Next Article in Journal
A Critical Review on the Use of Ionic Liquids in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Artificial Kidney Engineering: The Development of Dialysis Membranes for Blood Purification
Previous Article in Special Issue
Membrane Reactor for Methanol Synthesis Using Si-Rich LTA Zeolite Membrane
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Zeolite Membrane: From Microstructure to Separation Performance

1
Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation, Fukuoka R&D Center, Kurosaki-Shiroishi 1-1, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu-shi 806-0004, Japan
2
Fraunhofer Institute for Ceramic Technologies and Systems IKTS, Michael-Faraday-Str. 1, 07629 Hermsdorf, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2022, 12(2), 176; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12020176
Submission received: 30 December 2021 / Accepted: 21 January 2022 / Published: 2 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Zeolite Membrane: From Microstructure to Separation Performance)
Zeolite membrane have been investigated all over the world as an attractive tool in the development of separation processes for both liquid and gaseous components. The separation process targets dehydration, organic–organic separation, gas separation, and so on. The microstructure of the membrane plays an important role in the separation mechanism; therefore, it is very important to quantitatively understand the relationship between the microstructure and separation performance. The microstructure is determined by the distribution of zeolite crystals and grain boundaries, pore connectivity inside zeolite crystals, the mixing state of the amorphous phase, and an interface structure between the membrane and its support material, etc. This structure was characterized not only by conventional analytical methods such as X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry (EDX), Infrared Spectroscopy (IR), Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and permporometry, but also by computational molecular simulation studies. This separation technique includes pervaporation, vapor permeation and gas permeation processes. The chemical engineering analysis of the separation performance and improvements to the equipment applied to the separation processes are also important for discussing the microstructure. This Special Issue contains ten papers on experimental and computational molecular simulation studies, using various zeolites such as LTA, CHA, FAU, MFI (including silicalite-1) and ZSM-22.
Two papers explored the basic characteristics of liquid separation. Hasegawa et al. [1] reported the pervaporative dehydration performances of various organic solvents using a high-silica, CHA-type zeolite membrane at 303–373 K. The dehydration performances of the membrane were categorized to the following three types: (1) 2-propanol, acetone, tetrahydrofuran (THF) and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK); (2) ethanol and acetic acid; and (3) methanol, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and N-methyl-2-pyrolidone (NMP). The category (1) showed high permeation fluxes and separation factors because of the preferential adsorption of water due to molecular sieving. Hasegawa et al. [2] investigated the lower dehydration performances of an NaA-type zeolite membrane for high-boiling solvents such as NMP solutions, as opposed to alcohols and low-boiling solvents. This study suggested that the lower dehydration performances for the high-boiling solvents were attributed to the lower vapor pressures of water and the higher permeances of those solvents.
Four papers explored the basic characteristics of gas separation. Hasegawa et al. [3] reported the permeation properties of various gaseous components, such as H2, CO2, N2, CH4, n-C4H10, and SF6 of the polycrystalline CHA-type zeolite membrane with Si/Al = 18. The N2/SF6 and CO2/CH4 selectivities were as high as 710 and 240, respectively. However, the CO2/N2 selectivity was only 25. These results propose that the high-silica, CHA-type zeolite membrane is suitable for the separation of CO2 from CH4 by the effect of molecular sieving. Inami et al. [4] reported the use of a zeolite membrane that was selectively permeable to ammonia as a sensor in a sewer system. LTA-, MFI-, and FAU-type zeolite membranes were prepared and the permeation and separation performances were determined for the ternary mixture of NH3, H2S, and N2. The FAU-type zeolite membrane with Si/Al = 1.35 showed a high enough NH3 permeance and a NH3/N2 separation factor. Furthermore, the membrane modifications with silane-coupling agents and varying membrane compositions were carried out to reduce the H2S permeance. Hasegawa and Abe [5] reported molecular simulation studies to predict the adsorption and diffusion behaviors of CO2 and CH4 in all-silica zeolites. They investigated the novel, non-bonding interaction parameters of all-silica zeolites for the prediction of the adsorption and diffusion behaviors by focusing on the Si atom of zeolite frameworks; the adsorption isotherms of CO2 and CH4 on several zeolites could be predicted with a high accuracy. Wotzka et al. [6] presented the applicability of MFI membranes for H2O/CO2 separation by means of realistic adsorption isotherms computed by configurational-biased Monte Carlo (CBMC) simulations. High separation factors (6970) of H2O/CO2 could be achieved at 70 °C and 1.8 bar feed pressure.
Three papers focused on the contribution of pore connectivity inside zeolite crystals to permeation performance. Kummali et al. [7] reported a molecular dynamics simulation to study the behavior of two fluids: ethane and CO2 confined in ZSM-22, a zeolite with channel-like pores of diameter 0.55 nm, which are isolated from each other. By comparing the behavior of the two fluids in ZSM-22 with that reported earlier in ZSM-5, and by artificially imposing pore connectivity in ZSM-22 by inserting a two-dimensional, slab-like, inter-crystalline space of thickness 0.5 nm, they studied the effect of the dimensionality and the geometry of pore connectivity. Consequently, while the translational motion of both ethane and CO2 in ZSM-22 is suppressed as a result of connecting the pores by perpendicular, quasi-one-dimensional pores of similar dimensions, the effect of connecting the pores by inserting the inter-crystalline space is different on the translational motion of the two fluids. Sakai et al. [8] investigated micropore volumes and effective pore sizes of silicalite-1 membranes by comparing them with those of a typical silicalite-1 powder. The silicalite-1 membrane with fewer grain boundaries showed similar micropore volume and effective pores size to those of the silicalite-1 powder, and exhibited relatively high permeation properties for C6-C8 hydrocarbons. In contrast, when the silicalite-1 membrane contained many grain boundaries, a relatively small micropore volume and effective pore size were observed, suggesting that the narrowing and obstruction of the micropore would occur along grain boundaries due to the disconnection of the zeolite pore. Sakai et al. concluded that it was important to reduce grain boundaries and improve pore connectivity to develop an effective preparation method for obtaining a highly permeable membrane. Sakai et al. [9] investigated the permeation behaviors of n-hexane and 2-methylpentane through two-types of silicalite-1 membranes that had different pore connectivity. The permeation mechanisms of these hydrocarbons were able to be explained by the adsorption–diffusion model, and the fluxes through silicalite-1 membranes could be expressed by the modified Fick’s first law. The hydrocarbon fluxes through the membrane with better pore connectivity were ca. 3–20 times larger than those through the membrane with poor pore connectivity. They concluded that the pore connectivity in the silicalite-1 membrane significantly influences molecular diffusivities.
One paper explored the topic of the membrane reactor. Seshimo et al. [10] demonstrated the effect of a membrane reactor on methanol synthesis to improve one-pass CO2 conversion. They applied an Si-rich LTA membrane for dehydration from a methanol synthesis reaction field, and reported that the CO2 conversion of the membrane reactor was higher than that of the conventional packed-bed reactor under the all experimental conditions. This paper is a fascinating contribution as it demonstrates a new application of the LTA membrane.
This Special Issue aims to cover the recent developments and advances in all fundamental, application and industrial aspects that concern the microstructure and the separation performance of zeolite membranes. All of the articles published in this Special Issue were reviewed by recognized experts in the relevant fields of science.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

As Guest Editor, we would like to acknowledge all of the authors for their valuable contributions. We would also like to thank the reviewers for their comments and suggestions, which have greatly improved the quality of the papers. Lastly, we acknowledge Josiah Gong as the Assistant Editor who made a great effort to plan this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hasegawa, Y.; Abe, C.; Ikeda, A. Pervaporative Dehydration of Organic Solvents Using High-Silica CHA-Type Zeolite Membrane. Membranes 2021, 11, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hasegawa, Y.; Matsuura, W.; Abe, C.; Ikeda, A. Influence of Organic Solvent Species on Dehydration Behaviors of NaA-Type Zeolite Membrane. Membranes 2021, 11, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hasegawa, Y.; Abe, C.; Natsui, M.; Ikeda, A. Gas Permeation Properties of High-Silica CHA-Type Zeolite Membrane. Membranes 2021, 11, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Inami, H.; Abe, C.; Hasegawa, Y. Development of Ammonia Selectively Permeable Zeolite Membrane for Sensor in Sewer System. Membranes 2021, 11, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hasegawa, Y.; Abe, C. Prediction of Adsorption and Diffusion Behaviors of CO2 and CH4 in All-Silica Zeolites Using Molecular Simulation. Membranes 2021, 11, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wotzka, A.; Jorabchi, M.N.; Wohlrab, S. Separation of H2O/CO2 Mixtures by MFI Membranes: Experiment and Monte Carlo Study. Membranes 2021, 11, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kummali, M.M.; Cole, D.; Gautam, S. Effect of Pore Connectivity on the Behavior of Fluids Confined in Sub-Nanometer Pores: Ethane and CO2 Confined in ZSM-22. Membranes 2021, 11, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sakai, M.; Sasaki, Y.; Kaneko, T.; Matsukata, M. Contribution of Pore-Connectivity to Permeation Performance of Silicalite-1 Membrane; Part I, Pore Volume and Effective Pore Size. Membranes 2021, 11, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sakai, M.; Sasaki, Y.; Kaneko, T.; Matsukata, M. Contribution of Pore-Connectivity to Permeation Performance of Silicalite-1 Membrane; Part II, Diffusivity of C6 Hydrocarbon in Micropore. Membranes 2021, 11, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Seshimo, M.; Liu, B.; Lee, H.R.; Yogo, K.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Shigaki, N.; Mogi, Y.; Kita, H.; Nakao, S. Membrane Reactor for Methanol Synthesis Using Si-Rich LTA Zeolite Membrane. Membranes 2021, 11, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kyotani, T.; Richter, H. Zeolite Membrane: From Microstructure to Separation Performance. Membranes 2022, 12, 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12020176

AMA Style

Kyotani T, Richter H. Zeolite Membrane: From Microstructure to Separation Performance. Membranes. 2022; 12(2):176. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12020176

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kyotani, Tomohiro, and Hannes Richter. 2022. "Zeolite Membrane: From Microstructure to Separation Performance" Membranes 12, no. 2: 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12020176

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop