Next Article in Journal
Application of Three Types of Cinnamon Essential Oils as Natural Antifungal Preservatives in Wheat Bread
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Investigation of Thermal Efficiency of a Solar Cell
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experimental Study on Pot Damage and Contact Stress Distribution Characteristics of Oil Sunflower Plug Seedlings

1
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
2
Taiyuan Agricultural Technology Extension Service Center, Taiyuan 030002, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(21), 10889; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110889
Submission received: 11 October 2022 / Revised: 23 October 2022 / Accepted: 24 October 2022 / Published: 27 October 2022

Abstract

:
To reveal the collision damage mechanisms of plug seedlings and improve the quality of seedlings, the kinetics equations of the plug seedlings were established based on the generalized Hertz-theory. The influence laws of different factors on pot damage were obtained through a drop impact test. The Tekscan pressure distribution measurement system measured the collision impact force, and the orthogonal tests were conducted. The test showed that the influence of the collision impact force was on the order of plug specification > drop height > contact material. The Tekscan pressure distribution measurement system measured the change law of contact stress distribution under significant influencing factors. The test results showed that the collision contact area between the plug seedlings and contact materials from large to small was soil, steel, and ABS plastic. The collision contact area between the plug seedlings and other plug specifications was 50 plug, 72 plug, and 105 plug from the largest to the smallest. When the plug seedlings collided with contact materials, the average contact stress between the seedlings and the steel plate ranged from 19.4 kPa to 22.8 kPa. When the plug seedlings of various sizes collided with steel plates, the average contact stress was ordered as 105 plug, 72 plug and 50 plug in descending order. A linear regression model between collision impact force and matrix loss rate under different factors was established based on the pressure data collected by the Tekscan pressure distribution measurement system. This study provides a basis for exploring the impact damage mechanisms of plug seedlings and improving the seedling quality.

1. Introduction

Compared with open-field direct seeding and mulching sowing, seedling transplanting has obvious advantages in terms of economic crop planting in Inner Mongolia [1,2,3]. Oil sunflower is a typical crop with a short growth cycle, wide adaptability, and drought resistance. It has become the fourth-largest oil crop after soybean, peanut and rape in China [4,5,6]. During mechanized transplanting, the plug seedlings need to go through the processes of picking up, feeding, carrying, and planting. The plug seedling will inevitably collide, impact, and be squeezed with the key component of the transplanter. The pot will be thus damaged, which will seriously affect the transplant survival rate. Therefore, it is urgent to study the mechanical properties of drop impact of plug seedlings.
Many studies have mainly focused on matrix loss and collision movements between plug seedlings and planters. Han et al. [7] designed a multipin flexible seedling pick-up gripper and conducted transplanting tests, obtaining 93.37% integrity of the plug seedling substrate. Jin et al. [8] studied the effect of the clamping speed of the seedling gripper on the success rate of seedling picking and optimized the clamping parameters to improve the success rate of seedling picking and reduced the damage to the pots. Paradkar et al. [9] designed a robotic arm that can grab and drop 20 seedlings per minute. The seedling-picking system developed based on the robotic arm has a simple structure and effectively reduces matrix loss. Jiang et al. [10] studied the effects of the matrix ratio, water content, and pot quality on seedling extraction and the matrix breakage success rate. Chen et al. [11] studied the collision motion between the plug seedling and the planter, established the different equations of the motion of the plug seedling at each stage, and verified the reliability of the established model through high-speed photography experiments. Jin et al. [12] performed a high-speed photographic analysis of the collision movement process of the planting device and the seedlings falling to the bottom of the planter established a dynamic model at each stage. Liu et al. [13], utilizing Hertz’s theory, obtained the maximum contact force equation of the seedling pot and the impulse and impulse moment theorems to obtain the equation of motion of the collision between the pot and seedling stem and the planting device. The contact stress distribution of hole tray seedlings under load is directly related to the pot damage of hole tray seedlings during transplanting. At present, there are three main methods to study agricultural material damage: (1) Velocity variation laws measured by velocity (acceleration) sensors to determine the pot damage during material collisions [14,15]. (2) Using a pressure-sensitive film to analyze the damage in the process of collision [16,17]. (3) Combined with analysis software, the film pressure sensor is used to analyze the collision process of the material [18,19]. Compared with the first and third schemes, the second scheme uses a flexible film network tactile pressure sensor and an I-Scan System data processing system, which can visually analyze the contact stress distribution of the plug seedlings during the collision process and explore the plug seedling impact damage mechanism.
This paper used T562 oil sunflower plug seedlings as the research object. The drop impact test of the plug seedlings was carried out with the matrix loss rate as the test index. To further study the collision impact force on the pot damage, the Tekscan pressure distribution measurement system was used to measure the collision impact force, and the orthogonal tests were conducted under different factors to obtain the influence degree of each factor on the collision impact force. The significant influencing parameters were deeply analyzed to obtain the regression equation between the contact stress distribution and the pot damage. This study provides a basis for exploring the impact damage mechanisms of plug seedlings and improving the seedling quality.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Test Material

In this test, T562 oil sunflower plug seedlings were grown by the Inner Mongolia Heyuan Agricultural Technology Company. The seedling matrix consisted of grass carbon, vermiculite, and pearlstone with a mass ratio of 3:1:1 [20]. Different specifications of oil sunflower plug seedlings were cultivated, and the seedling age was 30 days. The moisture content was measured by the drying method at 58.78–62.47%. The oil sunflower plug seedlings grew normally, with well-developed root systems knotted together with the seedling matrix to form a strong and flexible pot, as shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Collision Impact Force Analysis of Oil Sunflower Plug Seedlings

2.2.1. Analysis of Collision Impact Force Change Process of Oil Sunflower Seedlings

The plug seedling is a typical nonlinear viscoelastic material. This paper is based on the analysis of the generalized Hertz-theory in the ideal state [21,22]; there is a damping effect in the collision contact stage, and the maximum compression lags behind the maximum collision impact force. As shown in Figure 2, when the seedling fell from a certain height and collided with the contact material, the collision impact force gradually increased from zero. The pot is in a compression state. When the collision impact force reached the maximum value, it started to unload and slowly reached 0.

2.2.2. Theoretical Analysis on Contact Force of Oil Sunflower Plug Seedlings

It was assumed that the physical parameters of plug seedlings were consistent, ignoring the influence of air resistance and other factors. The plug seedlings were only affected by gravity during the falling process. The kinetic energy theorem obtained the normal velocity of the seedlings before the collision. According to the kinetic energy theorem:
mgh = 1 2 mv 1 2
where m is the mass of oil sunflower plug seedlings, g; g is the acceleration of gravity, m/s2; h is the drop height, m; v1 is the initial collision velocity, m/s.
Including:
v 1 = 2 gh
According to the impulse theorem:
t 1 t 2 F dt = m Δ v
where: t1 is the starting time of the collision, s; t2 is the collision contact time, s; F is collision impact force, N; ∆v is the change of velocity before and after the collision, m/s.
Therefore,
t 1 t 2 F dt = m ( v 2   v 1 )
where: v2 is the collision velocity of the plug seedling in t2 time, m/s
When v2 is equal to 0, the compression amount of the pot reaches the maximum, and the corresponding time is ts.
t 1 t s F dt = mv 1 = m 2 gh
It can be seen from Figure 2 that the area of the curved edge formed by the collision impact force F and the time t1~ts is approximately equal to the rectangular area of the side length tst1 and Fm.
t 1 t s F dt = k 0 F m ( t s t 1 )
where k0 is the area coefficient.
From Equations (5) and (6), it follows that:
F m = 2 g k 0 t s t 1 m h
In Equation (7), k0, t1, and ts are all related to the test and contact materials. Therefore, the maximum collision impact force Fm is mainly associated with the quality of the plug seedlings, drop height, contact material, and other factors.

2.3. Drop Impact Test on Oil Sunflower Plug Seedlings

As shown in Figure 3, the drop impact test between the plug seedlings and the steel plate was mainly composed of a seedling gripper, frame, handle, 5250 flexible thin-film-network tactile pressure sensor, and computer. The pressure distribution measurement system was composed of a 5250 flexible-film-network tactile pressure sensor, a handle, and an I-Scan System [23]. A flexible-film-network tactile pressure sensor was arranged in the test plane. A calibration file needed to be imported and zeroed before each test began. The sensor surface was cleaned of the residual loss matrix after each drop impact test.
This test mainly adopted the working principle of free fall, which was divided into three cases. The plug seedlings collided with the soil. The soil thickness in the test soil bin was 16 cm, and the width was 37 cm. The soil was sandy loam, the moisture content was 14.52%, and the soil compaction was 90~100 N/cm2. To protect the sensor and ensure consistent buffering properties of the soil, the soil surface was wrapped with plastic film, the sensor was placed on the surface of the film, and a thin layer of soil was laid flat on top of the sensor, as shown in Figure 3a; for the collision between the plug seedling and the steel plate, a steel plate was placed on the test plane, and sensors were arranged on the steel plate, as shown in Figure 3b; the plug seedling collided with the ABS plastic, an ABS plastic plate was placed on the test plane, and the sensor was arranged on it. The steel plate in Figure 3b was replaced with an ABS plastic plate. The properties of the three contact materials are shown in Table 1 [24]. To make the oil sunflower seedlings drop vertically as much as possible, the seedling gripper was used to clamp the stem at the junction of the plug seedlings and the pot. The drop height (h) is the distance from the bottom of the pot to the test plane, as shown in Figure 4.

2.4. Testing Principle and Method of the Flexible Film Network Tactile Pressure Sensor

As shown in Figure 5, the sensor size was 245.9 × 245.9 mm, the spatial resolution was 3.2/cm2, the pressure measurement range was 0~0.179 MPa, and the scanning frequency was 0~100 Hz. The flexible thin-film-network tactile pressure sensor was a matrix-based thin film pressure sensor consisting of 2 very thin polyester films. Many rows of strip conductors were laid on the inner surface of one film, and some columns of strip conductors were laid on the inner surface of another film. Many horizontal and longitudinal conductors were crossed to an array of stress-sensing points [25,26].
After the oil sunflower plug seedlings collided with different contact materials, the flexible film-network tactile pressure sensor scanning circuit scanned each sensing point. The resistance value of each force sensing point was measured by the I-Scan System data processing system and converted into data such as contact stress, contact area and contact stress peak value.

2.5. Pot Damage Measurement Method

To explore the law of pot damage, it was necessary to study the matrix loss of the pot before and after the drop impact of the plug seedlings. When the matrix loss of the plug seedlings was greater, the damage to the pot was greater. In contrast, when the matrix loss of the plug seedlings was less, the damage to the pot was smaller. The matrix loss rate (K) represents the percentage of the mass of the seedlings after the drop and the mass of the matrix before the drop [27], as shown in Formula (8):
K = M M 1 M   ×   100 %
where K is the matrix loss rate, %; M is the mass of plug seedlings before the drop impact, g; and M1 is the mass of plug seedlings after the drop impact, g.

2.6. Orthogonal Test and Significance Analysis

Taking the matrix loss rate as the test index, the impact damage test of the plug seedlings was carried out under different factors. To further study the collision impact force on the pot damage, the collision impact force was used as the test index, and different plug specifications, contact materials, and drop heights were used as the test factors. The Box-Behnken module of Design-Expert 8.0.6 was used to design an orthogonal test with 3 factors and 3 levels. Seventeen groups of tests were carried out. The test factors and levels are shown in Table 2. Each group of drop impact tests was repeated 20 times, and the average value was taken as the final value.
As the sensor is a matrix-based membrane pressure sensor, many transverse and longitudinal conductors cross to form a stress-sensing point array. Therefore, the contact stress in this paper is the average value of the stress at many impact contact sensing points. The average contact stress (P) and contact area (A) of the oilseed sunflower plug seedlings had a significant effect on the pot damage. The product of the average value of the contact stress and the contact area is the collision impact force [28], as shown in Equation (9):
F = P   ×   A   ×   10 3
where F is the collision impact force, N; A is the contact area, mm2; and P is the average contact stress s, kPa.
The influence and significance of each factor on the impact force were obtained through the analysis of the orthogonal test results, and the significant influencing parameters were analyzed to obtain the regression equation and determination coefficient between the contact stress distribution and the pot damage.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Variation Law of Collision Impact Damage of the Pot

3.1.1. Variation Law of the Collision Impact Damage under Different Contact Materials

The seedling age was 30 days, and 72 plug seedlings with the same overall growth were selected to carry out the drop impact test between the oilseed sunflower seedlings and steel, soil, and ABS plastic at different heights. The test results are shown in Figure 6. The matrix loss of the seedlings increased linearly with increasing drop height. When the drop height was less than 150 mm, the matrix loss of oil sunflower seedlings on the steel plate, soil, and ABS plastic was small. When the drop height was over 150 mm, the loss of the seedling matrix of the oilseed sunflower hole tray was obvious. The loss of the steel plate was larger, followed by the soil, and the plastic plate was the smallest. The main reason was that the plastic deformation of the steel plate was smaller when the seedlings collided with the steel plate, making the pot more deformed, and the matrix loss when the seedlings collided with the steel plate was larger than other materials. Although the soil had a certain hardness, there were still many pores inside. The contact area was large during collision, which reduced the deformation; therefore, the matrix loss between the seedling and the soil was at an intermediate level. When the oil sunflower plug seedlings collided with the ABS plastic, the plastic had a certain elasticity, which buffered the collision and deformation of the seedlings. The plug seedlings had less pot damage and less matrix loss. The damage to the pot of the seedlings caused by different contact materials was related to the contact stress, the contact area, and the collision impact force.

3.1.2. Variation Law of Collision Impact Damage under Different Plug Specifications

The seedling age was 30 days, contact material being a steel plate, and the overall growth pattern were selected, and the drop impact test of oil sunflower plug seedlings under different plug specifications was carried out. The test results are shown in Figure 7. The matrix loss of seedlings increased linearly with increasing drop height. Among them, the 50 plug seedlings had the largest matrix loss, the 72 plug seedlings were the second, and the 105 plug seedlings had the least substrate loss. The main reason for this was that with the increase in the drop height, the contact stress and contact area mechanisms under different plug specifications of the plug seedlings and the steel plate were different, which eventually aggravated the pot damage, and the matrix loss gradually increased.

3.2. Establishment of Collision Impact Force Model and Regression Analysis

The drop impact test of the seedlings was carried out with different test factors (contact material, drop height and plug specification). As shown in Table 3, orthogonal tests were designed by Box-Behnken. Multiple regression fitting analysis was performed on the test results. A quadratic multinomial regression model of the plug specification (X1), contact material (X2), and drop height (X3) was established, as shown in Equation (10).
F = 6 . 20     1 . 21   ×   X 1     0 . 23   ×   X 2 + 0 . 83   ×   X 3 + 0 . 038   ×   X 1 X 2 + 0 . 22   ×   X 1 X 3   0 . 12   ×   X 2 X 3 + 0 . 59   ×   X 1 2     0 . 81   ×   X 2 2     0 . 074   ×   X 3 2  
where, F is the collision impact force, N, and X1, X2, and X3 are the plug specification, contact material and drop height (mm), respectively.
The analysis of variance (ANOVA) and significance were carried out on the quadratic regression model of the collision impact force, and the results are shown in Table 4. The regression model of collision impact force was p < 0.0001, indicating that the model was extremely significant. The regression equation determination coefficient R2 = 0.9877 and the adjusted determination coefficient adjusted R2 = 0.9718 both were close to 1. Therefore, the regression equation had high reliability. The lack of fit p = 0.6484 > 0.05 indicated that the regression equation fit well and could better reflect the relationship between the collision impact force F and X1, X2 and X3. In this model, X1, X3, X12, and X22 had very significant impacts on the collision impact force, and X2 had a significant effect on the collision impact force. The influence on the collision impact force was on the order of plug specification > drop height > contact material.

3.3. Analysis of Collision Contact Stress Distribution between Oil Sunflower Plug Seedlings and Contact Materials

3.3.1. Collision Contact Stress Distribution Characteristics of Contact Material to Plug Seedlings

According to the analysis of the orthogonal test results, the contact material and the drop height had a significant effect on the collision impact force. A drop impact test with oil sunflower plug seedlings and three contact materials was carried out, and the contact stress and distribution of the seedling were obtained through the flexible film network tactile pressure sensor and the I-Scan System data processing system. The results are shown in Figure 8. When the oil sunflower seedlings were dropped and collided with different contact materials, a contact stress of 10–30 kPa accounted for the main area, which played a significant role in the pot damage. A contact stress of 30–35 kPa occurred at higher drop heights. Combined with the overall structure of the transplanter and the assembly relationship between various components, the drop height was less than 350 mm during seedling picking, feeding, carrying, and planting. Therefore, contact stress was not the main stress that caused pot damage. When the contact stress was 10~15 kPa, the contact area showed little difference at different drop heights. When the contact stress was >15 kPa, the contact area with a drop height of 350 mm was much larger than that of other drop heights. This shows that with the increase in the drop height, the high stress area accounts for the main contact area, which is the main reason for the collision damage of these pots.
The stress distribution of different contact materials after collision is shown in Figure 9. The contours of the seedlings colliding with different contact materials were in a relatively standard shape, and the contact area between the seedlings and the soil was significantly larger than that of other two materials. The dark blue area is low stress, the red area is high stress, and the colorless area has a contact stress of 0 kPa. When the drop height was 50 mm, the low-stress area occupied the main area. When the drop height was greater than or equal to 150 mm, the high-stress area was generally located in the middle of the contact area. With the increase in the drop height, the low-stress-distribution area decreased significantly, the high-stress area showed a gradually increasing trend, and the pot damage was larger.

3.3.2. Average Contact Stress and Contact Area of the Seedlings

As shown in Figure 10, as the drop height increased, the contact areas were linearly related between different contact materials, and the coefficients of determination (R2) were all greater than 0.95. When the drop height was constant, the collision contact area between the oil sunflower plug seedlings and the contact materials ranged from large to small: soil, steel, and ABS plastic. The soil was compacted before the test in the test soil bin, and there were still many pores in the soil. During the test, when the oil sunflower seedlings collided with the soil, the contact area was higher, and the matrix loss of the oil sunflower seedlings and the deformation of the pot were reduced. When the plug seedlings collided with the steel plate, the plastic deformation of the steel plate was small, and the deformation was mainly concentrated on the pot, which increased the pot damage and matrix loss. When the oil sunflower seedlings collided with the ABS plastic, the contact area was small, and the plastic had a certain elasticity, which buffered the collision and deformation of the seedlings. The variation mechanisms of the contact area of oilseed sunflower plug seedlings on different contact materials were different, indicating that there was a certain relationship between the contact area and pot damage.
As shown in Figure 11, the average contact stress between the plug seedlings and the steel plate was relatively large, ranging from 19.4 to 22.8 kPa, and the average contact stress tended to increase significantly with increasing drop height. The contact stress between the seedlings and the soil was in the middle level, ranging from 19 to 22 kPa, and the average contact stress fluctuated slightly. The average contact stress of the seedlings on the ABS plastic was significantly smaller than that on the steel plate and the soil. With increasing drop height, there was an obvious increasing trend, and the average stress range was 18.8~21 kPa. The variation mechanisms of the average contact stress of oil sunflower plug seedlings on different contact materials were different, indicating that there was a certain relationship between the average contact stress and pot damage.

3.3.3. Relationship between the Contact Stress Distribution of the Seedlings and Pot Damage

The relationship between the pot damage and the collision impact force between the oil sunflower plug seedlings and different materials is shown in Table 5. The collision impact force of different materials and the matrix loss rate of seedlings were linearly correlated, and the determination coefficients (R2) were all greater than 0.90. This shows that the contact stress and contact area of the plug seedlings with different materials measured by the flexible film network tactile pressure sensor could more accurately represent the pot damage.

3.4. Analysis of Collision Contact Stress Distribution between Oil Sunflower Plug Seedlings and Plug Specifications

3.4.1. Distribution Characteristics of the Collision Contact Stress between the Steel Plate and the Plug Seedlings with Different Plug Specifications

The seedling age is 30 days, and steel was selected as the contact material. The drop impact test of oil sunflower plug seedlings of different plug specifications was carried out. During the test, the contact stress distribution of the seedlings was obtained through the flexible film network tactile pressure sensor. The test results are shown in Figure 12. When the drop height was constant, the contact area of the oil sunflower plug seedlings of different plug specifications and the steel plate was, from small to large, 105 plug, 72 plug, and 50 plug. With the increase in the drop height, the low-stress-distribution area decreased significantly, the high-stress area showed a gradually increasing trend, and the pot damage was larger.

3.4.2. Average Contact Stress and Contact Area between the Steel Plate and the Plug Seedlings with Plug Specifications

As shown in Figure 13, the contact areas of drop impact of different plug specifications were linearly correlated, and the coefficients of determination (R2) were all greater than 0.90. When the oil sunflower plug seedlings dropped at the same height, the contact area of the oilseed sunflower seedlings of different plug specifications from large to small was as follows: 50 plug, 72 plug, and 105 plug. The main reason for this was that the plastic deformation of the steel plate was small, and the deformation was mainly concentrated on the pot. With increasing drop height, the contact area of the oil sunflower plug seedlings and the pot damage gradually increased. The changing mechanisms of the contact area between the oil sunflower plug seedlings of different plug specifications and the steel plate collision were different, resulting in completely different damage degrees of the pot.
As shown in Figure 14, the average contact stress of oil sunflower plug seedlings with different plug specifications and the steel plate was, from large to small, 105 plug, 72 plug, and 50 plug. The average contact stress between the 105 plug seedlings and the steel plate was significantly impact, and the average stress ranged from 18.1 to 21.9 kPa. The main reason for this was that the contact area of the 105 plug oil sunflower seedlings and the steel plate was small, and the stress was concentrated. The changing mechanisms of the average contact stress of oil sunflower seedlings under different sizes was different, indicating that there was a certain relationship between the average contact stress and pot damage.

3.4.3. Relationship between the Contact Stress Distribution of Plug Seedlings and Pot Damage

The relationship between pot damage and collision impact force for different plug specifications of oil sunflower seedlings with the steel plate is shown in Table 6. The collision impact force of different specifications of oil sunflower plug seedlings was linearly correlated with the matrix loss rate of seedlings, and the coefficients of determination (R2) were all greater than 0.90. This shows that the contact stress distribution of different specifications of oil sunflower plug seedlings and the steel plate measured by the flexible film-network tactile pressure sensor could more accurately represent the pot damage.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the kinetics equations of the plug seedlings were established in the process of dropping based on the generalized Hertz-theory. The drop impact test of the plug seedlings was carried out under different factors with the matrix loss rate as the test index. The Tekscan pressure distribution measurement system measured the collision impact force. The orthogonal tests were conducted under different factors. The influence degree of each factor on impact force was obtained. The regression equation between the contact stress distribution and the pot damage was obtained by analyzing the significant influence parameters. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1) The influence laws of different factors on pot damage were obtained through a drop impact test. The Tekscan pressure distribution measurement system measured the collision impact force, and the orthogonal tests were conducted. The test showed that the influence of the collision impact force was on the order of plug specification > drop height > contact material.
(2) The Tekscan pressure distribution measurement system measured the change law of contact stress distribution under significant influencing factors. The test results showed the collision contact area between the plug seedlings and different contact materials from large to small was soil, steel, and ABS plastic. The collision contact area between the plug seedlings and other plug specifications was 50 plug, 72 plug, and 105 plug from the largest to the smallest. When the plug seedlings collided with different contact materials, the average contact stress between the seedlings and the steel plate ranged from 19.4 kPa to 22.8 kPa. When the plug seedlings of various sizes collided with steel plates, the average contact stress was ordered as 105 plug, 72 plug, and 50 plug in descending order. A linear regression model between collision impact force and matrix loss rate under different factors was established based on the pressure data collected by the Tekscan pressure distribution testing system, and the determination coefficients (R2) were more significant than 0.90.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L. (Xuying Li); methodology, F.Z. and H.B.; software, F.Z. and J.C.; data curation, Y.Z. and X.L. (Xuening Liu); formal analysis, writing—original draft preparation, writing review and editing, F.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (32160423) and the Natural Science Foundation of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China (2020MS05055).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on demand from the first author at (zfd19508@163.com).

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (32160423) and the Natural Science Foundation of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China (2020MS05055). We also appreciate the work of the editors and the reviewers of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kumawat, L.; Raheman, H.; Singh, V. Design and development of a tractor drawn automatic onion transplanter. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2020, 9, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, M.; Jin, X.; Ji, J.; Li, P.; Du, X. Design and experiment of intelligent sorting and transplanting system for healthy vegetable seedlings. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2021, 14, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pérez-Ruiz, M.; Slaughter, D.C. Development of a precision 3-row synchronised transplanter. Biosyst. Eng. 2021, 206, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Baydar, H.; ERBAŞ, S. Influence of seed development and seed position on oil, fatty acids and total tocopherol contents in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Turk. J. Agric. For. 2005, 29, 179–186. [Google Scholar]
  5. Izquierdo, N.G.; Aguirrezábal, L.A.N. Genetic variability in the response of fatty acid composition to minimum night temperature during grain filling in sunflower. Field Crops Res. 2008, 106, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Steer, B.T.; Seiler, G.J. Changes in fatty acid composition of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) seeds in response to time of nitrogen application, supply rates and defoliation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1990, 51, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hua, H.L.; Francis, K.; Ping, M.H.; Ping, H.J. Design and tests of a multi-pin flexible seedling pick-up gripper for automatic transplanting. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2019, 35, 949–950. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jin, X.; Ji, J.T.; Huang, Z.Z. Seedling pick-up mechanism of five-bar combined with ordinary gear train. Int. Agric. Eng. J. 2017, 26, 151–158. [Google Scholar]
  9. Paradkar, V.; Raheman, H.; Rahul, K. Development of a metering mechanism with serial robotic arm for handling paper pot seedlings in a vegetable transplanter. Artif. Intell. Agric. 2021, 5, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, Z.H.; Hu, Y.; Jiang, H.Y.; Tong, J.H. Design and force analysis of end-effector for plug seedling transplanter. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0180229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Chen, J.N.; Xia, X.D.; Wang, Y.; JunYan, J.; Zhang, P.H. Motion differential equations of seedling in duckbilled planting nozzle and its application experiment. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2015, 31, 31–39. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jin, X.; Ji, J.T.; Liu, W.X.; He, Y.K.; Du, X.W. Structural optimization of duckbilled transplanter based on dynamic model of pot seedling movement. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2018, 34, 58–67. [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu, Y.; Mao, H.P.; Wang, T.; Li, B.; Li, Y.X. Collision optimization and experiment of tomato plug seedling in basket-type transplanting mechanism. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2018, 49, 143–151. [Google Scholar]
  14. Deng, W.; Wang, C.; Xie, S. Collision simulation of potato on rod separator. Int. J. Food Eng. 2020, 17, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Deng, W.; Wang, C.; Xie, S. Impact peak force measurement of potato. Int. J. Food Prop. 2020, 23, 616–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Lu, F.; Ishikawa, Y.; Kitazawa, H.; Satake, T. Impact damage to apple fruits in commercial corrugated fiberboard box packaging evaluated by the pressure-sensitive film technique. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2010, 8, 218–222. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lu, F.; Ishikawa, Y.; Kitazawa, H.; Satake, T. Measurement of impact pressure and bruising of apple fruit using pressure-sensitive film technique. J. Food Eng. 2010, 96, 614–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Herold, B.; Geyer, M.; Studman, C.J. Fruit contact pressure distributions—equipment. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2001, 32, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Komarnicki, P.; Stopa, R.; Szyjewicz, D.; Kuta, Ł.; Klimza, T. Influence of Contact Surface Type on the Mechanical Damages of Apples under Impact Loads. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2017, 10, 1479–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zeng, F.D.; Li, X.Y.; Li, X.; Su, Q.; Zhang, Y.Z. Experiment and analysis of high-speed photographic techniques for throwing motion of seedlings. J. China Agric. Univ. 2021, 26, 168–176. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hua, H.L. Mechanical Analysis of the Root Lumps and Development of a Robotic Transplanter for Vegetable Plug Seedlings. Ph.D. Thesis, Jiangsu University, Zhenjing, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  22. He, J.Y.; Liu, W.M.; Xie, B.; Wang, J.; Hao, L. Calculation methods during crashing based on spring-damping model. Mech. Manag. Dev. 2016, 31, 7–8+50. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hunston, M. Innovative thin-film pressure mapping sensors. Sens. Rev. 2002, 22, 319–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, J.; Guo, K.Q.; Ge, Y.; Wang, Y.Y. Contact pressure distribution characteristics of Korla pear fruit at moment of drop impact. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2012, 28, 250–254+300. [Google Scholar]
  25. Agins, H.J.; Harder, V.S.; Lautenschlager, E.P.; Kudrsna, J.C. Effects of sterilization on the Tekscan digital pressure sensor. Med. Eng. Phys. 2003, 25, 775–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, L.J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, D.H.; Xu, B.P.; Liu, C.X. Early recognition for dairy cow lameness based on pressure distribution measurement system. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2016, 47, 426–432. [Google Scholar]
  27. Tang, Y.H. Reaserch on Parameters Optimization and Performance Test for the Dibble-Type Planting Apparatus of Vegetable Pot Seedling Transplanter. Master’s Thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen, Z.H.; Duan, H.B.; Cai, X.K.; Wang, J.Q.; Xu, T.; Yu, S.S.; Yao, F.H.; Yan, F.Y. Distribution characteristics of potato contact stress during the drop impact. J. South China Agric. Univ. 2020, 41, 99–108. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Oil sunflower plug seedlings at the planting stage.
Figure 1. Oil sunflower plug seedlings at the planting stage.
Applsci 12 10889 g001
Figure 2. Variation curve of collision impact force-time for oil sunflower plug seedlings. t1 is the start loading times; tm is the times corresponding to the maximum collision impact force; ts is the time corresponding to the maximum compression; t2 is the collision end times; Fm is the maximum collision impact force; Fs is the collision impact force corresponding to the maximum compression.
Figure 2. Variation curve of collision impact force-time for oil sunflower plug seedlings. t1 is the start loading times; tm is the times corresponding to the maximum collision impact force; ts is the time corresponding to the maximum compression; t2 is the collision end times; Fm is the maximum collision impact force; Fs is the collision impact force corresponding to the maximum compression.
Applsci 12 10889 g002
Figure 3. Drop impact test on oil sunflower plug seedlings. (a) Drop impact test between oil sunflower plug seedlings and the soil; (b) drop impact test between oil sunflower plug seedlings and steel plate. 1. Seedling gripper; 2. Frame; 3. 5250 flexible thin-film-network tactile pressure sensor; 4. Plug seedlings; 5. Plastic film; 6. Test soil bin; 7. Fastening bolts; 8. Computer and I-Scan System data processing system; 9. Handles; 10.The steel plate.
Figure 3. Drop impact test on oil sunflower plug seedlings. (a) Drop impact test between oil sunflower plug seedlings and the soil; (b) drop impact test between oil sunflower plug seedlings and steel plate. 1. Seedling gripper; 2. Frame; 3. 5250 flexible thin-film-network tactile pressure sensor; 4. Plug seedlings; 5. Plastic film; 6. Test soil bin; 7. Fastening bolts; 8. Computer and I-Scan System data processing system; 9. Handles; 10.The steel plate.
Applsci 12 10889 g003
Figure 4. Position of the plug seedlings with steel plates before dropping.
Figure 4. Position of the plug seedlings with steel plates before dropping.
Applsci 12 10889 g004
Figure 5. Structure diagram of the 5250 flexible thin-film-network tactile pressure sensor.
Figure 5. Structure diagram of the 5250 flexible thin-film-network tactile pressure sensor.
Applsci 12 10889 g005
Figure 6. The relationship between matrix loss and drop height of plug seedlings with three contact materials.
Figure 6. The relationship between matrix loss and drop height of plug seedlings with three contact materials.
Applsci 12 10889 g006
Figure 7. The relationship between matrix loss and drop height of oil sunflower seedlings under different plug specifications.
Figure 7. The relationship between matrix loss and drop height of oil sunflower seedlings under different plug specifications.
Applsci 12 10889 g007
Figure 8. Contact stress distribution of oil sunflower seedlings of three contact materials under different drop heights. (a) Steel; (b) soil; (c) ABS plastic. The experiment was carried out in the Agricultural Biological Environment and Energy Engineering Laboratory, College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, on 7 August 2022.
Figure 8. Contact stress distribution of oil sunflower seedlings of three contact materials under different drop heights. (a) Steel; (b) soil; (c) ABS plastic. The experiment was carried out in the Agricultural Biological Environment and Energy Engineering Laboratory, College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, on 7 August 2022.
Applsci 12 10889 g008
Figure 9. Typical stress distribution of oil sunflower plug seedlings of different contact materials under different drop heights.
Figure 9. Typical stress distribution of oil sunflower plug seedlings of different contact materials under different drop heights.
Applsci 12 10889 g009
Figure 10. The relationship between contact area and drop height of different contact materials.
Figure 10. The relationship between contact area and drop height of different contact materials.
Applsci 12 10889 g010
Figure 11. The relationship between average contact stress and drop height of different contact materials.
Figure 11. The relationship between average contact stress and drop height of different contact materials.
Applsci 12 10889 g011
Figure 12. Typical stress distribution of oil sunflower seedlings of different plug specifications under different drop heights.
Figure 12. Typical stress distribution of oil sunflower seedlings of different plug specifications under different drop heights.
Applsci 12 10889 g012
Figure 13. The relationship between the contact area and the drop height of different plug specifications.
Figure 13. The relationship between the contact area and the drop height of different plug specifications.
Applsci 12 10889 g013
Figure 14. The relationship between the average contact stress and the drop height of the plug seedlings of different plug specifications.
Figure 14. The relationship between the average contact stress and the drop height of the plug seedlings of different plug specifications.
Applsci 12 10889 g014
Table 1. Properties of three contact materials.
Table 1. Properties of three contact materials.
Type of MaterialThickness/mmDensity/(g/cm3)Elastic Modulus/GPaPoisson’s Ratio
Steel57.851820.3
ABS plastic51.072.20.39
Soil1601.4520.002840.42
Table 2. Test factors and levels.
Table 2. Test factors and levels.
FactorsThe Level of Coding
−10+1
Plug specification50 plug72 plug105 plug
Contact materialSteelSoilABS Plastic
Dropping height/mm50150250
Table 3. Box-Behnken test design and results.
Table 3. Box-Behnken test design and results.
No.Test Factor Level ValueCollision Impact Force/N
X1X2X3
10006.08
2−1−107.42
30115.77
40006.08
51104.62
61016.55
70006.18
80−116.39
9−1018.66
1001−14.48
11−1106.81
121−105.08
13−10−17.33
140006.08
150006.58
160−1−14.63
1710−14.33
Table 4. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the collision impact force.
Table 4. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the collision impact force.
SourceSum of SquaresFreedomMean SquareF Valuep Value
Model21.8092.4262.21<0.0001 **
X111.62111.62298.34<0.0001 **
X20.4210.4210.870.0132 *
X35.4515.45139.85<0.0001 **
X1 X20.00562510.0056250.140.7151
X1 X30.2010.205.090.0587
X2 X30.05510.0551.420.2725
X121.4711.4737.800.0005 **
X222.7512.7570.73<0.0001 **
X320.02310.0230.590.4682
Residual0.2770.039
Lack of Fit0.08530.0280.60.6484
Pure Error0.1940.047
Cor Total22.0716
R20.9877
Note: * indicates significant (p < 0.05), ** indicates highly significant (p < 0.01).
Table 5. Relationship between matrix loss and collision impact force of plug seedlings with different contact materials.
Table 5. Relationship between matrix loss and collision impact force of plug seedlings with different contact materials.
Contact MaterialRegression EquationR2
SteelK = 1.81 × P × A × 10−3 − 8.130.976
SoilK = 1.22 × P × A × 10−3 − 5.980.965
ABS PlasticK = 2.11 × P × A × 10−3 − 9.430.940
Note: K is the matrix loss rate, %; P is the average contact stress, kPa; A is the contact area, mm2.
Table 6. The relationship between the matrix loss and the collision impact force of different specifications of oil sunflower plug seedlings.
Table 6. The relationship between the matrix loss and the collision impact force of different specifications of oil sunflower plug seedlings.
SizesRegression EquationR2
50 plugK = 1.56 × P × A × 10−3 − 8.570.958
72 plugK = 1.81 × P × A × 10−3 − 8.130.976
105 plugK = 1.73 × P × A × 10−3 − 6.990.915
Note: K is the matrix loss rate, %; P is the average contact stress, kPa; A is the contact area, mm2.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeng, F.; Li, X.; Bai, H.; Cui, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y. Experimental Study on Pot Damage and Contact Stress Distribution Characteristics of Oil Sunflower Plug Seedlings. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 10889. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110889

AMA Style

Zeng F, Li X, Bai H, Cui J, Liu X, Zhang Y. Experimental Study on Pot Damage and Contact Stress Distribution Characteristics of Oil Sunflower Plug Seedlings. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(21):10889. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110889

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeng, Fandi, Xuying Li, Hongbin Bai, Ji Cui, Xuening Liu, and Yongzhi Zhang. 2022. "Experimental Study on Pot Damage and Contact Stress Distribution Characteristics of Oil Sunflower Plug Seedlings" Applied Sciences 12, no. 21: 10889. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110889

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop