Next Article in Journal
Fractional Condensation of Fast Pyrolysis Bio-Oil to Improve Biocrude Quality towards Alternative Fuels Production
Next Article in Special Issue
Weak Signal Processing Methods Based on Improved HHT and Filtering Techniques for Steel Wire Rope
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Study and Geometric Investigation of the Influence of Rectangular Baffles over the Mixture of Turbulent Flows into Stirred Tanks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Automatic Defect Identification Method for Magnetic Particle Inspection of Bearing Rings Based on Visual Characteristics and High-Level Features
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Research of 30 mm Detecting Distance of Testing Device for Wire Rope Based on Open Magnetizer

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(10), 4829; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12104829
by Mengqi Liu 1, Chi Zhang 1, Xiaoyuan Jiang 1, Yanhua Sun 1,*, Xiaotian Jiang 1, Ran Li 2,3 and Lingsong He 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(10), 4829; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12104829
Submission received: 25 February 2022 / Revised: 29 April 2022 / Accepted: 6 May 2022 / Published: 10 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Digital Non-Destructive Testing Technology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

Please find comments in the attached PDF file as sticky notes.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors used finite element analysis was used to verify if the MFL signal exists at the large lift-off. They combined magnetic sensing and coupling and weak analog signal processing method. My constructive criticisms of the article are itemized below:

  1. How did the authors obtain the material parameters used in the FEM analysis?
  2. Superficial comments about the computational model. It is not clear to me how the authors apply this method.
  3. Regarding the FEM model, the paper does not report any aspect associated with the convergence of the FE model. The convergence is a critical issue, both in terms of the quality of the solution and its ability to go beyond global displacements and quantify internal stress resultants and the corresponding stresses, and in terms of the computational load associated with the analysis.
  4. The experimental setup must be better explained. How many structures are analyzed for each condition? Also, how the authors treat the aliasing and leakage phenomena?
  5. In figures 27, 28, 30, 32 and 34, the authors nee to increase the size of the axes.
  6. The limitations must be discussed by the authors and to the related need of further work.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

After the major revision the manuscript became much more understandable. Thanks for taking into account all the comments. The suggestions for minor corrections you can find in the attached PDF file as sticky notes.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Line 56-66 in red was added to supplement the background and relevant reference of large lift-off MFL method. 

Line 629-632 & 636-641 in red was added to discuss experiments and simulation results in more detail.

5 references have been added.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have satisfactorily addressed all the queries raised by the reviewer.

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 2 comments

Point 1: the introduction can be improved.

Response 1: Line 56-66 in red was added to supplement the background and relevant reference of large lift-off MFL method. 

Point 2: the results presentation can be improved.

Response 2: Line 629-632 & 636-641 in red was added to discuss experiments and simulation results in more detail.

Back to TopTop