Next Article in Journal
Preparation and Characterization of Electrospun Poly(lactic acid)/Poly(ethylene glycol)–b–poly(propylene glycol)–b–poly(ethylene glycol)/Silicon Dioxide Nanofibrous Adsorbents for Selective Copper (II) Ions Removal from Wastewater
Next Article in Special Issue
X-ray-Fluorescence-Based Screening Method for Uranium in Contaminated Brackish Water Using Graphene Oxide Nanosheets
Previous Article in Journal
Stability of Ion Exchange Membranes in Electrodialysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel Orientation-Sensitive Spin Probes for Graphene Oxide Membranes Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Sorption of Polar Sorbents into GO Powders and Membranes

by A. V. Kaplin 1,2, A. T. Rebrikova 1, E. A. Eremina 1, N. A. Chumakova 1,2, N. V. Avramenko 1 and M. V. Korobov 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Submission received: 8 December 2022 / Revised: 26 December 2022 / Accepted: 29 December 2022 / Published: 1 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Graphene Oxide Membranes—Synthesis, Properties, and Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1. The manuscript studies the polar substance sorption difference between HGO and BGO, but the structural difference causing the difference is not clear.  The potential influence of interplanar distance and interaction between the functional group is mentioned, but no conclusion can be drawn based on the discussion.

2. The sorption is meaningful for the filtration and separation application of the GO membrane, but what application authors are aiming for is not clear. For example, does the zero sorption of acetonitrile in BGO lead to a super high stability in the acetonitrile environment of BGO or high sorption of water lead to equal dehumidification application. Whether the specific application author is working on preferring a higher sorption rate, or a selective sorption over different polar solvent is not clear.

3. Research identified the sorption rate difference between GO membrane and powder, but structural reasons cause the difference is not well stated, not to mention the meaning of study the difference. 

4. In the first paragraph, it is important to cite the HGO and BGO you are referring to. Even though the hummus method is widely used in GO preparation, different modification to the hummus method leads to different interplanar distance of as-prepared GO. 

5. It is previous and next, before and after, pre and post.  "Previous and after" in Figure 5 caption is not proper.

Author Response

Our point-by-response to the Reviewer-1 comments are given in the attached file  

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript needs modifications. Please see attached file for my comments.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Our point-by-point response to Reviewer's 2 comments are given in the attached file. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Minor changes suggested. Please see attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Author's reply is attached

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop