, J.T.; Chen, L.-M. Radical trachelectomy for clear cell carcinoma of the cervix in a 6-year old: A case report, review, and description of the surgical technique. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2010, 45, e1–e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ahrens, W.A.; Barrón-Rodriguez, L.P.; McKee, M.; Rivkees, S.; Reyes-Múgica, M. Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the cervix in a child without in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol: A case report and review of the literature. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. 2005, 8, 690–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Abu-Rustum, N.R.; Su, W.; Levine, D.A.; Boyd, J.; Sonoda, Y.; Laquaglia, M.P. Pediatric radical abdominal trachelectomy for cervical clear cell carcinoma: A novel surgical approach. Gynecol. Oncol. 2005, 97, 296–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wohlmuth, C.; Wohlmuth-Wieser, I. Vulvar malignancies: An interdisciplinary perspective. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2019, 17, 1257–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Wohlmuth, C.; Wohlmuth-Wieser, I.; May, T.; Vicus, D.; Gien, L.T.; LaFramboise, S. Malignant melanoma of the vulva and vagina: A US population-based study of 1863 patients. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 2019, 21, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Wohlmuth, C.; Wohlmuth-Wieser, I.; Laframboise, S. Clinical characteristics and treatment response with checkpoint inhibitors in malignant melanoma of the vulva and vagina. J. Low. Genit. Tract Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Brinton, L.A.; Bracken, M.B.; Connelly, R.R. Choriocarcinoma incidence in the United States. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1986, 123, 1094–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcm 10 00722 g001 550
Figure 1. Distribution of gynecologic malignancies according to histology.
Figure 1. Distribution of gynecologic malignancies according to histology.
Jcm 10 00722 g001
Jcm 10 00722 g002 550
Figure 2. (A–C) Annual incidence of gynecologic malignancies by age from 0–18 years and distribution of disease stage at diagnosis. Abbreviations: n.a., not applicable. (A) The graph illustrates the annual incidence of ovarian, vaginal, cervical, uterine and vulvar cancer by age groups from 0–18 years per 1,000,000 women. (B) Distribution of disease stage of ovarian, vaginal, cervical, uterine and vulvar cancer in children and adolescents from 0–18 years of age. (C) Distribution of disease stage in ovarian malignancies by underlying histologic subtype in the same cohort. Abbreviations: G.C., germ-cell.
Figure 2. (A–C) Annual incidence of gynecologic malignancies by age from 0–18 years and distribution of disease stage at diagnosis. Abbreviations: n.a., not applicable. (A) The graph illustrates the annual incidence of ovarian, vaginal, cervical, uterine and vulvar cancer by age groups from 0–18 years per 1,000,000 women. (B) Distribution of disease stage of ovarian, vaginal, cervical, uterine and vulvar cancer in children and adolescents from 0–18 years of age. (C) Distribution of disease stage in ovarian malignancies by underlying histologic subtype in the same cohort. Abbreviations: G.C., germ-cell.
Jcm 10 00722 g002
Jcm 10 00722 g003 550
Figure 3. (A–F) Kaplan–Meier plots for 5- and 10-year overall survival for children and adolescents with gynecologic malignancies. (C) The survival curves of germ-cell tumor and choriocarcinoma are overlapping. (E) The survival curves of adenocarcinomas and germ-cell tumors are overlapping. Abbreviations: n.s., not specified; OS, overall survival.
Figure 3. (A–F) Kaplan–Meier plots for 5- and 10-year overall survival for children and adolescents with gynecologic malignancies. (C) The survival curves of germ-cell tumor and choriocarcinoma are overlapping. (E) The survival curves of adenocarcinomas and germ-cell tumors are overlapping. Abbreviations: n.s., not specified; OS, overall survival.
Jcm 10 00722 g003
Table
Table 1. Age-adjusted incidence and relative frequency of gynecologic malignancies among children and adolescents 0–18 years of age.
Table 1. Age-adjusted incidence and relative frequency of gynecologic malignancies among children and adolescents 0–18 years of age.
Type of MalignancyIncidence per 1,000,000 Women (95% CI)Relative Frequency %
All gynecologic malignancies6.719 (6.352–7.101)100%
Ovarian malignancies5.882 (5.540–6.241)87.5%
Uterine malignancies0.170 (0.116–0.240)2.5%
Cervical malignancies0.262 (0.193–0.346)3.9%
Vaginal malignancies0.298 (0.225–0.388)4.5%
Vulvar malignancies0.106 (0.065–0.164)1.6%
Incidence adjusted to the 2000 United States standard population. Relative frequency of cancer among all gynecologic malignancies in children and adolescents 0–18 years of age.
Table
Table 2. Demographic characteristics by organ.
Table 2. Demographic characteristics by organ.
ParameterOvary (n = 1098)Uterus (n = 32)Cervix (n = 49)Vagina (n = 56)Vulva (n = 20)p
Age (years)
Mean age ± SD13.7 ± 3.715.3 ± 4.015.0 ± 3.23.4 ± 4.811.5± 6.9<0.001
Median age (range)15.0 (0–18)16.5 (1–18)16.0 (6–18)1.5 (0–17)15.5 (1–18)
Ethnicity (%)
White41.0%43.8%30.6%58.9%45.0%0.029
Black13.9%12.5%26.5%17.9%5.0%
Hispanic33.8%40.6%36.7%16.1%45.0%
Asian or Pacific Islander9.5%3.1%0.0%5.4%5.0%
American Indian or Alaska Native0.6%0.0%2.0%1.8%0.0%
Unknown1.2%0.0%4.1%0.0%0.0%
Ethnicity (Incidence per 1,000,000)
White4.9660.1510.1640.3830.098
Black5.8300.1530.4880.4000.040
Hispanic7.1480.2530.3460.1530.167n.a.
Asian or Pacific Islander6.5150.06100.1860.062
American Indian or Alaska Native3.46200.4990.4980
Incidence adjusted to the 2000 United States standard population. Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wohlmuth, C.; Wohlmuth-Wieser, I. Gynecologic Malignancies in Children and Adolescents: How Common is the Uncommon? J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 722. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040722

AMA Style

Wohlmuth C, Wohlmuth-Wieser I. Gynecologic Malignancies in Children and Adolescents: How Common is the Uncommon? Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(4):722. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040722

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wohlmuth, Christoph, and Iris Wohlmuth-Wieser. 2021. "Gynecologic Malignancies in Children and Adolescents: How Common is the Uncommon?" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 4: 722. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040722

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop