Next Article in Journal
A Robust Controller for Upper Limb Rehabilitation Exoskeleton
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Selected Parameters for Determining the Internal Quality of White Grape Cultivars Grown in Cold Climates
Previous Article in Journal
Research of Strength, Frost Resistance, Abrasion Resistance and Shrinkage of Steel Fiber Concrete for Rigid Highways and Airfields Pavement Repair
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tuning Potassium Fertilization to Improve pH and Acidity in Glera Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) under a Warming Climate
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/app12031177
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analyses of Xylem Vessel Size on Grapevine Cultivars and Relationship with Incidence of Esca Disease, a Threat to Grape Quality

by
Renzo Foglia
†,
Lucia Landi
† and
Gianfranco Romanazzi
*
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, I-60131 Ancona, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Renzo Foglia and Lucia Landi share co-first authorship.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(3), 1177; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031177
Submission received: 2 January 2022 / Revised: 17 January 2022 / Accepted: 18 January 2022 / Published: 23 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Vineyard and Grape Quality Management)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Featured Application

This work provides a reference support to further test the hypothesis that Vitis vinifera cultivars with wide xylem vessels may be more susceptible to esca disease and opens the way to alternative cultural practices and disease management strategies.

Abstract

Esca disease is one of the most important grapevine trunk diseases. It seriously reduces the quality and quantity of grapevine production, and results in a shorter vineyard lifespan. Previous studies have suggested that wide xylem vessel diameter favours development on grapevine of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora, one of the fungi involved in esca, thus affecting disease susceptibility. In this study, cultivars mainly originated from European countries, 27 white-berried and 24 red-berried grapevine cultivars, were grown in the same experimental vineyard and were analysed for xylem vessel sizes (as diameter and frequency) for correlation with esca incidence. In this study, the cultivars showed significant differences in the xylem vessel parameters. However, no relationship was detected between vessel size and esca incidence in the field. Overall, white-berried cultivars showed wider vessel diameters than red-berried cultivars. The relationship between xylem vessel size in the red-berried and white-berried cultivars and incidence of esca symptoms is discussed. We suggest that vessel anatomy profiles can provide useful information for further investigations on grapevine genotype structure–esca incidence relationships.

1. Introduction

In commercial grapevine (Vitis vinifera) growing, vascular diseases (e.g., Eutypa dieback, Botryosphaeria dieback, and esca) are the major factors that can limit crop productivity, fruit quality and vineyard longevity [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The causal agents are a set of taxonomically unrelated fungi, which include Eutypa lata, Phaeoacremonium minimum (syn. P. aleophilum), Phaeomoniella chlamydospora, Diplodia seriata and Neofusicoccum parvum, as some of the most virulent and widespread [8,9,10,11,12,13].
Grapevines become infected primarily through pruning wounds [14], either in nurseries during the propagation phase [3] or in vineyards after planting in infested soils. These types of infection have been confirmed through P. chlamydospora, providing evidence that this pathogen is also soilborne [15]. Field observations indicate that to date there are no known grapevine cultivars that are resistant to these vascular diseases [5]. Therefore, the degrees of susceptibility range from highly susceptible to low susceptibility [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Usually, in plant genotypes that are more tolerant to vascular diseases, despite pathogen colonisation, the disease symptoms are less severe than in sensitive genotypes. This suggests that tolerant plants can neutralise the effects of virulence factors produced by these pathogens [25]. This affects the colonisation of the host by spores transported in the xylem by the sap flow and hyphal growth. These hosts that are more tolerant to pathogens rapidly compensate for the loss of xylem vessels due to pathogen compartmentalisation, by differentiating new functional vessels to maintain sufficient stem water conductivity, which might also explain the tolerance to wilt diseases [26,27]. In esca, which involves the woody tissues, the plant host can contain the spread of the pathogen through reduction of the spatial lumen of the plant xylem vessels, or by production of gels and development of tyloses that occlude the vessels and entrap the pathogen [27,28]. A spatiotemporal model of compartmentalisation of vascular wilt fungi in vessels has been hypothesised for annual plants, including tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and cotton (Gossypium spp.) [25]. Among perennial crops, it was observed that in Ulmus genotypes affected by Dutch elm disease, which is a wilt disease caused by Ophiostoma novo–ulmi (C.M. Brasier) [29], the diameter of the xylem vessels has an important role in resistance to this wilt disease, whereby susceptible hosts have higher proportions of vessels of wide diameters, compared to resistant genotypes [30,31]. More recent studies have been carried out on xylem characteristics of avocado cultivars from Guatemalan, Mexican and West Indian botanical breeds susceptible to laurel wilt. These studies evidenced that avocado West Indian race wilt with a larger vessel diameter, and consequently a greater potential hydraulic conductivity, are more susceptible to laurel wilt [32]. Preliminary investigation of Pierce’s disease of grape evidenced that two red-berried cultivars, ‘Merlot’ and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’, from the occidentalis prole group, exhibited less disease symptoms and minor xylem vessel dimensions versus white-berried Thompson Seedless cultivar from the orientalis prole group [33]. In grapevine cultivars, the amounts of inoculated P. chlamydospora and the necrotic lesion lengths correlated with vessel size [34]. Then, using the grapevine as a model system, it was demonstrated that vessel diameter is a key determinant of the timing of their occlusion. [35,36]. Thus, it was suggested that xylem vessel diameter affects disease susceptibility in grapevine, to potentially explain the differences between the highly susceptible and tolerant hosts to esca disease [34,37]. However, the xylem anatomical properties linked to grapevine genotypes need to be investigated further to confirm such a xylem vessel size–esca relationship.
The goal of this study was to investigate the xylem vessel properties, such as vessel size and frequency, in 51 grapevine cultivars, 27 white-berried and 24 red-berried cultivars of V. vinifera of Italian national and international interest, with known average values of disease incidence in the field. The correlation of these anatomical properties with disease incidence was also investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling Site

The experimental trial was performed in an experimental vineyard located in Carassai (AP), at 158 m a.s.l., in the central Italy Marche region (43°02′18.07″ N; 13°39′39.41″ E) of the Agency for Services in the Agro-Food Sector of Marche Region (ASSAM). The vineyard was planted in 1989. The grapevines were grafted onto Kober 5BB rootstock (Vitis berlandieri × V. riparia) and were grown under the cordon training system. Plants were grown on a slight and uniform slope along the hill. The plants were spaced at 3 m between rows and 1 m within rows. All the cultivars grown in the experimental vineyard had been examined for esca incidence according to visual inspections in 2008, based on the formula: disease incidence (DI) I = (n/N) × 100, where “n” represents symptomatic plants, and “N” is the total number of plants [22].

2.2. Experiment Setup

In order to identify both the numbers of plants and wood stems from a 1-year-old initial productive spur (cordon) useful to gain significant results and maintain grapevine productivity, the experiment was set up. Therefore, in February 2017, during the dormancy period, the red-berried ‘Montepulciano’ and white-berried ‘Passerina’ V. vinifera cultivars were selected. The two cultivars showed plants with the same vigour. From each cultivar, five different plants were selected in five different areas on each block, and from each plant, three cordons were cut from the base and taken to the laboratory. Each stem contained 2–3 internodes and measured 8–15 mm in diameter and 30–50 mm in length. The middle internode position on the stem was used to measure vessel size.

2.3. Assessment of Xylem Vessel Diameter and Frequency

Measurements of tangential diameter and frequency of the vessels were performed on stem cross-sections, as described by [38]. For each segment, 5 mm internode fragments were fixed in a formaldehyde/ acetic acid/ ethyl alcohol (FAA) solution (5/5/9; Sigma–Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) for 48 h at 4 °C, and then rinsed in deionised water and stored at 4°C in 80% ethanol. The cross-sections (100 µm thick) were made using a cryostat microtome (MICROM HM 505 E) at −25°C, and then stained with 0.05% Toluidine O solution, pH 4.3 (Sigma–Aldrich). Measurements of vessel diameters and vessel densities were taken under an upright light microscope (Leica Microsystems CMS GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) at 4× magnification, equipped with a digital camera (Leica Microsystems CMS GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), and using the application ruler of the X-Entry software (Alexasoft, Florence, Italy). For each section, the number of vessels and vessel densities were determined according to an automatic software grid measuring 1 mm2 positioned on the dorsoventral symmetry axis, (Alexasoft, Florence, Italy) (Figure 1). Tangential vessel diameters were calculated by measuring the average of the minimum and maximum diameters for each vessel considering at last 35 vessels from each stem, then 105 from each plant for a total of 525 vessels from each cultivar. Vessel density was calculated according to three cross-sections per stem and nine per plant by counting the average number of vessels per 1 mm2.

2.4. Experimental Trial

After preliminary test, in mid-February 2018 the xylem vessels size and density were investigated in 51 cultivars of V. vinifera, of which 24 were red-berried and 27 white-berried (Supplementary Table S1). Most of the cultivars, based on Vitis International Variety Catalogue VIVC [39], were originated from European countries, including Italy, France, Germany and the Balkans; while one cultivar each from South Africa and Slovenia was included. From each cultivar, five different plants were selected, and from each plant, one wood segment was cut from a 1-year-old initial cordon. The section of each stem (5 mm internode fragment) was processed as previously described. Then, after fixing the fragments, the tangential vessel density was calculated according to three cross-sections per plant, and the diameter was assessed for at least 120 vessels per cultivar. Nine diameter classes, in 20 µm steps, were considered: 40–59 µm, 60–79 µm, 80–99 µm, 100–119 µm, 120–139 µm, 140–159 µm, 160–179 µm, 180–199 µm, and finally, >200 µm, as modified from [34]. The frequency of each diameter class was determined using Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). None of the cross-sections considered in the survey showed the presence of gels, tyloses, gums or other elements that are typical of vessels with occluded lumens.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data collected related to tangential vessel diameters (per each cultivar, n = 525 vessel sections in the preliminary test and n = 120 vessel sections in the experimental trial, were analysed), vessel densities (per each cultivar, n = 45 vessel sections in the preliminary test were analysed) and vessel densities for the different diameter classes (per each cultivar, n = 15 vessel sections in the experimental trial were analysed). The data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by multiple comparisons of means, using Fisher’s protected least significant difference (LSD) tests, at p ≤ 0.05 (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK, USA). Finally, the datasets were tested for correlations using Pearson’s coefficient (r), at p < 0.05 (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Experiment Setup

The preliminary investigation showed, for both ‘Montepulciano’ and ‘Passerina’ cultivars, high vessel diameter variability among plants but not among basal segments collected from each plant (Figure 2A,B). The vessel diameter average values were 95.2 µm for ‘Passerina’ and 73.2 µm for ‘Montepulciano’ cultivars (Figure 2C). This result highlighted high variability in vessel size among the plants of each cultivar; however, the significant differences detected between the two cultivars shown that 5 plants could be enough for vessel dimension and density investigations. Then, the non-significant difference among the vessel dimensions from three wood-stem 1-year-old initial cordons, suggested one wood stem could be representative of xylem vessel dimensions in each plant. This allowed us to preserve plants for grape production.

3.2. Vessel Diameter

High vessel diameter variability was recorded across all of the grapevine cultivars (Figure 3).
Red-berried cultivars—Related to the mean of all vessel diameter measurements from each grape cultivar, the ‘Nebbiolo’ showed the largest vessel diameter (152.9 µm), followed by ‘Limberger’ (123.4 µm). Conversely, ‘Balsamina’ and ‘Montepulciano’ showed the smallest diameters, at 75.4 µm and 70.6 µm, respectively. All of the other cultivars showed intermediate diameters (Figure 4).
White-berried cultivars—In this group, the vessel diameters ranged from 160.4 µm for ‘Sauvignon Blanc’ R2 to 81.9 µm for ‘Garofanata’. All of the other cultivars showed intermediate diameters (Figure 5).

3.3. Vessel Density and Number of Vessels per Diameter

The density and frequency of xylem vessel size classes differed according to the cultivar. Vessel density was quantified as the average number of vessels per 1 mm2.
Red-berried cultivars—The ‘Montepulciano’ cultivar showed the highest value for vessel density (60.0 vessels mm−2), while ‘Aleatico 83/c2’ showed the lowest value (28.7 vessels mm−2). In the other cultivars, intermediate values were found, with high variability among the cultivars (Figure 6). For the vessel size frequency, in the red-berried cultivars, the most representative diameter classes were 60–79 µm and 80–99 µm. However, some cultivars showed the highest diameter classes, such as ‘Sangiovese’ SG11 (7.3 vessels), ‘Trebbiano rosso’ TR71 (6.2 vessels), ‘Limberger’ (4.6 vessels) and ‘Syrah’ (5.8 vessels), where the vessels were included in the 100–119 µm class, and ‘Pinot nero’ (5.2 vessels) and ‘Nebbiolo’ (6.8 vessels), where the vessels were included in the >200 µm class. Other cultivars showed lower diameter classes, such as ‘Montepulciano’ (7.8 vessels), ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ (6.3 vessels), ‘Pinotage’ (5.2 vessels) and ‘Egidiola’ (8.2 vessels), which showed vessels in the 40–59 µm class (Figure 6).
White-berried cultivars—In this group of cultivars, the highest vessel density was observed in ‘Garofanata’ (46.7 vessels mm−2), followed by ‘Chiapparù’ (43.0 vessels mm−2), while the lowest was observed for ‘Sauvignon Blanc’ R2 (18.3 vessels mm−2). All of the other cultivars had intermediate values (Figure 7).
For the vessel size distribution, the most representative classes for most of the cultivars ranged from 80–99 µm to 100–119 µm. However, except for ‘Garofanata’ with 10.3 vessels in the 60–79 µm class, a number of cultivars showed greater vessel sizes corresponding to different classes. In detail, some cultivars showed vessel sizes corresponding to the 120–139 µm class, such as ‘Sauvignon Blanc’ R2 (5.4 vessels), ‘Viogner’ (5.6 vessels), ‘Trebbiano’ SC TR12 (10.3 vessels) and ‘Verdicchio’ SC VE23 (7.8 vessels). Other cultivars showed vessel sizes that corresponded to the 140–159 µm class, such as ‘Sauvignon Blanc’ R2 (5.4 vessels), ‘Roussanne’ (9.0 vessels) and ‘Grechetto’ T (6.2 vessels). In the 160–179 µm class, there were ‘Viogner’ (5.6 vessels) and ‘Falanghina’ (5.2 vessels). Finally, in the >200 µm class, ‘Sauvignon Blanc R2’ (5.4 vessels) and ‘Greco’ (8.3 vessels) were observed (Figure 7).
Correlations between vessel anatomical characteristics and disease incidence detected on the same plants by [22] were investigated. For the red-berried cultivars, a negative correlation coefficient was found between vessel diameter and vessel density (r = −0.666) (Figure 8A) while the correlation was weak between vessel diameter and disease incidence (r = −0.4451) (Figure 8B), and between disease incidence and vessel density (r = 0.56195) (Figure 8C). For the white-berried cultivars, a negative correlation coefficient was observed between vessel diameter and vessel density (r = −0.8577) (Figure 8D), while a weak correlation was observed between vessel diameter and disease incidence (r = 0.13588) (Figure 8E), and between disease incidence and vessel density (r = −0.2779) (Figure 8F).

3.4. Comparisons among Red-Berried and White-Berried Cultivars

Vessel diameter and vessel density—The comparison between red-berried and white-berried cultivars highlighted significant differences between the two groups. The vessel diameter average values were 121.9 µm for white-berried and 97.0 µm for red-berried cultivars (Figure 9A). Regarding the vessel density, red-berried cultivars showed a higher density in comparison with the white-berried cultivars, with 42.8 vessels mm−2 and 31.0 vessels mm−2, respectively (Figure 9A).
Disease incidence—A similar trend was observed among the red-berried and white-berried cultivars relative to the overall disease incidence observed for the same cultivars, where the average disease incidence, as assessed by [22], was higher in the white-berried cultivars (14.2%) than in the red-berried cultivars (10.5%) (Figure 9B).

4. Discussion

Esca and other grapevine trunk diseases are one of the major limiting factors for grape production throughout the world [40]. In esca, which affects the trunk vascular tissues, information about the morphology of the xylem among grapevine cultivars will allow better understanding of the mechanisms of vascular pathogens. Previous studies have shown that the xylem vessel diameter differs among grapevine cultivars, and that these features might predict the degree of susceptibility of any given cultivar to vascular diseases [37]. Applying the methodologies used by [38], we investigated the main anatomical traits in xylem vessels in a wide range of grapevine genotypes, as 24 red-berried and 27 white-berried cultivars with Italian national and international importance in viticulture. Some of these are spread worldwide, as reported by the International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV) [41]. The information gained here provides novel knowledge about the anatomical characteristics of xylem tissue in grapevine cultivars. In particular, our data showed high variability in both vessel diameter and vessel density within and among red-berried and white-berried cultivars grown in the field, emphasizing that the vessel dimensions can be affected by cultivar characteristics. The differences in vessel sizes and frequencies observed among the grapevine cultivars were in agreement with data reported in previous studies, which involved small numbers of cultivars grown in greenhouses. In particular, we observed similar vessel densities for the same cultivars previously analysed, i.e., ‘Merlot’, ‘Chardonnay’ and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ [34,37].
However, it should be emphasized that several studies carried out in a list of species have showed that the variation in xylem vessel size within genotypes changed across different environments [42,43,44,45,46]. These investigations showed that smaller vessels are advantageous to avoid freezing-induced embolism and to minimise the impact of drought-induced cavitation. In peach rootstock, larger vessel sizes were found in the more vigorous rootstock than in the most dwarfing rootstock, and these characteristics were associated with the different hydraulic conductances estimated among these rootstocks [47]. Seasonal variations in vessel diameter are highly plastic and change with summer moisture availability, affecting plant growth [48,49]. However, several comparative studies underline that conductive path length is by far the main driver of variation in mean vessel diameter, suggesting that basipetal vessel size provides a useful methodological means of standardizing samples [50,51]. The present study analysed a large number of cultivars grown on the same experimental field, grafted onto the same rootstock, and trained with the same trellis system. For this reason, we can assume that external environmental factors, such as agricultural practices and soil and weather conditions, did not affect the results, which could instead be associated with grapevine genotypes. Interestingly, in this study, different distributions for the diameter classes were observed. In particular, there was a higher average vessel diameter in the white-berried cultivars compared to the average value detected in the red-berried cultivars. As might be predicted, a negative correlation was observed among the vessel diameters and vessel densities in both the white-berried and red-berried cultivars. Moreover, the lowest correlation coefficient was observed for the red-berried cultivars, which suggests less uniformity among this group regarding vessel size. To the best of our knowledge, the xylem anatomical properties associated with red-berried and white-berried cultivars represent new information in the field. However, further studies are needed to confirm these data and understand whether this anatomical feature has an important role in plant physiology or in plant–pathogen interactions. In this study we examined the relationship between these characteristics and incidence of esca symptoms, as previously assessed by [22] in the same experimental field for the same grapevine cultivars. For the relationships among vessel sizes and densities with esca incidence previously detected on the same grapevines, no linear relationship was observed for either the red-berried or white-berried cultivars. Previous investigation indicated that cultivars with larger vessels might be more susceptible to inoculated P. chlamydospora [34], one of the putative agents of esca, according to both pathogen concentration and wood necrosis lesions. In the present study, we referred to the esca symptoms observed in the field, which are known to involve several fungal species [5,11,52]. On the other hand, sometimes the presence of pathogens involved in esca was not resolved after the manifestation of symptoms. Grapevine trunk diseases have unpredictable discontinuity in the expression of foliar symptoms year by year [2,8,53,54]. Even after their first appearance, foliar symptoms do not develop systematically and cannot be predicted from year to year, which indicates that several factors, including the type of rootstock and environmental factors, are probably involved in their development [5]. However, a correspondence with esca susceptibility in some cultivars occurred in several works. The highest esca incidence was reported for ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’, ‘Sangiovese’, and ‘Sauvignon Blanc’, with lower incidence for ‘Montepulciano’ ‘Merlot’ and ‘Chardonnay’, [22,23,55,56]. Recent study yielded evidence that parenchyma cells play an active role during esca pathogenesis, expanding into the vessel lumen, secreting extracellular compounds, and eventually occluding the vessel, but no positive correlation between the severity of esca leaf symptoms and leaf vascular occlusions was observed. The authors suggested that symptom development was associated with vascular occlusions that are likely elicited at a distance from the pathogen niche localized in the trunk [57]. In our work, the overall average value of vessel diameter measured among the red-berried and white-berried cultivars showed that the white-berried cultivars have larger vessel sizes than the red-berried cultivars. A similar trend was observed among the red-berried and white-berried cultivars relative to the overall disease incidence observed by [22]. Then, although no significant relationship between disease incidence and xylem vessel dimensions was observed for the singular cultivars, the average values suggest a greater susceptibility of the white-berried cultivars that, according to our investigation, showed larger xylem vessel dimensions. Further investigations including a greater number of cultivars will be needed to verify this relationship. In this regard, the OIV [58] reported that in Italy the incidence of trunk disease depends on the varietal susceptibility: on plants of 15 to 18 years, corresponding to the age of plants analysed in this work, the average incidence can fluctuate from around 12% to 19% for the white-berried cultivars, and around 8% to 10% for the red-berried cultivars [23,59]. This suggests that some relationship among vessel dimensions and esca incidence might exist.

5. Conclusions

Our data represent a first step that can be useful for understanding the anatomical characteristics of the xylem of several grapevine cultivars. We have shown that there is a difference among cultivars regarding the size of xylem vessels in which the causal agents of esca develop, thus spreading the disease. The overall data detected in our study are interesting when compared in general with the incidence of the disease and represent important information, especially because this research involved a considerable number of grape cultivars. In esca, as for other trunk diseases, for the control of the diffusion of fungal pathogens in host tissues, the planting of cultivars resistant to wilt diseases remains one of the most durable and economically efficient control measures [28]. Our screening of vessel size properties linked to sensitivity of grapevine cultivars to esca disease can be useful for application innovative monitoring tools for identification of symptomatic plants in the vineyard [60]. For this reason, it becomes increasingly important to better understand the plant defence mechanisms and identify the less susceptible genotypes within the existing germplasms. These are key elements for sustainable agriculture.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/app12031177/s1, Table S1. The list of cultivars analysed in this study including geographic origin from Vitis International Variety Catalogue database (www.vivc.de) [39].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.R. and L.L.; methodology, R.F., L.L. and G.R.; software, L.L. and R.F.; funding acquisition, G.R.; validation, R.F., L.L. and G.R.; formal analysis, L.L. and R.F.; investigation, L.L. and R.F.; data curation, L.L. and R.F.; supervision, G.R.; writing—original draft preparation, L.L. and R.F.; writing—review and editing, L.L. and G.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the project “Understanding of epidemiology of esca disease” of Marche Polytechnic University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Thanks are expressed to the project “Understanding of epidemiology of esca disease” funded by Marche Polytechnic University. Useful discussion with colleagues at meetings helped us to clarify the presentation of our results, and it is acknowledged and appreciated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Munkvold, G.P.; Duthie, J.A.; Marois, J.J. Reductions in yield and vegetative growth of grapevines due to Eutypa dieback. Phytopathology 1994, 84, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mugnai, L.; Graniti, A.; Surico, G. Esca (Black measles) and brown wood-streaking: Two old and elusive diseases of grapevines. Plant Dis. 1999, 83, 404–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Gramaje, D.; Armengol, J. Fungal trunk pathogens in the grapevine propagation process: Potential inoculum sources; detection; identification; and management strategies. Plant Dis. 2011, 95, 1040–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Lorrain, B.; Ky, I.; Pasquier, G.; Jourdes, M.; Dubrana, L.G.; Gény, L.; Rey, P.; Donèche, B.; Trissedre, P.L. Effect of esca disease on the phenolic and sensory attributes of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes; musts and wines. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2012, 18, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bertsch, C.; Ramirez-Suero, M.; Magnin-Robert, M.; Larignon, P.; Chong, J.; Abou-Mansour, A.E.; Spagnolo, C.; Fontaine, F. Grapevine trunk diseases: Complex and still poorly understood. Plant Pathol. 2013, 62, 243–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Guerin-Dubrana, L.; Fontaine, F.; Mugnai, L. Grapevine trunk disease in European and Mediterranean vineyards: Occurrence, distribution and associated disease-affecting cultural factors. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2019, 58, 49–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sosnowski, M.R.; Ayres, M.R.; Scott, E.S. The influence of water deficit stress on the grapevine trunk disease pathogens Eutypa lata and Diplodia seriata. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 2217–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Romanazzi, G.; Murolo, S.; Pizzichini, L.; Nardi, S. Esca in young and mature vineyards; and molecular diagnosis of the associated fungi. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2009, 125, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Urbez-Torres, J.R. The status of Botryosphaeriaceae species infecting grapevines. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2011, 50, S5–S45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Travadon, R.; Baumgartner, K.; Rolshausen, P.E.; Gubler, W.D.; Sosnowski, M.R.; Lecomte, P.; Halleen, F.; Péros, J.-P. Genetic structure of the fungal grapevine pathogen Eutypa lata from four continents. Plant Pathol. 2012, 61, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Úrbez-Torres, J.R.; Haag, P.; Bowen, P.; O’Gorman, D.T. Grapevine trunk diseases in British Columbia: Incidence and characterization of the fungal pathogens associated with esca and Petri diseases of grapevine. Plant Dis. 2014, 98, 456–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Gramaje, D.; Mostert, L.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. Phaeoacremonium: From esca disease to phaeohyphomycosis. Fungal Biol. 2015, 119, 759–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. González-Domínguez, E.; Berlanas, C.; Gramaje, D.; Armengol, J.; Rossi, V.; Berbegal, M. Temporal dispersal patterns of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora, causal agent of Petri disease and esca in vineyards. Phytopathology 2020, 110, 1216–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rolshausen, P.E.; Urbez-Torres, J.R.; Rooney-Latham, S.; Eskalen, A.; Smith, R.J.; Gubler, W.D. Evaluation of pruning wound susceptibility and protection against fungi associated with grapevine trunk diseases. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2010, 61, 113–119. [Google Scholar]
  15. Agustí-Brisach, C.; Gramaje, D.; Garcia-Jimenez, J.; Armengol, J. Detection of black-foot and Petri disease pathogens in soils of grapevine nurseries and vineyards using bait plants. Plant Soil 2013, 364, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Péros, J.P.; Berger, G. A rapid method to assess the aggressiveness of Eutypa lata isolates and the susceptibility of grapevine cultivar to Eutypa dieback. Agronomie 1994, 14, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Feliciano, A.J.; Eskalen, A.; Gubler, W.D. Differential susceptibility of three grapevine cultivars to Phaeoacremonium aleophilum and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora in California. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2004, 43, 66–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Christen, D.; Schonmann, S.; Jermini, M.; Strasser, R.J.; Defago, G. Characterization and early detection of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) stress responses to esca disease in situ chlorophyll fluorescence and comparison with drought stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 60, 504–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Landi, L.; Murolo, S.; Romanazzi, G. Colonization of Vitis spp. wood by sGFP-transformed Phaeomoniella chlamydospore, a tracheomycotic fungus involved in esca disease. Phytopathology 2012, 102, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bruez, E.; Lecomte, P.; Grosman, J.; Doublet, B.; Bertsch, C.; Fontaine, F.; Ugaglia, A.; Trissedre, P.-L.; Da Costa, J.-P.; Guerin-Dubrana, L.; et al. Overview of grapevine trunk diseases in France in the 2000s. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2013, 52, 262–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Travadon, R.; Rolshausen, P.E.; Gubler, W.D.; Cadle-Davidson, L.; Baumgartner, K. Susceptibility of cultivated and wild Vitis spp. to wood infection by fungal trunk pathogens. Plant Dis. 2013, 97, 1529–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Murolo, S.; Romanazzi, G. Effects of grapevine cultivar; rootstock and clone on esca disease. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2014, 43, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Borgo, M.; Pegoraro, G.; Sartori, E. Susceptibility of grape varieties to esca disease. In Proceedings of the 39th World Congress of Vine and Wine BIO Web of Conferences, Bento Gonçalves, Brazil, 24–28 October 2016; Volume 7, p. 01041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Martínez-Diz, M.P.; Díaz-Losada, E.; Barajas, E.; Ruano-Rosa, D.; Andrés-Sodupe, M.; Gramaje, D. Screening of Spanish Vitis vinifera germplasm for resistance to Phaeomoniella chlamydospora. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 246, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Beckman, C.H.; Roberts, E.M. On the nature and genetic basis for resistance and tolerance to fungal wilt diseases of plants. Adv. Bot. Res. 1995, 21, 35–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Talboys, P.W. Resistance to vascular wilt fungi. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. Biol. Sci. 1972, 181, 319–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fradin, E.F.; Thomma, B.P.H.J. Physiology and molecular aspects of Verticillium wilt diseases caused by V. dahliae and V. albo-atrum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2006, 7, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yadeta, K.; Thomma, B.P.H.J. The xylem as battleground for plant hosts and vascular wilt pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Brasier, C.M. Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. nov. causative agent of current Dutch elm disease pandemics. Mycopathologia 1991, 115, 51–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Solla, A.; Gil, L. Xylem vessel diameter as a factor in resistance of Ulmus minor to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. For. Pathol. 2002, 32, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Venturas, M.; Lopez, R.; Martin, J.A.; Gasco, A.; Gil, L. Heritability of Ulmus minor resistance to Dutch elm disease and its relationship to vessel size, but not to xylem vulnerability to drought. Plant Pathol. 2014, 63, 500–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Beier, G.L.; Lund, C.D.; Held, B.W.; Ploetz, R.C.; Konkol, J.L.; Blanchette, R.A. Variation in xylem characteristics of botanical races of Persea americana and their potential influence on susceptibility to the pathogen Raffaelea lauricola. Trop. Plant Pathol. 2020, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Deyett, E.; Pouzoulet, J.; Yang, J.I.; Ashworth, V.E.; Castro, C.; Roper, M.C.; Rolshausen, P.E. Assessment of Pierce’s disease susceptibility in Vitis vinifera cultivars with different pedigrees. Plant Pathol. 2019, 68, 1079–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Pouzoulet, J.; Scudiero, E.; Schiavon, M.; Rolshausen, P.E. Xylem vessel diameter affects the compartmentalization of the vascular pathogen Phaeomoniella chlamydospora in grapevine. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Pouzoulet, J.; Scudiero, E.; Schiavon, M.; Santiago, L.S.; Rolshausen, P.E. Modeling of xylem vessel occlusion in grapevine. Tree Physiol. 2019, 39, 1438–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pouzoulet, J.; Rolshausen, P.E.; Charbois, R.; Chen, J.; Guillaumie, S.; Ollat, N.; Gambetta, G.A.; Delmas, C.E.L. Behind the curtain of the compartmentalization process: Exploring how xylem vessel diameter impacts vascular pathogen resistance. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 43, 2782–2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pouzoulet, J.; Pivovaroff, A.L.; Santiago, L.S.; Rolshausen, P.E. Can vessel dimension explain tolerance toward fungal vascular wilt diseases in woody plants? Lessons from Dutch elm disease and esca disease in grapevine. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Scholz, A.; Klepsch, M.; Karimi, Z.; Jansen, S. How to quantify conduits in wood? Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Maul, E.; Sudharma, K.N.; Ganesch, A.; Brühl, U.; Hundemer, M.; Kecke, S.; Mahler-Ries, A.; Marx, G.; Schreiber, T.; Walk, M.; et al. 30 years VIVC—Vitis International Variety Catalogue. In Proceedings of the XI International Conference on Grapevine Breeding and Genetics, Beijing, China, 28 July–2 August 2014; Available online: www.vivc.de (accessed on 11 November 2021).
  40. Mohammadi, H.; Banihashemi, Z.; Gramaje, D.; Armengol, J. Fungal pathogens associated with grapevine trunk diseases in Iran. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2013, 15, 137–150. [Google Scholar]
  41. Distribution of the World’s Grapevine Varieties. In International Organization of Vine and Wine (OIV) Focus OIV 2017; OIV (Ed.) OIV: Paris, France, 2017; ISBN 9791091799898. [Google Scholar]
  42. Fisher, J.B.; Goldstein, G.; Jones, T.J.; Cordell, S. Wood vessel diameter is related to elevation and genotype in the Hawaiian tree Metrosideros polymorpha (Myrtaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2007, 94, 709–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Choat, B.; Medek, D.E.; Stuart, S.A.; Pasquet-Kok, J.; Egerton, J.J.; Salari, H.; Sack, L.; Ball, L.C. Xylem traits mediate a trade-off between resistance to freeze-thaw-induced embolism and photosynthetic capacity in overwintering evergreens. New Phytol. 2011, 191, 996–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Schreiber, S.G.; Hamann, A.; Hacke, U.G.; Thomas, B.R. Sixteen years of winter stress: An assessment of cold hardiness; growth performance and survival of hybrid poplar clones at a boreal planting site. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Medeiros, J.S.; Pockman, W.T. Freezing regime and trade-offs with water transport efficiency generate variation in xylem structure across diploid populations of Larrea sp. (Zygophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2014, 101, 598–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Palliotti, A.; Tombesi, S.; Frioni, T.; Famiani, F.; Silvestroni, O.; Zamboni, M.; Poni, S. Morpho-structural and physiological response of container-grown Sangiovese and Montepulciano cvv. (Vitis vinifera) to re-watering after a pre-veraison limiting water deficit. Funct. Plant Biol. 2014, 41, 634–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Tombesi, S.; Johnson, R.S.; Day, K.R.; De Jong, T.M. Relationships between xylem vessel characteristics; calculated axial hydraulic conductance and size-controlling capacity of peach rootstocks. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Schreiber, S.G.; Hacke, U.G.; Hamann, A. Variation of xylem vessel diameters across a climate gradient: Insight from a reciprocal transplant experiment with a widespread boreal tree. Funct. Ecol. 2015, 29, 1392–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Qaderi, M.M.; Martel, A.B.; Dixon, S.L. Environmental factors influence plant vascular system and water regulation. Plants 2019, 8, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Rosell, J.A.; Olson, M.E.; Anfodillo, T. Scaling of xylem vessel diameter with plant size: Causes, predictions, and outstanding questions. Curr. For. Rep. 2017, 3, 46–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fajardo, A.; Martınez-Perez, C.; Cervantes-Alcayde, M.A.; Olson, M.E. Stem length, not climate, controls vessel diameter in two trees species across a sharp precipitation gradient. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 2347–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bruno, G.; Sparapano, L. Effects of three esca-associated fungi on Vitis vinifera L.: V. Changes in the chemical and biological profile of xylem sap from diseased cv. Sangiovese vines. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2007, 71, 210–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Surico, G.; Marchi, G.; Braccini, P.; Mugnai, L. Epidemiology of esca in some vineyards in Tuscany (Italy). Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2000, 39, 190–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wagschal, I.; Abou-Mansour, E.; Petit, A.N.; Clément, C.; Fontaine, F. Wood Diseases of Grapevine: A Review on Eutypa Dieback and Esca. In Plant–Microbe Interactions; Ait Barka, E., Clément, C., Eds.; Research Signpost: Kerala, India, 2008; pp. 367–391. [Google Scholar]
  55. Marchi, M. Susceptibility to esca of various grapevine (Vitis vinifera) cultivars grafted on different rootstocks in a vineyard in the province of Siena (Italy). Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2001, 40, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Quaglia, M.; Covarelli, L.; Zazzerini, A. Epidemiological survey on esca disease in Umbria, central Italy. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2009, 48, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bortolami, G.; Gambetta, G.A.; Delzon, S.; Lamarque, L.J.; Pouzoulet, J.; Badel, E.; Burlett, R.; Charrier, G.; Cochard, H.; Dayer, S.; et al. Exploring the Hydraulic Failure Hy-pothesis of Esca Leaf Symptom Formation. Plant Physiol. 2019, 181, 1163–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Grapevine Trunk Diseases. A Review. In International Organization of Vine and Wine (OIV), 1st ed.; OIV (Ed.) OIV: Paris, France, 2016; ISBN 9791091799607. [Google Scholar]
  59. Mondello, V.; Songy, A.; Battiston, E.; Pinto, C.; Coppin, C.; Trotel-Aziz, P.; Clément, C.; Mugnai, L.; Fontaine, F. Grapevine trunk diseases: A review of fifteen years of trials for their control with chemicals and biocontrol agents. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 1189–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Falaschetti, L.; Manoni, L.; Calero Fuentes Rivera, R.; Pau, D.; Romanazzi, G.; Silvestroni, O.; Tomaselli, V.; Turchetti, C. A low-cost, low-power and real-time image detector for grape leaf esca disease based on a compressed CNN. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. 2021, 11, 468–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Applsci 12 01177 g001 550
Figure 1. Illustration of representative vessel dimensions measured under the light microscope (4× magnification) on a transverse section from a grapevine cultivar. The maximum diameter (dmax) and minimum diameter (dmin) are easily measured on transverse sections. To calculate the vessel density, the total numbers of vessels per 1 mm2 were determined. The red polygon shows the area of interest (AOI). All vessels outside the AOI were excluded. Scale bar, 100 μm.
Figure 1. Illustration of representative vessel dimensions measured under the light microscope (4× magnification) on a transverse section from a grapevine cultivar. The maximum diameter (dmax) and minimum diameter (dmin) are easily measured on transverse sections. To calculate the vessel density, the total numbers of vessels per 1 mm2 were determined. The red polygon shows the area of interest (AOI). All vessels outside the AOI were excluded. Scale bar, 100 μm.
Applsci 12 01177 g001
Applsci 12 01177 g002 550
Figure 2. Quantification of vessel diameter detected in the preliminary test for ‘Montepulciano’ (A) and ‘Passerina’ (B) cultivar, relating to the singular stem (S) analysed from each plant. The average value per cultivar is also shown (C). Data are means ± standard deviation. Different letters above column indicate significant differences between cultivars (Fisher’s tests; p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2. Quantification of vessel diameter detected in the preliminary test for ‘Montepulciano’ (A) and ‘Passerina’ (B) cultivar, relating to the singular stem (S) analysed from each plant. The average value per cultivar is also shown (C). Data are means ± standard deviation. Different letters above column indicate significant differences between cultivars (Fisher’s tests; p ≤ 0.05).
Applsci 12 01177 g002
Applsci 12 01177 g003 550
Figure 3. Representative cross-sections observed under the light microscope (4× magnification) for the ‘Sauvignon Blanc’ R2 (A), ‘Garofanata’ (B), ‘Nebbiolo’ (C) and ‘Montepulciano’ (D) cultivars. Scale bar, 100 μm. All pictures are displayed at the same magnification.
Figure 3. Representative cross-sections observed under the light microscope (4× magnification) for the ‘Sauvignon Blanc’ R2 (A), ‘Garofanata’ (B), ‘Nebbiolo’ (C) and ‘Montepulciano’ (D) cultivars. Scale bar, 100 μm. All pictures are displayed at the same magnification.
Applsci 12 01177 g003
Applsci 12 01177 g004 550
Figure 4. Box plot representing means of equivalent circle diameters measured in the 24 red-berried grapevine cultivars. The median and mean are represented by solid red and dotted pink lines, respectively. Top and bottom lines of the box correspond to the 25th and 75th percentiles of the data, respectively. Error bars represent the 10th and 90th percentiles. Circles represent outliers. Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between cultivars (Fisher’s tests; p ≤ 0.05). The geographic origin was added.
Figure 4. Box plot representing means of equivalent circle diameters measured in the 24 red-berried grapevine cultivars. The median and mean are represented by solid red and dotted pink lines, respectively. Top and bottom lines of the box correspond to the 25th and 75th percentiles of the data, respectively. Error bars represent the 10th and 90th percentiles. Circles represent outliers. Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between cultivars (Fisher’s tests; p ≤ 0.05). The geographic origin was added.
Applsci 12 01177 g004
Applsci 12 01177 g005 550
Figure 5. Box plot representing means of equivalent circle diameters measured in the 27 white-berried grapevine cultivars. The median and mean are represented by solid red and dotted pink lines, respectively. Top and bottom lines of the box correspond to the 25th and 75th percentiles of the data, respectively. Error bars represent the 10th and 90th percentiles. Circles represent outliers. Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between cultivars (Fisher’s tests; p ≤ 0.05). The geographic origin from Vitis International Variety Catalogue database (www.vivc.de) [39] was added.
Figure 5. Box plot representing means of equivalent circle diameters measured in the 27 white-berried grapevine cultivars. The median and mean are represented by solid red and dotted pink lines, respectively. Top and bottom lines of the box correspond to the 25th and 75th percentiles of the data, respectively. Error bars represent the 10th and 90th percentiles. Circles represent outliers. Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between cultivars (Fisher’s tests; p ≤ 0.05). The geographic origin from Vitis International Variety Catalogue database (www.vivc.de) [39] was added.
Applsci 12 01177 g005
Applsci 12 01177 g006 550
Figure 6. Quantification of vessel density and distribution per diameter class (vessels/mm2) for the 24 red-berried grapevine cultivars. The differentiation in colour defines the minimum (light green) to maximum (light red) values. Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between cultivars (Fisher tests; p ≤ 0.05). *, esca incidence.
Figure 6. Quantification of vessel density and distribution per diameter class (vessels/mm2) for the 24 red-berried grapevine cultivars. The differentiation in colour defines the minimum (light green) to maximum (light red) values. Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between cultivars (Fisher tests; p ≤ 0.05). *, esca incidence.
Applsci 12 01177 g006
Applsci 12 01177 g007 550
Figure 7. Quantification of vessel density and distribution per diameter class (vessels/mm2) for the 27 white-berried grapevine cultivars. The differentiation in colour defines the minimum (light green) to maximum (light red) values. Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between cultivars (Fisher tests; p ≤ 0.05). *, esca incidence.
Figure 7. Quantification of vessel density and distribution per diameter class (vessels/mm2) for the 27 white-berried grapevine cultivars. The differentiation in colour defines the minimum (light green) to maximum (light red) values. Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between cultivars (Fisher tests; p ≤ 0.05). *, esca incidence.
Applsci 12 01177 g007
Applsci 12 01177 g008 550
Figure 8. Pearson’s correlations between vessel diameters and vessel densities (A,D), vessel diameters and disease incidence (B,E), and disease incidence and vessel densities (C,F) in the red-berried cultivars (A–C) and white-berried cultivars (D–F).
Figure 8. Pearson’s correlations between vessel diameters and vessel densities (A,D), vessel diameters and disease incidence (B,E), and disease incidence and vessel densities (C,F) in the red-berried cultivars (A–C) and white-berried cultivars (D–F).
Applsci 12 01177 g008
Applsci 12 01177 g009 550
Figure 9. Comparisons between the xylem characteristics of vessel diameter (columns), and vessel density (circle) (A) and disease incidence (B) of the red-berried and white-berried cultivars of the grapevines. Data are means ± standard deviation. Different letters above column indicate significant differences between cultivars (Fisher’s tests; p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 9. Comparisons between the xylem characteristics of vessel diameter (columns), and vessel density (circle) (A) and disease incidence (B) of the red-berried and white-berried cultivars of the grapevines. Data are means ± standard deviation. Different letters above column indicate significant differences between cultivars (Fisher’s tests; p ≤ 0.05).
Applsci 12 01177 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Foglia, R.; Landi, L.; Romanazzi, G. Analyses of Xylem Vessel Size on Grapevine Cultivars and Relationship with Incidence of Esca Disease, a Threat to Grape Quality. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1177. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031177

AMA Style

Foglia R, Landi L, Romanazzi G. Analyses of Xylem Vessel Size on Grapevine Cultivars and Relationship with Incidence of Esca Disease, a Threat to Grape Quality. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(3):1177. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031177

Chicago/Turabian Style

Foglia, Renzo, Lucia Landi, and Gianfranco Romanazzi. 2022. "Analyses of Xylem Vessel Size on Grapevine Cultivars and Relationship with Incidence of Esca Disease, a Threat to Grape Quality" Applied Sciences 12, no. 3: 1177. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031177

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop