Next Article in Journal
Can Natural Speech Prosody Distinguish Autism Spectrum Disorders? A Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Trends and Challenges in the Mental Health of University Students with Disabilities: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Not All Levels of Social Re-Inclusion Allow for Recovery from Negative Outcomes of Social Exclusion: The Moderating Role of Self-Esteem
Previous Article in Special Issue
Predicting Risk of Bullying Victimization among Primary and Secondary School Students: Based on a Machine Learning Model
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Mental Health Disparities among Pre-Clinical Medical Students at Saint Louis University during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(2), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14020089
by Won Jong Chwa 1, Albert C. Chong 2, Sheryl Lin 2, Erin H. Su 2, Chantal Sheridan 2, Jacob Schreiber 2, Stephanie K. Zia 2 and Keniesha Thompson 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(2), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14020089
Submission received: 13 November 2023 / Revised: 13 January 2024 / Accepted: 24 January 2024 / Published: 26 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wellbeing and Mental Health among Students)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This is a thorough analysis of GAD and MDD outcomes in a convenience sample from a single midwestern medical school. The authors are interested in whether URM students reported worse outcomes on these scales during the Covid pandemic. If so, they are interested in what factors beyond URM status correlate with those outcomes and what sources of concern students report.

Since the sample is small, particularly the subsample of interest (N=11), there is little additional analysis that is likely to yield useful insights. However, I’d suggest the authors explore severe MDD or GAD outcomes as separate from “any” depression or anxiety. This simply means defining a higher cutoff for these diagnoses and performing the analysis in Figure 1 and Table 2 using this additional definition. This would supplement, not replace, the Figure 1/Table 2 analysis.

The authors may then want to explore whether there are predictors (correlates) of high cut-off diagnoses (risk) or whether associated concerns differ when a higher threshold is used.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. The content will be of great interest to educators and medical staff involved in teaching. In order to improve the script the following is suggested:

Under the methodology section there needs to be some discussion on research design and ethical considerations that is who granted ethical permission for this study and was a gatekeeper used for example to distribute the questionnaire used. What informed the design of the questionnaire? 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop