Next Article in Journal
Cross Sectional Anatomy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Juvenile Atlantic Puffin Head (Aves, Alcidae, Fratercula arctica)
Next Article in Special Issue
Communities of Uropodina (Acari: Mesostigmata) in Nest Boxes Inhabited by Dormice (Glis glis and Muscardinus avellanarius) and Differences in Percentages of Nidicoles in Nests of Various Hosts
Previous Article in Journal
Mapping Subchondral Bone Density Distribution in the Canine C6-C7 Vertebral Endplates: A CT-OAM Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tenuipalpus Sensu Lato Donnadieu (Acari: Prostigmata: Tenuipalpidae); New Species Groups, a New Species, and Keys to the World Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Different Host Plants on Life Type Characteristics of Three Spider Mite Pests (Acari: Prostigmata: Tetranychidae)

by
Hafiz Muhammad Saqib Mushtaq
,
Hafiz Muhammad Sajid Ali
,
Muhammad Kamran
and
Fahad Jaber Alatawi
*
Department of Plant Protection, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(22), 3433; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13223433
Submission received: 4 October 2023 / Revised: 1 November 2023 / Accepted: 3 November 2023 / Published: 7 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Ecology, Evolution, Systematics and Behaviour of Mites)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Some spider mite species are economically important agricultural pests, attacking both annual and perennial host plants. They usually produce silken threads of varying densities on the surface of the leaves of inhabiting plants to perform various biological/behavioral activities. In the present study, field-collected leaf samples and laboratory-infested leaves were used to evaluate the effect of different plants on the web-associated behavioral characteristics (life type) of three spider mite species, namely, Tetranychus urticae, Eutetranychus orientalis, and Eutetranychus palmatus. Both annual and perennial plants for T. urticae and only perennial plants for E. orientalis and E. palmatus were used. Two spider mites, E. orientalis and E. palmatus, showed persistence in life type characteristics on different plant species. In contrast, some behavioral characteristics of T. urticae varied by changing the host plants. Although T. urticae showed variations in some behavioral characteristics, it did not change its life type, which shows its high adaptability to utilizing the host plant resources. The variations observed in the life type characteristics of T. urticae could be helpful in applied pest management.

Abstract

The present study evaluated the host plant effect on life type characteristics of three important spider mite pest species, Tetranychus urticae Koch, Eutetranychus orientalis (Klein), and E. palmatus Attiah (Acari: Prostigmata: Tetranychidae), based on both field and laboratory observations. The polyphagous species, T. urticae with complicated web (CW-u) life type, occupying unstable habitats, showed variations in the sites for quiescence (SQ), sites for oviposition (SO), sites for defecation (SD), and webbing density (WD) on different annual/perennial host plants. The SQ, SO, and SD of T. urticae were observed either on the leaf, web threads, or trichomes. Tetranychus urticae constructed the lowest WD on tomato plants and the highest WD on maize/mulberry plants. Two spider mite species of the genus Eutetranychus Banks, the polyphagous E. orientalis and the oligophagous E. palmatus, inhabit stable host plants, depicted in the little web (LW-j) life types with persistency in all characteristics on different plants. It is concluded that polyphagous spider mites have restricted their life types, showing their high adaptability to utilize the resources of different host plants for survival with slight variation in some important life type characteristics.

1. Introduction

Spider mites belonging to the family Tetranychidae Donnadieu (Acari: Prostigmata: Tetranychidae) inhabit various annual and perennial host plants [1]. Some members of the subfamily Tetranychinae Berlese are notorious agricultural pests [2,3] and usually produce silken web threads of varying densities and complexities [4,5,6]. Such web structures serve various biological purposes and represent an adaptation for the mite survival on the inhabited host plants [6].
The webbing structures and associated behavioral characteristics of spider mite species on the surface of host plants are technically termed “life types”, and are mainly categorized as little web (LW), complicated web (CW), and woven nest (WN) [4,5]. Further, these three main life types are subdivided into various subtypes based on persistent differences in associated characteristics [4,5]. Among different life type characteristics, the type of the host plant inhabited by the spider mite species is also considered the defining characteristic of a subtype [4].
The idea of classifying spider mites based on their life types was initially proposed over 40 years ago, and numerous studies on the peculiarities of these life types have since been documented [7,8,9]. The life types of different spider mite species belonging to different genera of Tetranychidae have been studied so far [4,5,10,11,12,13,14]. Among them, members of the genera Tetranychus Dufour and Eutetranychus Banks are severe threats to many different economic host plants [3]. The two spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch and the citrus brown mite Eutetranychus orientalis (Klein), are polyphagous in feeding habits with CW-u and LW-j life types, respectively [4,5]. The oligophagous species, Eutetranychus palmatus Attiah, has been reported from two plant families of Arecacea and Malvaceae [14] and is considered a pest of date palm [15]; however, its life type still remains unexplored and needs to be studied.
The “type” of the life type of a spider mite species could depend on its feeding habit (oligophagous or polyphagous) and the type of host plant (annual or perennial) inhabited [4,5,6]. It has been argued that the spider mite species infesting annual host plants (unstable habitat) tend to have a fixed life type and mites infesting perennial host plants (stable habitat) exhibit a different life type [4]. Therefore, this study was designed to assess the life type characteristics of two polyphagous spider mite pests, T. urticae and E. orientalis, feeding on different host plant (annual and perennial) leaves. Also, the life type of the oligophagous pest E. palmatus was characterized for the first time.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection Sites and Mite Rearing

The populations of Tetranychus urticae, Eutetranychus orientalis, and E. palmatus were collected from infested leaves of Solanum melongena L., (Solanaceae), Citrus sp. (Rutaceae), and Washingtonia filifera (Lindl.) (Arecaceae) plants grown within the vicinity of the King Saud University (KSU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (SA), respectively, between 2020 and 2021. In addition, a small colony of each spider mite species was reared separately by making leaf arenas of their respective host plants, based on the rearing methods of Mirza et al. [9], with slight modifications. Only the size (3.5–4.5 × 4.5–5.5 cm2) and shape (either rectangular or circular) of mites-rearing arenas were modified due to the differences in leaf morphology of respective host plants. All spider mite cultures were kept in a climate-controlled growth chamber (Binder, Tuttlingen, Germany) and maintained at 28 ± 2 °C, 35 ± 10% RH, and L14: D10 photoperiod throughout the experimental duration.

2.2. Spider Mites’ Identification

The specimens of each tested spider mite species were mounted on glass slides in Hoyer’s medium under the SZX10 stereomicroscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). In addition, these specimens were taxonomically identified as species using a BX51 fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with the help of the published taxonomic literature [16,17,18]. Finally, the voucher specimens of each identified/tested species were preserved in the Acarology section of the King Saud University Museum of Arthropods, Riyadh, SA.

2.3. Experimental Procedure to Study the Annual and Perennial Host Plants’ Effect on Life Type Characteristics of Polyphagous/Oligophagous Spider Mite Pests in the Laboratory

The experiment was conducted in the Biological Control Laboratory, Department of Plant Protection, KSU, during 2020–2021. The life type characteristics of (a) T. urticae were examined on six (four annual and two perennial) host plants, Capsicum annum L., S. melongena, S. lycopersicum L., (Solanaceae), Morus alba L. (Moraceae), Zea mays L. (Poaceae), and Ziziphus jujuba L. (Rhamnaceae); (b) E. orientalis was examined on three perennial plants, Citrus sp., Ricinus communis L. (Euphorbiaceae), and Z. jujube; and (c) E. palmatus was examined on two perennial plants, Phoenix dactylifera L. and W. filifera (Arecaceae). Each treatment (=host plant) was replicated 10 times. The life type characteristics of tested spider mite species were studied on the leaf arenas of size (3.5–4.5 × 4.5–5.5 cm2) prepared with the leaves of host plant species mentioned above following Mirza et al. [12], in a climate-controlled chamber at (28 ± 2 °C, 35 ± 5% RH, and L14: D10 photoperiod).
In the laboratory experiments, the newly matured females along with conspecific males were released, separately for each of three tested spider mite species, viz., T. urticae, E. orientalis, and E. palmatus, into their respective experimental arenas. After 3 to 4 days, the mated/gravid females were then used in the experiment. Mites were released near leaf-midrib with the help of a fine camel hairbrush. The life type characteristics of (a) T. urticae were examined on six (four annual and two perennial) host plants, Capsicum annum L., S. melongena, S. lycopersicum L., (Solanaceae), Morus alba L. (Moraceae), Zea mays L. (Poaceae), and Ziziphus jujuba L. (Rhamnaceae); (b) E. orientalis was examined on three perennial plants, Citrus sp., Ricinus communis L. (Euphorbiaceae), and Z. jujube; and (c) E. palmatus was examined on two perennial plants, Phoenix dactylifera L. and W. filifera (Arecaceae). The experimental arenas were set according to the size (3.5–4.5 × 4.5–5.5 cm2) and shape (either rectangular or circular) of each respective plant leaf. Each treatment (=host plant) was replicated 10 times. The experimental arenas were kept in a climate-controlled growth chamber for 10 days and maintained at 28 ± 2 °C, 35 ± 5% RH, and L14: D10 photoperiod. To ensure the establishment of spider mite colonies, all experimental arenas were observed after the 3rd day of mite release under an M165 C Stereomicroscope (LEICA, Wetzlar, Germany). However, the final observational data were recorded on the 10th day of mite release. Due to the biological activities (e.g., feeding and defecation) of spider mites, when time passed, leaf color was slightly changed (green to pale yellow) in some experimental arenas. The leaf side (adaxial or abaxial) of each host plant leaf for each tested spider mite species was selected based on the leaf side of natural infestation. The life type characteristics of T. urticae and E. orientalis were evaluated on the adaxial leaf sides of all tested host plants, whereas E. palmatus was assessed on adaxial and abaxial sides of P. dactylifera and W. filifera, respectively.

2.4. Observations of Life Type Characteristics on Field-Infested Leaf Samples

The leaf samples of the following mentioned plant species infested naturally with T. urticae, E. orientalis, and E. palmatus were collected from the field and brought to the laboratory. The life type characteristics of the spider mite pest (a) T. urticae on five (four annual and one perennial) host plants, C. annum, S. melongena, S. lycopersicum, Z. mays, and Z. jujuba; (b) E. orientalis on three perennial plants, Citrus sp., R. communis, and Z. jujuba; and (c) E. palmatus on a perennial host plant, W. filifera, were observed from these naturally infested leaf samples collected from the field under stereomicroscope in the laboratory, grown within the vicinity of KSU. As compared to the laboratory tests, the life type characteristics of T. urticae and E. palmatus could not observed on the field-infested leaves of M. alba and P. dactylifera due to the unavailability of natural infestation, respectively. Randomly, five leaves (=replicates) were collected from each host plant, preserved separately in polyethylene bags, and brought to the Acarology and Biological Control R&D Labs., College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, KSU. Each spider mite species on each host plant leaf was examined under a stereomicroscope to investigate its life type characteristics.

2.5. Data Reading and Statistical Analysis

A total of 10 characteristics of spider mite life type were observed, i.e., host plant type (HP; annual, perennial, etc.), leaf side (LS; upper, lower, etc.) inhabited, webbing structure (WS) and density (WD), sites for oviposition (SO), defecation (SD), and quiescence (SQ), spinning during walking (SW), site for feeding and walking (SFW), and egg cover (EC; guy ropes, dense web, etc.) produced by females.
Following Mushtaq et al. [10], the observed life type characteristics for each spider mite species were comparatively investigated on different host plant leaves, and the obtained results were expressed in percentages. Each examined life type characteristic was considered and recorded as 10% and 20% per replicate in the laboratory and field observations, respectively. Moreover, the observational data were separated into supposed ranks (1–6, as in Table S1) for statistical analysis. Additionally, photographs related to observations on some life type characteristics were captured using an Olympus Microscope Camera (DP72) attached to a stereomicroscope. The ranked data (Table S1) were statistically analyzed either through the Kruskal–Wallis test and Wilcoxon two-sample test (Mann–Whitney U-test), and mean scores were ranked by Wilcoxon rank-sums test using the SAS computer program v.9.4 [19].
The webbing density on field-collected and laboratory-infested leaves was quantified by using the methodology adopted by Sabelis [20] and Lemos et al. [21], with slight modifications, i.e., five different webbing density levels: no webbing (0%), low webbing (1–25%), medium webbing (26–50%), high webbing (51–75%), and extremely high webbing (76–100%) were proposed based on differences in obtained WD percentages (Table S1). To quantify the webbing density (%), a white sheet with a 1 cm2 hole was placed over the infested leaf. An accurately measured quantity of 3 mg sand was sprinkled through a 1 cm2 hole on the web surface. Some of the sand particles were passed through the silken strands of the web and landed on the leaf, while some adhered to the web threads. The webbing density (WD) was calculated by using the following equation.
Webbing density (WD) % = SW/TSP × 100
whereas
SW = Sand particles adhere on/within web threads.
TSP = Total number of sand particles (SW + SL).
SL = Sand particles on the leaf surface, do not adhere to web threads.

3. Results

3.1. Life Type Characteristics of Tetranychus urticae on Some Annual and Perennial Host Plant Leaves

The results confirmed that the polyphagous spider mite species T. urticae did not change its life type (CW-u) either on four annual (unstable habitat) or two perennial (stable habitat) host plant leaves. Some behavioral characteristics, i.e., WS, EC, SFW, and SW, of T. urticae remained persistent on tested annual/perennial plant leaves in laboratory experiments and on field-collected leaves samples (Table 1 and Table 2). However, the SQ, SO, SD, and WD were found to be variable (Table 1 and Table 2; Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). In laboratory experiments, four life type characteristics, i.e., SQ (H = 38.268), SO (H = 49.820), SD (H = 56.420), and WD (H = 39.826) (all df = 5, p < 0.05) of T. urticae showed significant differences among six tested host plant leaves (Table 3). The SQ was significantly different in S. melongena (vs. Z. mays, M. alba, S. lycopersicum), C. annum (vs. Z. mays, M. alba, S. lycopersicum), Z. mays (vs. Z. jujuba), and M. alba (vs. Z. jujuba) (Table 3). The SO was significantly different in S. melongena (vs. C. annum, Z. mays, M. alba, S. lycopersicum, Z. jujuba), C. annum (vs. Z. mays, S. lycopersicum, Z. jujuba; Table), Z. mays (vs. M. alba), and M. alba (vs. S. lycopersicum, Z. jujuba) (Table 3). The SD was significantly different in S. melongena (vs. C. annum, Z. mays, M. alba, S. lycopersicum, Z. jujuba) and C. annum (vs. Z. mays, M. alba, S. lycopersicum, Z. jujuba (Table 3). The WD was significantly different in S. melongena (vs. C. annum, S. lycopersicum), C. annum (vs. Z. mays, M. alba, S. lycopersicum, Z. jujuba; Table 3), Z. mays (vs. S. lycopersicum), M. alba (vs. S. lycopersicum), and S. lycopersicum (vs. Z. jujuba) (Table 3).
Similarly, the field observations also showed significant differences in SQ (H = 23.073), SO (H = 23.073), SD (H = 23.073), and WD (H = 20.947) (all df = 4, p < 0.05) of T. urticae among five (four annual and one perennial) tested host plants (Table 4). The SQ, SO, and SD were significantly different in S. melongena (vs. C. annum, Z. mays, S. lycopersicum, Z. jujuba), C. annum (vs. Z. mays, S. lycopersicum, Z. jujuba), and Z. mays (vs. S. lycopersicum, Z. jujuba) (Table 4), whereas the WD was significantly different in S. melongena (vs. C. annum, Z. mays, S. lycopersicum), C. annum (vs. S. lycopersicum, Z. jujuba), Z. mays (vs. S. lycopersicum, Z. jujuba), and S. lycopersicum (vs. Z. jujuba) (Table 4).

3.2. Life Type Characteristics of Eutetranychus orientalis

The results revealed that life type behavioral characteristics of polyphagous E. orientalis remained persistent on tested perennial plants, both in the laboratory and in field observations (Table 1 and Table 2). The life type of E. orientalis also did not change on different perennial plants.

3.3. Life Type Characteristics of Eutetranychus palmatus

The life type characteristics of E. palmatus were investigated for the first time in the present study, and its life type also remained the same on two perennial host plants. It was observed that all the behavioral characteristics of E. palmatus remained persistent both in the laboratory and in field observations (Table 1 and Table 2).
In the laboratory and field observations, mobile stages of E. palmatus neither spun a web while walking on the leaf surface nor showed dragging behavior. The quiescent stages/exuviae, eggs, and feces were consistently observed on the leaf surface (Figure 4), near to or away from the leaf midrib. The female of E. palmatus constructed egg covers as dense webs (Figure 4b) and showed weaving behavior. Females, males, nymphs, and larvae were randomly observed during feeding, walking, and resting on the leaf surface near to or away from the midrib. Eutetranychus palmatus showed an LW life type and LW-j subtype based on the observed behavioral characteristics on the leaves of P. dactylifera and W. filifera.

4. Discussion

In the present study, the host plant effect was assessed on the life type characteristics of three spider mite pests, T. urticae, E. orientalis, and E. palmatus. The four life type characteristics, i.e., site for quiescence (SQ), site for oviposition (SO), site for defecation (SD), and webbing density (WD) of T. urticae were observed either on the leaf surface, web threads, or trichomes and varied within and between different host plants (annual and perennial) (Table 1 and Table 2, Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). The life type characteristics of T. urticae were not previously studied regarding the annual type of host plants. However, the CW-u life type was determined for T. urticae on Sambucus sieboldiana (perennial), where the preferred SQ, SO, and SD were on threads of an irregularly complicated web [4]. Such variations in the life type characteristics could be due to the change in the microhabitat, leaf structure (glabrous or pubescence), and mite population density [4,10,22].
Tetranychus urticae is a polyphagous pest with >1100 annual and perennial hosts [14,15]. Although Saito [4] indicated that polyphagous mite species inhabiting annual and perennial host plants exhibit fixed and diverse life type, respectively. In contrast, T. urticae showed significant variations in the SQ, SO, SD, and WD on different annual and perennial plant leaves in the present study (Table 1 and Table 2, Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). Similarly, an oligophagous species, Oligonychus afrasiaticus (McGregor) having CW-d life type, showed variations in SO and SQ when tested on annual (Sorghum bicolor (Poaceae)) and perennial (Saccharum officinarum L. (Poaceae)) host plants without changing their life type [13]. It has been reported that some polyphagous spider mite pests change their life type on perennial plants [4,11,22]. For example, Eotetranychus tilliarium (Hermann) showed the CW-r life type on the hairy leaves of Alnus hirsuta Turcaz. (Betulaceae), and the WN-t life type on glabrous leaves of A. japonica Steud [4]. Likewise, E. asiaticus Ehara changed its life type characteristics on two different perennial plants by depicting the WN-t life type on strawberry leaves [23], and the CW-g life type when inhabiting the galls created by an insect species, Trioza cinnamomi (Boselli) (Hemiptera: Triozidae) on leaves of Cinnamomum japonicum Siebold (Laureacea) [11].
The amount of webbing (WD, an essential characteristic of CW-life type) produced by T. urticae was reported to be affected due to changes in environmental conditions, host plants inhabited, and mite population density [23,24,25]. In the present study, the WD of T. urticae varied on annual host plants from low (on tomato) to extremely high (e.g., on brinjal) (Table 1 and Table 2). On the other hand, the WD range was high to extremely high on the tested perennial plants. Similarly, T. urticae showed variations in the amount of web deposition when tested on seven perennial host plants, i.e., Algerian ivy, bean, cotton, castor bean, hibiscus, rose, and sweet potato [26,27]. These variations in the WD of T. urticae are probably due to the differences in the physical structure of the leaves of tested host plants. Because leaf depressions (e.g., along leaf midribs) play a crucial role as the basis for the construction of complicated web structures, females of T. urticae showed aggregation behavior near such depressions [6].
In the present study, two congeneric spider mite pests, the polyphagous E. orientalis (>200 hosts) and the oligophagous E. palmatus (six hosts) [14], did not show variations/differences in any life type characteristics on different perennial host plants (Table 1 and Table 2). The life type of E. palmatus (LW-j) was investigated for the first time in this study. Previously, the LW-j life type was also detected for E. orientalis on the leaves of a perennial plant, Manihot glaziovii Müll. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae) [10]. In the present study, these two Eutetranychus species showed persistency in life type characteristics on different perennial host plant leaves. It could be due to the fact that LW is the primary and simplest life type [4,6], and is observed in less advanced Tetranychinae genera, e.g., Aponychus Rimando, Eurytetranychus Oudemans, Eutetranychus Banks, Panonychus Yokoyama, Stylophoronychus Prasad, and Yezonychus Ehara [4]. The members (e.g., E. orientalis and E. palmatus) of the tribe Eurytetranychini Reck are considered more primitive than the members (e.g., T. urticae and Oligonychus spp.) of the tribe Tetranychini Reck [6]. It could be one of the reasons why, in the LW-j life type of E. orientalis and E. palmatus, pest species never spin threads as dense webs while walking on the leaf surface (dragging behavior), but females produce dense web covers on eggs (weaving behavior) to protect their progeny [28,29,30,31,32].

5. Conclusions

It is concluded that the tested spider mites have restricted life types with variations in some life type characteristics, which shows their high adaptability to utilize the host plant resources. The variations observed in the life type characteristics of T. urticae could be helpful in applied pest management (e.g., in the proper selection of potential biological control agents) when infesting various economic plants.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani13223433/s1, Table S1: Coding for statistical analysis of laboratory and field observations of life type characteristics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.M.S.M.; methodology, H.M.S.M. and H.M.S.A.; validation, M.K. and F.J.A.; formal analysis, H.M.S.M., H.M.S.A., F.J.A. and M.K.; investigation, H.M.S.M., H.M.S.A. and F.J.A.; data curation, H.M.S.M. and H.M.S.A.; writing—original draft preparation, H.M.S.M.; writing—review and editing, M.K. and F.J.A.; supervision, F.J.A.; funding acquisition, F.J.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the researchers supporting project number (RSPD2023R807), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All necessary data for the manuscript is provided.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Jawwad Hassan Mirza (Department of Plant Protection, King Saud University) for editing and reviewing the manuscript with his constructive and useful comments that greatly improved it. Special thanks are given to Muhammad Waleed Shakoor and Nasreldeen Ahmed Elgoni (Department of Plant Protection, King Saud University) for their help in the experimentation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bolland, H.R.; Gutierrez, J.; Flechtmann, C.H.W. World Catalogue of the Spider Mite Family (Acari: Tetranychidae); Brill Academic Publishers: Leiden, The Netherlands, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jeppson, L.R.; Keifer, H.H.; Baker, E.W. Mites Injurious to Economic Plants; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hoy, M.A. Agricultural Acarology. Introduction to Integrated Mite Management; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  4. Saito, Y. The concept of ‘life types’ in Tetranychinae. An attempt to classify the spinning behavior of Tetranychinae. Acarologia 1983, 24, 377–391. [Google Scholar]
  5. Saito, Y. Life types of spider mites. In Spider Mites: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, 1st ed.; Helle, W., Sabelis, W., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1985; Volume 1A, pp. 253–264. [Google Scholar]
  6. Saito, Y. Plant Mites and Sociality. Diversity and Evolution; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  7. Aponte, O.; McMurtry, J.A. Damage on ‘Hass’ avocado leaves, webbing and nest behaviour of Oligonychus perseae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1997, 21, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mori, K.; Saito, Y.; Sakagami, T. Effects of the nest web and female attendance on survival of young in a subsocial spider mite, Schizotetranychus longus (Acari: Tetranychidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1999, 23, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oku, K.; Yano, S.; Takafuji, A. Spider mite’s use of a refuge during the quiescent stage in the presence of a predator. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2003, 108, 71–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Saito, Y. Sociobiological aspects of spider mite life types. J. Acarol. Soc. Jpn. 1995, 4, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saito, Y.; Lin, J.Z.; Zhang, Y.X.; Ito, K.; Liu, Q.Y.; Chittenden, A.R. Two new species and four new life types in Tetranychidae. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2016, 109, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mirza, J.H.; Kamran, M.; Alatawi, F.J. Webbing life type and behavioral response of the date palm mite, Oligonychus afrasiaticus, to webbing residues on leaves and fruits of date palm. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2018, 76, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mushtaq, H.M.S.; Kamran, M.; Alatawi, F.J. Two new life types and assessment of web-associated behavioral characteristics of some Oligonychus species on various host plants. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2021, 83, 211–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Spider Mites Web: A Comprehensive Database for the Tetranychidae. Available online: http://www1.montpellier.inra.fr/CBGP/spmweb (accessed on 17 August 2023).
  15. Zélé, F.; Altıntaş, M.; Santos, I.; Cakmak, I.; Magalhães, S. Inter-and intraspecific variation of spider mite susceptibility to fungal infections: Implications for the long-term success of biological control. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 3209–3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Palevsky, E.; Lotan, A.; Gerson, U. Evaluation of Eutetranychus palmatus (acari: Tetranychidae) as a pest of date palms in Israel. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 2010, 58, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alatawi, F.J.; Kamran, M. Spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) of Saudi Arabia: Two new species, new records and a key to all known species. J. Nat. Hist. 2018, 52, 429–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kamran, M.; Khan, E.M.; Alatawi, F.J. The spider mites of the genus Eutetranychus BBanks (Acari, Trombidiformes, Tetranychidae) from saudi arabia: Two new species, a re-description, and a key to the world species. ZooKeys 2018, 799, 47–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Krantz, G.W. A Manual of Acarology, 2nd ed.; Oregon State University Book Stores, Inc.: Corvallis, OR, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  20. Der, G.; Everitt, B.S. A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using Sas, 3rd ed.; Chapman and Hall/CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sabelis, M.W. Biological Control of Two-Spotted Spider Mites Using Phytoseiid Predators. Part I. Pudoc. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lemos, F.; Sarmento, R.A.; Pallini, A.; Dias, C.R.; Sabelis, M.W.; Janssen, A. Spider mite web mediates anti-predator behaviour. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2010, 52, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Oloo, G.W.; Ogol, C.K.; Kambona, K.O. Biotaxonomy of cassava green spider mites, Mononychellus spp. (Tetranychidae): ‘Life type’ as a possible biological criterion for their identification. Int. J. Trop. Insect. Sci. 1987, 8, 995–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Osakabe, M.H. Which predatory mite can control both a dominant mite pest, Tetranychus urticae, and a latent mite pest, Eotetranychus asiaticus, on strawberry? Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2002, 26, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hazan, A.; Gerson, U.; Tahori, A.S. Spider mite webbing. I. The production of webbing under various environmental conditions. Acarologia 1974, 16, 68–84. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gerson, U.; Aronowitz, A. Spider mite webbing. V. The effect of various host plants. Acarologia 1981, 22, 277–281. [Google Scholar]
  27. Osakabe, M.H.; Hongo, K.; Funayama, K.; Osumi, S. Amensalism via webs causes unidirectional shifts of dominance in spider mite communities. Oecologia 2006, 150, 496–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sato, Y.; Saito, Y. Nest sanitation in social spider mites: Interspecific differences in defecation behavior. Ethology 2006, 112, 664–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shimoda, T.; Kishimoto, H.; Takabayashi, J.; Amano, H.; Dicke, M. Comparison of thread-cutting behavior in three specialist predatory mites to cope with complex webs of Tetranychus spider mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2009, 47, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sabelis, M.W.; Bakker, F.M. How predatory mites cope with the web of their Tetranychid prey—A functional view on dorsal chaetotaxy in the Phytoseiidae. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1992, 16, 203–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yano, J.; Saito, Y.; Chittenden, A.R.; Sato, Y. Variation in counterattack success against a phytoseiid predator between two forms of the social spider mite Stigmaeopsis miscanthi. J. Ethol. 2011, 29, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yano, S. Cooperative web sharing against predators promotes group living in spider mites. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2012, 66, 845–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Variations were observed in site for quiescence (SQ) shown by Tetranychus urticae on the adaxial leaf sides of different (annual and perennial) host plant leaves (Solanum melongena, Capsicum annum, Zea mays, Morus alba, S. lycopersicum, and Ziziphus jujuba) in the laboratory and/or field observations. S. melongena: SQ on (a) leaf, (b) web, and (c) trichome; C. annum: on (d) leaf and (e) web; Z. mays: on (f) leaf and (g) web; M. alba: on (h) leaf and (i) web; S. lycopersicum: on (j) leaf and (k) web; and Z. jujuba: on (l) leaf and (m) web.
Figure 1. Variations were observed in site for quiescence (SQ) shown by Tetranychus urticae on the adaxial leaf sides of different (annual and perennial) host plant leaves (Solanum melongena, Capsicum annum, Zea mays, Morus alba, S. lycopersicum, and Ziziphus jujuba) in the laboratory and/or field observations. S. melongena: SQ on (a) leaf, (b) web, and (c) trichome; C. annum: on (d) leaf and (e) web; Z. mays: on (f) leaf and (g) web; M. alba: on (h) leaf and (i) web; S. lycopersicum: on (j) leaf and (k) web; and Z. jujuba: on (l) leaf and (m) web.
Animals 13 03433 g001
Figure 2. Variations were observed in the site for oviposition (SO) exhibited by Tetranychus urticae on the adaxial leaf sides of different (annual and perennial) host plant leaves (Solanum melongena, Capsicum annum, Zea mays, Morus alba, S. lycopersicum, and Ziziphus jujuba) in the laboratory and field observations. S. melongena: SO on (a) leaf, (b) web, and (c) trichome; C. annum: on (d) leaf and web; Z. mays: on (e) leaf and (f) web; M. alba: on (g) leaf and (h) web; S. lycopersicum: on (i) leaf and (j) web; and Z. jujuba: on (k) leaf and (l) web.
Figure 2. Variations were observed in the site for oviposition (SO) exhibited by Tetranychus urticae on the adaxial leaf sides of different (annual and perennial) host plant leaves (Solanum melongena, Capsicum annum, Zea mays, Morus alba, S. lycopersicum, and Ziziphus jujuba) in the laboratory and field observations. S. melongena: SO on (a) leaf, (b) web, and (c) trichome; C. annum: on (d) leaf and web; Z. mays: on (e) leaf and (f) web; M. alba: on (g) leaf and (h) web; S. lycopersicum: on (i) leaf and (j) web; and Z. jujuba: on (k) leaf and (l) web.
Animals 13 03433 g002
Figure 3. Variations were observed in the site for defecation (SD) shown by Tetranychus urticae on the adaxial leaf sides of different (annual and perennial) host plant leaves (Solanum melongena, Capsicum annum, Zea mays, Morus alba, S. lycopersicum, and Ziziphus jujuba) in the laboratory and field observations. S. melongena: SD on (a) leaf, (b) web, and (c) trichome; C. annum: on (d) leaf and (e) web; Z. mays: on (f) leaf and (g) web; M. alba: on (h) leaf and (i) web; S. lycopersicum: on (j) leaf and (k) web; and Z. jujuba: on (l) leaf and (m) web.
Figure 3. Variations were observed in the site for defecation (SD) shown by Tetranychus urticae on the adaxial leaf sides of different (annual and perennial) host plant leaves (Solanum melongena, Capsicum annum, Zea mays, Morus alba, S. lycopersicum, and Ziziphus jujuba) in the laboratory and field observations. S. melongena: SD on (a) leaf, (b) web, and (c) trichome; C. annum: on (d) leaf and (e) web; Z. mays: on (f) leaf and (g) web; M. alba: on (h) leaf and (i) web; S. lycopersicum: on (j) leaf and (k) web; and Z. jujuba: on (l) leaf and (m) web.
Animals 13 03433 g003
Figure 4. Some important life type (LW-j) characteristics of Eutetranychus palmatus on the adaxial and abaxial leaf sides of P. dactylifera and W. filifera (perennial) were observed in field and laboratory observations. (a) Feces on the leaf surface; (b) egg covers as dense web; (c) quiescence stage on the leaf surface.
Figure 4. Some important life type (LW-j) characteristics of Eutetranychus palmatus on the adaxial and abaxial leaf sides of P. dactylifera and W. filifera (perennial) were observed in field and laboratory observations. (a) Feces on the leaf surface; (b) egg covers as dense web; (c) quiescence stage on the leaf surface.
Animals 13 03433 g004
Table 1. Differences and variations (estimated in %) were observed in some important life type characteristics of Tetranychus urticae, Eutetranychus orientalis, and E. palmatus on adaxial or abaxial leaf sides of different host plants under laboratory conditions.
Table 1. Differences and variations (estimated in %) were observed in some important life type characteristics of Tetranychus urticae, Eutetranychus orientalis, and E. palmatus on adaxial or abaxial leaf sides of different host plants under laboratory conditions.
Spider Mite
Species
Host PlantsHost Plant Type
(HP)
No. of Obs.
(N)
Life Type Characteristics
Site for Quiescence (SQ) %Site for Oviposition (SO) %Site for Defecation (SD) %Webbing Density (WD) %
WLWLWTTWTLWLWLWTTWTLWLWLWTTWTLNWLWMWHWEHW
T. urticaeSolanum melongenaAnnual100100000000000100000001000004060
Capsicum annumAnnual1001000000010000000100000001080100
Zea maysAnnual1000100000001000000010000000102070
Morus albaPerennial1000100000070300000010000000102070
S. lycopersicumAnnual100208000002080000010900000100000
Ziziphus jujubaPerennial103020500000010000000100000010104040
E. orientalisRicinus communisPerennial100100000001000000010000001000000
Citrus sp.Perennial100100000001000000010000001000000
Z. jujubaPerennial100100000001000000010000001000000
E. palmatusPhoenix dactyliferaPerennial100100000001000000010000001000000
Washingtonia filiferaPerennial100100000001000000010000001000000
W = on/within web threads, L = on leaf surface, WL = on/within web threads and on leaf surface, WT = on/within web threads and on trichrome, T = on trichrome, WTL = on/within web threads, on trichrome and on leaf surface, NW = no webbing, LW = low webbing, MW = moderate webbing, HW = high webbing, EHW = extremely high webbing.
Table 2. Differences and variations (estimated in %) were observed in some important life type characteristics of Tetranychus urticae, Eutetranychus orientalis, and E. palmatus on adaxial or abaxial sides of field-infested leaves of different host plants.
Table 2. Differences and variations (estimated in %) were observed in some important life type characteristics of Tetranychus urticae, Eutetranychus orientalis, and E. palmatus on adaxial or abaxial sides of field-infested leaves of different host plants.
Spider Mite SpeciesHost PlantsHost Plant Type
(HP)
No. of Obs.
(N)
Life Type Characteristics
Site for Quiescence (SQ) %Site for Oviposition (SO) %Site for Defecation (SD) %Webbing Density (WD) %
WLWLWTTWTLWLWLWTTWTLWLWLWTTWTLNWLWMWHWEHW
T. urticaeSolanum melongenaAnnual50000010000000100000100000000100
Capsicum annumAnnual51000000010000000100000000040600
Zea maysAnnual50802000008020000080200000060400
S. lycopersicumAnnual50010000000100000001000000100000
Ziziphus jujubaPerennial50010000000100000001000000004060
E. orientalisRicinus communisPerennial50100000001000000010000001000000
Citrus sp.Perennial50100000001000000010000001000000
Z. jujubaPerennial50100000001000000010000001000000
E. palmatusWashingtonia filiferaPerennial50100000001000000010000001000000
W = on/within web threads, L = on leaf surface, WL = on/within web threads and on leaf surface, WT = on/within web threads and on trichrome, T = on trichrome, WTL = on/within web threads, on trichrome and Pl on leaf surface, NW = no webbing, LW = low webbing, MW = moderate webbing, HW = high webbing, EHW = extremely high webbing.
Table 3. Wilcoxon two-sample test results of host plants’ effect on some important life type characteristics (SQ, SO, SD, and WD) of Tetranychus urticae on adaxial leaf sides of different host plants in the laboratory.
Table 3. Wilcoxon two-sample test results of host plants’ effect on some important life type characteristics (SQ, SO, SD, and WD) of Tetranychus urticae on adaxial leaf sides of different host plants in the laboratory.
Host Plants ComparisonSite for Quiescence (SQ)Site for Defecation (SO)Site for Oviposition (SD)Webbing Density (WD)
UDFpUDFpUDFpUDFp
Solanum melongena vs. Capsicum annum0.00011.000019.0001<0.000119.0001<0.000114.70210.0001
S. melongena vs. Zea mays19.0001<0.000119.0001<0.000119.0001<0.00010.07410.7864
S. melongena vs. Morus alba19.0001<0.000117.1951<0.000119.0001<0.00010.07410.7864
S. melongena vs. S. lycopersicum12.66710.000417.5931<0.000118.1821<0.000116.9641<0.0001
S. melongena vs. Zizipus jujuba0.74510.388019.0001<0.000119.0001<0.00011.37810.2404
C. annum vs. Z. mays19.0001<0.000119.0001<0.000119.0001<0.000112.79410.0003
C. annum vs. M. alba19.0001<0.00013.35310.067119.0001<0.000112.79410.0003
C. annum vs. S. lycopersicum12.66710.000412.66710.000415.5461<0.000115.00010.0001
C. annum vs. Z. jujuba0.74510.388019.0001<0.000119.0001<0.00017.23410.0072
Z. may vs. M. alba0.00011.000010.23110.00140.00011.00000.00011.0000
Z. may vs. S. lycopersicum2.11110.14622.11110.14621.00010.317317.1481<0.0001
Z. may vs. Z. jujuba6.20910.01270.00011.00000.00011.00001.70010.1923
M. alba vs. S. lycopersicum0.14612.11114.79810.02851.00010.317317.1481<0.0001
M. alba vs. Z. jujuba6.20910.012710.23110.00140.00011.00001.70010.1923
S. lycopersicum vs. Z. jujuba2.58710.10782.11110.14621.00010.317314.11910.0002
Table 4. Wilcoxon two-sample test results of host plants’ effect on some important life type characteristics (SQ, SO, SD, and WD) of Tetranychus urticae on adaxial leaf sides of field-infested leaves of different host plants.
Table 4. Wilcoxon two-sample test results of host plants’ effect on some important life type characteristics (SQ, SO, SD, and WD) of Tetranychus urticae on adaxial leaf sides of field-infested leaves of different host plants.
Host Plants ComparisonSite for Quiescence (SQ)Site for Oviposition (SO)Site for Defecation (SD)Webbing Density (WD)
UDFpUDFpUDFpUDFp
Solanum melongena vs. Capsicum annum9.00010.0039.00010.0039.00010.0038.03610.005
S. melongena vs. Zea mays8.33310.0048.33310.0048.33310.0048.03610.005
S. melongena vs. S. lycopersicum9.00010.0039.00010.0039.00010.0039.00010.003
S. melongena vs. Zizipus jujuba9.00010.0039.00010.0039.00010.0032.25010.134
C. annum vs. Z. mays8.33310.0048.33310.0048.33310.0040.36010.549
C. annum vs. S. lycopersicum9.00010.0039.00010.0039.00010.0038.03610.005
C. annum vs. Z. jujuba9.00010.0039.00010.0039.00010.0034.64110.031
Z. may vs. S. lycopersicum6.00010.0146.00010.0146.00010.0148.03610.005
Z. may vs. Z. jujuba6.00010.0146.00010.0146.00010.0145.40010.020
S. lycopersicum vs. Z. jujuba0.00011.0000.00011.0000.00011.0008.03610.005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mushtaq, H.M.S.; Ali, H.M.S.; Kamran, M.; Alatawi, F.J. Effect of Different Host Plants on Life Type Characteristics of Three Spider Mite Pests (Acari: Prostigmata: Tetranychidae). Animals 2023, 13, 3433. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13223433

AMA Style

Mushtaq HMS, Ali HMS, Kamran M, Alatawi FJ. Effect of Different Host Plants on Life Type Characteristics of Three Spider Mite Pests (Acari: Prostigmata: Tetranychidae). Animals. 2023; 13(22):3433. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13223433

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mushtaq, Hafiz Muhammad Saqib, Hafiz Muhammad Sajid Ali, Muhammad Kamran, and Fahad Jaber Alatawi. 2023. "Effect of Different Host Plants on Life Type Characteristics of Three Spider Mite Pests (Acari: Prostigmata: Tetranychidae)" Animals 13, no. 22: 3433. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13223433

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop