Next Article in Journal
A Visual Feedback for Water-Flow Monitoring in Recirculating Aquaculture Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Preliminary Investigation of Geopolymer Foams as Coating Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Investigation on Flow-Induced Rotation of Two Mechanically Tandem-Coupled Cylinders
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gases Emissions during Composting Process of Agri-Food Industry Waste
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Design and Experiment of Black Soldier Fly Frass Mixture Separation through a Cylinder Sieve with Different Rotation Speeds

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(20), 10597; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010597
by Caiwang Peng 1, Ting Zhou 1, Shisheng Song 1, Songlin Sun 1, Yulong Yin 2,* and Daojun Xu 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(20), 10597; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010597
Submission received: 30 August 2022 / Revised: 16 October 2022 / Accepted: 18 October 2022 / Published: 20 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Waste Treatment and Resource Utilization)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The research topic is interesting, the results are also interesting.

However, there would be some things to improve, from my point of view bibliographic sources should be added, to be around 45-50 bibliographic sources.

The images look very good and are very suggestive, they probably still need to be arranged a bit (the images should be properly centered) and some images lack explanations (figure 7, 10, 12).

Otherwise, the work looks fine and the images help a lot.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is correctly written from a scientific point of view. The data and the results are clearly presented. The test methods used are well described.

I recommend publishing this paper if the authors take into consideration the following: 

-         - The equations should be formatted according to the guideline for authors.

-        - The authors could consider improving the conclusions section in order to better emphasize their original contribution to the paper.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop