Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Wearable Sensors in Healthcare Delivery
, Ganesh Kumar 5, Aliyu Nuhu Shuaibu 6, Aliyu Garba 1, Yusra Sahalu 7, Abdullahi Mohammed 1, Tanko Yahaya Mohammed 1, Bashir Abubakar Abdulkadir 8, Abdallah Alkali Abba 9, Nana Aliyu Iliyasu Kakumi 10 and Ahmad Sobri Hashim 5
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The paper is interesting and does a worthwhile job in critiquing "Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Wearable Sensors in Healthcare Delivery." That is, the paper does what its title suggests it will do. In parts the English does not covey what I think the Author's mean to say (it is is parts colloquial and ambiguous) - for example, the word "exonerated" in the first line of the introduction is incorrectly used and the sentence is clumsy. The English detracts from what is in essence a good paper worthy of publication.
Author Response
Dear Sir / Ma,
Please see the attachment.
Kindest Regard.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
1. The abstract indicates the clear condition of examining the sensor applications with some objective patterns. But the objective is not clear, and if it is not given as a separate subsection then it is difficult to recognize. So for better reading, Objectives must be included.
2. In the case of security enhancement in health applications, what is the objective function analytical model?
3. For all the defined advanced method the authors tried to prove it with experimental scenarios and they have integrated it optimization section. But no evaluation metrics for remaining scenarios are present. Therefore the outcome section can be extended.
4. If the research is performed in real time then there is a need to provide some same reference model. In the research article the authors have compared the outcome with other data set which is quite interesting. But it is necessary to add another comparison with any one method with same data set, for example work like, 'Perception Exploration on Robustness Syndromes With Pre-processing Entities Using Machine Learning Algorithm'. Front. Public Heal. 2022 and 'A Radical Safety Measure for Identifying Environmental Changes Using Machine Learning Algorithms' can be compared and analysed.
5. To improve the quality of paper, the authors must add some related articles. This can be in the previous 1-2 years where the same work has been carried out. At least one or two references should be from the current year which shows how contemporary the works are.
6. In the entire paper, many grammatical mistakes are present. The authors must check the quality of the writing.
7. Conclusion section must be enhanced with a separate sub-section like advantages of the proposed method in industrial application etc
Author Response
Dear Sir / Ma,
Please see the attachment.
Kindest Regard.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Review the format and adjust each section to what is established; the abstract should be no more than 200 words.
In line 133, reference must be made to the flowchart as indicated by the format “Figure 1”; review the entire document.
The line break is different in the document, check lines 222 – 236; review the entire document.
Figure 2 is not mentioned in the text; therefore, it is a floating figure that does not contribute to the document.
In the document I have found several of these phrases: “The device consists in general terms of three (3) main components”; because they place the “(3)” in parentheses, they have already said it in the text, there is no need to repeat information; review the entire document.
Figure 3 is not mentioned in the text; therefore, it is a floating figure that does not contribute to the document, it does not have the purpose of placing an image and not using it in the text to explain something.
In line 284 the image must be referenced as indicated by the format “Figure X, etc.”; review the entire document.
Improve the pixelation of figure 5.
This achieved result is five (5) times better compared to a fairly comparable microwire-based biosensor; What does "five (5)" mean? Does it have any relevance?
The paragraph between lines 351 -355 does not have the same format.
The paragraph between lines 360 ​​-368 does not have the same format.
This is correct "In figure 7, the model 396 based on machine learning is represented through wearable sensors for the health system".
Figure 7 is very large, there must be a similarity with the rest of the figures.
The phrase of lines 434 -436 integrated into the subsequent paragraph
You need a discussion section, where you contrast and give importance to your proposal with the existing ones, in such a way that the importance of the method used is established.
The conclusions are individual sentences that do not show the potential of the work or why I should use your method. It has been done generally.
Author Response
Dear Sir / Ma,
Please see the attachment.
Kindest Regard.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments are well incorporated. It can be accepted in this current form.
Reviewer 3 Report
The authors have taken into account all the comments and have reflected them in the document.
