Next Article in Journal
Synthesized Transmitting Coil for Magnetic Focusing of Pulsed Eddy Current for Downhole Casing Inspection
Next Article in Special Issue
Determination of Benefits of the Application of CMMS Database Improvement Proposals
Previous Article in Journal
Inferential Statistics Is an Unfit Tool for Interpreting Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Human-Related Hazardous Events Assessment for Suffocation on Ships by Integrating Bayesian Network and Complex Network
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Maximum Safe Parameters of Ships in Complex Systems of Port Waterways

Faculty of Navigation, Maritime University of Szczecin, 70-500 Szczecin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(15), 7692; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157692
Submission received: 27 June 2022 / Revised: 27 July 2022 / Accepted: 28 July 2022 / Published: 30 July 2022

Abstract

:
Context: From the perspective of marine traffic engineering, a system of port waterways is composed of a set of waterways (port areas), such as approach channels, port entrance, inner fairways (port channels, rivers, lakes), turning basins and port basins of various terminals. The sea waterway must be adjusted to the navigation of specific types of ships, characterized by length, breadth, draft and airdraft. The primary requirement for shipping in sea waterways is the safety of navigation. Each sea waterway has traffic restrictions for the ships using it. These restrictions are called conditions of sea waterway operation or conditions of ship operation in the sea waterway. Problem: There are a number of empirical, deterministic or probabilistic methods to determine the safe width of maneuvering areas on port waterways. The direct application of empirical methods to determine the conditions for the safe operation of ships on the complex waterway, such as the Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway, was impossible due to the complexity of the waterway and various restrictions on its individual parts. Method: The paper presents the assumptions and calculation procedure of a method allowing for the determination of maximum safe parameters of ships in existing complex waterways. Results: The proposed method was used in the preparation of port regulations for the dredged and widened Świnoujście–Szczecin waterway. The results of these calculations are presented as a practical application of the method. Conclusions: This article defines conditions for the safe operation of ships in complex port waterways systems and presents the methodology for determining maximum safe parameters of ships in existing complex port waterways systems.

1. Introduction

1.1. Waterway System in Marine Traffic Engineering

The sea waterway must be adjusted to the navigation of specific type of ships, characterized by length, breadth, draft and airdraft [1]. The primary requirement for shipping in sea waterways is the safety of navigation [2]. Navigational safety comprises all of the issues related to smooth ship conduct from point A to point B of the sea route.
The sea waterway system in marine traffic engineering is composed of a number of separate sections (n). A complex port waterways system is usually composed of the following sections:
  • Approach channel;
  • Port entrance;
  • A number of straight sections and bends in the fairway;
  • Port basins of specific terminals and related turning basins.
Each of the waterway sections consist of three basic elements [3]:
  • Waterway subsystem;
  • Subsystem of ship position determination (navigational subsystem);
  • Subsystem of traffic control.
These elements affect each other and have an important impact on the system characteristics.
Each sea waterway has traffic restrictions for the ships using it [4,5]. These restrictions are called conditions of sea waterway operation or conditions of ship operation in the sea waterway, and refer to:
  • Parameters of ships using the waterway;
  • Hydrometeorological conditions, in which, the traffic includes specific types of ships;
  • Parameters of vessel traffic intensity in the waterway;
  • Conditions of ship maneuvering in the waterway (tug assistance, allowable speeds).
The conditions for the safe operation of ships in a port regarded as a system composed of various types of waterways are dependent on the conditions of the safe operation of ships in each specific waterway section within the port. The parameters of each waterway within the port determine the conditions of the safe operation of ships maneuvering in that area [6].
There are a number of empirical, deterministic or probabilistic methods to determine the safe width of maneuvering areas on port waterways [3]. The most important methods include:
  • PIANC;
  • ROM (Spanish);
  • Japanese;
  • CIRM (Centrum Inżynierii Ruchu Morskiego).
They are widely used, in particular, at the preliminary stage of waterway design. For example, the most widely known PIANC method was used during the initial localization of the LNG terminal in India [7] to determine the approach fairway in the Chinese port of Panjin [8] and to determine the parameters of fairways in Korean waters [9]. However, the use of these methods was limited to determining the parameters of one or a maximum of several types (sections) of waterways (e.g., straight sections, bends, turning basins).
The direct application of the above methods to determine the conditions for the safe operation of ships on a complex waterway, such as the Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway, was impossible due to the complexity of the waterway and various restrictions on its individual parts.
This article:
  • Defines conditions for the safe operation of ships in complex port waterways systems;
  • Presents the methodology for determining maximum safe parameters of ships in existing complex port waterways systems.

1.2. Conditions of Safe Operation of Ships in Port Waterways Systems

From the perspective of marine traffic engineering, a system of port waterways is composed of a set of waterways (port areas), such as approach channels, port entrance, inner fairways (port channels, rivers, lakes), turning basins and port basins of various terminals.
In a port regarded as a system of sea waterways, different areas make up separate waterway sections that can be grouped into several criteria [3]:
  • Technical parameters of the port area;
  • Technical parameters of navigation systems used;
  • Prevailing hydrometeorological conditions;
  • Conditions of safe operation.
The conditions for the safe operation of ships in the i-th section of the waterway can be written as a set:
W i = [ t y p , L c i , B i , T i , H s t i , V i , C i , H i ]
where:
typType of ‘maximum ship’;
LciOverall length of ‘maximum ship’;
BiBreadth of ‘maximum ship’;
TiDraft of ‘maximum ship’ in i-th section of waterway;
HstiAirdraft in i-th section of waterway (useful while passing under a bridge or overhead power line);
ViAllowable speed of ‘maximum ship’ in i-th fairway section;
CiTug assistance in i-th section of fairway, if it is required (required number and bollard pull of tugs);
HiSet of hydrometeorological conditions acceptable for ‘maximum ship’ in i-th fairway section.
H i = [ d / n i , s i ,   Δ h i ,   V w i , V p i ,   h f i ]
where:
d/niAllowable time of day in i-th section of waterway;
siAllowable visibility in i-th section of waterway;
ΔhiAllowable drop of water level in i-th section of fairway;
VwiAllowable wind speed in i-th section of fairway;
VpiAllowable speed of current in i-th section of fairway;
hfiAllowable wave height in i-th section of fairway.
The conditions for the safe operation of ships passing through the waterways system consisting of a set of n sections can be written in this form:
W = [ t y p , L c , B , T , H s t , V i , C i , H ]
where:
typType of ‘maximum ship’;
LcMaximum overall length of ships that can safely pass through the waterway system (port entrances);
BMaximum breadth of ships that can safely pass through the waterway system;
TMaximum draft of ships that can safely pass through the waterway system;
HstMaximum airdraft of ships that can safely pass through the waterway system.
H = [ d / n ,   s ,   V w ]
where:
d/nAllowable time of day in the waterway system;
sAllowable visibility in the waterway system;
VwAllowable wind speed in the waterway system.
Additional restrictions may occur, causing temporary changes in vessel traffic in the waterway system (or restrictions of maximum ship parameters). These are:
  • Drop in water level in specific sections (Δhi);
  • Exceeded speed of the sea current in specific sections (Vpi);
  • Exceeded wave height in specific sections (hfi).
The conditions for the safe operation of ships, defining the parameters of waterway system components, are defined separately for one-way and two-way traffic. In two-way traffic sections, the conditions for the safe operation of fairways can be written as follows:
W i = f 2 [ t y p i n , L c i n , B i n , T i n , V i i n , C i i n , H t y p o u t , L c o u t , B o u t , T o u t , V i o u t , C i o u t , H ]
where in means a ship entering the port and out refers to a departing ship.
The state vector of safe ship operation conditions in waterway systems is a function of the parameters of this system [10,11]:
W = F   [ A i N i Z i ]
where:
WConditions of safe ship operation (state vector);
AiSubsystem of i-th section of the waterway, determining the area parameters and the type of maneuver performed in that area (area subsystem);
NiSubsystem of ship position determination, characterizing parameters of navigational systems in use (navigational system);
ZiSubsystem of traffic control, characterizing its parameters and waterway capacity.
In cases where port waterways are covered by the identical system of regulations, each of the waterway sections consist of two basic components [12,13]:
  • Waterway subsystem;
  • Navigational subsystem (ship position determination subsystem).
These elements affect each other and have a vital impact on the system characteristics.
The parameters of subsystems of individual port waterway sections determine the conditions for the safe operation of ships in the waterway system:
W = F   [ A i N i ]
Conditions for the safe operation of ships in seaports are subject to two restrictions [11,12]:
  • The basic maximum parameters of ships that can safely pass through the waterway system cannot be greater than maximum parameters of ships safely passing through all of the sections of the system. Therefore:
    L c = min i L c i B = min i B i T = min i T i
  • The hydrometeorological conditions that allow for maneuvering in the given waterway system of ships with maximum parameters are identical. This applies to the time of day (d/n), visibility (s) and wind speed (Vw).

2. Methods

The problem of maximum safe parameters of ships arises in the case of the construction, conversion or modernization of a port waterways system. This particularly applies to complex port waterways systems, composed of several port basins (cargo handling terminals), fairways (straight sections and bends) and turning basins.
Individual sections of waterways (system components) differ in technical and operational parameters:
  • Cargo-handling terminals (port basins): type and maximum parameters of ships handled (typ, LC, B, T);
  • Fairways (bends and straight sections): depth (h), width at bottom (D) and slope angle;
  • Turning basins: depth (h), length and width (lobr, bobr,) or diameter.
In addition, mooring ships are taken into account in port basins and quays or piers located along the fairways of the system, anchorages and lay-by berths.
A complex port waterway system is usually composed of the following sections:
  • Approach channel (from an anchorage);
  • Port entrance;
  • A number of inner fairway sections leading to various terminals;
  • Port basins of the terminals;
  • Turning basins for ships handled at a given terminal.
In order to take into account all constraints on individual sections of the fairway, the following procedure is proposed. It allows us to determine the maximum safe parameters of ships that may use the system between specific turning basins:
  • Preliminary determination of ships’ maximum drafts in specific fairway sections:
    T w i = h i Δ w i
The underkeel clearance Δ w i was determined for the pre-defined ship speed V w i .
2.
Determination of maximum overall lengths L c o of ships in turning basins, taking into account the possibility of turning in port basins of the terminals; location of turning basins in the fairway accounting for the length overall of ships safely turned:
L c o m a x , ,   L c o m i n
It was assumed that maximum lengths of turning ships decrease along with the increase in turning basin distance from the fairway entrance.
3.
The division of the fairway into sections between the turning basins (j turning basins):
  • First section: from port entrance (into fairway) to the turning basin where the maximum length ship can be turned ( L c o m a x );
  • Next sections were determined between subsequent turning basins in the fairway.
Further calculations were made separately for each section between the turning basins.
4.
Determination of length overall L c z and breadth of B z of ships safely maneuvering in fairway bends (z). Making calculations by starting from the turning basin where a vessel of greater length can turn, we should assume the safe overall length and breadth of the ship on the fairway section running from the considered turning basin as:
L c z a k = min z L c z
B z a k = min z B z
5.
Determination of maximum safe breadths of ships in straight one-way fairway sections ( B p ); here, we should assume the safe ship breadth for all straight fairway sections (p) from the considered turning basin as:
B p r = min p B p
6.
Determination of maximum safe lengths and breadths of ships in particular sections between the considered j-th turning basin:
L c j = L c z a k   for   L c j < L c o j
B j = min ( B z a k , B p r )
7.
Determination of ship’s safe draft and allowable speeds in specific fairway sections of the considered waterway, taking into account ship and fairway section parameters. The ship speed in individual waterway sections is calculated from this formula:
T i = h i Δ i
The underkeel clearance is a function of ship speed and other parameters, fairway parameters and the performed maneuver:
Δ i = f ( V i )
The maximum safe draft of the ship in the considered j-th section of the waterway to be assumed:
T i = min i T i
8.
Determination of maximum parameters of two-way traffic in each fairway section.
9.
Determination of the conditions of safe operation of ships passing through the waterway system between the examined turning basins:
W j = [ t y p j , L c j , B j , T j , H s r , V i , C i , H ]
The algorithm of the parameters determination is shown in Figure 1.
Notably, safe parameters of ships (Lc, B) maneuvering in turning basins and fairway bends can be determined by simulation or empirical methods [3,14,15]. Simulation methods using full mission bridge simulators are more accurate than empirical methods. In straight sections of the fairway, empirical methods are sufficiently accurate.

3. Results

The developed method for determining the maximum safe parameters of ships in complex port waterways systems was used for the calculation of the conditions for safe ship operations in the modernized Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway, dredged from 10.5 m to 12.5 m and widened. The requirements for determining the conditions for the safe operation of ships included parameters of ‘maximum ships’ passing through this fairway.
The modernized Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway is 68 km in length, and 12.5 m deep. It includes the Świnoujście entrance channel and a number of straight sections and bends with various technical parameters. The main sections of the fairway, together with their parameters, are shown in Table 1. The basic sections are connected with transition sections, on which, fairway parameters change. The whole waterway system comprises four turning basins. In addition, turning is possible in the Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway for ships entering and departing from two other ports (Figure 2):
  • Police (49.4 km of the fairway), handling bulk carriers, chemical tankers and LPG tankers;
  • Newly designed Skolwin port (55.7 km) to serve product, chemical and LPG tankers.
Maximum safe parameters of ships passing through the Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway were determined in a procedure composed of the following steps:
  • Preliminary maximum draft of ships is:
    T w = 11   m  
    where the underkeel clearance (Δwi = 1.5 m) was calculated using the method of components and adopting:
    • Preliminary ship speed in individual sections Vi = 8 knots;
    • Water level drop Δhi = −0.5 m [16,17].
  • The maximum length of ships that can safely turn in four Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway turning basins is, respectively:
    • Northern Turning Basin (1.7 km of the fairway), Lco = 300 m, Bo = 50 m—bulk carriers under ballast;
    • Mielińska Turning Basin (4.9 km of fairway), Lco = 270 m, Bo = 40 m, To = 11.0 m;
    • Przesmyk Orli Turning Basin (63.7 km), Lco = 260 m, Bo = 33 m, To = 9.0 m—cruise ships and Lco = 250 m, Bo = 33 m, To = 11.0 m—container ships
    • Parnica Turning Basin (67.3 km of the fairway), Lco = 230 m, Bo = 33 m, To = 11.0 m—bulk carriers;
    • Port of Police (49.4 km of the fairway), Lco = 230 m, Bo = 33 m, To = 11.0 m—bulk carriers and chemical tankers;
    • Designed Skolwin Port (55.7 km of the fairway), Lco = 230 m, Bo = 35, To = 11.2 m—product tankers and LPG tankers.
The maximum ship lengths in the turning basins of Northern, Mielińska and Przesmyk Orli were determined using simulation methods, whereas the maximum ship length in the Parnica Turning Basin was estimated using the empirical method.
Example results of simulation tests are presented for the Northern Turning Basin. The tests were conducted on the FMBS simulator from Kongsberg. The preliminary assumed conditions for the safe operation of bulk carriers entering the Port of Świnoujście were as follows:
  • Ingoing vessel entering and berthing port side alongside—loaded bulk carrier: Lc = 300 m, T = 13.2 m;
  • Outgoing—bulk carrier under ballast: Lc = 300 m, TD = 7.4 m, TR = 9.0 m; the ship turns around the starboard side in the Northern Turning Basin.
Two simulation models of this bulk carrier were built to conduct three test series of ship arrivals and departures. The simulation experiment consisting of 12 passages in one series was performed by port pilots. Each test series was conducted in different least favorable hydrometeorological conditions. Figure 3 presents statistically developed test results of the port entry by a loaded bulk carrier, and Figure 4 depicts the turning of the bulk carrier under ballast, at wind N 10 m/s and ingoing current 0.8 knots. The test results are shown as safe maneuvering areas determined at three levels of confidence: maximum (red line), mean (green line) and 95% (magenta line).
3.
The maximum overall length and breadth of ships safely maneuvering in fairway bends were determined for fairway sections between the turning basins. The calculations were made in this order:
  • Northern Turning Basin (1.7 km)—port entrance (0.0 km of the fairway). The maximum overall length and breadth of ships entering the port and approaching the Northern Turning Basin were determined by the simulation method (Figure 3), Lc = 300 m, B = 50 m, T = 13.2 m;
  • The Mielińska Turning Basin (4.9 km of the fairway)—Northern Turning Basin. The maximum overall length and breadth of ships safely passing from the Northern to Mielińska Turning Basins were determined by the simulation method Lc = 270 m, B = 40 m, T = 11.0 m [16]. In addition, the navigational risk of maximum ship passage was examined in connection with the planned arrivals of a ferry Lc = 220 m at berth No 2 of the ferry terminal in Świnoujście. The risk that the maneuvering ship moves out of the available navigable area and passenger fatalities occur R = 2.8 × 10−7 [year−1] is lower than the acceptable risk [18].
  • Przesmyk Orli Turning Basin (63.7 km of the fairway)—Mielińska Turning Basin. The maximum overall length L c z a k   and breadth B z a k of ships safely maneuvering in the fairway bends (turns) between Mielińska and Przesmyk Orli Turning Basins were determined by the simulation method. The tests were conducted using a Kongsberg-made FMBS simulator in three fairway bends: Mańków, Ińskie-Babina and Święta. A simulation experiment was conducted for a cruise ship Lc = 260 m, B = 33.0 m, T = 9.0 m, and container ship Lc = 250 m, B = 33.0 m, T = 11.0 m [16]. Two series of tests were conducted in least favorable hydrometeorological conditions for each bend. The simulation experiment consisting of 12 passages in one series was performed by port pilots. Figure 5 shows statistically processed test results for the Święta bend. The results refer to the safe maneuvering areas for a cruise ship L c z a k sailing through the bend in the least favorable hydrometeorological conditions;
  • There are no bends between Parnica (57.3 km) and Przesmyk Orli Turning Basins.
4.
The maximum breadth of ships safely maneuvering in straight fairway sections was determined after transforming the condition of navigational safety, defined in the empirical CIRM method [3,15]. This condition can be written as:
D j d m + 2 d n ( 1 ) + d r p + d r l
where:
DjWidth at bottom of j-th point of the fairway center line for safe depth (available width of the navigable area) [m];
dmDeterministic maneuvering component of the swept path width [m];
dn(1− α)Probabilistic navigational component of the swept path width [m] of the ship at a given confidence level (1-α) [m];
d r p Reserve of maneuvering area width on the right-hand side [m];
d r l Reserve of maneuvering area width on the left-hand side [m];
The maneuvering component is the sum of the basic width of the swept path dmp and additional corrections of the swept path width dmd
d m = d m p + d m d
while:
d m p = k · B
where:
kCoefficient determining the ship’s maneuverability, dependent on ship type k = f (typ).
Additional corrections of the swept path width depend on the ship speed, technical parameters of the fairway and hydrometeorological conditions, i.e.:
d m d = f ( V i , A i ,   H i )
The width allowances depend on the ship speed and technical parameters of the fairway:
d r = f ( V i ,   A )
The navigational component is determined by the subsystem of ship position determination in the given fairway section.
d n = f ( N i )
Transforming this relationship (20) leads to the determination of the maximum safe width of the ship in straight fairway sections between the turning areas: (p sections):
B p = ( D p d m d 2 d n ( 1 ) d r p d r l ) / k
where all data necessary for determining the right-hand side terms of the equation are known:
B p = f   ( A i , N i ,   H i , V w i , t y p )
and these were used to determine the maximum safe breadths Bp of ships in each section and between the examined turning areas   B p r .
B p r = min p B p
5.
Maximum safe lengths, breadths and drafts of ships between Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway turning areas were calculated as above and are equal to:
  • Northern Turning Area—port entrance channel: Lc = 300 m, B = 50 m, T =13.2 m;
  • Mielińska to Northern Turning Areas: Lc = 270 m, B = 40 m, T = 11.0 m;
  • Przesmyk Orli to Mielińska Turning Areas:
    • Lc = 260 m, B = 33 m, T = 9.0 m—cruise carrier;
    • Lc = 240 m, B = 33 m, T = 11.0 m—container ship;
    • Lc = 230 m, B = 33 m, T = 11.0 m—bulk carrier;
  • Parnica to Przesmyk Orli Turning Areas: Lc = 230 m, B = 33 m, T = 11.0 m—bulk carrier.
6.
Safe allowable speeds of ships in specific sections of the Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway were determined by starting from the basic condition of navigational safety
T h Δ
where:
ΔUnderkeel clearance.
There are two methods for determining the underkeel clearance:
  • Static method;
  • Dynamic method.
The safe allowable speeds of ships in specific fairway sections were determined using the static method of components [15]. In the method, the allowance Δ was divided into two components: static allowance Δs and dynamic allowance Δd:
The static allowance does not depend on ship movement and is constant for the given area and the ship. Its components include:
Δ1Water allowance for sounding error, depending on the depth of the area;
Δ2Navigational allowance due to the discontinuity of soundings;
Δ3Allowance for siltation, depending on the area;
Δ4Allowance for the height of tide determination error, depending on the shipping area;
Δ5Allowance for the error of water level determination due to water level fluctuations relative to chart datum;
Δ6Allowance for the draft determination error, depending on the type of ship;
Δ7Allowance for ship’s list assessment error, depending on ship parameters.
The components of the dynamic allowance include:
Δ8Allowance for moving ship squat, depending on ship’s speed, draft, depth and other area parameters;
Δ9Allowance for waves, depending on wave and ship parameters.
In the Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway, no water allowance for waves (Δ9 = 0) was made, so the condition of navigational safety can be written as:
T h l = 1 7 Δ l Δ 8
The underkeel clearance was determined by five empirical methods recommended by PIANC in the given conditions [19]:
  • Tuck;
  • Huuska/Guliev;
  • ICORELS;
  • Barras3;
  • Eryuzlu2.
It was calculated for container ships (block coefficient Cb = 0.62) and bulk carriers (Cb = 0.8) by adopting appropriate bottom profiles for individual fairway sections. Given the obtained results, specific safe allowable speeds were identified in all fairway sections. For ships T > 10 m, the following values apply:
  • Container ships, general cargo ships, LPG tankers (Cb ≤ 0.65) V = 8 to 12 knots;
  • Bulk carriers, tankers (Cb ≥ 0.75) V = 6 to 10 knots.
The guidelines were also formulated for the implementation of the dynamic underkeel clearance system, which will increase the allowable maximum draft to T = 11.2 m.
7.
The passing of two ships in the Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway require the determination of maximum safe breadths of the meeting ships, depending on their draft and the fairway channel slope (Table 2).
The breadths of ships safely passing each other in straight fairway sections were determined based on the condition of the navigational safety of two-way traffic [13]:
D i t d m i n + d m o u t + 2 d n ( 1 ) i n + 2 d n ( 1 ) o u t + d r i n + d r o u t + d r s
where:
D i t Width of available navigable area for ships with draft T in i-th section of the fairway;
d r s Separation zone allowing for the suction force effect;
in, outIndices marking incoming and outgoing ships.

4. Discussion

The main objective of the research presented in the article is to develop a general method for determining the maximum parameters of ships in complex port water systems. This goal was achieved by developing a computational procedure (algorithm) that takes into account various constraints specific to individual sections of the fairway. The developed method stands out from the methods known in the literature (PIANC, ROM, Japanese, CIRM), which focus on determining the maximum parameters of a ship on individual types of waterways, but do not include the procedure for their use for complex waterways.
The developed method was used to determine the conditions for the safe operation of ships on the modernized Szczecin–Świnoujście fairway. The obtained results showed that the deepening and widening of the waterway will, obviously, allow for the passage of larger ships. However, the increase in ship dimensions relates more to the draft and length of the ship than to its breadth. For example, for the port of Szczecin, the maximum vessel draft increased from 9.15 m to 11.0 m and the length from 215 m to 260 m, and the width of the maximum vessel only increased from 31 m to 33 m. This is due to the fact that the horizontal dimensions of the safe maneuvering area depend not only on the width of the vessel, but also on its length, the draft ratio and the available depth.
The proposed method does not introduce new dependencies allowing for the determination of safe ship parameters, but, thanks to the systematization of calculations, it allows for the determination of these parameters on complex waterways. The limitations of its use result from the limitations of the detailed methods used; however, due to the possibility of using various methods (both empirical and simulation), it can be treated as a universal method allowing for the determination of safe parameters of ships on complex waterways. In the future, work on the development of this method will focus on the partial automation of calculations, which will allow us to shorten the time necessary to obtain results.
In conclusion, the developed method allows us to determine the maximum safe parameters of ships in complex port waters, which has been practically confirmed by defining the conditions for the safe operation of ships on the modernized Szczecin–Świnoujście fairway.

5. Conclusions

The article presents a new method for determining the maximum safe parameters of ships in existing complex port waterway systems and the conditions for safe ship operations.
The developed method can be described with the following general procedure:
  • The determination of maximum safe lengths of ships in specific turning basins and ship drafts;
  • The waterway division between turning basins, depending on the maximum length of ships turned there;
  • The determination of maximum lengths and breadths of ships safely maneuvering in fairway bends (turns) between the turning basins;
  • The determination of maximum safe breadths of ships in straight fairway sections between the turning basins;
  • The determination of the allowable speed of ships in specific fairway sections;
  • The determination of ship parameters in two-way traffic lanes;
  • The determination of conditions for the safe operation of ships in a complex port waterway system.
The prosed method was used for the determination of conditions for the safe operation of ships on the modernized 68-kilometer Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway. The modernization of the fairway resulted in deepening the channel from 10.5 m to 12.5 m and an appropriate widening of the channel. By dredging the fairway to 12.5 m, the maximum permissible draught of vessels calling at Szczecin was increased to approx. 11.0 m (before 9.15 m), and, thus, the availability of the Szczecin port to a certain group of large vessels was ensured. There will be no need for them to be discharged at Świnoujście before continuing on to the Szczecin port.
The results were used to draw up detailed port regulations defining the conditions for safe fairway operations of ships heading for the ports of Świnoujście, Szczecin, Police and Skolwin.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G.; methodology, S.G.; software, M.G., R.G. and M.P.; validation, S.G.; formal analysis, S.G., M.G., R.G. and M.P.; investigation, S.G., M.G., R.G. and M.P.; resources, R.G. and M.P.; data curation, M.G, R.G. and M.P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.G.; writing—review and editing, M.G., R.G. and M.P.; visualization, M.P.; supervision, S.G.; project administration, R.G. and M.P.; funding acquisition, M.G., R.G. and M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Olba, X.B.; Daamen, W.; Vellinga, T.; Hoogendoorn, S.P. State-of-the-Art of Port Simulation Models for Risk and Capacity Assessment Based on the Vessel Navigational Behaviour through the Nautical Infrastructure. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. (Engl. Ed.) 2018, 5, 335–347. [Google Scholar]
  2. Formela, K.; Weintrit, A.; Neumann, T. Overview of Definitions of Maritime Safety, Safety at Sea, Navigational Safety and Safety in General. TransNav Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp. 2019, 13, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gucma, S.; Zalewski, P. Optimization of Fairway Design Parameters: Systematic Approach to Manoeuvring Safety. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean. Eng. 2020, 12, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Reshnyak, V.; Sokolov, S.; Nyrkov, A.; Budnik, V. Inland Waterway Environmental Safety. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1015, 042049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Froese, J. Safe and Efficient Port Approach by Vessel Traffic Management in Waterways. In Transport of Water versus Transport over Water: Exploring the Dynamic Interplay of Transport and Water; Ocampo-Martinez, C., Negenborn, R.R., Eds.; Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 281–296. ISBN 978-3-319-16133-4. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shang, J.; Wang, W.; Peng, Y.; Tian, Q.; Tang, Y.; Guo, Z. Simulation Research on the Influence of Special Ships on Waterway through Capacity for a Complex Waterway System: A Case Study for the Port of Meizhou Bay. Simulation 2020, 96, 387–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rushidh, M.D.; Suhuraa, S.; Reddya, L.R.; Dwarakisha, G.S. Planning of Marine Facilities for an LNG Terminal in India. In Proceedings of the GITA-2K15, SMVITM, Bantakal, India, 16–17 October 2015. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, L. Discussion on the Method for Determining the Harbor Channel Design Width-Take the Proposed 250,000 ton Waterway of Panjin Harbor for Instance. Adv. Mater. Res. 2015, 1065, 480–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kang, W.S.; Park, Y.S. A Study on the Design of Coastal Fairway Width Based on a Risk Assessment Model in Korean Waterways. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gucma, S.; Gralak, R.; Muczyński, B. Areas of Emergency Maneuvers and the Navigational Risk of Accidents in Fairways Due to Ship Technical Failures Determined by the Ship Movement Simulation Method. Zesz. Nauk. Akad. Mor. Szczec. 2020, 61, 39–47. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gucma, S. Conditions of Safe Ship Operation in Seaports–Optimization of Port Waterway Parameters. Pol. Marit. Res. 2019, 3, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Gucma, S.; Gralak, R. Probabilistic-Deterministic Method of Rescaling Ship Manoeuvring Simulation Data Defining Parameters of Fairway Bends. New Trends Prod. Eng. 2018, 1, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Akram, M.A.; Liu, P.; Wang, Y.; Qian, J. GNSS Positioning Accuracy Enhancement Based on Robust Statistical MM Estimation Theory for Ground Vehicles in Challenging Environments. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Thoresen, C.A. Port Designer’s Handbook; Thomas Telford: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gucma, S. Studying Sea Waterway System with the Aid of Computer Simulation Methods. Pol. Marit. Res. 2015, 22, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Maritime University of Szczecin (Szczecin, Poland). Navigational Analysis of Modernization of the Waterway Swinoujscie-Szczecin (Deepening to 12.5 m). 2015; not intended for publication. [Google Scholar]
  17. Maritime University of Szczecin (Szczecin, Poland). Analysis of Ship Operation Safety in the Świnoujście—Szczecin Fairway. 2021; not intended for publication. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bąk, A.; Gucma, S.; Przywarty, M. The Safety of Navigation in Restricted Areas—Method of Risk Estimation and Analysis. Maritime University of Szczecin: Szczecin, Poland, 2022; Unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  19. McBride, M.; Boll, M.; Briggs, M. Harbour Approach Channels—Design Guidelines; PIANC: Brussels, Belgium, 2014. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The algorithm of the process of determining maximum parameters of the ship in complex port waterways systems.
Figure 1. The algorithm of the process of determining maximum parameters of the ship in complex port waterways systems.
Applsci 12 07692 g001
Figure 2. A simplified model of the complex port waterways system (four terminals).
Figure 2. A simplified model of the complex port waterways system (four terminals).
Applsci 12 07692 g002
Figure 3. Safe maneuvering areas of the loaded carrier Lc = 300 m, T = 13.5 m at the entrance to Port Świnoujście. Wind N 10 m/s, ingoing current 0.8 knots, UTM coordinates (zone 33U).
Figure 3. Safe maneuvering areas of the loaded carrier Lc = 300 m, T = 13.5 m at the entrance to Port Świnoujście. Wind N 10 m/s, ingoing current 0.8 knots, UTM coordinates (zone 33U).
Applsci 12 07692 g003
Figure 4. Safe maneuvering areas of turning in the Northern Turning Basin in Świnoujście, bulk carrier under ballast Lc = 300 m, TD = 7.4 m, TR = 9.0 m/s, ingoing current 0.8 knots, UTM coordinates (zone 33U).
Figure 4. Safe maneuvering areas of turning in the Northern Turning Basin in Świnoujście, bulk carrier under ballast Lc = 300 m, TD = 7.4 m, TR = 9.0 m/s, ingoing current 0.8 knots, UTM coordinates (zone 33U).
Applsci 12 07692 g004
Figure 5. Święta fairway bend. Safe maneuvering area of cruise ship passage Lc = 260 m in least favorable hydrometeorological conditions. Wind S and W, 10 m/s, outgoing current 0.7 knots, UTM coordinates (zone 33U).
Figure 5. Święta fairway bend. Safe maneuvering area of cruise ship passage Lc = 260 m in least favorable hydrometeorological conditions. Wind S and W, 10 m/s, outgoing current 0.7 knots, UTM coordinates (zone 33U).
Applsci 12 07692 g005
Table 1. Sections and the parameters of the modernized Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway.
Table 1. Sections and the parameters of the modernized Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway.
Kilometer of
Fairway
Type of SectionRadius
[m]
Width
Max [m]
Width
Min [m]
Depth
Max [m]
Depth
Min [m]
fromto
05.3Port Świnoujście
5.37.6Straight 13013014.012.5
8.19.1Straight 11011012.512.5
9.810.9Bend230012012014.012.5
11.417.0Straight 11011018.012.5
17.423.0Straight 10010012.512.5
23.828.8Straight 25025012.512.5
29.640.9Straight 10010012.512.5
41.243.0Bend220015511012.512.5
43.048.6Straight 11011012.512.5
48.849.5Bend + Turning basin 35015012.512.5
49.551.5Straight 35022014.012.5
52.053.0Bend168015015013.012.5
53.254.4Straight 13013012.512.5
54.755.4Bend173015015012.512.5
55.659.0Straight 10010012.512.5
59.460.5Bend160015015012.512.5
60.862.9Straight 10010012.512.5
63.464.0Turning basin 36036012.512.5
64.366.6Straight 1009012.512.5
66.767.0Straight 13013012.512.5
67.167.4Turning basin 33033012.512.5
Table 2. Determination of safe breadths of passing ships in straight sections of the Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway.
Table 2. Determination of safe breadths of passing ships in straight sections of the Świnoujście–Szczecin fairway.
T1 + T2
[m]
B1 + B2 [m]
Slope Inclination
1:21:31:4
8324047
9313845
10303643
11293441
12283339
13273237
14263135
15253034
16242832
17232730
18222628
19212527
20202325
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gucma, S.; Gucma, M.; Gralak, R.; Przywarty, M. Maximum Safe Parameters of Ships in Complex Systems of Port Waterways. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7692. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157692

AMA Style

Gucma S, Gucma M, Gralak R, Przywarty M. Maximum Safe Parameters of Ships in Complex Systems of Port Waterways. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(15):7692. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157692

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gucma, Stanisław, Maciej Gucma, Rafał Gralak, and Marcin Przywarty. 2022. "Maximum Safe Parameters of Ships in Complex Systems of Port Waterways" Applied Sciences 12, no. 15: 7692. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157692

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop