Next Article in Journal
Studies on Anion Exchange Membrane and Interface Properties by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy: The Role of pH
Next Article in Special Issue
Orodispersible Membranes from a Modified Coaxial Electrospinning for Fast Dissolution of Diclofenac Sodium
Previous Article in Journal
A Study to Enhance the Nitrate-Nitrogen Removal Rate without Dismantling the NF Module by Building a PFSA Ionomer-Coated NF Module
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Electrospun Medicated Nanofibers for Wound Healing: Review

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
2
Shanghai Engineering Technology Research Center for High-Performance Medical Device Materials, Shanghai 200093, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2021, 11(10), 770; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11100770
Submission received: 14 September 2021 / Revised: 2 October 2021 / Accepted: 6 October 2021 / Published: 9 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electrospun Nanofiber Membranes: From Synthesis to Applications)

Abstract

:
With the increasing demand for wound care and treatment worldwide, traditional dressings have been unable to meet the needs of the existing market due to their limited antibacterial properties and other defects. Electrospinning technology has attracted more and more researchers’ attention as a simple and versatile manufacturing method. The electrospun nanofiber membrane has a unique structure and biological function similar to the extracellular matrix (ECM), and is considered an advanced wound dressing. They have significant potential in encapsulating and delivering active substances that promote wound healing. This article first discusses the common types of wound dressing, and then summarizes the development of electrospun fiber preparation technology. Finally, the polymers and common biologically active substances used in electrospinning wound dressings are summarized, and portable electrospinning equipment is also discussed. Additionally, future research needs are put forward.

1. Introduction

Skin is the largest important organ of the human body and the first barrier against external pathogens [1]. However, external mechanical forces, surgical operations, burns, chemical injuries, and ulcers from certain chronic diseases can cause varying degrees of damage to the skin [2]. Wound healing is a complicated and dynamic process of tissue regeneration, mainly composed of four stages: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling [3]. Although the skin can undergo a certain degree of spontaneous repair, bacterial infection has always been the main reason hindering wound healing. For an infected wound, it will not only disrupt the normal healing process, but also cause the wound tissue to be deformed, causing great pain to the patient [4].
Wound dressings play an essential role in wound healing management. They protect the wound from external risk factors, and speed up the healing process [5]. On the basis of the mechanism of wound healing, an ideal wound dressing ought to have the accompanying attributes: (1) absorb excess exudate; (2) protect the wound from microbial infection; (3) maintain a moist healing environment at the wound site; (4) facilitate gas exchange; (5) non-toxic, biocompatible, and degradable; (6) does not adhere to the wound, easy to replace and remove; (7) promote angiogenesis and tissue regeneration [6,7,8]. Different wound needs should be integrated when choosing wound dressings. So far, the common dressings on the market mainly include film [9], foam [10], sponge [11], hydrogel [12,13], and nanofiber membrane [14,15]. Among these materials, the unique structure of the small pore size and high porosity of the nanofiber membrane can protect the wound from pathogen infection and ensure the free transportation of gas and liquid molecules. At the same time, a large amount of research has been carried out, combining the adjustable characteristics of physical and mechanical properties to make it stand out among biomaterials [16,17].
So far, methods such as drawing [18], self-assembly [19], phase separation [20] and template synthesis [21] have been used to prepare nanofibers. However, they have disadvantages such as high cost, time-consuming and low efficiency. Therefore, simple and practical electrospinning technology is widely used to manufacture fibers with diameters in the nanometer or micrometer range [22]. Electrospun nanofiber membranes represent a new class of materials. Because of their high surface-to-volume ratio, high microporosity and versatility, they can be used in various biomedical applications [23], such as tissue engineering scaffolds [24,25], drug delivery [26,27,28] and wound dressings [29,30]. Nanofiber wound dressings prepared by electrospinning technology have many advantages. First, the structure and biological function are similar to the natural extracellular matrix (ECM), which provides an ideal microenvironment for cell adhesion, proliferation, migration and differentiation [31,32]. Secondly, the polymer matrix used for electrospinning can simultaneously combine the biocompatibility of natural polymers and the reliable mechanical strength of synthetic polymers [33]. Furthermore, the nanofiber membrane’s wide surface area and porous structure can be effectively loaded with various biologically active ingredients, including antibacterial drugs, inorganic nanoparticles, vitamins, growth factors and Chinese herbal extracts. The rate and time of drug release are controlled by adjusting the fiber structure and morphological size, thereby promoting effective healing of the wound site [34]. Therefore, electrospun nanofibers show great potential in the preparation of advanced bioactive wound dressings.
In recent years, on the “Web of Science” platform, the subject of “Wound dressing” and “Electrospun wound dressing” has been searched among the literature. The statistical results are shown in Figure 1. The number of relevant documents corresponding to the two topics has shown a substantial increase year by year. Among them, the literature with the theme of “Wound dressing” has maintained thousands of articles every year from 2010 to the end of 2020, indicating that wound dressing has become a hot research topic in recent years. At the same time, the number of documents retrieved with the theme of “Electrospun wound dressing” has maintained more than a hundred articles in the past five years, indicating that electrospun nanofibers are developing into a new type of wound dressing with broad application prospects. This article reviews the research progress and application prospects of electrospun medical nanofibers used in wound dressings. The new strategy of electrospinning technology for preparing nanofiber wound dressings is described in detail.

2. Wound and Wound Dressing

2.1. Wounds Classification

Wounds are defined as skin deformities or tissue discontinuities brought about by physical or thermal injury, or underlying ailments [35]. Given the nature and duration of the healing process, wounds are usually divided into acute and chronic types [36]. Acute wounds mainly include mechanical injuries, chemical injuries, surface burns and surgical wounds, etc. The healing process follows the normal wound healing cycle [37,38,39]. However, chronic wounds refer to those cannot go through an orderly healing process and have been open for more than one month. The causes of chronic wounds vary, and are mainly related to certain specific diseases (such as diabetes). They are notorious for the terrible incidence of ulcers, and they are susceptible to infection by inflammatory bacteria that affect wound repair [40,41]. Globally, chronic wounds impose a heavy burden on patients and healthcare systems [42].

2.2. Types of Wound Dressing

In 1962, Dr. Jorge Winter of the University of London put forward the “moist healing environment theory” first, and related studies confirmed that a moist environment will speed up the wound healing process [43]. In recent years, the theory of moist healing has received extensive consideration. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pointed out in an industry guide issued in August 2000 that one of the standard methods of wound treatment is to maintain a moist environment on the wound surface [44]. With the in-depth study of wound healing, the types of wound treatment and dressings are constantly improving and developing [45]. Wound dressings are classified into traditional wound dressing, modern wound dressing and bioactive wound dressing according to their functional properties and wound origin. Table 1 classifies and summarizes wound dressings based on their functions.

2.2.1. Traditional Wound Dressing

Traditional wound dressings mainly use gauze, lint and bandages as dressings, which are the most widely used wound dressings. However, it does not absorb and drain the exudate from the wound site smoothly during use, and cannot maintain a moist healing environment. The porous structure on the surface cannot prevent the invasion of external bacteria and will promote the migration of bacteria to the wound site in a humid environment. It is easy to adhere to the wound exudate during use, so it will cause secondary damage to the skin when replaced [53].

2.2.2. Modern Wound Dressing

Compared with traditional dressings, modern wound dressings have better biocompatibility, moisture retention and degradability [54]. Standard high-end modern dressings include film, foam, hydrocolloid, hydrogel and alginate dressings, etc., which provide a more effective healing effect than traditional dressings [47]. The film is a light, thin and elastic transparent polyurethane or synthetic polymer adhesive. The transparent surface can permeate not only water vapor and oxygen, but is also convenient to observe the healing of the wound [55]. Foam dressings are usually composed of a hydrophilic polymer layer and a hydrophobic polyurethane absorbent layer. The polymer layer is permeable to gas and semi-permeable to fluids. The inner layer structure is used to absorb exudate, and the outer layer is used to prevent the wound from drying out and prevent it from being invaded by bacteria [56]. Hydrocolloid dressing is a new type of wound dressing widely used in clinical practice, which is made of water or glycerin-based polymer materials. After absorbing the liquid, it will swell to form a gel, and the dressing will become soft [57]. Hydrogel dressings are cross-linked polymer networks made of carbohydrate-based materials, which can be made into various thicknesses and are widely used in drug delivery and tissue repair [58]. Alginate dressings are a dressing prepared with different types of seaweed or algae polysaccharides. It has a high fluid absorption capacity and promotes autolytic debridement to soften and eliminate necrotic tissue. It is often used for chronic wounds with high exudate fluid, deep burns and surgical wounds that require hemostasis [59].

2.2.3. Bioactive Wound Dressing

As a new type of wound dressing, bioactive wound dressings are used to expedite the healing of various types of wounds [60]. This dressing is made of various polymers, such as gelatin, silk fibroin, chitosan, alginate, etc., and is applied in the form of foam, sponge, film, hydrogel and nanofiber membrane (Figure 2) [6,61]. Biologically active substances such as antibacterial drugs, growth factors, nanoparticles and natural products are added to obtain antibacterial activity, promote fibroblast activity and endothelial cell migration [62]. In short, the development of functionalized bioactive dressings is a crucial step in developing wound dressings.

3. Electrospinning Technology

3.1. Introduction to Electrospinning Technology

Electrospinning technology, as a superfine fiber preparation technology, has experienced hundreds of years of development [63]. The electrostatic spinning device is mainly composed of four parts: a high-voltage generator, a fluid driver, a spinneret and a collection device [64]. In the electrospinning process, the initial electrospinning fluid gradually changes its morphology after the voltage is applied, until it reaches the critical voltage shape into a Taylor cone. When the liquid jet stretches over a certain distance, it enters the bending and whiplash stage. With the solvent volatilization, the jet is stretched to micrometers or even tens of nanometers, finally solidified and deposited on the collector to form nanofiber [65,66]. On the basis of this principle, the electrospinning process can be adjusted by system parameters (polymer type, molecular weight, viscosity, conductivity of the solution, surface tension), process parameters (voltage, flow rate, receiving distance) and environmental parameters (humidity, temperature) to change the morphology and size of nanofibers [67,68]. As a simple, top-down one-step preparation method, electrospinning technology produces nanofibers with small pore size, high porosity and a structure similar to ECM. Therefore, it has received extensive attention from researchers and used to prepare functionalized nanofibers for applications in biomedicine and other fields [69,70,71]. At the same time, the electrospinning technology is continuously upgraded and optimized. As shown in Figure 3, it has gradually developed into single fluid electrospinning (blend electrospinning and emulsion electrospinning), double-fluid electrospinning (coaxial electrospinning and side-by-side electrospinning) and multifluid electrospinning (triaxial electrospinning and other multifluid electrospinning).

3.2. Single Fluid Electrospinning

3.2.1. Blend Electrospinning

Blend electrospinning is the most common method for preparing blended nanofibers. A suitable solvent is usually selected in the preparation process, which can dissolve the polymer used and the drug added. If the polymer-dissolving solvent cannot dissolve the drug, it is possible to add a small amount of the drug-soluble solvent to dissolve them together [73]. If the dissolvability of the drug in the polymer solution is low, a large amount of the drug will be present on the surface of the prepared fiber. As a result, an explosive release of drugs occurs, which is also the main weakness of hybrid electrospinning [74].

3.2.2. Emulsion Electrospinning

Emulsion electrospinning is a simple and standard method for preparing nanofibers with a core–shell structure, which could effectively load drugs [75]. Different from the blend electrospinning mentioned above, the hydrophilic drugs in emulsion electrospinning are usually dissolved in the water phase and then diffused into the oil phase containing surfactants/emulsifiers. The water/oil emulsion obtained after electrospinning forms nanofibers with a core–shell structure in which the drug is included in the core [76]. Therefore, it shows superior performance in the properties of encapsulating biologically active substances, e.g., proteins and drugs [77]. Zhan et al. [78] reported that using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and polyacrylic acid (PAA) as polymers, electrospun nanofibers loaded with tangeretin (Tan) were prepared by the emulsion electrospinning method. In vitro drug release results show that PVA/PAA/Tan nanofibers have longer-lasting release characteristics and a lower initial burst release rate than pure Tan emulsion. This work provides a promising technology for the preparation of insoluble drug release and drug delivery systems.

3.3. Double-Fluid Electrospinning

3.3.1. Coaxial Electrospinning

Among the various multifluid electrospinning techniques, coaxial electrospinning is the most basic one, which is widely used to manufacture core–sheath nanofibers [79]. In the core–sheath nanofibers, if a drug-loaded hydrophilic polymer is selected as the core solution, voids will be formed in the sheath fiber after it is dissolved. At this time, the hydrophobic shell serves as an outer protective layer to prevent initial burst release. By loading different forms of sheath polymer, two different release forms can be achieved to control the release of drugs [80]. Therefore, coaxial electrospinning is considered one of the most significant breakthroughs in the field of drug-sustained release [81,82]. Yan et al. [83] successfully prepared PH-sensitive PVA/polycaprolactone (PCL) core–shell nanofibers using coaxial electrospinning technology, achieving sustained PH-responsive release of the anticancer drug doxorubicin (DOX).
With the in-depth study of electrospinning technology, researchers have discovered that the traditional coaxial electrospinning technology has the problem of poor ability to manage the morphology of the fiber. At the same time, more and more research is devoted to treating unspinnable fluids in multifluid work. If they are used as a sheath liquid and work with a spinnable core fluid, they can be converted into nanofibers [84]. In 2010, Yu et al. [85] reported the use of pure solvents (unspinnable fluid) as the sheath working fluid to conduct electrospinning experiments, which effectively prevented the clogging of the spinneret during the spinning process; high-quality nanofibers with smooth surfaces were prepared. Later, the coaxial/triaxial process using unspinnable fluid as the sheath fluid was called modified coaxial/triaxial electrospinning.

3.3.2. Side by Side Electrospinning

In 2003, Gupta and Wilkes first reported the use of side-by-side electrospinning to prepare Janus nanofibers [86]. The Janus structure is one of the most basic structures. Different from the traditional core–sheath structure, its two chambers are separated from each other and both are in contact with the surrounding environment. In side-by-side electrospinning, nanofibers with different properties can be prepared by designing the structure of the spinneret and adjusting the electrospinning parameters [87,88,89]. Zheng et al. conducted a study on the effect of the bilateral drug loading of electrospun Janus nanofibers on the two-phase controlled release of the anticancer drug tamoxifen (TAM), and described the related mechanisms. It can be found from the drug release curve that different polymer components, different two-compartment structures and shapes have a significant impact on the in vitro release characteristics of TAM. They have also been proven to be important elements in the design of functional nanomaterials [90].

3.4. Multifluid Electrospinning

3.4.1. Triaxial Electrospinning

With the rapid development of nanotechnology, researchers are not satisfied with the development and application of secondary structures. They have begun to devote themselves to the research of triaxial and even multiaxial electrospinning to meet the needs of different fields [91]. Naveen et al. [92] used poly (lactic-co-glycolic-acid) (PLGA) as the sheath fluid, gelatin as the intermediate layer, PCL as the core layer, Rhodamine B (RhB) and Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) was loaded into the outer and intermediate layer solutions, respectively, a triaxial electrospinning was performed. The prepared nanofibers show excellent mechanical properties and dual drug release capabilities.
Later, Ding et al. [93] used PH-sensitive polymer Eudragit S100 (ES100) as a matrix, loaded with a model drug aspirin, prepared core–shell nanofibers using a modified triaxial electrospinning technology. Compared with traditional single fluid electrospun nanofibers, in vitro drug release exhibits a longer-term sustained release of aspirin, avoiding cytotoxicity caused by short-term excessive drug release. Subsequently, Zhao et al. followed the technology of the research group and used the prepared nanofiber membranes loaded with functional particles for the research of removing antibiotics from water bodies [94]. Wang et al. demonstrated the construction of drug libraries into core–shell nanofibers through modified triaxial electrospinning technology. Cellulose acetate (CA) was used as the polymer, the model drug acyclovir (ACY) prolonged the sustained release time during in vitro release study. The core–shell structure and uneven drug distribution make it show an excellent structure-performance relationship [95]. Therefore, core–shell nanofibers produced through coaxial and modified triaxial electrospinning techniques deliver various strategies for constructing new functional nanomaterials.

3.4.2. Other Multifluid Electrospinning

In multifluid electrospinning, in addition to the widely used core–shell structure and Janus structure, other multifluid electrospinning has also been carried out to study nanofibers with more complex structures. Correspondingly, processes such as quad-fluid coaxial electrospinning, trifluid side-by-side electrospinning and coaxial electrospinning with a side-by-side core have emerged [96]. Zhang et al. [97] reported a nanofiber system prepared by the quadriaxial electrospinning method. Gelatin was used to construct the second outermost and innermost layer, and polycaprolactone was used to build the second innermost and outermost layer. The antibacterial drug moxifloxacin (MXF) is loaded in different layers to achieve different controlled releases. This structure shows broad application prospects in tissue engineering.

4. Electrospun Nanofibers in Wound Dressing

Nanofibers prepared by electrospinning technology show excellent properties in promoting wound healing. Their microstructure is highly fitted to the human body ECM structure, which is conducive to cell growth, proliferation and adhesion [31,98]. At the same time, the high permeability and absorption rate can absorb the exudate formed on the wound surface and maintain a moist healing environment. In addition, the large surface area benefits loading and transporting bioactive ingredients such as drugs and growth factors [34,99]. Therefore, electrospun nanofiber materials are considered to be the ideal choice for wound dressings.

4.1. Polymer in Electrospun Wound Dressing

At present, there are hundreds of polymers that can be successfully used to prepare drug carriers by electrospinning. In related research on electrospinning wound dressings, both natural and synthetic polymers have been widely used. Figure 4 simply classifies and summarizes the common polymers in electrospun wound dressings.

4.1.1. Natural Polymer

Natural polymers have non-toxic, biocompatibility and biodegradability properties, especially their own advantages such as antibacterial properties, making them popular in electrospinning wound dressings [100]. The following are several typical natural polymers that are used more frequently.
Gelatin, a natural protein biopolymer, is obtained by hydrolyzing part of collagen and is generally pale-yellow translucent particles or flakes. The products are abundant and cheap, and soluble in hot water, glycerin and acetic acid. It has good biocompatibility and biodegradability and is usually used in combination with synthetic polymer PCL to obtain better performance [101].
Chitosan (CS) is a derivative of chitin through deacetylation. It is a polysaccharide with a unique structure and superior functions [102]. It is soluble in aqueous solutions of organic acids such as formic acid and acetic acid, making them highly viscous and facilitating electrospinning [103]. Due to the amino activity on the backbone and the ductility of the hydroxyl group, it has potential applications in the fields of pharmacy, food packaging and wound treatment [104]. Figure 5A shows chitosan extracted from natural sources, developed into electrospun fiber membrane and its application in wound healing. Figure 5B shows a schematic diagram of the wound healing process of a drug-loaded chitosan dressing, which is designed as a physical barrier to protect the wound from microbial invasion and support the migration and differentiation of fibroblasts. Xia et al. [105] used a simple one-step electrospinning method to prepare transparent chitosan-coated cellulose membranes (CM-CS), and studied their cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Escherichia coli (E. coli). The wound healing effect was evaluated by constructing a wound healing model in mice.
Silk fibroin (SF) is a protein with a complex structure and has been used as a textile and sewing material for decades [106]. Many types of it can be obtained from bees, spiders, wasps, lacewings and silkworms (Figure 5C). Among them, SF extracted from silkworm cocoons is used in the field of biomedicine because of its outstanding mechanical properties, biocompatibility, biodegradability, flexibility, water vapor permeability and slight antibacterial properties. In particular, it has become an excellent candidate for wound dressing applications [107]. Hadisi et al. [108] used hyaluronic acid (HA) as the sheath spinning solution and SF/zinc oxide (ZnO) as the core to prepare nanofibers with a core–sheath structure. The antibacterial mechanism of ZnO was explored through in vitro antibacterial tests, and the healing results of burn wounds in rats indicated that the dressing has a certain burn treatment effect (Figure 5D). Other natural polymer materials commonly used for electrospinning wound dressings include alginate [109], collagen and cellulose.

4.1.2. Synthetic Polymer

There are more types of synthetic polymers applied in electrospinning than natural polymers, and related research on wound dressings is also abundant. Such polymers have excellent mechanical properties, thermal stability and spinnability, and are widely used as carrier materials for electrospinning wound dressings. The following summarizes several synthetic polymers that are more common in the research of wound dressings.
Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) is a hydrophilic polymer prepared from the monomer vinylpyrrolidone (NVP) through bulk polymerization and solution polymerization. PVP is soluble in water and most organic solvents, and has low toxicity. Due to its excellent biocompatibility, it has been widely used in biomedicine and has become one of the three new drug dressings advocated internationally [110]. Chinatangkul et al. [111] mixed shellac (SHL) with PVP, added Monolaurin (ML) and prepared nanofibers by blending electrospinning technology. It shows excellent inhibitory activity against S. aureus and Candida albicans, indicating that the electrospun nanofiber is suitable for wound treatment.
PCL is a polymer obtained by ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone, which is a material approved by the FDA. It is a white particle and exists in a semi-crystalline state with a low melting point. Because of its outstanding spinnability and mechanical strength, is being widely applied in wound dressings [112]. He et al. [113] prepared a series of nanofibers with antibacterial, anti-oxidation, tensile properties and electrical activity by electrospinning PCL and CS-grafted polyaniline (QCSP) polymer solution (Figure 6A). In the mouse full-thickness wound defect model, the wound healing process is significantly accelerated, showing broad application prospects.
PVA is a white and odorless polymer. It is soluble in water above 95 °C. In addition to being an important chemical raw material, PVA has also drawn in much consideration in the field of medicine. At present, it has a broad scope of utilizations in artificial joints and wound dressings [114]. Ali et al. [115] used a PVA solution to prepare nanofiber mats with Nigella sativa extract deposited by electrospinning. Wound healing analysis results show that the developed PVA-Nigella sativa nanofibrous mat has good wound healing properties and a short recovery time.

4.1.3. Combination of Natural and Synthetic Polymers

On the basis of the benefits of easy degradation and excellent biocompatibility of natural polymers, and the controllability and reliable mechanical strength of synthetic polymers, combining the two types of fibers is the choice of many researchers [116]. Ramalingam et al. [117] reported using PCL/gelatin as a polymer carrier to prepare a coaxial electrospun core–sheath nanofiber membrane, containing antibiotic minocycline and herbal extracts as a multifunctional scaffold for the treatment of secondary burns. The core–sheath structure maintains the sustained release of biologically active ingredients. In addition to showing strong antibacterial activity, it also promotes the proliferation and diffusion of skin cells. Improved collagen tissue can be observed through the second-degree burn model of pigskin. Figure 6B shows the excellent properties of the prepared PCL/gelatin core–sheath structure mat. Zou et al. [118] reported the preparation of PVA/CS nanofibers with carboxymethyl CS nanoparticles, which encapsulated the antimicrobial peptide OH-CATH30. Results showed that prepared nanofibers contain antibacterial properties and can promote wound healing. Khan et al. [119] successfully encapsulated oregano oil in Poly (L-lactide-co-caprolactone) (PLCL)/SF nanofiber membranes. Cytotoxicity and antibacterial tests showed high biocompatibility and antibacterial activity, respectively. At the same time, it can also improve the quality of wound healing and could be used as a potential wound dressing.

4.2. Bioactive Ingredients in Electrospun Wound Dressing

Another important advantage of electrospinning to prepare nanofiber wound dressings is that it can load a variety of biologically active ingredients to prepare functionalized products. At present, to improve the antibacterial properties of dressings, commonly used active substances include antibiotic drugs (ciprofloxacin (CIP), curcumin, metronidazole, tetracycline, gentamicin and diclofenac), inorganic nanoparticles (nanosilver particles (AgNP), ZnO, titanium dioxide (TiO2), cerium oxide (CeO2)), natural substances (honey, essential oils, chitosan) and growth factors [120,121,122,123].
Augustine et al. [124] reported the development of a new type of nCeO2, which contains electrospun poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxy valerate) (PHBV) membrane. In vivo wound healing studies in diabetic rats confirmed that PHBV membranes mixed with 1% nCeO2 showed perfect cell compatibility, and could be used as promising biomaterials to treat diabetic wound healing (Figure 7A). Yang et al. [125] used the side-by-side electrospinning process to prepare Janus nanofibers containing CIP and AgNP as the polymer matrix, and studied their effects on wound healing. The antibacterial effect in the process provides a new idea for the preparation of new antibacterial wound dressings. Jafari et al. [126] prepared a bilayer nanofiber scaffold based on PCL and gelatin. The top layer contains amoxicillin, and the bottom layer contains n-ZnO to accelerate wound healing. In vitro release test showed the sustained release of amoxicillin. Analysis of wound healing in rats showed that the scaffold improved the shrinkage rate of the wound, enhanced the deposition of collagen and reduced the formation of scars. All results and findings indicate that prefabricated stents can be a promising alternative method for treating skin injuries. Figure 7B shows the characterization analysis of the prepared bilayer nanofiber scaffold. Table 2 summarizes the common polymers and active substances in electrospinning wound dressings.

4.3. In Situ Electrospinning in Wound Dressing

Compared with ordinary electrospinning, in situ electrospinning is more convenient and comfortable to use, and can better cover wounds. Simultaneously, dressings can be customized according to patient needs [147]. Qin et al. [148] used a portable electrospinning device to prepare electrospun Zein/Clove essential oil nanofiber. In vitro experiments have observed good biocompatibility and antibacterial effects. In the mouse wound model, it can be observed that the prepared Zein/CEO nanofiber membrane promotes wound healing. Figure 8A shows the diagram of its preparation. Yue et al. [149] used ethanol-soluble polyurethane (EPU) and Fluorinated polyurethane (FPU) as polymer carriers and used a customized electrospinning device to prepare thymol-loaded nanofiber membranes (Figure 8B(a)). The results indicate that the membrane has good breathable, waterproof performance and excellent antibacterial activity (Figure 8B(b)), providing a promising strategy for developing portable electrospinning devices.

4.4. Application of Electrospinning Technology in Other Fields

In recent years, the advantages of electrospinning have attracted more and more attention. With the continuous research of related scholars, the application of electrospinning nanofibers has become more and more extensive. In addition to playing a role in the field of biomedicine (drug delivery [150,151,152], tissue engineering [153] and wound dressings), it also plays a pivotal position in environmental protection (air filtration, water treatment), energy and chemical industries (light-emitting device, solar cell and supercapacitor) and other fields [154,155]. Fiber materials with unique structures and characteristics arranged by electrospinning have been generally utilized in different fields (Figure 9). Combining the structural advantages of the materials with the properties of the materials will be the focus of future research.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Electrospinning technology has attracted more and more attention in recent years as a highly versatile technology for preparing micro-nano-level fibers with diameters. Electrospinning fiber material has an extremely high specific surface area, high porosity, adjustable fiber morphology and surface function. These characteristics make the electrospun fiber material possess a series of ideal properties, which can meet the application requirements of various fields such as biomedicine and tissue engineering. With the development of coaxial electrospinning, side-by-side electrospinning and triaxial electrospinning, high-quality nanofibers with core–sheath structure, Janus structure and triaxial structure have been prepared. In the future, more advanced and complex multi-fluid electrospinning technology can be utilized to produce nanofibers with new structures. At the same time, electrospun nanofibers can carry a variety of active substances and have the ability to continuously release drugs and nanoparticles, which is highly beneficial for improving the overall performance of the wound.
The development of wound dressings still faces some challenges that need to be considered, and many researchers have also given different views. Different wound exudates are extremely different, which makes it difficult to find the ideal dressing for all wound types [49,121]. Therefore, the bioactive nanofiber dressing produced by electrospinning technology takes into account the characteristics of the wound healing process, stimulates cell migration, and controls inflammation. At the same time, it relieves pain by releasing related drugs, and can be effectively used for acute or chronic wound treatment. However, this advanced dressing needs to be evaluated in a large number of clinical trials to ensure the final clinical application. We believe that our review provides insights and references for the further development of electrospun nanofibers in clinical applications. In the future, it is necessary to improve the performance of electrospun fibers further, realize the standardization of drug-loaded fiber preparation methods, and prepare new functional wound dressings to provide more technical support for biomedical applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, X.L.; validation, formal analysis; writing—original draft preparation, H.X.; writing—review and editing, M.Z.; supervision, project administration, D.-G.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by joint project of USST-CIHE (No. 20181116) and Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No. 20ZR1439000).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this manuscript are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nosrati, H.; Aramideh Khouy, R.; Nosrati, A.; Khodaei, M.; Banitalebi-Dehkordi, M.; Ashrafi-Dehkordi, K.; Sanami, S.; Alizadeh, Z. Nanocomposite scaffolds for accelerating chronic wound healing by enhancing angiogenesis. J. Nanobiotechnology 2021, 19, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fatehi, P.; Abbasi, M. Medicinal plants used in wound dressings made of electrospun nanofibers. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2020, 14, 1527–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. El Ayadi, A.; Jay, J.W.; Prasai, A. Current approaches targeting the wound healing phases to attenuate fibrosis and scarring. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Chen, M.; Tian, J.; Liu, Y.; Cao, H.; Li, R.; Wang, J.; Wu, J.; Zhang, Q. Dynamic covalent constructed self-healing hydrogel for sequential delivery of antibacterial agent and growth factor in wound healing. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 373, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, K.; Wang, F.; Liu, S.; Wu, X.; Xu, L.; Zhang, D. In situ reduction of silver nanoparticles by sodium alginate to obtain silver-loaded composite wound dressing with enhanced mechanical and antimicrobial property. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 148, 501–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fahimirad, S.; Ajalloueian, F. Naturally-derived electrospun wound dressings for target delivery of bioactive agents. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 566, 307–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kanikireddy, V.; Varaprasad, K.; Jayaramudu, T.; Karthikeyan, C.; Sadiku, R. Carboxymethyl cellulose-based materials for infection control and wound healing: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 963–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Das, A.; Uppaluri, R.; Das, C. Feasibility of poly-vinyl alcohol/starch/glycerol/citric acid composite films for wound dressing applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 131, 998–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Weng, W.; Chi, J.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Shi, K.; Zhao, Y. Multifunctional composite inverse opal film with multiactives for wound healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 4567–4573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bužarovska, A.; Dinescu, S.; Lazar, A.D.; Serban, M.; Pircalabioru, G.G.; Costache, M.; Gualandi, C.; Avérous, L. Nanocomposite foams based on flexible biobased thermoplastic polyurethane and ZnO nanoparticles as potential wound dressing materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 104, 109893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cui, H.; Liu, M.; Yu, W.; Cao, Y.; Zhou, H.; Yin, J.; Liu, H.; Que, S.; Wang, J.; Huang, C.; et al. Copper peroxide-loaded gelatin sponges for wound dressings with antimicrobial and accelerating healing properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 26800–26807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhao, X.; Pei, D.; Yang, Y.; Xu, K.; Yu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; He, G.; Zhang, Y.; Li, A.; et al. Green tea derivative driven smart hydrogels with desired functions for chronic diabetic wound treatment. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2009442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pan, X.; Kong, D.; Wang, W.; Liu, W.; Ou-Yang, W.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Q.; Huang, P.; Zhang, C.; Li, Y. Synthetic polymeric antibacterial hydrogel for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus-infected wound healing: Nanoantimicrobial self-assembly, drug- and cytokine-free strategy. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 12905–12917. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, L.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, H.; Sun, X.; Liu, D.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, L.; Santos, H.A.; Cui, W. Programmable immune activating electrospun fibers for skin regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 2021, 6, 3218–3230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guo, X.; Liu, Y.; Bera, H.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Y.; Cun, D.; Foderà, V.; Yang, M. α-Lactalbumin-based nanofiber dressings improve burn wound healing and reduce scarring. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 45702–45713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Toriello, M.; Afsari, M.; Shon, H.K.; Tijing, L.D. Progress on the fabrication and application of electrospun nanofiber composites. Membranes 2020, 10, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Akhmetova, A.; Heinz, A. Electrospinning proteins for wound healing purposes: Opportunities and challenges. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jao, D.; Beachley, V.Z. Continuous dual-track fabrication of polymer micro-/nanofibers based on direct drawing. ACS Macro Lett. 2019, 8, 588–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shin, S.; Menk, F.; Kim, Y.; Lim, J.; Char, K.; Zentel, R.; Choi, T.L. Living light-induced crystallization-driven self-assembly for rapid preparation of semiconducting nanofibers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 6088–6094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qin, W.; Li, J.; Tu, J.; Yang, H.; Chen, Q.; Liu, H. Fabrication of porous chitosan membranes composed of nanofibers by low temperature thermally induced phase separation, and their adsorption behavior for Cu2+. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 178, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kamin, Z.; Abdulrahim, N.; Misson, M.; Chiam, C.K.; Sarbatly, R.; Krishnaiah, D.; Bono, A. Use of melt blown polypropylene nanofiber templates to obtain homogenous pore channels in glycidyl methacrylate/ethyl dimethacrylate-based monoliths. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2021, 208, 661–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bazmandeh, A.Z.; Mirzaei, E.; Fadaie, M.; Shirian, S.; Ghasemi, Y. Dual spinneret electrospun nanofibrous/gel structure of chitosan-hyaluronic acid as a wound dressing: In-vitro and in-vivo studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 359–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sabra, S.; Ragab, D.M.; Agwa, M.M.; Rohani, S. Recent advances in electrospun nanofibers for some biomedical applications. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 144, 105224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abazari, M.F.; Nasiri, N.; Nejati, F.; Kohandani, M.; Hajati-Birgani, N.; Sadeghi, S.; Piri, P.; Soleimanifar, F.; Rezaei-Tavirani, M.; Mansouri, V. Acceleration of osteogenic differentiation by sustained release of BMP2 in PLLA/graphene oxide nanofibrous scaffold. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2021, 32, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mozaffari, A.; Gashti, M.P.; Mirjalili, M.; Parsania, M. Argon and argon-oxygen plasma surface modification of gelatin nanofibers for tissue engineering applications. Membranes 2021, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Luraghi, A.; Peri, F.; Moroni, L. Electrospinning for drug delivery applications: A review. J. Control. Release 2021, 334, 463–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Li, Z.; Wen, W.; Chen, X.; Zhu, L.; Cheng, G.; Liao, Z.; Huang, H.; Ming, L. Release characteristics of an essential oil component encapsulated with cyclodextrin shell matrices. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2021, 18, 487–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yu, D.G. Preface-bettering drug delivery knowledge from pharmaceutical techniques and excipients. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2021, 18, 2–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schuhladen, K.; Raghu, S.N.V.; Liverani, L.; Neščáková, Z.; Boccaccini, A.R. Production of a novel poly(ɛ-caprolactone)-methylcellulose electrospun wound dressing by incorporating bioactive glass and Manuka honey. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B 2021, 109, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bootdee, K.; Nithitanakul, M. Poly (d, l-lactide-co-glycolide) nanospheres within composite poly (vinyl alcohol)/aloe vera electrospun nanofiber as a novel wound dressing for controlled release of drug. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2021, 70, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lan, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Tian, F.; Miao, X.; Wang, H.; Tang, Y. Coaxial electrospun PVA/PCL nanofibers with dual release of tea polyphenols and ε-poly(L-lysine) as antioxidant and antibacterial wound dressing materials. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 601, 120525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bonferoni, M.C.; Rossi, S.; Sandri, G.; Caramella, C.; Del Fante, C.; Perotti, C.; Miele, D.; Vigani, B.; Ferrari, F. Bioactive medications for the delivery of platelet derivatives to skin wounds. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2019, 16, 472–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Keshvardoostchokami, M.; Majidi, S.S.; Huo, P.; Ramachandran, R.; Chen, M.; Liu, B. Electrospun nanofibers of natural and synthetic polymers as artificial extracellular matrix for tissue engineering. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  34. Augustine, R.; Rehman, S.R.U.; Ahmed, R.; Zahid, A.A.; Sharifi, M.; Falahati, M.; Hasan, A. Electrospun chitosan membranes containing bioactive and therapeutic agents for enhanced wound healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 156, 153–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ather, S.; Harding, K.G.; Tate, S.J. Wound management and dressings. In Advanced Textiles for Wound Care, 2nd ed.; The Textile Institute Book Series; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang, W.; Lu, K.J.; Yu, C.H.; Huang, Q.L.; Du, Y.Z. Nano-drug delivery systems in wound treatment and skin regeneration. J. Nanobiotechnology 2019, 17, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Iacob, A.T.; Drăgan, M.; Ionescu, O.M.; Profire, L.; Ficai, A.; Andronescu, E.; Confederat, L.G.; Lupascu, D. An overview of biopolymeric electrospun nanofibers based on polysaccharides for wound healing management. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 1–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tottoli, E.M.; Dorati, R.; Genta, I.; Chiesa, E.; Pisani, S.; Conti, B. Skin wound healing process and new emerging technologies for skin wound care and regeneration. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Y.; Feng, Q.; Li, Z.; Bai, X.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Y. Evaluating the effect of integra seeded with adipose tissue-derived stem cells or fibroblasts in wound healing. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2020, 17, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Smet, S.; Probst, S.; Holloway, S.; Fourie, A.; Beele, H.; Beeckman, D. The measurement properties of assessment tools for chronic wounds: A systematic review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2021, 121, 103998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sen, C.K. Human wounds and its burden: An updated compendium of estimates. Adv. Wound Care 2019, 8, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Homaeigohar, S.; Boccaccini, A.R. Antibacterial biohybrid nanofibers for wound dressings. Acta Biomater. 2020, 107, 25–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Eaglstein, W.H. Moist wound healing with occlusive dressings: A clinical focus. Dermatol. Surg. 2001, 27, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Driver, V.R.; Gould, L.J.; Dotson, P.; Gibbons, G.W.; Li, W.W.; Ennis, W.J.; Kirsner, R.S.; Eaglstein, W.H.; Bolton, L.L.; Carter, M.J. Identification and content validation of wound therapy clinical endpoints relevant to clinical practice and patient values for FDA approval. Part 1. Survey of the wound care community. Wound Repair Regen. 2017, 25, 454–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mouro, C.; Gomes, A.P.; Ahonen, M.; Fangueiro, R.; Gouveia, I.C. Chelidonium majus 1. Incorporated emulsion electrospun PCL/PVA_PEC nanofibrous meshes for antibacterial wound dressing applications. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Montaser, A.S.; Rehan, M.; EI-Senousy, W.M.; Zaghloul, S. Designing strategy for coating cotton gauze fabrics and its application in wound healing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 244, 116479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dhivya, S.; Padma, V.V.; Santhini, E. Wound dressings—A review. Biomedicine 2015, 5, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Chaganti, P.; Gordon, I.; Chao, J.H.; Zehtabchi, S. A systematic review of foam dressings for partial thickness burns. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2019, 37, 1184–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Rezvani Ghomi, E.; Khalili, S.; Nouri Khorasani, S.; Esmaeely Neisiany, R.; Ramakrishna, S. Wound dressings: Current advances and future directions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Cascone, S.; Lamberti, G. Hydrogel-based commercial products for biomedical applications: A review. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 573, 118803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ahmad, A.; Mubarak, N.M.; Jannat, F.T.; Ashfaq, T.; Santulli, C.; Rizwan, M.; Najda, A.; Bin-Jumah, M.; Abdel-Daim, M.M.; Hussain, S.; et al. A critical review on the synthesis of natural sodium alginate based composite materials: An innovative biological polymer for biomedical delivery applications. Processes 2021, 9, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tang, Y.; Lan, X.; Liang, C.; Zhong, Z.; Xie, R.; Zhou, Y.; Miao, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, W. Honey loaded alginate/PVA nanofibrous membrane as potential bioactive wound dressing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 219, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Xiao, L.; Jia, G. Modern wound dressing using polymers/biopolymers. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 07, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kuznetsova, T.A.; Andryukov, B.G.; Besednova, N.N.; Zaporozhets, T.S.; Kalinin, A.V. Marine algae polysaccharides as basis for wound dressings, drug delivery, and tissue engineering: A review. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shi, C.; Wang, C.; Liu, H.; Li, Q.; Li, R.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Shao, Y.; Wang, J. Selection of appropriate wound dressing for various wounds. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  56. Nuutila, K.; Eriksson, E. Moist wound healing with commonly available dressings. Adv. Wound Care 2021, 1, 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  57. Weller, C.D.; Team, V.; Sussman, G. First-line interactive wound dressing update: A comprehensive review of the evidence. Front. Pharmacology 2020, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Palmese, L.L.; Thapa, R.K.; Sullivan, M.O.; Kiick, K.L. Hybrid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2019, 24, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Varaprasad, K.; Jayaramudu, T.; Kanikireddy, V.; Toro, C.; Sadiku, E.R. Alginatebased composite materials for wound dressing application: A mini review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 236, 116025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Asanarong, O.; Minh Quan, V.; Boonrungsiman, S.; Sukyai, P. Bioactive wound dressing using bacterial cellulose loaded with papain composite: Morphology, loading/release and antibacterial properties. Eur. Polym. J. 2021, 143, 110224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ambekar, R.S.; Kandasubramanian, B. Advancements in nanofibers for wound dressing: A review. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 117, 304–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mihai, M.M.; Dima, M.B.; Dima, B.; Holban, A.M. Nanomaterials for wound healing and infection control. Materials 2019, 12, 2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Zeng, L.; Qiao, Z.; Liu, X.; Liu, H.; Zhang, J.; Ding, J. Fabrication of electrospun polymer nanofibers with diverse morphologies. Molecules 2019, 24, 834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Aidana, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Chang, S.; Wang, K.; Yu, D.-G. Fast dissolution electrospun medicated nanofibers for effective delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2021, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Nauman, S.; Lubineau, G.; Alharbi, H.F. Post processing strategies for the enhancement of mechanical properties of enms (Electrospun nanofibrous membranes): A review. Membranes 2021, 11, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ma, H.; Burger, C.; Chu, B.; Hsiao, B.S. Electrospun nanofibers for environmental protection. Handb. Fibrous Mater. 2020, 773–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhao, K.; Kang, S.X.; Yang, Y.Y.; Yu, D.G. Electrospun functional nanofiber membrane for antibiotic removal in water: Review. Polymers 2021, 13, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, M.; Yu, D.-G.; Li, X.; Williams, G.R. The development and bio-applications of multifluid electrospinning. Mater. Highlights 2020, 1, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, Y.; Tian, L.; Zhu, T.; Mei, J.; Chen, Z.; Yu, D.G. Electrospun aspirin/Eudragit/lipid hybrid nanofibers for colon-targeted delivery using an energy-saving process. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2021, 37, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Li, Y.; Zhu, J.; Cheng, H.; Li, G.; Cho, H.; Jiang, M.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, X. Developments of advanced electrospinning techniques: A critical review. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2021, 2100410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Xin, R.; Ma, H.; Venkateswaran, S.; Hsiao, B.S. Electrospun nanofibrous adsorption membranes for wasterwater treatment: Mechanical strength enhancement. Chem. Res. Chinese Univ. 2021, 37, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zare, M.; Dziemidowicz, K.; Williams, G.R.; Ramakrishna, S. Encapsulation of pharmaceutical and nutraceutical active ingredients using electrospinning processes. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Buzgo, M.; Mickova, A.; Rampichova, M.; Doupnik, M. Blend electrospinning, coaxial electrospinning, and emulsion electrospinning techniques. In Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2018; pp. 325–347. [Google Scholar]
  74. Wu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Gu, J.; Zhou, W.; Liang, X.; Zhou, G.; Han, C.C.; Xu, S.; Liu, Y. Mechanism of a long-term controlled drug release system based on simple blended electrospun fibers. J. Control. Release 2020, 320, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Abdul Hameed, M.M.; Mohamed Khan, S.A.P.; Thamer, B.M.; E1-Enizi, A.; Aldalbahi, A.; El-Hamshary, H.; E1-Newehy, M.H. Core-shell nanofibers from poly (vinyl alcohol) based biopolymers using emulsion electrospinning as drug delivery system for cephalexin drug. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A Pure Appl. Chem. 2020, 58, 130–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Coimbra, P.; Freitas, J.P.; Gonçalves, T.; Gil, M.H.; Figueiredo, M. Preparation of gentamicin sulfate eluting fiber mats by emulsion and by suspension electrospinning. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 94, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Su, S.; Bedir, T.; Kalkandelen, C.; Ozan Başar, A.; Turkoğlu Şaşmazel, H.; Bulent Ustundag, C.; Sengor, M.; Gunduz, O. Coaxial and emulsion electrospinning of extracted hyaluronic acid and keratin based nanofibers for wound healing applications. Eur. Polym. J. 2021, 142, 110158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhan, F.; Yan, X.; Li, J.; Sheng, F.; Li, B. Encapsulation of tangeretin in PVA/PAA crosslinking electrospun fibers by emulsion-electrospinning: Morphology characterization, slowrelease, and antioxidant activity assessment. Food Chem. 2021, 337, 127763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Rathore, P.; Schiffman, J.D. Beyond the single-nozzle: Coaxial electrospinning enables innovative nanofiber chemistries, geometries, and applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 48–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Han, D.; Steckl, A.j. Coaxial electrospinning formation of complex polymer fibers and their applications. Chempluschem 2019, 84, 1453–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Pant, B.; Park, M.; Park, S.J. Drug delivery applications of core-sheath nanofibers prepared by coaxial electrospinning: A review. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Yu, D.G.; Liu, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, P. Electrospun PVP-core/PHBV-shell nanofibers to eliminate tailing off for an improved sustained release of curcumin. Mol. Pharm. 2021, 438, 232–239. [Google Scholar]
  83. Yan, E.; Jiang, J.; Yang, X.; Fan, L.; Wang, Y.; An, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Lu, B.; Wang, D.; Zhang, D. pH-sensitive core-shell electrospun nanofibers based on polyvinyl alcohol/polycaprolactone as a potential drug delivery system for the chemotherapy against cervical cancer. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 101455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, M.; Wang, K.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yu, D.G. Electrospun environment remediation nanofibers using unspinnable liquids as the sheath fluids: A review. Polymers 2020, 12, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Yu, D.G.; Branford-White, C.J.; Chatterton, N.P.; White, K.; Zhu, L.M.; Shen, X.X.; Nie, W. Electrospinning of concentrated polymer solutions. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 10743–10746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gupta, P.; Wilkes, G.L. Some investigations on the fiber formation by utilizing a side-by-side bicomponent electrospinning approach. Polymer 2003, 44, 6353–6359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wang, M.; Li, D.; Li, J.; Li, S.; Chen, Z.; Yu, D.G.; Liu, Z.; Guo, J.Z. Electrospun Janus zein-PVP nanofibers provide a two-stage controlled release of poorly water-soluble drugs. Mater. Des. 2020, 196, 109075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Li, D.; Wang, M.; Song, W.L.; Yu, D.G.; Bligh, S.W.A. Electrospun Janus beads-on-a-string structures for different types of controlled release profiles of double drugs. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, R.; Cheng, Z.; Yu, X.; Wang, S.; Han, Z.; Kang, L. Preparation of antibacterial PCL/PVP-AgNP Janus nanofibers by uniaxial electrospinning. Mater. Lett. 2019, 254, 206–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zheng, X.; Kang, S.; Wang, K.; Yang, Y.; Yu, D.G.; Wan, F.; Williams, G.R.; Bligh, S.W. A Combination of structure-performance and shape-performance relationships for better biphasic release in electrospun Janus fibers. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 596, 120203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Chang, S.; Wang, M.; Zhang, F.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Yu, D.G.; Shen, H. Sheath-separate-core nanocomposites fabricated using a trifluid electrospinning. Mater. Des. 2020, 192, 108782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Nagiah, N.; Murdock, C.J.; Bhattacharjee, M.; Nair, L.; Laurencin, C.T. Development of tripolymeric triaxial electrospun fibrous matrices for dual drug delivery applications. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Ding, Y.; Dou, C.; Chang, S.; Xie, Z.; Yu, D.G.; Liu, Y.; Shao, J. Core-shell Eudragit S100 nanofibers prepared via triaxial electrospinning to provide a colon-targeted extended drug release. Polymers 2020, 12, 2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhao, K.; Lu, Z.H.; Zhao, P.; Kang, S.X.; Yang, Y.Y.; Yu, D.G. Modified tri-axial electrospun functional core-shell nanofibrous membranes for natural photodegradation of antibiotics. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 425, 131455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wang, M.; Hou, J.; Yu, D.G.; Li, S.; Zhu, J.; Chen, Z. Electrospun tri-layer nanodepots for sustained release of acyclovir. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 846, 156471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Yu, D.G.; Wang, M.; Li, X.; Liu, X.; Zhu, L.M.; Annie Bligh, S.W. Multifluid electrospinning for the generation of complex nanostructures. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2020, 12, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Zhang, X.; Chi, C.; Chen, J.; Zhang, X.; Gong, M.; Wang, X.; Yan, J.; Shi, R.; Zhang, L.; Xue, J. Electrospun quad-axial nanofibers for controlled and sustained drug delivery. Mater. Des. 2021, 206, 109732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, F.; Hu, S.; Jia, Q.; Zhang, L. Advances in electrospinning of natural biomaterials for wound dressing. J. Nanomater. 2020, 2020, 8719859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Memic, A.; Abudula, T.; Mohammed, H.S.; Joshi Navare, K.; Colombani, T.; Bencherif, S.A. Latest progress in electrospun nanofibers for wound healing applications. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2019, 2, 952–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Juncos Bombin, A.D.; Dunne, N.J.; McCarthy, H.O. Electrospinning of natural polymers for the production of nanofibres for wound healing applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 114, 110994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Naomi, R.; Bahari, H.; Ridzuan, P.M.; Othman, F. Natural-based biomaterial for skin wound healing (Gelatin vs. collagen): Expert review. Polymers 2021, 13, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. AL-Jbour, N.D.; Beg, M.D.; Gimbun, J.; Alam, A.K.M.M. An overview of chitosan nanofibers and their applications in the drug delivery process. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2019, 16, 272–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kalantari, K.; Afifi, A.M.; Jahangirian, H.; Webster, T.J. Biomedical applications of chitosan electrospun nanofibers as a green polymer – Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 588–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Bakshi, P.S.; Selvakumar, D.; Kadirvelu, K.; Kumar, N.S. Chitosan as an environment friendly biomaterial – a review on recent modifications and applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 150, 1072–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Xia, J.; Zhang, H.; Yu, F.; Pei, Y.; Luo, X. Superclear, Porous cellulose membranes with chitosan-coated nanofibers for visualized cutaneous wound healing dressing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 24370–24379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Naomi, R.; Ratanavaraporn, J.; Fauzi, M.B. Comprehensive review of hybrid collagen and silk fibroin for cutaneous wound healing. Materials 2020, 13, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Patil, P.P.; Reagan, M.R.; Bohara, R.A. Silk fibroin and silk-based biomaterial derivatives for ideal wound dressings. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 4613–4627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hadisi, Z.; Farokhi, M.; Bakhsheshi-Rad, H.R.; Jahanshahi, M.; Hasanpour, S.; Pagan, E.; Dolatshahi-Pirouz, A.; Zhang, Y.S.; Kundu, S.C.; Akbari, M. Hyaluronic acid (HA)-based silk fibroin/zinc oxide core-shell electrospun dressing for burn wound management. Macromol. Biosci. 2020, 20, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kothale, D.; Verma, U.; Dewangan, N.; Jana, P.; Jain, A.; Jain, D. Alginate as promising natural polymer for pharmaceutical, food, and biomedical applications. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2020, 17, 755–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kurakula, M.; Rao, G.S.N.K. Pharmaceutical assessment of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP): As excipient from conventional to controlled delivery systems with a spotlight on COVID-19 inhibition. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 60, 102046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Chinatangkul, N.; Tubtimsri, S.; Panchapornpon, D.; Akkaramongkolporn, P.; Limmatvapirat, C.; Limmatvapirat, S. Design and characterization of electrospun shellac-polyvinylpyrrolidone blended micro/nanofibres loaded with monolaurin for application in wound healing. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 562, 258–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Raina, N.; Pahwa, R.; Khosla, J.K.; Gupta, P.N.; Gupta, M. Polycaprolactone-based materials in wound healing applications. Polym. Bull. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. He, J.; Liang, Y.; Shi, M.; Guo, B. Anti-oxidant electroactive and antibacterial nanofibrous wound dressings based on poly(ε-caprolactone)/quaternized chitosan-graft-polyaniline for full-thickness skin wound healing. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 385, 123464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Teixeira, M.A.; Amorim, M.T.P.; Felgueiras, H.P. Poly (vinyl alcohol)-based nanofibrous electrospun scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Ali, A.; Mohebbullah, M.; Shahid, M.A.; Alam, S.; Uddin, M.N.; Miah, M.S.; Jamal, M.S.I.; Khan, M.S. PVA-Nigella sativa nanofibrous mat: Antibacterial efficacy and wound healing potentiality. J. Text. Inst. 2020, 1831168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zhu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Xue, Y.; Cheng, X.; Zhao, W.; Wang, J.; He, R.; Wan, Q.; Pei, X. Tazarotene released from aligned electrospun membrane facilitates cutaneous wound healing by promoting angiogenesis. ACS Appl. Mater, Interfaces 2019, 11, 36141–36153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Ramalingam, R.; Dhand, C.; Mayandi, V.; Leung, C.M.; Ezhilarasu, H.; Karuppannan, S.K.; Prasannan, P.; Ong, S.T.; Sunderasan, N.; Kaliappan, I.; et al. Core-Shell structured antimicrobial nanofiber dressings, containing herbal extract and antibiotics combination for the prevention of biofilms and promotion of cutaneous wound healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 24356–24369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Zou, P.; Lee, W.H.; Gao, Z.; Qin, D.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Sun, T.; Gao, Y. Wound dressing from polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan electrospun fiber membrane loaded with OH-CATH30 nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 232, 115786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Khan, A.R.; Huang, K.; Jinzhong, Z.; Zhu, T.; Morsi, Y.; Aldalbahi, A.; E1-Newehy, M.; Yan, X.; Mo, X. PLCL/Silk fibroin based antibacterial nano wound dressing encapsulating oregano essential oil: Fabrication, characterization and biological evaluation. Colloids Surf. B 2020, 196, 111352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Li, H.; Chen, X.; Lu, W.; Wang, J.; Xu, Y.; Guo, Y. Application of electrospinning in antibacterial field. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Keirouz, A.; Chung, M.; Kwon, J.; Fortunato, G.; Radacsi, N. 2D and 3D electrospinning technologies for the fabrication of nanofibrous scaffolds for skin tissue engineering: A review. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2020, 12, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Naskar, A.; Kim, K.S. Recent advances in nanomaterial-based wound-healing therapeutics. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Abdalla, S.S.I.; Katas, H.; Azmi, F.; Busra, M.F.M. Antibacterial and anti-biofilm biosynthesised silver and gold nanoparticles for medical applications: Mechanism of action, toxicity and current status. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2020, 17, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Augustine, R.; Hasan, A.; Patan, N.K.; Dalvi, Y.B.; Varghese, R.; Antony, A.; Unni, R.N.; Sandhyarani, N.; Moustafa, A.E.A. Cerium oxide nanoparticle incorporated electrospun poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) membranes for diabetic wound healing applications. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 6, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Yang, J.; Wang, K.; Yu, D.G.; Yang, Y.; Bligh, S.W.A.; Williams, G.R. Electrospun Janus nanofibers loaded with a drug and inorganic nanoparticles as an effective antibacterial wound dressing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 111, 110805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Jafari, A.; Amirsadeghi, A.; Hassanajili, S.; Azarpira, N. Bioactive antibacterial bilayer PCL/gelatin nanofibrous scaffold promotes full - thickness wound healing. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 583, 119413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Samadian, H.; Zamiri, S.; Ehterami, A.; Farzamfar, S.; Vaez, A.; Khastar, H.; Alam, M.; Ai, A.; Derakhshankhah, H.; Allahyari, Z.; et al. Electrospun cellulose acetate/gelatin nanofibrous wound dressing containing berberine for acetate/gelatin nanofibrous wound dressing containing berberine diabetic foot ulcer healing: In vitro and in vivo studies. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. López-Calderón, H.D.; Avilés-Arnaut, H.; Galán Wong, L.J.; Almaguer - Cantú, V.; Laguna-Camacho, J.R.; Calderón-Ramón, C.; Escalante- Martínez, J.E.; Arévalo-Niño, K. Electrospun polyvinylpyrrolidone-gelatin and cellulose acetate bi-Layer scaffold loaded with gentamicin as possible wound dressing. Polymers 2020, 12, 2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ahmadian, S.; Ghorbani, M.; Mahmoodzadeh, F. Silver sulfadiazine-loaded electrospun ethyl cellulose/polylactic acid/collagen nanofibrous mats with antibacterial properties for wound healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 1555–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Ghorbani, M.; Nezhad-Mokhtari, P.; Ramazani, S. Aloe vera-loaded nanofibrous scaffold based on zein/polycaprolactone/collagen for wound healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 153, 921–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Yang, S.; Li, X.; Liu, P.; Zhang, M.; Wang, C.; Zhang, B. Multifunctional chitosan/polycaprolactone nanofiber scaffolds with varied dual-drug release for wound-healing applications. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 6, 4666–4676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Ribeiro, A.S.; Costa, S.M.; Ferreira, D.P.; Calhelha, R.C.; Barros, L.; Stoiković, D.; Soković, M.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Fangueiro, R. Chitosan/nanocellulose electrospun fibers with enhanced antibacterial and antifungal activity for wound dressing applications. React. Funct. Polym. 2021, 159, 104808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Peng, Y.; Ma, Y.; Bao, Y.; Liu, Z.; Chen, L.; Dai, F.; Li, Z. Electrospun PLGA/SF/artemisinin composite nanofibrous membranes for wound dressing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 183, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Agarwal, Y.; Rajinikanth, P.S.; Ranjan, S.; Tiwari, U.; Balasubramnaiam, J.; Pandey, P.; Arya, D.K.; Anand, S.; Deepak, P. Curcumin loaded polycaprolactone-/polyvinyl alcohol-silk fibroin based electrospun nanofibrous mat for rapid healing of diabetic wound: An in-vitro and in-vivo studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 176, 376–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Najafiasl, M.; Osfouri, S.; Azin, R.; Zaeri, S. Alginate-based electrospun core/shell nanofibers containing dexpanthenol: A good candidate for wound dressing. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 101708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Najafi, S.; Gholipour- Kanani, A.; Eslahi, N.; Bahrami, S.H. Study on release of cardamom extract as an antibacterial agent from electrospun scaffold based on sodium alginate. J. Text. Inst. 2021, 112, 1482–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Hajikhani, M.; EMAM-Djomeh, Z.; Askari, G. Fabrication and characterization of mucoadhesive bioplastic patch via coaxial polylactic acid (PLA) based electrospun nanofibers with antimicrobial and wound healing application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 172, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Yin, J.; Xu, L. Batch preparation of electrospun polycaprolactone/chitosan/aloe vera blended nanofiber membranes for novel wound dressing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 160, 352–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Fahimirad, S.; Abtahi, H.; Satei, P.; Ghaznavi-Rad, E.; Moslehi, M.; Ganji, A. Wound healing performance of PCL/chitosan based electrospun nanofiber electrosprayed with curcumin loaded chitosan nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 259, 117640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. El Fawal, G.; Hong, H.; Mo, X.; Wang, H. Fabrication of scaffold based on gelatin and polycaprolactone (PCL) for wound dressing application. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021, 63, 102501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Ghiyasi, Y.; Salahi, E.; Esfahani, H. Synergy effect of Urtica dioica and ZnO NPs on microstructure, antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity of electrospun PCL scaffold for wound dressing application. Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 26, 102163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Unalan, I.; Endlein, S.J.; Slavik, B.; Buettner, A.; Goldmann, W.H.; Detsch, R.; Boccaccini, A.R. Evaluation of electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone)/gelatin nanofiber mats containing clove essential oil for antibacterial wound dressing. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Adeli, H.; Khorasani, M.T.; Parvazinia, M. Wound dressing based on electrospun PVA/chitosan/starch nanofibrous mats: Fabrication, antibacterial and cytocompatibility evaluation and in vitro healing assay. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 122, 238–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Wang, S.; Yan, F.; Ren, P.; Li, Y.; Wu, Q.; Fang, X.; Chen, F.; Wang, C. Incorporation of metal-organic frameworks into electrospun chitosan/poly (vinyl alcohol) nanofibrous membrane with enhanced antibacterial activity for wound dressing application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 158, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Kalalinia, F.; Taherzadeh, Z.; Jirofti, N.; Amiri, N.; Foroghinia, N.; Beheshti, M.; Bazzaz, B.S.F.; Hashemi, M.; Shahroodi, A.; Pishavar, E.; et al. Evaluation of wound healing efficiency of vancomycin-loaded electropunk chitosan/poly ethylene oxide nanofibers in full thickness wound model of rat. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 177, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Amiri, N.; Ajami, S.; Shahroodi, A.; Jannatabadi, N.; Amiri Darban, S.; Fazly Bazzaz, B.S.; Pishavar, E.; Kalalinia, F.; Movaffagh, J. Teicoplanin-loaded chitosan-PEO nanofibers for local antibiotic delivery and wound healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 645–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Dong, W.H.; Liu, J.X.; Mou, X.J.; Liu, G.S.; Huang, X.W.; Yan, X.; Ning, X.; Ning, X.; Russell, S.J.; Long, Y.Z. Performance of polyvinyl pyrrolidone-isatis root antibacterial wound dressings produced in situ by handheld electrospinner. Colloids Surf. B 2020, 188, 110766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Qin, M.; Mou, X.J.; Dong, W.H.; Liu, J.X.; Liu, H.; Dai, Z.; Huang, X.W.; Wang, N.; Yan, X. In situ electrospinning wound healing films composed of zein and clove essential oil. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2020, 305, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Yue, Y.; Gong, X.; Jiao, W.; Li, Y.; Yin, X.; Si, Y.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. In-situ electrospinning of thymol-loaded polyurethane fibrous membranes for waterproof, breathable, and antibacterial wound dressing application. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 592, 310–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Xu, H.; Xu, X.; Li, S.; Song, W.-L.; Yu, D.-G.; Annie Bligh, S.W. The effects of drug heterogeneous distributions with core-sheath nanostructures on its sustained release profiles. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Xiaoxia, X.; Jing, S.; Dongbin, X.; Yonggang, T.; Jingke, Z.; Hulai, W. Realgar nanoparticles inhibit migration, invasion and metastasis in a mouse model of breast cancer by suppressing matrix metalloproteinases and angiogenesis. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2020, 17, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Eskiler, G.G.; Cecener, G.; Dikmen, G.; Egeli, U.; Tunca, B. Talazoparib loaded solid lipid nanoparticles: Preparation, characterization and evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy in vitro. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2019, 16, 511–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Tan, G.Z.; Zhou, Y. Electrospinning of biomimetic fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering: A review. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2019, 69, 947–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Islam, M.S.; Ang, B.C.; Andriyana, A.; Afifi, A.M. A review on fabrication of nanofibers via electrospinning and their applications. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Yang, X.; Wang, J.; Guo, H.; Liu, L.; Xu, W.; Duan, G. Structural design toward functional materials by electrospinning: A review. E-Polymers 2020, 20, 682–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Statistics of literature retrieval on the “Web of Science” platform with the subject of “Wound dressing” and “Electrospun wound dressing”, respectively.
Figure 1. Statistics of literature retrieval on the “Web of Science” platform with the subject of “Wound dressing” and “Electrospun wound dressing”, respectively.
Membranes 11 00770 g001
Figure 2. Structure of different wound dressing.
Figure 2. Structure of different wound dressing.
Membranes 11 00770 g002
Figure 3. Process classification of electrospinning technology (adapted from [72], with permission from MDPI, 2021).
Figure 3. Process classification of electrospinning technology (adapted from [72], with permission from MDPI, 2021).
Membranes 11 00770 g003
Figure 4. Common polymers used in electrospun wound dressings.
Figure 4. Common polymers used in electrospun wound dressings.
Membranes 11 00770 g004
Figure 5. (A) Chitosan extracted from natural sources and developed into electrospun fiber membranes and its application in wound healing [34]; (B) a schematic diagram of the wound healing process of a drug-loaded chitosan dressing [103]; (C) the sources of fibroin [107]; (D) preparation and in vitro and in vivo study of HA/SF-ZO nanofiber by coaxial electrospinning [108].
Figure 5. (A) Chitosan extracted from natural sources and developed into electrospun fiber membranes and its application in wound healing [34]; (B) a schematic diagram of the wound healing process of a drug-loaded chitosan dressing [103]; (C) the sources of fibroin [107]; (D) preparation and in vitro and in vivo study of HA/SF-ZO nanofiber by coaxial electrospinning [108].
Membranes 11 00770 g005
Figure 6. (A) Electrospinning PCL/QCSP nanofiber membrane with anti-bacteria, anti-oxidant, stretchability and electroactivity [113]; (B) preparation of coaxial electrospinning nanofiber mat and its excellent properties [117].
Figure 6. (A) Electrospinning PCL/QCSP nanofiber membrane with anti-bacteria, anti-oxidant, stretchability and electroactivity [113]; (B) preparation of coaxial electrospinning nanofiber mat and its excellent properties [117].
Membranes 11 00770 g006
Figure 7. (A) PHBV/nCeO2 nanofiber membrane in cell adhesion, migration and wound healing research [124]; (B) the electrospun antibacterial bilayer nanofiber scaffold is used to promote the various characterization analysis of the full-thickness skin defect healing in mice [126].
Figure 7. (A) PHBV/nCeO2 nanofiber membrane in cell adhesion, migration and wound healing research [124]; (B) the electrospun antibacterial bilayer nanofiber scaffold is used to promote the various characterization analysis of the full-thickness skin defect healing in mice [126].
Membranes 11 00770 g007
Figure 8. (A) In situ electrospinning process [148]; (B) [149] (a) schematic diagram of portable electrospinning device and preparation of EPU/FPU/thymol nanofiber; (b) schematic diagram of the breathable, waterproof and antibacterial functions of EPU/FPU/Thymol nanofiber.
Figure 8. (A) In situ electrospinning process [148]; (B) [149] (a) schematic diagram of portable electrospinning device and preparation of EPU/FPU/thymol nanofiber; (b) schematic diagram of the breathable, waterproof and antibacterial functions of EPU/FPU/Thymol nanofiber.
Membranes 11 00770 g008
Figure 9. Structure, performance and application of electrospun nanofiber.
Figure 9. Structure, performance and application of electrospun nanofiber.
Membranes 11 00770 g009
Table 1. Types of wound dressing.
Table 1. Types of wound dressing.
Nature CategoryAdvantagesDisadvantagesRef.
Traditional
wound dressing
Gauze, lint, bandageEasy to use and economical1. Dry, unable to maintain a moist healing environment
2. Adhering to the wound site is difficult to remove
[46]
Modern wound dressingFilm1. Transparent, can observe wound changes
2. Form a bacterial barrier
3. Gas and water vapor permeability
1. Absorptive capacity is not strong
2. Obstruct the regeneration of epithelial tissue
[47]
Foam1. High water absorption performance to maintain the moist environment of the wound
2. Change the dressing without damage
1. Weak adhesion
2. Completely opaque
[48]
Hydrocolloid1. Stimulate tissue autolysis and debridement
2. The closed structure blocks the invasion of external bacteria
1. Poor degradability
2. Produce a special smell
[49]
Hydrogel1. Ability to replenish water and maintain a humid environment
2. Comfortable and easy to replace
1. No adhesion, low mechanical strength
2. High water content, limited absorption capacity, not suitable for wounds with high exudate
[50]
Alginate1. Non-toxic, fast hemostasis
2. Good air permeability
3. Biodegradation
Not suitable for dry wounds[51]
Bioactive wound dressingDrug-loaded dressing, antibacterial dressing1. Good biocompatibility
2. Anti-inflammatory and antibacterial
3. Promote the growth of cells and tissues
Induce immune response[52]
Table 2. The latest literature on polymer materials and bioactive ingredients used in electrospinning to promote skin wound healing.
Table 2. The latest literature on polymer materials and bioactive ingredients used in electrospinning to promote skin wound healing.
Scaffold MaterialAdditional PolymerBioactive IngredientsSolventElectrospinning TechniqueHighlightsRef.
GelatinCABerberineHFPBlendHas strong antibacterial activity and is suitable for the management and treatment of diabetic foot ulcer[127]
CA/PVPGentamicinAcetic acid, ethanolBi-layerThermal stability, wettability characteristics and antibacterial activity[128]
CollagenEC/PLASilver sulfadiazineChloroform, ethanolBlendThe antibacterial performance showed inhibitory activity against Bacillus (9.71 ± 1.15 mm) and E. coli (12.46 ± 1.31 mm), promoted cell proliferation and adhesion [129]
Zein/PCLn-ZnO, aloe veraChloroform, ethanolBlendThe developed nanofibers revealed good cell compatibility[130]
CSPCLLidocaine hydrochloride, mupirocinHFIP, DCMDualHave the functions of promoting hemostasis, antibacterial, and drug release.[131]
PEO/CNCAcacia extractAcetic acidBlendA continuous release of natural acacia extract from nanofibers occurred during 24 h[132]
SFPLGAArtemisininHFIPBlendThe fabricated membrane shows anti-inflammatory properties without cytotoxicity[133]
PCL/PVACurcuminFormic acid, dichloromethaneBlendAccelerate wound healing in diabetic mice[134]
AlginatePVA/CSDexpanthenolAcetic acidCoaxialNot only is it non-toxic to fibroblasts, but it also has a certain effect on cell attachment and morphology[135]
PVACardamom extractDistilled waterBlendHave good biocompatibility and antibacterial properties[136]
PVPECCIP, AgNPEthanol, acetic acid, acetoneSide-by-sideJanus fiber has good bactericidal activity[125]
PLA/PEO/CollagenCefazolinDCM, DMF, HFIP, ethanolCoaxialAntibacterial studies on wounds show that they can effectively inhibit the growth of microorganisms.[137]
PCLCSAloe veraAcetic acidBlendHave good antibacterial properties and biocompatibility[138]
CSCurcuminEthanol, acetic acidBlendShows antibacterial, anti-oxidant and wound healing capabilities[139]
GelatinOregano oilHFIPBlendGood biocompatibility and antibacterial activity[140]
/Urtica dioica, n-ZnODMF, DCMBlendThe hybrid scaffold shows high antibacterial activity and cell viability[141]
GelatinClove essential oilGlacial acetic acidBlendAntibacterial activity[142]
PVACS/Starch/Double-distilled water, acetic acidBlendProper tensile strength and elongation, excellent biocompatibility and antibacterial activity[143]
CS/Acetic acidBlendGood physical and chemical properties, biocompatibility and antibacterial properties[144]
PEOCSVancomycinAcetic acidBlendAntibacterial effects against S. aureus[145]
CSTeicoplaninAcetic acidDualWound closure was significantly improved[146]
HFP: Hexafluoropropylene, EC: Ethylcellulose, PLA: Polylactic acid, HFIP: 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol, DCM: Dichloromethane, PEO: Polyethene oxide, CNC: Cellulose nanocrystals, DMF: N,N-dimethylformamide.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, X.; Xu, H.; Zhang, M.; Yu, D.-G. Electrospun Medicated Nanofibers for Wound Healing: Review. Membranes 2021, 11, 770. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11100770

AMA Style

Liu X, Xu H, Zhang M, Yu D-G. Electrospun Medicated Nanofibers for Wound Healing: Review. Membranes. 2021; 11(10):770. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11100770

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Xinkuan, Haixia Xu, Mingxin Zhang, and Deng-Guang Yu. 2021. "Electrospun Medicated Nanofibers for Wound Healing: Review" Membranes 11, no. 10: 770. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11100770

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop