Next Article in Journal
Effect of TiO2 and Al2O3 Addition on the Performance of Chitosan/Phosphotungstic Composite Membranes for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
A Simple, Semi-Quantitative Acyl Biotin Exchange-Based Method to Detect Protein S-Palmitoylation Levels
Previous Article in Journal
Calcium Alginate Production through Forward Osmosis with Reverse Solute Diffusion and Mechanism Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Interaction Energy between Two Separated Charged Spheres Surrounded Inside and Outside by Electrolyte
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Membranes
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/membranes13020208
membranes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of a Pseudomonas Strain on the Lipid Transfer Proteins, Appoplast Barriers and Activity of Aquaporins Associated with Hydraulic Conductance of Pea Plants

by
Elena Martynenko
1,
Tatiana Arkhipova
1,
Guzel Akhiyarova
1,
Guzel Sharipova
1,
Ilshat Galin
1,
Oksana Seldimirova
1,
Ruslan Ivanov
1,
Tatiana Nuzhnaya
1,*,
Ekaterina Finkina
2,
Tatiana Ovchinnikova
2 and
Guzel Kudoyarova
1
1
Ufa Institute of Biology, Ufa Federal Research Centre, RAS, Prospekt Oktyabrya, 69, 450054 Ufa, Russia
2
Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Miklukho-Maklaya Str., 16/10, 117997 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2023, 13(2), 208; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13020208
Submission received: 27 October 2022 / Revised: 23 January 2023 / Accepted: 2 February 2023 / Published: 8 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane Interaction between Lipids, Proteins and Peptides)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) are known to be involved in suberin deposition in the Casparian bands of pea roots, thereby reinforcing apoplast barriers. Moreover, the Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14 strain accelerated formation of the Casparian bands in wheat plants, although involvement of LTPs in the process was not studied. Here, we investigated the effects of P. mandelii IB-Ki14 on LTPs, formation of the Casparian bands, hydraulic conductance and activity of aquaporins (AQPs) in pea plants. RT PCR showed a 1.6-1.9-fold up-regulation of the PsLTP-coding genes and an increase in the abundance of LTP proteins in the phloem of pea roots induced by the treatment with P. mandelii IB-Ki14. The treatment was accompanied with increased deposition of suberin in the Casparian bands. Hydraulic conductance did not decrease in association with the bacterial treatment despite strengthening of the apoplast barriers. At the same time, the Fenton reagent, serving as an AQPs inhibitor, decreased hydraulic conductance to a greater extent in treated plants relative to the control group, indicating an increase in the AQP activity by the bacteria. We hypothesize that P. mandelii IB-Ki14 stimulates deposition of suberin, in the biosynthesis of which LTPs are involved, and increases aquaporin activity, which in turn prevents a decrease in hydraulic conductance due to formation of the apoplast barriers in pea roots.

1. Introduction

The presence of the plant-growth-promoting (PGP) bacteria in the rhizosphere stimulates plant growth and increases their productivity in both favorable and stressful conditions [1,2,3,4]. While many different mechanisms of bacterial effect on plants have been actively researched, one aspect of the PGP bacteria interactions with plants has received less attention. This aspect is bacteria-induced changes in the formation of the apoplast barriers and their effect on the water transport in plants. These barriers are located in the endodermis and exodermis, where they appear as the suberin and lignin in Casparian bands [5]. Casparian bands and suberin lamellae are considered as key selection targets for breeding drought- and salt-tolerant crops, since the apoplast barriers prevent uncontrolled transport of water and solutes into plants [6]. The apoplastic barriers also protect plants from pathogen infection [7].
Recent research has demonstrated a connection between deposition of suberin and the salt-induced increase in abundance of the lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) in pea [8]. These proteins reversibly bind phospholipids and fatty acids (including suberin precursors) within their hydrophobic cavity, thus participating in their transfer between membranes and transport both within the cell and in the apoplast [9,10]. Expression of many LTPs can be induced by multiple biotic and abiotic stressors ([11] and references therein). We recently showed that inoculation of the rhizosphere of the durum wheat with a plant-growth-promoting Pseudomonas mandelii strain enhanced deposition of suberin and lignin while decreasing sodium accumulation under the conditions of elevated salinity [12]. However, the effects of these bacteria on the LTP levels in pea plants have not been studied.
Increased suberin deposition in the apoplast is beneficial for plants under salt stress conditions as a mechanism that limits apoplast permeability and delivery of toxic ions with the transpiration flow. It was shown that the aliphatic suberin confers salt tolerance to Arabidopsis by limiting Na+ influx [13]. However, the apoplast barriers decrease hydraulic conductance. For example, a growth-limiting supply of phosphate caused significant decreases in root hydraulic conductivity, while the formation of the apoplast barriers increased [14]. Quantification of several permeability parameters in the roots showed that suberin represents a major barrier for water flow [5]. Decreased hydraulic conductance leads to stomatal closure [15], which limits gas exchange and photosynthesis [16], while a high transpiration rate correlates with increased crop yields under favorable conditions [17]. It was suggested that restriction of water flow through the apoplast pathway may be eliminated by an enhancement of the cell-to-cell pathway through the membrane water channels—aquaporins (AQPs) [18]. In accordance with this suggestion, we demonstrated that bacteria-induced strengthening of the apoplast barriers was accompanied by increased abundance of AQPs in the roots of barley plants [19]. It was of interest to find out if bacterial inoculation influences the LTP abundance and deposition of suberin and how these effects may be related to AQP activity and hydraulic conductance of pea plants. Contribution of AQPs to the hydraulic conductivity of pea plants was previously demonstrated in the experiments showing a decrease in the average water transport rate induced by an AQP inhibitor [20]. However, this effect was not associated with formation of the apoplast barriers. Given all of the above, the aim of the present research was to elucidate the possible effects of a bacterial inoculation on the LTP abundance in unstressed pea plants and its association with suberin deposition, formation of the apoplast barriers and hydraulic conductance. We aimed to test the hypothesis that a decline in hydraulic conductance due to enhanced formation of the apoplast barriers can be compensated by an increased activity of AQPs.
The Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14 strain was chosen for inoculation of pea rhizosphere, since it had been previously effective in stimulating suberin and lignin deposition in wheat plants [12]. The effects of bacterial inoculation on the abundance of abscisic acid (ABA) were also recorded, since this hormone is known to influence both suberin deposition in pea [21] and rice [22] and AQP abundance [23,24].
Summarizing the above, the aim of this work was (1) to find out whether bacterial inoculation affects the level of expression of genes encoding LTPs and the content of the corresponding proteins in pea plants, (2) to reveal the relationship between the level of LTP and deposition of suberin, and (3) to test the hypothesis that changes in hydraulic conductance due to formation of apoplastic barriers can be compensated by changes in AQP activity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strain and Cultural Media

Gram-negative bacteria Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14 (All-Russian Collection of Microorganisms B-3250) from the collection of microorganisms of the Ufa Institute of Biology of the UFIC RAS (Ufa, Russia) were used for inoculation of plants. Bacteria were cultivated in Erlenmeyer flasks with King’s B medium (2% peptone, 1% glycerol, 0.15% K2HPO4, 0.15% MgSO4·7H2O) on a shaker Innova 40R (New Brunswick, NJ, USA) (160 rpm) for 48 h at 28 °C.

2.2. Plant Growth Conditions and Treatments

Plants of Pisum sativum (cultivar “Sacharniy 2”) were used in the experiments. Seeds of the garden pea were sterilized by placing in a solution of 96% ethanol/3% H2O2 (1:1, v/v) for 5 min and then repeatedly washed with distilled water. Seeds were soaked in the distilled water for 24 h (with aeration for improved seed germination) and then wrapped in wet filter paper to germinate in the dark at room temperature for two days.
The plants were grown in pots (five pea seedlings per pot) with sand. To ensure drainage, a layer of gravel was placed at the bottom of pots with a volume of 500 cm3. After installing a glass tube for gas exchange, the pots were filled with 0.55 kg of sand sterilized by calcinations to exclude the presence of undesirable bacteria and 110 mL of 10% Hoagland–Arnon solution was added. Three-day-old seedlings (root length 1.5 cm, coleoptile length 0.5 cm) were planted and inoculated with 2 mL of the bacterial suspension of P. mandelii IB-Ki14 per seedlings (108 CFU/mL). A subset of the plants grown in sand without the introduced bacteria was used as a control.
The plants were grown at an irradiance of 400–500 μmol m−2 s−1 PAR (ZN-500 and DNAT-400 lamps), 14 h photoperiod and 24/18 °C (day/night). Sand moisture was maintained at 80% of the water-holding capacity of sand by watering the pots daily with distilled water. The amount of water required for irrigation was calculated by weighing the pots.

2.3. RNA Extraction and Analysis of the Abundance of LTP mRNA

RNA was extracted from roots using the TRIzol™ Reagent (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Potentially contaminated DNA was digested with DNaseI (Synthol, Moscow, Russia) and first-strand cDNA was synthesized using the M−MLV reverse transcriptase (Fermentas, Waltham, MA, USA). Oligo(dT)15 was used as a primer, and the reverse transcription reagents were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h in a total volume of 25 μL. After tenfold dilution, 2 μL of the synthesized cDNA was used for the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Primers for the qPCR were designed based on the cDNA sequence [25] using the PrimerQuest™ tool. The primers used for quantitative analysis of Ps-LTP1, Ps-LTP2 and Ps-LTP3 are given in Table 1.
The real-time qPCR was performed using EvaGreenI reagents (Synthol, Moscow, Russia) and a QuantStudio™5 Real-Time PCR System produced by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The qPCR protocol was as follows: 95 °C for 5 min; 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and at 60 °C for 20 s and 72 °C 30 s. After the final PCR cycle, a melting curve analysis was conducted to determine the specificity of the reaction (at 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min and 95 °C for 15 s). The efficiency of each primer pair was determined using a 10-fold cDNA dilution series to reliably determine the fold changes. The β-tubulin gene was chosen as an internal control to normalize the amount of total RNA present in each reaction (Table 1). All reactions, including the non-template control, were performed three times. To determine the relative amount of mRNA for LTP, cycle threshold (CT) values were obtained using the CFX Connect real-time PCR Detection System software tool (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). To normalize the expression of the target gene, the difference between the CT of the LTP gene and the CT of β-tubulin (∆CT value) was calculated. Three independent biological replicates were performed for each variant of the experiment.

2.4. Immunolocalization of LTPs and the ABA

For immunolocalization of LTPs and the ABA, pieces cut from the basal part of the plant roots were fixed in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.4 containing 4% N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N’-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 12 h at 4 °C and then in 4% paraformaldehyde (Riedel de Haen, Seelze, Germany) and 0.1% glutaraldehyde (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany). Fixed root tissues were then washed three times with phosphate buffer and after dehydration in a series of increasing ethanol concentrations were embedded in the JB4 resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). Histological cross-sections (slices) with a thickness of 1.5 μm were obtained on a rotary microtome (HM 325, MICROM Laborgerate, Walldorf, Germany).
After applying blocking solution for 30 min (PBS containing 0.2% gelatin and 0.05% Tween-20), root cross-sections were incubated with the polyclonal rabbit anti-LTP (1:200 dilution) or anti-ABA (1:80 dilution) sera overnight at 4 °C. The interaction of polyclonal rabbit anti-LTP antiserum with pea LTPs was previously evaluated using Western blotting and ELISA assays [25,26]. Specificity of immunostaining for ABA has been confirmed by increased staining in the plants treated with exogenous ABA (positive control) as well as by decreased staining in the case of ABA-deficient mutant (negative control) [24].
The root slices were then washed three times in PBS with 0.05% Tween-20 followed by 3 h of incubation at 37 °C with anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 555 (Invitrogen, Rockford, IL, USA). The slices were additionally rinsed five times with PBS, covered with glass and then imaged by confocal microscopy using an FV3000 Fluoview (FV31-HSD) (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and laser excitation line of 561 nm. Fluorescence emission was detected at 568 nm. Detection occurred in the integration frame mode for imaging with a count of 4.

2.5. Suberin Detection

Freehand cross-sections from the basal part of the plant roots were stained with an alcoholic solution of Sudan III (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) to reveal development of the Casparian bands [27]. Suberized tissues were stained dark orange. The date of sampling was chosen on the basis of previous experiments with salt treatment of pea plants, which showed increased deposition of suberin [8,21].

2.6. Parameters of Water Relations

On the 7th day after the inoculation, 50 mL of Fenton’s reagent (solution of hydrogen peroxide with ferrous iron: a mixture of Fe2+ 0.83 g/L and 100 μL of 30% H2O2) was added to half of the pots with control pea plants and plants inoculated with P. mandelii to inhibit aquaporins. Fenton reaction produces highly reactive hydroxide radicals, which react with aquaporins (and other proteins), thereby disrupting their function [28]. In the plants treated with Fenton reagent, parameters of water relations were measured simultaneously with the control plants.
All measurements were taken on the same 7th day after inoculation.
To measure transpiration, pots with plants (5 pots per variant of treatment) were covered with a polyethylene film with holes for plants to prevent evaporation from the surface, and transpiration was assessed gravimetrically as pot weight loss measured every 10 min for 1 h.
When a decline in transpiration was detected in the plants treated with Fenton reagent, water potential of disks cut from the differentiated leaves was measured with a psychrometer (PSYPRO, Wescor, Logan, UT, USA). Hydraulic conductance of the water transport pathway from roots to leaves was calculated as described [21,29], using the formula: L = T/[(Ψs − Ψl)], where T is the transpiration measured during the last 10 min before sampling to measure the water potential, and Ψs and Ψl are the water potentials of the nutrient solution and leaf, respectively.

2.7. Statistics

The data were statistically processed using standard MS Excel programs. Figures show means and their standard errors (s.e.). The significance of differences was assessed by t-test or ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test (p ≤ 0.05).

3. Results

To achieve the first stated objective, we examined the effects of bacterial inoculation on the expression of the LTP encoding genes. Quantitative PCR showed that bacterial treatment significantly increased the relative amount of Ps-LTP1 (1.6-fold) and Ps-LTP2 (1.9-fold) transcripts compared to the control (Figure 1). Increase in Ps-LTP3 transcript abundance was statistically non-significant.
Next, it was important to follow bacterial effects on LTP abundance. Immunostaining of the root cross-sections of the control pea plants revealed weak fluorescence corresponding to a low abundance of LTPs (Figure 2a). Bacterial treatment increased the brightness of fluorescence, especially in the phloem region where LTPs were present in the cell walls (Figure 2b,c).
Effects of bacteria on deposition of suberin were studied to establish the existence of a relationship between the abundance of LTPs and formation of apoplast barriers. In contrast to control plants untreated with bacteria, suberin deposition in the endoderm region (dark orange coloration) was visible in the root sections of the plants treated with Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14 (Figure 3).
Since the deposition of suberin and LTP was associated with the level of ABA in previous experiments [8], the effect of bacteria on the content of ABA in root cells was studied. ABA immunostaining with specific serum against this hormone revealed fluorescence corresponding to the presence of ABA in and around root cells. Fluorescence was brighter in the phloem and xylem located in the central root cylinder than in the cortex cells (Figure 4). There was no apparent difference between the control and treatment groups in the ABA level in the roots (Figure 4).
In further experiments, we studied the effects of bacteria-induced changes in the formation of apoplastic barriers on hydraulic conductance.
The leaf water potential was not affected by bacterial inoculation (Figure 5). Inhibition of the AQP activity by Fenton’s reagent decreased leaf hydration in both treatments, although the effect was greater in the inoculated plants (70% versus 30%).
Hydraulic conductance was not decreased by inoculation (Figure 6) but was lowered by inhibition of the AQP activity, although only in the inoculated plants.

4. Discussion

In the present research, we found that inoculation of the pea rhizosphere with Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14 up-regulated expression of the genes encoding for LTPs, which was accompanied with an increase in the abundance of LTPs and enhanced deposition of suberin in the apoplast barriers. LTPs belong to a protein family of basic polypeptides of 9 kDa, widely distributed throughout the plant kingdom [30]. Initially, these proteins attracted the attention of researchers due to their role as pan-allergens in plant-derived food [31]. More recently, there has been a growing appreciation of the critical importance of this family of proteins in plant development and consequently research efforts focused on the unresolved questions related to their subcellular localization, expression profile and biological function [32].
One of the functions attributed to LTPs has been the intracellular lipid shuttling [33]. Our results support involvement of the pea LTPs in suberin deposition probably due to their ability to transfer hydrophobic substances including suberin precursors [10]. LTPs bind monomeric lipids in a hydrophobic pocket and transfer them through an aqueous phase [34]. LTPs have been involved in hydrophobic barrier synthesis, facilitating the transfer of precursors of lipid polymers in the apoplastic space [9]. The expression pattern of the LTP genes and extracellular localization of the proteins pointed to their role in cell wall suberization [35]. The gene encoding rice LTP2 was active in suberin-forming tissues such as roots [36]. In our previous immunohistochemical study of LTP localization, we found LTPs in the cell walls of phloem [8,21], which is in agreement with the present work. Our data suggest involvement of LTPs in the passage of suberin precursors through the hydrophilic cell wall to enable suberin deposition in the apoplast and phloem unloading. The phloem is a major pathway for assimilates and other nutrients. However, the phloem transport of lipids has been given little attention [37], since the presence of hydrophobic substances was not expected in the hydrophilic phase of sieve elements. At the same time, a discovery of lipids bound to proteins in human blood [38] raises the possibility that lipids and their respective lipid-binding proteins in the phloem may have similar functions in plants. This is supported by several reports showing the presence of LTPs and lipids in the phloem [39,40]. Proteomics of the phloem exudates showed increased content of LTPs during drought in tomato plants [41].
The effects of microorganisms on the level of LTPs in plants have been demonstrated in several reports. For instance, the Arabidopsis LTP3 gene transcript accumulated in response to the pathogenic Pseudomonas strain [42]. Transcript accumulation of the LTP4 in tobacco was increased in response to wounding and infection with Ralstonia solanacearum [43]. Mutation of the gene encoding for a lipid transfer protein altered cuticular lipid composition in the Arabidopsis and enhanced its susceptibility to infection by a fungal pathogen [44]. Moreover, LTP genes were expressed in legume roots and nodules, while RT-qPCR assays showed up-regulation of some LTP genes in Phaseolus vulgaris roots inoculated with rhizobia during nodulation [45]. These reports demonstrate the importance of LTPs for both pathogenic and growth-promoting effects of microorganisms, and the mechanisms of action of LTPs have been discussed in terms of their function as antimicrobial agents or their involvement in several important physiological processes in plants, including plant defense against biotic and abiotic stresses and cell signaling [46]. However, little attention was paid to the LTP involvement in suberin deposition and formation of the apoplast barriers in plants treated with bacteria. Formation of the apoplast barrier was considered as a mechanism restricting pathogens to the infection site and thus conferring pathogen resistance in plants [7]. However broader aspects of importance of the apoplast barriers in bacteria-treated plants have not been sufficiently addressed. Plant-growth-promoting bacteria have been shown to enhance deposition of lignin and suberin in salt-stressed wheat plants [12]. However, the association of bacteria-induced formation of the apoplast barriers with the bacterial effects on LTPs has been studied only in the present experiments. These experiments demonstrated that a bacteria-induced increase in deposition of suberin in the endodermis was accompanied with a corresponding increase in expression of the LTP genes and abundance of LTPs in roots.
Although enhanced formation of the apoplast barriers protects plants from unrestricted penetration of toxic ions, this effect by itself is unlikely to promote plant growth under normal conditions, since a decline in the apoplast water transport leads to stomatal closure and disturbance of the gas exchange. It was suggested [18] that a decrease in water flow through the apoplast pathway may be compensated by an enhancement of the water transport across cellular membranes through aquaporins (AQPs). The results of the present experiments with an AQP inhibitor (Fenton’s reagent) confirm this statement. We found a greater reduction in hydraulic conductance by the AQP inhibitor in inoculated plants, indicating a bacteria-induced increase in the contribution of water channels to water transport compared to control (non-inoculated) plants.
A decrease in the average water transport rate induced by an AQP inhibitor was previously demonstrated [20]. However, an association between AQP activity and formation of the apoplastic barriers has been demonstrated by us for the first time.
Previous experiments suggested that either enhanced formation of the apoplast barriers or increased AQP levels can be induced by accumulation of the ABA. This hormone influenced suberin deposition in pea [21]. ABA-induced suberin biosynthesis appeared to be a rapid although transient response in Arabidopsis plants [47]. ABA has been considered to play a regulatory role in potato tuber suberization [48]. This hormone was also able to influence AQP levels in barley [24]. Increased concentration of ABA up-regulated the expression of certain aquaporins to enhance drought tolerance through increased water transport in transgenic tobacco [49]. Salinity [21] and inoculation with P. mandelii IB-Ki14 in the present experiments increased the abundance of LTPs in pea roots accompanied with an enhanced deposition of suberin. However, although the effect of both salinity and bacterial treatment was similar in terms of their effects on LTPs and suberin levels, their mechanisms are likely to differ. Thus, the effects of salinity obviously depended on the ABA accumulation found in salt-stressed plants, while bacteria inoculation did not influence ABA content in the pea roots; therefore, bacterial effects were ABA-independent. In addition, the difference in the effect of salinity and inoculation was the absence of an effect of salinity on the expression of the LTP genes, while P. mandelii IB-Ki14 increased the expression of these genes. Therefore, the effects of salinity on the LTP abundance are likely to be realized at the post-transcriptional level, while the effects caused by bacteria depend on gene transcriptions.

5. Conclusions

It is known that the plant-growth-promoting (PGP) bacteria stimulate plant growth and development in both favorable and stressful conditions. Present research and our recent publications [12] show that one of the mechanisms of action of the PGP bacteria is an accelerated formation of the apoplastic barriers. However, the role of LTPs in bacteria-induced effects on the apoplast barriers has not been studied, although it was previously shown that LTPs participate in suberin deposition in the Casparian bands. Here, we studied the effects of one of the PGP bacteria, Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14, using pea Pisum sativum as the model plant. We investigated suberin deposition, abundance of LTPs, hydraulic conductance and activity of aquaporins in the roots of inoculated and non-inoculated pea plants. Up-regulation of pea LTP-coding genes, accumulation of LTP proteins in cell walls of the phloem as well as increased suberin deposition in the Casparian bands were detected in the roots of bacteria-treated pea plants. A greater decrease in hydraulic conductance was observed in inoculated plants after treatment by an AQP inhibitor (Fenton reagent), suggesting higher activity of AQPs in the treated plants. Thus, we have shown that P. mandelii IB-Ki14 stimulates deposition of suberin, in the biosynthesis of which LTPs are involved, and increases aquaporin activity to compensate for a possible decrease in hydraulic conductivity due to formation of the apoplast barriers in pea roots.
The obtained results deepen our understanding of the mechanisms that control the formation of apoplastic barriers and the activity of aquaporins, which are important in controlling water uptake and plant resistance to water deficit and salt stress. We demonstrated (i) the ability of bacteria to influence the formation of apoplastic barriers through LTP abundance and the influence of LTP on suberin deposition, as well as (ii) the ability of bacteria to increase AQP activity, thereby maintaining hydraulic conductivity despite an increase in apoplast barriers. Our results show that selection of bacterial strains with the aim of improving crop productivity and drought resistance should take into account the ability of the bacteria to influence these processes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.K. and T.O.; methodology, G.S., G.A., T.N., I.G. and E.F.; software, I.G.; formal analysis, O.S.; investigation, T.A., E.M., G.S., G.A., T.N., I.G., R.I. and O.S.; data curation, T.A. and E.M.; writing—original draft preparation, G.K.; visualization, T.A. and G.S.; project administration, G.K.; funding acquisition, G.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Scientific Foundation (grant number 21-14-00070).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study did not require ethical approval.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This study was carried out using the equipment of the Regional Centre for shared Use «Agidel».

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kudoyarova, G.; Arkhipova, T.; Korshunova, T.; Bakaeva, M.; Loginov, O.; Dodd, I.C. Phytohormone mediation of interactions between plants and non-symbiotic growth promoting bacteria under edaphic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ruzzi, M.; Aroca, R. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria act as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 196, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Backer, R.; Rokem, J.S.; Ilangumaran, G.; Lamont, J.; Praslickova, D.; Ricci, E.; Subramanian, S.; Smith, D.L. Plant growth- promoting rhizobacteria: Context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Petrillo, C.; Vitale, E.; Ambrosino, P.; Arena, C.; Isticato, R. Plant growth-promoting bacterial consortia as a strategy to alleviate drought stress in Spinacia oleracea. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Boursiac, Y.; Protto, V.; Rishmawi, L.; Maurel, C. Experimental and conceptual approaches to root water transport. Plant Soil 2022, 478, 349–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cui, B.; Liu, R.; Flowers, T.J.; Song, J. Casparian bands and suberin lamellae: Key targets for breeding salt tolerant crops? Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 191, 104600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lee, M.-H.; Jeon, H.S.; Kim, S.H.; Chung, J.H.; Roppolo, D.; Lee, H.-J.; Cho, H.J.; Tobimatsu, Y.; Ralph, J.; Park, O.K. Lignin based barrier restricts pathogens to the infection site and confers resistance in plants. EMBO J. 2019, 38, e101948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Akhiyarova, G.R.; Finkina, E.I.; Ovchinnikova, T.N.; Veselov, D.S.; Kudoyarova, G.R. Role of pea LTPs and abscisic acid in salt-stressed roots. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Edqvist, J.; Blomqvist, K.; Nieuwland, J.; Salminen, T.A. Plant lipid transfer proteins: Are we finally closing in on the roles of these enigmatic proteins? J. Lipid Res. 2018, 59, 1374–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Finkina, E.I.; Melnikova, D.N.; Bogdanov, I.V.; Ovchinnikova, T.V. Lipid transfer proteins as components of the plant innate immune system: Structure, functions, and applications. Acta Nat. 2016, 8, 47–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, H.; Ma, K.; Ji, G.; Pan, L.; Zhou, Q. Lipid transfer proteins involved in plant–pathogen interactions and their molecular mechanisms. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2022, 23, 1815–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Martynenko, E.; Arkhipova, T.; Safronova, V.; Seldimirova, O.; Galin, I.; Akhtyamova, Z.; Veselov, D.; Ivanov, R.; Kudoyarova, G. Effects of phytohormone-producing rhizobacteria on casparian band formation, ion homeostasis and salt tolerance of durum wheat. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, P.; Wang, C.M.; Gao, L.; Cui, Y.-N.; Yang, H.-L.; De Silva, N.D.G.; Ma, Q.; Bao, A.-K.; Flowers, T.J.; Rowland, O.; et al. Aliphatic suberin confers salt tolerance to Arabidopsis by limiting Na+ influx, K+ efflux and water backflow. Plant Soil 2020, 448, 603–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, L.; Pan, S.; Melzer, R.; Fricke, W. Apoplastic barriers, aquaporin gene expression and root and cell hydraulic conductivity in phosphate-limited sheepgrass plants. Physiol Plant. 2020, 168, 118–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Flexas, J.; Carriquí, M.; Nadal, M. Gas exchange and hydraulics during drought in crops: Who drives whom? J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 3791–3795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lawson, T.; Vialet-Chabrand, S. Speedy stomata, photosynthesis and plant water use efficiency. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Moshelion, M.; Halperin, O.; Wallach, R.; Oren, R.; Way, D.A. Role of aquaporins in determining transpiration and photosynthesis in water-stressed plants: Crop water-use efficiency, growth and yield. Plant Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 1785–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Aroca, R.; Porcel, R.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. Regulation of root water uptake under abiotic stress conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Arkhipova, T.; Sharipova, G.; Akhiyarova, G.; Kuzmina, L.; Galin, I.; Martynenko, E.; Seldimirova, O.; Nuzhnaya, T.; Feoktistova, A.; Timergalin, M.; et al. The effects of rhizosphere inoculation with Pseudomonas mandelii on formation of apoplast barriers, HvPIP2 aquaporin sand hydraulic conductance of barley. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhao, M.; Tan, H.-T.; Scharwies, J.; Levin, K.; Evans, J.R.; Tyerman, S.D. Association between water and carbon dioxide transport in leaf plasma membranes: Assessing the role of aquaporins. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 789–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Akhiyarova, G.R.; Ivanov, R.S.; Ivanov, I.I.; Finkina, E.I.; Melnikova, D.N.; Bogdanov, I.V.; Nuzhnaya, T.V.; Ovchinnikova, T.V.; Veselov, D.S.; Kudoyarova, G.R. Effects of salinity and abscisic acid on lipid transfer protein accumulation, suberin deposition and hydraulic conductance in pea roots. Membranes 2021, 11, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shiono, K.; Yoshikawa, M.; Kreszies, T.; Yamada, S.; Hojo, Y.; Matsuura, T.; Mori, I.C.; Schreiber, L.; Yoshioka, T. Abscisic acid is required for exodermal suberization to form a barrier to radial oxygen loss in the adventitious roots of rice (Oryza sativa). New Phytol. 2022, 233, 655–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Olaetxea, M.; Mora, V.; Bacaico, E.; Garnic, M.; Fuentes, M.; Casanova, E.; Zamarreco, A.M.; Iriarte, J.C.; Etayo, D.; Ederra, I.; et al. Abscisic acid regulation of root hydraulic conductivity and aquaporin gene expression is crucial to the plant shoot growth enhancement caused by rhizosphere humic acids. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 2587–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sharipova, G.; Veselov, D.; Kudoyarova, G.; Fricke, W.; Dodd, I.; Katsuhara, M.; Furuichi, T.; Ivanov, I.; Veselov, S. Exogenous application of abscisic acid (ABA) increases root and cell hydraulic conductivity and abundance of some aquaporin isoforms in the ABA deficient barley mutant Az34. Ann. Bot. 2016, 118, 777–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bogdanov, I.V.; Finkina, E.I.; Balandin, S.V.; Melnikova, D.N.; Stukacheva, E.A.; Ovchinnikova, T.V. Structural and functional characterization of recombinant isoforms of the lentil lipid transfer protein. Acta Nat. 2015, 7, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bogdanov, I.V.; Shenkarev, Z.O.; Finkina, E.I.; Melnikova, D.N.; Rumynskiy, E.I.; Arseniev, A.S.; Ovchinnikova, T.V. A novel lipid transfer protein from the pea Pisum sativum: Isolation, recombinant expression, solution structure, antifungal activity, lipid binding, and allergenic properties. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Efetova, M.; Zeier, J.; Riederer, M.; Lee, C.W.; Stingl, N.; Mueller, M.; Hartung, W.; Hedrich, R.; Deeken, R. A central role of abscisic acid in drought stress protection of Agrobacterium-induced tumors on Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 853–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Henzler, T.Y.; Steudle, Q.E. Oxidative gating of water channels (aquaporins) in Chara by hydroxyl radicals. Plant Cell Environ. 2004, 27, 1184–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bunce, J.A.; Ziska, L.H. Decreased hydraulic conductance in plants at elevated carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Environ. 1998, 21, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gonzalez-Klein, Z.; Cuevas-Zuviria, B.; Wangorsch, A.; Hernandez-Ramirez, G.; Pazos-Castro, D.; Oeo-Santos, C.; Romero-Sahagun, A.; Pacios, L.F.; Tome-Amat, J.; Scheurer, S.; et al. The key to the allergenicity of lipid transfer protein (LTP) ligands: A structural characterization. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2021, 1866, 158928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Scheurer, S.; Van Ree, R.; Vieths, S. The role of lipid transfer proteins as food and pollen allergens outside the mediterranean area. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2021, 21, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Missaoui, K.; Gonzalez-Klein, Z.; Pazos-Castro, D.; Hernandez-Ramirez, G.; Garrido-Arandia, M.; Brini, F.; Perales, A.D.; Tome-Amat, J. Plant non-specific lipid transfer proteins. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 171, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Megeressa, M.; Siraj, B.; Zarina, S.; Ahmed, A. Structural characterization and in vitro lipid binding studies of non-specific lipid transfer protein 1 (nsLTP1) from fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) seeds. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Peretti, D.; Kim, S.H.; Tufi, R.; Lev, S. Lipid transfer proteins and membrane contact sites in human cancer. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 7, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Deeken, R.; Saupe, S.; Klinkenberg, J.; Riedel, M.; Leide, J.; Hedrich, R.; Mueller, T.D. The nonspecific lipid transfer protein atltpi-4 is involved in suberin formation of Arabidopsis thaliana crown galls. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 1911–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Samuel, D.; Liu, Y.J.; Cheng, C.S.; Lyu, P.C. Solution structure of plant nonspecific lipid transfer protein-2 from rice (Oryza sativa). J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 35267–35273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Benning, U.F.; Tamot, B.; Guelette, B.S.; Hoffmann-Benning, S. New aspects of phloem-mediated long-distance lipid signaling inplants. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kaluarachchi, M.; Boulangé, C.L.; Karaman, I.; Lindon, J.C.; Ebbels, T.M.D.; Elliott, P.; Tracy, R.P.; Olson, N.C. A comparison of human serum and plasma metabolites using untargeted 1H NMR spectroscopy and UPLC-MS. Metabolomics 2018, 14, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Barbaglia, A.M.; Tamot, B.; Greve, V.; Hoffmann-Benning, S. Phloem proteomics reveals new lipid-binding proteins with a putative role in lipid-mediated signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guelette, B.S.; Benning, U.F.; Hoffmann-Benning, S. Identification of lipids and lipid-binding proteins in phloem exudates from Arabidopsis Thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3603–3616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ogden, A.J.; Bhatt, J.J.; Brewer, H.M.; Kintigh, J.; Kariuki, S.M.; Rudrabhatla, S.; Adkins, J.N.; Curtis, W.R. Phloem exudate protein profiles during drought and recovery reveal abiotic stress responses in tomato vasculature. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gao, S.; Guo, W.; Feng, W.; Liu, L.; Song, X.; Chen, J.; Hou, W.; Zhu, H.; Tang, S.; Hu, J. LTP3 contributes to disease susceptibility in Arabidopsis by enhancing abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016, 17, 412–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xu, Y.; Zheng, X.; Song, Y.; Zhu, L.; Yu, Z.; Gan, L.; Zhou, S.; Liu, H.; Wen, F.; Zhu, C. NtLTP4, a lipid transfer protein that enhances salt and drought stresses tolerance in Nicotiana tabacum. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lee, S.B.; Go, Y.S.; Bae, H.J.; Park, J.H.; Cho, S.H.; Cho, H.J.; Lee, D.S.; Park, O.; Hwang, K.I.; Suh, M. Disruption of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored lipid transfer protein gene altered cuticular lipid composition, increased plastoglobules, and enhanced susceptibility to infection by the fungal pathogen Alternaria brassicicola. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 42–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fonseca-García, C.; Solis-Miranda, J.; Pacheco, R.; Quinto, C. Non-specific lipid transfer proteins in legumes and their participation during root-nodule symbiosis. Front. Agron. 2021, 3, 660100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Amador, V.C.; Santos-Silva, C.A.d.; Vilela, L.M.B.; Oliveira-Lima, M.; de Santana Rêgo, M.; Roldan-Filho, R.S.; Oliveira-Silva, R.L.d.; Lemos, A.B.; de Oliveira, W.D.; Ferreira-Neto, J.R.C. Lipid transfer proteins (LTPs)—Structure, diversity and roles beyond antimicrobial activity. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, C.; Wang, H.; Li, P.; Li, H.; Xu, C.; Cohen, H.; Aharoni, A.; Wu, S. Developmental programs interact with abscisic acid to coordinate root suberization in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2020, 104, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Woolfson, K.N.; Esfandiari, M.; Bernards, M.A. Suberin biosynthesis, assembly and regulation. Plants 2022, 11, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sorrentino, G.; Haworth, M.; Wahbi, S.; Mahmood, T.; Zuomin, S.; Centritto, M. Abscisic acid induces rapid reductions in mesophyll conductance to carbon dioxide. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0148554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Membranes 13 00208 g001 550
Figure 1. Relative abundance of transcripts of Ps-LTP genes (means ± s.e.) in roots of control pea plants and those inoculated with Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14. The fold changes of genes normalized using the pea gene encoding tubulin (GenBank accession number X54844.1) are presented as relative units compared to control. Data sets marked with asterisks are significantly different from control (n = 3, t-test).
Figure 1. Relative abundance of transcripts of Ps-LTP genes (means ± s.e.) in roots of control pea plants and those inoculated with Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14. The fold changes of genes normalized using the pea gene encoding tubulin (GenBank accession number X54844.1) are presented as relative units compared to control. Data sets marked with asterisks are significantly different from control (n = 3, t-test).
Membranes 13 00208 g001
Membranes 13 00208 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of bacterial inoculation on LTP localization in the central cylinder of the basal part of the root. Root cross-section of uninoculated pea plants (a) and plants inoculated with Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14 (b). A higher magnification image of the phloem cells from figure b (c). The bright field image of the central cylinder of the root (d). The scale bar is 50 µm. end—endodermis; x—xylem; ph—phloem; c—cortex.
Figure 2. Effects of bacterial inoculation on LTP localization in the central cylinder of the basal part of the root. Root cross-section of uninoculated pea plants (a) and plants inoculated with Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14 (b). A higher magnification image of the phloem cells from figure b (c). The bright field image of the central cylinder of the root (d). The scale bar is 50 µm. end—endodermis; x—xylem; ph—phloem; c—cortex.
Membranes 13 00208 g002
Membranes 13 00208 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of bacterial treatment on suberin deposition. Root cross-sections from basal part of pea roots untreated (a) and treated with Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14 (b). Scale bar is 50 µm.
Figure 3. Effects of bacterial treatment on suberin deposition. Root cross-sections from basal part of pea roots untreated (a) and treated with Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14 (b). Scale bar is 50 µm.
Membranes 13 00208 g003
Membranes 13 00208 g004 550
Figure 4. Immunolocalization of the ABA on cross-sections from basal part of pea roots untreated (a) and treated with Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14 (b). The heatmap shows color-coded intensity of the fluorescence signal. The scale bar is 100 µm. x—xylem; ph—phloem; c—cortex.
Figure 4. Immunolocalization of the ABA on cross-sections from basal part of pea roots untreated (a) and treated with Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14 (b). The heatmap shows color-coded intensity of the fluorescence signal. The scale bar is 100 µm. x—xylem; ph—phloem; c—cortex.
Membranes 13 00208 g004
Membranes 13 00208 g005 550
Figure 5. The effect of AQP inhibition on the leaf water potential (means ± s.e.) of control and inoculated with Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14 pea plants (n = 6). Significantly different group-level means within each treatment are labeled with different letters (Duncan’s test, p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 5. The effect of AQP inhibition on the leaf water potential (means ± s.e.) of control and inoculated with Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14 pea plants (n = 6). Significantly different group-level means within each treatment are labeled with different letters (Duncan’s test, p ≤ 0.05).
Membranes 13 00208 g005
Membranes 13 00208 g006 550
Figure 6. The effect of AQP inhibition on hydraulic conductance of control and inoculated with Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14 pea plants (n = 6). Significantly different group-level means within each treatment are labeled with different letters (Duncan’s test, p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 6. The effect of AQP inhibition on hydraulic conductance of control and inoculated with Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14 pea plants (n = 6). Significantly different group-level means within each treatment are labeled with different letters (Duncan’s test, p ≤ 0.05).
Membranes 13 00208 g006
Table
Table 1. Sequences of primers used for qRT-PCR.
Table 1. Sequences of primers used for qRT-PCR.
GenesStrand5′ to 3′ Primer SequencesGenBank Accession Number
Ps-LTP1ForwardGCTGCCGGTTCTATTCCTAAAKJ569141
ReverseGTTGGTGGAGGTACTGATCTTG
Ps-LTP2ForwardTGGTAGTTATTGCGCCTATGGKJ569142
ReverseGGTGGAGGACTGGCATTATTAG
Ps-LTP3ForwardTGGCGATGTGCATGTTAGTKJ569143
ReverseGGGTGAAGGACTGGCATTATTA
β-tubulinForwardGCTCCCAGCAGTACAGGACTCTX54844.1
ReverseTGGCATCCCACATTTGTTGA
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martynenko, E.; Arkhipova, T.; Akhiyarova, G.; Sharipova, G.; Galin, I.; Seldimirova, O.; Ivanov, R.; Nuzhnaya, T.; Finkina, E.; Ovchinnikova, T.; et al. Effects of a Pseudomonas Strain on the Lipid Transfer Proteins, Appoplast Barriers and Activity of Aquaporins Associated with Hydraulic Conductance of Pea Plants. Membranes 2023, 13, 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13020208

AMA Style

Martynenko E, Arkhipova T, Akhiyarova G, Sharipova G, Galin I, Seldimirova O, Ivanov R, Nuzhnaya T, Finkina E, Ovchinnikova T, et al. Effects of a Pseudomonas Strain on the Lipid Transfer Proteins, Appoplast Barriers and Activity of Aquaporins Associated with Hydraulic Conductance of Pea Plants. Membranes. 2023; 13(2):208. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13020208

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martynenko, Elena, Tatiana Arkhipova, Guzel Akhiyarova, Guzel Sharipova, Ilshat Galin, Oksana Seldimirova, Ruslan Ivanov, Tatiana Nuzhnaya, Ekaterina Finkina, Tatiana Ovchinnikova, and et al. 2023. "Effects of a Pseudomonas Strain on the Lipid Transfer Proteins, Appoplast Barriers and Activity of Aquaporins Associated with Hydraulic Conductance of Pea Plants" Membranes 13, no. 2: 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13020208

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop