Next Article in Journal
Removal of Copper, Nickel, and Zinc Ions from an Aqueous Solution through Electrochemical and Nanofiltration Membrane Processes
Previous Article in Journal
A Practical and Efficient Node Blind SignCryption Scheme for the IoT Device Network
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Fuel Flowrate Control for Aeroengine and Fuel Thermal Management for Airborne System of Aircraft—An Overview

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(1), 279; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010279
by Dong Li 1, Jie Hang 2, Yunhua Li 2,* and Sujun Dong 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(1), 279; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010279
Submission received: 21 November 2021 / Revised: 15 December 2021 / Accepted: 23 December 2021 / Published: 28 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Aerospace Science and Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Fuel Flowrate Control and Thermal Management for Aircraft Aeroengine—an Overview


General:
English needs significant improvement, the manuscript should receive editing by a native speaker including the correction of many misstypes.

The figures show significantly different styling, it would be beneficial to have similar looks, especially if they were all made by the authors. If they are taken from other sources, they should be referenced.

Specifics

L27: Please explain what is "the neck technology of aircraft"?

L59:  "Moreover, the short burst of waste thermal energy generated by directed energy weapon should also be temporarily stored using the thermal capacitance of fuel [16]" is this sentence referring to protection against directed thermal weapons or the use of them? Also, is this the definite way to treat energy weapons heat generation, or is it just one option. I believe this should be discussed in more detail

L70: Please correct repetition "maximum fuel temperature of fuel"

 

Author Response

Dear respected reviewer 1,

Thank you your reviewing my manuscript and your giving valuable suggestions. The revision report see the attached file "reply to reviewer 1".

 

Best regards,

Yunhua Li

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The overall area of work presented by the authors is worthy; however, there are several details that are lacking in this manuscript. These details need to be addressed prior to consideration of the work for publication.

The comments are provided in a separate file. 

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Dear Respected Reviewer 2,

Thank you for your reviewing my mauscript and providing the valuable comments. The revision report see the attached file "Reply to reviewer 2".

 

Best regards,

Yunhua Li

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop