Next Article in Journal
Optimizing Viscoelastic Properties of Rubber Compounds for Ballistic Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
New and Emerging Risk Factors in Occupational Health
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of Recent Developments and Advances in Eco-Friendly Geopolymer Concrete
Previous Article in Special Issue
The South African Nurse’s Knowledge of Occupational Human Immunodeficiency Virus Postexposure Prophylaxis in the Era of Controlled and Stable HIV Prevalence
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Personalized Prevention in Mercury-Induced Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Case Report

1
Department of Life Sciences & Public Health, Postgraduate School of Occupational Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
2
Occupational Health, Department of Woman, Child & Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
3
Neuromuscolar Center, Department of Woman, Child & Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
4
National Research Council—Institute of Clinical Physiology (CNR—IFC), Lecce unit, 73100 Lecce, Italy
5
Health Service Department, Italian State Police, Ministry of Interior, 00184 Roma, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(21), 7839; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217839
Submission received: 9 October 2020 / Revised: 28 October 2020 / Accepted: 1 November 2020 / Published: 5 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New and Emerging Risks in Occupational Health)

Abstract

:

Featured Application

Knowing the effects observed in a worker exposed to mercury can improve the prevention of the risks associated with this toxic metal.

Abstract

Chronic exposure to low levels of mercury is involved in the development of motor neuron diseases (MND). Genetic alterations may have a crucial role in the onset and progression. We presented a case of a TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1)-mutated 54-year-old male worker who developed a MND due to chronic mercury exposure at work. He was employed in a chlor-alkali plant in Central Italy. After two years of employment he had acute mercury intoxication with suggestive neurological symptoms and a high urinary level of the metal. Through years, many episodes of intoxication occurred, but he continued to perform the same job and be exposed to mercury. After yet another episode of intoxication in 2013, he showed fasciculations of the upper limbs and trunk, and electromyographic activity patterns were consistent with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). In 2016, a genetic test revealed a mutation of TBK1, an ALS-related gene. This case highlights the important role of genetics in personalized occupational medicine. Occupational physicians should use genetic tests to identify conditions of individual susceptibility in workers with documented frequent episodes of mercury intoxication recorded during health surveillance programs to customize prevention measures in the workplace and act before damage appears.

1. Introduction

Mercury (Hg) is a naturally occurring toxic heavy metal [1,2] and a global pollutant [3]. Occupational exposure to elemental inorganic mercury may cause neurological and other adverse effects in exposed workers [4,5,6]. Even if its neurotoxic effects have been known for more than 300 years [7], occupational exposure may still be relevant in certain activities such as mining and metal working [8,9,10], production and waste of fluorescent lamps [11,12] and incinerators [13,14], recycling [15,16], concrete processing [17], battery production [18], thermometer and precision instrument manufacturing [19], dental care [20], and other industrial activities. Chlor-alkali plants have been extensively studied over the past 60 years for being at the origin of the ecological disaster of Minamata [21] and for neurological pathologies in exposed workers [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31].
Trends in production and sales of Hg are rapidly increasing according to high global Hg demands (Global Chemicals Outlook II, 2019) [32]; consequently, the number of exposed workers is increasing. Occupational risk prevention is based on the adoption of environmental prevention measures, good work practices [33], and biological monitoring of workers. Mercury in urine (U-Hg) is commonly used to indicate exposure in occupational cohorts [34]. The reference values for U-Hg have been progressively reduced over years; for example, the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH®) has reduced the Biological Exposure Index (BEI®) for U-Hg from 35 (2007) to 20 µg/g (2017) [35].
A systematic review of neurotoxicity studies in Hg-exposed workers confirmed dose-relatedness of objective neurological effects, including tremor, impaired coordination, abnormal reflexes, and reduced performance on neurobehavioral tests of manual dexterity and motor speed [36]. The metal mainly affects the central nervous system and is expressed in typical motor neuron diseases (MNDs). It has been long known that MNDs have a polyfactorial pathogenesis, and environmental influence has been associated with sporadic forms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), which is the most common MND in adults [37]. Moreover, huge differences in the onset and severity of neurological symptoms in individuals with a comparable level of exposure to Hg have been reported. This points up the role of the underlying genetic factors that may modify Hg uptake, biotransformation, distribution, and elimination, and, as a result, the effective dose, i.e., the dose that produces a biological response [38]. Furthermore, through the years, several epigenetic and genetic characteristics have been associated with Hg neurotoxicity [39].
In this short paper, we reported the case of a worker exposed to Hg in a chlor-alkali plant, who presented several episodes of work-related neurotoxicity and, finally, developed ALS. Genetic tests showed that he had a TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) mutation.

2. Case Presentation

A 54-year-old male worker has been working in a large chlor-alkali plant in Central Italy since 1986 as a small industrial plant maintenance contractor. He mainly performed maintenance activities in Hg cells, where Hg cathodes were working in brine (saltwater—mainly sodium chlorine or, to a lesser extent, potassium chloride), or was assigned to piping and filter cleaning. He was exposed to inorganic Hg, as well as other chemical (chloromethane, acids and bases, welding fumes) and physical (noise, heavy load handling) agents.
The medical history was not contributory, but the familiar history was noticeable for neurological disorders in first degree relatives (i.e., his mother was affected by Parkinson’s disease and deceased from a stroke, two brothers were affected by myogenic torticollis). He had middle-lower education and was not a smoker. The patient followed the Mediterranean diet, consuming fish on average 3–5 times per month.
He was subjected to periodic medical examinations supplemented by biological monitoring of urinary Hg tests (U-Hg) through occupational health surveillance programs.
In 1988, after working on cleaning mercury cells, he manifested tremor, vertigo, marked weakness, ataxia, and fever. U-Hg level of 127 μg/g creatinine, significantly higher than the biological exposure limit BEI® (20 μg/g creatinine), was observed. He was temporarily removed from the job for two weeks, but no occupational injury was reported to the competent authorities. In the following years, a certain number of episodes of malaise, dizziness or confusion, agitation, and insomnia, associated with U-Hg values between 60 and 80 μg/g creatinine, occurred. None of these recurrent episodes of subacute intoxication were reported to the competent Italian authorities. The occupational physician responsible for medical surveillance of workers declared him “fit for work”. As a result, he was employed with the same working tasks for over 20 years. In 2008, the same occupational physician prescribed that he could not be exposed to respiratory irritants and chemical risk. Despite this restriction, however, he continued his previous activities.
In October 2012, at the end of the work shift, he reported unpleasant metallic taste, nausea, dry mouth, difficulty in swallowing, and voice lowering. In the following working days, other symptoms appeared, such as marked weakness, muscle cramps, intentional tremors hindering work performance (e.g., welding of metal staples). In August 2013, fasciculations of the upper limbs and trunk were also evident. Electromyographic examination showed denervation potentials in the upper limb muscles (deltoid muscle bilaterally and the right vastus lateralis) and abnormal spontaneous activity in the lower limb muscles (plantar interosseous and anterior tibial muscle, bilaterally).
In December 2013, he came to our attention. Neurological examination showed high-frequency postural tremor (right side > left side) occurring in standing position, with dysarthria and tongue fasciculations, weakness and atrophy of the small hand muscles, fasciculation in all four limbs, with no signs of pyramidal tract involvement. Hematochemical parameters were normal. Brain MRI scan documented no signs of brain impairment. In March 2014, lung function tests showed a restrictive deficit, supposed to be a consequence of limited diaphragm excursion due to neurological impairment.
Genetic screening for Kennedy disease showed a negative result in the target gene (Androgen Receptor, AR). In consideration of the history of recurrent episodes of Hg intoxication, we reported the suspicion of occupational mercury poisoning to the National Italian Occupational Insurance Authority (INAIL), which refused the claim. The patient continued to be treated by the Neurology Department of our university hospital, which diagnosed amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Over the following years, he presented progressive weakness involving proximal upper limbs and respiratory muscles. Due to respiratory failure, he received mechanical ventilation through a tracheostomy, 36 months after the onset of the symptoms. In 2016, further analysis of major ALS genes using the technique of next generation sequencing, revealed deletion c.1852_1854delGAA: p.E618del in the TBK1 gene.
In subsequent years, lung function parameters were getting worse and nocturnal apnea appeared. Meanwhile, he sued the INAIL Institute, thus obtaining that the disease was recognized and compensated.

3. Discussion

In this case report, we showed a worker who was chronically exposed to Hg in a chlor-alkali plant and developed ALS after recurrent episodes of neurotoxicity. Interestingly, genetic testing carried out in this worker showed a TBK1 mutation (deletion in c.1852_1854delGAA: p.E618del). ALS is the most common neurodegenerative disease affecting motor neurons. The diagnosis of ALS is based on two different criteria: the revised El Escorial criteria (rEEC) [40] and the Awaji criteria [41], that may have overall superiority [42], though they are not always more sensitive than rEEC [43]. The criteria have high inter-rater variation [44]. Although up to 10% of ALS is heritable (familial ALS) and, in most cases, caused by genetic mutations, the majority of the cases of this fatal neurodegenerative disease occurs in individuals with no prior family history (sporadic ALS), and is of unknown etiology. As it is a complex and heterogeneous disease, polyfactorial interaction between genetic characteristics, metabolic, and environmental factors might be at the basis of sporadic ALS cases [45]. Regarding the genetic factors, through the years, several genetic mutations which interfere with the onset and progression of the disease, have been associated with ALS, being either causative or disease-modifying. Mutations can have different cellular sites of attack: coding of proteins implicated in the antioxidative response system (e.g., SOD1), RNA stability, function and metabolism, nucleocytoplasmic trafficking (e.g., ANG, TARDBP, FUS, HNRNPA1, MATR3), cytoskeletal dynamics (e.g., DCTN1, PFN1, TUBA4A), the ubiquitin-proteasome system (e.g., VCP), mitochondrial functions (e.g., CHCHD10), and autophagic pathways (e.g., C9ORF72, OPTN, UBQLN2, SQSTM1, VCP, CCNF, TBK1) [46]. In particular, mutations in TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) have been associated with the sporadic form of ALS and other neurological diseases such as frontotemporal dementia [47]. The frequency of TBK1 variants is 0.5–1.6% in pure ALS patients [48], and 3.5–4.5% in ALS cases with frontotemporal dementia [49]. The protein encoded by TBK1 is a serine/threonine protein kinase, which has an important role in the induction of autophagy and innate immune response pathways [50]. Moreover, TBK1 variants are associated with reduction of the corresponding protein level [51], leading to accumulation of protein aggregates and defective mitochondria in motor neurons, which may contribute to ALS pathology by disrupting axonal transport [50].
In addition to and, most probably, in association with the genetic background, a proportion of ALS cases are likely to be attributable to occupational exposure. High-dose occupational exposure of workers in the 1950s and 1980s induced several cases of neurological impairment similar to ALS, which regressed after cessation of exposure [52,53,54,55]. Nowadays, low-dose occupational exposure of sensitive individuals remains an occupational health concern worldwide.
Genetic polymorphisms and epigenetic changes have been correlated to different health effects of Hg in exposed workers [56]. For example, it is known that Hg can induce direct and indirect DNA post-translational modifications (PTMs) such as phosphorylation, ubiquitination, acetylation, nitrosylation, and S-mercuration on targeted proteins implicated in many cellular pathways [57,58]. Specific polymorphisms of glutathione-related genes (e.g., glutamate-cysteine ligase regulatory subunit, glutamate-cysteine ligase), Hg transporter proteins (e.g., MTs, ABCs), cytochrome p450 3A, ε4 APOE, and Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) have been associated with the magnitude of toxic Hg effects in biological tissues [39,58,59,60,61]. The induction of oxidative stress, which can activate the process of mitochondrial autophagy, is the initial step of Hg neurotoxicity [62]. Autophagy represents an important defense mechanism in cells that allows to selectively eliminate organelles and/or dysfunctional proteins, subsequently reusing their molecular components. Exposure to toxic metals (Hg included) can induce a series of cellular metabolic and energetic alterations, including faulty autophagy [62,63]. Moreover, up-to-date evidence highlights the existence of mitoautophagy, a self-destructive mitochondrial dysfunction which occurs at early stages of ALS [64]. Mitochondrial autophagy can be hypothesized as a common link for both ALS and Hg intoxication. In fact, Hg ions have been implicated in faulty mitochondrial autophagy even with continuous low-dose exposures [63]. Studies associating mercury and ALS have been conducted mainly with methylmercury, which is the most toxic form of the metal. In experimental conditions, methylmercury (MeHg) caused LDH release, caspase activation, cell-cycle alteration, and ROS generation, in accordance with a decrease in cell viability [65]. The neurotoxicity of Hg (particularly MeHg) is associated with three main mechanisms: (1) increase of intracellular Ca2+ levels; (2) induction of oxidative stress by overproduction of ROS or by reduced oxidative defense capacity; (3) interactions with sulfhydryl groups with the formation of a thiol-containing complex [66]. Intracellular calcium levels also appear to be linked to autophagic processes within cells [67]. Autophagic processes and the formation of autophagosomes increase in cells exposed to Cys-S-Hg-S-Cys [68]. HgCl2 treatments decreased mitochondrial functionality, suggesting that nonessential metals compromise mitochondrial homeostasis and activity [69]. Moreover, the binding of MeHg to GSH is known to decrease the availability of this antioxidant, exposing cells to free-radical-mediated damage [70].
Since ALS has a multifactorial genesis, in the reported case, both genetic predisposition (pathogenic TBK1 variant) and occupational Hg exposure concurred in the development of the disease. A conceivable hypothesis suggests that acute/subacute subclinical reduction in the motor neuron pool may occur with the initial phases of occupational exposure to Hg, but the defect remains unrecognized until that pool becomes further depleted through the normal aging process [71] or the additive effect of several successive occupational exposures.
This case proved the key role of health surveillance in the workplace. The great variability in the individual responses of workers requires strong attention by the occupational physician, who must promptly identify the first symptoms of an excessive response. In the reported case, the observation of intermittent subacute flares of Hg intoxication, firmly assessed through high Hg levels in urine, should have been considered a red flag that must induce deeper analysis of the worker’s genetic pattern long before the onset of the neurological disorder.
The intervention of the occupational physician to prevent occupational mercury intoxication should be directed primarily at modifying the environment, rather than assessing the worker’s adaptation to the job. However, a small maintenance contractor has little chance of influencing the chlor-alkali plant safety strategy. In these cases, the decision to allow exposure to risk, declaring the worker “fit for the job”, or to declare him unfit, exposing him to dismissal, is very difficult. Even if the causes of ALS are multifactorial and a single gene mutation might not be sufficient to cause ALS, personalized occupational health practices and searching for genetic biomarkers of susceptibility in selected cases with documented frequent episodes of mercury intoxication recorded during health surveillance programs could be an aid in the doctor’s decision, allowing to customize prevention measures in the workplace and act before serious and irreversible consequences of occupational exposure appear. The use of genetic tests must be reserved for specifically motivated cases and should not be considered a universal screening measure. Ethical considerations [72] and the Italian Constitution [73] do not allow occupational physicians to perform genetic screening tests in the pre-assumptive phase. Moreover, the search for all the genes that could be associated with increased mercury toxicity is expensive and complicated and, therefore, cannot be applied to everyone, but must be reserved for cases with reasoned suspicion. Conversely, inappropriate genetic testing could easily become a basis for discrimination. Laws were produced against this danger, such as the Genetic Information Non-discrimination Act (GINA) in the USA, and similar laws in other countries [74], even if uniform protection of workers from genetic discrimination is still far from being reached [75]. The aim of the occupational health practice remains “to take into account workers’ state of health to sustain and improve their working capacity and ability, and contribute to the establishment and maintenance of a safe and healthy working environment for all”, as stated in the International Code of Ethics for occupational health professionals [72]. We must orient genetic research to this goal.
The main limitation of this study is the report of a single case. The low incidence of ALS (1.75/100,000 person/years) [76] makes it difficult to collect cases in the workplace. The main strength of the study is the collection of occupational history of over 20 years.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, our work gave further data in favor of the potential role of inorganic Hg in ALS genesis. Furthermore, it provided significant insights on the magnitude of investigations and monitoring activity at the workplace for early diagnosis of occupational diseases. A better understanding of the molecular mechanism of Hg poisoning and its potential interaction with the genetic background may open new horizons for reducing occupational risk.

Author Contributions

N.M.: concepted and designed the article; N.M. and M.S.: performed the analysis of the medical records; N.M.: drafted the manuscript; F.C. and E.S.: revised the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interests.

Ethic Statement

We obtained informed written consent from the patient, authorizing publication of the clinical case. His anonymity has been preserved.

References

  1. Clarkson, T.W.; Magos, L. The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2006, 36, 609–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bernhoft, R.A. Mercury toxicity and treatment: A review of the literature. J. Environ. Public Health 2012, 2012, 460508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sakamoto, M.; Nakamura, M.; Murata, K. Mercury as a Global Pollutant and Mercury Exposure Assessment and Health Effects. Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2018, 73, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Bjørklund, G.; Dadar, M.; Mutter, J.; Aaseth, J. The toxicology of mercury: Current research and emerging trends. Environ. Res. 2017, 159, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Calabrese, E.J.; Iavicoli, I.; Calabrese, V.; Cory-Slechta, D.A.; Giordano, J. Elemental mercury neurotoxicity and clinical recovery of function: A review of findings, and implications for occupational health. Environ. Res. 2018, 163, 134–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cariccio, V.L.; Samà, A.; Bramanti, P.; Mazzon, E. Mercury Involvement in Neuronal Damage and in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2019, 187, 341–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ramazzini, B. The Disease of Workers (De Morbis Artificum Diatriba, 1700–1713); Carnevale, F., Mendini, M., Moriani, G., Eds.; Cierre Edizioni: Verona, Italy, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kristensen, A.K.; Thomsen, J.F.; Mikkelsen, S. A review of mercury exposure among artisanal small-scale gold miners in developing countries. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2014, 87, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Afrifa, J.; Opoku, Y.K.; Gyamerah, E.O.; Ashiagbor, G.; Sorkpor, R.D. The Clinical Importance of the Mercury Problem in Artisanal Small-Scale Gold Mining. Front. Public Health 2019, 29, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. El-Sayed, L.H.; Ghoneim, H.M.; El-Sayed, M.H.; Deimian, S.R.; Adam, A.N.; Rawash, S.N.A.; Rawash, N.M.A.; Ursos, P. Immunological abnormalities in workers exposed to pollutants at an Egyptian copper company. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2003, 25, 473–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Darvishi, E.; Assari, M.J.; Farhadian, M.; Chavoshi, E.; Ehsani, H.R. Occupational exposure to mercury vapor in a compact fluorescent lamp factory: Evaluation of personal, ambient air, and biological monitoring. Toxicol. Ind. Health 2019, 35, 304–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chang, T.C.; You, S.J.; Yu, B.S.; Kong, H.W. The fate and management of high mercury-containing lamps from high technology industry. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 141, 784–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wrbitzky, R.; Göen, T.; Letzel, S.; Frank, F.; Angerer, J. Internal exposure of waste incineration workers to organic and inorganic substances. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 1995, 68, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fierens, S.; Mairesse, H.; Heilier, J.F.; Focant, J.F.; Eppe, G.; De Pauw, E.; Bernard, A. Impact of iron and steel industry and waste incinerators on human exposure to dioxins, PCBs, and heavy metals: Results of a cross-sectional study in Belgium. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 2007, 70, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ceballos, D.; Beaucham, C.; Page, E. Metal Exposures at three U.S. electronic scrap recycling facilities. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2017, 14, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Poole, C.J.M.; Basu, S. Systematic Review: Occupational illness in the waste and recycling sector. Occup. Med. 2017, 67, 626–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Wang, J.; Hayes, J.; Wu, C.Y.; Townsend, T.; Schert, J.; Vinson, T.; Deliz, K.; Bonzongo, J.C. Characterization of vapor phase mercury released from concrete processing with baghouse filter dust added cement. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 2481–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ekinci, M.; Ceylan, E.; Keleş, S.; Cağatay, H.H.; Apil, A.; Tanyıldız, B.; Uludag, G. Toxic effects of chronic mercury exposure on the retinal nerve fiber layer and macular and choroidal thickness in industrial mercury battery workers. Med. Sci. Monit. 2014, 20, 1284–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Tang, N.; Li, Y.M. Neurotoxic effects in workers of the clinical thermometer manufacture plant. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2006, 19, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bjørklund, G.; Hilt, B.; Dadar, M.; Lindh, U.; Aaseth, J. Neurotoxic effects of mercury exposure in dental personnel. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2019, 124, 568–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Eto, K. Minamata disease. Neuropathology 2000, 20, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. McGill, C.M.; Ladd, A.C.; Jacobs, M.B.; Goldwater, L.J. Mercury exposure in a chlorine plant. J. Occup. Med. 1964, 6, 335–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Piikivi, L.; Tolonen, U. EEG findings in chlor-alkali workers subjected to low long term exposure to mercury vapour. Br. J. Ind. Med. 1989, 46, 370–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Ellingsen, D.G.; Mørland, T.; Andersen, A.; Kjuus, H. Relation between exposure related indices and neurological and neurophysiological effects in workers previously exposed to mercury vapour. Br. J. Ind. Med. 1993, 50, 736–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Andersen, A.; Ellingsen, D.G.; Mørland, T.; Kjuus, H. A neurological and neurophysiological study of chloralkali workers previously exposed to mercury vapour. Acta Neurol. Scand. 1993, 88, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ellingsen, D.G.; Bast-Pettersen, R.; Efskind, J.; Thomassen, Y. Neuropsychological effects of low mercury vapor exposure in chloralkali workers. Neurotoxicology 2001, 22, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Frumkin, H.; Letz, R.; Williams, P.L.; Gerr, F.; Pierce, M.; Sanders, A.; Elon, L.; Manning, C.C.; Woods, J.S.; Hertzberg, V.S.; et al. Health effects of long-term mercury exposure among chloralkali plant workers. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2001, 39, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bast-Pettersen, R.; Ellingsen, D.G.; Efskind, J.; Jordskogen, R.; Thomassen, Y. A neurobehavioral study of chloralkali workers after the cessation of exposure to mercury vapor. Neurotoxicology 2005, 26, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wastensson, G.; Lamoureux, D.; Sällsten, G.; Beuter, A.; Barregård, L. Quantitative assessment of neuromotor function in workers with current low exposure to mercury vapor. Neurotoxicology 2008, 29, 596–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Neghab, M.; Norouzi, M.A.; Choobineh, A.; Kardaniyan, M.R.; Zadeh, J.H. Health effects associated with long-term occupational exposure of employees of a chlor-alkali plant to mercury. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2012, 18, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bagheri Hosseinabadi, M.; Khanjani, N.; Mobarake, M.D.; Shirkhanloo, H. Neuropsychological effects of long-term occupational exposure to mercury among chloralkali workers. Work 2020, 66, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. UNEP United Nations Environment Programme. Global Chemicals Outlook II. Chapter 2 Trends in production and sales of specific chemicals. In I. The Evolving Chemicals Economy: Status and Trends Relevant for Sustainability (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific/Weerayuth); UNEP: Nairobi, Kenya, 2019; pp. 20–39. Available online: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/28186/GCOII_PartI.pdf (accessed on 28 April 2020).
  33. Baker, B.; Kesler, D.; Guidotti, T. Occupational and Environmental Medicine: Public Health and Medicine in the Workplace. Am. J. Public Health 2020, 110, 636–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Apostoli, P.; Mangili, A.; Alessio, L. Significance of biological indicators of mercury exposure. Med. Lav. 2003, 94, 231–241. [Google Scholar]
  35. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Documentation of the Biological Exposure Indices. Mercury-Elemental and Inorganic, 7th ed.; ACGIH: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2007; Available online: http://www.acgih.org/forms/store/ProductFormPublic/mercury-elemental-bei-r-7th-edition-documentation (accessed on 28 April 2020).
  36. Fields, C.A.; Borak, J.; Louis, E.D. Mercury-induced motor and sensory neurotoxicity: Systematic review of workers currently exposed to mercury vapor. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2017, 47, 811–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, M.-D.; Little, J.; Gomes, J.; Cashman, N.R.; Krewski, D. Identification of risk factors associated with onset and progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurotoxicology 2017, 61, 101–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Gundacker, C.; Gencik, M.; Hengstschläger, M. The relevance of the individual genetic background for the toxicokinetics of two significant neurodevelopmental toxicants: Mercury and lead. Mutat. Res. 2010, 705, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Llop, S.; Ballester, F.; Broberg, K. Effect of Gene-Mercury Interactions on Mercury Toxicokinetics and Neurotoxicity. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2015, 2, 179–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ludolph, A.; Drory, V.; Hardiman, O.; Nakano, I.; Ravits, J.; Robberecht, W.; Shefner, J.; WFN Research Group on ALS/MND. A revision of the El Escorial criteria—2015. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Front. Degener. 2015, 16, 291–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guennoc, A.M.; Camu, W.; Corcia, P. Awaji criteria: New diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Rev. Neurol. 2013, 169, 470–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Costa, J.; Swash, M.; de Carvalho, M. Awaji criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review. Arch. Neurol. 2012, 69, 1410–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jang, J.S.; Bae, J.S. AWAJI criteria are not always superior to the previous criteria: A meta-analysis. Muscle Nerve. 2015, 51, 822–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Johnsen, B.; Pugdahl, K.; Fuglsang-Frederiksen, A.; Kollewe, K.; Paracka, L.; Dengler, R.; Camdessanché, J.; Nix, W.; Liguori, R.; Schofield, I.; et al. Diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A multicentre study of inter-rater variation and sensitivity. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2019, 130, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chiò, A.; Mazzini, L.; D’Alfonso, S.; Corrado, L.; Canosa, A.; Moglia, C.; Manera, U.; Bersano, E.; Brunetti, M.; Barberis, M.; et al. The multistep hypothesis of ALS revisited: The role of genetic mutations. Neurology 2018, 91, e635–e642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Taylor, J.P.; Brown, R.H.; Cleveland, D.W. Decoding ALS: From genes to mechanism. Nature 2016, 539, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Freischmidt, A.; Wieland, T.; Richter, B.; Ruf, W.; Schaeffer, V.; Müller, K.; Marroquin, N.; Nordin, F.; Hübers, A.; Weydt, P.; et al. Haploinsufficiency of TBK1 causes familial ALS and fronto-temporal dementia. Nat. Neurosci. 2015, 18, 631–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Borghero, G.; Pugliatti, M.; Marrosu, F.; Marrosu, M.G.; Murru, M.R.; Floris, G.; Cannas, A.; Occhineri, P.; Cau, T.B.; Loi, D.; et al. TBK1 is associated with ALS and ALS-FTD in Sardinian patients. Neurobiol. Aging 2016, 43, 180.e1–180.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Van der Zee, J.; Gijselinck, I.; Van Mossevelde, S.; Perrone, F.; Dillen, L.; Heeman, B.; Bäumer, V.; Engelborghs, S.; De Bleecker, J.; Baets, J.; et al. TBK1 Mutation Spectrum in an Extended European Patient Cohort with Frontotemporal Dementia and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Hum. Mutat. 2017, 38, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Oakes, J.A.; Davies, M.C.; Collins, M.O. TBK1: A new player in ALS linking autophagy and neuroinflammation. Mol. Brain 2017, 10, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Lattante, S.; Doronzio, P.N.; Marangi, G.; Conte, A.; Bisogni, G.; Bernardo, D.; Russo, T.; Lamberti, D.; Patrizi, S.; Apollo, F.P.; et al. Coexistence of variants in TBK1 and in other ALS-related genes elucidates an oligogenic model of pathogenesis in sporadic ALS. Neurobiol. Aging 2019, 84, 239.e9–239.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Brown, I.A. Chronic mercurialism: A cause of the clinical syndrome of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Neurol. Psychol. 1954, 72, 674–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kantarjian, A.D. A syndrome clinically resembling amyotrophic lateral sclerosis following chronic mercurialism. Neurology 1961, 11, 639–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Barber, T.E. Inorganic mercury intoxication reminiscent of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Occup. Med. 1978, 20, 667–669. [Google Scholar]
  55. Adams, C.R.; Ziegler, D.K.; Lin, J.T. Mercury intoxication simulating amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1983, 250, 642–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Basu, N.; Goodrich, J.M.; Head, J. Ecogenetics of mercury: From genetic polymorphisms and epigenetics to risk assessment and decision-making. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2014, 33, 1248–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Unoki, T.; Abiko, Y.; Toyama, T.; Uehara, T.; Tsuboi, K.; Nishida, M.; Kaji, T.; Kumagai, Y. Methylmercury, an environmental electrophile capable of activation and disruption of the Akt/CREB/Bcl-2 signal transduction pathway in SH-SY5Y cells. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Ke, T.; Gonçalves, F.M.; Gonçalves, C.L.; Dos Santos, A.A.; Rocha, J.B.T.; Farina, M.; Skalny, A.; Tsatsakis, A.M.; Bowman, A.B.; Aschner, M. Post-translational modifications in MeHg-induced neurotoxicity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2019, 1865, 2068–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wahlberg, K.; Love, T.M.; Pineda, D.; Engström, K.; Watson, G.E.; Thurston, S.W.; Yeates, A.J.; Mulhern, M.; McSorley, E.M.; Strain, J.; et al. Maternal polymorphisms in glutathione-related genes are associated with maternal mercury concentrations and early child neurodevelopment in a population with a fish-rich diet. Environ. Int. 2018, 115, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kolbinger, V.; Engström, K.; Berger, U.; Bose-O’Reilly, S. Polymorphisms in potential mercury transporter ABCC2 and neurotoxic symptoms in populations exposed to mercury vapor from goldmining. Environ. Res. 2019, 176, 108512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Llop, S.; Tran, V.; Ballester, F.; Barbone, F.; Sofianou-Katsoulis, A.; Sunyer, J.; Engström, K.; Alhamdow, A.; Love, T.M.; Watson, G.E.; et al. CYP3A genes and the association between prenatal methylmercury exposure and neurodevelopment. Environ. Int. 2017, 105, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Z.; Chen, L. High Spatiotemporal Resolution Observation of Glutathione Hydropersulfides in Living Cells and Tissue via a Two-Photon Ratiometric Fluorescent Probe. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 7812–7818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Vergilio, C.S.; Carvalho, C.E.V.; Melo, E.J.T. Mercury-induced dysfunctions in multiple organelles leading to cell death. Toxicol. In Vitro 2015, 29, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gautam, M.; Xie, E.F.; Kocak, N.; Ozdinler, P.H. Mitoautophagy: A Unique Self-Destructive Path Mitochondria of Upper Motor Neurons With TDP-43 Pathology Take, Very Early in ALS. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2019, 13, 489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Sudo, K.; Van Dao, C.; Miyamoto, A.; Shiraishi, M. Comparative analysis of in vitro neurotoxicity of methylmercury, mercury, cadmium, and hydrogen peroxide on SH-SY5Y cells. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2019, 81, 828–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Bootman, M.D.; Chehab, T.; Bultynck, G.; Parys, J.B.; Rietdorf, K. The regulation of autophagy by calcium signals: Do we have a consensus? Cell Calcium 2018, 70, 32–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Orr, S.E.; Barnes, M.C.; Joshee, L.; Uchakina, O.; McKallip, R.J.; Bridges, C.C. Potential mechanisms of cellular injury following exposure to a physiologically relevant species of inorganic mercury. Toxicol. Lett. 2019, 304, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. De Carvalho, L.P.; de Melo, E.J.T. Autophagic elimination of Trypanosoma cruzi in the presence of metals. J. Microbiol. 2019, 57, 918–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ceccatelli, S.; Daré, E.; Moors, M. Methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity and apoptosis. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2010, 188, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ho, D.T.; Russell, J.A. Mercury and motor neuron disease: Hooked on a hypothesis. Muscle Nerve. 2018, 58, 7–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pamphlett, R.; Kum Jew, S. Age-Related Uptake of Heavy Metals in Human Spinal Interneurons. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0162260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. International Commission Occupational Health (ICOH). International Code of Ethics for Occupational Health Professionals, 3rd ed.; ICOH: Monteporzio Catone (RM), Italy, 2014; Available online: http://www.icohweb.org/site/multimedia/code_of_ethics/code-of-ethics-en.pdf (accessed on 28 April 2020).
  73. Costituzione della Repubblica Italiana. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana; Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato: Roma, Italy, 1947; Volume 88, pp. 3802–3816. Available online: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/anteprima/codici/costituzione (accessed on 28 April 2020).
  74. Prince, A.E.R. Political economy, stakeholder voices, and saliency: Lessons from international policies regulating insurer use of genetic information. J. Law Biosci. 2018, 5, 461–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Suter, S.M. GINA at 10 years: The battle over “genetic information” continues in court. J. Law Biosci. 2018, 5, 495–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Marin, B.; Boumédiene, F.; Logroscino, G.; Couratier, P.; Babron, M.C.; Leutenegger, A.L.; Copetti, M.; Preux, P.-M.; Beghi, E. Variation in worldwide incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A meta-analysis. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 46, 57–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Magnavita, N.; Sabatelli, M.; Scoditti, E.; Chirico, F. Personalized Prevention in Mercury-Induced Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Case Report. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7839. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217839

AMA Style

Magnavita N, Sabatelli M, Scoditti E, Chirico F. Personalized Prevention in Mercury-Induced Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Case Report. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(21):7839. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217839

Chicago/Turabian Style

Magnavita, Nicola, Mario Sabatelli, Egeria Scoditti, and Francesco Chirico. 2020. "Personalized Prevention in Mercury-Induced Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Case Report" Applied Sciences 10, no. 21: 7839. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217839

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop