Next Article in Journal
On the Development of a Wearable Animal Monitor
Previous Article in Journal
Association of Leopard Cat Occurrence with Environmental Factors in Chungnam Province, South Korea
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

First Molecular Detection of Bartonella bovis and Bartonella schoenbuchensis in European Bison (Bison bonasus)

by
Algimantas Paulauskas
*,
Irma Ražanskė
,
Indrė Lipatova
,
Loreta Griciuvienė
,
Asta Aleksandravičienė
,
Artūras Kibiša
,
Dalia Černevičienė
and
Jana Radzijevskaja
Faculty of Natural Sciences, Vytautas Magnus University, K. Donelaičio 58, LT-44248 Kaunas, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(1), 121; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13010121
Submission received: 28 November 2022 / Revised: 20 December 2022 / Accepted: 27 December 2022 / Published: 28 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Wildlife)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The European bison is the largest ruminant in Europe. The population of European bison in Lithuania is increasing and several free-ranging herds exist. Owing to their protected status, studies of vector-borne pathogens in European bison are still lacking. By analyzing European bison and ticks collected from them in Lithuania, we checked for the presence of Bartonella spp. and found a low frequency (7.9%) of positive animals. This study showed that European bison may be infected by at least two Bartonella species, namely B. bovis and B. schoenbuchensis. Our results demonstrated that further research is needed to determine the distribution of Bartonella species in wild and domestic ruminants, and it is important to identify the transmission route.

Abstract

Bartonella bacteria infect the erythrocytes and endothelial cells of mammalians. The spread of the Bartonella infection occurs mainly via bloodsucking arthropod vectors. Studies on Bartonella infection in European bison, the largest wild ruminant in Europe, are lacking. They are needed to clarify their role in the maintenance and transmission of Bartonella spp. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of the Bartonella pathogen in European bison and their ticks in Lithuania. A total of 38 spleen samples from bison and 258 ticks belonging to the Ixodes ricinus and Dermacentor reticulatus species were examined. The bison and tick samples were subjected to ssrA, 16S–23S rRNA ITS, gltA, and rpoB partial gene fragment amplification using various variants of PCR. Bartonella DNA was detected in 7.9% of the tissue samples of European bison. All tick samples were negative for Bartonella spp. The phylogenetic analysis of 16S–23S rRNA ITS, gltA, and rpoB partial gene fragment revealed that European bison were infected by B. bovis (2.6%) and B. schoenbuchensis (5.3%). This is the first report addressing the occurrence of B. bovis and B. schoenbuchensis in European bison in Europe.

1. Introduction

Bartonella species are Gram-negative bacteria that infect mammalian erythrocytes and endothelial cells. They are transmitted via direct contact (scratches or bites by infected animals) and by bloodsucking arthropod vectors such as fleas, lice, ticks, sand flies, and deer keds [1,2]. Domestic and wild ruminants can be hosts for Bartonella bovis, Bartonella capreoli, Bartonella chomelii, Bartonella schoenbuchensis, and Bartonella melophagi [3,4,5,6]. In addition, Bartonella henselae and ‘Candidatus Bartonella davousti’ have been detected in domestic cattle [7,8]. Bartonella species detected in ruminants are rarely implicated in animal diseases. To date, only B. bovis has been associated with bovine endocarditis [4,6,9].
In Lithuania, various species of Bartonella have been detected in domestic and wild animals and their ectoparasites. Bartonella grahamii, B. tailorii, B. rochalimae, B. tribocorum, B. coopersplainsensis, B. doshiae, and B. washoensis have been identified in several species of small rodents and in the fleas, ticks or mites collected from them [10,11,12,13]. Furthermore, B. henselae, B. clarridgeiae and the Bartonella sp., closely related to B. schoenbuchensis have been detected in domestic cats and their fleas [14]. However, there is no data on the presence of Bartonella pathogens in domestic or wild ruminants in Lithuania.
The European bison (Bison bonasus), the largest ruminant in Europe, is known for its status as an animal under species protection. Recent studies have demonstrated that bison may play a role as a natural reservoir of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Babesia divergens, and Babesia venatorum [15,16]. However, there is no information about Bartonella infection in European bison in Europe. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the presence of the Bartonella pathogen in European bison and their ticks (Ixodes ricinus and Dermacentor reticulatus) in Lithuania using real-time PCR targeting the ssrA gene, and to characterize Bartonella strains by the PCR and sequence analysis of the 16S–23S rRNA ITS (the 16S–23S rRNA intergenic species region), gltA (citrate synthase gene) and rpoB (RNA polymerase β-subunit) genes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collecting

A total of 38 spleen samples of European bison (21 males and 17 females) were collected in the period 2019 to 2022 in Central and Northern Lithuania (Kėdainiai and Panevėžys regions). Bison samples were collected in all seasons (n = 4 spring, n = 1 summer, n = 11 autumn, and n = 22 winter). Due to the status of animals under species protection, the tissue samples of European bison were taken from animals found dead in the field (n = 6), accidentally killed on roads (n = 10), and eliminated from nature under a protection plan due to diseases or genetic disorders (n = 22). The bison sampling was conducted with permission from the Environmental Protection Department under the Ministry of Environment (permit No. AAA 2019-04-01 use protected species No. 12, in accordance with the protection plan for Bison bonasus L.). A total of 258 ticks were collected from 6 animals that had died due to unknown causes. Ticks were placed in 1.5 mL tubes with 70% ethanol and kept at 4 °C until investigation. Tick species were identified based on morphological criteria [17]. Two species of ticks were identified: Ixodes ricinus (40 male, 88 female, and 1 nymph) and Dermacentor reticulatus (95 male, 34 female). A total of 116 ticks were engorged (85 I. ricinus and 31 D. reticulatus) and 143 non-engorged (45 I. ricinus and 98 D. reticulatus).

2.2. DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification

Genomic DNA was extracted from bison spleens and engorged ticks using a Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. DNA from non-engorged ticks was extracted using 2.5% ammonium hydroxide [18].
Screening for the presence of Bartonella DNA (124 bp product of ssrA gene) was conducted by using TaqMan real-time PCR with ssrA-F1 and ssrA-R1 primers and a ssrA-P1 probe, as previously described [11]. Bartonella-positive samples in real-time PCR were further analyzed using nested PCR assays that amplify partial sequences of the 16S–23S rRNA ITS region (external primers WITS-F and WITS-R; internal primers Bh311–332F and ITS-R) and conventional PCR assays of gltA (primers BhCS.781p and BhCS.1137n) and rpoB (primers 1400 F and 2300 R) genes [19,20,21,22] (Table S1). Positive (DNA of Bartonella-infected rodents, confirmed by sequencing) and negative (sterile, double-distilled water) controls were included in each PCR run. PCR products were identified by electrophoresis on 1.5 % agarose gel.

2.3. DNA Sequencing and Sequence Analysis

PCR products of all Bartonella-positive samples were extracted from agarose gel and purified using the GeneJET™ Gel Extraction Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania). The obtained partial 16S–23S rRNA ITS region, gltA, and rpoB gene sequences were analyzed using the MegaX software package [23] and were aligned with the previously published sequences in GenBank using BLASTn. The phylogenetic trees were constructed using the maximum-likelihood method and Tamura-Nei model.
Partial 16S–23S rRNA ITS region, gltA, and rpoB gene sequences for representative samples obtained in this study were submitted to the GenBank database under accession numbers OP888096 for the ITS region, OP894362–OP894364 for the gltA gene, and OP894359–OP894361 for the rpoB gene.

3. Results

3.1. Frequency of Bartonella Infection

Bartonella DNA was detected in three out of the thirty-eight (7.9%) tissue samples of European bison. Positive results were obtained in each animal when applying all three PCR techniques (real-time PCR, and conventional and nested PCR). The Bartonella infection was detected in samples collected during winter. All ticks (n = 258) collected from the six European bison specimens not infected with Bartonella were negative for Bartonella spp. All positive samples were subjected to sequence analysis.

3.2. 16. S–23S rRNA ITS Region

Only one sample of European bison demonstrated the partial 16S–23S rRNA ITS fragment. The obtained sequence (GenBank: OP888096) was 100% identical to B. bovis sequences isolated from domestic cattle from France, Guatemala, and Israel (GenBank: KF218230, KF218232, KM371094) (Figure 1).

3.3. gltA Gene

In total, three gltA partial gene fragments were obtained from three European bison samples. The sequence analysis revealed that the Bartonella strain (GenBank: OP894362) derived from one individual European bison clustered with B. bovis isolated from cattle from various countries (GenBank: KJ909846, MN615927, JX094278) with an identity score 100%. The other two sequences (GenBank: OP894363, OP894364) demonstrated a 100% similarity with B. schoenbuchensis isolated from roe deer (GenBank: AJ278183, CP019789, FN645507), deer ked from Germany (GenBank: AJ564632), and a human sample from France (GenBank: HG977196) (Figure 2).

3.4. rpoB Gene

The rpoB gene sequence (GenBank: OP894361) clustered with other B. bovis sequences. The highest similarity (99.9%) was shared with B. bovis, previously isolated from cattle from France (GenBank: KF218217). Meanwhile, two sequences derived from two bison specimens (GenBank: OP894659, OP894360) were 99.1% similar to the B. schoenbuchensis sequences isolated from roe deer from Germany (GenBank: CP019789) and human (GenBank: HG977196), differing at six nucleotide positions (Figure 3). Additionally, these sequences shared a 98.5% similarity with B. capreoli isolated from red deer from USA (GenBank: HM167505), differing at fifteen nucleotide positions.

4. Discussion

This study reports the first molecular detection of B. bovis and B. schoenbuchensis in European bison in Europe. Furthermore, we tested I. ricinus and D. reticulatus ticks collected from bison and did not detect the presence of Bartonella species. The role of ticks in the transmission of Bartonella is not fully understood [4,6]. Other vectors such as deer ked and other fly species may be involved in the transmission of Bartonella spp. in ruminants [6,24].
Bartonella bovis is mainly detected in cattle. Infection with B. bovis is usually asymptomatic, but it is known that it can be associated with bovine endocarditis [4,9]. The prevalence of B. bovis in domestic cattle ranges from 7% to 36% in Europe and from 5% to 90% in other continents [4,6,25,26,27]. Furthermore, B. bovis infections also have been reported in wild ruminants such as moose, red deer, and roe deer [28,29]. A recent study reported that B. bovis DNA has been identified in 3.2% of ticks collected from cattle [6]. Meanwhile, in our study, Bartonella infection in ticks has not been detected. This study presents a low frequency of B. bovis (2.6%) in European bison in Lithuania. A previous study conducted in Poland has shown that 6.8% of cattle (Bos taurus), a closely related species to European bison, had asymptomatic B. bovis infection [26]. In order to estimate the prevalence of Bartonella in Lithuanian ruminants, an epidemiological study with a larger sample size is needed.
The present study revealed that two individuals of European bison (5.3%) were infected with B. schoenbuchensis. This result is not unexpected because previous studies reported cases of B. schoenbuchensis in domestic and wild ruminants from Georgia, Poland, France, and Norway [4,28,30,31]. Moreover, this species was determined in the deer keds collected from wild ruminants [31,32]. According to other studies, Bartonella spp. highly similar to B. capreoli, B. chomelii, and B. schoenbuchensis had been identified in deer ked distribution areas [29,31,33]. That indicates a potential role of deer ked for the transmission of Bartonella species. Furthermore, outside the deer ked distribution area, other vectors such as ticks or culicoides biting midges could also be involved in Bartonella transmission [29,34]. European bison are gregarious animals that live and travel in herds. Such a lifestyle provides a possibility for blood-sucking vectors to have a greater effect on the transmission of the diseases [35].

5. Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that European bison may be infected by at least two Bartonella species, namely B. bovis and B. schoenbuchensis. Further research is needed to determine the vectors of transmission of Bartonella species among bison and other ruminant species.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani13010121/s1, Table S1: Detailed PCR protocols for Bartonella spp. detection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P., I.R. and J.R.; methodology, I.R., I.L., L.G., A.A. and D.Č.; software, I.R.; formal analysis, I.R., I.L., L.G., A.A. and J.R.; investigation, I.R., I.L., L.G., A.A. and D.Č.; resources, A.P. and A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, I.R., I.L. and L.G.; writing—review and editing, A.P., I.R., I.L., L.G., A.A., A.K., D.Č. and J.R.; funding acquisition, A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Part of this research was funded by the European Regional Development Fund, project number 05.5.1-APVA-V-018-01-0006.

Institutional Review Board Statement

European bison sampling was conducted with permission from the Environmental Protection Department under the Ministry of Environment (permit No. AAA 2019-04-01 use protected species No. 12, in accordance with the protection plan for Bison bonasus L.).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tsai, Y.-L.; Chang, C.-C.; Chuang, S.-T.; Chomel, B.B. Bartonella species and their ectoparasites: Selective host adaptation or strain selection between the vector and the mammalian host? Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2011, 34, 299–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Breitschwerdt, E.B. Bartonellosis, One Health and all creatures great and small. Vet. Dermatol. 2017, 28, 96-e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bai, Y.; Cross, P.; Malania, L.; Kosoy, M. Isolation of Bartonella capreoli from elk. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 148, 329–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bai, Y.; Malania, L.; Castillo, D.A.; Morán, D.; Boonmar, S.; Chanlun, A.; Suksawat, F.; Maruyama, S.; Knobel, D.; Kosoy, M. Global distribution of Bartonella infections in domestic bovine and characterization of Bartonella bovis strains using multi-locus sequence typing. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kosoy, M.; Bai, Y.; Enscore, R.; Rizzo, M.R.; Bender, S.; Popov, V.; Albayrak, L.; Fofanov, Y.; Chomel, B. Bartonella melophagi in blood of domestic sheep (Ovis aries) and sheep keds (Melophagus ovinus) from the southwestern US: Cultures, genetic characterization, and ecological connections. Vet. Microbiol. 2016, 190, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Boularias, G.; Azzag, N.; Gandoin, C.; Bouillin, C.; Chomel, B.; Haddad, N.; Boulouis, H. Bartonella bovis and Bartonella chomelii infection in dairy cattle and their ectoparasites in Algeria. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 70, 101450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gutiérrez, R.; Cohen, L.; Morick, D.; Mumcuoglu, K.Y.; Harrus, S.; Gottlieb, Y. Identification of different Bartonella species in the cattle tail louse (Haematopinus quadripertusus) and in cattle blood. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 5477–5483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Dahmani, M.; Sambou, M.; Scandola, P.; Raoult, D.; Fenollar, F.; Mediannikov, O. Bartonella bovis and Candidatus Bartonella davousti in cattle from Senegal. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 50, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Maillard, R.; Petit, E.; Chomel, B.; Lacroux, C.; Schelcher, F.; Vayssier-Taussat, M.; Haddad, N.; Boulouis, H.-J. Endocarditis in cattle caused by Bartonella bovis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2007, 13, 1383–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lipatova, I.; Paulauskas, A.; Puraite, I.; Radzijevskaja, J.; Balciauskas, L.; Gedminas, V. Bartonella infection in small mammals and their ectoparasites in Lithuania. Microbes Infect. 2015, 17, 884–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mardosaitė-Busaitienė, D.; Radzijevskaja, J.; Balčiauskas, L.; Bratchikov, M.; Jurgelevičius, V.; Paulauskas, A. Prevalence and diversity of Bartonella species in small rodents from coastal and continental areas. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 12349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Lipatova, I.; Razanske, I.; Jurgelevicius, V.; Paulauskas, A. Bartonella washoensis infection in red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) and their ectoparasites in Lithuania. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 68, 101391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kaminskienė, E.; Paulauskas, A.; Balčiauskas, L.; Radzijevskaja, J. Bartonella spp. detection in laelapid (Mesostigmata: Lael-apidae) mites collected from small rodents in Lithuania. J. Vector. Ecol. 2022, 47, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Razgūnaitė, M.; Lipatova, I.; Paulauskas, A.; Karvelienė, B.; Riškevičienė, V.; Radzijevskaja, J. Bartonella Infections in Cats and Cat Fleas in Lithuania. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Paulauskas, A.; Aleksandravičienė, A.; Lipatova, I.; Griciuvienė, L.; Kibiša, A.; Žukauskienė, J.; Radzijevskaja, J. Molecular detection of Babesia spp. in European bison (Bison bonasus) and their ticks. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2021, 12, 101807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Myczka, A.W.; Kaczor, S.; Filip-Hutsch, K.; Czopowicz, M.; Plis-Kuprianowicz, E.; Laskowski, Z. Prevalence and genotyping of Anaplasma phagocytophilum strains from wild animals, European bison (Bison bonasus) and Eurasian moose (Alces alces) in Poland. Animals 2022, 12, 1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Estrada-Peña, A.; Mihalca, A.D.; Petney, T.N. Ticks of Europe and North Africa: A Guide to Species Identification, 1st ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; p. 404. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rijpkema, S.; Golubić, D.; Molkenboer, M.; Verbeek-De Kruif, N.; Schellekens, J. Identification of four genomic groups of Bor-relia burgdorferi sensu lato in Ixodes ricinus ticks collected in a Lyme borreliosis endemic region of northern Croatia. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1996, 20, 23–30. [Google Scholar]
  19. Norman, A.F.; Regnery, R.; Jameson, P.; Greene, C.; Krause, D.C. Differentiation of Bartonella-like isolates at the species level by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism in the citrate synthase gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1995, 33, 1797–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Renesto, P.; Gouvernet, J.; Drancourt, M.; Roux, V.; Raoult, D. Use of rpoB Gene Analysis for Detection and Identification of Bartonella Species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 430–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Jensen, W.A.; Fall, M.Z.; Rooney, J.; Kordick, D.L.; Breitschwerdt, E.B. Rapid Identification and Differentiation of Bartonella Species Using a Single-Step PCR Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 1717–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kaewmongkol, G.; Kaewmongkol, S.; Burmej, H.; Bennett, M.D.; Fleming, P.A.; Adams, P.J.; Wayne, A.F.; Ryan, U.; Irwin, P.J.; Fenwick, S.G. Diversity of Bartonella species detected in arthropod vectors from animals in Australia. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2011, 34, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chung, C.Y.; Kasten, R.W.; Paff, S.M.; Van Horn, B.A.; Vayssier-Taussat, M.; Boulouis, H.-J.; Chomel, B.B. Bartonella spp. DNA Associated with Biting Flies from California. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2004, 10, 1311–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bermond, D.; Boulouis, H.-J.; Heller, R.; Van Laere, G.; Monteil, H.; Chomel, B.B.; Sander, A.; Dehio, C.; Piémont, Y. Bartonella bovis bermond et al. sp. nov. and Bartonella capreoli sp. nov., isolated from European ruminants. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2002, 52, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Welc-Falęciak, R.; Grono, K. The first cases of Bartonella bovis infection in cattle from Central Europe. Vet. Microbiol. 2013, 162, 954–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kho, K.-L.; Koh, F.-X.; Jaafar, T.; Nizam, Q.N.H.; Tay, S.-T. Prevalence and molecular heterogeneity of Bartonella bovis in cattle and Haemaphysalis bispinosa ticks in Peninsular Malaysia. BMC Veter-Res. 2015, 11, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Adamska, M. Wild ruminants in the area of the North-Western Poland as potential reservoir hosts of Bartonella schoenbuchensis and B. bovis. Acta Parasitol. 2008, 53, 407–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sacristán, C.; das Neves, C.G.; Suhel, F.; Sacristán, I.; Tengs, T.; Hamnes, I.S.; Madslien, K. Bartonella spp. detection in ticks, Culicoides biting midges and wild cervids from Norway. Transbound Emerg. Dis. 2021, 68, 941–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rolain, J.M.; Rousset, E.; Scola, B.; Duquesnel, R.; Raoult, D. Bartonella schoenbuchensis Isolated from the Blood of a French Cow. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 2003, 990, 236–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Razanske, I.; Rosef, O.; Radzijevskaja, J.; Klepeckiene, K.; Lipatova, I.; Paulauskas, A. Infections with Bartonella spp. in free-ranging cervids and deer keds (Lipoptena cervi) in Norway. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018, 58, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dehio, C.; Sauder, U.; Hiestand, R. Isolation of Bartonella schoenbuchensis from Lipoptena cervi, a blood-sucking arthropod causing deer ked dermatitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 5320–5323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Korhonen, E.M.; Vera, C.P.; Pulliainen, A.; Sironen, T.; Aaltonen, K.; Kortet, R.; Härkönen, L.; Paakkonen, T.; Nieminen, P.; Mustonen, A.-M.; et al. Molecular detection of Bartonella spp. in deer ked pupae, adult keds and moose blood in Finland. Epidemiol. Infect. 2015, 143, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Król, N.; Militzer, N.; Stöbe, E.; Nijhof, A.M.; Pfeffer, M.; Kempf, V.A.J.; Obiegala, A. Evaluating transmission paths for three different Bartonella spp. in Ixodes ricinus ticks using artificial feeding. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Benedict, B.M.; Barboza, P.S. Adverse effects of Diptera flies on northern ungulates: Rangifer, Alces, and Bison. Mammal Rev. 2022, 52, 425–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Bartonella spp. using 16S–23S rRNA ITS region sequences constructed by Maximum Likelihood method and Tamura–3 parameter model. Numbers on the tree indicate bootstrap support (values < 50% not shown). The identification source (host) and country are given after the accession numbers. Bartonella sample in this study isolated from European bison is marked with ●.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Bartonella spp. using 16S–23S rRNA ITS region sequences constructed by Maximum Likelihood method and Tamura–3 parameter model. Numbers on the tree indicate bootstrap support (values < 50% not shown). The identification source (host) and country are given after the accession numbers. Bartonella sample in this study isolated from European bison is marked with ●.
Animals 13 00121 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of Bartonella spp. using gltA gene sequences constructed by Maximum Likelihood method and Tamura–3 parameter model. Numbers on the tree indicate bootstrap support (values < 50% not shown). The identification source (host) and country are given after the accession numbers. Bartonella sample in this study isolated from European bison is marked with ●.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of Bartonella spp. using gltA gene sequences constructed by Maximum Likelihood method and Tamura–3 parameter model. Numbers on the tree indicate bootstrap support (values < 50% not shown). The identification source (host) and country are given after the accession numbers. Bartonella sample in this study isolated from European bison is marked with ●.
Animals 13 00121 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of Bartonella spp. using rpoB gene sequences constructed by Maximum Likelihood method and Tamura–3 parameter model. Numbers on the tree indicate bootstrap support (values < 50% not shown). The identification source (host) and country are given after the accession numbers. Bartonella sample in this study isolated from European bison is marked with ●.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of Bartonella spp. using rpoB gene sequences constructed by Maximum Likelihood method and Tamura–3 parameter model. Numbers on the tree indicate bootstrap support (values < 50% not shown). The identification source (host) and country are given after the accession numbers. Bartonella sample in this study isolated from European bison is marked with ●.
Animals 13 00121 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paulauskas, A.; Ražanskė, I.; Lipatova, I.; Griciuvienė, L.; Aleksandravičienė, A.; Kibiša, A.; Černevičienė, D.; Radzijevskaja, J. First Molecular Detection of Bartonella bovis and Bartonella schoenbuchensis in European Bison (Bison bonasus). Animals 2023, 13, 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13010121

AMA Style

Paulauskas A, Ražanskė I, Lipatova I, Griciuvienė L, Aleksandravičienė A, Kibiša A, Černevičienė D, Radzijevskaja J. First Molecular Detection of Bartonella bovis and Bartonella schoenbuchensis in European Bison (Bison bonasus). Animals. 2023; 13(1):121. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13010121

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paulauskas, Algimantas, Irma Ražanskė, Indrė Lipatova, Loreta Griciuvienė, Asta Aleksandravičienė, Artūras Kibiša, Dalia Černevičienė, and Jana Radzijevskaja. 2023. "First Molecular Detection of Bartonella bovis and Bartonella schoenbuchensis in European Bison (Bison bonasus)" Animals 13, no. 1: 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13010121

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop