Next Article in Journal
New Insights in Potato Leaf Freezing by Infrared Thermography
Previous Article in Journal
Case Studies for Non-Detection of Islanding by Grid-Connected In-Parallel Photovoltaic and Electrical Energy Storage Systems Inverters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of a Silicon Nanowire Solar Cell on a Silicon-on-Insulator Substrate

1
Department of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Nagoya Institute of technology, Showa-ku, Nagoya-shi, Aichi 466-8555, Japan
2
Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku 464-8603, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(5), 818; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9050818
Submission received: 6 January 2019 / Revised: 15 February 2019 / Accepted: 20 February 2019 / Published: 26 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Nanotechnology and Applied Nanosciences)

Abstract

:
This study proposes metal-assisted chemical etching (MAE) as a facile method to fabricate silicon nanowire (SiNW) array structures, with high optical confinement for thin crystalline silicon solar cells. Conventional SiNW arrays are generally fabricated on Si wafer substrates. However, tests on conventional SiNW-based solar cells cannot determine whether the photo-current is derived from SiNWs or from the Si wafer. Herein, SiNW arrays were fabricated on a silicon-on-insulator substrate with a 10-μm-thick silicon layer for measuring the photocurrent of the SiNW only. The 9 μm-long p-type SiNW arrays were applied to a solar cell structure fabricated using an n-type H-doped amorphous Si layer, thereby confirming the photovoltaic effect. However, the device exhibited a conversion efficiency of 0.0017% because of a low short-circuit current (Jsc) and a low open-circuit voltage (Voc). The low Jsc resulted from a high series resistance and high absorption loss from the amorphous Si layer, whereas the low Voc resulted from the high surface recombination velocity of the SiNW array structure. Therefore, reducing the surface recombination of SiNW-based solar cells can improve their conversion efficiency.

1. Introduction

Crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar cells have a high conversion efficiency and low-fabrication cost [1,2,3,4]. However, the efficiency of c-Si solar cells is limited by Auger recombination. Recently, c-Si solar cells, composed of ultra-thin films, have attracted considerable attention because such cells generate a higher open-circuit voltage (Voc) than cells with thicker films, thereby reducing Auger recombination and increasing the conversion efficiency [5,6]. However, ultra-thin c-Si solar cells have a low absorption coefficient and, therefore, have a low short-circuit current density (Jsc). Typically, the conversion efficiency of ultra-thin c-Si solar cells is limited by the trade-off between Voc and Jsc. Light management techniques are required to achieve a high Jsc [7,8,9,10,11], while maintaining a high Voc.
Silicon nanowire (SiNW) arrays have garnered considerable research interest as light-trapping structures because of their strong light-confinement effect [12,13,14]. Accordingly, a SiNW array structure can increase the absorption of a thin absorber layer. Several methods have been proposed for developing SiNW arrays, including laser ablation [15,16], thermal evaporation [17], chemical vapour deposition [18,19], reactive-ion etching [20,21], and metal-assisted chemical etching (MAE) [22,23,24,25]. Among these methods, MAE is widely used because it is simple and cost-effective. In the MAE process, silver (Ag) particles are used as a catalyst to develop large-area aligned SiNW arrays on Si-wafer substrates [26,27].
The application of nanowires to solar cells has been attempted in several device configurations and materials systems. In particular, the SiNWs demonstrate effective light-trapping performance and can be used in photonic crystals that require precise design. Kayes et al., reported numerous simulations, showing that a radial-type SiNW solar cell has potentially greater conversion efficiency than a flat solar cell with the same film thickness [28]. However, the conventional SiNW arrays are generally fabricated on Si-wafer substrates. When researchers deposited SiNWs onto the active layer of a SiNW solar cell, they failed to determine whether the photocurrent originated from the SiNWs or the Si wafer [19,21,23]. Therefore, the literature contains no reports of a solar cell structures fabricated only with single-crystalline SiNWs. Because a self-standing SiNW cannot be fabricated, constructing SiNW solar cells, that have been separated from Si-wafer substrates, is difficult. Thus, SiNW arrays have been used as anti-reflection coatings in c-Si solar cells. To develop SiNWs as an active layer for solar cells, new structure and new processes are required.
Herein, the SiNW solar cell structure was fabricated on a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate to reduce the effect of bulk c-Si. This facile fabrication process employs electroless Ag plating in conjunction with MAE. For the remaining thin silicon layer, the SiNW length must be controlled to function as a carrier underneath. Herein, the effects of silver nitrate (AgNO3) concentration in the solution, that were used in the electroless Ag plating process on the SiNW density and diameter, were investigated. The effects of the etching time of the MAE on the SiNW length, using standard p-type c-Si wafer substrates, were determined, and the morphology and optical properties of the resulting arrays were evaluated. After the SiNW fabrication process was optimised, a solar cell structure was fabricated by depositing an n-type H-doped amorphous Si (a-Si:H) layer onto a p-type SiNW array absorber layer, formed via MAE on the SOI substrate. Table 1 summarizes the SiNW characteristic and its structure in the solar cell between the reported literatures and this study. The length of the SiNW on the Si wafer in this case was <1 μm [29,30]. However, when SiNW was used as the doping layer, it was 4μm long [31,32]. Herein, because a 9μm-long SiNW on an SOI substrate was used in a solar cell, the SiNW is considered an active layer material.
The photovoltaic effect of the solar cell was confirmed. However, a very low efficiency of 0.0017% was obtained because of very low Jsc and Voc values. Low Jsc was caused by the high series resistance and absorption loss from the n-type a-Si:H layer. The low Voc was caused by the high surface recombination velocity of the uncoated SiNW surfaces. These results demonstrate that reducing surface recombination is vital for improving the efficiency of SiNW-based solar cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fabrication of SiNW Arrays

SiNWs, Si wafers (p-type, [100], 2–10 Ω cm, 500 μm thickness) were dipped into a HF solution for 1 min to remove the native oxide. To cover the surface with Ag particles via electroless silver plating [31], the Si wafers were immersed in a solution of 4.8 M HF and AgNO3 for 1 min. The concentration of AgNO3 in the solution was varied as follows: 0.0025 M, 0.005 M, 0.01 M, 0.015 M, and 0.02 M. To optimise the lengths of the SiNWs, the Si wafers were chemically etched using 4.8 M HF and 0.15 M H2O2, at room temperature for an etching time of 1–60 min. The etched wafers were subsequently placed in an HNO3 solution to remove Ag particles. Finally, the oxide layer on the fabricated SiNW array was removed by immersing it in an HF solution. However, the surface pores were observed around the SiNWs. To remove the surface pores, the HNO3 treatment and HF treatment were conducted three times. The morphology of the prepared SiNW arrays was characterised using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) (JEOL JSM-7001F). The reflectance of the SiNW on the Si wafer was measured using ultraviolet-visible-near-infrared (UV-Vis-NIR) spectrophotometry (Shimadzu Co., Ltd., SolidSpec-3700). The absorption coefficient of the n-type a-Si layer was measured via spectroscopic ellipsometry (J.A. Woolam, M-2000).

2.2. Solar Cell Fabrication

Fabrication procedure of the solar cell structure are in the Figure 1A,B schematises the fabricated solar cell structure. The SOI substrate included a 10 μm-thick c-Si layer (p-type, [100], 2–10 Ω cm) on an oxide insulator layer. The SiNW array structure was etched according to the optimised procedure to provide an array length of 9 μm. To create a p-n junction, a thick n-type a-Si:H layer was deposited onto the p-type SiNW array structure, using radio-frequency (RF) plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition. A mixture of 20 sccm SiH4 and 30 sccm PH3 was used as the precursor material at 300 °C for 30 min. Subsequently, an 80nm-thick indium tin oxide (ITO) layer, with an area of 0.25 mm2, was deposited at the centre of the device via RF sputtering at 100 °C for 10 min. The area outside the 0.25 mm2 ITO layer was then etched via reactive-ion etching using CF4 gas to remove the n-type a-Si:H and SiNW array structures. Finally, a grid Al electrode was evaporated onto the ITO layer surface. The solar cells were characterised by I–V measurements under air mass (AM) 1.5G simulated solar illumination at 100 mW/cm2 and 25 °C and by quantum efficiency measurements (Bunkoukeiki, CEP-25BX).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Evaluation of Structure and rReflectance of SiNWs on Si Wafers

To measure the length and reflectance of the SiNWs, the SiNW arrays were fabricated on Si wafers. Figure 2 shows the SEM images of Ag particles fabricated via electroless plating from solutions with different AgNO3 concentration onto c-Si wafer substrates. When the AgNO3 concentration was 0.0025 M (Figure 2A), the Ag particles were deposited onto the Si wafer. When the AgNO3 concentration was increased to 0.005 M (Figure 2B), Ag was formed over the entire substrate, with an island structure, rather than a particle structure; large gaps were observed between the Ag islands. When 0.0025 M and 0.005 M AgNO3 (Figure 2C,D) were used, Ag particles formed with non-uniform size and shape, and with large gaps among them. When 0.01 M AgNO3 was used (Figure 2E), Ag nano-particles were formed along with Ag islands. For AgNO3 concentrations >0.02 M, many dendrites formed, precluding the control of the density of Ag particles, as shown in Figure 2E.
Figure 3 shows the top-view SEM images of the SiNW arrays, fabricated with different AgNO3 concentrations. When AgNO3 concentrations of 0.0025 M and 0.005 M were used (Figure 3A,B), Si nano-walls were formed, rather than a SiNW structure. These nano-wall formations strongly resembled the gaps among the Ag particles observed in Figure 2A,B, indicating that the density of Ag particles had likely increased. Accordingly, when the AgNO3 concentration was 0.01M, a SiNW structure emerged, and Si nano-walls were divided into several nanowires (Figure 3C).
The images in Figure 3C–E indicate, that Ag particles were deposited in the gaps between the Ag islands, with increasing AgNO3 concentration because higher AgNO3 concentrations led to the involvement of Ag+ ions in dendrite growth. Figure 4A–C shows cross-sectional SEM images of SiNW arrays formed with AgNO3 concentrations of 0.0025 M, 0.005 M, and 0.01 M. These images indicate, that the SiNW arrays were fabricated vertical to the substrate, and that the concentration of AgNO3 affected only the horizontal structure of the SiNW arrays. Therefore, we selected an AgNO3 concentration of 0.01 M to form SiNW arrays.
The SiNW array length increased with increasing etching time, and a 12 μm-long SiNW array was obtained after 60 min. However, the length of the SiNW array did not linearly increase with respect to the etching time. The SiNW formation mechanism can be interpreted according to the following electrochemical reactions of Si in an HF and H2O2 solution:
4 Ag + + Si 6 F 4 Ag + SiF 6 2 ,
2 Ag + H 2 O 2 + 2 H + 2 Ag + + 2 H 2 O .
After the consumption of HF and H2O2, new HF and H2O2 must diffuse to the bottom of the forming SiNWs. However, the length of etchant migration increases with increasing etching time because the lengths of the SiNWs increase. Hence, the SiNW length depended on the diffusion of the etching solution. Since the MAE reaction is complicated, a slight difference in wire length may occur depending on the experimental environment. These results reveal that the SiNW array length can be reasonably controlled by varying the etching time. However, to obtain a SiNW of arbitrary length, each laboratory should conduct its own preliminary experiments.
To confirm the light-confinement effect of SiNWs, the reflectance of SiNW arrays of different lengths was measured, as shown in Figure 5B. Compared with the reflectance of a bare Si wafer, the optical reflectance of all of the SiNW arrays, for wavelengths <1000 nm, was reduced because of a decrease in the effective refractive index of the SiNW layer and light scattering of the SiNWs. With shorter SiNWs (0.12–7.5 μm), the reflectance decreased to 5–25% compared with 35% for the bare Si wafer in the wavelength range from 600 nm to 1000 nm. Additionally, when the lengths of SiNWs were less than the wavelength of light, the refractive index of the SiNW array could be considered as a middle refractive index layer between the Si and air. Therefore, the reflectance was reduced because the effective refractive index of the SiNW layer decreased. However, the optical reflectance from SiNWs longer than 1.4 μm decreased drastically. In particular, for 7.5 μm-long SiNWs, the optical reflectance below 1000 nm decreased to less than 1%. These results indicate that the SiNW array structures exhibit antireflection rather than light-confinement effects.

3.2. Properties of Solar Cells with the SiNW Array Structure on an SOI Substrate

The SiNW over 7.5 μm length can achieve strong light confinement. To reduce the influence of the silicon layer as much as possible, 9 μm-long SiNW array structure was adopted in the solar cell. Figure 6A shows the dark and illuminated I–V characteristics of the solar cell with an optimum SiNW absorber layer fabricated on an SOI substrate. A Voc of 110 mV was obtained, indicating that the fabricated solar cell provided a photovoltaic effect. However, the conversion efficiency of the solar cell was extremely low (0.00017%). Therefore, the solar cell parameters were analysed to determine the cause of low efficiency.
A low Jsc of 6.2 μA/cm2 was obtained because of the high series resistance of the device layer, whose sheet resistance was 5 kΩ/sq. Figure 6B presents a cross-sectional SEM image of the SiNW array structure after deposition of the n-type a-Si:H layer. Herein, a very thick n-type a-Si:H layer was deposited onto the SiNW array structure surface to ensure that a connection formed between each p-type SiNW and n-type layer. In a high-efficiency heterojunction Si solar cell, the thickness of a-Si is on the order of tens of nanometres. Therefore, the very thick a-Si leads to a solar cell, with high resistivity. Moreover, reaming the Si layer under the SiNW arrays contributes substantially to the high resistivity. To improve the Isc, we must consider a new structure.
Figure 6C shows the quantum efficiency (QE) of the solar cell under a negative applied bias voltage with respect to the optical wavelength. The QE of the device is extremely low in the short-wavelength region (300–700 nm). Figure 6D shows the absorption coefficient of n-type a-Si:H. The band gap of n-Si:H is 1.7 eV. The optical absorption coefficient of n-type a-Si is high, and the thickness of the n-a-Si layer is approximately 300 nm. Therefore, light with wavelengths shorter than 720 nm was absorbed by the n-a-Si. Because n-type a-Si has a high carrier concentration and high defect density, it did not contribute to power generation. To improve the QE in the short-wavelength region, the thickness of the n-a-Si:H layer should be reduced. Although p-SiNW can absorb light longer than 720 nm, because of sheet resistance, the QE is very low in the absence of a negative bias voltage. Additionally, the QE at each wavelength increased with increasing negative bias voltage. The n-type a-Si:H layer was deposited only on the top of the SiNW array structure because of the high density of SiNWs (Figure 3C); this configuration strongly limited the concentrations of the n-type layer precursors at the bottom of the SiNWs. Moreover, a 467 nm-wide depletion region, as indicated by the difference between the donor and acceptor concentrations (Na (p-type SiNW) = 5×1015 cm−3, Nd (n-type-a-Si) = 1×1019 cm−3), formed around the surfaces of SiNWs between the n-type a-Si:H and the SiNW array structure. The negative bias enhanced the width of the depletion region and the electric fields, thereby increased the carrier collection, even though the uncoated SiNWs have a high surface recombination velocity. These results reveal that reducing the surface recombination is vital for improving the efficiency of solar cells, fabricated using SiNW array structures as the absorber layer. Our previously reported results indicated that Al2O3 fabricated by atomic-layer deposition is a good passivation material for a SiNW array [30]. If SiNW with Al2O3 is used in a solar cell, the Voc can be improved. However, the insulating Al2O3 film prevents the carriers from migrating to the external circuit. Thus, the inclusion of a passivation film without the SOI substrate is necessary to improve the efficiency of the device.

4. Conclusions

SiNW array structures were fabricated on p-type c-Si wafer substrates, using electroless Ag plating from solutions with various AgNO3 concentrations and MAE, over different etching times. With increasing AgNO3 concentration, the resulting Si nano-structures changed from the nano-walls to SiNWs, with decreasing average diameters. The length of the SiNWs depended on the diffusion of the etching solution, such that the length of the SiNWs could be reasonably controlled by adjusting the etching time. The reflectance of the SiNW array structures decreased with increasing SiNW length, indicating that the SiNW array structures with SiNW lengths >7.5 μm exhibited an anti-reflection effect and could be expected to realise solar cells, with a high Jsc, while maintaining a high Voc. Using the optimum etching process, we fabricated a solar cell, using an absorber layer composed of a SiNW array structure with a SiNW length of 9 μm etched within a 10 μm-thick p-type c-Si layer on an insulator substrate. A hetero-junction solar cell structure was fabricated by depositing an n-type a-Si:H layer onto the SiNW array surface. The photovoltaic effect of the solar cell was confirmed. However, a low efficiency of 0.0017% was obtained because of the low Jsc and Voc values. The low Jsc was caused by the high series resistance and by the absorption loss from the n-type a-Si:H layer. Additionally, the low Voc was caused by a high surface recombination velocity of the uncoated SiNW surfaces. These results demonstrate that reducing the surface recombination is vital for improving the efficiency of solar cells with SiNW array structures as the absorber. Thus, the inclusion of a passivation film, without the SOI substrate from the structure, is necessary to improve the efficiency of the device.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation: S.K. and Y.K.; methodology: S.K.; validation S.K.; formal analysis: S.K and Y.K.; investigation: S.K.; data curation: S.K.; writing-original draft preparation: S.K.; writing-review and editing Y.K, K.G, and T.S.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yoshikawa, K.; Kawasaki, H.; Yoshida, W.; Irie, T.; Konishi, K.; Nakano, K.; Uto, T.; Adachi, D.; Kanmatsu, M.; Uzu, H.; et al. Silicon heterojunction solar cell with interdigitated back contacts for a photoconversion efficiency over 26%. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Masuko, K.; Shigematsu, M.; Hashiguchi, T.; Fujishima, D.; Kai, M.; Yoshimura, N.; Yamaguchi, T.; Ichihashi, Y.; Mishrima, T.; Matsubara, N.; et al. Achievement of More Than 25% Conversion Efficiency with Crystalline Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cell. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2014, 4, 1433–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Haase, F.; Hollemann, C.; Schafer, S.; Merkle, A.; Rienacker, M.; Krugener, J.; Brendel, R.; Peibst, R. Laser contact openings for local poly-Si-metal contacts enabling 26.1%-efficient POLO-IBC solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2018, 186, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Benick, J.; Richter, A.; Muller, R.; Hauser, H.; Feldmann, F.; Krenckel, P.; Riepe, S.; Schindler, F.; Schubert, C.M.; Hermle, M.; et al. High-Efficiency n-Type HP mc Silicon Solar Cells. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2017, 7, 1171–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Green, M.A. Lifits on the Open-Circut Voltage and Efficiency of Silicon Solar-Cells Imposed by Intrinsic Aurge Processes. IEEE. Electron. Dev. 1984, 31, 671–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Swanson, R.M. Approaching the 29% limit efficiency of silicon solar cells. In Proceedings of the Conference Record of the Thirty-First IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA, 3–7 January 2005; pp. 889–894. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sai, H.; Kanamori, Y.; Arafune, K.; Ohshita, Y.; Yamaguchi, M. Light trapping effect of submicron surface textures in crystalline Si solar cells. Prog. Photovolt. 2007, 15, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, J.H.; Wang, A.H.; Green, M.A.; Ferrazza, F. 19.8% efficient “honeycomb” textured multicrystalline and 24.4% monocrystalline silicon solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1998, 73, 1991–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mavrokefalos, A.; Han, S.E.; Yerci, S.; Branham, M.S.; Chen, G. Efficient Light Trapping in Inverted Nanopyramid Thin Crystalline Silicon Membranes for Solar Cell Applications. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 2792–2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Green, M.A. Lambertian light trapping in textured solar cells and light-emitting diodes: Analytical solutions. Prog. Photovolt. 2002, 10, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Macdonald, D.H.; Cuevas, A.; Kerr, M.J.; Samundsett, C.; Ruby, D.; Winderbaum, S.; Leo, A. Texturing industrial multicrystalline silicon solar cells. Sol. Energy 2004, 76, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kato, S.; Kurokawa, Y.; Watanabe, Y.; Yamada, Y.; Yamada, A.; Ohta, Y.; Niwa, Y.; Hirota, M. Optical assessment of silicon nanowire arrays fabricated by metal-assisted chemical etching. Nanoscale Res. 2013, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kurokawa, Y.; Nezasa, R.; Kato, S.; Miyazaki, H.; Takahashi, I.; Usami, N. Fabrication of silicon nanowire based solar cells using TiO2/Al2O3 stack thin films. Mrs Adv. 2018, 3, 1419–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ishikawa, R.; Kato, S.; Yamazaki, T.; Kurokawa, Y.; Miyajima, S.; Konagai, M. Solid-phase crystallization of amorphous silicon nanowire array and optical properties. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cui, Y.; Duan, X.F.; Hu, J.T.; Lieber, C.M. Doping and electrical transport in silicon nanowires. J. Phys. Chem. 2000, 104, 5213–5216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Y.F.; Tang, Y.H.; Wang, N.; Yu, D.P.; Lee, C.S.; Bello, I.; Lee, S.T. Silicon nanowires prepared by laser ablation at high temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1998, 72, 1835–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pan, H.; Lim, S.; Poh, C.; Sun, H.; Wu, X.; Feng, Y.; Lin, J. Growth of Si nanowires by thermal evaporation. Nanotechnology 2005, 16, 417–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hannon, J.B.; Kodambaka, S.; Ross, F.M.; Tromp, R.M. The influence of the surface migration of gold on the growth of silicon nanowires. Nature 2006, 440, 69–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gunawan, O.; Guha, S. Characteristics of vapor-liquid-solid grown silicon nanowire solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2009, 93, 1388–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, Z.P.; Fang, H.; Zhu, J. Fabrication of silicon nanowire arrays with controlled diameter, length, and density. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 744–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Garnett, E.; Yang, P.D. Light Trapping in Silicon Nanowire Solar Cells. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1082–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Peng, K.Q.; Yan, Y.J.; Gao, S.P.; Zhu, J. Synthesis of large-area silicon nanowire arrays via self-assembling nanoelectrochemistry. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 1164–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jung, J.Y.; Guo, Z.; Jee, S.W.; Um, H.D.; Park, K.T.; Lee, J.H. A strong antireflective solar cell prepared by tapering silicon nanowires. Opt. Express 2010, 18, A286–A292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chern, W.; Hsu, K.; Chun, I.S.; de Azeredo, B.P.; Ahmed, N.; Kim, K.H. Nonlithographic Patterning and Metal-Assisted Chemical Etching for Manufacturing of Tunable Light-Emitting Silicon Nanowire Arrays. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1582–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Peng, K.Q.; Zhang, M.L.; Lu, A.J.; Wong, N.B.; Zhang, R.Q.; Lee, S.T. Ordered silicon nanowire arrays via nanosphere lithography and metal-induced etching. App. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kato, S.; Watanabe, Y.; Kurokawa, Y.; Yamada, A.; Ohta, Y.; Niwa, Y.; Hirota, M. Metal-Assisted Chemical Etching Using Silica Nanoparticle for the Fabrication of a Silicon Nanowire Array. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, M.L.; Peng, K.Q.; Fan, X.; Jie, J.S.; Zhang, R.Q.; Lee, S.T.; Wong, N.B. Preparation of large-area uniform silicon nanowires arrays through metal-assisted chemical etching. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 4444–4450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kayes, B.M.; Atwater, H.A.; Lewis, N.S. Comparison of the device physics principles of planar and radial p-n junction nanorod solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shen, X.J.; Sun, B.Q.; Liu, D.; Lee, S.T. Hybrid Heterojunction Solar Cell Based on Organic-Inorganic Silicon Nanowire Array Architecture. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 19408–19415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yu, P.C.; Tsai, C.Y.; Chang, J.K.; Lai, C.C.; Chen, P.H.; Lai, Y.C.; Tsai, P.T.; Li, M.C.; Pan, H.Z.; Huang, Y.Y.; et al. 13% Efficiency Hybrid Organic/Silicon-Nanowire Heterojunction Solar Cell via Interface Engineering. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 10780–10787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zeng, L.S.; Yu, X.G.; Han, Y.G.; Yang, D.R. Performance of Silicon Nanowire Solar Cells with Phosphorus-Diffused Emitters. J. Nanomater. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kumar, D.; Srivastava, S.K.; Singh, P.K.; Husain, M.; Kumar, V. Fabrication of silicon nanowire arrays based solar cell with improved performance. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2011, 95, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) Fabrication process for silicon nanowire (SiNW)-array-based solar cell on an silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate (B) Schematic of a SiNW-array-based solar cell etched on the SOI substrate.
Figure 1. (A) Fabrication process for silicon nanowire (SiNW)-array-based solar cell on an silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate (B) Schematic of a SiNW-array-based solar cell etched on the SOI substrate.
Applsci 09 00818 g001aApplsci 09 00818 g001b
Figure 2. SEM images of Ag particles fabricated via electroless plating onto p-type c-Si wafers with AgNO3 concentrations of (A) 0.0025 M, (B) 0.005 M, (C) 0.01 M, (D) 0.015 M and (E) 0.02 M.
Figure 2. SEM images of Ag particles fabricated via electroless plating onto p-type c-Si wafers with AgNO3 concentrations of (A) 0.0025 M, (B) 0.005 M, (C) 0.01 M, (D) 0.015 M and (E) 0.02 M.
Applsci 09 00818 g002
Figure 3. Top-view SEM images of etched samples fabricated using electroless plating with AgNO3 concentrations of (A) 0.0025 M, (B) 0.005 M, (C) 0.01 M, (D) 0.01 M, and (E) 0.02 M.
Figure 3. Top-view SEM images of etched samples fabricated using electroless plating with AgNO3 concentrations of (A) 0.0025 M, (B) 0.005 M, (C) 0.01 M, (D) 0.01 M, and (E) 0.02 M.
Applsci 09 00818 g003
Figure 4. Cross-sectional SEM images of SiNWs fabricated via metal-assisted chemical etching with different concentrations of AgNO3: (A) 0.01 M, (B) 0.015 M, and (C) 0.02 M.
Figure 4. Cross-sectional SEM images of SiNWs fabricated via metal-assisted chemical etching with different concentrations of AgNO3: (A) 0.01 M, (B) 0.015 M, and (C) 0.02 M.
Applsci 09 00818 g004
Figure 5. (A) Dependence of the SiNW array length on etching time. (B) Reflectance of the SiNW arrays with different array lengths.
Figure 5. (A) Dependence of the SiNW array length on etching time. (B) Reflectance of the SiNW arrays with different array lengths.
Applsci 09 00818 g005
Figure 6. (A) I–V characteristics of the solar cell with an optimum SiNW absorber layer fabricated on an SOI substrate. (B) Cross-sectional SEM image of the SiNW array surface after the application of the n-type a-Si:H layer. (C) Quantum efficiency (QE) of the solar cell under a changing negative voltage from 0–1.5 V. (D) Absorption coefficient of n-type a-Si measured via spectroscopic ellipsometry.
Figure 6. (A) I–V characteristics of the solar cell with an optimum SiNW absorber layer fabricated on an SOI substrate. (B) Cross-sectional SEM image of the SiNW array surface after the application of the n-type a-Si:H layer. (C) Quantum efficiency (QE) of the solar cell under a changing negative voltage from 0–1.5 V. (D) Absorption coefficient of n-type a-Si measured via spectroscopic ellipsometry.
Applsci 09 00818 g006
Table 1. The silicon nanowire (SiNW) characteristic and its structure in solar cell between the reported literatures and this study.
Table 1. The silicon nanowire (SiNW) characteristic and its structure in solar cell between the reported literatures and this study.
ReferenceLength of SiNWPurposeDoping Concentration of SiNWpn-Junction TypeSubstrate
This study9 μmAbsorption layer1015–1016 cm−3Heterojunction
(SiNW/a-Si)
SOI substrate
(SiNW:9 μm
Si layer:1 μm)
Ref [29,30]<1 μmAnti-reflection1015–1016 cm−3Heterojunction
(organic/SiNW)
Si wafer
Ref [31,32]<4 μmAnti-reflection>1019 cm−3Homo-junctionSi wafer

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kato, S.; Kurokawa, Y.; Gotoh, K.; Soga, T. Fabrication of a Silicon Nanowire Solar Cell on a Silicon-on-Insulator Substrate. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9050818

AMA Style

Kato S, Kurokawa Y, Gotoh K, Soga T. Fabrication of a Silicon Nanowire Solar Cell on a Silicon-on-Insulator Substrate. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(5):818. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9050818

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kato, Shinya, Yasuyoshi Kurokawa, Kazuhiro Gotoh, and Tetsuo Soga. 2019. "Fabrication of a Silicon Nanowire Solar Cell on a Silicon-on-Insulator Substrate" Applied Sciences 9, no. 5: 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9050818

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop