Next Article in Journal
Auction-Based Consensus of Autonomous Vehicles for Multi-Target Dynamic Task Allocation and Path Planning in an Unknown Obstacle Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Mid-Holocene Palaeoenvironment, Plant Resources and Human Interaction in Northeast Iberia: An Archaeobotanical Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

State of the Art Review about Bio-Inspired Design and Applications: An Aerospace Perspective

by
Sejal Budholiya
1,
Aayush Bhat
1,
S. Aravind Raj
1,*,
Mohamed Thariq Hameed Sultan
2,3,4,*,
Ain Umaira Md Shah
1 and
Adi A. Basri
1
1
Department of Manufacturing Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632014, India
2
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
3
Laboratory of Biocomposite Technology, Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products (INTROP), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
4
Aerospace Malaysia Innovation Centre (944751-A), Prime Minister’s Department, MIGHT Partnership Hub, Jalan Impact, Cyberjaya 63000, Malaysia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(11), 5054; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115054
Submission received: 27 April 2021 / Revised: 21 May 2021 / Accepted: 21 May 2021 / Published: 29 May 2021

Abstract

:
The field of bio-inspired design has tremendously transitioned into newer automated methods, yet there are methods being discovered which can elucidate underlying principles in design, materials, and manufacturing. Bio-inspired design aims to translate knowledge from the natural world to the current trends in industry. The recent growth in additive manufacturing (AM)methods has fueled the tremendous growth of bio-inspired products. It has enabled the production of intricate and complicated features notably used in the aerospace industry. Numerous methodologies were adopted to analyse the process of bio-inspired material selection, manufacturing methods, design, and applications. In the current review, different approaches are implemented to utilize bio-inspired designs that have revolutionized the aerospace industry, focusing on AM methods.

1. Introduction

Bio-inspired design is a broad field of study, which emphasizes cognitive mechanisms to facilitate process-based inspiration. The method of utilizing biomimetic inspiration has been investigated since the 1950s by revolutionary thinkers, such as artists, engineers, and innovators. This was implemented in architecture, automotive, and the aerospace sector [1,2,3,4]. The incorporation of mathematics with architecture was used in the earliest construction of complex bio-inspired structures. Using such methods, the varying characteristics that can be adopted from different animals and birds were characterized, the primary focus being the wings of innumerable birds. Tucker and Parrott focused on the structure of birds, measuring the aerodynamic capabilities [2]. These include the gliding performance of the laggar falcon, emphasizing the soaring capabilities and the use of wind tunnels for testing the flight. In 1987, Norberg and Rayner saw potential in the optimal design of the bat wings and their varied applications in both mechanical systems and aerodynamic models [3], taking the aspect ratio and morphology as the primary measures and comparing it with the bat’s specific movements. In later years, with the growth of industrialization and manufacturing techniques, there was a brisk development in rapid manufacturing techniques for bio-inspired design. The concept of biomimicry demands a scientific and engineering based approach, rather than to just be implemented in the form of a concept [5]. The application of bio-inspired concepts in the aerospace sector implements different inspired features, such as morphing and flapping methodologies [6]. The conceptual process flow for a bioinspired design follows the biomimicry methodology [7]. The initial steps focus on extensive research and laying the groundwork for existing biological systems and methods. These were further extended to specific areas where bio-inspired design was targeted and the methodologies it can follow for further scope. The entire framework was based on the process, structure, property, behaviour, which can further be elaborated for AM. These were expanded into the design spaces for the method of design of additive manufacturing (DFAM) [8]. One of the key examples was the wings of a beetle. It was chosen due to its large wingspan. After the study and research, experimentation is conducted to replicate this using a scotch yoke mechanism. This was used in drones and aerofoil structures. Subsequently, DFAM methods such as FEA (finite element analysis) and initial CAD (computer aided design) design were applied for manufacturing. The further scope for research emphasizes bio-inspired materials, which was combined with the plan for the optimization of parts [9,10]. The benchmark of design has evolved to a bio-inspired strategy to create artificial solutions with natural capability [11,12,13,14,15,16]. Systematic design literature and its methods have developed over the years, being much more relevant in today’s world due to the approach of finding ecologically sustainable solutions. Figure 1 shows the different methods to implement the bio-inspired design, involving a top-down or bottom-up approach. The bio-inspired method [11] identified the unmet needs and translated these into the feasibility of an application. The bio-inspired method [15] used the biological functions to enable iterative solutions used to extract the neutral solutions, the combination of biology and mechanics followed by constraints. The Aalborg Method emphasized integrating the bionic design process that selected the natural system and evaluated the environmental factors [17]. The spiral design method [18] led to the development of a design brief that focused on the human need, with natural modes, and explored inventive principles to build ideas. The problem method analysed the micro to macro levels, to reframe the solution with parallels between the systems and components.
The replacement of conventional materials in aerospace with bio-inspired materials, techniques, and methods can damage tolerance, strength, and durability. The applications vary from specific rudder parts to aerofoil designs in aeronautical parts. Figure 2 shows the methodology adopted to review the bio-inspired design.

2. Review on Materials Used in Bio-Inspired Design

Bio-inspired materials mimic natural materials in terms of properties or functions, these are made of synthetic materials. Bio-inspired materials are a combination between biology and physical sciences. The combination of the various bio-inspired materials provides templates for performance enhancement. Hair-like structures consisted of a network of microfibrils, protruding from a surface. This inspired various devices, such as sensors, adhesion, and geometrical capturing arrangements [10]. Deep-sea glass sponges are capable of producing complex skeletal structures which were reconstructed using the laser additive manufacturing (LAM) technique. These reconstructed biomimetic structures displayed high buckling resistance for a particular material [14]. Nacre and other hybrids consisted of multiscale architecture which displayed high strength, high stiffness, and high toughness. These serve as great alternatives to synthetic materials, that improved structural integrity and provided ease of robust assembly [20]. In nature, the silk from the spider’s web has the most common occurrence. These structures were made of microfibrils and the micro/nanostructures consisted of spindle knotted fibers. The interlinking of these amorphous chains were the domains of the supramolecular structure. The development of artificial biomaterials displayed water-controlling properties and impeccable strength [21]. One of the earliest bio-inspired structures was inspired by turtle shells which consisted of Ca, P, Cl, and Na, etc. These multilayer structures consisted of porous structures which were used in composite damping material. Moreover, the inspiration for composite structures that we see today was drawn from these porous shells [22]. Bone-inspired microstructures include bone regeneration to provide cell attachment and ingrowth. These materials were designed using a bottom-up approach and a hierarchical atomic structure [23]. Bio-inspired materials display impeccable material properties, such as self-repair, crack deflection, strengthening mechanisms, toughness, and lightweight structures [24]. These are used in aerospace, automotive, energy, architecture, agriculture, robotics, transportation, and healthcare.
Table 1 shows the bio-inspired materials, cellular structures, properties, and microstructures.
Burns et al. highlighted the tree trunk’s internal structure [25]. It closely resembled a ball-socket joint structure arranged in a lay-up structure consisting of fibrils. In conclusion, the utilization of bio-inspired materials in composite and epoxy layers demonstrate properties, such as improved ductility and damage tolerance. Figure 3 shows the analysis of the T joint performance with respect to the buckling load to study the displacement for bio-inspired tree trunk material.
Honeycomb structures reduce the material density and honeycomb structures optimize the space to reduce deflection. Figure 4 displays the cellular structure of honeycomb, ladybug, and beetle which progressively show high strength properties [26].
The AM technique was employed in the materials; for bio-inspired design, the infill techniques in AM used ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene) it was used to vary the geometry. It offered the freedom to expand the various materials in specific designs [27]. The beetle structure with tubular showed the maximum strength performance, due to even weight distribution. Hogan et al. further emphasized the use of AM techniques to produce bio-inspired materials [28]. Figure 5 shows the methods for additively manufacturing bio-inspired materials and their subsequent properties.
The material properties inherit the design principles rather than duplicating the material design [23]. The honeycomb structures were printed using fused deposition modelling (FDM) that involved a layer-by-layer deposition of the ABS or any other required polymer to produce structures that were damage-tolerant with high fracture toughness. The complex geometry of nacre and deep-sea glass sponges were printed using Digital Light Processing (DLP) which ensured high stiffness and strength [28]. Skin structures are often one of the key inspirations in bio-inspired materials. Graphene manufactured with the chemical vapour deposition process displayed high compression strength [29]. The combination of cobalt naphthenate, ethyl ketone peroxide, and unsaturated polyester resins (UPR) were used to make fire retardant materials [30]. The braided epoxy composites were printed using AM techniques. The coolant material design in spacecraft was inspired by the earthworm that consisted of a film layer and porous surface [31]. This resulted in the most revolutionary features of bio-inspired materials that focus on properties, which has led to diverse applications in the aerospace, automotive, healthcare, defense, and architecture sector.
There are various methods of material selection as depicted in Figure 6 based on choosing a technique, artificial intelligence method, screening method, optimization, and fuzzy methods. The screening methods work based on an elimination method and the identification of multiple approaches for a particular problem. This involved the use of Ashby plots and considering the economic factors of materials. The materials were compared using ranking methods based on a multi-criteria decision-making process. The various processes followed a hierarchical approach to classify materials. The Artificial Selection methods used digital techniques for material selection, that rely on databases as compared to human experience, tools, and manuals. An extensive and optimized approach for material selection involved the use of programming tools to identify materials based on required parameters. Various strategies were analyzed with strengths and weaknesses for each specific material property. Life cycle energy analysis was used to identify materials with the least energy consumption. The use of fuzzy logic was to integrate specific assessment properties devoid of numerical rankings and the materials across various environments [32].
The various methods in Figure 6 used computing and strategic methods, which focused on mathematical calculations that chose methods based on performance indices. The methodology of material selection consisted of tools, strategies, and identification of limitations.
Table 2 gives a summary of the material properties, highlighting the contributions and inferences.

3. Review on Manufacturing Methods Used in Bio-Inspired Design

Greek architecture is the key inspiration for the earliest bio-inspired manufacturing methods Historically, accounts were seen in the Bolle di saponetraArte e Mathematica that described the geometry of a soap bubble. On a theoretical basis, it expanded from mathematics to architecture [1,2,3,4]. The distinction was made after identifying characteristics and noting the earliest ones being drawn from mathematics. Plateau described the energy distribution, and it was the onset for manufacturing bio-inspired design. The conventional manufacturing techniques lay the early onset for minimal surface production. [1,2,3,4].
The Topology optimization (TO) method was used across various industries, which followed the density-based approach. It used the DFAM aspect which resulted in more specific solutions to print bio-inspired structures which have a complex geometry [13]. Frascio et al. focussed on the adhesive-bonded specimens in a thermal cycle using 3D printing techniques [34]. The main advantage of AM techniques was the out-of-the-plane compressive response of panels, with bio fabrication. The inability of conventional manufacturing methods to produce complex geometries, limited applications, waste-production, and limited design structures led to the adoption a new manufacturing method [35]. Due to the complexity in nature, post-processing techniques were applied after powder-based processes [35]. The utilization of the selective laser sintering (SLS) method and its combination with six-design methods were used [36]. Aziz et al.broadly classified the different manufacturing processes of structures as depicted in Figure 7 [37]. This highlighted a hierarchical approach to manufacture bio-inspired structures, with eventual growth from the organism level to the ecosystem level.
Furthermore, the material structures were converted into the mason-slurry composition, which, incorporated by carbon nano tubes (CNT), amplified the reinforcing effects. The material layers and the hierarchical structure were proven successful in various applications, especially in aerospace [38]. These paved the way for the bio-inspired composites, which provide a near-net-shape for bio-inspired materials, which displayed anisotropic properties. It provided integration between AM and the techniques [39]. With the incorporation of 4D printing, there was an onset of shape memory transformations. In addition to 3D printed materials, it responded to environmental stimuli such as pressure, temperature, etc. [33]. The main advantage of AM was the key focus on sustainable development and production of high impact complex parts with material reduction. Product life cycle management was used for an all-encompassing bio-inspired method, from the physical characteristics to the design method. DFAM, sustainability, and bio-inspired design encompass the bio-inspired product [40]. SLS with a nylon powder and adhesive bonding was the technique used for this application. HoganVelsco et al. gave a detailed explanation and the characteristics of each AM technique, as shown in Figure 8 [28].
The structural–material properties were enhanced by the AM techniques, which were optimized for bio-inspired design, using generative design, topology optimization, and lattice structure design, as shown in Figure 9.
The constraints were further considered during manufacturing. The ideation to the design phase was solely dependent on experimentation [41]. This provided a synergistic system for bio-inspired applications. The research in bio-inspired design is inclined towards sustainable development, and this research methodology was implemented in the laser-based systems shown in Figure 10 [42].
The majority of the optimum ways of manufacturing bio-inspired design is multi-layered architecture [43]. They have higher energy absorption and hit capacity, which was increased by subsequent adhesion. Alternatively, fire-resistant properties were also noted using AM techniques. The GAP methodology establishes it for the design and manufacturing process. An extensive GAP method is shown in Figure 11, which implemented a product development cycle for bio-inspired processes.
CNC’s infusion (cellulose nanocrystal) to print a composite structure [45]. The infill in ABS and the impregnation of CNC even at 100% infill opened new avenues for AM techniques. The bio-inspired design also inspired new frontiers in AM, including the gravo-elastic scaling using bio-inspiration [46]. The method emphasized the gravitational and aeroelastic scaling, it aimed at aeroelastic, centrifugal, and gravitational load acting on the load. The scaling-up process was followed by a ground testing method, with the blade structural scaling error. Along with the AM methods, optimization techniques such as TO, generative design, and shape optimization can be used [47]. Selective laser melting (SLM) techniques were used for the Ti-6Al-4 V fabrication. The compression testing was more efficient than conventional methods; it had strength beyond 300 MPa. Similarly, Sun et al. highlighted the mechanical properties of a bio-inspired tool path [48]. The parallel scan method was used for contour crafting, which involved printing honeycomb and nacre structures and assisted by FEA analysis. The growth in composite materials has increased in the past decade, which serves as an optimum technique for printing bio-inspired materials [44]. Toughness and strength were increased to 12% and 100%. The two main methods followed are given in Figure 12.
The SLM techniques provide 10% more accuracy in designing corrugated, triangular, and square panels. Similarly, corrugated sandwiches with foam-related substances and metals with conventional structures sustained more shock and loading absorption [49]. One of the key features to be noted is the performance trade-offs for 3D printed designs, as shown in Figure 13. These represent the basic building blocks of bio-inspired materials, varying from brick mortar, concentric hexagon, cross lamellar, and rotating plywood [50].
In recent years, in combination with FEM techniques, the corrugated structures can aid homogenization [51]. The continuous growth of 3D printing from the nanoscale to the macroscale was aided by various structure formations shown in Figure 14 [52].
The CNC wire cut machine was used to impose manufacturing constraints in foam materials for groid fabrication. It highlighted the importance of using conventional manufacturing techniques combined with digital manufacturing [53]. Freeze casting methods were employed to manufacture bio-inspired structures that ensured the lamellar microstructures between ice structures that improved strength and complexities [23]. The beam-based dynamic model was proposed and could accurately transmit the waves and identify the multiparameter efforts. Furthermore, the thin-walled metal tubes provide superior mechanical properties, and these were the horse hoof inspired compared to vertex structure tubes [54]. The AM techniques utilized lattice structures with different process parameters, producing dense lattice structures, which provided successive transfer of load [55]. Conclusively, AM processes, in their futuristic approach, moved towards sandwich composites with re-entrant cores [56]. It ensured the balance between fatigue strength and loading. There is still scope for improvement due to crack development and fatigue failure. The compressive properties developed in both room and elevated temperatures [57]. The primary shortcomings noted were matrix softening and interfacial debonding. The presence of helicoidal structures reduced these failures. It is further enhanced by impact performance [58]. However, one of the critical concerns is the manufacturing defects due to the 3D printing techniques.
Bio-machining is a manufacturing technique that utilizes microorganisms to remove metal from the workpiece. The main advantages are the less utilization of energy and reduced thermal damage. It is a sustainable technique for machining micro components. These micro components are used in aerospace electronics and other technologies. The overall dimensions of the compact parts are around 100 µm. There are various kinds of machining processes which include physical, chemical, and biological. Bio machining is a controlled biological process that uses selective microorganisms to remove metals. It is a consecutive oxidation and reduction reaction, with an extracellular polymeric substance. Bio machining performed on a copper workpiece involved the conversion of Fe2+ to Fe3+. Subsequently, the ferric ion acts as an oxidising agent, and Fe2+ was reduced by the microorganisms. This was a cyclic process inclusive of subsequent reduction and oxidation [59]. Tena et al. studied the machining of copper. The oxygen-free copper (OFC) consisted of a 10 × 15 × 2 mm disk rinsed with deionized water. The tests consisted of the OFC block in a culture medium, it was placed in a deionized sample and taken out in intervals. Extremophile bacteria was used in bio machining, and the efficiency was increased with the increase in the inoculum. This shows the potential to be implemented at an industrial level [60].
Slip casting was a technique used to manufacture bio-inspired materials and structures. The process consisted of the deposition of fluids into a mould. These were pre-dimensioned moulds, where the fluid is deposited and vacuumed after the wetting. The continuous assembly was used to prepare the bio-inspired structures. This technique when combined with AM can potentially be implemented for complex, nacre-based bio-inspired structures and tubular honeycomb structures [61]. The various manufacturing techniques with a focus on AM are highlighted and used to manufacture bio-inspired structures.

4. Applications of Bio-Inspiration in the Aerospace Industry

(a)
Wing designs
A design based on seagulls’ capability to morph their wings to provide reasonable aerodynamic and flapping control was mimicked [62]. The gulls’ variable wing action was implemented in an aircraft design using lightweight airframe components and an actuator. This control linkage-based system helped change the wing’s morphology. Figure 15 depicts the morphing wing structure in an aircraft. The experimental and analytical analysis results were found to agree with each other, thus proving the bio-inspired concept.
An implementation of a flapping wing mechanism attached rearwards to a fixed-wing in micro-air vehicles (MAVs) was studied in early 2005 [63]. Although the main, fixed element was found to provide most of the lift, the bio-inspired flappingwing provided more thrust and helped prevent flow separation for the main feature itself, thus improving the complete system’s efficiency.
A bird’s wing’s three-dimensional flapping motion was implemented in a MAV design using a four-bar mechanism [64]. The motive behind implementing such a plan was to replicate the spatial flapping of wings to provide a similar aerodynamic advantage. The spherical mechanism was used for flapping, which when compared with a non-spherical mechanism, provided a favorable flapping mechanism for flight applications.
A humpback whale boasts a superior hydrodynamic performance by the tubercles on the leading edge of its flippers [64]. An inspired tubercle design on an aircraft’s wing was developed to improve aerodynamic performance by increasing maximum lift and drag reduction. This could thus help reduce weight and fuel costs. Figure 16 depicts the implemented tubercle design on the wings and stabilizers of an aircraft.
Leonardo da Vinci’s plane design and inspired bird wing design to mimic the swift and effortless wing action of birds that enabled flight was discussed [65]. The designs were based on the anatomy of birds, which made them capable of flight.
A design inspired by a bird’s wing’s ability to change shape seamlessly, as indicated in Figure 17, depending on the flight itself was adopted to help provide enhanced performance [66]. A flexing parallelogram wing in place of a fixed, non-morphed wing element enabled an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to reach its higher maximum velocity with a decrease in power requirement.
The impact that the shape of an insect’s flapping wing has on its aerodynamic performance was analyzed [67]. When comparing the profiles of wings with equal wingspans, the bumblebee and honeybee were noted to possess ideal wing shapes. In contrast, on comparing wing conditions with a similar wing surface, it was observed that the bumblebee and the fruit fly had optimum wing shapes. Based on the shapes and other characteristics of an insect’s wing, these data could be implemented successfully in larger aerodynamic applications to improve forward flight.
An elastically deforming wing design was explored as flexibility and capability of the wing to deform play an essential role in improving the system’s efficiency [68]. Figure 18 depicts the flapping-wing design. Wing deformations are commonly observed in insects such as dragonflies, locusts, and honeybees, with wing deformations being necessary to maintain lift. A similar synthetic, flexible wing design made of carbon fiber, Kapton, and Mylar films was analyzed. The analysis revealed that the artificial wing’s elastic deformations matched closely with that of an insect, thus proving the concept of the design.
A study for flight in the Martian atmosphere was numerically analysed [69]. To offset the low density of such an atmosphere that directly impacts the aerodynamic performance and restricts commonly used space-flight techniques, a flapping wing, and a hovering mechanism was devised and studied numerically using the Navier–Stokes equation. It was predicted that a bumblebee’s wing shape wouldn’t sustain flight in the Martian atmosphere. However, an enlargement of the wing coupled with a flapping-based wing movement could help generate lift to counteract the increased weight on Mars.
A flapping wing MAV’s noise control capabilities were improved by incorporating a wing design, commonly observed in insects such as bats and butterflies [70]. Dielectric elastomers and other similar materials were used as wings in MAV designs, namely an insect-inspired wing as a reference design, a moth-inspired fabric-based wing design, and an elastic wing design inspired by bats. It was found that the noise per unit thrust decreased with increasing flapping frequency for all the systems and that the rubber flaps provided a better noise reduction than the films.
A leading-edge alula inspired device (LEAD), influenced by a set of feathers on each wing of a bird, called the alula (refer Figure 19) was developed and verified for aerodynamic performance [71,72,73]. The LEAD provided optimal performance when placed along the wing’s semi-span, increasing lift during post and deep stalling.
An investigation to improve the aerodynamic performance inspired by a pigeon’s discrete wing structure. A continuous wing orientation revealed a better drag reduction with more increased lateral stability than a constant wing structure. This indicated the efficiency in the aerodynamic performance of a discrete wing design [72]. Figure 20 depicts the models developed for testing the discrete and continuous structures.
A corrugated wing designed based on a dragonfly was implemented on panels and verified experimentally, with results indicating an improvement in flow characteristics, with more considerable pressure differences between the upper and lower corrugated surfaces, causing an increase in a lift [73]. Another application of a flapping wing mechanism in a UAV to counter turbulence during the flight was approached [74]. During turbulent flights, birds tend to hover rather than flap their wings, which allow a set of covert feathers beside the primary feathers to deflect gusts of turbulent winds. Figure 21 indicates the natural and synthetic mechanisms for the same. The application of a gust mitigation system (GMS) in flapping wing UAVs served a purpose similar to the covert feathers, helping mitigate gusts of winds only while facing turbulence, and remained integrated with the entire wing at all other times to maintain the wing profile.
A Bat’s wing possesses a very articulated musculoskeletal system, which assists them with multiple degrees of freedom, in addition to a compact and lightweight mechanism [75,76]. Mimicking this behaviour, Figure 22 depicts an arm wing structure that was modelled and analysed. The design showed successful wing performance during the flapping motion.
  • (b) Sensors
The implementation of sensors in aerospace engineering plays a crucial role in determining an aerial vehicle’s response towards its surrounding stimuli. An early application of bio-inspired sensors can be traced back to 2003. The problems regarding the installation of environment perception sensors on small-scale aerial vehicles like MAVs and UAVs were the issue [6]. Small winged insects have particular neurons for the same purpose called elementary motion detectors, which helps them form a safe path through lit obstacles. Two micro-bots were mounted by optic flow sensors, to implement optical motion detection. Experiments revealed that this enabled one of the microbots to perceive a safe distance from the ground even after altering speeds and enabled the other to fixate itself on a contrasting target. The functioning of the International Space Station and the crew aboard can be in imminent danger in the event of a leak in the station’s walls [77]. To counter this, various pressure sensors inspired by the sensory capabilities of a swarm of bees are distributed throughout the station to pick up signals in case of a pressure loss. In the event of a pressure loss, a swarm of pressure sensors around the region of failure is activated. An ultralight indoor aerial vehicle, inspired by flies’ flight, was capable of autonomously steering the aircraft [78]. A fly’s ability of trajectory control was incorporated into the system of the plane as well.
Another study based on a bio-inspired optic flow sensor-enabled a MAV to perform tasks such as take-off and leveling mid-flight [7]. Optic flow sensors were tested on serial vehicles for perception sensing of indoor and outdoor environments to assess their sensitivity to illumination [10]. The study proved the sensors to show sound visual processing under natural conditions. A low-cost optical sensor based on the compound eye of a fly was developed, which helped gauge the angular position of a distant edge with a minimum accuracy of 160 times, concerning the particular interceptor angle [79]. A bio-inspired optical device was developed based on a fly’s ability to gauge speed, landing, and obstacles based on elementary motion detection [80]. A sensor similar to the compound eye was developed to mimic the large field of view and the exceptional ability of the insect to process light. This helped with terrain navigation and auto landing, with a 360-degree FOV. Figure 23 indicates the sensor developed inspired by a compound eye of a fly.
A VODKA sensor was also implemented to locate a contrasting target, precisely an edge [81]. This optical sensor (refer Figure 24), inspired by insects’ rapid eye movements such as a housefly was mounted onto a MAV and detected an opposite edge at an exceptional resolution.
A bio-inspired pressure sensor installed chordwise on an unmanned aerial system was used to control the aircraft attitude using a trained artificial neural network [82]. A pressure sensor inspired by mechanoreceptors embedded in a bird’s wing was implemented in a MAV to establish roll control in a turbulent environment by showing the correlation between the pressure variation on the wing surface and pitch angle variation of the upstream flow [83]. A bat possesses several sensory hairs on its wings. Influenced by these structures, a UAV was set up with strain sensors that controlled roll motions, and pressure sensors (chordwise) were able to control pitch motions [84]. A bio-inspired pressure sensor’s robustness to detect airflow installed strategically on the leading edge of a small UAV wing was indicated by numerical analysis. It showed promising results under the change in external stimulus [85].
A quadcopter design inspired from the lobula giant movement detector neurons (LGMD) in locusts was designed to detect possible collisions [86]. A neural network based on LGMD was designed, modelled, and experimentally analysed, with results indicating reliability in terms of collision avoidance. A sensor to detect appropriate landing sites, considering the movements of landmasses on a planetary structure, was developed by NASA [87]. The optical sensor worked on the compound vision principle and could be used for remotely measuring the displacements. Implementing a 2D optic flow sensor based on the compound vision of flying insects in an autonomous MAV indicated that the sensor could track objects successfully at a maximum frame rate of 120fps [88]. Multiple sensors were efficiently assembled within the synthetic compound eye and also had low power consumption. Birds’ ability to use atmospheric conditions to benefit their flight was exploited in a design based on harvesting energy under different wind conditions [89]. The experimental analysis revealed that harvesting energy using various pressure sensors and other components enabled the aircraft to maintain altitude. Another implementation of pressure and strain sensors using a trained artificial neural network helped detect unsteady flow and stall [90].
  • (c) Structures
The influence of biomimetics in the aerospace industry has led to the development and implementation of several bionic structures in advanced, high-end applications. There have been significant developments of bionic systems, other than the standard honeycomb and Kagome structures. Apart from applying a dragonfly-inspired wing in MAVs, dragonflies also possess a very optimized body structure and could ensure lightweight aerospace body parts. Their self-cleansing wings provide constant dirt removal that helps maintain stability [91]. The segmented body of a honeybee was used to influence an aircraft’s nose cone [92]. A segmented nose structure helped the vehicle with enhanced manoeuvrability due to improved bending properties and the aircraft’s axial scalability. The structure of the skin of an aerospace vehicle is of great prominence as a thermal protection layer. A bio-inspired quadrilateral shape structure (BIQS) was tested on a similar setup for its ability to reduce the vibrations due to impact with debris post-capture [93]. Figure 25 depicts the complete structure, including the BIQS, for an in-orbit capture. It was found that the BIS provided a better vibrational damping performance in comparison with a spring-mass damper.
A lightweight, thermal resistant corrugated core sandwich structure inspired from a peacock mantis shrimp was preferred over a honeycomb structure owing to its lower weight, lower heating rate, and minimum deflection at high heating [94]. The heat flow (via transpiration) from the combustion chamber for a hypersonic vehicle was biologically mimicked. A parallelogram-style non-smooth structure was used which improved the cooling rate, like the skin of a tapeworm [31]. A rover to tackle the harsh conditions offered by Mars, which can lead to increased travel time, was theoretically designed at NASA [95]. The design idea involved a giant spherical robot equipped with several separate wind-driven micro flying rovers that would be detached from the spherical bot, just like the seeds of a dandelion, as observed in Figure 26.
A wheel design inspired by an African ostrich’s feet was developed based on its ability to travel on the sand, owing to its unique toe structure [96]. The wheel design could be an effective means of traveling on Mars, with its capability of reducing soil resistance. Considering the debris present in space at the moment, the ISS and other satellites could be in danger of being struck at any moment. A bio-inspired anti-impact manipulator (BAM), based on kangaroos’ spring-like movements, was developed and tested for in-orbit capture of this debris [97]. The spring-like motion of the bio-inspired structure helped reduce the impact velocity of the incoming waste. The scales embedded on the skin of a teleost fish provide stiffening and stabilizing mechanisms for protection and robustness [98]. The scales provide strain stiffening, which promotes the development of morphing structures for aerospace vehicles.

5. Conclusions

This review emphasizes bio-inspired design with its influence on materials, manufacturing methods, and aerospace applications. It highlights the properties such as strength, durability, and manufacturability. The approach aims at identifying upcoming materials such as Ti-6Al 4V which use SLM techniques and can potentially be utilized in gathering space debris. The methodology used in bio-inspired structures and surfaces can be manufactured using AM techniques, with its underlying focus on UAV and MAV designs based on bio-inspired systems, which have not been thoroughly exploited. The characteristics of various material properties, such as toughness, flexibility, and self-repair, displayed in silk, turtle shell, and hair can be employed for aerospace technologies pertaining to contour crafting. Bio-inspired materials could potentially aid 3D printing structures in space. The key to future aerospace technologies’ growth lies in sustainability, which can be achieved by AM techniques and bio-inspired tools. The multiple design processes that can be utilized for conversion into products range from the Aalborg method to the GAP methodology.
MAV and UAV design is interpreted from flapping-wing mechanisms of birds and other winged insects and the presence of specific features of a bird’s wings that aerodynamic aid flight has been explored. The possibility of developing a wing design based on the natural tendency of winged animals to take flight and adjust naturally to conditions that can alter the natural flight conditions has aided the development of similar aerial vehicles that have helped develop optimized designs. Coupling the newly developed techniques with lightweight materials, such as titanium alloys (Ti-6Al-4V), aluminium alloys, and bio-inspired composites, and simultaneous additive implementation manufacturing can genuinely help create lightweight structures that can further help improve flight. The sensors which guide the aerial vehicle have been developed based on bio-inspired phenomena as discussed. The ability of sensors to perform in harsher conditions of space and other planetary environments still has further research scope. The implementation of lightweight structures and AM to supportfabrication for space exploration can be further explored. The development of bio-inspired facilities in the aerospace industry can aid weight reduction without a compromise in reliability, as is already observed in the performance of efficient biological structures. The aerospace industry could be massively benefited provided the said design structures and sensing capabilities are applied on a much larger scale and to much larger systems.

Author Contributions

Original draft preparation, S.B. and A.B.; investigation and supervision, S.A.R.; funding acquisition, M.T.H.S., A.U.M.S., and A.A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Universiti Putra Malaysia, grant number GPB 9668200 and Ministry of Education Malaysia, grant number FRGS/1/2019/STG07/UPM/02/2. The APC was funded by Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Universiti Putra Malaysia for the financial support through the Geran Putra Berimpak (GPB9668200) and Ministry of Education Malaysia, grant number FRGS/1/2019/STG07/UPM/02/2. The authors would also like to thank the Department of Aerospace Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia and Laboratory of Biocomposite Technology, Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Product (INTROP), Universiti Putra Malaysia (HICOE) for the close collaboration in this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Maxwell, J.C. Statique expérimentale et théorique des Liquides soumis aux seules Forces moléculaires. Nature 1874, 10, 119–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Tucker, V.A.; Parrott, C.G. Aerodynamics of gliding flight in a falcon and other birds. J. Exp. Biol. 1970, 52, 2345–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Norberg, U.M.; Rayner, J.M. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Biol. Sci. 1987, 316, 335–427. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gerdes, P. Variazioni sui disegni Lunda. In Matematica e Cultura; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2002; pp. 135–146. [Google Scholar]
  5. Harkness, J.M. In Appreciation A Lifetime of Connections: Otto Herbert Schmitt, 1913–1998. Phys. Perspect. 2002, 4, 456–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ruffier, F.; Viollet, S.; Franceschini, N. OSCAR and OCTAVE: Two bioinspired visually guided aerial microrobots. In Proceedings of the IEEE 11th International Conference on Advanced Robotics(ICAR), Coimbra, Portugal, 30 June–3 July 2003; pp. 726–732. [Google Scholar]
  7. Franceschini, N.; Ruffier, F.; Serres, J. A bio-inspired flying robot sheds light on insect piloting abilities. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Rosen, D.W. Design for Additive Manufacturing: A Method to Explore Unexplored Regions of the Design Space. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, USA, 2007; Available online: https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/80208/2007-34-Rosen.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y (accessed on 28 May 2021).
  9. McDonald, M.; Agrawal, S.K. Design of a bio-inspired spherical four-bar mechanism for flapping-wing micro air-vehicle applications. J. Mech. Robot. 2010, 2, 021012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, F.; Liu, W.; Stefanini, C.; Fu, X.; Dario, P. A novel bioinspired PVDF micro/nano hair receptor for a robot sensing system. Sensors 2010, 10, 94–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Viollet, S.; Ruffier, F.; Ray, T.; Menouni, M.; Aubépart, F.; Kerhuel, L.; Franceschini, N. Characteristics of three miniature bioinspired optic flow sensors in natural environments. In Proceedings of the 2010 Fourth International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications, Venice, Italy, 18–25 July 2010; pp. 51–55. [Google Scholar]
  12. Nguyen, Q.V.; Park, H.C.; Goo, N.S.; Byun, D. Characteristics of abeetle’s free flight and aflapping-wing system that mimics beetleflight. J. Bionic Eng. 2010, 7, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Coelho, D.A.; Versos, C.A.M. An approach to validation of technological industrial design concepts with a bionic character. In Proceedings of the International Conferenceon Designand Product Development(ICDPD’10), Athens, Greece, 29–31 December 2010; pp. 29–31. [Google Scholar]
  14. Emmelmann, C.; Sander, P.; Kranz, J.; Wycisk, E. Laser Additive Manufacturing and Bionics: Redefining Lightweight Design. Phys. Procedia 2011, 12, 364–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Liu, K.; Jiang, L. Bio-inspired design of multiscale structures for function integration. Nano Today 2011, 6, 155–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Glier, M.W.; Tsenn, J.; Linsey, S.J.; McAdams, A.D. Methods for supporting bioinspired design. In Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Denver, CO, USA, 11–17 November 2011; pp. 737–744. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wrigley, C.; Bucolo, S. Teaching Design Led Innovation: The future of industrial design. Des. Princ. Pract. 2011, 5, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Trotta, M.G. Bio-inspired Design Methodology. Int. J. Inf. Sci. 2011, 1, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Versos, C.A. Biologically inspired design: Methods and validation. In Industrial Design-New Frontiers; Coelho, D.A., Ed.; University of Beira Interior: Covilhã, Portugal, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  20. Xu, L.P.; Peng, J.; Liu, Y.; Wen, Y.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, L.; Wang, S. Nacre inspired design of mechanical stable coating with under water superoleophobicity. Acs Nano. 2013, 7, 5077–5083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lin, S.; Ryu, S.; Tokareva, O.; Gronau, G.; Jacobsen, M.M.; Huang, W.; Rizzo, D.J. Predictive modelling-based design and experiments for synthesis and spinning of bioinspired silk fibres. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Connors, M.; Yang, T.; Hosny, A.; Deng, Z.; Yazdandoost, F.; Massaadi, H.; Eernisse, D.; Mirzaeifar, R.; Dean, M.N.; Weaver, J.C.; et al. Bioinspired design of flexible armor based on chiton scales. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Zhang, B.; Han, Q.; Zhang, J.; Han, Z.; Niu, S.; Ren, L. Advancedbio-inspired structural materials: Local properties determine overall performance. Mater. Today 2020, 41, 177–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gu, G.X.; Su, I.; Sharma, S.; Voros, J.L.; Qin, Z.; Buehler, M.J. Three-Dimensional-Printing of Bio-Inspired Composites. J. Biomech. Eng. 2016, 138, 021006–02100616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Burns, L.; Mouritz, A.; Pook, D.; Feih, S. Bio-inspired design of aerospace composite joints for improved damage tolerance. Compos. Struct. 2012, 94, 995–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xiang, J.; Du, J. Energy absorption characteristics of bio-inspired honeycomb structure under axial impact loading. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2017, 696, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Feng, X.; Yang, Z.; Rostom, S.S.; Dadmun, M.; Wang, S.; Wang, Q.; Xie, Y. Reinforcing 3D printed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene by impregnation of methacrylate resin and cellulose nanocrystal mixture: Structural effects and homogeneous properties. Mater. Des. 2018, 138, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hogan, A.V.; Xu, J.; Meyers, M.A. Additive manufacturing as a method to design and optimize bioinspired structures. Adv. Mater. 2018, 52, 1800940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, B.; Tan, H.; Anastasova, S.; Power, M.; Florent, S.; Guang-Zhong, Y. Abio-inspired3Dmicro-structureforgraphene-basedbacteriasensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 123, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, L.; Xu, Y.; Xu, M.; He, Y.; Li, S.; Li, B. An efficient synergistic system for simultaneously enhancing the fire retardancy, moisture resistance and electrical insulation performance of unsaturated polyester resins. Mater. Des. 2020, 187, 108302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, G.; Zhu, Y.; Liao, Z.-Y.; Huang, Z.; Jiang, P.-X. Transpiration cooling with bio-inspired structured surfaces. Bioinspiration Biomim. 2020, 15, 036016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rahim, A.A.; Musa, S.N.; Ramesh, S.; Lim, M.K. A systematic review on material selection methods. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L: J. Mater. Des. Appl. 2020, 234, 1032–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Y.; Li, M.; Lu, W.; Gu, Y.; Wang, S.; Sun, R.; Zhang, X.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Z. Bio-inspired design and fabrication of an ultralight and strong nano-carbon gradient composite. Mater. Des. 2016, 107, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Arenas, J.M.; Alia, C.; Blaya, F.; Sanz, A. Multi-criteria selection of structural adhesives to bond ABS parts obtained by rapid prototyping. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2012, 33, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Fratzl, P.; Dunlop, J.W.C.; Weinkamer, R. Materials Design Inspired by Nature: Function through Inner Architecture; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  36. LuQuan, R.; XiuJuan, L. Functional characteristics of dragonfly wings and its bionic investigation progress. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2013, 56, 884–897. [Google Scholar]
  37. Aziz, M.S.; ElSherif, A.Y. Biomimicryasanapproachforbio-inspired structure with the aid of computation. Alex. Eng. J. 2016, 55, 707–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Yang, S.; Zhao, Y.F. Additive manufacturing-enabled design theory and methodology: A critical review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2015, 80, 327–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yue, H.; Yao, L.; Gao, X.; Zhang, S.; Guo, E.; Zhang, H.; Lin, X.; Wang, B. Effectofball-milling and graphene contents on the mechanical properties and fracture mechanisms of graphene nano sheets reinforced copper matrix composites. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 69, 755–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Duigou, A.L.; Requile, S.; Beaugrand, J.; Scarpa, F.; Castro, M. Natural fibres actuators for smart bio-inspired hydromorph biocomposites. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 125009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Cattenone, A.; Morganti, S.; Alaimo, G.; Auricchio, F. Finite element analysis of additive manufacturing based on fused deposition modeling: Distortions prediction and comparison with experimental data. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2019, 141, 011010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, H.; Nagel, K.N.; Al-Qas, A.; Gibbons, E.; Lee, J.J.Y. Additive manufacturing with bioinspired sustainable product design: A conceptual model. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 26, 880–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sarvestani, H.Y.; Mirkhalaf, M.; Akbarzadeh, A.; Backman, D.; Genest, M.; Ashrafi, B. Multilayered architectured ceramic panels with weak interfaces: Energy absorption and multi-hit capabilities. Mater. Des. 2019, 167, 107627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Neveu, F.; Castanié, B.; Olivier, P. The GAP methodology: A new way to design composite structures. Mater. Des. 2019, 172, 107755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, Z.; Lei, H.; Xu, M.; Hua, J.; Li, C.; Fang, D. Out-of-plane compressive performance and energy absorption of multi-layer graded sinusoidal corrugated sandwich panels. Mater. Des. 2019, 178, 107858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kaminski, M.; Loth, E.; Griffith, D.T.; Qin, C. (Chris) Ground testing of a 1% gravo-aeroelastically scaled additively-manufactured wind turbine blade with bio-inspired structural design. Renew. Energy 2020, 148, 639–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yang, E.; Leary, M.; Lozanovski, B.; Downing, D.; Mazur, M.; Sarker, A.; Khorasani, A.; Jones, A.; Maconachie, T.; Bateman, S.; et al. Effect of geometry on the mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V Gyroid structures fabricated via SLM: A numerical study. Mater. Des. 2019, 184, 108165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sun, Y.; Tian, W.; Zhang, T.; Chen, P.; Li, M. Strength and toughness enhancement in 3d printing via bioinspired tool path. Mater. Des. 2020, 185, 108239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xiang, X.; Zou, S.; Ha, N.S.; Lu, G.; Kong, I. Energy absorption of bio-inspired multi-layered graded foam-filled structures under axial crushing. Compos. Part B Eng. 2020, 198, 108216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jia, Z.; Yu, Y.; Wang, L. Learning from nature: Use material architecture to break the performance tradeoffs. Mater. Des. 2019, 168, 107650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Plaschke, L.; Vezzoli, C.; Scullica, F. Product Design for Sustainability –Guidelines for the Life Cycle Design of Office Furniture. In Proceedings of the 3rd LeNS World Distributed Conference, Mexico City, Mexico, Curitiba, Brasil, Cape Town, South Africa, Bangalore, India, Beijing, China, Milan, Italy, 3–5 April 2019; pp. 915–919. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339745792 (accessed on 28 May 2021).
  52. Wang, D.; Dongdong, C.; Zeyu, C. Recent progress in 3D printing of bioinspired structures. Front. Mater. 2020, 7, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kalantari, S.; Adimi, N.; Zarkesh, A. Connections between mathematics, bionic and architecture through minimal surfaces: Fabricate minimal surfaces digitally for architectural application via computational design. Proceedingsof the 2nd International Congress on Science and Engineering, Paris, France, 21 August 2020. [Google Scholar]
  54. Ma, W.; Xie, S.; Li, Z. Mechanical performance of bio-inspired corrugated tubes with varying vertex configurations. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2020, 172, 105399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Du, Y.; Gu, D.; Xi, L.; Dai, D.; Gao, T.; Zhu, J.; Ma, C. Laser additive manufacturing of bio-inspired lattice structure: Forming quality, microstructure and energy absorption behavior. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2020, 773, 138857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Essassi, K.; Rebiere, J.-L.; El Mahi, A.; Ben Souf, M.A.; Bouguecha, A.; Haddar, M. Experimental and analytical investigation of the bending behaviour of 3D-printed bio-based sandwich structures composites with auxetic core under cyclic fatigue tests. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2020, 131, 105775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhu, H.; Li, D.-S.; Han, W.-F.; Jiang, L. Experimental and numerical study of in-plane compressive properties and failure of 3D six-directional braided composites with large braiding angle. Mater. Des. 2020, 195, 108917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yang, F.; Xie, W.; Meng, S. Impact and blast performance enhancement in bio-inspired helicoidal structures: A numerical study. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2020, 142, 104025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Díaz-Tena, E.; Barona, A.; Gallastegui, G.; Rodríguez, A.; De Lacalle, L.N.L.; Elías, A. Biomachining: Metal etching via microorganisms. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2016, 37, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Díaz-Tena, E.; Gallastegui, G.; Hipperdinger, M.; Donati, E.; Ramírez, M.; Rodríguez, A.; de Lacalle, L.L.; Elías, A. New advances in copper biomachining by iron-oxidizing bacteria. Corros. Sci. 2016, 112, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ferrand, L.H.; Bouville, F.; Niebel, T.P.; Studart, A.R. Magnetically assisted slip casting of bioinspired heterogeneous composites. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 1172–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Abdulrahim, M.; Lind, R. Flight testing and response characteristics of a variable gull-wing morphing aircraft. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Providence, RI, USA, 16–19 August 2004; p. 5113. [Google Scholar]
  63. Jones, K.D.; Bradshaw, C.J.; Papadopoulos, J.; Platzer, M.F. Bio-inspired design of flapping-wings microair vehicles. Aeronaut. J. 2005, 109, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fish, F.E.; Weber, P.W.; Murray, M.M.; Howle, L.E. The Tubercles on Humpback Whales’ Flippers: Application of Bio-Inspired Technology. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2011, 51, 203–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Nychka, J.A.; Chen, P.-Y. Natureas Inspirationin Materials Science and Engineering. JOM 2012, 64, 446–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Galantai, V.P.; Sofla, A.Y.N.; Meguid, S.A.; Tan, K.T.; Yeo, W.K. Bio-inspired wing morphing for unmanned aerial vehicles using intelligent materials. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 2011, 8, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hassanalian, M.; Throneberry, G.; Abdelkefi, A. Wing shape and dynamic twist design of bio-inspired nano air vehicles for forward flight purposes. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2017, 68, 518–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Van Truong, T.; Nguyen, Q.-V.; Lee, H.P. Bio-Inspired Flexible Flapping Wings with Elastic Deformation. Aerospace 2017, 4, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bluman, J.E.; Pohly, J.A.; Sridhar, M.K.; Kang, C.-K.; Landrum, D.B.; Fahimi, F.; Aono, H. Achieving bioinspired flapping wing hovering flight solutions on Mars via wing scaling. Bioinspiration Biomim. 2018, 13, 046010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Lu, Z.; DeBiasi, M.; Nguyen, Q.-V.; Chan, W.-L. Bioinspired Low-Noise Wing Design for a Two-Winged Flapping-Wing Micro Air Vehicle. AIAA J. 2018, 56, 4697–4705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ito, M.R.; Duan, C.; Wissa, A.A. The function of the alulaon engineered wings: A detailed experimental investigation of a bioinspired leading-edge device. Bioinspiration Biomim. 2019, 14, 056015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hui, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, G. Aerodynamic performance investigation on a morphing unmanned aerial vehicle with bio-inspired discrete wing structures. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2019, 95, 105419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Dwivedi, Y.D.; Bhargava, V. Aerodynamic characterization of bio inspired corrugated wings. Moj. App. Bio. Biomech. 2019, 3, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  74. Abbasi, S.H.; Mahmood, A. Modeling, Simulation and Control of a Bio-Inspired Electromechanical Feather for Gust Mitigation in Flapping Wing UAV. In Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Communication, Computing and Digital systems (C-CODE), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Islamabad, Pakistan, 6–7 March 2019; pp. 195–200. [Google Scholar]
  75. Sihite, E.; Kelly, P.; Ramezani, A. Computational structure design of a bio-inspired armwing mechanism. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2020, 5, 5929–5936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Meng, L.; Lan, X.; Zhao, J.; Wang, Z. Equivalent models and mechanical properties of bio-inspired corrugated sandwich structures subjected to bending loads. Compos. Struct. 2020, 244, 112257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Fronczek, J.W.; Nadipuram, R.P. Bio-inspired sensor swarms to detect leaks in pressurized systems. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 12 October 2005, Volume.2; pp. 1967–1972.
  78. Zufferey, J.C.; Floreano, D. Fly-inspired visual steering of an ultralight indoor aircraft. IEEE Trans. Robot. 2006, 22, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Juston, R.; Viollet, S.; Kerhuel, L.; Franceschini, N. High performance optical angular position sensing at low-cost: A bio-inspired approach. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE SENSORS Proceedings; Institute of Electricaland Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Limerick, Ireland, 28–31 October 2011; pp. 378–381. [Google Scholar]
  80. Marefat, F.; Partovi, A.; Mousavinia, A. A hemispherical omni-directional bioinspired optical sensor. In Proceedings of the 20th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE2012), Tehran, Iran, 15–17 May 2012; pp. 668–672. [Google Scholar]
  81. Kerhuel, L.; Viollet, S.; Franceschini, N. The VODKA Sensor: ABio-Inspired Hyperacute Optical Position Sensing Device. IEEE Sens. J. 2011, 12, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Wood, K.T.; Estrada, S.A.; Richardson, T.; Windsor, S. Distributed Pressure Sensing–Based Flight Control for Small Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aerial Systems. J. Aircr. 2019, 56, 1951–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Mohamed, A.; Watkins, S.; Fisher, A.; Marino, M.; Massey, K.; Clothier, R. Bioinspiredwing -surface pressure sensing for attitude control of micro air vehicles. J. Aircr. 2015, 52, 827–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Araujo-Estrada, S.A.; Salama, F.; Greatwood, C.M.; Wood, K.T.; Richardson, T.S.; Windsor, S.P. Bio-inspired Distributed Strain and Airflow Sensing for Small Unmanned Air Vehicle Flight Control. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), GrapeVine, TX, USA, 9–13 January 2017; p. 1487. [Google Scholar]
  85. Ren, Z.; Fu, W.; Zhu, S.; Yan, B.; Yan, J. Bio-inspired neural adaptive control of a small unmanned aerial vehicle based on airflow sensors. Sensors 2018, 18, 3233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Zhao, J.; Hu, C.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Z.; Yue, S. A bio-inspired collision detector for small quadcopter. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Riode Janeiro, Brazil, 8–13 July 2018; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  87. Frost, S.A.; Yates, L.A.; Kumagai, H.S. Bioinspired Optical Sensor for Remote Measurement of Small Displacements at a Distance. Biomimetics 2018, 3, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Park, S.; Lee, K.; Song, H.; Cho, J.; Park, S.-Y.; Yoon, E. Low-Power, Bio-Inspired Time-Stamp-Based 2-D Optic Flow Sensor for Artificial Compound Eyes of Micro Air Vehicles. IEEE Sensors J. 2019, 19, 12059–12068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gavrilović, N.; Bronz, M.; Moschetta, J.-M. Bioinspired Energy Harvesting from Atmospheric Phenomena for Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 2020, 43, 685–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Estrada, A.; Sergio, A.; Windsor, S.P. Aerodynamic State and Loads Estimation Using Bioinspired Distributed Sensing. J. Aircr. 2020, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Pandremenos, J.; Vasiliadis, E.; Chryssolouris, G. Design architectures in biology. In Proceedings of the 3rd CIRP Conferenceon Biomanufacturing, Athens, Greece, 16–18 May 2012; pp. 448–452. [Google Scholar]
  92. Zhao, J.; Yan, S.; Deng, L.; Huang, H.; Liu, Y. Design and analysis of biomimetic nose cone for morphing of aerospace vehicle. J. Bionic Eng. 2017, 14, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Dai, H.; Jing, X.; Wang, Y.; Yue, X.; Yuan, J. Post-capture vibration suppression of spacecraft via abio-inspired isolation system. Mech. Syst. Signal. Process. 2018, 105, 214–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Le, V.T.; Goo, N.M. Thermomechanical performance of bio-inspired corrugated -core sandwich structure for a thermal protection system panel. Appl. Sci. 2019, 24, 5541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Sherman, M.; Hassanalian, M.; Bradley, S. Dandelion-Inspired Micro-Rovers: Novel Concept of Extraterrestrial Systems forMars Exploration. In Proceedings of the AIAA AVIATION 2020 FORUM, VirtualEvent, 15–19 June 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhang, R.; Pang, H.; Ji, Q.; Li, G.; Dong, W.; Wen, L.; Li, J. Structure design and traction trafficability analysis of multi-posture wheel-legs bionic walking wheels for sand terrain. J. Terramechanics 2020, 91, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Dai, H.; Cao, X.; Jing, X.; Wang, X.; Yue, X. Bio-inspired anti-impact manipulator for capturing non-cooperative spacecraft: Theory and experiment. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2020, 142, 106785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Vernerey, F.J.; Barthelat, F. Skin and scales of teleost fish: Simple structure but high performance and multiple functions. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2014, 68, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The bio-inspired design methods [19].
Figure 1. The bio-inspired design methods [19].
Applsci 11 05054 g001
Figure 2. Methodology adopted in bio-inspired design review.
Figure 2. Methodology adopted in bio-inspired design review.
Applsci 11 05054 g002
Figure 3. Definition of analysis metrics for T joint performance [25].
Figure 3. Definition of analysis metrics for T joint performance [25].
Applsci 11 05054 g003
Figure 4. The various cellular structures in insects (a) Honeycomb Structure (b) Ladybug Structure- Tubular (c) Beetle Structure- Tubular Structure [26].
Figure 4. The various cellular structures in insects (a) Honeycomb Structure (b) Ladybug Structure- Tubular (c) Beetle Structure- Tubular Structure [26].
Applsci 11 05054 g004
Figure 5. Additive manufacturing to reform optimize biomimetic [28].
Figure 5. Additive manufacturing to reform optimize biomimetic [28].
Applsci 11 05054 g005
Figure 6. An assessment of material selection methods [32].
Figure 6. An assessment of material selection methods [32].
Applsci 11 05054 g006
Figure 7. A framework for the application of biomimicry [37].
Figure 7. A framework for the application of biomimicry [37].
Applsci 11 05054 g007
Figure 8. Additive Manufacturing Methods [28].
Figure 8. Additive Manufacturing Methods [28].
Applsci 11 05054 g008
Figure 9. Procedure for AM testing [28].
Figure 9. Procedure for AM testing [28].
Applsci 11 05054 g009
Figure 10. Research Methodology [42].
Figure 10. Research Methodology [42].
Applsci 11 05054 g010
Figure 11. GAP Methodology [44].
Figure 11. GAP Methodology [44].
Applsci 11 05054 g011
Figure 12. Types of filling paths [44].
Figure 12. Types of filling paths [44].
Applsci 11 05054 g012
Figure 13. Performance Trade-offs in Bio-inspired structures [50].
Figure 13. Performance Trade-offs in Bio-inspired structures [50].
Applsci 11 05054 g013
Figure 14. Bio-inspired Structure [52].
Figure 14. Bio-inspired Structure [52].
Applsci 11 05054 g014
Figure 15. Change in wing structure based on variable gull morphing capabilities [62].
Figure 15. Change in wing structure based on variable gull morphing capabilities [62].
Applsci 11 05054 g015
Figure 16. Tubercles on the leading edge of the wings and stabilizers of an aircraft [64].
Figure 16. Tubercles on the leading edge of the wings and stabilizers of an aircraft [64].
Applsci 11 05054 g016
Figure 17. Design for a flexing parallelogram wing [66].
Figure 17. Design for a flexing parallelogram wing [66].
Applsci 11 05054 g017
Figure 18. Mechanism for flapping to analyse wing deformations [68].
Figure 18. Mechanism for flapping to analyse wing deformations [68].
Applsci 11 05054 g018
Figure 19. A deployed alula on the wing of the bird [71].
Figure 19. A deployed alula on the wing of the bird [71].
Applsci 11 05054 g019
Figure 20. Models fabricated for wind tunnel testing (a) Completely folded, discrete wing design (b) Completely folded, continuous wing design [72].
Figure 20. Models fabricated for wind tunnel testing (a) Completely folded, discrete wing design (b) Completely folded, continuous wing design [72].
Applsci 11 05054 g020
Figure 21. Mechanisms to offset turbulent gusts of wind (a) covert feathers in birds (b) positioning of a GMS unit [74].
Figure 21. Mechanisms to offset turbulent gusts of wind (a) covert feathers in birds (b) positioning of a GMS unit [74].
Applsci 11 05054 g021
Figure 22. Computer-aided design of the arm wing structure mimicking a Bat’s wing [75].
Figure 22. Computer-aided design of the arm wing structure mimicking a Bat’s wing [75].
Applsci 11 05054 g022
Figure 23. Optic sensors based on Elementary Motion Detection (a) Compound eye of a fly (b) A bio mimicked synthetic compound eye [80].
Figure 23. Optic sensors based on Elementary Motion Detection (a) Compound eye of a fly (b) A bio mimicked synthetic compound eye [80].
Applsci 11 05054 g023
Figure 24. VODKA sensor mounted onto an MAV [81].
Figure 24. VODKA sensor mounted onto an MAV [81].
Applsci 11 05054 g024
Figure 25. An in-orbit capture, with the BIQS system to suppress post-capture vibrations [93].
Figure 25. An in-orbit capture, with the BIQS system to suppress post-capture vibrations [93].
Applsci 11 05054 g025
Figure 26. (a) The seeds of a dandelion being driven away by the wind (b) micro flying robots being detached from the spherical rover and being driven by the Martian wind [95].
Figure 26. (a) The seeds of a dandelion being driven away by the wind (b) micro flying robots being detached from the spherical rover and being driven by the Martian wind [95].
Applsci 11 05054 g026
Table 1. Bio-inspired material properties [24].
Table 1. Bio-inspired material properties [24].
MaterialCellular StructurePropertiesDiagram
Hair [10]Keratin protein/Micro fibrils Long degradation time Applsci 11 05054 i001
Deep-Sea glass sponges [14]Layers of silica glued with protein Increased toughness and lightweight Applsci 11 05054 i002
Nacre and other Hybrids [20]Platelets of calcium carbonate/Aragonite Anisotropic material properties Applsci 11 05054 i003
Silk [21]Long chains of amino acids Toughness (comparable to Kevlar)/Biodegradable Applsci 11 05054 i004
Turtle Shell [22]Rib with suture touches Flexibility/ lower density/Higher Strength Applsci 11 05054 i005
Bone [23]Lamellae and Osteons Crack deflection, crack bridging, and deflection/Self-repair Applsci 11 05054 i006
Table 2. Review of Materials used in Bio-inspired design.
Table 2. Review of Materials used in Bio-inspired design.
Research WorkContributionsInferences
Burns et al. [25]Investigation of T joint performanceToughening mechanisms in tree branch joints
Gu [24]Bio-inspired CompositesUse of AM technique in Bio-inspired
Wang et al. [33]Fabrication of nano-graphene composites Utilization of skin structure for material design
Xiang et al. [26]Honeycomb structure under impact loading Honeycomb structure (with circular tubes) is the best under impact loading by changing the structures’ height.
Feng et al. [27]Structural effects on ABS in nanostructure mixtureImpregnating CNC on ABS, inspired by wood
Hogan et al. [28]Design method for bio-inspired structureUsing FEA to optimize bio-inspired structures
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Budholiya, S.; Bhat, A.; Raj, S.A.; Hameed Sultan, M.T.; Md Shah, A.U.; A. Basri, A. State of the Art Review about Bio-Inspired Design and Applications: An Aerospace Perspective. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5054. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115054

AMA Style

Budholiya S, Bhat A, Raj SA, Hameed Sultan MT, Md Shah AU, A. Basri A. State of the Art Review about Bio-Inspired Design and Applications: An Aerospace Perspective. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(11):5054. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115054

Chicago/Turabian Style

Budholiya, Sejal, Aayush Bhat, S. Aravind Raj, Mohamed Thariq Hameed Sultan, Ain Umaira Md Shah, and Adi A. Basri. 2021. "State of the Art Review about Bio-Inspired Design and Applications: An Aerospace Perspective" Applied Sciences 11, no. 11: 5054. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115054

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop