Next Article in Journal
Expression Recognition of Multiple Faces Using a Convolution Neural Network Combining the Haar Cascade Classifier
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Stress Concentration Factors Obtained by Different Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Fir (Abies alba Mill.) Honeydew Honey Inhibits Growth and Adhesion of Campylobacter jejuni In Vitro
Previous Article in Special Issue
Surface Quality Evaluation in the Milling Process Using a Ball Nose End Mill
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Noble Metals on the Microstructure and Properties of Biodegradable Mg-Nd-Zr Alloy

1
Faculty of Engineering and Physics, National University Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic, 69063 Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
2
Division of Metallic Systems, Institute of Materials Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Watsonova 47, 04001 Košice, Slovakia
3
Physics Department, Pryazovskyi State Technical University, 49000 Dnipro, Ukraine
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(23), 12736; https://doi.org/10.3390/app132312736
Submission received: 1 November 2023 / Revised: 17 November 2023 / Accepted: 21 November 2023 / Published: 28 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modernly Designed Materials and Their Processing)

Abstract

:
In this work, the approach to improve the mechanical properties of a biodegradable Mg-Nd-Zr alloy through modification with noble metals (Ag and Au) was proposed. The separate and combined influence of silver and gold on the macro- and microstructure of the alloy was studied. A qualitative and quantitative assessment of the structural components of the alloy was carried out. It was shown that when modifying the melt, noble metals form the complex intermetallic phases which served as additional crystallization centers. It has been established that adding 0.05 to 0.1 wt.% of noble metals to Mg-based alloy increase the volume fraction of intermetallic compounds by ~1.5 times, shifting them towards smaller size groups with the simultaneous formation of spherical intermetallic compounds. The latter are located in the center of the grain proving them to be the additional nucleation sites. It was shown that complex modification (0.1% Ag + 0.1% Au) of a Mg-based alloy refined its structural components by ~1.5 times, increasing the strength by ~20%, and ductility by ~2 times due to the formation of the intermetallic compounds. The proposed technology for modifying cast biodegradable Mg-based alloys is feasible to be used for the manufacture of implants for osteosynthesis.

1. Introduction

Currently, various metals and alloys are widely used in orthopedics and traumatology for osteosynthesis of skeletal segments bearing increased load. Metal implants, which are mainly used today, are made from stainless steel, Co-based and Ti-based alloys [1,2,3,4].
In recent decades, many complaints have arisen regarding the materials from which fixators for the osteosynthesis of bone fragments are manufactured. The main problems associated with the use of metal implants are metal allergy, aseptic inflammation and metallosis. Also, a limitation of the use of metallic materials is the release of toxic ions or metal particles due to corrosion or wear, which leads to an inflammatory process [4,5,6,7]. In addition, the elastic moduli of these alloys differ significantly from bone tissue. As a result of the stress shielding effect, the formation of newly formed bone tissue is reduced and negative remodeling is enhanced, which leads to a degradation of the implant stability [8,9,10]. The use of bioinert metal fixators for osteosynthesis requires repeated surgery to remove the implant. As a rule, repeated surgery is no less traumatic than osteosynthesis itself. This entails an increase in the overall length of hospital treatment and temporary disability of patients. In this regard, there is a constant ongoing search for materials that could dissolve in the implantation area with synchronous replacement with bone tissue, which would not require the removal of fixing devices.
One of these materials may be magnesium, which is a natural element in the body, and its bioresorption products are characterized by high biocompatibility [11,12,13]. These properties make magnesium attractive for use in orthopedics and traumatology [14,15,16]. However, the main limitation of its use is low mechanical properties [3,17,18]. The solution to the problem is the use of Mg-based alloys, which have a higher level of mechanical properties and an elastic modulus comparable to that of bone tissue [19]. In this regard, the research and development of biodegradable Mg-based alloys is a promising direction in biomaterials engineering. The use of implants made of biodegradable Mg-based alloys eliminates the additional operations for removing them and the complications associated with the long-term presence of an implant in the bone. When choosing the chemical composition of a biodegradable alloy, it is important that the biocorrosion products are metabolized in the body, bioabsorbed and not toxic.
Previous studies [16] established the requirements for the development of a biodegradable Mg-based alloy intended for implants in osteosynthesis:
-
Required level of mechanical properties is as follows: ultimate tensile strength (UTS) ≥150 MPa, total elongation (TE) ≥ 3.1%. This is comparable to the properties of bone tissue and ensures its reliable fusion up to complete consolidation of the fracture (3 months);
-
No toxic effects on the body.
According to [20], the most widely used alloying elements in magnesium-based compositions are zinc, calcium, zirconium, manganese, silver, and rare earth elements. Zinc decreases the corrosive effects of some common impurities in Mg-based alloys such as iron and nickel. Additionally, a deficiency of zinc in the human body can result in serious illnesses; therefore, Zn also acts as a bioactive element in degradable magnesium alloys. Manganese improves mechanical properties and alloy viscosity at quantities below 2 wt.%. Calcium possesses grain refining effect and strengthening of grain boundaries. Due to Laves-type phases with Mg2Ca composition, creep resistance of magnesium alloys can be improved [21]. The addition of Zr and rare earth elements, namely yttrium, neodymium and cerium, also leads to grain refinement and increases the strength of magnesium alloys [22].
The toxicological and physiological properties are other important issues regarding magnesium itself and the main alloying elements for biodegradable magnesium alloys. According to data summarized in [20,23], the distinctive properties of each element are as follows.
-
Magnesium has a positive influence on metabolism, synthesis of protein, and cell proliferation. It promotes the stabilization of RNA and DNA, regulates protein activity and also affects cellular reactions;
-
Zinc is important for the immune system.
-
Calcium is mainly concentrated in bones. It regulates renal, intestinal and skeletal homeostases;
-
Zirconium possesses low toxicity and acceptable biocompatibility;
-
Rare earth elements have anticancer properties.
It has been established that the most suitable alloying system is Mg-Zr-Nd, which ensures the non-toxicity of alloying elements and the possibility of structural strengthening of the alloy [24,25]. The optimal chemical composition of a biodegradable Mg-based alloy has been determined as follows: 0.8–1.1 wt.% Zr, 2.4–2.8 wt.% Nd, 0.5–0.7 wt.% Zn. This composition ensures the following mechanical properties: UTS = 266–271 MPa; TE= 4.3–4.6%. After three months of immersion and biodegradation in artificial blood substitutes, the alloy retained mechanical properties close to the properties of bone tissue: UTS of 150 MPa and TE of 3.2% [26].
Installation of various fixing screws during osteosynthesis involves certain preparations. Using a drill and a guide, a canal is formed in the bone. In the formed channel, using a threaded tap, a thread is cut and a screw is fixed. Reliable fixation of bone tissue fragments without prior preparation with a tap is impossible because of the high possibility of damage to the implant. Thus, the preparatory formation of the canal and threading complicates the process of surgical intervention and lengthens the operation time. Therefore, an important task is to increase the mechanical properties of magnesium alloy to eliminate the specified preparatory operations.
One of the methods for increasing the mechanical properties of an alloy is modification of the microstructure. There are a number of requirements for modifying elements, one of which is non-toxicity. Noble metals, particularly silver and gold, are promising modifiers for Mg-based alloys. Gold has been known since ancient times for its bioinertness towards living organisms [27]. Silver, according to many literary sources, has an antibacterial effect [28]. An analysis of the phase diagrams of binary systems of silver and gold with magnesium showed that they can form solid solutions, as well as new intermetallic phases. These phases have higher melting points compared to magnesium, therefore they act as additional crystallization centers during the initial period of crystallization, thus refining the grain and positively affecting the properties of the metal [29].
Therefore, the development of new Mg-based alloys modified with noble metals with an improved structure and increased mechanical properties is a challenging task of biomaterials science. In this study, the separate and combined effects of silver and gold on the structure formation and properties of a biodegradable Mg-based magnesium alloy were studied.

2. Materials and Methods

The biodegradable Mg-based alloy of the following chemical composition was studied: 0.9 wt.% Zr, 2.6 wt.% Nd, 0.6 wt.% Zn, Mg is a balance. The alloy was smelted in a crucible induction furnace of 0.5-ton capacity and 140 kW power and also in a gas-protected furnace of 150 kg capacity. Preheated charge materials were loaded into the crucible furnace and, after melting, the melt was poured into removable crucibles at a temperature of 650–730 °C. Removable crucibles were installed in holding furnaces, in which the chemical composition of the alloy was adjusted followed by the flux refining (38–46 wt.% MgCl2, 32–40 wt.% KCl, 5–8 wt.% BaCl2, 3–5 wt.% CaF2) at 740–760 °C. After this, Ag and Au additives were added to the melt (0; 0.05; 0.1; 0.2 wt.%—as calculated), with subsequent heating of the melt, holding and pouring it at 730 °C into molds to obtain samples and workpieces for mechanical testing and metallographic control.
Heat treatment of cast billets was carried out in a 112 kW Bellevue-type thermal shaft furnace and also in a thermal furnace PAP-4M type. The metal was examined after heat treatment according to the following regime: heating to 540 ± 5 °C, holding for 15 h, air cooling to room temperature and aging at 200 ± 5 °C for 8 h with subsequent air cooling.
The quality of cast samples and workpieces made of Mg-based alloys was determined by X-ray control. Optical microscopy was used for the observation of the macro- and microstructure of samples (OLYMPUS IX 70). The grain size was measured according to the intercept method using the built-in software for the optical microscope. The specimens for microstructure analysis were mirror polished according to standard procedure and etched by the reagent consisting of 1% nitric acid, 20% acetic acid, 19% distilled water and 60% ethylene glycol. The microhardness of the structural components of the alloys was measured with Buehler and LM-700AT microhardness testers at a 0.1 N load.
The fractured surface of the samples was observed using a Jeol JSM-6360LA scanning electron microscope. Local chemical analysis of the structural components was performed using REMMA 202M and REM 16I scanning electron microscopes equipped with an energy-dispersive microanalyzer.
The mechanical properties of the samples were determined using an INSTRON 2801 tensile testing machine. The tensile testing was performed for as-prepared samples and for samples held in an artificial blood substitute for one, two and three months at 36 ± 1 °C. The temperature steadiness was regulated by the thermostat UT-15. The artificial blood substitute was a Gelofusine® solution. Before immersion in blood substitute, the samples were degreased by ethanol. After immersion, the samples were cleaned by chromic anhydride at 18–25 °C for 3 min to delete the corrosion products and, afterwards, they were washed in distilled water and air dried.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructure Examination

The microstructure of the alloy under study without modification was the δ-solid solution, δ + γ eutectoid in the form of spherical formations and individual intermetallic inclusions of the γ-phase. The addition of silver and gold into the alloy refined its grains. At the same time, the addition of silver contributed to a stronger grain refinement than the addition of gold. Joint modification of the alloy (Ag + Au) contributed to the formation of finer grains (Figure 1).
Macrofractographic study of fractures of as-cast samples of the original alloy of the Mg-Zr-Nd system without modification showed the presence of a coarse-crystalline structure. The separate introduction of increasing additives of silver and gold into the alloy under study refined the cast metal structure. At the same time, their combined influence enhanced the refining effect and the nature of the fracture became matte and finely crystalline.
Increasing Au and Ag additives contributed to a decrease in the grain size and the distance between the second-order axes (Table 1). Heat treatment contributed to an increase in the homogeneity of the structure and an increase in the microhardness of the matrix. With an increase in the amount of silver and gold in the metal, the microhardness of the matrix increased. At that, the microhardness of the eutectic was ~1.5 times higher than the microhardness of the δ-solid solution.
The dependence of the grain size on the content of Au and Ag can be expressed by the following regressions, respectively:
l = 599.4 · x + 221.2 ;   R 2 = 0.74 , l = 37.9 · ln x 15.7 ;   R 2 = 0.98 ,
where
  • l—average grain size, µm;
  • x—modifier content, wt.%.
When constructing the dependence for silver, zero Ag content was supposed as 0.001% Ag for the sake of correct taking the logarithm.
As follows from the EDX analysis of samples after heat treatment, the intermetallic phases contained both Ag and Au (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
According to compositions obtained for IMCs (Tables in Figure 2 and Figure 3), only two elements (Mg and Nb) are present in relatively stable quantities. Therefore, it can be assumed that the compositions under study are solid solutions on the Mg-Nb intermetallic base. In the Mg-Nd alloy system, the following five intermetallic compounds, namely Mg12Nd, Mg41Nd5, Mg3Nd, Mg2Nd and MgNd can be formed [30]. According to the mass ratio, the closest composition is Mg12Nd.

3.2. Quantitative Metallographic Analysis

The microscopic observation revealed the presence of lamellar and spherical intermetallic phases in the studied alloys. Lamellar intermetallic compounds were located predominantly along the grain boundaries, and spherical ones were located in the center of the grain. Spherical intermetallic phases can serve as additional crystallization centers and contribute to the refinement of grains and structural components of the alloy. Metallographic analysis showed that the volume fraction of the intermetallic phase increases with increasing content of alloying elements in the alloy (Table 2). When 0.05...0.10% modifiers were added to the alloy, the volume fraction of spherical intermetallic compounds increased to a greater extent compared to lamellar ones. A further increase in the alloying content (up to 0.2%) led to a slight increase in the volume fraction of spherical inclusions located inside the grain and an intensive increase in the number of lamellar inclusions.
Analysis of the distribution of intermetallides by size showed that lamellar ones were predominated in the original alloy, most of which were 4–15 μm in size. Spherical intermetallides were mainly 2.0–7.9 μm in size. Additives of Au and Ag contributed to the refinement of the intermetallic phase. The number of intermetallides smaller than 2 μm increased, but the number of coarse ones (>11.6 μm) decreased.
With an Au and Ag content of 0.05...0.1 wt.%, there was an intensive increase in the volume percentage of spherical intermetallides located inside the grain, the grain was refined and the plasticity of the alloys increased. A further increase in the content of elements in the alloy to 0.2 wt.% increased the volume percentage of lamellar and spherical intermetallic compounds and increased the tensile strength.
Thus, gold and silver, positively changing the morphology and topology of intermetallic compounds, refined the macro- and micrograins in the alloy and contributed to an increase in its mechanical properties. At the same time, the highest indicators of strength and ductility of the alloy were achieved with complex modification with noble metals (Table 3). IMS containing Ag and Au presumably possess higher melting temperatures than Mg. During cooling of the melt, IMSc with Ag and Au solidify first in the form of spherical particles. They act as crystallization sites refining the grains and improving mechanical properties.
The dependence of UTS on the content of Au and Ag can be expressed by the following regression:
U T S = 119.7 · x + 233.4 ;   R 2 = 0.88 ,
where
  • x—modifier content, wt.%.
The effect of strengthening metal matrix with intermetallic or other second-phase inclusions is analogous for different groups of alloys including aluminum [31], iron [32] and other metal-based compositions.

3.3. Mechanical Properties after Biocorrosion

The biocorrosion was studied by keeping the tensile testing samples (diameters of the head and working part were 10 mm and 5 mm, respectively) in Gelofusine® for 1, 2 and 3 months, followed by tensile testing of the corroded samples. Visual inspection of such samples after tensile testing showed the presence of multiple sites of corrosion initiation in the form of craters with the presence of crumbling white deposits from biodegradation products (Figure 4).
Microstructural study of cross sections of the heads of tensile samples has shown that the depth of the corrosion damage craters after 3 months of aging in Gelofusine® for all variants of the alloy was approximately at the same level and amounted to ~2.0 mm (Figure 5a). At the same time, corrosion damage spread throughout the body of grains of the δ-solid solution and strengthening phases (Figure 5b).
The results of mechanical tests of the studied samples after biodegradation have shown a loss of strength of the alloy with various modification options. The lowest level of strength after biocorrosion was observed in the magnesium alloy without modification. Silver and gold contributed to increasing the tensile strength of the magnesium alloy. The samples with complex modifications of Au and Ag had the highest properties after 3 months of aging in Gelofusine® (Table 4).
The conducted studies showed the possibility of successfully modifying Mg-based alloys with noble metals in amounts from 0.05 to 0.2 wt.%. An analysis of data from the literature on the use of silver and gold in the manufacture of implants showed that the experiments were mainly related to coating or use in pure form [33,34]. Other studies have shown the positive effect of silver on the properties of a Mg-based alloys.
Modification of a Mg-Nd-Zr alloys with silver and gold, described in this article, makes it possible to increase the volume fraction of intermetallic phases by ~1.5 times, shifting them towards smaller size groups, with the simultaneous formation of spherical intermetallic compounds located in the center of the grains and acting as additional crystallization centers. The obtained results as to the refinement of the microstructure of the alloy are consistent with studies carried out by other authors [35].
The studies carried out showed the possibility of reducing the grain size and significant refinement of the structural components due to the modification carried out. In addition, the dependence of the separate and joint influence of noble metals on the mechanical properties of a magnesium alloy has been established. Thus, separate modification of the alloy under study provided the maximum level of its strength and ductility with the addition of 0.1 wt.% Ag or Au, which is consistent with previous studies describing modification with other elements [36].
The results obtained show that at complex modification (0.1 wt.% Au + 0.1 wt.% Ag) of magnesium alloy, the sizes of its structural components significantly decreased, the strength of the alloy increased by ~20% and ductility by ~2 times due to the formation of intermetallic phases of complex composition. The conducted research may be of interest to manufacturers of castings from magnesium alloys. In addition, it should be noted that the modifiers used are non-toxic to the body compared to the use of, for example, rare earth elements such as yttrium or scandium [37,38,39].
The use of a biodegradable Mg-based alloy with an increased set of properties makes it possible to eliminate the preparatory operation of forming a canal and cutting threads with a tap in osseous tissue during osteosynthesis, which reduces the risk of injury during the surgical intervention and significantly reduces the time of surgery.
The results obtained make it possible to develop improved technologies for modifying cast magnesium alloys with noble metals, improving the quality of castings and increasing the mechanical properties of products. The results of these studies may be useful for aviation, automotive and other industries [40].

4. Conclusions

It has been shown that modification of a magnesium alloy with silver and gold from 0.05 to 0.2 wt.% increases the volume percentage of intermetallic compounds by ~1.5 times, shifting them towards smaller sizes with the simultaneous formation of spherical intermetallic compounds located in the center of the grain and serving as additional crystallization centers. The separate and complex introduction of silver and gold into the alloy of the Mg-Zr-Nd system contributed to a decrease in micrograin size by ~2...4 times and increased mechanical properties of the alloys in the as-manufactured state and after biocorrosion.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.G. and V.E.; methodology, V.G. and V.S.; validation, V.G., V.S. and M.B.; formal analysis, S.B. and V.E.; investigation, V.G. and I.P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.B., V.S. and V.E.; writing—review and editing, V.G., I.P. and M.B.; supervision, V.G. and I.P.; project administration, V.G. and V.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, project No. 0123U101834.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bi, Y.; Van De Motter, R.R.; Ragab, A.A.; Goldberg, V.M.; Anderson, J.M.; Greenfield, E.M. Titanium Particles Stimulate Bone Resorption by Inducing Differentiation of Murine Osteoclasts. J. Bone Jt. Surg.—Am. Vol. 2001, 83, 501–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hampp, C.; Ullmann, B.; Reifenrath, J.; Angrisani, N.; Dziuba, D.; Bormann, D.; Seitz, J.; Meyer-Lindenberg, A. Research on the Biocompatibility of the New Magnesium Alloy LANd442—An In Vivo Study in the Rabbit Tibia over 26 Weeks. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2012, 14, B28–B37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jacobs, J.J.; Hallab, N.J.; Skipor, A.K.; Urban, R.M. Metal Degradation Products: A Cause for Concern in Metal-Metal Bearings? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2003, 417, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. He, M.; Chen, L.; Yin, M.; Xu, S.; Liang, Z. Review on Magnesium and Magnesium-Based Alloys as Biomaterials for Bone Immobilization. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 23, 4396–4419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Niki, Y.; Matsumoto, H.; Suda, Y.; Otani, T.; Fujikawa, K.; Toyama, Y.; Hisamori, N.; Nozue, A. Metal Ions Induce Bone-Resorbing Cytokine Production through the Redox Pathway in Synoviocytes and Bone Marrow Macrophages. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 1447–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shi, Y.; Qi, M.; Chen, Y.; Shi, P. MAO-DCPD Composite Coating on Mg Alloy for Degradable Implant Applications. Mater. Lett. 2011, 65, 2201–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wong, H.M.; Wu, S.; Chu, P.K.; Cheng, S.H.; Luk, K.D.K.; Cheung, K.M.C.; Yeung, K.W.K. Low-Modulus Mg/PCL Hybrid Bone Substitute for Osteoporotic Fracture Fixation. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 7016–7032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nagels, J.; Stokdijk, M.; Rozing, P.M. Stress Shielding and Bone Resorption in Shoulder Arthroplasty. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2003, 12, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rosser, J.; Bonewald, L.F. Studying Osteocyte Function Using the Cell Lines MLO-Y4 and MLO-A5. In Bone Research Protocols; Methods in Molecular Biology; Helfrich, M.H., Ralston, S.H., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2012; Volume 816, pp. 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Song, S.; Song, G.-L.; Shen, W.; Liu, M. Corrosion and Electrochemical Evaluation of Coated Magnesium Alloys. Corrosion 2012, 68, 015005-1–015005-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shalomeev, V.; Aikin, N.; Chorniy, V.; Naumik, V. Design and Examination of the New Biosoluble Casting Alloy of the System Mg–Zr–Nd for Osteosynthesis. EEJET 2019, 1, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kamrani, S.; Fleck, C. Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys as Temporary Orthopaedic Implants: A Review. Biometals 2019, 32, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mathieu, S.; Rapin, C.; Steinmetz, J.; Steinmetz, P. A Corrosion Study of the Main Constituent Phases of AZ91 Magnesium Alloys. Corros. Sci. 2003, 45, 2741–2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nassif, N.; Ghayad, I. Corrosion Protection and Surface Treatment of Magnesium Alloys Used for Orthopedic Applications. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2013, 2013, 532896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, H.X.; Guan, S.K.; Wang, X.; Ren, C.X.; Wang, L.G. In Vitro Degradation and Mechanical Integrity of Mg–Zn–Ca Alloy Coated with Ca-Deficient Hydroxyapatite by the Pulse Electrodeposition Process. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6, 1743–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tan, J.; Ramakrishna, S. Applications of Magnesium and Its Alloys: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Prasad, S.V.S.; Prasad, S.B.; Verma, K.; Mishra, R.K.; Kumar, V.; Singh, S. The Role and Significance of Magnesium in Modern Day Research-A Review. J. Magnes. Alloys 2022, 10, 1–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chaudry, U.M.; Hamad, K.; Kim, J.-G. On the Ductility of Magnesium Based Materials: A Mini Review. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 792, 652–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Han, S.; Zielewski, M.; Martinez Holguin, D.; Michel Parra, M.; Kim, N. Optimization of AZ91D Process and Corrosion Resistance Using Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Antoniac, I.; Miculescu, M.; Mănescu, V.P.; Stere, A.; Quan, P.H.; Păltânea, G.; Robu, A.; Earar, K. Magnesium-Based Alloys Used in Orthopedic Surgery. Materials 2022, 15, 1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, H.; Shang, S.-L.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.-Q.; Liu, Z.-K. Thermodynamic Properties of Laves Phases in the Mg–Al–Ca System at Finite Temperature from First-Principles. Intermetallics 2012, 22, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Friedrich, H.E.; Mordike, B.L. Magnesium Technology: Metallurgy, Design Data, Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Witte, F.; Hort, N.; Vogt, C.; Cohen, S.; Kainer, K.U.; Willumeit, R.; Feyerabend, F. Degradable Biomaterials Based on Magnesium Corrosion. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2008, 12, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Niinomi, M.; Nakai, M.; Hieda, J. Development of New Metallic Alloys for Biomedical Applications. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 3888–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ou, P.; Hao, C.; Liu, J.; He, R.; Wang, B.; Ruan, J. Cytocompatibility of Ti–XZr Alloys as Dental Implant Materials. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2021, 32, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shalomeev, V.; Greshta, V.; Liutova, O.; Bovkun, S. Devising Resource-Saving Technologies for the Production of Casting from Magnesium Alloys Using Waste of Metallurgical Enterprises. EEJET 2022, 117, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Oleszek-Listopad, J.; Sarna-Bos, K.; Szabelska, A.; Czelej-Piszcz, E.; Borowicz, J.; Szymanska, J. The Use of Gold and Gold Alloys in Prosthetic Dentistry—A Literature Review. Curr. Issues Pharm. Med. Sci. 2015, 28, 192–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liao, K.-H.; Ou, K.-L.; Cheng, H.-C.; Lin, C.-T.; Peng, P.-W. Effect of Silver on Antibacterial Properties of Stainless Steel. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256, 3642–3646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shalomeev, V.; Tabunshchyk, G.; Greshta, V.; Nykiel, M.; Korniejenko, K. Influence of Alkaline Earth Metals on Structure Formation and Magnesium Alloy Properties. Materials 2022, 15, 4341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Can, W.; Peide, H.; Lu, Z.; Caili, Z.; Bingshe, X. First-Principles Study on the Stabilities of the Intermetallic Compounds in Mg-Nd Alloys. Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 2011, 40, 590–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Buttard, M.; Freixes, M.L.; Josserond, C.; Donnadieu, P.; Chéhab, B.; Blandin, J.-J.; Gault, B.; De Geuser, F.; Martin, G. Ageing Response and Strengthening Mechanisms in a New Al-Mn-Ni-Cu-Zr Alloy Designed for Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Acta Mater. 2023, 259, 119271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, Y.; Shimizu, K.; Yaer, X.; Kusumoto, K.; Efremenko, V.G. Erosive Wear Performance of Heat Treated Multi-Component Cast Iron Containing Cr, V, Mn and Ni Eroded by Alumina Spheres at Elevated Temperatures. Wear 2017, 390–391, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vazirgiantzikis, I.; George, S.L.; Pichon, L. Surface Characterisation and Silver Release from Ti-6Al-4V and Anodic TiO2 after Surface Modification by Ion Implantation. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 433, 128115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Demann, E.T.K.; Stein, P.S.; Haubenreich, J.E. Gold as an Implant in Medicine and Dentistry. J. Long-Term Eff. Med. Implant. 2005, 15, 687–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chang, W.; Shen, Y.; Su, Y.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Sun, M.; Dai, J.; Zhai, Q. Grain Refinement of AZ91 Magnesium Alloy Induced by Al-V-B Master Alloy. Metals 2019, 9, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, Z.T.; Qiao, X.G.; Xu, C.; Liu, X.Q.; Kamado, S.; Zheng, M.Y. Enhanced Strength by Precipitate Modification in Wrought Mg–Al–Ca Alloy with Trace Mn Addition. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 836, 154689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, P.; Xie, T.; Ying, T.; Zhu, H.; Zeng, X. Role of Alloyed Sc on the Corrosion Behavior of Mg. Met. Mater. Trans. A 2022, 53, 741–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Calado, L.M.; Carmezim, M.J.; Montemor, M.F. Rare Earth Based Magnesium Alloys—A Review on WE Series. Front. Mater. 2022, 8, 804906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shalomeev, V.; Tabunshchyk, G.; Greshta, V.; Korniejenko, K.; Duarte Guigou, M.; Parzych, S. Casting Welding from Magnesium Alloy Using Filler Materials That Contain Scandium. Materials 2022, 15, 4213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dieringa, H.; Hort, N.; Letzig, D.; Bohlen, J.; Höche, D.; Blawert, C.; Zheludkevich, M.; Kainer, K.U. Mg Alloys: Challenges and Achievements in Controlling Performance, and Future Application Perspectives. In Magnesium Technology 2018; The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series; Orlov, D., Joshi, V., Solanki, K.N., Neelameggham, N.R., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Microstructure of Mg-based alloy with different contents of modifiers: (a) non-modified; (b) 0.05 wt.% Au; (c) 0.1 wt.% Au; (d) 0.2 wt.% Au; (e) 0.05 wt.% Ag; (f) 0.1 wt.% Ag; (g) 0.2 wt.% Ag; (h) (0.1 wt.% Ag + 0.1 wt.% Au).
Figure 1. Microstructure of Mg-based alloy with different contents of modifiers: (a) non-modified; (b) 0.05 wt.% Au; (c) 0.1 wt.% Au; (d) 0.2 wt.% Au; (e) 0.05 wt.% Ag; (f) 0.1 wt.% Ag; (g) 0.2 wt.% Ag; (h) (0.1 wt.% Ag + 0.1 wt.% Au).
Applsci 13 12736 g001aApplsci 13 12736 g001b
Figure 2. EDX results for intermetallic phase in a Mg-based alloy modified with 0.1 wt.% Au: (a) analyzed spot; (b) chemical composition (wt.%).
Figure 2. EDX results for intermetallic phase in a Mg-based alloy modified with 0.1 wt.% Au: (a) analyzed spot; (b) chemical composition (wt.%).
Applsci 13 12736 g002
Figure 3. EDX results for intermetallic phase in a Mg-based alloy modified with 0.1% Ag: (a) analyzed spot; (b) chemical composition (wt.%).
Figure 3. EDX results for intermetallic phase in a Mg-based alloy modified with 0.1% Ag: (a) analyzed spot; (b) chemical composition (wt.%).
Applsci 13 12736 g003
Figure 4. Samples for tensile tests after exposure to Gelofusine® for (a) 1 month; (b) 2 months; (c) 3 months.
Figure 4. Samples for tensile tests after exposure to Gelofusine® for (a) 1 month; (b) 2 months; (c) 3 months.
Applsci 13 12736 g004
Figure 5. Samples from a magnesium alloy with 0.1 wt.% Ag + 0.1 wt.% Au after 3 months of aging in Gelofusine®: (a) macrostructure; (b) microstructure.
Figure 5. Samples from a magnesium alloy with 0.1 wt.% Ag + 0.1 wt.% Au after 3 months of aging in Gelofusine®: (a) macrostructure; (b) microstructure.
Applsci 13 12736 g005
Table 1. Parameters of the structure of magnesium alloy with different contents of Ag and Au.
Table 1. Parameters of the structure of magnesium alloy with different contents of Ag and Au.
Modifier Content,
wt.%
(as Calculated)
Grain Size,
μm
Secondary Dendrite Arm Spacing, SDAS, μmMicrohardness of Metal Matrix HV, MPa
Before Heat TreatmentAfter Heat Treatment
-2502411131228
0.05% Au1772011251234
0.10% Au1251911361268
0.20% Au1231811411285
0.05% Ag881911451241
0.10% Ag621811371262
0.20% Ag611611551273
0.10% Au + 0.10% Ag441512321294
Table 2. Volume fraction of intermetallic compounds (V) and their distribution by size in the alloy of the Mg-Nd-Zr system depending on Au and Ag contents.
Table 2. Volume fraction of intermetallic compounds (V) and their distribution by size in the alloy of the Mg-Nd-Zr system depending on Au and Ag contents.
ModifierContent,
wt.%
Distribution of Intermetallides (V·10−3, vol. %)
by Size Groups, µm
<22.0…3.94.0…7.98.0…11.511.6…15.015.1…19.0Total
No alloying with Au/Ag7/019/5337/2931/1131/1219/0144/105
Au0.0540/182/7521/4311/2531/019/1204/145
0.1065/291/15543/4311/1919/17/1236/221
0.2076/79160/12942/256/718/10/1302/242
Ag0.0547/148/11031/4325/3735/719/1205/199
0.1091/1929/11647/4419/3219/716/1221/219
0.20147/6225/11673/3419/2611/75/0280/245
0.1 wt.% Au + 0.1 wt.% Ag143/112111/11969/719/140/00/0232/316
Note: the numerator—the volume percentage of lamellar intermetallides, the denominator—the volume percentage of spherical intermetallides.
Table 3. Mechanical properties of the Mg-based alloy depending on Ag and Au contents (after heat treatment).
Table 3. Mechanical properties of the Mg-based alloy depending on Ag and Au contents (after heat treatment).
Modifier Content, wt.%
(as Calculated)
Mechanical Properties
UTS, MPaTE, %
-2323.6
0.05% Au2364.0
0.10% Au2505.7
0.20% Au2544.9
0.05% Ag2394.7
0.10% Ag2525.9
0.20% Ag2565.4
0.10% Au + 0.10% Ag2626.2
Table 4. Mechanical properties of the Mg-based alloy depending on Ag and Au contents after different times of immersion in Gelofusine®.
Table 4. Mechanical properties of the Mg-based alloy depending on Ag and Au contents after different times of immersion in Gelofusine®.
Modifier Content,
wt.%
(as Calculated)
UTS after Immersion in Gelofusine®, MPa
1 Month2 Months3 Months
-232170150
0.05% Au236200190
0.10% Au250205200
0.20% Au254195185
0.05% Ag239201200
0.10% Ag252208205
0.20% Ag256205202
0.10% Au + 0.10% Ag262215210
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Greshta, V.; Shalomeev, V.; Bovkun, S.; Petryshynets, I.; Efremenko, V.; Brykov, M. Influence of Noble Metals on the Microstructure and Properties of Biodegradable Mg-Nd-Zr Alloy. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 12736. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132312736

AMA Style

Greshta V, Shalomeev V, Bovkun S, Petryshynets I, Efremenko V, Brykov M. Influence of Noble Metals on the Microstructure and Properties of Biodegradable Mg-Nd-Zr Alloy. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(23):12736. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132312736

Chicago/Turabian Style

Greshta, Viktor, Vadim Shalomeev, Svitlana Bovkun, Ivan Petryshynets, Vasily Efremenko, and Michail Brykov. 2023. "Influence of Noble Metals on the Microstructure and Properties of Biodegradable Mg-Nd-Zr Alloy" Applied Sciences 13, no. 23: 12736. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132312736

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop