Next Article in Journal
Mycobacterium avium Subspecies paratuberculosis in Asymptomatic Zoo Herbivores in Poland
Next Article in Special Issue
Short-Term Survival and Postoperative Complications Rates in Horses Undergoing Colic Surgery: A Multicentre Study
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Rotational Grazing and Crossbreeding as Options for Beef Production to Reduce GHG Emissions and Feed-Food Competition through Farm-Level Bio-Economic Modeling
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/ani13061021
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dexmedetomidine Has Differential Effects on the Contractility of Equine Jejunal Smooth Muscle Layers In Vitro

by
Nicole Verhaar
1,*,
Susanne Hoppe
2,
Anna Marei Grages
1,
Kathrin Hansen
2,
Stephan Neudeck
3,
Sabine Kästner
1,3,† and
Gemma Mazzuoli-Weber
2,†
1
Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany
2
Institute for Physiology and Cell Biology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30173 Hannover, Germany
3
Small Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2023, 13(6), 1021; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13061021
Submission received: 25 January 2023 / Revised: 24 February 2023 / Accepted: 7 March 2023 / Published: 10 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Focus on Gut Health in Horses: Current Research and Approaches)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Alpha-2 agonists are commonly used sedatives in horses. They are known for their inhibitive effects on gastrointestinal motility, which limits their use in horses with colic. Dexmedetomidine belongs to the α2 agonist drug class, and studies in human patients have reported that it may enhance gastrointestinal function instead of inhibiting it. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine on intestinal smooth muscle function in horses. To evaluate this in varying degrees of intestinal damage, tissue samples were taken from 12 horses prior to and during the disruption of small intestinal blood flow (pre-ischaemia and ischaemia), as well as following the reinstatement of blood supply (reperfusion). We found that the circular smooth muscle (CSM) contractility was not affected by ischaemia, whereas the longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) showed an increase in both spontaneous and nerve mediated contractile activity. The addition of dexmedetomidine caused a decrease in the spontaneous contractile activity of CSM, but an increase in that of LSM. During ischaemia, dexmedetomidine also mildly increased the nerve mediated contractile activity. These results may indicate a stimulatory effect of dexmedetomidine on small intestinal contractility. However, the influence of dexmedetomidine administration on intestinal motility in vivo needs to be further investigated.

Abstract

α2 agonists are frequently used in horses with colic, even though they have been shown to inhibit gastrointestinal motility. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of dexmedetomidine on small intestinal in vitro contractility during different phases of ischaemia. Experimental segmental jejunal ischaemia was induced in 12 horses under general anaesthesia, and intestinal samples were taken pre-ischaemia and following ischaemia and reperfusion. Spontaneous and electrically evoked contractile activity of the circular and longitudinal smooth muscles were determined in each sample with and without the addition of dexmedetomidine. During a second experiment, tetrodotoxin was added to determine if the effect was neurogenic. We found that the circular smooth muscle (CSM) contractility was not affected by ischaemia, whereas the longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) showed an increase in both spontaneous and induced contractile activity. The addition of dexmedetomidine caused a decrease in the spontaneous contractile activity of CSM, but an increase in that of LSM, which was not mediated by the enteric nervous system. During ischaemia, dexmedetomidine also mildly increased the electrically induced contractile activity in LSM. These results may indicate a stimulatory effect of dexmedetomidine on small intestinal contractility. However, the influence of dexmedetomidine administration on intestinal motility in vivo needs to be further investigated.

1. Introduction

Motility disorders of the small intestine are associated with high mortality rates in horses [1,2,3]. The most common manifestation is a post-operative ileus following colic surgery for strangulating intestinal lesions, with an initial neurogenic and subsequent inflammatory phase inhibiting intestinal motility [4,5]. Many factors can contribute to reduced gastrointestinal (GI) motility, such as intestinal manipulation or anastomosis and the use of opioids or sedatives [6,7,8]. Even though α2-adrenergic agonists can inhibit intestinal motility, the use of these drugs for sedation or analgesia during the perioperative period of colic surgery may be inevitable in some cases. Looking more closely at the evidence available for the inhibition of intestinal motility by α2 agonists, experimental trials in healthy horses have shown that xylazine, detomidine, and romifidine decrease the myoelectrical and/or mechanical activity of the small intestine in an experimental setting [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Other reported GI effects of this drug class are decreased borborygmia following detomidine administration [15] and dose-dependently reduced intestinal smooth muscle contractions caused by xylazine and detomidine addition in vitro [16]. A peripheral α2-adrenoceptor antagonist Vatinoxan was shown to prevent (me)detomidine mediated decrease in borborygmia, indicating that this hypomotility is most likely mediated through activation of the peripheral α2-adrenoceptor [15,17].
Medetomidine and its active D-isomer dexmedetomidine are more selective α2 agonists that are not as commonly used in horses, yet are known produce effective and safe sedation [18,19,20]. These drugs have also been shown to affect intestinal function, with medetomidine decreasing intestinal circular smooth muscle contractility in vitro [16], and decreased borborygmia being documented the first hour after dexmedetomidine administration in horses and donkeys [18,21].
Remarkably, clinical studies in humans have found that dexmedetomidine may enhance intestinal motility peri-operatively or during the continuous sedation of patients in intensive care. These studies reported a variety of improved clinical GI parameters such as increased intestinal sounds and decreased passage time with dexmedetomidine administration compared with treatment with saline as placebo, lidocaine, morphine, and propofol [22,23,24,25,26,27]. Different mechanisms of action have been proposed for this phenomenon, such as the attenuation of inflammation and ischaemic injury or vagal stimulation [28,29,30]; however, there is no direct evidence available to validate these theories. Experimental trials investigating this phenomenon have yielded conflicting results. Studies performed in laboratory animals have reported both inhibitive and stimulating GI effects of dexmedetomidine [29,31,32,33,34], and one study in healthy human individuals found decreased GI passage [35].
With uncertainty surrounding the topic of dexmedetomidine and its effect on intestinal motility, this brings up the question of how dexmedetomidine influences GI motility in horses. If dexmedetomidine could elicit a comparable stimulation of GI function, as seen in humans, this could offer an alternative to the commonly used GI inhibiting α2 agonists. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine on the in vitro contractility of equine jejunal smooth muscle during pre-ischaemia, ischaemia, and reperfusion. The second objective was to compare the response of circular smooth muscle (CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM), as these play a different role in intestinal motility and may show different responses to the addition of pharmacological substances, as shown in other species [36]. Further objectives were to investigate if the effect is mediated by the enteric nervous system (ENS), and to assess how ischaemic injury affects intestinal contractility. We hypothesized that dexmedetomidine addition would negatively affect contractility, and that this would be more pronounced in CSM. Furthermore, we hypothesized that this would be independent of ENS, and that ischaemic injury of the intestine would further decrease contractility.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

Twelve horses were subjected to experimental segmental jejunal ischaemia under general anaesthesia. The intestinal tissue samples taken during the different ischaemia phases were used for this controlled in vitro experimental trial. Seven mares, two geldings, and three stallions were selected for this terminal study because of severe musculoskeletal issues. The horses were warmbloods with a mean age of 15.9 ± 7.4 years and weight of 547 ± 53 kg. Physical examination, blood cell count, and faecal egg count were performed to assess the general health of the horses prior to the experiment. At least 2 weeks prior to surgery, the horses were stabled at the facilities of the equine clinic of the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, with free access to hay and water. On the day of the trial, food but not water was withheld for 6 h prior to anaesthesia.

2.2. Surgical Procedure

Following premedication with 5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine (Dexdomitor, Orion Corporation, Espoo, Finland), general anaesthesia was induced (0.05 mg/kg diazepam, Diazedor, WDT eG, Garbsen, Germany; 2.2 mg/kg ketamine, Narketan, Vétoquinol GmbH, Ismaning, Germany). Isoflurane (Isofluran CP, CP-Pharma GmbH, Burgdorf, Germany) in 100% oxygen combined with a continuous rate infusion of dexmedetomidine (5 µg/kg/h) was used to maintain general anaesthesia. Direct blood pressure measurements were performed in the facial artery, and the mean arterial pressure was maintained between 60 and 80 mmHg by administrating lactated Ringer’s solution (RingerLaktat EcobagClick, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany) and dobutamine (Dobutamin-ratiopharm 250 mg, Ratiopharm GmbH, Ulm, Germany) to effect. A pre-umbilical median laparotomy was performed in dorsal recumbency. After checking the intestines for pre-existing abnormalities, a jejunal segment located 7 m oral to the ileocecal fold was taken as control (pre-ischaemia sample). Forty-five minutes after induction, segmental ischaemia was induced by occlusion of the mesenteric arteries and veins with umbilical tape in 2 m of aboral jejunum that was located 1 m oral to the ileocaecal fold. In six horses, no flow ischaemia was induced by complete tightening of the ligatures. In the other six horses, low flow ischaemia was implemented with 80% reduction in intestinal blood flow under monitoring with Laser Doppler fluxmetry (O2C, LEA Medizintechnik GmbH, Giessen, Germany). Ischaemia was maintained for 120 min, and prior to removal of the ligatures, another tissue sample was taken from the ischaemic segment (ischaemia sample). Subsequently, reperfusion was initiated, followed by resection of the reperfusion sample after 120 min of reperfusion. The horses were euthanized with 90 mg/kg pentobarbital administered intravenously (Release 50 mg/mL, WDT eG, Garbsen, Germany) after the final sample was taken.

2.3. Organ Bath

2.3.1. In Vitro Experiment—Day 1

The jejunal samples were placed in a modified Krebs−Henseleit buffer (117.0 mmol/l NaCl, 4.7 mmol/l KCl, 2.5 mmol/l CaCl2, 1.2 mmol/l MgCl2, 1.2 mmol/l NaH2PO4, 11.0 mmol/l Glucose, and 25 mmol/l NaHCO3) at 4 °C and transferred to the Institute for Physiology and Cell Biology. For each time point (pre-ischaemia, ischaemia, and reperfusion) from all horses (n = 12), eight smooth muscle tissue strips including CSM and LSM of equal size (1 × 0.5 cm) and weight were prepared from each jejunal sample. Consequently, there were two tissue strips used as the control samples and two tissue strips used to test the effect of dexmedetomidine for each type of smooth muscle tested (Figure 1). In the analyses following the experiment, the values of these duplicates were averaged.
The tissue strips were placed into an organ bath filled with 12 mL of modified Krebs−Henseleit buffer (117.0 mmol/l NaCl, 4.7 mmol/l KCl, 2.5 mmol/l CaCl2, 1.2 mmol/l MgCl2, 1.2 mmol/l NaH2PO4, 11.0 mmol/l Glucose, and 20 mmol/l NaHCO3) with constant aeration with 95% O2 and 5% CO2, and mounted on an isometric force transducer (Hottinger Baldwin Messtechnik, Darmstadt, Germany). The initial tension of the muscle strips was adjusted to 2 g, which corresponds to 20 mN. Isometric contractile forces of smooth muscle tissues were continuously measured using a chart recorder (4.8 kHz/direct current; Spider 8 chart recorder, Hottinger Baldwin Messtechnik) until the end of the experiment at 120 min, and data were collected with data acquisition software (catmanEasy software, version 1.01, Hottinger Baldwin Mess-technik). The viability and response of the enteric nervous system and smooth muscle cells was tested with electrical field stimulation (EFS) with pulses of 0.5 ms during 10 s with 10 Hz and 30 V at 65, 95, and 110 min (Figure 1). At 80 min (t80), 1 μM dexmedetomidine hydrochloride (Dexdomitor, Orion Corporation) was added to the organ bath chambers. Spontaneous contractile activity was determined based on baseline tension (g), frequency (peak/min), amplitude (mN), and mean active force (MAF; mN) at t75–80 and t105–110 (Figure 1). These time points were selected for the analysis, after visual inspection of all of the results, because this time frame included representative spontaneous intestinal motility before and following dexmedetomidine addition. In the dexmedetomidine-treated LSM samples, these values were also determined at t~85, because the visual inspection of the original traces indicated an intense response in the LSM directly following the addition of dexmededetomidine. Induced contractile activity as a response to EFS was expressed in amplitude (mN), which was quantified at t65 and t110.

2.3.2. In Vitro Experiment—Day 2

The full thickness intestinal tissue of the pre-ischaemia samples was stored in the refrigerator at 4 °C overnight, and on day 2 of the experiment, the tissue strips of smooth muscle were freshly prepared. The aim of this experiment was to test the response to dexmedetomidine with and without tetrodotoxin (TTX) to determine if the changes elicited by dexmedetomidine were nerve dependent. This part of the experiment was only performed with the pre-ischaemia samples of eight horses. The vitality of the tissues was tested by EFS. Then, 1 μM dexmedetomidine was added to all of the samples, with and without 1 μM TTX. The time schedule was comparable to that of the experiment on day 1, with the addition of TTX at t70 and the addition of dexmedetomidine at t80. Successful inhibition was verified by a lack of response to EFS.

2.4. Data Analysis

A power analysis was performed before commencing the study (G*Power 3.1.9.1s). To detect a difference of 10 mN in amplitude between the treatment groups with a standard deviation of 5 mN, based on a power of 0.8 and alpha of 0.05 through the use of a two-tailed unpaired two sample t-test, a total sample size of 12 horses was required.
Statistical analysis and graph design were performed using commercially available software (Excel 2016, Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA; Graphpad Prism 9.4.1, Graphpad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Data were presented as mean (±standard deviation). Data were tested for normal distribution using a Shapiro−Wilk test. The values for basal contractile activity and response to EFS were compared between the groups subjected to low flow and no flow ischaemia using a two-tailed unpaired two sample t-test. As there were no significant differences between the horses subjected to the different low-flow and no-flow ischaemia types, the results of both groups were combined for further statistical analysis. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Differences between the different ischaemia phases at t75–80 were compared using a repeated measures ANOVA with Greenhouse–Geisser correction of the p-values, followed by a post hoc Tukey test for multiple pairwise comparisons. To evaluate the development over time in the organ bath with or without dexmedetomidine, the basal contractility was compared between t75–80 and t105–110 and the response to EFS between t65 and t110 using a two-tailed paired t-test. A comparison between the samples treated with and without dexmedetomidine was performed for each time point using a two-tailed unpaired two sample t-test.

3. Results

3.1. Ischaemia Model

There were no significant differences between the groups subjected to low-flow and no-flow ischaemia. Therefore, the results of the two ischaemia groups were pooled for further data presentation and analysis.

3.2. Basal Contractile Activity

3.2.1. Ischaemia Phases

Comparing the different ischaemia phases at t75–80, ischaemia and reperfusion did not affect the contractility of the CSM in any of the tested variables. In contrast, the ischaemic and reperfused LSM showed a significantly higher frequency, amplitude, and MAF compared with the pre-ischaemic values (Figure 2).

3.2.2. Development over Time without the Addition of Dexmed

Comparing the different time points t75–80 and t105–110 of the organ bath experiment, CSM showed an elevated amplitude in the ischaemia samples and an elevated MAF in the reperfusion samples at t105–110 (Figure 3). LSM showed a significant increase in amplitude over time in all of the samples. LSM frequency was elevated in the ischaemia samples only, whereas MAF increased over time in the ischaemia and reperfusion samples.

3.2.3. Effect of Dexmedetomidine Addition

Evaluating the initial response to dexmedetomidine addition at t~85, all of the tested variables of the basal contractile activity were significantly increased in the LSM of all ischaemia phases, whereas no significant initial response of CSM was observed.
Comparing the basal contractility at t105–110 between the samples with and without dexmedetomidine addition, the pre-ischaemia and ischaemia CSM exhibited a significantly lower frequency in the dexmedetomidine-treated samples (Figure 4). Furthermore, the ischaemia CSM showed a significantly lower MAF with dexmedetomidine. Dexmedetomidine did not affect the frequency of LSM. In contrast, LSM amplitude and MAF were significantly higher in the dexmedetomidine-treated samples of all of the ischaemia phases (Figure 4).

3.3. Electrical Field Stimulation

3.3.1. Ischaemia Phases

The amplitude of EFS that induced the contractile activity of CSM was comparable during the different ischaemia phases. In LSM, the ischaemia and reperfusion samples exhibited higher amplitudes than the pre-ischaemia samples (Figure 5).

3.3.2. Development over Time without the Addition of Dexmed

CSM and LSM showed a significant change in response to EFS comparing t110 with t65, with an increased amplitude in all of the ischaemia phases (Figure 6).

3.3.3. Effect of Dexmedetomidine Addition

There were no significant differences in response to EFS of CSM for any of the ischaemia phases. In LSM, the amplitude was significantly higher in the dexmedetomidine-treated ischaemia samples (p = 0.02) compared with the untreated ischaemia samples (Figure 7). During the other ischaemia phases, this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.059 and p = 0.80 for pre-ischaemia and reperfusion, respectively).

3.4. Day 2 of the In Vitro Experiment—Dexmedetomidine with and without TTX

All of the tissue samples used in these experiments showed vitality, as they exhibited spontaneous motility and they responded to EFS. Comparing the basal contractile activity at t105–110 of the pre-ischaemia samples that were treated with dexmedetomidine with and without the addition of TTX, there were no significant differences between these groups (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

The main finding of the study was that the in vitro addition of dexmedetomidine caused a decrease in the spontaneous contractile activity of CSM, but an increase in that of LSM. The in vitro addition of dexmedetomidine also stimulated the nerve-mediated contractile activity of LSM, yet to a lesser extent. Therefore, we partially rejected the first hypothesis that dexmedetomidine addition would negatively affect contractility. The changes in basal contractile activity were not affected by the addition of TTX, indicating that this was not mediated by ENS, confirming the second hypothesis. The contractility of CSM was not affected by the different phases of ischaemia. In contrast, LSM showed an increased basal and EFS induced contractile activity following ischaemia and reperfusion, leading to the rejection of the third hypothesis.
The stimulating effect of ischaemia on the spontaneous contractile activity of LSM found in the current study is in contrast with studies performed in various species reporting that ischaemia reduced the intestinal contractility of the affected and neighbouring intestinal segments [29,37,38,39,40]. Discrepancies between some of these studies and the current investigation could be attributed to differences between species, in which the SM layer was investigated, or for the variance in ischaemia duration (15 min vs. 2 h). The increase in LSM contractile activity may be caused by a stress response with sympathetic activation leading to initial hypermotility. Circulating catecholamines could affect SM directly, considering that norepinephrine has been shown to elicit excitatory effects in the human colon when binding at α1-adrenoceptor D subtypes [41]. Furthermore, the stress-related activation of intestinal corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptors could mediate the stimulation of motility [42]. Regarding the clinical occurrence of a postoperative ileus in the horse, there is only sparse evidence for the pathophysiologic mechanism in this species [5]. In general, rodent models have shown that sympathetic stimulation can lead to decreased motility in this disease entity [43].
Dexmedetomidine increased the spontaneous and nerve-mediated contractile activity of LSM. This response differed from the effect on the circular layer, where it decreased CSM contractile activity. This corresponds with previous investigations in horses and rats that have shown a varying response to α2-adrenoceptor agonists in the different muscle layers, with inhibited or unchanged CSM contractility, as well as unchanged or enhanced LSM contractility [36,44,45]. These differences may be caused by asymmetric innervation of CSM and LSM with possible variation in α-adrenoreceptor distribution, and may facilitate a reciprocal contractile activity of the two muscle layers [46,47].
In the current study, TTX addition did not change the effect of dexmedetomidine, hence it can be concluded that the observed effect on the spontaneous contractile activity was not mediated through ENS. In line with our results, other studies have also shown that spontaneous contractile activity in equine jejunum and ileum was independent of ENS [16,48]. The effect of dexmedetomidine in this context could be elicited through direct stimulation of receptors on the smooth muscle itself [49]. In the rat ileum, α2 adrenoceptors were shown to be negligible in direct muscular effects of adrenergic agonists. However, this may not be the case for other species, considering the major interspecies differences in α2-adrenoceptors’ subtypes and distribution [45,50]. There are no data available on the distribution of α2-adrenoceptor subtypes in horses, complicating direct comparison and the extrapolation of the results obtained in other species. Apart from direct stimulation of the smooth muscle, other possible explanations for the observed effect on the spontaneous contractile activity may include the activation of adrenoreceptors on the platelet-derived growth factor receptor α+ cells (PDGFRα+ cells), which are electrically coupled with smooth muscle cells in the intestine [41]. Alternatively, it could influence the pacemaker activity of the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC), which can be independent of ENS [51]. However, the presence of α adrenoceptors on intestinal ICC has not been clarified completely [41,52], and there are no studies available investigating this in horses. Another possible mechanism of action of dexmedetomidine could be an effect on the enteric glia Ca2+ response [31], which alters the membrane potential of the smooth muscle cell.
The increased nerve mediated contractile activity may be caused by dexmedetomidine enhanced stimulation of α receptors located on cholinergic neurons of ENS [45,53]. Another possible mechanism of action may be the activation of nonadrenergic imidazoline receptors by dexmedetomidine [54], considering that presynaptic imidazoline receptors have been indicated as a pathway to attenuate ENS response by modulating intestinal cholinergic neurotransmission [54]. However, this could not be confirmed in guinea pig ileum, revealing that imidazoline-like compounds only modulated cholinergic neurotransmission through the interaction with presynaptic α2 adrenoceptors instead of imidazoline receptors [53]. Therefore, this theory is less plausible, yet again, with the limitation of the extrapolation of experimental data between different species.
Reviewing the previous studies investigating dexmedetomidine and other α2 agonists on in vitro contractility, both enhanced and inhibited contractility have been reported. Xylazine, detomidine, and medetomidine reduced spontaneous and/or evoked contractility in horse jejunum, guinea pig duodenum, and mice ileum [16,55,56]. On the other hand, two studies in the rat ileum found that dexmedetomidine increased the amplitude of spontaneous contractions without affecting the frequency [34], and that dexmedetomidine reduced the ischaemia induced inhibition of contractility [29]. Differences between experiment duration, species, and the small intestinal segments that were used, complicate the exact comparison of the studies. Furthermore, different tissue preparations were used, with full thickness intestinal samples as well as combined CSM and LSM layers, and not all of the studies investigated both the CSM and LSM contractile activity.
This study found increased in vitro contractility of the LSM with dexmedetomidine treatment, which conflicts with two in vivo studies that found decreased gut sounds following dexmedetomidine administration in horses [18,21]. This illustrates the fact that in vitro contractile activity does not necessarily translate to an increased motility in vivo. Regarding our results, this difference may be due to CSM playing a more dominant role than LSM in equine small intestinal motility, considering the relative thickness of CSM compared with LSM. Apart from the local effects of dexmedetomidine on the intestinal smooth muscle, its influence on other parts of the intestine or organs may also be of relevance for its ultimate effect on GI motility. The anti-inflammatory properties of dexmedetomidine may reduce the leukocytic inhibition on motility [28,30], and its reduction in ischaemia reperfusion-related injury of the mucosa [57,58] could indirectly ameliorate both the neurogenic and inflammatory inhibition of motility. Moreover, dexmedetomidine can alter the intestinal perfusion, with different authors reporting both improvement and deterioration of intestinal circulation [59,60,61]. Considering that pain is a significant motility inhibiting factor, the analgesic effects of α2 agonists may also be of significance in this matter [13,62]. Finally, there are many differences between the in vitro situation compared to in vivo that influence the extrapolation of the results, such as the migrating myoelectrical complex, luminal filling, intraluminal pressure, and an interaction between the intact muscle layers and the myenteric plexus [46,51,63,64].
A limitation of the study is the use of systemic dexmedetomidine during anaesthesia as premedication and as continuous rate infusion during anaesthesia. This was selected because it is considered unethical to induce general anaesthesia without proper premedication. The continuous rate infusion during the maintenance of anaesthesia was elected as part of the analgesic protocol and as isoflurane sparing anaesthetic management. Consequently, dexmedetomidine was elected to rule out the influence of any other anaesthetics. Any effect would be present in both groups and most likely be temporary, considering that rapid wash-out has been described in organ baths [65]. The measurement of dexmedetomidine levels in the intestinal tissue prior to the organ bath experiment or at the end of the in vitro experiment could have given more information on the relevance of this in vivo dexmedetomidine CRI. The administration of dexmedetomidine prior to ischaemia could have ameliorated the intestinal injury by pharmacological preconditioning, which could have influenced the effect of the ischaemia model [57]. On the other hand, it is unlikely that this affected the comparison of the treatment groups in the contractility measurements, considering this affect would be present in both groups. Furthermore, we confirmed the presence of significant intestinal injury during histological examination of these samples, as published elsewhere [66].
Comparing the in vitro applied concentration of dexmedetomidine with clinical doses, the dexmedetomidine plasma concentrations reached after commonly applied doses of 3.5–5 µ/kg are around 5 ng/mL [18,19], corresponding to approximately 25 nM. This is lower than the concentrations used in the current study, and thus represents another limitation of this work. For this in vitro study, a concentration was elected within the lower range of those previously described in in vitro studies in other species. Even though the investigated drug concentrations are not directly transferable to the clinical situation, the current observations serve as a first step in elucidating the mechanism of dexmedetomidine induced changes on the small intestinal contractility in horses. Further limitations of this study include the small sample size, the individual variation between the horses, and the relatively short reperfusion time.

5. Conclusions

The contractile activity of CSM was not affected by ischaemia, yet the LSM contractility increased following ischaemia and reperfusion. Dexmedetomidine inhibited the spontaneous contractile activity of CSM, whereas it stimulated that of LSM. This was not mediated by the enteric neurons, possibly indicating a direct effect on the smooth muscle cells. Dexmedetomidine also mildly increased the electrically induced contractile activity in LSM, which most likely indicates a differential distributionof the α-receptors between the two muscle layers. How the inhibitive effect on CSM and the excitatory effect on the LSM translate to motility in the clinical patient remains unclear, yet CSM may play a more dominant role in peristalsis due to its thickness in relation to that of LSM. Many other factors such as pain, inappetence, or the primary disease may also influence the final effect of dexmedetomidine on the case outcome. To fully comprehend the impact of dexmedetomidine on motility, investigations in perfused ex vivo models or in vivo techniques may be performed in future studies to clarify the many remaining questions. If dexmedetomidine could elicit a comparable stimulation of GI function as seen in man, this could offer an alternative to the commonly used GI inhibiting α2 agonists.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.V., S.K. and G.M.-W.; data curation, S.H. and K.H.; formal analysis, N.V. and S.H.; investigation, N.V., S.H., A.M.G., K.H. and S.N.; methodology, N.V., S.H., S.N., S.K. and G.M.-W.; resources, S.K. and G.M.-W.; supervision, S.K. and G.M.-W.; validation, S.K. and G.M.-W.; visualization, N.V. and S.H.; writing—original draft, N.V.; writing—review and editing, S.H., A.M.G., S.K. and G.M.-W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—491094227 “Open Access Publication Funding” and the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover Foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments of Lower Saxony, Germany (LAVES 33.8-42502-04-19/3240, 15 October 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in Mendeley Data under the following link http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/3hkh8v9mvv.1 (accessed on 2 March 2023).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the support of our colleagues from the clinic for horses during the experimental trial and preparation of the samples, and we would specifically like to thank Lara Twele for performing the anaesthesia of the horses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Holcombe, S.J.; Rodriguez, K.M.; Haupt, J.L.; Campbell, J.O.; Chaney, K.P.; Sparks, H.D.; Hauptman, J.G. Prevalence of and risk factors for postoperative ileus after small intestinal surgery in two hundred and thirty-three horses. Vet. Surg. 2009, 38, 368–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mair, T.; Smith, L. Survival and complication rates in 300 horses undergoing surgical treatment of colic. Part 2: Short-term complications. Equine Vet. J. 2005, 37, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Boorman, S.; Stefanovski, D.; Southwood, L.L. Clinical findings associated with development of postoperative reflux and short-term survival after small intestinal surgery in geriatric and mature nongeriatric horses. Vet. Surg. 2019, 48, 795–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Little, D.; Tomlinson, J.E.; Blikslager, A.T. Post operative neutrophilic inflammation in equine small intestine after manipulation and ischaemia. Equine Vet. J. 2005, 37, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lisowski, Z.M.; Pirie, R.S.; Blikslager, A.T.; Lefebvre, D.; Hume, D.A.; Hudson, N.P.H. An update on equine post-operative ileus: Definitions, pathophysiology and management. Equine Vet. J. 2018, 50, 292–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Boscan, P.; Van Hoogmoed, L.M.; Farver, T.B.; Snyder, J.R. Evaluation of the effects of the opioid agonist morphine on gastrointestinal tract function in horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2006, 67, 992–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cohen, N.D.; Lester, G.D.; Sanchez, L.C.; Merritt, A.M.; Roussel, A.J. Evaluation of risk factors associated with development of postoperative ileus in horses. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2004, 225, 1070–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hopster-Iversen, C.C.; Hopster, K.; Staszyk, C.; Rohn, K.; Freeman, D.E.; Rötting, A.K. Effects of experimental mechanical manipulations on local inflammation in the jejunum of horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2014, 75, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Adams, S.; Lamar, C.; Masty, J. Motility of the distal portion of the jejunum and pelvic flexure in ponies: Effects of six drugs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1984, 45, 795–799. [Google Scholar]
  10. Merritt, A.; Campbell-Thompson, M.; Lowrey, S. Effect of xylazine treatment on equine proximal gastrointestinal tract myoelectrical activity. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1989, 50, 945–949. [Google Scholar]
  11. Merritt, A.; Burrow, J.; Hartless, C. Effect of xylazine, detomidine, and a combination of xylazine and butorphanol on equine duodenal motility. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1998, 59, 619–623. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Lester, G.; Merritt, A.; Neuwirth, L.; Vetro-Widenhouse, T.; Steible, C.; Rice, B. Effect of alpha 2-adrenergic, cholinergic, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on myoelectric activity of ileum, cecum, and right ventral colon and on cecal emptying of radiolabeled markers in clinically normal ponies. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1998, 59, 320–327. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Elfenbein, J.R.; Sanchez, L.C.; Robertson, S.A.; Cole, C.A.; Sams, R. Effect of detomidine on visceral and somatic nociception and duodenal motility in conscious adult horses. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2009, 36, 162–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. de Vries, A.; Pakkanen, S.A.; Raekallio, M.R.; Ekiri, A.; Scheinin, M.; Taylor, P.M.; Vainio, O.M. Clinical effects and pharmacokinetic variables of romifidine and the peripheral α2-adrenoceptor antagonist MK-467 in horses. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2016, 43, 599–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Vainionpää, M.H.; Raekallio, M.R.; Pakkanen, S.A.; Ranta-Panula, V.; Rinne, V.M.; Scheinin, M.; Vainio, O.M. Plasma drug concentrations and clinical effects of a peripheral alpha-2-adrenoceptor antagonist, MK-467, in horses sedated with detomidine. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2013, 40, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zullian, C.; Menozzi, A.; Pozzoli, C.; Poli, E.; Bertini, S. Effects of α2-adrenergic drugs on small intestinal motility in the horse: An in vitro study. Vet. J. 2011, 187, 342–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tapio, H.; Raekallio, M.R.; Mykkänen, A.; Männikkö, S.; Scheinin, M.; Bennett, R.C.; Vainio, O. Effects of vatinoxan on cardiorespiratory function and gastrointestinal motility during constant-rate medetomidine infusion in standing horses. Equine Vet. J. 2019, 51, 646–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Rezende, M.; Grimsrud, K.N.; Stanley, S.D.; Steffey, E.; Mama, K. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous dexmedetomidine in the horse. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 2015, 38, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bettschart-Wolfensberger, R.; Freeman, S.; Bowen, I.; Aliabadi, F.; Weller, R.; Huhtinen, M.; Clarke, K. Cardiopulmonary effects and pharmacokinetics of iv dexmedetomidine in ponies. Equine Vet. J. 2005, 37, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bettschart-Wolfensberger, R.; Clarke, K.W.; Vainio, O.; Aliabadi, F.; Demuth, D. Pharmacokinetics of medetomidine in ponies and elaboration of a medetomidine infusion regime which provides a constant level of sedation. Res. Vet. Sci. 1999, 67, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abass, M.; Ibrahim, H.; Salci, H.; Hamed, M.A. Evaluation of the effect of different sedative doses of dexmedetomidine on the intestinal motility in clinically healthy donkeys (Equus asinus). BMC Vet. Res. 2022, 18, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Memis, D.; Dokmeci, D.; Karamanlioglu, B.; Turan, A.; Ture, M. A comparison of the effect on gastric emptying of propofol or dexmedetomidine in critically ill patients. Crit. Care 2005, 9, P374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, C.; Huang, P.; Lai, L.; Luo, C.; Ge, M.; Hei, Z.; Zhu, Q.; Zhou, S. Dexmedetomidine improves gastrointestinal motility after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer: A randomized clinical trial. Medicine 2016, 95, e4295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zeng, X.Z.; Lu, Z.F.; Lv, X.Q.; Guo, Y.P.; Cui, X.G. Epidural Co-Administration of Dexmedetomidine and Levobupivacaine Improves the Gastrointestinal Motility Function after Colonic Resection in Comparison to Co-Administration of Morphine and Levobupivacaine. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0146215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Shivaji, P.; Agrawal, S.; Kumar, A.; Bahadur, A. Evaluation of lignocaine, dexmedetomidine, lignocaine-dexmedetomidine infusion on pain and quality of recovery for robotic abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Braz. J. Anesthesiol. 2022, 72, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rekatsina, M.; Theodosopoulou, P.; Staikou, C. Effects of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Versus Lidocaine on Postoperative Pain, Analgesic Consumption and Functional Recovery After Abdominal Gynecological Surgery: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Double Blind Study. Pain Physician 2021, 24, E997–E1006. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Wu, Y.; Cai, Z.; Liu, L.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Kang, Y.; An, N. Impact of intravenous dexmedetomidine on gastrointestinal function recovery after laparoscopic hysteromyomectomy: A randomized clinical trial. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xiang, H.; Hu, B.; Li, Z.; Li, J. Dexmedetomidine controls systemic cytokine levels through the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. Inflammation 2014, 37, 1763–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sun, Y.; Gao, Q.; Wu, N.; Li, S.D.; Yao, J.X.; Fan, W.J. Protective effects of dexmedetomidine on intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Exp. Ther. Med. 2015, 10, 647–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Li, B.; Li, Y.; Tian, S.; Wang, H.; Wu, H.; Zhang, A.; Gao, C. Anti-inflammatory effects of perioperative dexmedetomidine administered as an adjunct to general anesthesia: A meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chang, H.; Cheng, B.; Miao, J.; Li, S.; Hu, H.; Huang, L.; Wang, Q. Inhibitory Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol on Gastrointestinal Tract Motility Involving Impaired Enteric Glia Ca(2+) Response in Mice. Neurochem. Res. 2021, 46, 1410–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chang, H.; Li, S.; Li, Y.; Hu, H.; Cheng, B.; Miao, J.; Gao, H.; Ma, H.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Q. Effect of sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol on gastrointestinal motility in lipopolysaccharide-induced endotoxemic mice. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020, 20, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Herbert, M.K.; Roth-Goldbrunner, S.; Holzer, P.; Roewer, N. Clonidine and dexmedetomidine potently inhibit peristalsis in the Guinea pig ileum in vitro. Anesthesiology 2002, 97, 1491–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Aydin, C.; Bagcivan, I.; Gursoy, S.; Altun, A.; Topcu, O.; Koyuncu, A. Altered spontaneous contractions of the ileum by anesthetic agents in rats exposed to peritonitis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2009, 15, 1620–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Iirola, T.; Vilo, S.; Aantaa, R.; Wendelin-Saarenhovi, M.; Neuvonen, P.; Scheinin, M.; Olkkola, K. Dexmedetomidine inhibits gastric emptying and oro-caecal transit in healthy volunteers. Br. J. Anaesth. 2011, 106, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Malone, E.D.; Brown, D.R.; Trent, A.M.; Turner, T.A. Influence of adrenergic and cholinergic mediators on the equine jejunum in vitro. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1996, 57, 884–890. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Guschlbauer, M.; Hoppe, S.; Geburek, F.; Feige, K.; Huber, K. In vitro effects of lidocaine on the contractility of equine jejunal smooth muscle challenged by ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Equine Vet. J. 2010, 42, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Malone, E.D.; Kannan, M.S. Effects of intestinal ischemia on in vitro activity of adjacent jejunum in samples obtained from ponies. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2001, 62, 1973–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Parlar, A.; Arslan, S.O. Resveratrol normalizes the deterioration of smooth muscle contractility after intestinal ischemia and reperfusion in rats associated with an antioxidative effect and modulating tumor necrosis factor alpha activity. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2019, 61, 416–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Angeles-López, G.E.; González-Trujano, M.E.; Déciga-Campos, M.; Ventura-Martínez, R. Neuroprotective evaluation of Tilia americana and Annona diversifolia in the neuronal damage induced by intestinal ischemia. Neurochem. Res. 2013, 38, 1632–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kurahashi, M.; Kito, Y.; Hara, M.; Takeyama, H.; Sanders, K.M.; Hashitani, H. Norepinephrine Has Dual Effects on Human Colonic Contractions Through Distinct Subtypes of Alpha 1 Adrenoceptors. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 10, 658–671.e651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Larauche, M.; Kiank, C.; Tache, Y. Corticotropin releasing factor signaling in colon and ileum: Regulation by stress and pathophysiological implications. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. Off. J. Pol. Physiol. Soc. 2009, 60 (Suppl. S7), 33–46. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mallesh, S.; Schneider, R.; Schneiker, B.; Lysson, M.; Efferz, P.; Lin, E.; de Jonge, W.J.; Wehner, S. Sympathetic Denervation Alters the Inflammatory Response of Resident Muscularis Macrophages upon Surgical Trauma and Ameliorates Postoperative Ileus in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Murray, A.; Pearson, G.; Cottrell, D. In vitro response to noradrenaline of small intestine taken from normal and grass sickness-affected horses. Vet. Res. Commun. 1997, 21, 571–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, L.; Coupar, I.M. Characterisation of pre-and post-synaptic α-adrenoceptors in modulation of the rat ileum longitudinal and circular muscle activities. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 1997, 356, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sarna, S.K. Gastrointestinal longitudinal muscle contractions. Am. J. Physiol. -Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 1993, 265, G156–G164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Traserra, S.; Villarte, S.; Traini, C.; Palacin, S.; Vergara, P.; Vannucchi, M.G.; Jimenez, M. The asymmetric innervation of the circular and longitudinal muscle of the mouse colon differently modulates myogenic slow phasic contractions. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. Off. J. Eur. Gastrointest. Motil. Soc. 2020, 32, e13778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Menozzi, A.; Pozzoli, C.; Poli, E.; Dacasto, M.; Giantin, M.; Lopparelli, R.; Passeri, B.; Zullian, C.; Gobbetti, T.; Bertini, S. Effects of nonselective and selective cyclooxygenase inhibitors on small intestinal motility in the horse. Res. Vet. Sci. 2009, 86, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Re, G.; Badino, P.; Odore, R.; Galaverna, D.; Girardi, C. Characterization of α-adrenoceptor subtypes in smooth muscle of equine ileum. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2001, 62, 1370–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ali, A.; Cheng, H.Y.; Ting, K.N.; Wilson, V.G. Rilmenidine reveals differences in the pharmacological characteristics of prejunctional alpha2-adrenoceptors in the guinea-pig, rat and pig. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1998, 125, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Hudson, N.; Mayhew, I.; Pearson, G. In vitro microelectrode study of the electrical properties of smooth muscle in equine ileum. Vet. Rec. 2001, 149, 707–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Jun, J.Y.; Choi, S.; Yeum, C.H.; Chang, I.Y.; Park, C.K.; Kim, M.Y.; Kong, I.D.; So, I.; Kim, K.W.; You, H.J. Noradrenaline inhibits pacemaker currents through stimulation of β1-adrenoceptors in cultured interstitial cells of Cajal from murine small intestine. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2004, 141, 670–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Colucci, R.; Blandizzi, C.; Carignani, D.; Placanica, G.; Lazzeri, G.; Del Tacca, M. Effects of imidazoline derivatives on cholinergic motility in guinea-pig ileum: Involvement of presynaptic alpha2-adrenoceptors or imidazoline receptors? Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 1998, 357, 682–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hieble, J.P.; Ruffolo Jr, R.R. Possible structural and functional relationships between imidazoline receptors and α2-adrenoceptors. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1995, 763, 8–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Colucci, R.; Blandizzi, C.; Carignani, D.; Lazzeri, G.; Natale, G.; Crema, F.; Del Tacca, M. Determination on functional basis of presynaptic alpha 2-adrenoceptor subtypes in guinea-pig duodenum. Neurosci. Lett. 1996, 210, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Scheibner, J.; Trendelenburg, A.U.; Hein, L.; Starke, K.; Blandizzi, C. Alpha 2-adrenoceptors in the enteric nervous system: A study in alpha 2A-adrenoceptor-deficient mice. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2002, 135, 697–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. König, K.S.; Verhaar, N.; Hopster, K.; Pfarrer, C.; Neudeck, S.; Rohn, K.; Kästner, S.B. Ischaemic preconditioning and pharmacological preconditioning with dexmedetomidine in an equine model of small intestinal ischaemia-reperfusion. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0224720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. VanderBroek, A.R.; Engiles, J.B.; Kästner, S.B.R.; Kopp, V.; Verhaar, N.; Hopster, K. Protective effects of dexmedetomidine on small intestinal ischaemia-reperfusion injury in horses. Equine Vet. J. 2021, 53, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hector, R.C.; Rezende, M.L.; Nelson, B.B.; Monnet, E. Cardiopulmonary function and intestinal blood flow in anaesthetised, experimentally endotoxaemic horses given a constant rate infusion of dexmedetomidine. Equine Vet. J. 2022, 54, 820–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hernández, G.; Tapia, P.; Alegría, L.; Soto, D.; Luengo, C.; Gomez, J.; Jarufe, N.; Achurra, P.; Rebolledo, R.; Bruhn, A. Effects of dexmedetomidine and esmolol on systemic hemodynamics and exogenous lactate clearance in early experimental septic shock. Crit. Care 2016, 20, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Wittenberg-Voges, L.; Kastner, S.B.; Raekallio, M.; Vainio, O.M.; Rohn, K.; Hopster, K. Effect of dexmedetomidine and xylazine followed by MK-467 on gastrointestinal microperfusion in anaesthetized horses. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2018, 45, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Risberg, A.; Spadavecchia, C.; Ranheim, B.; Krontveit, R.; Haga, H.A. Antinociceptive effects of three escalating dexmedetomidine and lignocaine constant rate infusions in conscious horses. Vet. J. 2014, 202, 489–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Melville, J.; Macagno, E.; Christensen, J. Longitudinal contractions in the duodenum: Their fluid-mechanical function. Am. J. Physiol. -Leg. Content 1975, 228, 1887–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Shafik, A.; Shafik, A.A.; Ahmed, I. Role of the longitudinal smooth muscle coat in the ileal motile activity: Evidence of ileo–ileal inhibitory reflex. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2002, 17, 1267–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Tappenbeck, K.; Hoppe, S.; Hopster, K.; Kietzmann, M.; Feige, K.; Huber, K. Lidocaine and structure-related mexiletine induce similar contractility-enhancing effects in ischaemia-reperfusion injured equine intestinal smooth muscle in vitro. Vet. J. 2013, 196, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Grages, A.M.; Verhaar, N.; Pfarrer, C.; Breves, G.; Burmester, M.; Neudeck, S.; Kästner, S. Low Flow versus No Flow: Ischaemia Reperfusion Injury Following Different Experimental Models in the Equine Small Intestine. Animals 2022, 12, 2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Animals 13 01021 g001 550
Figure 1. Diagram depicting the timing of the experiment on day 1 including the original traces of representative samples of circular and longitudinally oriented jejunal smooth muscle strips (CSM and LSM, respectively) with and without dexmedetomidine (Dexmed) addition. The oval shaded areas represent the induced contractile activity following electrical field stimulation (EFS) at t65 and t110. The rectangular shaded areas represent the basal contractile activity at t75–80 and t105–110 (additional t~85 for LSM Dexmed).
Figure 1. Diagram depicting the timing of the experiment on day 1 including the original traces of representative samples of circular and longitudinally oriented jejunal smooth muscle strips (CSM and LSM, respectively) with and without dexmedetomidine (Dexmed) addition. The oval shaded areas represent the induced contractile activity following electrical field stimulation (EFS) at t65 and t110. The rectangular shaded areas represent the basal contractile activity at t75–80 and t105–110 (additional t~85 for LSM Dexmed).
Animals 13 01021 g001
Animals 13 01021 g002 550
Figure 2. Box plot diagram of the basal contractile activity of jejunal circular smooth muscle (CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) of 12 horses during pre-ischaemia (P), ischaemia (I), and reperfusion (R) at t75–80 in the organ bath. Significant differences between the ischaemia phases (repeated measures ANOVA) are marked with an asterisk (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001). The horizontal bar displays the median and the plus is the mean, the interquartile range is represented by the box and the minimum and maximum by the whisker plots. MAF is the mean active force.
Figure 2. Box plot diagram of the basal contractile activity of jejunal circular smooth muscle (CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) of 12 horses during pre-ischaemia (P), ischaemia (I), and reperfusion (R) at t75–80 in the organ bath. Significant differences between the ischaemia phases (repeated measures ANOVA) are marked with an asterisk (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001). The horizontal bar displays the median and the plus is the mean, the interquartile range is represented by the box and the minimum and maximum by the whisker plots. MAF is the mean active force.
Animals 13 01021 g002
Animals 13 01021 g003 550
Figure 3. Box plot diagram of the basal contractile activity of jejunal circular smooth muscle (CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) of 12 horses during pre-ischaemia (P), ischaemia (I), and reperfusion (R) at different time points t75–80 and t105–110 during the organ bath experiment. Significant differences between the time points (paired two tailed t-test) are marked with an asterisk (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001). The horizontal bar displays the median and the plus is the mean, the interquartile range is represented by the box and the minimum and maximum by the whisker plots. MAF is the mean active force.
Figure 3. Box plot diagram of the basal contractile activity of jejunal circular smooth muscle (CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) of 12 horses during pre-ischaemia (P), ischaemia (I), and reperfusion (R) at different time points t75–80 and t105–110 during the organ bath experiment. Significant differences between the time points (paired two tailed t-test) are marked with an asterisk (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001). The horizontal bar displays the median and the plus is the mean, the interquartile range is represented by the box and the minimum and maximum by the whisker plots. MAF is the mean active force.
Animals 13 01021 g003
Animals 13 01021 g004 550
Figure 4. Box plot diagram of the basal contractile activity of jejunal circular smooth muscle (CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) with and without the addition of dexmedetomidine (Dexmed) during pre-ischaemia (P), ischaemia (I), and reperfusion (R) at t105–110. Significant differences between the control group and the Dexmed-treated group (two sampled t-test) are marked with an asterisk (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01). The horizontal bar displays the median and the plus is the mean, the interquartile range is represented by the box and the minimum and maximum by the whisker plots. MAF is the mean active force.
Figure 4. Box plot diagram of the basal contractile activity of jejunal circular smooth muscle (CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) with and without the addition of dexmedetomidine (Dexmed) during pre-ischaemia (P), ischaemia (I), and reperfusion (R) at t105–110. Significant differences between the control group and the Dexmed-treated group (two sampled t-test) are marked with an asterisk (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01). The horizontal bar displays the median and the plus is the mean, the interquartile range is represented by the box and the minimum and maximum by the whisker plots. MAF is the mean active force.
Animals 13 01021 g004
Animals 13 01021 g005 550
Figure 5. Box plot diagram of the nerve mediated contractile activity of the jejunal circular smooth muscle (CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) of 12 horses during pre-ischaemia (P), ischaemia (I), and reperfusion (R) at t65. Significant differences between the ischaemia phases (repeated measures ANOVA) are marked with an asterisk (* p < 0.05). The horizontal bar displays the median and the plus is the mean, the interquartile range is represented by the box and the minimum and maximum by the whisker plots.
Figure 5. Box plot diagram of the nerve mediated contractile activity of the jejunal circular smooth muscle (CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) of 12 horses during pre-ischaemia (P), ischaemia (I), and reperfusion (R) at t65. Significant differences between the ischaemia phases (repeated measures ANOVA) are marked with an asterisk (* p < 0.05). The horizontal bar displays the median and the plus is the mean, the interquartile range is represented by the box and the minimum and maximum by the whisker plots.
Animals 13 01021 g005
Animals 13 01021 g006 550
Figure 6. Box plot diagram of the nerve mediated contractile activity of jejunal circular smooth muscle (CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) of 12 horses during pre-ischaemia (P), ischaemia (I), and reperfusion (R) at t65. Significant differences between the time points (paired t-test) are marked with an asterisk (** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001). The horizontal bar displays the median and the plus is the mean, the interquartile range is represented by the box and the minimum and maximum by the whisker plots.
Figure 6. Box plot diagram of the nerve mediated contractile activity of jejunal circular smooth muscle (CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) of 12 horses during pre-ischaemia (P), ischaemia (I), and reperfusion (R) at t65. Significant differences between the time points (paired t-test) are marked with an asterisk (** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001). The horizontal bar displays the median and the plus is the mean, the interquartile range is represented by the box and the minimum and maximum by the whisker plots.
Animals 13 01021 g006
Animals 13 01021 g007 550
Figure 7. Box plot diagram of the nerve mediated contractile activity of jejunal circular smooth muscle (CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) during pre-ischaemia (P), ischaemia (I), and reperfusion (R) at t110 with and without the addition of dexmedetomidine (Dexmed). Significant differences between the control group and the Dexmed-treated group (two sample t-test) are marked with an asterisk (* p < 0.05). The horizontal bar displays the median and the plus is the mean, the interquartile range is represented by the box and the minimum and maximum by the whisker plots.
Figure 7. Box plot diagram of the nerve mediated contractile activity of jejunal circular smooth muscle (CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) during pre-ischaemia (P), ischaemia (I), and reperfusion (R) at t110 with and without the addition of dexmedetomidine (Dexmed). Significant differences between the control group and the Dexmed-treated group (two sample t-test) are marked with an asterisk (* p < 0.05). The horizontal bar displays the median and the plus is the mean, the interquartile range is represented by the box and the minimum and maximum by the whisker plots.
Animals 13 01021 g007
Animals 13 01021 g008 550
Figure 8. Box plot diagram of the basal contractile activity of jejunal circular smooth muscle (CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) during pre-ischaemia at time point t110 in the organ bath experiment, following treatment with dexmedetomidine (Dexmed), with and without the addition of tetrodotoxin (TTX). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups (two sample t-test). The horizontal bar displays the median and the plus is the mean, the interquartile range is represented by the box and the minimum and maximum by the whisker plots. MAF is the mean active force.
Figure 8. Box plot diagram of the basal contractile activity of jejunal circular smooth muscle (CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) during pre-ischaemia at time point t110 in the organ bath experiment, following treatment with dexmedetomidine (Dexmed), with and without the addition of tetrodotoxin (TTX). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups (two sample t-test). The horizontal bar displays the median and the plus is the mean, the interquartile range is represented by the box and the minimum and maximum by the whisker plots. MAF is the mean active force.
Animals 13 01021 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Verhaar, N.; Hoppe, S.; Grages, A.M.; Hansen, K.; Neudeck, S.; Kästner, S.; Mazzuoli-Weber, G. Dexmedetomidine Has Differential Effects on the Contractility of Equine Jejunal Smooth Muscle Layers In Vitro. Animals 2023, 13, 1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13061021

AMA Style

Verhaar N, Hoppe S, Grages AM, Hansen K, Neudeck S, Kästner S, Mazzuoli-Weber G. Dexmedetomidine Has Differential Effects on the Contractility of Equine Jejunal Smooth Muscle Layers In Vitro. Animals. 2023; 13(6):1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13061021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Verhaar, Nicole, Susanne Hoppe, Anna Marei Grages, Kathrin Hansen, Stephan Neudeck, Sabine Kästner, and Gemma Mazzuoli-Weber. 2023. "Dexmedetomidine Has Differential Effects on the Contractility of Equine Jejunal Smooth Muscle Layers In Vitro" Animals 13, no. 6: 1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13061021

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop