Next Article in Journal
Influence of Masonry Infill Wall Position and Openings in the Seismic Response of Reinforced Concrete Frames
Previous Article in Journal
A Study on Improvement of Motion Sensation for a Vehicle Driving Simulator Based on Specific Force Gain and Tilt Angle Scale Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Torque Reduction of a Reconfigurable Spherical Parallel Mechanism Based on Craniotomy Experimental Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Robotics and Vibration Mechanics

by
Alessandro Gasparetto
1,
Lorenzo Scalera
1,* and
Ilaria Palomba
2
1
Polytechnic Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
2
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(19), 9478; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199478
Submission received: 13 September 2022 / Accepted: 19 September 2022 / Published: 21 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Robotics and Vibration Mechanics)

1. Robotics and Vibration Mechanics

Robotics and vibration mechanics are among the main research areas in mechanical engineering. Robotics includes the design, construction, control, operation, and trajectory planning of autonomous and automatic machines that can substitute or help humans in several tasks in manufacturing processes, dangerous situations, and even in the domestic environment. On the other hand, vibration mechanics investigates the dynamic effects that can arise when flexible mechanical systems are excited by an external time-varying disturbance, or set in motion with an initial input and allowed to vibrate freely.
The growing interest and development of lightweight robots and mechanisms have led to the study and investigation of several aspects of both robotic systems and mechanical vibrations strictly related between them. Indeed, flexibility may lead to undesired mechanical vibrations, especially when lightweight systems performing high-speed operations are considered [1]. Therefore, proper structural design, modelling, and control are required to correctly steer the system during operation.
Compliant mechanisms and robots are characterized by the bending of flexible members. The advantages of this kind of mechanism include, for instance, low weight, low friction, compactness, and reduced power consumption. On the other hand, challenges are mainly related to their nonlinear motion, complex modelling and control.
When dealing with compliant mechanisms, dynamic models become fundamental to predict not only the motion, but also forces and torques acting on the system and those required by the actuators. Several approaches for the dynamic modelling of flexible multibody systems have been developed over the years. Notable formulations include the Floating Frame of Reference [2], the Absolute Coordinate Formulation [3], the Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation [4], and the Equivalent Rigid-Link System [5,6,7].
Compliant mechanism design methods encompass finite element analysis, topology optimization, and pseudo-rigid-body model methods [8]. Design methods can include, for instance, the modal modification of a predefined mechanical system [9], the assignment of proper eigenfrequencies [10], as well as vibration absorption techniques [11]. A further approach that exploits the elastic behavior of a mechanism is the natural motion [12,13], which allows for energy saving in cyclic tasks by properly designing compliant elements [14], and by considering the free vibration response of the system [15].
When dealing with robotic systems and mechanisms in which flexibility cannot be neglected, control is certainly an important and challenging aspect, since a clever control strategy is needed to avoid potential vibration-induced issues [16,17]. Several control strategies have been developed over the years, for instance, adaptive control, feedforward control, model-based control, nonlinear control, optimal control, and PID, among others. However, the problem of control of flexible multibody systems is still an open and challenging field of investigation.
This Special Issue invited researchers to present recent advances and technologies in the fields of robotics and vibration mechanics. Suitable topics included, but were not limited to, the following: robotics and autonomous systems, mechanical vibrations and noise, kinematic and dynamic modeling of robotic systems, path and trajectory planning, automatic control systems, flexible multibody systems, collaborative robotics, design and optimization of robotic and mechatronic systems, mechanisms design, and manufacturing systems.

2. Special Issue

This Special Issue collects papers in open-access format on a broad number of aspects of robotics and vibration mechanics introduced above. The call for the Special Issue Robotics and Vibration Mechanics was open from 8 May 2020 to 27 November 2021, and received 13 manuscript, 9 of which were accepted for publication, with a 69% approval rate. In most of the papers, numerical simulations are corroborated by experimental results. These articles are described in the following in order of publication.
The paper in [18] analyzes the flexible multibody dynamics of a non-symmetric planar parallel manipulator with three degrees of freedom using the Floating Frame of Reference formulation. Numerical simulations are carried out to compare the Rayleigh–Ritz and the finite element approximations, and a sensitivity analysis is performed to investigate how to better increase the rigidity of the links.
The authors of [19] present a multi-criteria motion planning optimization strategy for combining smoothness and speed in collaborative robotics. Thanks to the variational formalism, optimal trajectories are tested with simulations and experiments, by keeping safety requirements for human–robot collaboration into account.
In [20], a vision-based model predictive control for a Schunk PowerCube serial robot is designed with a structured step-by-step procedure. The proposed control allows the robot to sense the environment and to be controlled with visual feedback in real-time. This approach can be suitable for multi-link flexible multibody systems, where joint angles are not sufficient to describe the state of the system due to the elasticity of the links.
The work in [21] investigates the influence of the approach direction on the repeatability of a real industrial robot, namely an ABB IRB 1200. High-speed cameras are used to measure the range of directional deviations and determine the repeatability of the robot end-effector.
The authors of [22] analyze the effects of end-effector compliance on impacts and collisions in robotic teleoperation. An elastic system based on a bi-stable mechanism is proposed to decouple the inertia of the tool from the inertia of the robot and mitigate the effects of potential impacts. Numerical simulations show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
A non-linear control strategy for flexible-link mechanisms is illustrated in [23]. The described controller is model-free and, therefore, does not require the measurement of the elastic deformation of the mechanism. The closed-loop stability of the control approach is evaluated with the Lyapunov theory, and its performance is shown with numerical simulations on a four-bar flexible robotic system.
The paper in [24] reports the design, modelling and experimental evaluation of an amphibious robot that can move both on land and water thanks to a vibration-based mechanism, composed of a micro-DC motor with eccentric mass. Different excitation frequencies are tested on the prototype of the robot, and a good agreement between the numerical model and experimental results is found.
In [25], the authors present a mathematical model for a Formula Student car to investigate the performance of a hydraulically interconnected suspension system with respect to a traditional one. The motion response of the vehicle is tested in simulation using a dynamic model with seven degrees of freedom for each of the two suspension architectures.
The authors of the paper [26] analyze the performance of a reconfigurable spherical parallel mechanism dedicated to craniotomy surgery. Motion capture and force experiments are performed by a neurosurgeon to analyze the kinematic and force interaction between the robot tool and the cranium in surgery with highly real conditions.

3. Final Remarks

This Special Issue collects valuable articles on the topics of robotics and vibration mechanics, spanning several theoretical aspects and applications. In most of the papers collected in the Special Issue, both numerical and experimental results are presented. This Special Issue Robotics and Vibration Mechanics demonstrates the importance and actuality of these topics and provides hints and suggestions for possible future developments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G., L.S. and I.P.; writing—original draft preparation, L.S.; writing—review and editing, A.G., L.S. and I.P.; supervision, project administration, A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The Guest Editors of this Special Issue would like to gratefully thank the authors, who have contributed interesting papers on the subjects of robotics and vibration mechanics. We would like to record our gratefulness to the reviewers, who helped to improve the manuscripts with their feedback and suggestions. Finally, a special thank goes to the editorial and publisher team of Applied Sciences for the support and the help in the publication of this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cleghorn, W.; Fenton, R.; Tabarrok, B. Optimum design of high-speed flexible mechanisms. Mech. Mach. Theory 1981, 16, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shabana, A.A. Flexible multibody dynamics: Review of past and recent developments. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 1997, 1, 189–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gerstmayr, J. The absolute coordinate formulation with elasto-plastic deformations. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 2004, 12, 363–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shabana, A.A. An Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation for the Large Rotation and Deformation Analysis of Flexible Bodies; Technical Report; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago: Chicago, IL, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  5. Vidoni, R.; Gasparetto, A.; Giovagnoni, M. Design and implementation of an ERLS-based 3-D dynamic formulation for flexible-link robots. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2013, 29, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Boscariol, P.; Gallina, P.; Gasparetto, A.; Giovagnoni, M.; Scalera, L.; Vidoni, R. Evolution of a dynamic model for flexible multibody systems. In Advances in Italian Mechanism Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 533–541. [Google Scholar]
  7. Vidoni, R.; Scalera, L.; Gasparetto, A. 3-D ERLS based dynamic formulation for flexible-link robots: Theoretical and numerical comparison between the finite element method and the component mode synthesis approaches. Int. J. Mech. Control. 2018, 19, 39–50. [Google Scholar]
  8. Howell, L.L. Compliant mechanisms. In 21st Century Kinematics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 189–216. [Google Scholar]
  9. Braun, S.; Ram, Y. Modal modification of vibrating systems: Some problems and their solutions. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2001, 15, 101–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Belotti, R.; Palomba, I.; Wehrle, E.; Vidoni, R. An Approximation-Based Design Optimization Approach to Eigenfrequency Assignment for Flexible Multibody Systems. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Richiedei, D.; Tamellin, I. Active approaches to vibration absorption through antiresonance assignment: A comparative study. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Barreto, J.P.; Schöler, F.F.; Corves, B. The concept of natural motion for pick and place operations. In New Advances in Mechanisms, Mechanical Transmissions and Robotics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 89–98. [Google Scholar]
  13. Scalera, L.; Palomba, I.; Wehrle, E.; Gasparetto, A.; Vidoni, R. Natural motion for energy saving in robotic and mechatronic systems. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Carabin, G.; Scalera, L.; Wongratanaphisan, T.; Vidoni, R. An energy-efficient approach for 3D printing with a Linear Delta Robot equipped with optimal springs. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2021, 67, 102045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kashiri, N.; Spyrakos-Papastavridis, E.; Caldwell, D.G.; Tsagarakis, N.G. Exploiting the natural dynamics of compliant joint robots for cyclic motions. In Proceedings of the 2017 22nd International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), Miedzyzdroje, Poland, 28–31 August 2017; pp. 676–681. [Google Scholar]
  16. Benosman, M.; Le Vey, G. Control of flexible manipulators: A survey. Robotica 2004, 22, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Luca, A.D. Trajectory control of flexible manipulators. In Control Problems in Robotics and Automation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1998; pp. 83–104. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rosyid, A.; El-Khasawneh, B. Multibody Dynamics of Nonsymmetric Planar 3PRR Parallel Manipulator with Fully Flexible Links. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rojas, R.A.; Wehrle, E.; Vidoni, R. A multicriteria motion planning approach for combining smoothness and speed in collaborative assembly systems. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fehr, J.; Schmid, P.; Schneider, G.; Eberhard, P. Modeling, simulation, and vision-/MPC-based control of a PowerCube serial robot. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vocetka, M.; Huňady, R.; Hagara, M.; Bobovskỳ, Z.; Kot, T.; Krys, V. Influence of the Approach Direction on the Repeatability of an Industrial Robot. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tommasino, D.; Cipriani, G.; Doria, A.; Rosati, G. Effect of end-effector compliance on collisions in robotic teleoperation. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 9077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Boscariol, P.; Scalera, L.; Gasparetto, A. Nonlinear control of multibody flexible mechanisms: A model-free approach. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cocuzza, S.; Doria, A.; Reis, M. Vibration-based locomotion of an amphibious robot. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pridie, A.C.; Antonya, C. The theoretical study of an interconnected suspension system for a formula student car. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Essomba, T.; Sandoval, J.; Laribi, M.A.; Wu, C.T.; Breque, C.; Zeghloul, S.; Richer, J.P. Torque reduction of a reconfigurable spherical parallel mechanism based on craniotomy experimental data. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gasparetto, A.; Scalera, L.; Palomba, I. Robotics and Vibration Mechanics. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 9478. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199478

AMA Style

Gasparetto A, Scalera L, Palomba I. Robotics and Vibration Mechanics. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(19):9478. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199478

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gasparetto, Alessandro, Lorenzo Scalera, and Ilaria Palomba. 2022. "Robotics and Vibration Mechanics" Applied Sciences 12, no. 19: 9478. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199478

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop