Next Article in Journal
Effects of Dietary Sodium Nitroprusside and NG-Nitro-L-Arginine Methyl Ester on Growth Performance, Some Organs Development Status and Immune Parameters in Broilers
Next Article in Special Issue
Cryopreservation and Transfer of Sheep Embryos Recovered at Different Stages of Development and Cryopreserved Using Different Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
High Levels of Heavy Metal(loid)s Related to Biliary Hyperplasia in Hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Meiotic Development of Canine Oocytes from Poly-Ovular and Mono-Ovular Follicles after In Vitro Maturation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 8
10.3390/ani13081360
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Postmortem Collection of Gametes for the Conservation of Endangered Mammals: A Review of the Current State-of-the-Art

by
Tim E. R. G. Huijsmans
*,
Hiba Ali Hassan
,
Katrien Smits
and
Ann Van Soom
Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction, and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(8), 1360; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081360
Submission received: 28 February 2023 / Revised: 3 April 2023 / Accepted: 12 April 2023 / Published: 15 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selection and Conservation of Gametes and Embryos for Improving Assisted Reproductive Technologies)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Many species are threatened with extinction. A consequence of the decreasing population sizes is the loss of genetic diversity. To maintain this genetic diversity, establishing genetic resource banks can be part of the solution. These banks contain, amongst others, sperm and oocytes, which can be used to produce offspring through artificial reproduction techniques. Deceased animals can be an important source for the collection of these gametes, without having a negative effect on living animals. To transport, collect, and store gametes of wildlife correctly, gametes of domestic animals can possibly be used to examine the ideal procedures. To date, sperm has been collected after death from at least 28 wildlife species and oocytes have been collected from at least 10 wildlife species of the Equidae, Bovidae, and Felidae families. Using these postmortem collected gametes, offspring have been produced in two wildlife species, both belonging to the Bovidae. This shows that gametes recovered postmortem can indeed be a valuable resource for the conservation of endangered species.

Abstract

The collection of gametes from recently deceased domestic and wildlife mammals has been well documented in the literature. Through the utilization of gametes recovered postmortem, scientists have successfully produced embryos in 10 different wildlife species, while in 2 of those, offspring have also been born. Thus, the collection of gametes from recently deceased animals represents a valuable opportunity to increase genetic resource banks, obviating the requirement for invasive procedures. Despite the development of several protocols for gamete collection, the refinement of these techniques and the establishment of species–specific protocols are still required, taking into account both the limitations and the opportunities. In the case of wildlife, the optimization of such protocols is impeded by the scarcity of available animals, many of which have a high genetic value that must be protected rather than utilized for research purposes. Therefore, optimizing protocols for wildlife species by using domestic species as a model is crucial. In this review, we focused on the current advancements in the collection, preservation, and utilization of gametes, postmortem, in selected species belonging to Equidae, Bovidae, and Felidae, both domestic and wildlife.

1. Introduction

The rapid increase in the number of endangered species is a matter of great concern. Data from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species indicates that 27% of the 5969 mammal species evaluated are facing extinction [1]. The current rate of extinction is estimated to be 1000 times the normal rate of extinction [2]. The primary threats for endangered mammals are deforestation, habitat loss, human–wildlife conflicts, hunting, and global warming, all of which contribute to biodiversity loss, the decline of populations, and a loss of genetic diversity [3]. The application of artificial reproduction technologies (ARTs) can serve as a solution to protect species from extinction. In particular, ARTs can be an indispensable tool in the conservation of endangered mammals, especially in small populations. These technologies allow for the exchange of genetic material without the need for natural breeding, enabling genetic transfer both within and between captive and free-ranging populations, thus, providing a synergistic approach to both in situ and ex situ conservation [4]. The application of ARTs in wildlife conservation eliminates the requirement for transporting animals for natural mating and acclimatization to new environments, which can cause significant stress with no guarantee of reproductive success. To make this possible, biobanks have been established across the world in zoological gardens and research institutions, such as the Frozen Zoo and the EAZA biobank [5,6]. Due to the large number of endangered species, a global prioritization system for the cryopreservation of species is required to optimize the benefits of biobanks [7]. Furthermore, ARTs eliminate the need to remove an individual from the wild to increase genetic diversity in zoos. To prevent any abuse, the Nagoya protocol, a new treaty that obliges, amongst others, researchers to negotiate binding agreements between the sending and receiving countries of gametes, is in place. The downside of this protocol is that it makes the exchange of gametes more difficult [8]. In addition, there are still challenges that make the implementation of ARTs in breeding programs for most species difficult. A lack of knowledge on species–specific reproduction traits, the low availability of studies on animals, and the difficulties in the preservation of gametes, all cause the success rates of ARTs in endangered animals to be low [9,10].
The implementation of ARTs generally requires the collection of gametes, i.e., oocytes and spermatozoa. These gametes can be obtained from both living and deceased animals [11]. The collection of samples from deceased animals does not require any interventions, e.g., electroejaculation or ovum pick-up, in the living population, making it a promising approach. To obtain functional gametes from deceased animals, several factors must be considered, including the timeframe for the postmortem, whereby samples can be collected, the effect of storage techniques on the quality of the samples, and the most appropriate ART for successful fertilization. Especially in endangered species, which often live in small populations, the quality of the gametes is already impaired, making the decrease in quality postmortem even more detrimental. A recent meta-analysis showed that genetic resource banking for the preservation of vital tissues of wildlife is feasible, especially with vitrification as a financially interesting and easily applied technique [12].
The aim of this review is to highlight the current advancements in the collection, preservation, and utilization of gametes postmortem. This review will focus on selected species from the families of Equidae, Bovidae, and Felidae in both domestic and wildlife animals and will assess the feasibility of using domestic species as a model for their wildlife counterparts. We hypothesize that collection and freezing techniques will most probably be applicable in species that are closely related to domestic animals, where backcrossing is possible and will result in viable, if not fertile, offspring. Papers reporting on the birth of hybrid offspring between horses, cattle, and domestic cats and their wildlife counterparts are summarized in Table 1. The wildlife species listed in this table are, therefore, interesting candidate species for gamete collection and preservation.

2. Methods

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database, focusing exclusively on studies that addressed the use of postmortem collected sperm and oocytes from species within the families of Equidae, Bovidae, and Felidae. The search was not limited by the year of publication and all relevant papers were included up to February 2023. A broad combination of search terms related to wildlife ARTs and the collection of gametes postmortem was used. The search yielded a total of 23 relevant articles on the postmortem collection of sperm and oocytes from wildlife animals of the Equidae, Bovidae, and Felidae families.

3. Male Gametes

3.1. Anatomy

The testes of many mammals are located in the scrotum, along with their epididymis and distal spermatic cord (scrotal mammals). Exceptions to this concept are ascrotal mammals (such as seals and dolphins) and testicond mammals (such as elephants and the elephant shrew) [27]. The orientation of the testes varies among species, with the testes in horses positioned horizontally, those in cattle positioned vertically, and those in domestic cats positioned dorsocaudally. The testis consists of convoluted seminiferous tubules and spermatozoa travel from the testis through the ductuli efferentes to the epididymis, where they are stored until ejaculation. The epididymis, which is a long tightly coiled tube, is connected across the craniolateral aspect of the testis [28]. A key difference between species is the size of the epididymis (Table 2), which plays a crucial role in determining the feasibility of various postmortem sperm collection techniques. In addition to a difference in epididymal weight, there is a variation in the length of the ductus epididymis, with the ductus ranging from 70 to 90 m in horses, and from 40 to 50 m in cattle [29,30,31,32].

3.2. Handling and Transport of the Testes and Epididymides

When an animal has passed away, the retrieval of the testicles with the epididymis can be performed as part of a standard castration procedure. Sperm viability in relation to the storage and transportation time of the testes and epididymis has been studied in various species, such as goats, cattle, deer, and horses, thus, enabling the definition of the best methods for transporting the material to the storage facility [38,42,43,44]. A certain decrease in sperm quality and viability with increasing storage time has been well documented in Cantabric chamois [45]. This decline can be attributed to both the metabolic depletion of the sperm and the degeneration of tissue postmortem. The degenerating tissues and/or altered body fluids might pose an (epi)genetic risk to exposed sperm and prospective offspring, although these possible effects have not been assessed in mammals yet [46]. Sperm viability can be preserved for an extended period of time in horses by cooling the male reproductive organs to lower temperatures (preferably around 4 °C). This method slows down the degeneration process and reduces sperm metabolism [44].
The testicles, along with the epididymis, are usually transported in a sterile saline solution that may be supplemented with antibiotics, such as penicillin–streptomycin, to prevent bacterial growth [47]. While a temperature range of 4 °C to 5 °C is generally recommended for the transportation of testicular tissue [47], some studies, in cattle and gazelle species, have found that transportation at 18 °C to 20 °C, although for a limited time (up to 30 h), can still be effective [48,49]. However, a recent study on the impact of transportation time on the quality of epididymal spermatozoa in rams showed that transport at ambient temperatures resulted in decreased sperm motility and viability compared to transport at refrigeration temperatures. After 72 h of preservation at 17.9 to 21.5 °C, sperm motility dropped from 75 ± 2.58% to 45.83 ± 2.01% [50]. The storage of the testicles at 5 °C for 24 h has been shown to have no significant effect on sperm quality. However, after 48 h, a significant adverse effect was visible [38,39,49,51].

3.3. Collection Methods and Sperm Quality

Postmortem spermatozoa can be collected in vitro from the testes or epididymis. Different techniques are used for this, which are categorized based on either the source of sperm retrieval (testes or epididymis) or the method employed (mincing or aspiration). These methods have their own specific benefits and drawbacks.
In the species under consideration in this review, the collection of sperm postmortem was primarily achieved through three distinct methodologies: epididymal mincing, testicular mincing, and epididymal retrograde flushing [47,52,53]. Both mincing techniques involve either the isolation of the tissue, i.e., the cauda of the epididymis or the testis, respectively, followed by cleaning and mincing in a prewarmed extender solution. To enable the spermatozoa to swim up into the solution, the minced tissue is incubated for a designated time period. Despite filtering, the resulting spermatozoa suspension may still contain contaminants such as epithelial cells, erythrocytes, and bacteria [47,54,55]. For the retrograde flushing procedure, a fine-gauge needle attached to a tuberculin syringe containing fluid is introduced through the vas deferens to the cauda epididymis. Then, the plunger of the syringe is pulled to create negative pressure, and the needle tip is gently moved in and out within the epididymis until a clear fluid is obtained in the syringe [56]. The downside of spermatozoa collected postmortem compared to those collected at ejaculation is the lack of seminal fluid. Seminal fluid plays a species-specific role and might have a role in fertilization in a few species, while it provides some protection during freezing as well [57].
Both methods of epididymal sperm collection have been described in Equidae, Bovidae, and Felidae families, although retrograde flushing is generally preferred for horses and cattle due to the relative ease of catheterization of the ductus [58,59,60]. Therefore, the choice of sperm retrieval technique mainly depends on the species.

3.3.1. Equidae

The retrograde flushing technique is considered a standard technique for the collection of epididymal spermatozoa in the Equids family. This method is characterized by its high efficiency and minimal contamination with blood [34]. The average epididymal sperm concentration after retrograde flushing in horses has been reported to be 6.5 ± 0.4 × 109 spermatozoa/mL [61]. Sperm has been collected postmortem in one wildlife species, the plains zebra (Equus quagga), resulting in successful heterologous embryo production after ICSI with frozen-thawed epididymal semen [62,63]. Live horse foals have been born after the insemination of epididymal sperm collected post-castration via retrograde flushing [64,65]. These findings indicate the potential of semen collected postmortem from valuable wildlife for ART and genome resource banking.

3.3.2. Bovidae

In the Bovidae family, the postmortem collection of sperm has been conducted in 21 wildlife species. Epididymal mincing is the most commonly used method, producing a mean sperm concentration of 3.85 × 1010 spermatozoa/mL in cattle [66]. Despite being used less frequently, retrograde flushing is considered the preferred method for cattle semen collection [58]. Results from artificial insemination in cattle indicate comparable pregnancy rates for frozen-thawed epididymal sperm collected via retrograde flushing (63.6%) and ejaculated semen (60.0%) [67].

3.3.3. Felidae

Testicular and epididymal spermatozoa collection has been performed postmortem by testicular and epididymal mincing in six wildlife species (Table 3). The collection of epididymal sperm through epididymal mincing has a similar fertilization capacity in vitro compared to semen collected via urethral catheterization in living animals, making epididymal spermatozoa collected postmortem a valuable genetic resource for conservation [68]. The average epididymal sperm concentration retrieved by squeezing cauda and vasa deferentia was found to be 148.9 ± 102.8 × 106 spermatozoa/mL in domestic cats [69], 2930 × 106 spermatozoa/mL in lions [70], and 5.7 ± 1.1 × 106 spermatozoa/mL in jaguars [71].

4. Female Gametes

4.1. Anatomy of the Ovaries

The ovaries are paired female gonads that play a crucial role in the development and maturation of oocytes, also known as germ cells. These organs possess both exocrine and endocrine functions and are responsible for nurturing and preparing the oocytes for ovulation [86,87]. The morphology of the ovaries varies among species, with a bean shape in horses, an oval-to-bean shape in cattle, and an oval shape in domestic cats. Ovaries are composed of the cortex and medulla. The cortex is the outer layer of the ovary and holds all the follicles, while the medulla is the inner layer and contains nerves and blood vessels. In horses, this anatomical arrangement is reversed, with the cortical tissue located exclusively on the outside of the ovulatory fossa, where ovulation occurs. The ovaries are encased by the bursa ovarica, which is formed by the mesovarium and mesosalpinx. In cattle, the ovaries are positioned along the cranial border of the broad ligament and lie parallel to the uterine horns and cervix over the pelvic floor, whereas in older cattle and during pregnancy, they are found in the abdomen. The right ovary is typically larger and more active in cattle, whereas in horses and domestic cats, the ovaries are located near the caudal region of the kidneys, with the left ovary being slightly larger in domestic cats [88,89].

4.2. Collection Method

It is recommended to store ovaries in a saline solution containing antibiotics during their transport to the laboratory [90]. If cat oocyte collection occurs within six hours, the ovaries can be stored at room temperature without affecting the developmental competence of the oocytes [91]. Oocytes can be harvested from the ovaries using various techniques, such as aspiration, cutting, or sieving. During aspiration, a needle is used to puncture the follicle, and the follicular fluid is drawn out [92]. The cutting method involves using a scalpel blade to make cuts over the entire surface of the ovary. The follicular wall is sometimes scraped using a curette under a stereomicroscope, causing the oocytes to fall into the culture medium for further processing [81]. The sieving method involves removing the medulla from the ovaries followed by pressing the cortices through a cell dissociation sieve. The cell solution is then passed through a series of sieves with decreasing mesh sizes, and the oocytes are recovered [84]. For routine IVF in domestic animals, ovaries are mostly collected after slaughter in cattle and horses, and after gonadectomy in cats.
Postmortem oocyte collection has been conducted using three methods, with the cutting method being preferred for horses and aspiration for cattle [93,94]. Meanwhile, both cutting and sieving methods have been used for oocyte collection in Felidae [84,95]. Therefore, the choice of method is species-dependent.

4.2.1. Equidae

So far, only domestic species of Equidae have had their oocytes collected. A study in 1997 compared the different collection methods in horses and showed that the aspiration method had a low success rate, with only 31.2% recovery, compared to the cutting method with scraping, which had a higher recovery rate of 71.1% [93]. A more recent study showed a recovery rate after aspiration of 65.5% to 66.5% depending on the needle caliber [96]. As a result, cutting is preferred, where the follicle is opened with a scalpel blade, and the granulosa layer is scraped with a curette [93,97,98]. Additionally, equine oocytes can be stored overnight in a holding medium at room temperature without affecting developmental competence [99]. A study comparing the storage of oocytes in embryo holding medium at 4 °C and room temperature found higher rates of in vitro maturation, cleavage, and blastocyst formation at room temperature [100].

4.2.2. Bovidae

The collection of oocytes has been conducted in three wildlife species from the Bovidae family. In cattle, the aspiration method is used to collect oocytes from the follicle and the postmortem collection of oocytes from slaughterhouse oocytes is routinely performed in bovine IVF research, yielding blastocyst rates of 30–40%. A comparison between calves and adult cattle showed that, in the case of smaller follicles, adult cattle have a higher percentage of morulae and blastocysts at day 9 after fertilization compared to calves. However, for large follicles, there is no significant difference between calves and adult cattle [94]. In terms of cleavage rate, larger follicles lead to higher rates of morulae and blastocysts in both calves and adult cattle. Our group also demonstrated that after aspiration, holding oocytes in the medium for both 6 and 10 h at room temperature did not affect the maturation rates (83.2 ± 2.9% and 78.9 ± 3.2%, respectively) nor day 8 blastocyst rates [101]. The presence of dominant follicles and corpus luteum on the ovary will also decrease the developmental quality of the collected oocytes [102], although this finding is less important in deceased animals of high genetic value, since in this case all the collected oocytes are valuable, regardless of the state of the ovary.
In sheep, the proportion of high-quality oocytes is higher in large and medium-sized oocytes compared to small oocytes [92]. These findings suggest that the size of the follicles can play a crucial role in the collection of oocytes in various species and highlight the potential value of collecting gametes from juvenile animals postmortem.

4.2.3. Felidae

Oocytes have been collected in seven wildlife felid species postmortem (Table 4). The cycle stage has a noticeable effect on the developmental competence of oocytes after in vitro maturation (IVM) or in vitro fertilization (IVF). In a study of ovariohysterectomized domestic cats, the percentage of embryos that developed into blastocysts was 38.1% for females with inactive ovaries, 20.6% for females with ovaries in the follicular phase, and 36.3% for females with ovaries in the luteal phase [103]. This influence on developmental competence is likely to apply to postmortem collected oocytes as well, depending on the stage the female was in at the time of their death. This should be considered when comparing different collection methods.

5. Artificial Reproduction Techniques (ARTs)

5.1. Artificial Insemination

Artificial insemination (AI) is a commonly used ART in endangered mammals [107,108]. It offers the possibility of depositing the collected sperm into various sites of the reproductive tract, such as the vagina, cervix, or in certain cases, the uterus. Intrauterine insemination requires a lower sperm dose compared to intravaginal insemination, making the preservation of sperm in a genetic resource bank more efficient [109]. Another option is laparoscopic AI, which involves inserting sperm into the uterine lumen or oviductal ostium via laparoscopy [110]. This approach has been shown to increase pregnancy rates and conserve sperm in endangered non-domestic cat species [111]. As a result, laparoscopic AI may be a preferred option over conventional AI for sperm collected postmortem. AI has been employed in feline, bovine, and equine species, and the success rates of achieving pregnancy have varied between these species. The average pregnancy rates per cycle after AI with frozen-thawed sperm in horses are 30% to 40% [112]. Intrauterine AI in cattle results in an average conception rate of 54.7% [113]. A slightly higher conception rate, around 57%, has been achieved in domestic cats after intrauterine insemination with frozen-thawed sperm [114].

5.2. In Vitro Embryo Production

The procedure involves the collection of spermatozoa and oocytes, IVM of the oocytes, IVF, or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), followed by in vitro culture (IVC) of the embryos, followed by embryo transfer to a synchronized recipient or cryopreservation of the resulting embryo until further use [115,116,117].
Although only a small number of oocytes present in the ovaries at birth are eventually ovulated over the lifetime of a female mammal, immature oocytes can be collected and subjected to IVM. Immature oocytes collected postmortem can still represent a valuable additional source of genetic material. In horses, the blastocyst rates using immature oocytes vary between 35% and 44% [118]. The blastocyst rate using immature cattle oocytes is 37.4 ± 3.3% [119]. The lowest blastocyst rate using immature oocytes, 10.7%, was obtained in the domestic cat [120]. Other research showed that the blastocyst rates in domestic cats for in vitro matured oocytes after ICSI (19%) and IVF (42%) were lower compared to in vivo matured oocytes after ICSI (30%) and IVF (48%) [121]. While ICSI achieved a success rate of 33% using in vitro matured oocytes in equine, it recorded a higher success rate of 41% from in vivo matured oocytes [122].
ICSI is a routinely used artificial reproduction technique in horses [123]. IVF was successful in horses for the first time in 1990, although it was not efficient for a long time [124]. Only recently, a repeatable standard procedure for IVF has been established [125]. In horses, successful IVF has been achieved with a sperm concentration of 1 × 106 spermatozoa/mL [125], while for IVF in cattle, the sperm concentration ranges from 0.5 × 106 to 2 × 106 spermatozoa/mL [126]. In domestic cats, a sperm concentration of 1.5 × 106 to 2.5 × 106 spermatozoa/mL is typically utilized [127]. ICSI offers the advantage of direct injection of a single spermatozoon into the cytoplasm of a mature oocyte using micromanipulation, thereby eliminating the requirement for high-quality and high-quantity sperm [128,129]. This feature also enables the use of sperm from dead animals [130]. In horses, ICSI has shown greater success rates compared to IVF, and is, therefore, the preferred method [131]. The blastocyst rates after the in vitro embryo production (IVP) in horses following ovum pick up and ICSI were 19.0 ± 1.4% [132]. The blastocyst rates after ICSI in cattle were 37% and 26% for young (30 to 50 months) and aged (>120 months) cattle, respectively, compared to 67% and 50% after IVF in the same age groups, respectively [133]. In domestic cats, blastocyst rates after ICSI and IVF using in vivo matured oocytes were 43% and 53%, respectively [134]. Epididymal sperm with ICSI has resulted in a blastocyst rate of 21.9% in domestic cats [135].
An overview of the use of postmortem collected sperm and oocytes to achieve fertilization is displayed in Table 5.

6. Conclusions

The collection of gametes postmortem, including sperm and oocytes, has been demonstrated to be feasible in several domestic and wildlife species in the Equidae, Bovidae, and Felidae families. For the Equidae family, sperm have been collected postmortem in one wildlife species, the plains zebra. In terms of postmortem oocyte collection, this has only been accomplished in the domestic horse. In the Bovidae family, successful postmortem sperm collection has been reported in 21 wildlife species, while postmortem oocyte collection has been achieved in 3 wildlife species, with the production of offspring being reported in 2 species: the American and European bison. In the Felidae family, successful postmortem sperm collection has been reported in six species, with postmortem oocyte collection having been accomplished in seven species. Further postmortem collected gametes might be preserved in biobanks across the world.
The production of embryos using at least one gamete collected postmortem has been demonstrated using techniques such as IVF, ICSI, and AI. The utilization of domestic animals as a source of knowledge to develop protocols for the collection, transportation, and storage of gametes postmortem can serve as a valuable resource in the conservation of endangered wildlife species. Although artificial reproduction techniques are not standardized procedures in most wildlife breeding programs, they have played an important role in the conservation of some species. In elephants (Loxodonta africana and Elephas maximus), giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca), and black-footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes) AI is regularly used, and it has played an important role in conservation efforts [136,137,138]. A recent study showed that the inclusion of ARTs and biobanking in the captive management of koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) would be feasible and beneficial for genetic diversity [139]. For the Asiatic golden cat (Catopuma temmincki), ARTs are the only hope to maintain the captive European population, with only a few females left, as natural mating is almost impossible due to the overaggressive behavior of the males. An AI in this species already resulted in the birth of a healthy twin [140]. In addition, the widespread research and successes in domestic animals have shown that establishing successful protocols is possible.
As the postmortem collection procedure is noninvasive, it allows researchers to establish and optimize collection, transportation, preservation, maturation, and fertilization techniques without the involvement of any living animals. Therefore, they have no negative impact on animal welfare and carry no risk for both humans and animals. In addition, the use of postmortem collected gametes for research is more cost-effective. Unfortunately, the infield application of gametes collected postmortem is limited due to the decrease in quality of the gametes over time, which results in lower blastocyst rates compared to gametes derived from living animals [62,141].
To turn the use of postmortem collected gametes into a reproductive success, knowledge gaps in reproductive biology need to be addressed. Collection and preservation methods need to be optimized to allow us to work with good-quality gametes, which result in higher chances of fertilization, and better-quality embryos. The right timing of AI and embryo transfer is key and requires knowledge of the monitoring of the cycle or strategies to synchronize the recipient. Opportunities for the extrapolation of knowledge between species need to be investigated as the diversity in reproductive biology might jeopardize the extrapolation of data between species. By addressing these challenges, ARTs can be part of the solution to protect species from extinction, with postmortem collected gametes as part of the resources that can be used. Therefore, the collection of gametes postmortem can play a substantial role in addressing the loss of genetic diversity and preserving genetic resources.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.E.R.G.H. and H.A.H.; investigation, T.E.R.G.H.; data curation, T.E.R.G.H. and H.A.H.; writing—original draft preparation, T.E.R.G.H. and H.A.H.; writing—review and editing, A.V.S. and K.S.; visualization, T.E.R.G.H., H.A.H., K.S. and A.V.S.; supervision, A.V.S. and K.S.; project administration, T.E.R.G.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to Jella Wauters for advising us on this topic and for proofreading our manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. IUCN. Red List Summary Statistics; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pimm, S.L.; Jenkins, C.N.; Abell, R.; Brooks, T.M.; Gittleman, J.L.; Joppa, L.N.; Raven, P.H.; Roberts, C.M.; Sexton, J.O. The Biodiversity of Species and Their Rates of Extinction, Distribution, and Protection. Science 2014, 344, 6187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ceballos, G.; Ehrlich, P.R.; Raven, P.H. Vertebrates on the Brink as Indicators of Biological Annihilation and the Sixth Mass Extinction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 13596–13602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shen, F.; Zhang, Z.; He, W.; Yue, B.; Zhang, A.; Zhang, L.; Hou, R.; Wang, C.; Watanabe, T. Microsatellite Variability Reveals the Necessity for Genetic Input from Wild Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) into the Captive Population. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18, 1061–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance Frozen Zoo®. Available online: https://science.sandiegozoo.org/resources/frozen-zoo%C2%AE (accessed on 3 April 2023).
  6. EAZA. Vision Document for the EAZA Biobank; EAZA: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bolton, R.L.; Mooney, A.; Pettit, M.T.; Bolton, A.E.; Morgan, L.; Drake, G.J.; Appeltant, R.; Walker, S.L.; Gillis, J.D.; Hvilsom, C. Resurrecting Biodiversity: Advanced Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Biobanking. Reprod. Fertil. 2022, 3, R121–R146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Holt, W.V.; Comizzoli, P. Genome Resource Banking for Wildlife Conservation: Promises and Caveats. Cryo Lett. 2021, 42, 309–320. [Google Scholar]
  9. Swanson, W.F. The Challenge of Assisted Reproduction for Conservation of Wild Felids–A Reality Check. Theriogenology 2023, 197, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rodger, J.C.; Clulow, J. Resetting the Paradigm of Reproductive Science and Conservation. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2022, 246, 106911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Leon-Quinto, T.; Simon, M.A.; Cadenas, R.; Jones, J.; Martinez-Hernandez, F.J.; Moreno, J.M.; Vargas, A.; Martinez, F.; Soria, B. Developing Biological Resource Banks as a Supporting Tool for Wildlife Reproduction and Conservation. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2009, 112, 347–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bhat, G.R.; Sofi, K.A. Oocyte and Embryo Preservation in Wild Animals: An Update. Cryo Lett. 2021, 42, 251–260. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hrabar, H.; Kerley, G.I.H. Conservation Goals for the Cape Mountain Zebra Equus Zebra Zebra—Security in Numbers? Oryx 2013, 47, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Breen, M.; Gill, J.J.B. The Chromosomes of Two Horse × Zebra Hybrids; E. Caballus × E. Grevyi and E. Burchelli. Hereditas 1991, 115, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Rong, R.; Yang, X.; Cai, H.; Wei, J. Fertile Mule in China and Her Unusual Foal. J. R. Soc. Med. 1985, 78, 821–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Chandley, A.C.; Short, R.V.; Allen, W.R. Cytogenetic Studies of Three Equine Hybrids. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 1975, 356–370. [Google Scholar]
  17. Boyd, M.M. A Short Account of an Experiment in Crossing the American Bison with Domestic Cattle. J. Hered. 1908, 4, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Krasińska, M. Bisoniana XXXIX. The Postnatal Development of F1 Hybrids of the European Bison and Domestic Cattle. Acta Theriol. 1969, 14, 69–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. National Research Council. Little-Known Asian Animals with a Promising Economic Future; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wood, S. LIOC Endangered Species Conservation Federation Newsletter. Felid Conserv. 1986, 30, 15. [Google Scholar]
  21. Weir, H. Our Cats and All. about Them: Their Varieties, Habits, and Management, and for Show, the Standard of Excellence and Beauty; Tunbridge Wells: Sevenoaks, UK, 1889. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cole, F.R.; Wilson, D.E. Felis margarita (Carnivora: Felidae). Mamm. Species 2015, 47, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Dickman, C.R.; Legge, S.M.; Woinarski, J.C.Z. Assessing Risks to Wildlife from Free-Roaming Hybrid Cats: The Proposed Introduction of Pet Savannah Cats to Australia as a Case Study. Animals 2019, 9, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Bredemeyer, K.R.; Seabury, C.M.; Stickney, M.J.; McCarrey, J.R.; vonHoldt, B.M.; Murphy, W.J. Rapid Macrosatellite Evolution Promotes X-Linked Hybrid Male Sterility in a Feline Interspecies Cross. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 5588–5609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kusminych, I.; Pawlowa, A. Ein Bastard von Karakal Hauskatze Im Moskauer Zoo. Zool. Gart. 1998, 68, 4. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lyons, L.A. Genetic Testing in Domestic Cats. Mol. Cell. Probes 2012, 26, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Werdelin, L.; Nilsonne, Å. The Evolution of the Scrotum and Testicular Descent in Mammals: A Phylogenetic View. J. Theor. Biol. 1999, 196, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Testes and Scrotum|Veterian Key. Available online: https://veteriankey.com/testes-and-scrotum/ (accessed on 16 January 2023).
  29. Mohamed, A. Glycohistochemical, Immunohistochemical and Ultrastructural Studies of the Bovine Epididymis. Ph.D. Thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lodhi, L.A.; Lqbal Qureshi, Z.; Ali, F. The Bovine Testis—I: Pre and Post Natal Development. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2000, 3, 1691–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Thomas, J. Reproductive Anatomy and Physiology of the Bull. Available online: https://extension.missouri.edu/publications/g2016 (accessed on 27 March 2023).
  32. National Research Council (US) Subcommittee on Reproductive and Neurodevelopmental Toxicology. Biologic Markers of Epididymal Structure and Function; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  33. Naden, J.; Amann, R.P.; Squires, E.L. Testicular Growth, Hormone Concentrations, Seminal Characteristics and Sexual Behaviour in Stallions. Reproduction 1990, 88, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Podico, G.; Canisso, I.F. Retrograde Flushing Followed by Slicing Float-Up as an Approach to Optimize Epididymal Sperm Recovery for the Purpose of Cryopreservation in Equids. Animals 2022, 12, 1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Masoud, S.R.; Kishta, A.A.; Canisso, I.F.; Abdel-Megeid, N.S.; Fathalla, S.I.; Shawky, S.M.; Abdoon, A.S.S. Age-related Changes in Testicular Morphometry and Function in Egyptian Donkeys. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2022, 57, 1319–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Killian, G.J.; Amann, R.P. Reproductive Capacity of Dairy Bulls. IX. Changes in Reproductive Organ Weights and Semen Characteristics of Holstein Bulls During the First Thirty Weeks After Puberty. J. Dairy. Sci. 1972, 55, 1631–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Coulter, G.H.; Kozub, G.C. Testicular Development, Epididymal Sperm Reserves and Seminal Quality in Two-Year-Old Hereford and Angus Bulls: Effects of Two Levels of Dietary Energy. J. Anim. Sci. 1984, 59, 432–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kaabi, M.; Paz, P.; Alvarez, M.; Anel, E.; Boixo, J.C.; Rouissi, H.; Herraez, P.; Anel, L. Effect of Epididymis Handling Conditions on the Quality of Ram Spermatozoa Recovered Post-Mortem. Theriogenology 2003, 60, 1249–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abu, A.H.; Kisani, A.I.; Ahemen, T. Evaluation of Sperm Recovered after Slaughter from Cauda Epididymides of Red Sokoto Bucks. Vet. World 2016, 9, 1440–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gemeda, A.E.; Workalemahu, K. Body Weight and Scrotal-Testicular Biometry in Three Indigenous Breeds of Bucks in Arid and Semiarid Agroecologies, Ethiopia. J. Vet. Med. 2017, 2017, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Pintus, E.; Kadlec, M.; Karlasová, B.; Popelka, M.; Ros-Santaella, J.L. Spermatogenic Activity and Sperm Traits in Post-Pubertal and Adult Tomcats (Felis catus): Implication of Intra-Male Variation in Sperm Size. Cells 2021, 10, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bertol, M.A.F.; Weiss, R.R.; Thomaz-Soccol, V.; Kozicki, L.E.; Fujita, A.S.; de Abreu, R.A.; Green, K.T. Viability of Bull Spermatozoa Collected from the Epididymis Stored at 18–20 °C. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2013, 56, 777–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Martinez-Pastor, F.; Garcia-Macias, V.; Alvarez, M.; Chamorro, C.; Herraez, P.; de Paz, P.; Anel, L. Comparison of Two Methods for Obtaining Spermatozoa from the Cauda Epididymis of Iberian Red Deer. Theriogenology 2006, 65, 471–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Monteiro, G.A.; Guasti, P.N.; Rocha, A.S.; Martin, I.; Sancler-Silva, Y.F.R.; Freitas Dell’Aqua, C.P.; Dell’Aqua, J.A.; Papa, F.O. Effect of Storage Time and Temperature of Equine Epididymis on the Viability, Motion Parameters, and Freezability of Epididymal Sperm. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2013, 33, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Álvarez-Rodriguez, M.; Álvarez, M.; Anel-López, L.; Guerra, C.; Chamorro, C.A.; Anel, L.; de Paz, P.; Martínez-Pastor, F. Effect of Length of Time Post-Mortem on Quality and Freezing Capacity of Cantabric Chamois (Rupicapra Pyrenaica Parva) Epididymal Spermatozoa. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2018, 198, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Tarín, J.J.; García-Pérez, M.A.; Cano, A. It Is Premature to Use Postmortem Sperm for Reproductive Purposes: A Data-Driven Opinion. Reprod. Sci. 2022, 29, 3387–3393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Thuwanut, P.; Srisuwatanasagul, S.; Wongbandue, G.; Tanpradit, N.; Thongpakdee, A.; Tongthainan, D.; Manee-in, S.; Chatdarong, K. Sperm Quality and the Morphology of Cryopreserved Testicular Tissues Recovered Post-Mortem from Diverse Wild Species. Cryobiology 2013, 67, 244–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Saragusty, J.; Gacitua, H.; King, R.; Arav, A. Post-Mortem Semen Cryopreservation and Characterization in Two Different Endangered Gazelle Species (Gazella gazella and Gazella dorcas) and One Subspecies (Gazella gazelle acaiae). Theriogenology 2006, 66, 775–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Strand, J.; Ragborg, M.M.; Pedersen, H.S.; Kristensen, T.N.; Pertoldi, C.; Callesen, H. Effects of Post-Mortem Storage Conditions of Bovine Epididymides on Sperm Characteristics: Investigating a Tool for Preservation of Sperm from Endangered Species. Conserv. Physiol. 2016, 4, cow069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Lone, F.A.; Islam, R.; Khan, M.Z.; Sofi, K.A. Effect of Transportation Temperature on the Quality of Cauda Epididymal Spermatozoa of Ram. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2011, 123, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Tamayo-Canul, J.; Alvarez, M.; López-Urueña, E.; Nicolas, M.; Martinez-Pastor, F.; Anel, E.; Anel, L.; de Paz, P. Undiluted or Extended Storage of Ram Epididymal Spermatozoa as Alternatives to Refrigerating the Whole Epididymes. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2011, 126, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bertol, M.A.F. Cryopreservation of Epididymal Sperm. In Cryopreservation in Eukaryotes; InTech: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  53. Lamglait, B. Longevity of Sperm Cells Retrieved by Post-Mortem Epididymal Aspiration in Wild Bovids in Zoo Conditions. J. Zoo. Aquar. Res. 2014, 2, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chatdarong, K.; Thuwanut, P.; Morrell, J.M. Single-Layer Centrifugation through Colloid Selects Improved Quality of Epididymal Cat Sperm. Theriogenology 2010, 73, 1284–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Prochowska, S.; Niżański, W.; Partyka, A. Low Levels of Apoptotic-like Changes in Fresh and Cryopreserved Feline Spermatozoa Collected from the Urethra and Epididymis. Theriogenology 2017, 88, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Hori, T.; Atago, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Kawakami, E. Influence of Different Methods of Collection from the Canine Epididymides on Post-Thaw Caudal Epididymal Sperm Quality. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2015, 77, 625–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Bedford, J.M. The Functions—Or Not—Of Seminal Plasma? Biol. Reprod. 2015, 92, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nichi, M.; Rijsselaere, T.; Losano, J.; Angrimani, D.; Kawai, G.; Goovaerts, I.; van Soom, A.; Barnabe, V.; de Clercq, J.; Bols, P. Evaluation of Epididymis Storage Temperature and Cryopreservation Conditions for Improved Mitochondrial Membrane Potential, Membrane Integrity, Sperm Motility and In Vitro Fertilization in Bovine Epididymal Sperm. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2017, 52, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Roels, K.; Leemans, B.; Ververs, C.; Govaere, J.; Hoogewijs, M.; van Soom, A. Collection and Freezing of Equine Epididymal Spermatozoa. Vlaams Diergeneeskd. Tijdschr. 2014, 83, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zambelli, D.; Cunto, M. Semen Collection in Cats: Techniques and Analysis. Theriogenology 2006, 66, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Vieira, L.A.; Gadea, J.; García-Vázquez, F.A.; Avilés-López, K.; Matás, C. Equine Spermatozoa Stored in the Epididymis for up to 96 h at 4 °C Can Be Successfully Cryopreserved and Maintain Their Fertilization Capacity. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2013, 136, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Gerits, I.; Angel-Velez, D.; Ververs, C.; Govaere, J.; Van Soom, A.; Smits, K. First Blastocyst Production after ICSI with Zebra Semen. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020, 89, 103053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gambini, A.; Duque Rodríguez, M.; Rodríguez, M.B.; Briski, O.; Flores Bragulat, A.P.; Demergassi, N.; Losinno, L.; Salamone, D.F. Horse Ooplasm Supports in Vitro Preimplantation Development of Zebra ICSI and SCNT Embryos without Compromising YAP1 and SOX2 Expression Pattern. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0238948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Bruemmer, J.E. Collection and Freezing of Epididymal Stallion Sperm. Vet. Clin. North Am. Equine Pract. 2006, 22, 677–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Neuhauser, S.; Gösele, P.; Handler, J. Geburt Eines Fohlens Nach Besamung Mit Tiefgefrorenen Nebenhodenspermien Und Zeitgleicher Intrauteriner Verabreichung von Homologem Seminalplasma. Tierärztliche Prax. Ausg. G Großtiere/Nutztiere 2019, 47, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Goovaerts, I.G.F.; Hoflack, G.G.; van Soom, A.; Dewulf, J.; Nichi, M.; de Kruif, A.; Bols, P.E.J. Evaluation of Epididymal Semen Quality Using the Hamilton–Thorne Analyser Indicates Variation between the Two Caudae Epididymides of the Same Bull. Theriogenology 2006, 66, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Stout, M.A. Comparison of Epididymal and Ejaculated Sperm Collected from the Same Holstein Bulls. Doctoral Dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  68. Filliers, M.; Rijsselaere, T.; Bossaert, P.; Zambelli, D.; Anastasi, P.; Hoogewijs, M.; van Soom, A. In Vitro Evaluation of Fresh Sperm Quality in Tomcats: A Comparison of Two Collection Techniques. Theriogenology 2010, 74, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vernocchi, V.; Morselli, M.G.; Varesi, S.; Nonnis, S.; Maffioli, E.; Negri, A.; Tedeschi, G.; Luvoni, G.C. Sperm Ubiquitination in Epididymal Feline Semen. Theriogenology 2014, 82, 636–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Malo, A.F.; Martinez-Pastor, F.; Olivier, F.; Spies, T.; Roldan, E.R.S.; Bartels, P. Effect of Refrigeration and Cryopreservation on the Quality of Lion Epididymal Spermatozoa. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2004, 16, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Jimenez Gonzalez, S.; Howard, J.G.; Brown, J.; Grajales, H.; Pinzón, J.; Monsalve, H.; Moreno, M.A.; Jimenez Escobar, C. Reproductive Analysis of Male and Female Captive Jaguars (Panthera onca) in a Colombian Zoological Park. Theriogenology 2017, 89, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Fernández-Santos, M.R.; Soler, A.J.; Ramón, M.; Ros-Santaella, J.L.; Maroto-Morales, A.; García-Álvarez, O.; Bisbal, A.; Garde, J.J.; Coloma, M.A.; Santiago-Moreno, J. Effect of Post-Mortem Time on Post-Thaw Characteristics of Spanish Ibex (Capra pyrenaica) Spermatozoa. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2011, 129, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Santiago-Moreno, J.; Toledano-Díaz, A.; Pulido-Pastor, A.; Gómez-Brunet, A.; López-Sebastián, A. Birth of Live Spanish Ibex (Capra pyrenaica hispanica) Derived from Artificial Insemination with Epididymal Spermatozoa Retrieved after Death. Theriogenology 2006, 66, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. López-Saucedo, J.; Paramio, M.T.; Fierro, R.; Izquierdo, D.; Catalá, M.G.; Coloma, M.A.; Toledano-Díaz, A.; López-Sebastián, A.; Santiago-Moreno, J. Sperm Characteristics and Heterologous in Vitro Fertilisation Capacity of Iberian Ibex (Capra pyrenaica) Epididymal Sperm, Frozen in the Presence of the Enzymatic Antioxidant Catalase. Cryobiology 2014, 68, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Martínez-Pastor, F.; Álvarez, M.; Guerra, C.; Chamorro, C.A.; Anel-López, L.; de Paz, P.; Anel, L.; Álvarez-Rodríguez, M. Extender Osmolality, Glycerol and Egg Yolk on the Cryopreservation of Epididymal Spermatozoa for Gamete Banking of the cantabric chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica parva). Theriogenology 2019, 125, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kozdrowski, R.; Niżański, W.; Dubiel, A.; Olech, W. Possibilities of Using the European Bison (Bison bonasus) Epididymal Spermatozoa Collected Post-Mortem for Cryopreservation and Artificial Insemination: A Pilot Study. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2011, 9, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Koziorowski, M.; Seremak, B.; Gilun, P.; Kozioł, K. Season Controlled Reproduction of Undomesticated Animals. Reprod. Biol. 2006, 6, 137–149. [Google Scholar]
  78. Duszewska, A.M.; Baraniewicz-Kołek, M.; Wojdan, J.; Barłowska, K.; Bielecki, W.; Gręda, P.; Niżański, W.; Olech, W. Establishment of a Wisent (Bison bonasus) Germplasm Bank. Animals 2022, 12, 1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bóveda, P.; Esteso, M.C.; Castaño, C.; Toledano-Díaz, A.; López-Sebastián, A.; Muñiz, A.; Prieto, P.; Mejía, O.; Ungerfeld, R.; Santiago-Moreno, J. Slow and Ultra-Rapid Freezing Protocols for Cryopreserving Mouflon (Ovis musimon) and Fallow Deer (Dama dama) Epididymal Sperm. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2018, 192, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chatiza, F.P.; Pieterse, G.M.; Bartels, P.; Nedambale, T.L. Characterization of Epididymal Spermatozoa Motility Rate, Morphology and Longevity of Springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis), Impala (Aepyceros melampus) and Blesbok (Damaliscus dorcus phillipsi): Pre- and Post-Cryopreservation in South Africa. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2011, 126, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mahesh, Y.; Rao, B.; Suman, K.; Lakshmikantan, U.; Charan, K.; Gibence, H.; Shivaji, S. In Vitro Maturation and Fertilization in the Nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus) Using Oocytes and Spermatozoa Recovered Post-Mortem from Animals That Had Died Because of Foot and Mouth Disease Outbreak. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2011, 46, 832–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Segundo Salinas, M.B.; Lertwichaikul, T.; Khunkaew, C.; Boonyayatra, S.; Sringarm, K.; Chuammitri, P.; Sathanawongs, A. Freezability Biomarkers in the Epididymal Spermatozoa of Swamp Buffalo. Cryobiology 2022, 106, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Cocchia, N.; Ciani, F.; El-Rass, R.; Russo, M.; Borzacchiello, G.; Esposito, V.; Montagnaro, S.; Avallone, L.; Tortora, G.; Lorizio, R. Cryopreservation of Feline Epididymal Spermatozoa from Dead and Alive Animals and Its Use in Assisted Reproduction. Zygote 2010, 18, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Jewgenow, K.; Blottner, S.; Lengwinat, T.; Meyer, H.H. New Methods for Gamete Rescue from Gonads of Nondomestic Felids. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 1997, 51, 33–39. [Google Scholar]
  85. Huffmeyer, A.A.; Sikich, J.A.; Vickers, T.W.; Riley, S.P.D.; Wayne, R.K. First Reproductive Signs of Inbreeding Depression in Southern California Male Mountain Lions (Puma concolor). Theriogenology 2022, 177, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ovary|Animal and Human|Britannica. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/science/ovary-animal-and-human (accessed on 17 January 2023).
  87. Ovarium|Definition of Ovarium by Medical Dictionary. Available online: https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/ovarium (accessed on 17 January 2023).
  88. Ovaries and Uterus|Veterian Key. Available online: https://veteriankey.com/ovaries-and-uterus/ (accessed on 17 January 2023).
  89. Purohit, G.N. Anatomy of Female Reproductive Organs in Domestic Animals. Available online: https://www.basu.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/ANATOMY-OF-FEMALE-REPRODUCTIVE-ORGANS-IN-DOMESTIC-ANIMALS-1.pdf (accessed on 17 January 2023).
  90. Murakami, M.; Dong, Y.J.; Suzuki, T.; Taniguchi, M.; Kaedei, Y.; Sato, Y.; Tanihara, F.; Otoi, T. Development and Subsequent Cryotolerance of Domestic Cat Embryos Cultured in Serum-Free and Serum-Containing Media. Cryobiology 2011, 63, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Naoi, H.; Otoi, T.; Shimamura, T.; Karja, N.W.K.; Agung, B.; Shimizu, R.; Taniguchi, M.; Nagai, T. Developmental Competence of Cat Oocytes from Ovaries Stored at Various Temperature for 24 h. J. Reprod. Dev. 2007, 53, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Rodriguez, C.; Anel, L.; Alvarez, M.; Anel, E.; Boixo, J.; Chamorro, C.; Paz, P. Ovum Pick-up in Sheep: A Comparison between Different Aspiration Devices for Optimal Oocyte Retrieval. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2006, 41, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Alm, H.; Torner, H.; Kanitz, W.; Becker, F.; Hinrichs, K. Comparison of Different Methods for the Recovery of Horse Oocytes. Equine Vet. J. 2010, 29, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kauffold, J.; Amer, H.A.H.; Bergfeld, U.; Weber, W.; Sobiraj, A. The In Vitro Developmental Competence of Oocytes from Juvenile Calves Is Related to Follicular Diameter. J. Reprod. Dev. 2005, 51, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Rao, B.S.; Mahesh, Y.U.; Suman, K.; Charan, K.V.; Nath, R.; Rao, K.R. Meiotic Maturation of Oocytes Recovered from the Ovaries of Indian Big Cats at Postmortem. Vitr. Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 2015, 51, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. González, S.M.; da Silva, C.B.; Lindquist, A.G.; Búfalo, I.; Machado, F.Z.; Bueno, J.V.R.; Scarpin, L.C.; Bergamo, L.Z.; Silva-Santos, K.C.; Marinho, L.S.R.; et al. Recovery of Equine Oocytes by Scraping of the Follicular Wall with Different Specifications of Needles and Morphological Analysis of Cumulus oophorus. Semin. Cienc. Agrar. 2015, 36, 4333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Hinrichs, K. The Relationship of Follicle Atresia to Follicle Size, Oocyte Recovery Rate on Aspiration, and Oocyte Morphology in the Mare. Theriogenology 1991, 36, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Hinrichs, K. Production of Embryos by Assisted Reproduction in the Horse. Theriogenology 1998, 49, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Choi, Y.H.; Love, L.B.; Varner, D.D.; Hinrichs, K. Holding Immature Equine Oocytes in the Absence of Meiotic Inhibitors: Effect on Germinal Vesicle Chromatin and Blastocyst Development after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection. Theriogenology 2006, 66, 955–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Diaw, M.; Salgado, R.M.; Canesin, H.S.; Gridley, N.; Hinrichs, K. Effect of Different Shipping Temperatures (∼22 °C vs. ∼7 °C) and Holding Media on Blastocyst Development after Overnight Holding of Immature Equine Cumulus-Oocyte Complexes. Theriogenology 2018, 111, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Pascottini, O.B.; Catteeuw, M.; van Soom, A.; Opsomer, G. Holding Immature Bovine Oocytes in a Commercial Embryo Holding Medium: High Developmental Competence for up to 10 h at Room Temperature. Theriogenology 2018, 107, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Azari-Dolatabad, N.; Benedetti, C.; Velez, D.A.; Montoro, A.F.; Sadeghi, H.; Residiwati, G.; Leroy, J.L.M.R.; van Soom, A.; Pascottini, O.B. Oocyte Developmental Capacity Is Influenced by Intrinsic Ovarian Factors in a Bovine Model for Individual Embryo Production. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2023, 249, 107185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Karja, N.W.K.; Otoi, T.; Murakami, M.; Fahrudin, M.; Suzuki, T. In Vitro Maturation, Fertilization and Development of Domestic Cat Oocytes Recovered from Ovaries Collected at Three Stages of the Reproductive Cycle. Theriogenology 2002, 57, 2289–2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Benham, H.M.; McCollum, M.P.; Nol, P.; Frey, R.K.; Clarke, P.R.; Rhyan, J.C.; Barfield, J.P. Production of Embryos and a Live Offspring Using Post Mortem Reproductive Material from Bison (Bison Bison Bison) Originating in Yellowstone National Park, USA. Theriogenology 2021, 160, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zahmel, J.; Jänsch, S.; Jewgenow, K.; Sandgreen, D.-M.; Skalborg Simonsen, K.; Colombo, M. Maturation and Fertilization of African Lion (Panthera leo) Oocytes after Vitrification. Cryobiology 2021, 98, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kochan, J.; Nowak, A.; Młodawska, W.; Prochowska, S.; Partyka, A.; Skotnicki, J.; Niżański, W. Comparison of the Morphology and Developmental Potential of Oocytes Obtained from Prepubertal and Adult Domestic and Wild Cats. Animals 2020, 11, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Comizzoli, P.; Mermillod, P.; Mauget, R. Reproductive Biotechnologies for Endangered Mammalian Species. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 2000, 40, 493–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Hermes, R.; Göritz, F.; Saragusty, J.; Sós, E.; Molnar, V.; Reid, C.E.; Schwarzenberger, F.; Hildebrandt, T.B. First Successful Artificial Insemination with Frozen-Thawed Semen in Rhinoceros. Theriogenology 2009, 71, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Callealta, I.; Ganswindt, A.; Malan, M.; Lueders, I. Non-Surgical Artificial Insemination Using a GnRH Analogue for Ovulation Induction during Natural Oestrus in African Lions (Panthera leo). Theriogenology 2019, 139, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Conforti, V.A.; Bateman, H.L.; Schook, M.W.; Newsom, J.; Lyons, L.A.; Grahn, R.A.; Deddens, J.A.; Swanson, W.F. Laparoscopic Oviductal Artificial Insemination Improves Pregnancy Success in Exogenous Gonadotropin-Treated Domestic Cats as a Model for Endangered Felids1. Biol. Reprod. 2013, 89, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Swanson, W.F. Laparoscopic Oviductal Embryo Transfer and Artificial Insemination in Felids--Challenges, Strategies and Successes. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2012, 47 (Suppl. S6), 136–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Samper, J.C. Management and Fertility of Mares Bred with Frozen Semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2001, 68, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Diskin, M.G. Review: Semen Handling, Time of Insemination and Insemination Technique in Cattle. Animal 2018, 12, s75–s84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Tsutsui, T. Artificial Insemination in Domestic Cats (Felis catus). Theriogenology 2006, 66, 122–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Trasorras, V.L.; Carretero, M.I.; Neild, D.M.; Chaves, M.G.; Giuliano, S.M.; Miragaya, M.H. Production, Preservation, and Transfer of South American Camelid Embryos. Front. Vet. Sci. 2017, 4, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Fernandez-Gonzalez, L.; Hribal, R.; Stagegaard, J.; Zahmel, J.; Jewgenow, K. Production of Lion (Panthera Leo) Blastocysts after in Vitro Maturation of Oocytes and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection. Theriogenology 2015, 83, 995–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Berg, D.K.; Thongphakdee, A. In Vitro Culture of Deer Embryos. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 2006, 191–207. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  118. Brom-de-Luna, J.G.; Salgado, R.M.; Canesin, H.S.; Diaw, M.; Hinrichs, K. Equine Blastocyst Production under Different Incubation Temperatures and Different CO2 Concentrations during Early Cleavage. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2019, 31, 1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Gonzalez Andueza, S.; Azari-Dolatabad, N.; Benedetti, C.; Fernandez, A.; Angel-Velez, D.; Sadeghi, H.; Malledevarahalli, S.; Opsomer, G.; van Soom, A.; Pascottini, O.B. Lycopene Supplementation to Serum-free Embryo Culture Medium and Its Effect on Development and Quality of Bovine Blastocysts Produced in Vitro. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2022, 57, 1277–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Piras, A.R.; Ariu, F.; Zedda, M.-T.; Paramio, M.-T.; Bogliolo, L. Selection of Immature Cat Oocytes with Brilliant Cresyl Blue Stain Improves In Vitro Embryo Production during Non-Breeding Season. Animals 2020, 10, 1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Snoeck, F. Semen and Oocyte Cryopreservation in the Domestic Cat: The First Steps in the Establishment of a Frozen Zoo for Wild Felids. Ph.D. Thesis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  122. Jacobson, C.C.; Choi, Y.-H.; Hayden, S.S.; Hinrichs, K. Recovery of Mare Oocytes on a Fixed Biweekly Schedule, and Resulting Blastocyst Formation after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection. Theriogenology 2010, 73, 1116–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Claes, A.; Stout, T.A.E. Success Rate in a Clinical Equine in Vitro Embryo Production Program. Theriogenology 2022, 187, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Palmer, E.; Bézard, J.; Magistrini, M.; Duchamp, G. In Vitro Fertilization in the Horse. A Retrospective Study. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 1991, 44, 375–384. [Google Scholar]
  125. Felix, M.R.; Turner, R.M.; Dobbie, T.; Hinrichs, K. Successful in Vitro Fertilization in the Horse: Production of Blastocysts and Birth of Foals after Prolonged Sperm Incubation for Capacitation. Biol. Reprod. 2022, 107, 1551–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Mermillod, P. Gamete and Embryo Technology|In Vitro Fertilization. In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002; pp. 1176–1181. [Google Scholar]
  127. Veraguas, D.; Saez, S.; Aguilera, C.; Echeverry, D.; Gallegos, P.F.; Saez-Ruiz, D.; Castro, F.O.; Rodriguez-Alvarez, L. In Vitro and in Vivo Development of Domestic Cat Embryos Generated by in Vitro Fertilization after ECG Priming and Oocyte in Vitro Maturation. Theriogenology 2020, 146, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hatzel, J.N.; Stokes, J. Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection. In Equine Reproductive Procedures; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 187–189. [Google Scholar]
  129. Hinrichs, K. Update on Equine ICSI and Cloning. Theriogenology 2005, 64, 535–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Salamone, D.F.; Canel, N.G.; Rodríguez, M.B. Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Domestic and Wild Mammals. Reproduction 2017, 154, F111–F124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  131. Hinrichs, K. In Vitro Production of Equine Embryos: State of the Art. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2010, 45, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Angel-Velez, D.; de Coster, T.; Hedia, M.; Gerits, I.; Peere, S.; Papas, M.; van den Branden, E.; Govaere, J.; van Soom, A.; Smits, K. Holding Effect in a Commercial OPU-ICSI Program: A Retrospective Study. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022, 113, 103984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Magata, F.; Tsuchiya, K.; Okubo, H.; Ideta, A. Application of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection to the Embryo Production in Aged Cows. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2019, 81, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Pope, C.E. Thirty Years of Assisted Reproductive Technology in the Domestic Cat: A Selected Summary. In Proceedings of the XXXIII Congress of the Brazilian Society of Animal Reproduction, Gramado, Brazil, 15–18 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
  135. Lonergan, P.; Fair, T. Maturation of Oocytes in Vitro. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2016, 4, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Artificial Insemination—Elephant Encyclopedia and Database. Available online: https://www.elephant.se/index.php?id=226. (accessed on 1 April 2023).
  137. Martin-Wintle, M.S.; Kersey, D.C.; Wintle, N.J.P.; Aitken-Palmer, C.; Owen, M.A.; Swaisgood, R.R. Comprehensive Breeding Techniques for the Giant Panda. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1200, 275–308. [Google Scholar]
  138. Howard, J.G.; Lynch, C.; Santymire, R.M.; Marinari, P.E.; Wildt, D.E. Recovery of Gene Diversity Using Long-Term Cryopreserved Spermatozoa and Artificial Insemination in the Endangered Black-Footed Ferret. Anim. Conserv. 2016, 19, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Howell, L.G.; Johnston, S.D.; O’Brien, J.K.; Frankham, R.; Rodger, J.C.; Ryan, S.A.; Beranek, C.T.; Clulow, J.; Hudson, D.S.; Witt, R.R. Modelling Genetic Benefits and Financial Costs of Integrating Biobanking into the Captive Management of Koalas. Animals 2022, 12, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Lueders, I.; Ludwig, C.; Schroeder, M.; Mueller, K.; Zahmel, J.; Dehnhard, M. Successful Nonsurgical Artificial Insemination and Hormonal Monitoring in an Asiatic Golden Cat (Catopuma temmincki). J. Zoo. Wildl. Med. 2014, 45, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Cortez, J.; Hardwicke, K.; Cuervo-Arango, J.; Grupen, C. Oocytes Obtained by Ovum Pick-up from Live Mares as an Alternative to Abattoir-Derived Oocytes for the Development of Equine Embryos Produced by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022, 113, 103971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Overview of hybrids between domestic and wildlife animals, born within the Equidae, Bovidae, and Felidae families.
Table 1. Overview of hybrids between domestic and wildlife animals, born within the Equidae, Bovidae, and Felidae families.
Domestic AnimalFamilyWildlife AnimalReference
Domestic horse
(Equus caballus)		EquidaeMountain zebra (Equus zebra)[13]
Plains zebra (Equus quagga)[14]
Grévy’s zebra (Equus grevyi)[14]
Donkey (Equus asinus)[15]
Przewalski’s horse (Equus przewalskii)[16]
Domestic cattle
(Bos taurus)		BovidaeAmerican bison (Bison bison)[17]
European bison (Bison bonasus)[18]
Banteng (Bos javanicus)[19]
Wild yak (Bos mutus)[19]
Domestic cat
(Felis catus)		FelidaeServal (Leptailurus serval)[20]
Leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis)[21]
Sand cat (Felis margarita)[22]
Fishing cat (Prionailurus viverrinus)[23]
Scottish wildcat (Felis silvestris)[24]
Caracal (Caracal caracal)[25]
Jungle cat (Felis chaus)[26]
Table
Table 2. Weight of the testis and epididymis and the total sperm output for a few example species in the Equidae, Bovidae, and Felidae families.
Table 2. Weight of the testis and epididymis and the total sperm output for a few example species in the Equidae, Bovidae, and Felidae families.
FamilySpeciesTestis Weight (Grams)Epididymal Weight
(Grams)		Total Sperm
Output		Reference
EquidaeHorse103.0 ± 6.318.5−21.51.9–7.5 × 109[33]
Donkey-14.2 ± 2.36.4–14.8 × 109[34]
Egyptian donkey91.92 ± 4.662.52 ± 0.12-[35]
BovidaeCattle272 ± 1123 ± 113.3 ± 0.7 × 109[36]
Awassi sheep157.622.5 ± 1.155.8 × 109[37]
Moufflon191.11 ± 4.934.36 ± 0.7-[38]
Red Sokoto goat56.36.97-[39]
Afar goat67.6 ± 3.4910.7 ± 1.20-[40]
Long-eared Somali goat74.8 ± 5.8111.1 ± 1.44-[40]
Woyto-Guji goat67.6 ± 3.977.92 ± 1.06-[40]
FelidaeDomestic cat1.49 ± 0.520.31 ± 0.06-[41]
Table
Table 3. Overview of the Equidae, Bovidae, and Felidae species, in which sperm have been collected postmortem and the method used.
Table 3. Overview of the Equidae, Bovidae, and Felidae species, in which sperm have been collected postmortem and the method used.
FamilySpeciesTechniqueTransportation TemperatureSemen
ConcentrationmL−1		MotilityProduction of
Embryo or Offspring		Reference
EquidaePlains zebra (Equus quagga)No dataNo dataNo dataNo data+[63]
Retrograde flushingNo dataNo dataNo data+[62]
BovidaeSpanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica)Epididymal mincing12 °CNo data87.1%-[72]
Epididymal mincing12 °CNo data78.1%+[73]
Retrograde flushing9–11 °CNo data83.7%+[74]
Sumatran serows
(Capricorns sumatraensis sumatraensis)		Testicular mincing4–5 °CNo dataNo data-[47]
Cantabric chamois
(Rupicapra pyrenaica parva)		Epididymal mincing4–5 °C3.8 × 10985.0%-[45]
Epididymal mincingRefrigeratedNo data68.7%-[75]
Mountain gazelle (Gazella gazella)Epididymal mincingAmbient
temperature		No data60–80%-[48]
Dorcas gazelle (Gazella dorcas)Epididymal mincingAmbient
temperature		No data75%-[48]
European bison (Bison bonasus)Epididymal mincing15 °C3.2 × 10760–90%+[76]
Epididymal mincingNo data1.90 × 109No data-[77]
Epididymal mincingNo dataNo dataNo data+[78]
Moufflon (Ovis musimon)Epididymal mincing22 °C3.7 × 10980.3%+[38]
Retrograde flushingNo dataNo data61.3%-[79]
Retrograde flushing4 °CNo dataNo data-[53]
Barbary sheep
(Ammotragus lervia)		Retrograde flushing4 °CNo dataNo data-[53]
Springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis)Retrograde flushing4–5 °CNo data86.2%-[80]
Retrograde flushing4 °CNo dataNo data-[53]
Gemsbok (Oryx gazella)Retrograde flushing4 °CNo dataNo data-[53]
Southern lechwe (Kobus leche)Retrograde flushing4 °CNo dataNo data-[53]
Defassa waterbuck (Kobus ellipsiprymnus)Retrograde flushing4 °CNo dataNo data-[53]
Impala (Aepyceros melampus)Retrograde flushing4–5 °CNo data82.9%-[80]
Retrograde flushing4 °CNo dataNo data-[53]
Blesbok (Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi)Retrograde flushing4–5 °CNo data85.8%-[80]
Retrograde flushing4 °CNo dataNo data-[53]
Nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus)Epididymal mincingNo dataNo data50–60%+[81]
Blue wildebeest
(Connochaetes taurinus)		Retrograde flushing4 °CNo dataNo data-[53]
Cape eland (Taurotragus oryx)Retrograde flushing4 °CNo dataNo data-[53]
Greater kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros)Retrograde flushing4 °CNo dataNo data-[53]
Sitatunga (Tragelaphus spekii)Retrograde flushing4 °CNo dataNo data-[53]
Dwarf forest buffalo (Syncerus caffer nanus)Retrograde flushing4 °CNo dataNo data-[53]
Swamp buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)Epididymal mincingOn ice2.1 × 10866%-[82]
FelidaeJungle cat (Felis chaus)Testicular mincing4–5 °CNo dataNo data-[47]
Tiger (Panthera tigris)Epididymal mincing20–24 °C5.2 × 10738.3%-[83]
Lion (Panthera leo)Testicular mincing4–5 °CNo dataNo data-[47]
Epididymal mincingNo dataNo dataNo data+[84]
Leopard (Panthera
pardus)		Testicular mincing4–5 °CNo dataNo data-[47]
Epididymal mincingNo dataNo dataNo data+[84]
Puma (Felis concolor)Epididymal mincingNo dataNo dataNo data+[84]
Epididymal mincing4 °CNo dataNo data-[85]
Jaguar (Panthera onca)Epididymal mincingNo dataNo dataNo data+[84]
Table
Table 4. Overview of the Bovidae and Felidae species, in which oocytes have been collected postmortem and the collection method.
Table 4. Overview of the Bovidae and Felidae species, in which oocytes have been collected postmortem and the collection method.
FamilySpeciesTechniqueTransportation TemperatureNumber of
Oocytes		% IVMProduction of
Embryo or
Offspring		Reference
BovidaeAmerican Bison (Bison bison)Aspiration25–28 °C9836No data+[104]
European bison (Bison bonansus)Aspiration30 °C5084.3% *+[78]
Nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus)Cutting38.5 °C51763.6%+[81]
FelidaeLion (Panthera leo)SievingNo data6669.7%-[84]
CuttingImmediately
processed		119 **52.1% **+[105]
Cutting37 °C3353.8%-[95]
Tiger (Panthera tigris)SievingNo data6354.0%-[84]
Cutting37 °C2256.3%-[95]
Leopard (Panthera
pardus)		SievingNo data955.6%-[84]
Cutting37 °C6458.7%-[95]
Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx)Cutting4 °C4748.0% *-[106]
Serval (Leptailurus
serval)		Cutting4 °C30No data-[106]
Pallas’s cat (Felis manul)Cutting4 °C10450.0% *-[106]
Puma (Felis concolor)SievingNo data2580.0%-[84]
*: %IVM of for maturation selected oocytes; **: partly fresh, partly vitrified.
Table
Table 5. Overview of the Equidae, Bovidae, and Felidae species, in which postmortem sperm and/or oocytes have been used as gametes in an artificial reproduction technique, including whether offspring has been produced or not.
Table 5. Overview of the Equidae, Bovidae, and Felidae species, in which postmortem sperm and/or oocytes have been used as gametes in an artificial reproduction technique, including whether offspring has been produced or not.
FamilySpeciesPM GameteTechniqueResultsReference
EquidaePlains zebra (Equus quagga)SpermICSI with horse
oocyte		6.12%, day 11 blastocyst rate
No embryo transfer		[63]
SpermICSI with horse
oocyte		7% blastocyst rate
No embryo transfer		[62]
BovidaeEuropean bison (Bison bonasus)SpermAI2/30 (6.7%) gave birth to hybrid calves[76]
Sperm and
Oocyte		IVF10.7% morula plus early blastocyst rate
3/5 (60%) pregnant after interspecies embryo transfer
No offspring		[78]
American bison (Bison bison)OocyteIVF8.3% blastocyst rate
1/10 (10%) gave birth		[104]
Nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus) Sperm and
Oocyte		IVF42% cleaved
0% blastocyst rate		[81]
Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica)Sperm AI1/6 (16.7%) gave birth [73]
Sperm and
Oocyte		IVF with domestic goat oocyte21.2% blastocyst rate
No embryo transfer		[74]
Moufflon (Ovis musimon) SpermIVF53% cleaved
No embryo transfer		[38]
FelidaeLion (Panthera leo)Sperm and
Oocyte		IVF of lion oocyte with lion semen + domestic cat semen31.6% embryos > 8 cells with lion semen
0% embryos > 8 cells with domestic cat semen
No embryo transfer		[84]
OocyteICSI24.1% cleaved
0% blastocyst rate		[105]
Tiger (Panthera tigris)Sperm and
Oocyte		IVF with domestic cat semen0% embryos > 8 cells [84]
Leopard (Panthera pardus)Sperm and
Oocyte		IVF with domestic cat semen22.2% embryos > 8 cells
No embryo transfer		[84]
SpermIVF with domestic cat oocyte19.5% embryos > 8 cells
No embryo transfer		[84]
Puma (Felis concolor)Sperm and
Oocyte		IVF20% embryos > 8 cells
No embryo transfer		[84]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huijsmans, T.E.R.G.; Hassan, H.A.; Smits, K.; Van Soom, A. Postmortem Collection of Gametes for the Conservation of Endangered Mammals: A Review of the Current State-of-the-Art. Animals 2023, 13, 1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081360

AMA Style

Huijsmans TERG, Hassan HA, Smits K, Van Soom A. Postmortem Collection of Gametes for the Conservation of Endangered Mammals: A Review of the Current State-of-the-Art. Animals. 2023; 13(8):1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081360

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huijsmans, Tim E. R. G., Hiba Ali Hassan, Katrien Smits, and Ann Van Soom. 2023. "Postmortem Collection of Gametes for the Conservation of Endangered Mammals: A Review of the Current State-of-the-Art" Animals 13, no. 8: 1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081360

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop