Next Article in Journal
Energy-Based Prognosis of the Remaining Useful Life of the Coating Segments in Hot Rolling Mill
Previous Article in Journal
MRU-NET: A U-Shaped Network for Retinal Vessel Segmentation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of Pump-Drive Turbine Module with Hydrostatic Bearing for Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle Application

Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials, Daejeon 34103, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(19), 6824; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10196824
Submission received: 21 August 2020 / Revised: 17 September 2020 / Accepted: 24 September 2020 / Published: 29 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Mechanical Engineering)

Abstract

:
The turbomachinery used in the sCO2 power cycle requires a high stable rotor-bearing system because they are usually designed to operate in extremely high-pressure and temperature conditions. In this paper, we present a pump-drive turbine module applying hydrostatic bearing using liquid CO2 as the lubricant for a 250 kW supercritical CO2 power cycle. This design is quite favorable because stable operation is possible due to the high stiffness and damping of the hydrostatic bearing, and the oil purity system is not necessary when using liquid CO2 as the lubricant. The pump-drive turbine module was designed to operate at 21,000 rpm with the rated power of 143 kW. The high-pressure liquid CO2 was supplied to the bearing, and the orifice restrictor was used for the flow control device. We selected the orifice diameter providing the maximum bearing stiffness and also conducted a rotordynamic performance prediction based on the designed pump-drive turbine module. The predicted Campbell diagram indicates that a wide range of operation is possible because there is no critical speed below the rated speed. In addition, an operation test was conducted for the manufactured pump-drive turbine module in the supercritical CO2 cycle test loop. During the operation, the pressurized CO2 of the 70 bar was supplied to the bearing for the lubrication and the shaft vibration was monitored. The successful operation was possible up to the rated speed and the test results showed that shaft vibration is controlled at the level of 2 μm for the entire speed range.

1. Introduction

Owing to stricter environmental regulations and energy depletion worldwide, the demand for power generation systems with higher efficiencies and reduced capital and operating cost has increased. With these aims, power cycle systems using supercritical CO2 (sCO2) have been examined as potential alternatives to conventional steam Rankine power cycle systems. In the sCO2 power generation cycle, friction losses are very low due to the small viscosity of the working fluid, and the size of the modular system can be significantly reduced because of the high density of sCO2 and the high-pressure operation characteristics. Accordingly, owing to these advantages of sCO2 power generation, numerous studies are underway, primarily in developed countries. Sandia National Lab (SNL) proposed and tested a 250 kW sCO2 Brayton cycle [1,2]; Bechtel Marine Propulsion Corporation (BMPC) also proposed a 100-kW CO2 Brayton cycle integrated system [3,4]. Echogen developed a 7.3-MW sCO2 power cycle for waste heat recovery system [5]. They used hydrostatic CO2-supported bearings for the compressor and reported approximately 3.5 MW of generated power. The Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials (KIMM) investigated a sCO2 cycle for a heat recovery system [6]. To evaluate the performance of the designed core modules, the integrated test facility is designed as a 250-kW class sCO2 recuperated Rankine cycle. These studies demonstrated the technical viability of sCO2 power generation systems.
The turbomachinery used in the sCO2 power cycle is generally designed to operate in extreme conditions of high temperature, high pressure, and high speed; consequently, the bearings and the lubrication system require high reliability and stability. Therefore, the selection of bearing type and compatible design for the required operating conditions is important for the safe operation of the sCO2 power cycle. In this manner, the development of a reliable bearing system for the sCO2 turbomachinery has been identified as the one of the major challenges.
In previous research, an appropriate bearing system can be found, from small-scale to commercial-scale systems [7]. For the sCO2 turbomachinery developed to date, oil lubrication bearings such as tilting pad bearings, of which the reliability has already been demonstrated in steam turbine generation system, have been widely adopted. Additionally, in small0scale facilities or prototype demonstration cases, various types of bearings such as magnetic bearings [8], bump type foil bearings [1], and hydrostatic bearings have been adopted. Among the aforementioned bearings, hydrostatic bearings are operated by supplying a pressurized lubricant to the bearing. Due to these operating characteristics, hydrostatic bearings can provide high stiffness and damping, which result in the precise operation of the rotating shaft and superior stability of the rotor bearing system. Owing to these advantages, hydrostatic bearings have been widely applied to many rotating machines to date and thorough investigations have been performed to investigate the bearing characteristics.
Rowe et al. outlined a procedure to optimize the design parameters of multi-recess hydrostatic bearings based on minimum power consumption; they suggested an optimal ratio of the land part to recess of 0.25 [9]. Singh et al. calculated the dynamic coefficients of capillary-compensated bearings in a pure hydrostatic operation [10]. Ghosh calculated the stiffness and damping coefficients of pure hydrostatic operation according to changes in recess pressure ratio and eccentricity [11]. He showed that there exists an optimum value of the pressure ratio at which load capacity is maximum. Rowe compared the dynamic properties caused by the hydrostatic, hydrodynamic and squeeze effects for various types of restrictors [12]. Chen et al. calculated stability threshold speeds for hybrid operation and demonstrated superior stability at a low eccentricity ratio [13]. In addition, Rhode et al. reported that the dynamic characteristics of a hydrostatic bearing can change considerably with the compressibility of the lubricant inside the recess [14]. They also analytically showed that there is a break frequency beyond which bearing stiffness increases sharply. Subsequently, Ghosh et al. extended this study [15]. They showed that the fluid compressibility in the recess affects the dynamic behavior of the hydrostatic bearing, and cross coupled stiffness and damping increase with rotating speed. As application fields for hydrostatic bearings increased, bearings operating in turbulent regions were investigated. Through numerical analysis, Heller described the static and dynamic performance of a hydrostatic bearing, considering turbulent effects [16]. Kim et al. reported the effects of changes in the physical properties of the lubricant on a cryogenic hydrostatic bearing [17]. San Andres proposed an approximate solution for the static and dynamic properties of hydrostatic bearings considering the flow inertia effect [18]. He reported that approximate solutions show good agreement with the full numerical solution and that maximum direct stiffness occurs at pressure ratio of 0.6, and that maximum direct damping is present at different pressure ratios depending on the rotor speed. By comparing critical mass, Ghosh and Satish demonstrated that a lobe bearing with offset factor of more than one can achieve a better stability than that of circular bearings [19,20]. Owing to the increasing demand for environmentally friendly fluid machines, studies regarding hydrostatic bearings using water as the lubricant have been conducted. Ren et al. theoretically investigated the performance of water-lubricated hydrostatic bearings for compressors through operating tests [21]. Subsequently, Du and Liang analyzed the dynamic performance of water-lubricated hydrostatic bearings [22].
Owing to their numerous aforementioned advantages, hydrostatic bearings are widely utilized in many rotating machines. However, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, the application of hydrostatic bearings to sCO2 turbomachinery has not been studied sufficiently. This study pertains to the development of a pump-drive turbine module for sCO2 cycle application with hydrostatic bearings using liquid CO2 as lubricant. The proposed design is unique and quite favorable because stable operation is possible due to the high stiffness and damping of the hydrostatic bearing and there is no oil contamination on the working fluid by using liquid CO2 as the lubricant. It is known that most oils dissolve well in sCO2; thus, for reliable operation of the cycle, a CO2 purity control system is necessary when using oil lubrication bearings. This paper presents a design approach for a rotor bearing system with hydrostatic bearings for sCO2 turbomachinery application. The detailed design parameters for the rotor-bearing system were provided. We performed bearing performance prediction and rotordynamic analysis of the pump-drive turbine module. In addition, to show the viability of the designed pump-drive turbine in sCO2 cycle applications, we conducted operating tests in a sCO2 test facility.

2. Pump-Drive Turbine Module Design

Figure 1 provides a schematic diagram of the pump-drive turbine module for sCO2 cycle application. As shown in the figure, the pump is driven by a drive turbine directly connected to a rotor; the rotor is supported by a set of hydrostatic bearings. During operation, high-temperature and high-pressure CO2 is supplied to drive the turbine, leading to the generation of a driving force, and thereby increasing the pressure of the liquid CO2 flowing into the pump. The pump-drive turbine module is installed in the vertical direction; the pump is assembled at the bottom, the turbine is located at the top, and two radial bearings and a thrust bearing are placed between them. The bearings supporting the rotor comprise two radial bearings and a pair of thrust bearings. Because it was installed and driven in the vertical direction, the weight of the rotating body was supported by the thrust bearings. The pump-drive turbine module was designed to operate in the KIMM 250 kW sCO2 test facility; the operating conditions are determined by cycle analysis of the simple recuperated Rankine cycle [6]. The rated speed of the pump-drive turbine was 21,000 rpm, and it was designed to generate a pump power of 143 kW at the rated speed.
Figure 2 shows a schematic diagram of a hydrostatic radial bearing for a pump-drive turbine. From a CO2 pump installed outside of the pump-drive turbine, the bearing was supplied with liquid CO2 at a pressure of 70 bar and temperature of 20 °C. The bearing discharge pressure was maintained at 60 bar. An orifice restrictor was installed as a flow control device and a recess was machined around the supply hole to enhance the bearing’s load capacity. As shown in the figure, two rows of recesses were machined in the axial direction, and 12 supply holes were created in the circumferential direction for each row. The axial recess location was selected such that the land width ratio equals 0.25. Table 1 shows the other design parameters of the radial bearing.

3. Theoretical Model

3.1. Bearing Performance Analysis

When operating the hydrostatic bearing in a steady state, the pressure of the bearing land part is calculated using the Reynolds equation, which can be expressed as shown in Equation (1).
θ ( H 3 P θ ) + Z ( H 3 P θ ) = Λ H θ
The dimensionless variables used in Equation (1) are defined in Equation (2)
θ = x R , Z = z R , P = p p a , H = h C ,   Λ = 6 μ ω p a ( R C ) 2
where C is the bearing clearance, R is the bearing radius, h is the film thickness, μ is the viscosity of the lubricant, and ω is the rotating speed of the shaft.
The boundary conditions of the Reynolds equation above are as follows
P ( θ ,   0 ) = P ( θ ,   L ) = P e P ( θ ,   z ) = P ( 2 π + θ ,   z ) P = P r     a t   r e c e s s
where Pe is the dimensionless pressure outside of the bearing and Pr is the dimensionless recess pressure. The dimensionless recess pressure Pr is calculated using the flow continuity relationship between the dimensionless supply pressure Ps and the orifice restrictor, as follows
L i ( Λ H i H 3 P ) d l = Γ t [ 2 ( P s P r ) ] 1 / 2
The dimensionless flow coefficient is defined as follows
Γ t = 12 μ C 3 p a C d A o p a ρ
Bearing performance analysis was conducted based on the governing equation above, and the bearing stiffness and damping were calculated using the governing equation derived, using the perturbation method from Equation (1) [21,22]. The finite element method was used to conduct a numerical analysis, and 120 × 60 grids were used in the circumferential and axial directions.

3.2. Rotordynamic Analysis

Figure 3 presents a rotor dynamics analysis model for predicting the vibration characteristics of a pump-drive turbine. The pump-drive turbine can be considered an anisotropic rotor system that consists of a symmetric rotor and anisotropic stator. The equation of the motion of the anisotropic rotor system can be written as
[ M ] q ¨ ( t ) + [ C ] q ˙ ( t ) + [ K ] q ( t ) = f ( t )
where [M], [C] and [K] denote generalized mass, damping, and stiffness matrix, and each component of the matrix can be derived by finite element method. In this study, the rotor was modeled using Euler–Bernoulli beam elements, whereas the pump, turbine impeller, and thrust collar were modeled using the equivalent inertia. In the analytical model, each node had two translational degrees of freedom and two rotational degrees of freedom. The stiffness and damping of bearing were calculated based on the aforementioned bearing performance analytical theory.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Validation of Theoretical Model

To validate the hydrostatic bearing analysis model developed in the present study, the computed results were compared with the data available in [22]. The hydrostatic bearing in [22] was a water-lubricated radial bearing with four recesses; specifications of the bearing are listed in Table 2. For other information, the same conditions as those in [22] were applied.
Figure 4 shows the predicted stiffness and damping according to changes in the rotating speed. The results in [22] and those calculated using the analysis program of the current study are presented herein. The analytical results demonstrate that the results from [22], and the calculations from the analysis program used in this study were within 5% of each other.

4.2. Determination of Orifice Diameter

To select a proper orifice diameter for a hydrostatic bearing, the bearing stiffness and the flow rate according to the recess pressure ratio were calculated. As shown in Figure 1, because the pump-drive turbine to be developed was installed and operated in the vertical direction, the shaft center operated at the concentric location of the bearing. Therefore, analysis was conducted for a case with an eccentricity of 0, and the rotating speed was the rated speed of 21,000 rpm.
Figure 5 shows the bearing stiffness and flow rate according to the recess pressure ratio. In this study, two translational degrees of freedom were considered for the rotor, and the bearing stiffness described in Figure 5a indicates the value of kxx as defined in the coordinate system shown in Figure 2. Figure 5a also shows the orifice diameter corresponding to the recess pressure ratio. The analytical results show that there is a recess pressure ratio that results in the highest stiffness. In this study, the highest stiffness was present at the recess pressure ratio of 0.6, at which the orifice diameter was 1.8 mm. In addition, as shown in Figure 5b, the flow rate increased linearly with the pressure ratio. The orifice diameter was set at 1.8 mm according to the analytical results above and the bearing flow rate was predicted to be 0.9 kg/s.

4.3. Bearing Performance Analysis

Figure 6 shows the pressure distribution of the designed radial bearing. The shaft speed was 21,000 rpm, and the eccentricity was 0. The bearing supply pressure is 70 bar, and discharge pressure is 60 bar. Under these operating conditions, the recess pressure was predicted to be 65.9 bar, and the pressure distribution in the circumferential direction was periodic around the recess. Furthermore, as shown in the figure, the highest pressure was found at the recess and the pressure decreased toward both ends in the axial direction. This indicates that, owing to the pressure difference, the CO2 lubricant supplied to the recess flowed out through both ends in the axial direction. Additionally, a high-pressure region was created in the surrounding central area with the recess where the pressure was relatively uniform; this is usually called a virtual recess.
Figure 7 shows the minimum film thickness according to the applied load to the radial bearing. As shown in the figure, the minimum film thickness decreases as the applied load increases. When a load of 2000 N was applied, the minimum film thickness was predicted to drop to 20 µm, corresponding to the eccentricity ratio of 0.5. Accordingly, the designed bearing was predicted to be able to support radial loads up to 2000 N at the rated speed.
Figure 8 shows the bearing stiffness and damping versus the rotor speed. The predicted results demonstrate that the stiffness and damping in the vertical direction (x direction in Figure 2) were identical to those in the horizontal direction (y direction in Figure 2) at all rotating speeds. Such a symmetric dynamic characteristic occurs because the rotor was operated at a concentric position. Since both the stiffness and damping in the vertical direction are identical to those in the horizontal direction, it is expected that the pump-drive turbine will have the characteristics of an isotropic rotor. In addition, when the rotating speed is low, the hydrostatic effects are dominant compared to the hydrodynamic effects, resulting in small cross-coupled stiffness. However, as the rotor speed increases, cross-coupled stiffness increases almost linearly. The damping coefficients were almost identical for all rotor speeds and the cross-coupled terms of damping were predicted to be trivial compared to the direct terms.

4.4. Rotordynamic Analysis

Figure 9 shows a Campbell diagram and the damping ratio calculated from the rotordynamic analysis. In Figure 9a, the mode shapes corresponding to the damped natural frequencies are also shown. All modes shown in Figure 9a were rigid body mode. The conical mode was found at the lowest natural frequency and the translational mode was found at the higher frequency. However, these values were predicted to be located at higher frequencies than the rated speed, and thus it is expected that there are no critical speeds below the rated speed of 21,000 rpm. Moreover, the analysis results showed that the first critical speed was at 27,000 rpm, and thus the separation margin between the rated speed and the first critical speed is more than 20%. These results indicate that a large vibration will not occur at the rated speed. In addition, as shown in Figure 9b, the damping ratios of all rigid body modes are larger than 0.1, and thus unstable vibrations will not occur. This phenomenon results from the designed hydrostatic bearing’s large stiffness of ~1 × 108 N/m and its large damping of ~2 × 104 Ns/m, as shown in Figure 8. Therefore, it is expected that the designed pump-drive turbine can be stably operated at any speed below the rated speed, indicating a large operation speed range. This rotordynamic characteristic is favorable for the pump-drive turbine operation because a large operation range is possible depending on the cycle condition.
Figure 10 shows the predicted unbalance response of the pump-drive turbine rotor. In the figure, the shaft vibrations at the two radial bearings are presented and the vibration amplitudes in the vertical and horizontal direction (x and y directions in Figure 2) are shown. For the prediction, the unbalance of the ISO G2.5 was applied at the node of turbine and pump wheels, as shown in Figure 3. The vibration amplitude in the vertical direction is the same as that in the horizontal direction at both bearing locations because of the symmetric stiffness and damping of the bearing. In addition, the vibration amplitude increases to 25,000 rpm and no critical speed is present at up to 25,000 rpm, as predicted in the Campbell diagram. Vibration amplitude at the pump side bearing is larger than that at the turbine side at all speeds; the maximum amplitude at the rated speed is predicted to be 3 μm at the pump side bearing.

4.5. Pump-Drive Turbine Operating Test

Figure 11 shows the bearings and rotor of the manufactured pump-drive turbine. The internal flow path was designed such that pressurized liquid CO2 supplied from the outside can be supplied to the radial and thrust bearings and discharged to the outside. As shown in the figure, the thrust bearing consists of six recesses; five supply holes were made in each recess. The radial and thrust bearings were made of brass and the rotor was made of STS 420. The pump and turbine impeller were attached to both sides of the rotor through a tie rod, as shown in Figure 11b. In addition, to measure the shaft vibration, proximity probes were installed vertically and horizontally near the turbine-side radial bearing. This manufactured pump-drive turbine was installed on the 250 kW sCO2 test cycle facility in KIMM, as shown in Figure 12, and an operation test was conducted. To supply pressurized liquid CO2 to the bearing, a CO2 pump was also installed in the test cycle and piping was constructed to the pump-drive turbine. The supply pressure of the liquid CO2 for the bearing is 70 bar and bearing discharge pressure is maintained at 60 bar.
In the test, high-temperature, high-pressure CO2 (84 bar, 136 °C) generated through a pump and a heater (boiler) was supplied to the drive turbine; the flow rate was adjusted through a valve to increase the rotating speed. The discharged high0temperature CO2 from the drive turbine flowed into the cooler (condenser). After flowing through the cooler, CO2 passed through the liquid separator and flowed into the pump.
Figure 13 shows the rotor vibration measured by the displacement sensor installed near the turbine side radial bearing with increase in rotating speed to the rated speed of 21,000 rpm. In the figure, waterfall diagrams of the vibration amplitude in the vertical and horizontal direction are presented. No subsynchronous vibration is found in the entire speed range, indicating that the hydrostatic bearing is operating in a stable state, as predicted in Figure 8. It was also observed that 1X synchronous vibration was dominant for the entire test speed range and no critical speed was present under the rated speed. This is consistent with the predicted rotordynamic analysis results shown in Figure 9. In addition, the measured vibration amplitude in the x-direction was similar to that in the y-direction at entire speeds, indicating that the stiffness of the manufactured bearing is symmetrical, as predicted in Figure 8.
Using unbalance response prediction, Figure 14 compares measured and predicted 1X vibration amplitude at the turbine side bearing. As can be seen in the figure, predicted rotor vibration increases with rotating speed and amplitude is around 1 μm at the rated speed. However, measured rotor vibration maintains a value of 2 μm at all rotating speeds. These test results are believed to have occurred because the rotor unbalance is relatively small, and the measured 1X vibration was mainly caused by shaft runout occurring due to a machining error in the rotor.

5. Conclusions

In this study, to design a pump-drive turbine for sCO2 cycle application, the performance of hydrostatic bearings using liquid CO2 as lubricant was analyzed and the dynamic characteristics of the rotor were predicted. To demonstrate the viability of the designed pump-drive turbine, an operating test was performed, and the rotor vibration was measured during the test. The following conclusions were obtained from this study.
  • The results predicted using the hydrostatic bearing analysis program of this study were similar to those of previous research, and the reliability of the developed analysis model was confirmed;
  • Under the design conditions, a pressure ratio existed that maximized the stiffness of the radial bearing, in consideration of which the orifice diameter was determined;
  • Based on the rotordynamic analysis, it was predicted that no critical speed would be presented below the rated speed and no instability would occur, indicating a wide range of operating speeds;
  • Tests performed on the manufactured pump-drive turbine in the sCO2 test facility confirmed that successful operation is possible for the designed sCO2 cycle, and the measured rotor vibration was 2 µm at the rated speed;
  • The test results showed that hydrostatic bearing with liquid CO2 as the lubricant can be successfully applied to the sCO2 turbomachinery.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.L., M.P. and E.Y.; methodology, B.K. and M.P.; software, D.L. and H.L.; validation, M.P., H.L. and E.Y.; formal analysis, D.L. and B.K.; writing—original draft preparation, D.L.; writing—review and editing, M.P.; project administration, E.Y.; funding acquisition, E.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation. It was also supported by the Korean Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (Project No.: 19IHTP-B151621-01-000000). The work was partially supported by National Research Council of Science and Technology (NST) grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT, Korea (Grant No. KIMM-SC1270).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

Aoorifice area
Cradial clearance
[C]damping matrix
Cdorifice discharge coefficient
Dbearing diameter
fforce vector
hfilm thickness
[K]stiffness matrix
Lbearing length
[M]mass matrix
pfilm pressure
paambient pressure
pedischarge pressure
pssupply pressure
prrecess pressure
qdisplacement vector
Rbearing radius
x, y, zCartesian coordinates
μviscosity of lubricant
ρdensity of lubricant
ωrotating speed
θcircumferential coordinate

References

  1. Conboy, T.; Wright, S.; Pasch, J.; Fleming, D.; Rochau, G.; Fuller, R. Performance characteristics of an operating supercritical CO2 brayton cycle. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2012, 134, 111703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Conboy, T.; Pasch, J.; Fleming, D. Control of a Supercritical CO2 Recompression Brayton Cycle Demonstration Loop. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2013, 135, 111710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kimball, K.J.; Clementoni, E.M. Supercritical carbon dioxide brayton power cycle development overview. In Proceedings of the Turbo Expo 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark, 11–15 June 2012. [Google Scholar]
  4. Clementoni, E.M.; Cox, T.L.; King, M.A. Steady-State power operation of a supercritical carbon dioxide brayton cycle with thermal-hydraulic control. In Proceedings of the Turbo Expo 2016, Seoul, Korea, 13–17 June 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. Avadhanula, V.K.; Held, T.J. Transient Modeling of a Supercritical CO2 power Cycle and Comparison with Test Data. In Proceedings of the Turbo Expo 2017, Charlotte, NC, USA, 26–30 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
  6. Seo, J.; Choi, W.; Lim, H.; Park, M.; Kim, D.; Lee, K.; Yoon, E. Development of a 250-kWe class supercritical carbon dioxide rankine cycle power generation system and its core components. In Proceedings of the Turbo Expo 2019, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 17–21 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sienicki, J.J.; Moisseytsev, A.; Fuller, R.L.; Wright, S.A.; Pickard, P.S. Scale dependencies of supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle technologies and the optimal size for a next-step supercritical CO2 cycle demonstration. In Proceedings of the SCO2 Power Cycle Symposium, Boulder, CO, USA, 24–25 May 2011. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kim, D.; Baik, S.; Lee, J. Investigation of magnetic journal bearing instability issues in supercritical CO2 turbomachinery. In Proceedings of the ASME-JSME-KSME 2019 Joint Fluids Engineering Conference 2019, San Francisco, CA, USA, 28 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rowe, W.B.; O’Donoghue, J.P.; Cameron, A. Optimisation of externally pressurized bearings for minimum power and low temperature. Tribol. Int. 1970, 3, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Singh, D.V.; Sinhasan, R.; Ghai, R.C. Static and dynamic analysis of capillary compensated hydrostatic journal bearings by finite element method. J. Lubr. Tech. 1977, 99, 478–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ghosh, M.K. Dynamic characteristic of multirecess externally pressurized oil journal bearing. J. Lub. Tech. 1978, 100, 467–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rowe, W.B. Dynamic and static properties of recessed hydrostatic journal bearings by small displacement analysis. J. Lub. Tech. 1980, 102, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, Y.S.; Wu, H.Y.; Xie, P.L. Stability of multirecess hybrid-operating oil journal bearings. J. Lub. Tech. 1985, 107, 116–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rhode, S.M.; Ezzat, H.A. On the dynamic behavior of hybrid journal bearings. J. Lub. Tech. 1976, 98, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ghosh, M.K.; Viswanath, N.S. Recess fluid compressibility effect on the dynamic characteristics of multirecess hydrostatic journal bearings with journal rotation. J. Tribol. 1987, 109, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Heller, S. Static and dynamic performance of externally pressurized fluid film journal bearings in the turbulent regime. J. Lub. Tech. 1974, 95, 381–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, S.; Kang, J.; Kim, K. A study on performance analysis of cryogenic hydrostatic journal bearings: The effects of turbulent flow, pressure drop and variable liquid properties. J. Korean Soc. Tribol. Lubr. Eng. 2003, 19, 139–145. [Google Scholar]
  18. San, L. Andres approximate analysis of turbulent hybrid bearings. Static and dynamic performance for centered operation. J. Tribol. 1990, 112, 692–698. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ghosh, M.K.; Satish, M.R. Rotordynamic characteristics of multilobe hybrid bearings with short sills-part I. Tribol. Int. 2003, 36, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ghosh, M.K.; Satish, M.R. Stability of multilobe hybrid bearing with short sills-part II. Tribol. Int. 2003, 36, 633–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ren, T.; Feng, M. Stability analysis of water-lubricated journal bearings for fuel cell vehicle air compressor. Tribol. Int. 2016, 95, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Du, J.; Liang, G. Dynamic coefficients and stability analysis of a water-lubricated hydrostatic bearing by solving the uncoupled Reynolds equation. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pump-drive turbine module.
Figure 1. Pump-drive turbine module.
Applsci 10 06824 g001
Figure 2. Illustration of hydrostatic radial bearing.
Figure 2. Illustration of hydrostatic radial bearing.
Applsci 10 06824 g002
Figure 3. Rotordynamic analysis model for pump-drive turbine. (C.G.: center of gravity)
Figure 3. Rotordynamic analysis model for pump-drive turbine. (C.G.: center of gravity)
Applsci 10 06824 g003
Figure 4. Stiffness and damping for hydrostatic radial bearing in [22]. (a) Stiffness; (b) Damping.
Figure 4. Stiffness and damping for hydrostatic radial bearing in [22]. (a) Stiffness; (b) Damping.
Applsci 10 06824 g004
Figure 5. Stiffness and flow rate for recess pressure ratio (ps = 70 bar, pe = 60 bar, ω = 21,000 rpm). (a) Stiffness; (b) Flow rate.
Figure 5. Stiffness and flow rate for recess pressure ratio (ps = 70 bar, pe = 60 bar, ω = 21,000 rpm). (a) Stiffness; (b) Flow rate.
Applsci 10 06824 g005
Figure 6. Pressure distribution of radial bearing (ps = 70 bar, pe = 60 bar, ω = 21,000 rpm).
Figure 6. Pressure distribution of radial bearing (ps = 70 bar, pe = 60 bar, ω = 21,000 rpm).
Applsci 10 06824 g006
Figure 7. Minimum film thickness versus applied load.
Figure 7. Minimum film thickness versus applied load.
Applsci 10 06824 g007
Figure 8. Stiffness and damping versus rotor speed. (a) Stiffness; (b) Damping.
Figure 8. Stiffness and damping versus rotor speed. (a) Stiffness; (b) Damping.
Applsci 10 06824 g008
Figure 9. Campbell diagram and damping ratio. (a) Damped natural frequency; (b) Damping ratio.
Figure 9. Campbell diagram and damping ratio. (a) Damped natural frequency; (b) Damping ratio.
Applsci 10 06824 g009
Figure 10. Predicted unbalance response at the two bearings (ISO G2.5).
Figure 10. Predicted unbalance response at the two bearings (ISO G2.5).
Applsci 10 06824 g010
Figure 11. Pump-drive turbine assembly. (a) Radial and thrust bearing; (b) Rotor and impeller.
Figure 11. Pump-drive turbine assembly. (a) Radial and thrust bearing; (b) Rotor and impeller.
Applsci 10 06824 g011
Figure 12. Test loop for pump-drive turbine. (a) Test loop for supercritical CO2 cycle; (b) Pump-drive turbine module.
Figure 12. Test loop for pump-drive turbine. (a) Test loop for supercritical CO2 cycle; (b) Pump-drive turbine module.
Applsci 10 06824 g012
Figure 13. Rotor vibration measurement results. (a) x-direction; (b) y-direction.
Figure 13. Rotor vibration measurement results. (a) x-direction; (b) y-direction.
Applsci 10 06824 g013
Figure 14. Measured and predicted rotor vibration at the turbine side bearing.
Figure 14. Measured and predicted rotor vibration at the turbine side bearing.
Applsci 10 06824 g014
Table 1. Design parameters for hydrostatic radial bearing and rotor.
Table 1. Design parameters for hydrostatic radial bearing and rotor.
PropertiesSymbolUnitValue
DiameterDmm70
LengthLmm70
Radial clearanceCmm0.04
Rotating speedωrpm21,000
Hole locationlmm17.5
Supply pressurepsbar70
Supply temperatureTsdeg20
Discharge pressurepebar60
Orifice hole diameterdmm1.8
Discharge coefficientCd-0.8
Rotor weight-kg17.8
Table 2. Design parameters of hydrostatic bearing [22].
Table 2. Design parameters of hydrostatic bearing [22].
PropertiesSymbolUnitValue
DiameterDmm20
LengthLmm14
Radial clearanceCmm0.039
Rotating speedωrpm50,000
Lubricant--Water
Densityρkg/m3998.6
ViscosityμμPas1005
Discharge coefficientCd-0.875
Supply pressurepsbar17
Recess size-mm10 × 8
Recess numbernEA4
Orifice hole diameterdmm0.64

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, D.; Kim, B.; Park, M.; Lim, H.; Yoon, E. Development of Pump-Drive Turbine Module with Hydrostatic Bearing for Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle Application. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6824. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10196824

AMA Style

Lee D, Kim B, Park M, Lim H, Yoon E. Development of Pump-Drive Turbine Module with Hydrostatic Bearing for Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle Application. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(19):6824. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10196824

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Donghyun, Byungock Kim, Mooryong Park, Hyungsoo Lim, and Euisoo Yoon. 2020. "Development of Pump-Drive Turbine Module with Hydrostatic Bearing for Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle Application" Applied Sciences 10, no. 19: 6824. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10196824

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop