# A Method to Optimize Routing Paths for City-Pair Airlines on Three-Layer Air Transport Networks

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

#### 1.1. Related Work

#### 1.2. Our Contributions

- (1)
- The three-layer networks, including air route network, city-pair airline network and flight operation network, are built to model the air transportation system from physical facilities to application, where the air route network is regarded as the physical layer, and the city-pair airline network and flight operation network are the application layers. In addition, the topology characteristics of the three-layer networks are analysed using the complex network theory.
- (2)
- A simulated annealing-based method is proposed to optimize the routing paths of each city-pair airline based on the three-layer air transport networks, such that the congestion issue of air route segments in the air route network can be reduced.

## 2. Multi-Layer Air Transport Networks

#### 2.1. Construction of Air Transport Networks

**Definition**

**1.**

**Definition**

**2.**

**Definition**

**3.**

- (1)
- t < ${t}_{f}^{dep}$ and ${t}_{f}^{arr}$ < $t+T$
- (2)
- ${t}_{f}^{dep}$ < t and ${t}_{f}^{arr}$ < $t+T$
- (3)
- t < ${t}_{f}^{dep}$ and $t+T$ < ${t}_{f}^{arr}$
- (4)
- ${t}_{f}^{dep}$ < t and $t+T$ < ${t}_{f}^{arr}$

#### 2.2. Mapping of Air Transport Networks

#### 2.2.1. Coupling Relationship between ${G}_{AN}$ and ${G}_{ARN}$

#### 2.2.2. Coupling Relationship between ${G}_{AN}$ and ${G}_{FN}$

#### 2.2.3. Coupling Relationship between ${G}_{ARN}$ and ${G}_{FN}$

#### 2.3. Problem Description

- (1)
- JiNan → P200 → P64 → P223 → P181 → ATV → P42 → Hefei
- (2)
- JiNan → P86 → P182 → ATV → P42 → Hefei
- (3)
- JiNan → P197 → P182 → ATV → P42 → Hefei

- (1)
- JiNan → P197 → NJHLD → SZPOI → ShangHai
- (2)
- JiNan → P58 → WZPYI → SZPOI → ShangHai
- (3)
- JiNan → P60 → YC → SZPOI → ShangHai

- -
- the air route network, ${G}_{ARN}$, which is the basis of national airspace and will affect the flight distance and operational capacity of the air transportation system;
- -
- the city-pair airline network, ${G}_{AN}$, which represents the existence of flights between a pair of airports or not;
- -
- the flight operation network, ${G}_{FN}^{t}$, at different time intervals $[t,t+1)$, $1\le t\le 24$, which represents the air traffic flows based on the timetable of flights;
- -
- the coupling relationship between the three-layer air transport networks, as discussed in Section 2.2.
- -
- the candidate routing paths ${S}_{crp}^{i,j}$ for the each city-pair airline ${l}_{i,j}$ in ${G}_{AN}$.

## 3. Routing Paths Optimization of City-Pair Airlines

- (a)
- A city-pair airline ${l}_{rev}$ of ${G}_{AN}$ is selected, randomly. Furthermore, the traffic flows in the corresponding routing path (air route segments) on air route network ${G}_{ARN}$ should be updated.
- (b)
- Each candidate routing path in the set ${S}_{crp}^{i,j}$ is evaluated for the removed airline ${l}_{rev}$, and the best one is selected.
- (c)
- According to the selected best routing path, the traffic flows on the corresponding air route segments are updated actually.

#### Objective Function

## 4. Experiments

#### 4.1. Analysis of Aviation Networks

#### 4.1.1. Air Route Network

#### 4.1.2. City-Pair Airline Network

#### 4.2. Optimization Results

- (1)
- “$Default$”, which takes the routing path used by air traffic managers in practice;
- (2)
- “$Shortest$”, which takes the shortest length routing path from the candidate set ${S}_{crp}^{i,j}$ for airline ${l}_{i,j}$;
- (3)
- “$Random$”, which takes a routing path for airline ${l}_{i,j}$ from its candidate set ${S}_{crp}^{i,j}$;
- (4)
- “$Proposed$”, which is the proposed simulated annealing-based method to select the optimal routing paths.

## 5. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Conflicts of Interest

## Nomenclature

${G}_{ARN}$ | Graph of the air route network |

${G}_{FN}^{t}$ | Graph of the flight operation network at time t |

${G}_{AN}$ | Graph of the city-pair airline network |

${r}_{i,j}$ | air route segment connecting city i and city j |

${l}_{i,j}$ | city-pair airline connecting city i and city j |

## References

- Newman, M.E. The structure and function of complex networks. Siam Rev.
**2003**, 45, 167–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Mou, J.; Liu, C.; Chen, S.; Huang, G.; Lu, X. Temporal characteristics of the chinese aviation network and their effects on the spread of infectious diseases. Sci. Rep.
**2017**, 7, 1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] - Yan, Y.; Cao, G. Operational concepts and key technologies of next generation air traffic mangement system. Command. Inf. Syst. Technol.
**2018**, 9, 8–17. [Google Scholar] - Bertsimas, D.; Odoni, A. A Critical Survey of Optimization Models for Tactical and Strategic Aspects of Air Traffic Flow Management; NASA: Washington, DC, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, J.; Xu, Q.; Yan, Y.; Ding, H.; Tian, J. Generalized method of modeling minute-in-trail strategy for air traffic flow management. Math. Probl. Eng.
**2019**, 2019, 6059608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - FAA. Traffic Flow Management in the National Airspace System; FAA National Headquarters: Washington, DC, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Rocha, L.E. Dynamics of air transport networks: A review from a complex systems perspective. Chin. J. Aeronaut.
**2017**, 30, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, W.; Cai, X. Statistical analysis of airport network of china. Phys. Rev.
**2004**, 69, 046106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Kurant, M.; Thiran, P. Extraction and analysis of traffic and topologies of transportation networks. Phys. Rev.
**2006**, 74, 036114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Barrat, A.; Barthelemy, M.; Pastor-Satorras, R.; Vespignani, A. The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
**2004**, 101, 3747–3752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Newman, M.E. Analysis of weighted networks. Phys. Rev.
**2004**, 70, 056131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Zanin, M.; Lillo, F. Modelling the air transport with complex networks: A short review. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.
**2013**, 215, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Guimera, R.; Amaral, L.A.N. Modeling the world-wide airport network. Eur. Phys. J.
**2004**, 38, 381–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Watts, D.J.; Strogatz, S.H. Collective dynamics of small world networks. Nature
**1998**, 393, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Verma, T.; Araújo, N.A.; Herrmann, H.J. Revealing the structure of the world airline network. Sci. Rep.
**2014**, 4, 5638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] - Bagler, G. Analysis of the airport network of india as a complex weighted network. Phys. Stat. Mech. Its Appl.
**2008**, 387, 2972–2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Da Rocha, L.E. Structural evolution of the brazilian airport network. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp.
**2009**, 2009, P04020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jia, T.; Qin, K.; Shan, J. An exploratory analysis on the evolution of the us airport network. Phys. Stat. Mech. Its Appl.
**2014**, 413, 266–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lordan, O.; Sallan, J.M. Analyzing the multilevel structure of the european airport network. Chin. J. Aeronaut.
**2017**, 30, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Zhang, J.; Cao, X.-B.; Du, W.-B.; Cai, K.-Q. Evolution of chinese airport network. Phys. Stat. Mech. Its Appl.
**2010**, 389, 3922–3931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Du, W.-B.; Zhou, X.-L.; Lordan, O.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, C.; Zhu, Y.-B. Analysis of the chinese airline network as multi-layer networks. Transp. Part Logist. Transp. Rev.
**2016**, 89, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Yang, Y.; Xu, K.; Wu, J. Empirical structural analysis on chinese airline network. In Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 2757–2764. [Google Scholar]
- Wandelt, S.; Sun, X.; Zhang, J. Evolution of domestic airport networks: A review and comparative analysis. Transp. Transp.
**2019**, 7, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kai-Quan, C.; Jun, Z.; Wen-Bo, D.; Xian-Bin, C. Analysis of the chinese air route network as a complex network. Chin. Phys.
**2012**, 21, 028903. [Google Scholar] - Cai, K.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, C.; Cao, X.; Tang, K. Using computational intelligence for large scale air route networks design. Appl. Soft Comput.
**2012**, 12, 2790–2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Du, W.; Liang, B.; Yan, G.; Lordan, O.; Cao, X. Identifying vital edges in chinese air route network via memetic algorithm. Chin. J. Aeronaut.
**2017**, 30, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Sun, X.; Wandelt, S.; Linke, F. On the topology of air navigation route systems. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport; Thomas Telford Ltd.: Telford, UK, 2016; Volume 170, pp. 46–59. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, X.; Wandelt, S.; Linke, F. Temporal evolution analysis of the european air transportation system: Air navigation route network and airport network. Transp. Transp. Dyn.
**2015**, 3, 153–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shiyan, L.I.U.; Zhenfu, L.I.; Zhong, J.; Daqing, L.I. Percolation transition in temporal airport network. Chin. J. Aeronaut.
**2019**, 33, 219–226. [Google Scholar]

**Figure 2.**The flight operation network ${G}_{FN}^{t}$ in different time intervals based on the flight schedule of one day in 2019.

**Figure 3.**An example of the mapping relations of a three-layer air transport network with six cities, JiNan, HeFei, YanCheng, NanTong, NanJing, and ShangHai. (

**a**–

**c**) show the flight operation networks in the time intervals of 9:00–10:00, 18:00–19:00, and 21:00–22:00, respectively. (

**d**) shows the city-pair airline network among these six cities. (

**e**) shows the air route network of China, and (

**f**) shows the routing path on the air route network for the city-pair airline “Hefei → Shanghai ”.

**Figure 6.**The first ten traffic flows of an air route network in the time interval 9:00–10:00 under different routing-path strategies.

**Table 1.**Three different factors of air transportation network and most researches hardly cover flight operation network.

Factors Discussed in Research | Air Route | City-Pair Airline | Flight Operation |
---|---|---|---|

[8,10,12,13,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23] | √ | - | - |

[9,25,27] | - | √ | - |

[2,24,26,28,29] | √ | √ | - |

This paper | √ | √ | √ |

Parameters | 2012 [24] | 2015 | 2018 | 2019 |
---|---|---|---|---|

Nodes | 147 | 198 | 227 | 233 |

Edges | 1055 | 2657 | 3919 | 4498 |

Average degree | 14.35 | 16.83 | 22.52 | 24.98 |

Average shortest path length | 2.20 | 2.29 | 2.29 | 2.25 |

Diameter | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 |

Mixing coefficient | −0.15 | −0.45 | −0.38 | −0.36 |

Clustering coefficient | 0.79 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.58 |

**Table 3.**The maximum traffic flows of air route segments in different time intervals using different routing path methods.

Time Interval | Maximum Traffic Flows | |||
---|---|---|---|---|

$\mathit{Default}$ | $\mathit{Shortest}$ | $\mathit{Random}$ | $\mathit{Proposed}$ | |

0:00–1:00 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 |

1:00–2:00 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 |

2:00–3:00 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 |

3:00–4:00 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 |

4:00–5:00 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |

5:00–6:00 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 |

6:00–7:00 | 24 | 22 | 24 | 23 |

7:00–8:00 | 43 | 41 | 43 | 42 |

8:00–9:00 | 52 | 56 | 56 | 51 |

9:00–10:00 | 54 | 56 | 56 | 52 |

10:00–11:00 | 45 | 49 | 49 | 41 |

11:00–12:00 | 38 | 38 | 36 | 37 |

12:00–13:00 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 39 |

13:00–14:00 | 44 | 47 | 47 | 43 |

14:00–15:00 | 41 | 45 | 45 | 40 |

15:00–16:00 | 45 | 42 | 42 | 42 |

16:00–17:00 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 48 |

17:00–18:00 | 46 | 48 | 48 | 47 |

18:00–19:00 | 43 | 44 | 44 | 43 |

19:00–20:00 | 43 | 45 | 45 | 42 |

20:00–21:00 | 40 | 41 | 41 | 39 |

21:00–22:00 | 38 | 40 | 40 | 37 |

22:00–23:00 | 42 | 41 | 42 | 41 |

23:00–00:00 | 31 | 32 | 32 | 30 |

$Average$ | 33.08 | 33.88 | 33.96 | 32.33 |

1.0 | - | - | −2.4% | |

- | 1.0 | - | −4.6% | |

- | - | 1.0 | −4.8% |

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |

© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Ding, H.; Hu, M.; Xu, Q.; Tian, Y.; Yin, J.
A Method to Optimize Routing Paths for City-Pair Airlines on Three-Layer Air Transport Networks. *Appl. Sci.* **2023**, *13*, 866.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020866

**AMA Style**

Ding H, Hu M, Xu Q, Tian Y, Yin J.
A Method to Optimize Routing Paths for City-Pair Airlines on Three-Layer Air Transport Networks. *Applied Sciences*. 2023; 13(2):866.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020866

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Ding, Hui, Minghua Hu, Qiucheng Xu, Yungang Tian, and Jianan Yin.
2023. "A Method to Optimize Routing Paths for City-Pair Airlines on Three-Layer Air Transport Networks" *Applied Sciences* 13, no. 2: 866.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020866