Next Article in Journal
A Performance Evaluation of the Alpha-Beta (α-β) Filter Algorithm with Different Learning Models: DBN, DELM, and SVM
Next Article in Special Issue
A Deep Learning-Based Approach for the Identification of a Multi-Parameter BWBN Model
Previous Article in Journal
Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-Based Dog Activity Detection Using Accelerometer and Gyroscope
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Hysteresis in Engineering Systems

by
Mohammad Noori
1,2,* and
Wael A. Altabey
3,4,*
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405, USA
2
School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
3
International Institute for Urban Systems Engineering (IIUSE), Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
4
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21544, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(19), 9428; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199428
Submission received: 14 September 2022 / Accepted: 17 September 2022 / Published: 20 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hysteresis in Engineering Systems)

1. Hysteresis Introduction

The phenomenon of hysteresis in engineering systems has been with us for ages and has been attracting the attention of many investigators for a long time. The reason is that hysteresis is ubiquitous. It is encountered in many different areas of science. Examples include magnetic hysteresis, ferroelectric hysteresis, mechanical hysteresis, superconducting hysteresis, adsorption hysteresis, optical hysteresis, electron beam hysteresis, etc. However, the very meaning of hysteresis varies from one engineering area to another, from paper to paper, and from author to author. As a result, a stringent mathematical definition of hysteresis is needed in order to avoid confusion and ambiguity. Such a definition will serve a twofold purpose: first, it will be a substitute for vague notions, and, second, it will pave the road for more or less rigorous treatment of hysteresis. The aim of this Special Issue is to gain new, unique knowledge about the hysteresis in engineering systems. Another goal is gathering the main contributions of academics and practitioners in mechanical, aerospace, and civil engineering to provide a common ground for improvements approaches of Hysteresis in Engineering Systems in mechanical, structural, electrical, materials, and other engineering fields. Studies concerning sensor technologies, vibration-based techniques, artificial-intelligence-based methods, and related fields are all welcome, both numerical and experimental.
Understanding the phenomenon of hysteresis and the mechanism of hysteretic behavior is important in the design and analysis of numerous types of engineering systems. Hysteretic behavior is observed in the study of magnetic fields, the dynamic response of many structures under high-intensity cyclic or random loadings, in the force–displacement relationships of vibration-control systems, and in the dynamic response behavior of various connections and fasteners, to cite a few examples. Over the past few decades, a large body of work has been published on the development of mathematical models that can reproduce this behavior for various engineering design and analysis applications, as well as those predicting, for instance, the energy absorption or dissipation characteristics of various hysteretic materials. In recent years, an increasing body of work has also been published on the use of various data analysis methods for modeling and analyzing this highly nonlinear behavior. Hysteresis loops describe the system response of a sample exposed to one of different load types such as stresses in mechanical systems, magnetic field in magnetic system, and current in electrical system, etc. The shape of a hysteresis loop can be diagnostic of the systems. Magnetic systems tend to produce narrow loops, whereas mechanical systems cause wider hysteresis loops. A typical hysteresis loop of different systems modeling is shown in Figure 1.

2. Objectives

The main objective of this proposed Special Issue is to collect contributions from active researchers in the field of hysteresis and from structural, electrical, materials, and other engineering fields. It will act as a platform for sharing, for instance, the latest developments in this field, including new modeling techniques, or the system identification of complex hysteresis models. Given the interdisciplinary nature of this topic, the proposed Issue will be a collection of contributions from scholars in several fields and will cover topics such as: Nonlinear phenomena in hysteretic systems [1]; Hysteresis in the study of magnetic fields [2]; Analytical models for predicting and analyzing hysteretic behavior [3]; The role of hysteretic restoring force on modal interactions [4]; Hysteresis in mechanical systems modeling and dynamic response [5,6,7]; Hysteresis modeling applications in electrical engineering [8]; Advances in hysteresis modelling [9]; The use of smart materials in the modelling of hysteresis systems [10]; Hysteresis and its measurement [11]; Artificial-intelligence-based methods for modeling hysteresis [12,13]; System identification of hysteretic systems [14,15,16,17]; Hysteresis in seismic analysis [18,19]; Study of the Bouc–Wen–Baber–Noori model and its applications [20]; the Prandtl–Ishlinski model for modeling asymmetric hysteresis [1,13]; Hysteresis in control systems [18,19]; and Random vibration of hysteretic systems [21].
Hysteresis in a system is often the macroscopic effect of complex phenomena taking place on a smaller scale. While studying the causes of hysteresis requires microscale experiments and models, hysteresis itself can often be studied directly at the system scale. It is therefore customary for researchers in fields where hysteresis is observed to engage in modeling and experiments at both scales. Whereas the study of hysteresis in the field of magnetic materials is well established and can be considered a standard subject, this is not the case in the field of mechanics, where hysteresis is also relevant.

3. Conclusions

To the knowledge of the guest editors of this Special Issue, hysteresis in engineering systems may be a desirable or undesirable characteristic of a system. Hysteresis may be intentionally designed into a system to reduce sensitivity to noise or time lag. In addition, entering artificial intelligence (AI) techniques into hysteresis modeling and simulation proves that the error of the modeling can be reduced, the precision can be improved, and the effect is better than conventional ones. In this Special Issue, we aimed to collect contributions from active researchers in the field of hysteresis in mechanical, structural, electrical, materials, and other engineering systems. It will act as a platform for sharing such knowledge. Furthermore, researchers may give transparent views and indices for their research areas through the challenges and opportunities. In short, this sharing can help researchers to develop new ideas, particularly in the early stages of this research field. It is hoped that the hysteresis models undertaken in this Special Issue will bring much needed clarity into this area and will make it appealing to the broader audience of inquiring researchers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.A.A. and M.N.; writing—original draft preparation, W.A.A. and M.N.; writing—review and editing, W.A.A. and M.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, T.; Noori, M.; Altabey, W.A.; Li, Z. Parameter Identification and Dynamic Response Analysis of a Modified Prandtl-Ishlinskii Asymmetric Hysteresis Model via Least-Mean Square algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl. 2021, 235, 2639–2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. D’Aloia, A.G.; Francesco, A.D.; Santis, V.D. A Novel Computational Method to Identify/Analyze Hysteresis Loops of Hard Magnetic Materials. Magnetochemistry 2021, 7, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, X.; Huang, Y.; Chen, C.; Lu, J.; Fan, X. Experimental study and analytical modeling on hysteresis behavior of plain concrete in uniaxial cyclic tension. Int. J. Fatigue 2017, 96, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Casini, P.; Vestroni, F. The role of the hysteretic restoring force on modal interactions in nonlinear dynamics. Int. J. Non-Linear Mechanics 2022, 143, 104029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ying, Z.; Mohammad, N.; Seyed, B.B.; Altabey, W.A. Mode shape based damage identification for a reinforced concrete beam using wavelet coefficient differences and multi-resolution analysis. J. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2017, 25, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ying, Z.; Mohammad, N.; Altabey, W.A. Damage detection for a beam under transient excitation via three different algorithms. J. Struct. Eng. Mech. 2017, 63, 803–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ying, Z.; Mohammad, N.; Altabey, W.A.; Awad, T. A Comparison of Three Different Methods for the Identification of Hysterically Degrading Structures Using BWBN Model. J. Front. Built Environ. Sect. Comput. Methods Struct. Eng. 2019, 4, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Harrison, R.G.; Steentjes, S. Simplification and inversion of the mean-field positive-feedback model: Application to constricted major and minor hysteresis loops in electrical steels. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 491, 165552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ktena, A.; Fotiadis, D.I.; Massalas, C.V. Hysteresis Modeling and Applications. Adv. Scatt. Biomed. Eng. 2004, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, Z.; Wu, Y.; Fang, Z.; Sun, H. Modeling and compensation of hysteresis in piezoelectric actuators. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Herres, D. Hysteresis and Its Measurement, Article in Test and Measurement Tips. 2020. Available online: https://www.testandmeasurementtips.com/hysteresis-and-its-measurement-faq/ (accessed on 1 September 2022).
  12. Wang, T.; Li, H.; Noori, M.; Ghiasi, R.; Kuok, S.-C.; Altabey, W.A. Probabilistic Seismic Response Prediction of Three-Dimensional Structures Based on Bayesian Convolutional Neural Network. Sensors 2022, 22, 3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, T.; Altabey, W.A.; Noori, M.; Ghiasi, R. A Deep Learning Based Approach for Response Prediction of Beam-Like Structures. Struct. Durab. Health Monit. 2020, 14, 315–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ghiasi, R.; Noori, M.; Altabey, W.A.; Silik, A.; Wang, T.; Wu, Z. Uncertainty Handling in Structural Damage Detection via Non-Probabilistic Meta-Models and Interval Mathematics, a Data-Analytics Approach. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ghiasi, R.; Noori, M.; Altabey, W.A.; Wang, T.; Wu, Z. Uncertainty Handling in Structural Damage Detection using Non-Probabilistic Meta-Model and interval mathematics. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure: Transferring Research into Practice, SHMII 2021, Porto, Portugal, 30 June–2 July 2021; Volume 2021, pp. 819–824. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ghiasi, R.; Noori, M.; Kuok, S.-C.; Silik, A.; Wang, T.; Pozo, F.; Altabey, W.A. Structural Assessment under Uncertain Parameters via the Interval Optimization Method Using the Slime Mold Algorithm. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Silik, A.; Noori, M.; Altabey, W.; Ghiasi, R.; Wu, Z.; Dang, J. Evaluation of analytic wavelet parameters effet for data analyses in civil structural heath monitoring. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure: Transferring Research into Practice, SHMII 2021, Porto, Portugal, 30 June–2 July 2021; Volume 2021, pp. 813–818. [Google Scholar]
  18. Altabey, W.A.; Noori, M.; Li, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Aval, S.B.B.; Noroozinejad Farsangi, E.; Ghiasi, R.; Silik, A. A Novel MRE Adaptive Seismic Isolator Using Curvelet Transform Identification. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, Y.; Noori, M.; Altabey, W.A. Reaching Law Based Sliding Mode Control for a Frame Structure under Seismic Load. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 2021, 20, 727–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Z.; Noori, M.; Zhao, Y.; Wan, C.; Feng, D.; Altabey, W.A. A multi-objective optimization algorithm for Bouc–Wen–Baber–Noori model to identify reinforced concrete columns failing in different modes. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl. 2021, 235, 2165–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lin, Y.K.; Cai, G.Q. Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems. In Nonlinear Dynamics in Engineering Systems. International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics; Schiehlen, W., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Hysteresis loop of different systems modeling: (a) Mechanical damping system; (b) Electrical system; (c) Magnetic system.
Figure 1. Hysteresis loop of different systems modeling: (a) Mechanical damping system; (b) Electrical system; (c) Magnetic system.
Applsci 12 09428 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Noori, M.; Altabey, W.A. Hysteresis in Engineering Systems. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 9428. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199428

AMA Style

Noori M, Altabey WA. Hysteresis in Engineering Systems. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(19):9428. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199428

Chicago/Turabian Style

Noori, Mohammad, and Wael A. Altabey. 2022. "Hysteresis in Engineering Systems" Applied Sciences 12, no. 19: 9428. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199428

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop