Next Article in Journal
Application of Bayesian Neural Network (BNN) for the Prediction of Blast-Induced Ground Vibration
Next Article in Special Issue
An Experimental Study on the Injection Characteristics and the Macroscopic Spray Characteristics of Rapeseed Oil-Diesel Fuel Blends
Previous Article in Journal
Unmanned Surface Vehicle Using a Leader–Follower Swarm Control Algorithm
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Evaluation of the Influence of the Diameter of the Outlet Nozzle Bore of a Gas Injector on Its Flow Characteristic
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Combustion Systems and Fuels Used in Engines—A Short Review

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, 45C Wiejska Str., 15-351 Bialystok, Poland
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(5), 3126; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053126
Submission received: 22 February 2023 / Accepted: 27 February 2023 / Published: 28 February 2023
In the coming years, strong measures are planned to reduce emissions from various transportation modes. CO2 emissions per km are expected to reach 0 g by 2035 [1]. In the short term, i.e., by 2030, the reduction in CO2 emissions from passenger vehicles is expected to reach 55% (43 g·km−1). In this case, the vehicle should be equipped with EV propulsion or have ICE supplemented with 50% PHEV or FCV propulsion. During homologation, vehicles are subjected to laboratory (NEDC, WLTC) [2,3] and road (RDE) tests [4]. The imminent introduction of the Euro VII requirements in Europe [5] will pose new challenges for vehicle propulsion sources. It is clear that in the course of daily vehicle operation, emissions can be reduced through eco-driving [6]. Current restrictions focus on passenger vehicles and commercial vehicles. Despite the non-optimistic scenario regarding the possibility of the further use of ICE for various means of transportation, there is still hope for their use in heavy and long-distance transportation or work machinery [7].
Adapting the ICE to the subsequent emission requirements entails the modification of the combustion mixture formation process, port/direct injection [8], combined combustion with main and pre-chambers [9,10,11,12], downsizing [13], the retrofitting of after-treatment systems with EC, DOC, FAP, DPF, GPF and SCR [14,15,16,17] and many other design and functional features, such as injectors [18,19]. Modifications to the organization of the combustion process are especially significant. Here, in addition to the standard methods, one can distinguish ATAC [20], CAI/HCCI [21,22], HPDI or RCCI [23].
Reductions in CO2 emissions can be achieved by using fuels with a lower carbon content than standard fuels [24]. The most commonly used alternative fuels in ICE are LPG [25,26,27,28], CNG [29,30,31] and LNG [26,32,33]. There is also growing interest in H2 [34,35,36]. HVO is being introduced with positive results [37,38], and many lead modern engines are already prepared to run on this fuel. Research is also being conducted on the use of PVO, especially in agricultural machinery [39]. By using additives with PVO, it is possible to obtain FAME [40], which is more resistant to freezing. In agricultural applications and stationary power generators, biogas has a positive effect [41]. Current trends in research on the use of alternative fuels in transportation focus on fuels that are produced not only directly from plants but also from waste. These are mainly syngas [34], GTL [42], biomass-gasifier [43], POMDME [44] and TPO [45] or NH3 [46]. OME e-fuels [47] and fuel cells [48] are considered the greenest. In parallel with experimental studies, computer simulations are being carried out that account for the formation of the combustible mixture and the combustion process itself with regard to alternative fuels. In this case, it is necessary to determine the characteristic parameters and physical and chemical properties of the fuels or their mixtures [49]. In cognitive terms and as an application in modeling the movement of a vehicle, it is very important to know the full load engine characteristic powered by any fuel. The determination of coefficients describing such characteristics enables their reproduction under modeling conditions [50]. The procedures described in [51] can be used to determine the full load engine characteristics.
Alternative fuels, like any fuels ultimately intended for use in transportation, must meet the requirements outlined in the CAFÉ General Regulations, AMFA [52]. Any action in this regard will, in any case, be determined by CO2 emissions (CARB-CAR) [53].

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations and Acronyms

The following abbreviations and acronyms are used in this manuscript. AMFA—Alternative Motor Fuels Act; ATAC—Active Thermo-Atmosphere Combustion; CAFÉ—Corporate Average Fuel Economy; CAI—Controlled Auto-Ignition; CARB-CAR—California Air Resources Board and validated by the Climate Action Reserve; CNG—Compressed Natural Gas; CO2—Carbon Dioxide; DPF—Diesel Particulate Filter; EC—Exhaust Catalyst; EURO 7—European Vehicle Emissions Standards; EV—Electric Vehicle; FAME—Fatty Acid Methyl Ester; FAP—Filter a Particular; FCV—Fuel Cell Electric Hybrid Vehicle; GHGs—Greenhouse Gases; GPF—Gasoline Particulate Filter; GTL—Gas to Liquid; H2—Hydrogen; HVO—Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil; HCCI—Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition; ICE—Internal Combustion Engine; LNG—Liquefied Natural Gas; LPG—Liquefied Petroleum Gas; NEDC—New European Driving Cycle; NH3—Ammonia; OME—Oxymethylene Ether; PHEV—Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle; POMDME—Polyoxymethylene Dimethyl Ether; PVO—Pure Vegetable Oil; RCCI—Reactivity-Controlled Compression Ignition; RDE—Real Driving Emissions test; SCR—Selective Catalytic Reduction; TPO—Tire Pyrolytic Oil; WLTC—Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Cycle.

References

  1. European Commission. CO2 Emission Performance Standards for Cars and Vans; European Commission, Climate Action. Available online: https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/transport-emissions/road-transport-reducing-co2-emissions-vehicles/co2-emission-performance-standards-cars-and-vans_en (accessed on 20 February 2023).
  2. Bielaczyc, P.; Woodburn, J. Trends in Automotive Emission Legislation: Impact on LD Engine Development, Fuels, Lubricants and Test Methods: A Global View, with a Focus on WLTP and RDE Regulations. Emiss. Control Sci. Technol. 2019, 5, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Czaban, J.; Szpica, D. Drive test system to be used on roller dynamometer. Mechanika 2013, 19, 600–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Varella, R.A.; Duarte, G.; Baptista, P.; Sousa, L.; Mendoza Villafuerte, P. Comparison of Data Analysis Methods for European Real Driving Emissions Regulation; SAE Techical Paper: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2017; p. 2017-01-0997L. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. García, A.; Monsalve-Serrano, J.; Villalta, D.; Guzmán-Mendoza, M. Methanol and OMEx as fuel candidates to fulfill the potential EURO VII emissions regulation under dual-mode dual-fuel combustion. Fuel 2020, 287, 119548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Caban, J.; Vrábel, J.; Šarkan, B.; Ignaciuk, P. About eco-driving, genesis, challenges and benefits, application possibilities. Transp. Res. Procedia 2019, 40, 1281–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Waluś, K.J.; Warguła, Ł.; Krawiec, P.; Adamiec, J.M. Legal regulations of restrictions of air pollution made by non-road mobile machinery—The case study for Europe: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 3243–3259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Shuai, S.; Ma, X.; Li, Y.; Qi, Y.; Xu, H. Recent Progress in Automotive Gasoline Direct Injection Engine Technology. Automot. Innov. 2018, 1, 95–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bunce, M.; Blaxill, H.; Kulatilaka, W.; Jiang, N. The Effects of Turbulent Jet Characteristics On Engine Performance Using a Pre-Chamber Combustor; SAE Technical Paper: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2014; p. 2014-01-1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Attard, W.P.; Fraser, N.; Parsons, P.; Toulson, E. A Turbulent Jet Ignition Pre-Chamber Combustion System for Large Fuel Economy Improvements in a Modern Vehicle Powertrain. SAE Int. J. Engines 2010, 3, 20–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Shin, J.; Choi, J.; Seo, J.; Park, S. Pre-chamber combustion system for heavy-duty engines for operating dual fuel and diesel modes. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 255, 115365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Alvarez, C.E.C.; Couto, G.E.; Roso, V.R.; Thiriet, A.B.; Valle, R.M. A review of prechamber ignition systems as lean combustion technology for SI engines. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2018, 128, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Leduc, P.; Dubar, B.; Ranini, A.; Monnier, G. Downsizing of gasoline engine: An efficient way to reduce CO2 emissions. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 2003, 58, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, J.; Roth, P.; Durbin, T.D.; Johnson, K.C.; Cocker, D.R.; Asa-Awuku, A.; Brezny, R.; Geller, M.; Karavalakis, G. Gasoline Particulate Filters as an Effective Tool to Reduce Particulate and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Emissions from Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) Vehicles: A Case Study with Two GDI Vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 3275–3284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ballinger, T.; Cox, J.; Konduru, M.; De, D.; Manning, W.; Andersen, P. Evaluation of SCR Catalyst Technology on Diesel Particulate Filters. SAE Int. J. of Fuels Lubr. 2009, 2, 369–374. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/26273395. [CrossRef]
  16. Senthil Kumar, J.; Ramesh Bapu, B.R.; Sivasaravanan, S.; Prabhu, M.; Muthu Kumar, S.; Abubacker, M.A. Experimental studies on emission reduction in a DI diesel engine by using a nano catalyst coated catalytic converter. Int. J. Ambient Energy 2019, 43, 1241–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Resitoglu, I.A.; Altinisik, K.; Keskin, A.; Ocakoglu, K. The effects of Fe2O3 based DOC and SCR catalyst on the exhaust emissions of diesel engines. Fuel 2020, 262, 116501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mieczkowski, G.; Szpica, D.; Borawski, A.; Diliunas, S.; Pilkaite, T.; Leisis, V. Application of smart materials in the actuation system of a gas injector. Materials 2021, 14, 6984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Szpica, D.; Mieczkowski, G.; Borawski, A.; Leisis, V.; Diliunas, S.; Pilkaite, T. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of the pressure sensor used in pulse-operated low-pressure gas-phase solenoid valve measurements. Sensors 2021, 21, 8287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Onishi, S.; Jo, S.H.; Shoda, K.; Jo, P.D.; Kato, S. Active Thermo-Atmosphere Combustion (ATAC)—A New Combustion Process for Internal Combustion Engines; SAE Technical Paper: Warrendale, PA, USA, 1979; p. 790501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Koszalka, G.; Hunicz, J. Comparative study of energy losses related to the ring pack operation in homogeneous charge compression ignition and spark ignition combustion. Energy 2021, 235, 121388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jeuland, N.; Montagne, X.; Duret, P. New HCCI/CAI combustion process development: Methodology for determination of relevant fuel parameters. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 2004, 59, 571–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mikulski, M.; Bekdemir, C. Understanding the role of low reactivity fuel stratification in a dual fuel RCCI engine—A simulation study. Appl. Energy 2017, 191, 689–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hunicz, J.; Kordos, P. An experimental study of fuel injection strategies in CAI gasoline engine. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2011, 35, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Raslavičius, L.; Keršys, A.; Mockus, S.; Keršiene, N.; Starevičius, M. Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) as a medium-term option in the transition to sustainable fuels and transport. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 32, 513–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. MacLean, H.L.; Lave, L.B. Evaluating automobile fuel/propulsion system technologies. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2003, 29, 1–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Johnson, E. LPG: A secure, cleaner transport fuel? A policy recommendation for Europe. Energy Policy 2003, 31, 1573–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Masi, M. Experimental analysis on a spark ignition petrol engine fuelled with LPG (liquefied petroleum gas). Energy 2012, 41, 252–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Frick, M.; Axhausen, K.W.; Carle, G.; Wokaun, A. Optimization of the distribution of compressed natural gas (CNG) refueling stations: Swiss case studies. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2007, 12, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hekkert, M.P.; Hendriks, F.H.J.F.; Faaij, A.P.C.; Neelis, M.L. Natural gas as an alternative to crude oil in automotive fuel chains well-to-wheel analysis and transition strategy development. Energy Policy 2005, 33, 579–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Aslam, M.U.; Masjuki, H.H.; Kalam, M.A.; Abdesselam, H.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Amalina, M.A. An experimental investigation of CNG as an alternative fuel for a retrofitted gasoline vehicle. Fuel 2006, 85, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Arteconi, A.; Brandoni, C.; Evangelista, D.; Polonara, F. Life-cycle greenhouse gas analysis of LNG as a heavy vehicle fuel in Europe. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 2005–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kumar, S.; Kwon, H.-T.; Choi, K.-H.; Lim, W.; Cho, J.H.; Tak, K.; Moon, I. LNG: An eco-friendly cryogenic fuel for sustainable development. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 4264–4273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fiore, M.; Magi, V.; Viggiano, A. Internal combustion engines powered by syngas: A review. Appl. Energy 2020, 276, 115415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jemni, M.A.; Kassem, S.H.; Driss, Z.; Abid, M.S. Effects of hydrogen enrichment and injection location on in-cylinder flow characteristics, performance and emissions of gaseous LPG engine. Energy 2018, 150, 92–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Popa, M.E.; Segers, A.J.; Denier van der Gon, H.A.C.; Krol, M.C.; Visschedijk, A.J.H.; Schaap, M.; Röckmann, T. Impact of a future H2 transportation on atmospheric pollution in Europe. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 113, 208–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Oliva, F.; Fernández-Rodríguez, D. Autoignition study of LPG blends with diesel and HVO in a constant-volume combustion chamber. Fuel 2020, 267, 117173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Parravicini, M.; Barro, C.; Boulouchos, K. Experimental characterization of GTL, HVO, and OME based alternative fuels for diesel engines. Fuel 2021, 292, 120177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chiaramonti, D.; Prussi, M. Pure vegetable oil for energy and transport. Int. J. Oil Gas Coal Technol. 2009, 2, 186–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Haryono, I.; Ma’ruf, M.; Setiapraja, H. Investigation on used oil and engine components of vehicles road test using twenty percent Fatty Acid Methyl Ester (B20). Int. J. Energy Environ. 2016, 7, 383–396. [Google Scholar]
  41. Singh, A.P.; Kumar, D.; Agarwal, A.K. Introduction to Alternative Fuels and Advanced Combustion Techniques as Sustainable Solutions for Internal Combustion Engines. In Energy, Environment, and Sustainability; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bassiony, M.A.; Ibrahim, A.; El-Kassaby, M.M. An experimental study on the effect of using gas-to-liquid (GTL) fuel on diesel engine performance and emissions. Alexandria Eng. J. 2016, 55, 2115–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Susastriawan, A.A.P.; Purwanto, Y. Purnomo Biomass gasifier–internal combustion engine system: Review of literature. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2021, 14, 1090–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pélerin, D.; Gaukel, K.; Härtl, M.; Jacob, E.; Wachtmeister, G. Potentials to simplify the engine system using the alternative diesel fuels oxymethylene ether OME1 and OME3−6 on a heavy-duty engine. Fuel 2020, 259, 116231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mikulski, M.; Ambrosewicz-Walacik, M.; Hunicz, J.; Nitkiewicz, S. Combustion engine applications of waste tyre pyrolytic oil. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2021, 85, 100915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Boretti, A. Novel dual fuel diesel-ammonia combustion system in advanced TDI engines. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 7071–7076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Novella, R.; Bracho, G.; Gomez-Soriano, J.; Fernandes, C.S.; Lucchini, T. Combustion system optimization for the integration of e-fuels (Oxymethylene Ether) in compression ignition engines. Fuel 2021, 305, 121580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vichard, L.; Steiner, N.Y.; Zerhouni, N.; Hissel, D. Hybrid fuel cell system degradation modeling methods: A comprehensive review. J. Power Sources 2021, 506, 230071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Biswas, S.; Tanvir, S.; Wang, H.; Qiao, L. On ignition mechanisms of premixed CH4/air and H2/air using a hot turbulent jet generated by pre-chamber combustion. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 106, 925–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Szpica, D. New Leiderman–Khlystov Coefficients for Estimating Engine Full Load Characteristics and Performance. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. Engl. Ed. 2019, 32, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Szpica, D.; Piwnik, J.; Sidorowicz, M. The motion storage characteristics as the indicator of stability of internal combustion engine-receiver cooperation. Mechanika 2014, 20, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Liu, Y.; Helfand, G.E. The Alternative Motor Fuels Act, alternative-fuel vehicles, and greenhouse gas emissions. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2009, 43, 755–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Marino, B.D.V.; Mincheva, M.; Doucett, A. California air resources board forest carbon protocol invalidates offsets. PeerJ 2019, 2019, e7606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Szpica, D. Combustion Systems and Fuels Used in Engines—A Short Review. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3126. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053126

AMA Style

Szpica D. Combustion Systems and Fuels Used in Engines—A Short Review. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(5):3126. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053126

Chicago/Turabian Style

Szpica, Dariusz. 2023. "Combustion Systems and Fuels Used in Engines—A Short Review" Applied Sciences 13, no. 5: 3126. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053126

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop