Next Article in Journal
Glycerol Steam Reforming in a Pilot Plant: Effect of Temperature and Catalyst Load
Next Article in Special Issue
Nitrogen Dioxide Gas Levels in TBM Tunnel Construction with Diesel Locomotives Based on Directive 2017/164/EU
Previous Article in Journal
NTT and Inverse NTT Quantum Circuits in CRYSTALS-Kyber for Post-Quantum Security Evaluation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vibration Characteristics Analysis of Immersed Tunnel Structures Based on a Viscoelastic Beam Model Embedded in a Fluid-Saturated Soil System Due to a Moving Load
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Full-Scale Model Test of Subway Contact Channel under Mechanical Construction †

1
Beijing MTR Construction Administration Corporation, Beijing 100068, China
2
Beijing Key Laboratory of Fully Automatic Operation and Safety Monitoring For Urban Rail Transit, Beijing 100068, China
3
Collaborative Innovation Center of Coastal Urban Rail Transit, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Full-Scale Model Test of Subway Contact Channel under Mechanical Construction, Ningbo, China, 15 December 2022.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(18), 10375; https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810375
Submission received: 25 July 2023 / Revised: 7 September 2023 / Accepted: 12 September 2023 / Published: 16 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Underground Engineering: Excavation, Monitoring, and Control)

Abstract

:
The mechanical construction method for a subway contact channel has the advantages of a short construction period and high safety, and is more and more being applied in coastal soft-soil areas. In order to explore the suitability of this method in inland areas, a full-scale model test platform is used to simulate the shield-cutting construction process of the subway contact channel. The convergence deformation of the segments and the strain of the reinforcement and concrete are tested, so as to analyze the internal force and deformation law of the tunnel structure during cutting construction. The influence of the steel ring on the deformation of the subway contact channel is also studied. It is found that the segment convergence at the top is less than that at the waist position, and the convergence deformation of the waist is less than 30 mm; the internal force of the segment redistributes and the axial force mainly decreases during the cutting process; the stress state may change from compression to tension. The segment structure of the main tunnel, the supporting structure in the tunnel, and the stiffness of the steel-ring-lined composite pipe segment have little influence on the cutting force of the contact channel. The research results provide the corresponding technical indexes for the construction of a contact channel by the mechanical method, as well as a reference for the design and optimization of a steel-ring-lined composite pipe segment.

1. Introduction

Urban traffic problems have become more serious with the continuous expansion of cities and rapid population growth. In this regard, the construction of subways is an effective measure to alleviate traffic congestion. A previous specification [1] stipulated that a contact channel should be set up when the continuous length between two single-track running tunnels of urban rail transit is longer than 600 m. At present, the methods of contact channel construction include the open excavation method, the freezing method [2], and the emerging mechanical method [3,4]. The open excavation method is relatively simple, but it is generally suitable for areas with good geological conditions, stable soil, and no heavy load around. The freezing method is used to excavate soil with a high water content after freezing, which has the advantages of causing less pollution and not being affected by the surrounding environment. However, it needs high technical requirements for construction, and will cause large surface settlement. The mechanical method, compared with the above two methods, has the advantages of a higher degree of mechanization, shorter construction period, safer construction, and smaller ground surface settlement. Mechanical connection channels have been applied in underground projects at home and abroad, which have unveiled its broad application prospects. These projects include the safety corridors of the Fourth Elbe River Tunnel in Hamburg, Germany, the brunch lines of the Emisor Oriente Tunnel in Mexico, and the rail transits in Ningbo [5,6], Wuxi [7], Hangzhou [8,9], and Beijing [10].
Some scholars carried out research on the construction, design, and calculation method for mechanical contact channel technology. Zhu et al. [3] led the development of the engineering practice for mechanical connection channels in China and put forward a new construction concept characterized by “micro-reinforcement, machinable, tight sealing and strong supporting”, and expounded the cutting method and matters needing attention. Liu et al. [4] studied the initial process of the mechanized drilling of contact tunnels through two full-scale tests and found that tunnel segments, together with the internal supports, carry the additional loads resulting from the cutting process. Meanwhile, other experts studied the security issue of mechanical connection channels under train loads and seismic loads using the finite element method and concluded that joints are prone to fatigue damage under dynamic loads [11,12]. Zhang et al. [13,14] took the practical application of a mechanical contact channel in a coastal area as the background, evaluated the construction safety, and verified the applicability of mechanical contact channel construction in a high-water-pressure mudstone stratum by numerical simulation. In recent years, it has been found in engineering practice that steel-ring secondary lining composite segments should be used at connecting positions to ensure a good seal between the contact channel and the main tunnel, but its deformation law in the cutting process has not been extensively studied yet [15]. This is because steel-ring secondary lining composite segments are of great significance for both the safety of cutting construction and the long-term stability of the main tunnel and the contact channel. Accordingly, studies on the stress and deformation of steel-ring secondary lining composite segments in main tunnels have become extremely significant in the design and construction of mechanical connection channels.
At present, the research on the application and mechanical properties of steel-ring secondary lining structures in tunnels is relatively simple [16,17,18,19], and studies on the special positions of tunnels are especially lacking. In a previous study, Hirosawa et al. [20] conducted bending and thrust tests on two kinds of concrete-filled composite segments. They obtained the mechanical characteristics of the steel–concrete composite segment and then put forward guiding suggestions for the design of concrete-filled composite segments in engineering practice. Meanwhile, Liao et al. [21] evaluated the design theory of fiber-reinforced composite segments and optimized the structural design of steel–concrete composite segments, making them more suitable for practical engineering applications.
However, there is still a lack of research on the stress and deformation of steel-ring secondary lining composite segments under the construction conditions of mechanical connection channels. In addition, the applicability of the mechanical connection channel construction technology in the Beijing subway has not yet been checked. Thus, a full-scale model test is conducted in this paper to study the influence of the cutting construction of contact channels on the stress and deformation of the tunnel structure. The impact of steel–concrete composite segments on the cutting construction is evaluated for Beijing Metro Line 19.
The above-mentioned related research has made some achievements in the mechanical properties and design application of steel-ring lining composite segments. However, the research on the stress and deformation of the contact channel during shield cutting using a large model test is lacking. In addition, the mechanical construction technology of the contact channel is used in soft-soil areas, where the soil strength is weak, and the stress of tunnel segments is different in different soil strengths, so its applicability in areas with strong soil strength still needs to be checked. Based on the application background of the mechanical connecting passage of Beijing Rail Transit Line 19, this paper studies the tunnel structural response during the cutting construction of the contact channel through the full-scale model test platform. Additionally, the influence of the steel-ring lining composite segment on the cutting construction is also studied, so as to provide guidance for the subsequent application of this technology in Beijing Rail Transit.

2. Test Scheme

2.1. Test Object

The shield section of Beijing Metro Line 19 starts at the south side of Qinghe River and ends at Xiaoying West Road. The mechanical method is proposed for the construction of three connection channels in this project. The soil layers that the connection channels cross are mainly silty clay, clayey silt, sandy silt, sandy soil, and pebble gravel layers. Through geological and hydrogeological investigations, it was found that the existing mechanical method of connection channel construction technology could not be directly applied in this project. The main reason is that the communication channel construction technology is developed for coastal soft-soil areas. The earth pressure and formation resistance are different in different geological conditions, which further affects the construction safety. In this regard, a full-scale model test for connection channel construction with typical geological conditions in Beijing was conducted.
Given the condition of the test platform, the engineering tunnel structure was simplified as illustrated in Figure 1. The structural system included the segment of the cutting position and the segment of the main influence area of the cutting construction, which had seven rings in total. Each ring segment consisted of a cap block (F), adjacent blocks (L1 and L2), and standard blocks (B1, B2, and B3). The whole-environment, full-scale test model had the same size and assembly method as those of the actual segments, of which the middle three rings (the fourth ring is called the cutting ring; the third and fifth rings are called the half-cutting rings) were assembled with a straight joint with a ring width of 1500 mm. The other four rings (also called standard rings) were assembled with staggered joints with a ring width of 1200 mm. The segment had an outer diameter of 6200 mm, an inner diameter of 5500 mm, and a ring thickness of 350 mm. The two special-position segments of the middle three rings (B1 and B3) were steel-ring, double-lined composite segments composed of steel liners, fiber bars, and concrete.

2.2. Test Platform

The full-scale test relied on the comprehensive test platform of Ningbo University. The basic components of the platform included a modular soil pressure simulation device, modular support base, foundation simulation device, tunnel segment longitudinal loading simulation device, multi-ring segment tunnel test unit assembly and transportation device, multi-ring segment tunnel test unit lifting device, and connecting channel shield-tunneling machine receiving simulation device. The platform can conduct 1:1 physical model tests of shield-tunneling construction, which truly simulate and test the bearing capacity of the segment lining structures under normal load and ultimate load, the mechanical transmission between rings, and other mechanical properties. Additionally, the platform can also simulate the construction progress of mechanical connection channels to study the influence of the cutting process on the main channel structures.
The loading system of the test platform adopted a steel counter-stress frame connected by a seven-ring flange as the main body, and the loading was assisted by 24 oil cylinders per ring. There were 168 oil cylinders in total, as shown in Figure 2. The displacement accuracy of the oil cylinder is 0.1 mm, which can realize three control modes: load control, displacement control, and load–displacement control. From this, the actual resistance of soil layers can be simulated accurately.

2.3. Monitoring Scheme

For studying the stress and deformation law of the tunnel segment structure, the convergence deformation and stress change of the segment structure were monitored by laying a pull-line displacement meter and a strain gauge, respectively. A total of 15 pull-line displacement meters were arranged at 0°, 90°, and 270° of the tunnel segment, with each ring having three pull-line displacement meters. Figure 3 shows the installation conditions.
Figure 4 shows the layout scheme of the measuring points of the steel strain gauges for the tunnel segments. Figure 4a shows the standard ring segment condition, where 13 test sections are selected for arranging steel strain gauges, and 104 strain gauges are applied in total. Figure 4b shows the cutting ring segment condition, where 9 test sections are selected, and 72 strain gauges are applied in total. In these figures, take N2-1 as an example. N stands for the steel bar strain gauge, 2 stands for the second ring, and 1 stands for the first strain gauge of the ring.
Figure 5 shows the layout scheme of the measuring points of the concrete strain gauges for the tunnel segments. Figure 5a shows the standard ring segment condition, where 13 test sections are also selected to arrange the concrete strain gauges along the outer curved surface, and 26 strain gauges are applied in total. Figure 5b shows the condition of the cutting ring segments, where 9 test sections are selected, and 27 strain gauges are applied in total. In these figures, with HN2-5 as an example, HN stands for the concrete strain gauge, 2 stands for the second ring, and 5 stands for the fifth strain gauge of the ring.
The aggregation of monitoring contents and monitoring sensors are listed in Table 1.

2.4. Test Conditions

(1) Initial condition
Based on the engineering design data and geological conditions, the earth pressure at different positions of the tunnel structure was calculated and simulated by oil cylinder loading. The positions of cylinders are shown in Figure 2 (24 cylinders), and the loading schemes of each cylinder are shown in Table 2 and Table 3. The 24 cylinders in each ring were controlled to load in the original round state first. Then, the displacement of the lower oil cylinders No. 19–24 was locked, and the other oil cylinders were controlled by load. The soil pressures were gradually loaded to the designed value in 10 stages. Thereafter, the load control mode of cylinders No. 7–12 in the top range remained unchanged, and the control modes of oil cylinders No. 1–6 and No. 13–18 were switched to load–displacement curve control. The test was conducted step by step. Starting from the second loading step, each step was loaded after the stress and deformation of the upper stage were stabilized. The loading conditions of the standard and cutting rings in each oil cylinder are shown in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively.
(2) Adding internal support condition
In the adding internal support condition, an internal support system was simulated in the tunnel to provide support to the segments. First, the supports of the top, bottom, and waist parts were stretched horizontally and longitudinally to ensure the three parts reached the inner surface of the tunnel. Then, the oil cylinders were loaded to add internal support to the tunnel. Second, with the displacement of the waist supports unchanged, the top supports were loaded in stages with a small load and locked after reaching a certain pressure value. Third, the waist supports were loaded step by step under a small load and locked after reaching a certain pressure value. The above operations were repeated until the supporting stress reached the required pre-supporting stress before this working condition was finished. A sketch of the internal support system is shown in Figure 6.
(3) Cutting construction condition
The cutting condition simulated the influence of internal segment cutting on the steel rings, secondary lining composite segments, and adjacent segments. In this condition, the external loading modes of the segments were kept unchanged. Additionally, the load values and load control modes of oil cylinders No. 7−12 as well as the load value and the load−displacement curve control mode of oil cylinders No. 1−6 and No. 13−18 remained unchanged.
(4) Dismantling internal support condition
The dismantling of the internal support simulated the influence of the internal support system on the segment structure of the main tunnel after dismantling. First, the internal supports were dismantled after all the external loads had remained stable for some time. Then, keeping the load of oil cylinders No. 7−12 unchanged, oil cylinders No. 1−6 and No. 13−18 remained controlled by the load–displacement curve. Later, the control steps were reduced step by step, with the next loading step being conducted after each step to ensure the stability of the load and displacement until the end of the support dismantling.

3. Deformation Results and Analysis

Figure 7 shows the test results of the segment convergence deformation under the initial condition. The figure shows that each ring segment was elliptically deformed under the initial condition. The convergence deformation of the top and waist positions increased step by step with the loading step. It had a linear relationship with the number of stages and increased by about 1.5 mm under each stage of loading. After the initial condition (ten−level loading), the segment convergent deformation had a certain rebound, and the convergence deformation of the top and waist positions of each ring segment was maintained at about 15 mm (the segment was still in the elastic stage). Under the initial condition, the inward convergence deformation of the top position of each ring segment was consistent with the extrusion deformation of the waist position, indicating that the load−displacement control loading scheme could simulate the mechanical characteristics of the tunnel segment in actual soil layers.
Figure 8 shows the test results of the segment convergence deformation under the adding internal support condition. The figure shows that because of the erection of the internal support system in the tunnel under the working condition, the pre−supported structure influenced the convergence deformation of the top-position segment. When the top support and the front and rear supports of the waist approached the segment and were loaded step by step, the convergence deformation of the top-position segment decreased by about 1 mm, and the force at the top position was 800 kN. Afterward, with the increase in the loading of the internal support, the convergence deformation of the top and waist positions of the segment was not obvious. In the later stage, when the force at the top position gradually increased to the test set point, the displacement of each ring segment was reduced by about 1−2 mm again, and the change was basically linear. Because the waist position of the middle three rings adopted the steel-ring secondary lining composite segment, the convergence deformation change of the waist position was smaller than that of the top position, indicating that the pre−supporting force at the waist position had less influence on the composite segment.
Figure 9 shows the test results of the segment convergence deformation under the cutting condition. The figure shows that under the cutting condition, the change in the convergence deformation of the top position in the initial stage was small, and the change for each ring was about 1 mm. Thereafter, during the cutting process, the front and rear support forces at the waist position were kept unchanged, the thrust of the shield machine was stable at 1700 kN, and the unloading effect on the top-position support was performed within a small control range. At this time, the convergence deformation of the top-position segment increased by about 1−2 mm, but the latter remained basically stable. Because the segment at the cutting position was not constrained by longitudinal and circumferential bolts, from the time when the cutter head of the shield machine started cutting to the time when the cutter head wore the hole, a large dislocation occurred outward, and an obvious convergence deformation change occurred. Therefore, under the cutting condition, the waist position at the opening side had a significantly larger convergence deformation than that of the waist position at the back side, and the convergence deformation of the third and fourth cutting rings was about 250 mm, indicating that the steel-ring secondary lining composite segment at the waist position was controlled by the side of the hole.
Figure 10 shows the results of the convergence deformation test of the segment under the dismantling condition. The figure shows that in the dismantling of the internal support, the convergence deformation of each ring segment increased according to the increase in the unloading series of the internal support. Finally, the displacement of the top and waist positions of the segment increased by about 2−3 mm. During the whole dismantling process, the convergence deformation of the top of the middle third ring was relatively stable, and the convergence of the waist changed obviously. This was because the internal support system played a significant role in supporting the segment in the tunnel during the construction. When the internal support system was gradually unloaded and dismantled, the waist of the cutting ring lost its structural integrity due to construction and other factors, which resulted in a relatively large deformation.
Figure 11 shows the overall convergence deformation test results of the five−ring segment under different working conditions. The figure shows that the convergence deformation at the top of the middle three−ring segment was slightly larger than that at the top of both sides, and the convergence deformation of the top position of each ring was relatively consistent under different working conditions. The convergence deformation of the waist position of each ring was relatively consistent under different working conditions. Because of the cutting effect of the steel-ring secondary lining composite segment, the resulting convergence deformation was larger than that of the standard ring. During the cutting process, the oscillation caused by the thrust of the shield machine oil cylinder and the cutting of the segment greatly influenced the whole segment, and the convergence deformation of the top and waist positions increased by about 2−4 mm. Because of the erection of the internal support system, the whole ring segment was well supported, and the convergence deformation of the segment was buffered; thus, the convergence deformation was basically stable. Table 4 shows the comparison of the convergence deformations of the segment under the initial and dismantling conditions. The table shows that the maximum convergence deformations of the top and waist positions of the segment did not exceed 20 and 30 mm, respectively, which were about four-thousandths that of the entire ring, meeting the requirements of the serviceability limit states (30 mm).

4. Strain Results and Analysis

4.1. Strain on the Segment of Cutting Rings

Figure 12 shows the variation of the steel bar strain of each test condition. In this figure, the time of each working condition is set as a time factor. Additionally, the initial stage time is 0−18.5; the pre-shoring stage time is 18.5−30.5; the cutting stage is 30.5−42; the shoring stage is 42−55. It can be seen that the change laws of the stresses on the internal and external arcs of the cutting ring were basically the same. In the initial working condition, the steel bars at the top and bottom of the cutting ring were under pressure and the steel bars at the internal arc were under tension. The steel bar strain increased step by step with the loading condition. After the first nine stages of loading, the steel bar strains on the inner and external arcs were almost constant during the maintenance of the pressure of each hydraulic cylinder. After the 10th stage of loading was completed, the compressive strain first increased and then decreased before it stabilized in the end. In the pre-support condition, after the top internal support was fitted to the segment, the load increased step by step until the loading process was completed, and the tensile and compressive strains first decreased and then increased. In the cutting condition, the cutter head started to drill as the top thrust of the shield machine increased, and the steel bar compressive strain at the top and bottom positions of the segment of the outer arc gradually decreased before it tended to stabilize. In the support-dismantling condition, the steel bar strain at the top and bottom positions increased as the top of the internal support was unloaded step by step. The top of the segment tended to converge inward again before it became stable in the end. The test was conducted at the contraflexure points of N4−9 and N4-10. Until the end of the whole test condition, the tensile strain of section N4−9 fluctuated within 100 με and only showed a slight increase under the support-dismantling condition. In general, the overall variation was consistent with the mechanical law of external tensile stress and internal compressive stress, though there was a slight difference in the steel bar strains of the internal and external arcs of each tested section due to the imbalance in the forces exerted by the support system with pre-support construction.
Figure 13 shows the variation of the concrete segment strain at different locations of the cutting ring. The figure shows that the initial concrete strain of the segment at the top position (No. HN4−2) was within −10 με. Then, the concrete strain increased step by step with loading under the initial condition until the concrete tensile strain of the external arc stabilized at around 22−25 με after the completion of the 10th stage of loading. In the pre-support condition, the concrete strain was basically stable. In the cutting condition, the concrete strain on the top external arc gradually increased with the increase in the thrust of the shield machine and was finally maintained at around 30 με. In the support−dismantling condition, the tensile strain decreased to around 10 με as the inner support of the segment was removed. Then, little variation occurred for the concrete segment strain during the full-scale model test. The concrete segment strains at the bottom position (No. HN4−8) were compressive strains fluctuating from 0 to −80 με with an overall rising trend at first, which then stabilized afterward. The initial concrete segment strain at the top side (HN4−23) was approximately −10 με. With the loading of the initial working condition, the strain also increased and then stabilized at around −200 με after the completion of the 10th stage of loading. In the pre-support condition, the concrete segment strain fluctuated frequently and finally stabilized at −170 με. In the cutting condition, the concrete segment strain at the top position first increased with the cutting process and then basically stabilized at −200 με. In the support-dismantling condition, the variation of the concrete segment strain was not significant. The concrete segment strain at the bottom position was compressive throughout the whole process, varying from 0 to −200 με with an initially increasing overall trend that stabilized in the end. During the whole testing process, the top and bottom of the segment were less in tension and compression, but the bending moment and axial force increased because the other side of the segment was cut, and then the strain increased obviously.

4.2. Segment Strain of the Semi-Cutting Ring

Figure 14 shows the variation of the steel bar strain at different locations of the semi-cutting ring. Figure 14a shows the consistency of the overall changes in the strain of the steel bar at the top position of the semi-cutting ring. In the initial working condition, the external arc steel bar at the top position of the segment gradually showed a compression trend, whereas the internal arc steel bar was still under tension conditions. In the pre-support condition, the strain on the tensile and compressive sides showed a decreasing trend. In the cutting condition, the tensile and compressive strains decreased first and then increased. At this time, the steel bar strain of the external arc gradually became tensile.
Figure 14b shows that in the initial working condition, the steel bar strain of the external arc was gradually under tension conditions and it tended to be stressed by tensile to compressive conditions, but the compression was not obvious. In the pre-support condition, the strain of the internal and external arcs gradually increased because of the back support. In the cutting condition, the strain value did not change significantly. In the support-dismantling condition, the strains in the internal and external arcs varied considerably but then stabilized gradually. As the internal support system was not yet unloaded after the cutting condition, the system still provided support to the segment. Thus, the steel-ring secondary lining composite segment was stressed significantly. Therefore, when the internal support is unloaded by grading, it is necessary to wait for each unloading to be stable before proceeding to the next level of operation, to which attention should be paid in the construction operation.
Figure 15 shows the variation of the concrete strain at different locations of the semi-cutting ring. In Figure 15a, the trend of the concrete strain variation at the top of the steel-ring secondary lining composite segment was relatively consistent. In the initial condition, the concrete segment strain at the top position increased step by step with loading. In the pre-support condition, the strain value remained stable during the process and then increased continuously in a negative direction after the condition was completed. In the cutting condition, the strain was basically stable. In the support-dismantling condition, the strain value increased positively and then gradually stabilized with the load.
As can be seen from Figure 15b, the initial value of the concrete segment strain ranged from −20 to 0 με and then increased step by step with loading. In the pre-support condition, the concrete segment strain at the waist position increased first and then decreased with slight compression, and it was mainly under tension conditions in the later stage. In the cutting condition, the concrete segment strain basically became stable. In the support-dismantling condition, the strain at the waist position significantly increased before it gradually stabilized in the end.

4.3. Strain Results for the Standard Ring Segment

Figure 16 shows the steel bar strain variation at the waist position of the standard ring segment. In the initial condition, the steel bar at the waist position of the internal arc was strained gradually as the initial loading increased. The steel bar strain of the waist position of the internal and external arcs leaned toward compressive strain. During the pre-support process of the internal support, the strain fluctuated slightly at first but then stabilized after a steep increase. Overall, the strain decreased unnoticeably with the cutting construction. Additionally, the steel bar at the waist position of the external arc was strained by each stage under the initial condition. Then, the strain fluctuated at the 10th stage, with a fluctuation range of no more than 30 με. In the pre-support condition, the strain fluctuated with the alternating loading, and there appeared to be some slight increase in strain. Overall, the steel bar strain at the waist position of the external arc changed from compression to tension with cutting construction, and the compressive strain was reduced to 0.
Figure 17 shows the concrete segment strain variation at the waist position of the standard ring. In this figure, the concrete segment strain varied consistently at the waist position and the 225° direction of the standard ring. In the initial condition, the concrete was strained and the stress increased with the number of loading stages. In the pre-support condition, the concrete segment strain fluctuated slightly within a range, which was mainly related to the loading method of the internal support. This indicated that the alternate loading of the support at the top and the front and rear waist positions affected the concrete strain at the waist of the segment. In the cutting condition, with the increasing thrust of the shield machine, the concrete segment strain gradually decreased. In the support−dismantling condition, the concrete segment strain increased significantly, although it was not larger than the variation under the initial and pre-support conditions.

5. Structural Internal Force Analysis

According to the strain monitoring of each measuring point, it can be considered that the reinforcing bars of the lining structure are in an elastic state. Accordingly, the axial force N and bending moment M of the section can be calculated according to the following formulas [3]:
N = ε s E s A s + ε s E s A s + 0 h σ [ ε ( x ) ] b d x
M = ε s E s A s ε s E s A s ( h / 2 c ) 0 h σ [ ε ( x ) ] b ( x h / 2 ) d x
where εs and εs′ are the inner and outer reinforcement strains, respectively; As and As′ are the inner and outer reinforcement areas, respectively; Es and Es′ are the inner and outer reinforcement elastic modules, respectively; h, b, and c are the segment thickness, ring width, and protection layer thickness, respectively; ε(x) represents the concrete strain at the corresponding position; σ(x) represents the concrete stress determined by the concrete strain at the corresponding position.
The three-ring segment in the middle of the tunnel structure was selected as the research object. The axial force N and bending moment M of each test section under the four conditions were calculated and analyzed, as shown in Figure 18 and Figure 19, respectively.
Figure 18 shows that the internal force of the segment was redistributed after the end of the test condition and the axial force of each ring segment decreased overall. The axial force of the section near the inversion point of the cutting ring structure decreased first and then increased, and its change fluctuated greatly. The axial force at the upper spandrel position on the cutting side of the half-cutting ring increased significantly, whereas the axial force at the cross-section position near the inflection point of the structure decreased significantly. Considering the deformation and axial force variation (no more than 1000 kN) of the segment, the overall tunnel structure was in a safe state.
Figure 19 is a graph of the bending moment change. This figure shows that after the end of the test condition, the bending moments at the same test section position of each ring were basically the same. The tension and compression of the concave surface at the top and waist positions of the segment increased compared with those in the initial condition. At the position of the upper spandrel on the cutting side of the middle three rings, the bending moment decreased significantly with the cutting process. The variation was 200 kN m. The bending moment of the section near the contraflexure point of the structure changed significantly during the dismantling stage (from compression to tension). Comparing the same test sections of the cutting ring and the semi−cutting ring, the bending moment transmission between the rings was obvious, which was beneficial to the stress of the structure. During the cutting condition, the bending moment of each ring segment decreased and the axial force increased. This was beneficial to the stability of the main tunnel segment structure.

6. Conclusions

In this paper, a full-scale model test of the mechanical connection channel was conducted for the Beijing Rail Transit project. The internal force and deformation laws of the tunnel structure were studied under load–displacement simulation loading control and ground resistance. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1) In terms of the convergence deformation of the segment structure, the top and waist positions of each ring performed relatively consistently, with the maximum convergence of the top not exceeding 20 mm and the maximum convergence of the waist not exceeding 30 mm. In addition, the variation at the top of the middle three rings was small, whereas the convergence deformation of the waist position of the steel-ring secondary lining composite segment was larger than that of standard rings in the cutting construction.
(2) In terms of the strain and internal force of the segment structure, the internal force of each ring was redistributed and the axial force decreased overall during the cutting process. The bending moment at the upper spandrel position in the cutting side of the middle three rings decreased significantly with the cutting construction, and the decrement of the bending moment was larger than that of the corresponding axial force. This benefited the stability of the structure. Additionally, the section bending moment near the contraflexure point of the middle three rings changed significantly with the internal support-dismantling process, and it changed from compression to tension conditions. It has been proven that there was a significant bending moment transmission between rings, which also favored the structure stability.
(3) On the basis of the connection channel full-scale model test, it can be concluded that the mechanical method can be safely and reliably applied in the Beijing Metro construction. Additionally, compared with the existing design schemes of mechanical connection channels, the stiffness of the segment structure and support structure at the cutting position can be weakened, and the stiffness of the steel-ring secondary lining composite segment can be decreased.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.S. and X.Y.; methodology, X.S.; validation, L.F., X.S. and S.N.; formal analysis, X.Y.; investigation, Z.D.; resources, X.S.; data curation, Y.D.; writing-original draft preparation, L.F.; writing-review and editing, L.F.; visualization, S.N.; supervision, Y.Z.; project administration, X.Y.; funding acquisition, X.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

“Double Creation” Fund Project of Beijing Rail Transit Construction Management Co., Ltd. [Beijing Rail Transit Construction Management Co., Ltd.] (SCJJ2022002).

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are currently under embargo while the research findings are commercialized. Requests for data, 12 months after publication of this article, will be considered by the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declares that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. GB 50157-2013; Code for Design of Metro. China Architecture & Building Press: Beijing, China, 2013.
  2. Chen, Y.J.; Zheng, G.H. Analysis of monitoring data of freezing construction. Undergr. Eng. Tunn. 2016, 111, 23–25+55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhu, Y.H.; Dong, Z.B.; Ying, T.F.; Zhou, J.H. Exploration of micro-reinforced mechanical t-connection technology for underground space connection channel. In Proceedings of the 2017 Academic Annual Meeting of China Civil Engineering Society, Shanghai, China, 26 October 2017. [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu, X.; Gao, Y.M.; Zhang, J.L.; Zhu, Y.H. Structural response of main tunnel linings during construction of connecting aisle by means of mechanized drilling. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 2020, 42, 951–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ding, X.H. Key Techniques for Shield Construction of Metro Contact Channel. Mun. Eng. 2019, 41, 667–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, R.; Zhai, W.Z.; Ni, H.B.; Huang, H. Numerical simulation on mechanical response of tunnel portal with segment lining in mechanized construction of cross passage of shield tunnel. Tunn. Constr. 2023, 43, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wei, J.Y.; Ma, Y.Z.; Mo, Z.Z.; Li, L.; Jin, Y.F.; Ding, J. Study on influence of ground settlement in T-joint connecting passage with mechanical Pipe Jacking method: With the example of the demonstration project of T-joint construction of connecting passage with pipe jacking method in Wuxi Metro Line 3. Tunn. Constr. 2020, 40, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gui, Y.P.; Hu, X.Q.; Liu, T. Mechanical construction technology of metro connecting channel. Shanxi Arch. 2020, 46, 78–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hu, W.; Huang, Q.; Li, H.B.; Zhao, X.X. Actual measurement and numerical analysis of influence of mechanical connection channel construction on settlement of T-junction. Tunn. Constr. 2022, 51, 68–74+80. [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu, M.G.; Ma, L.Y.; Lu, P.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, R. Structural mechanical response impact of cross-passage mechanical construction on super-large diameter shield tunnel. Spec. Struct. 2021, 38, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ding, X.H.; Wen, Y.R.; Zheng, M.F.; Xiong, Y.; Zhu, Y. Analysis of seismic load response of communication channel-tunnel system constructed by mechanical method. China Civ. Eng. J. 2019, 52, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. He, B.L.; Ding, X.H.; Lang, Z.C.; Zheng, M.F.; Xiong, Y.L.; Zhu, Y.H. Dynamic response of different connection forms of mechanical connection tunnels under train loads. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 2019, 41, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, W.; Zhang, J.; Luo, J.; Lin, Y.; Zhu, Y. Risk Assessment Study on Mechanical Connecting Aisle Construction in the Bohai Mudstone Stratum with High Water Pressure. Geofluids 2022, 2022, 5694309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, W.; Li, Y.; Dong, Z.; Yang, Q. Construction applicability of mechanical methods for connecting aisle in the bohai mudstone stratum with high water pressure. Front. Earth Sci. 2023, 10, 1085327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, L.; Li, F.; Zhang, B.H.; Zhang, W.C.; Zhu, Y.H. Numerical analysis on safety of special segment structure of main tunnel in mechanical connecting aisle. Tunn. Constr. 2022, 51, 29–34. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ding, Y.; Liu, H.; Pacheco-Torgal, F.; Jalali, S. Experimental investigation on the mechanical behaviour of the fiber reinforced high-performance concrete tunnel segment. Compos. Struct. 2011, 93, 1284–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Meng, G.; Gao, B.; Zhou, J.; Cao, G.; Zhang, Q. Experimental investigation of the mechanical behavior of the steel fiber reinforced concrete tunnel segment. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 126, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, W.; Wang, J.; Jin, M.; Koizumi, A. Numerical analysis of DRC segment under inner water pressure based on full-scale test verification for shield tunnel. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2016, 56, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, W.J.; Jin, M.M.; Su, R.; Zhang, G.L.; Kong, H.; Koizumi, A. Experiment on mechanical properties steel and concrete composite segment for shield tunnel. China J. Highw. Transp. 2016, 29, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hirosawa, N.Y.; Nakashima, M.N.; Imafuku, K.; Nakayama, H.; Miyake, M.; Ishida, M.; Teshima, K.; Kinugawa, H. Development of composite concrete-packed steel segment. Nippon. Steel Tech. Rep. 2008, 97, 39–44. [Google Scholar]
  21. Liao, L.; de la Fuente, A.; Cavalaro, S.; Aguado, A. Design of FRC tunnel segments considering the ductility requirements of the Model Code 2010. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2015, 47, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Full-scale model test object. (a) Front view. (b) Lateral view (the 4th ring).
Figure 1. Full-scale model test object. (a) Front view. (b) Lateral view (the 4th ring).
Applsci 13 10375 g001
Figure 2. Sketch of point distribution and loading control of the single-ring oil cylinder. (The right picture showed the cylinder number).
Figure 2. Sketch of point distribution and loading control of the single-ring oil cylinder. (The right picture showed the cylinder number).
Applsci 13 10375 g002
Figure 3. Installation of convergence deformation meters. (a) Layout location of standard ring segments. (b) Layout location of cutting ring segments. (c) Installation of convergence deformation meters.
Figure 3. Installation of convergence deformation meters. (a) Layout location of standard ring segments. (b) Layout location of cutting ring segments. (c) Installation of convergence deformation meters.
Applsci 13 10375 g003
Figure 4. Sketch of the measuring points of the steel strain gauges. (a) Layout location of standard ring segments. (b) Layout location of cutting ring segments. (c) Installation of steel strain gauges.
Figure 4. Sketch of the measuring points of the steel strain gauges. (a) Layout location of standard ring segments. (b) Layout location of cutting ring segments. (c) Installation of steel strain gauges.
Applsci 13 10375 g004
Figure 5. Sketch of the measuring points of the concrete strain gauge. (a) Layout location of standard ring segments. (b) Layout location of cutting ring segments.
Figure 5. Sketch of the measuring points of the concrete strain gauge. (a) Layout location of standard ring segments. (b) Layout location of cutting ring segments.
Applsci 13 10375 g005
Figure 6. Sketch of internal support system.
Figure 6. Sketch of internal support system.
Applsci 13 10375 g006
Figure 7. Convergence deformations at different positions under the initial condition.
Figure 7. Convergence deformations at different positions under the initial condition.
Applsci 13 10375 g007
Figure 8. Convergence deformations at different positions under the adding internal support condition.
Figure 8. Convergence deformations at different positions under the adding internal support condition.
Applsci 13 10375 g008
Figure 9. Convergence deformations at different positions under the cutting condition.
Figure 9. Convergence deformations at different positions under the cutting condition.
Applsci 13 10375 g009
Figure 10. Convergence deformations at different positions under the dismantling condition.
Figure 10. Convergence deformations at different positions under the dismantling condition.
Applsci 13 10375 g010
Figure 11. Overall convergence deformation of the five−ring segment under all working conditions.
Figure 11. Overall convergence deformation of the five−ring segment under all working conditions.
Applsci 13 10375 g011
Figure 12. Variations of the steel bar strain for each test section.
Figure 12. Variations of the steel bar strain for each test section.
Applsci 13 10375 g012aApplsci 13 10375 g012b
Figure 13. Variation of the concrete segment strain at the top and bottom positions.
Figure 13. Variation of the concrete segment strain at the top and bottom positions.
Applsci 13 10375 g013
Figure 14. Variation of the steel bar strain at different positions.
Figure 14. Variation of the steel bar strain at different positions.
Applsci 13 10375 g014
Figure 15. Variation of the concrete strain at the top position.
Figure 15. Variation of the concrete strain at the top position.
Applsci 13 10375 g015
Figure 16. Variation of the steel bar strain at the waist position of the standard ring.
Figure 16. Variation of the steel bar strain at the waist position of the standard ring.
Applsci 13 10375 g016
Figure 17. Variation of the concrete strain at the waist position of the standard ring.
Figure 17. Variation of the concrete strain at the waist position of the standard ring.
Applsci 13 10375 g017
Figure 18. The axial force variation of the middle three rings under different conditions.
Figure 18. The axial force variation of the middle three rings under different conditions.
Applsci 13 10375 g018
Figure 19. The bending moment variation of the middle three rings under different conditions.
Figure 19. The bending moment variation of the middle three rings under different conditions.
Applsci 13 10375 g019
Table 1. Aggregation of monitoring contents and monitoring sensors.
Table 1. Aggregation of monitoring contents and monitoring sensors.
Research ObjectMonitoring ContentMonitoring DeviceMeasurement RangeMeasurement PrecisionNumber of Sensors
Overall deformation of the lining ringOverall displacementPull-line displacement meters500 mm0.01 mm15
Stress variation of the lining ringSteel strainStrain gauge20,000 με1 με424
Concrete strainStrain gauge20,000 με1 με133
Table 2. Loading of standard rings.
Table 2. Loading of standard rings.
Oil Cylinder No.Initial Load Value (kN)Final Load Value (kN)Loading of Each Level (kN)Oil Cylinder No.Initial Load Value (kN)Final Load Value (kN)Loading of Each Level (kN)
11001838.3101923721.8
2991626.3112022720.7
31001515.1121820718.9
41001515.1131011838.2
5991626.3141001626.2
62018316.3151001515.1
72020718.7161001515.1
81922720.817991626.3
92023721.718991838.4
Table 3. Loading of cutting rings.
Table 3. Loading of cutting rings.
Oil Cylinder No.Initial Load Value (kN)Final Load Value (kN)Loading of Each Level (kN)Oil Cylinder No.Initial Load Value (kN)Final Load Value (kN)Loading of Each Level (kN)
112922910101929727.8
21302037.31120284264
31301895.9122025923.9
41281896.11312122910.8
51292037.4141392037.4
612822910.1151271896.2
72025923.9161301895.9
82128426.3171302037.3
92029727.71812922910
Table 4. Overall convergence deformation of the five−ring segment under all working conditions (unit: mm).
Table 4. Overall convergence deformation of the five−ring segment under all working conditions (unit: mm).
Working ConditionConvergence DeformationSecond RingThird RingFourth Ring Fifth Ring Sixth Ring
Initial conditionTop position16.3616.2716.3316.1816.61
Waist position15.2515.1516.7915.6421.66
Dismantling conditionTop position18.4217.4817.8516.7614.36
Waist position20.0620.6129.63
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fan, L.; Sun, X.; Ye, X.; Niu, S.; Dong, Z.; Deng, Y.; Zhu, Y. Full-Scale Model Test of Subway Contact Channel under Mechanical Construction. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 10375. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810375

AMA Style

Fan L, Sun X, Ye X, Niu S, Dong Z, Deng Y, Zhu Y. Full-Scale Model Test of Subway Contact Channel under Mechanical Construction. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(18):10375. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810375

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fan, Liping, Xibo Sun, Xinfeng Ye, Shuai Niu, Zibo Dong, Yuebao Deng, and Yaohong Zhu. 2023. "Full-Scale Model Test of Subway Contact Channel under Mechanical Construction" Applied Sciences 13, no. 18: 10375. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810375

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop