Next Article in Journal
Hyperparameter Tuning with High Performance Computing Machine Learning for Imbalanced Alzheimer’s Disease Data
Previous Article in Journal
Variation of Nutritional Quality Depending on Harvested Plant Portion of Broccoli and Black Cabbage
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cool Surface Strategies with an Emphasis on the Materials Dimension: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue: Recent Advances in Energy Efficiency of Buildings

by
Montserrat Zamorano
School of Civil Engineering, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(13), 6669; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136669
Submission received: 24 June 2022 / Accepted: 29 June 2022 / Published: 1 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Energy Efficiency of Buildings)

1. Introduction

Buildings are important consumers of energy; in fact, they represent 30–45% of global energy use and one-third of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [1,2] and make an important contribution to the urban heat island effect (UHI). In this context, the correct design and execution of buildings, the adequate use of energy sources, and the development of new materials are necessary to reduce energy demand and operating costs, as well as to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases during the life cycle of buildings.
This special issue collects a set of papers which show important efforts focused to improve the energy-efficient of buildings, in accordance with circular economy policies and their following life cycle phases: (i) the design phase, taking into account climatic parameters and climatic zones; (ii) the construction phase, using new materials for building, which include recycled waste; and (iii) the use phase, reducing energy consumption. These initiatives are summarized below.

2. Design Phase of Building: Analysis of Climate-Oriented Research in Building

Many aspects of the construction and operation of buildings depend on climatic parameters and climatic zones, so they are fundamental for adapting to and mitigating the effects of climate change [3]. In fact, a broad spectrum of themes directly and indirectly related to climate and climatic zones and buildings have shown that 88% of all climate-oriented investigations are within the scope of the general topic of energy conservation [3]. Consequently, a thorough understanding of all climate-dependent aspects will help in designing dwellings appropriately in different climate zones.
In this sense, and in the current context of the climate crisis, it is essential to design buildings that can cope with climate dynamics throughout their life cycle because it will ensure the development of sustainable and resilient building stock. Because of the higher global and surface temperature during the last 100 years, and projections of future climate conditions, it is necessary to determine the setting of new energy budgets and to transform the energy performance of buildings and cities [4,5]. To do that, and given the importance of precision in the assignment of a climatic zone when correctly sizing domestic hot water, heating and cooling systems, and the appropriate selection of the construction materials used, it is essential to take climate dynamism into account in the building design phase [6].
Thus, in the case of the cities of peninsular Spain, the allocation of climatic zones currently included in the Edification Technical Code [7] is not suitable for current and future climatic conditions. In fact, taking into account the climate data recorded in the 2015–2018 period, 80% of cities today have a different climate zone to that of the CTE [6]; moreover, it is expected that by the year 2085 and under the forecasts recorded in the RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios, practically all cities in mainland Spain observe a change in their climate zone to a warmer one [6]. It should be noted that the consequences observed in peninsular Spain can be extrapolated to other areas, so it is possible to conclude that significant climate change will reduce the heating energy demand of dwellings, but increase the demand for cooling. Therefore, architectural and construction standards must adapt to the urban environment’s actual conditions and consider the main scenarios, in order to lead to a building design that mitigates climate change and adapts to it. Hence, it is necessary to develop new climate zones and build recommendations to preserve the correct thermal conditions of future periods [6].

3. Construction Phase of Building: Using New Materials for Building That Include Recycled Waste

The creation of economic and environmentally friendly materials based on the integration of secondary materials as substitutes represents an opportunity to reduce waste disposal and the consumption of natural resources in the building industry.
For example, innovative porous materials (PM) could be synthesized by bottom ash and silica fume (as raw materials) to promote a circular economy, and new solutions could be proposed to improve urban air quality, reducing PM concentrations [8]. Another example is the integration of glass in the fabrication of ceramic materials as fine particles with optimal dosage and particle size, in order to enhance their physical, mechanical, and thermal properties and improve the solar reflectance performance [9]. The design of ceramic tiles with recycled glass could contribute to the production of friendly construction materials to be applied in the design of cool surfaces [10], i.e., surfaces with reflective materials and coatings that reflect the solar energy radiation that hits building envelopes and urban areas [11], including roofs, facades, and pavements. Such materials are able to reduce the thermal infrared radiation outflow in the atmosphere, as well as the temperature and the solar heat gain, in order to palliate the UHI effect [12].

4. Use Phase of Building: Reducing Energy Consumption

Finally, the household sector plays a significant role in energy conservation and environmental sustainability in terms of using energy-saving goods [13], so products that swiftly dissipate energy are considered important in achieving efficiency and reducing carbon emissions [14]. However, energy saving in the residential sector is dependent on users’ technological and habitual behavior; in fact, energy-efficient home appliances (EEHA) offer more energy efficiency and sustainability than the habitual correction of turning off appliances when not in use [15]. In this sense, a significant relationship between environmental concern, environmental knowledge, subjective norms, eco-labeling, and attitude towards buying has been detected. It has been also confirmed that the green self-identity moderates the existent relationship between the attitude and buying intention of energy-efficient home appliances, while environmental knowledge does not [16].

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Marique, A.-F.; Rossi, B. Cradle-to-grave life-cycle assessment within the built environment: Comparison between the refurbishment and the complete reconstruction of an office building in Belgium. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 224, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Pal, S.K.; Takano, A.; Alanne, K.; Siren, K. A life cycle approach to optimizing carbon footprint and costs of a residential building. Build. Environ. 2017, 123, 146–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Verichev, K.; Zamorano, M.; Salzar-Concha, C.; Carpio, M. Analysis of Climate-Oriented Researches in Building. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Troup, L.; Eckelman, M.J.; Fannon, D. Simulating Future Energy Consumption in Office Buildings Using an Ensemble of Morphed Climate Data. Appl. Energy 2019, 255, 113821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bellia, L.; Mazzei, P.; Palombo, A. Weather Data for Building Energy Cost-Benefit Analysis. Int. J. Energy Res. 1998, 22, 1205–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Díaz-López, C.; Jódar, J.; Verichev, K.; Rodriguez, M.L.; Carpio, M.; Zamorano, M. Dynamics of Changes in Climate Zones and Building Energy Demand. A Case Study in Spain. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ministry of Housing. Royal Decree 314/2006 of March 17, Approving the Technical Building Code (Real Decreto 314/2006, de 17 de Marzo, Por El Que Se Aprueba El Código Técnico de La Edificación); Ministry of Housing: Madrid, Spain, 2006.
  8. Cornelio, A.; Zanoletti, A.; Braga, R.; Depero, L.E.; Bontempi, E. The Reuse of Industrial By-Products for the Synthesis of Innovative Porous Materials, with the Aim to Improve Urban Air Quality. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mourou, C.; Zamorano, M.; Rúiz-Padillo, D.P.; Martín-Morales, M. Cool Surface Strategies with an Emphasis on the Materials Dimension: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mourou, C.; Martín-Morales, M.; Zamorano, M.; Rúiz-Padillo, D.P. Light Reflectance Characterization of Waste Glass Coating for Tiles. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pisello, A.L. State of the art on the development of cool coatings for buildings and cities. Sol. Energy 2017, 144, 660–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gao, Y.; Xu, J.; Yang, S.; Tang, X.; Zhou, Q.; Ge, J.; Xu, T.; Levinson, R. Cool roofs in China: Policy review, building simulations, and proof-of-concept experiments. Energy Policy 2014, 74, 190–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ali, S.; Ullah, H.; Akbar, M.; Akhtar, W.; Zahid, H. Determinants of consumer intentions to purchase energy-saving household products in Pakistan. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Tan, C.-S.; Ooi, H.-Y.; Goh, Y.-N. A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior to predict consumers’ purchase intention for energy-efficient household appliances in Malaysia. Energy Policy 2017, 107, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Frederiks, E.R.; Stenner, K.; Hobman, E.V.; Fischle, M. Evaluating energy behavior change programs using randomized controlled trials: Best practice guidelines for policymakers. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2016, 22, 147–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Li, Y.; Siddik, A.B.; Masukujjaman, M.; Wei, X. Bridging Green Gaps: The Buying Intention of Energy Efficient Home Appliances and Moderation of Green SelfIdentity. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zamorano, M. Special Issue: Recent Advances in Energy Efficiency of Buildings. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6669. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136669

AMA Style

Zamorano M. Special Issue: Recent Advances in Energy Efficiency of Buildings. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(13):6669. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136669

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zamorano, Montserrat. 2022. "Special Issue: Recent Advances in Energy Efficiency of Buildings" Applied Sciences 12, no. 13: 6669. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136669

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop