Next Article in Journal
Effect of Salmonella Typhimurium Colonization on Microbiota Maturation and Blood Leukocyte Populations in Broiler Chickens
Next Article in Special Issue
Does the Implementation of an Animal Welfare Programme on a Farm Yield a Demonstrable Improvement in Fattening Pig Welfare?
Previous Article in Journal
Microplastics as Contaminants in Water Bodies and Their Threat to the Aquatic Animals: A Mini-Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inter-Observer Repeatability of Indicators of Consciousness after Waterbath Stunning in Broiler Chickens
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 20
10.3390/ani12202866
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effects of Preslaughter Electrical Stunning on Serum Cortisol and Meat Quality Parameters of a Slow-Growing Chinese Chicken Breed

by
Wenpeng Li
1,†,
Chao Yan
1,2,†,
Kris Descovich
3,
Clive J. C. Phillips
4,5,
Yongyou Chen
6,
Huijing Huang
6,
Xuan Wu
6,
Jian Liu
6,
Siyu Chen
7,* and
Xingbo Zhao
1,*
1
College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
2
Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518124, China
3
School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia
4
Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51014 Tartu, Estonia
5
Curtin University Sustainability Policy (CUSP) Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
6
Nayong County Agriculture and Rural Bureau, Bijie 553300, China
7
Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Design and Precise Breeding of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, School of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2022, 12(20), 2866; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202866
Submission received: 24 August 2022 / Revised: 9 September 2022 / Accepted: 19 September 2022 / Published: 20 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Welfare of Animals in Livestock Production Systems and at Slaughter)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In China, although preslaughter stunning is commonly performed in large-scale production systems, this practice is less common in smaller-scale systems. To promote the concept of animal welfare, we selected common local chicken breeds and sampled the meat and blood of chickens with and without stunning. The experimental results verified that stunning before slaughter can improve meat quality, increase flavor and reduce the stress on chickens. It is more respectful of animal welfare and provides a theoretical basis for the promotion of animal welfare concepts in China.

Abstract

Electrical stunning is widely utilized prior to a neck cut to induce unconsciousness in order to improve animal welfare and slaughter efficiency in the broiler production industry. However, slaughter without stunning is still very commonly used in China, in part because there is a belief that stunning reduces meat quality. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the physical (hemorrhages, pH, drip loss, and shear force) and chemical (inosinic monophosphate concentration and reducing sugar content) properties of broiler meat differed between chickens in preslaughter stunning and nonstunned slaughter groups, and whether the groups differed in their levels of cortisol as an indicator of stress. Serum cortisol levels of the nonstunned group were nearly twice as high as those in the stunned group (p < 0.05). Several meat quality indicators were better in the stunned group than in the nonstunned group. We concluded that electrical stunning prior to slaughter significantly decreases the stress caused by slaughter, resulting in both improved animal welfare and meat quality traits.

1. Introduction

Animal welfare has received an increasing amount of attention in China, particularly in the field of animal farming [1]. Among the challenges for animal welfare within food chains, the slaughter method is widely recognized as a determinant of animal suffering and attracts significant attention from industry groups and consumers [2]. Preslaughter stunning of animals is applied to achieve loss of consciousness prior to slaughter being carried out [3]. This is generally considered better for animal welfare than slaughter without stunning [3]. Common stunning methods for livestock include mechanical, gas, and electrical stunning [4,5]. Mechanical stunning is performed on an individual animal using a penetrating or percussive device such as a captive bolt [6]. This is primarily used for large animals such as cattle, sheep, and goats [7]. For the slaughter of large numbers of small animals, such as broilers, this method is generally not efficient. Gas stunning is an alternative to mechanical stunning. The most common gases used to stun broilers are carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and argon. Gas stunning results in lower levels of carcass damage; however, it is expensive and more challenging to perform compared with other methods [4]. For these reasons, gas stunning is not commonly used in broiler production.
Currently, in China, large-scale farms typically slaughter broilers after stunning by delivering an electric shock via a water bath, followed by exsanguination. Electrical stunning (ES) directly applies a current through the animal. When the current is of sufficiently high frequency, it results in a grand mal seizure and irregular ventricular fibrillation, rapidly leading to a loss of consciousness and/or death [8]. Previous research has indicated that a high-frequency current can quickly and effectively induce cardiac arrest and loss of consciousness so slaughter can be humanely carried out [9,10]. In addition to the animal welfare outcomes, ES also has the advantages of being practical to apply and low-cost [11]. However, ES is also thought to cause carcass defects and reduce bloodletting efficiency, with the effects being related to high current frequencies [12]. While reducing current intensity and voltage may reduce carcass defects, this may also decrease stunning efficiency, resulting in negative impacts on animal welfare [9,10,13]. However, the scientific literature has equivocal results. Several studies have shown the effects of different voltage/current combinations on the meat quality of broilers [14,15]. Similarly, different stunning frequencies and electrical current waveforms have different effects on meat quality parameters and welfare [16]. However, others have concluded that meat quality attributes are not affected by the stunning conditions [17]. Regardless of the impact on meat quality, inappropriate combinations of voltage and frequency can lead to an improper death or a return to consciousness before slaughter can be carried out [15]. Thus, for good animal welfare, it is critical that the ES system is sufficient to ensure that the chickens will not regain consciousness or suffer during the slaughter process.
In China, although stunning is generally carried out before slaughter in large-scale production systems [1], the practice is not common in smaller-scale systems. According to industry focus groups, there is a belief that “stunning is harmful to the meat quality” in the southern regions of China [18]. In contrast, in the north, the consensus amongst participants is that stunning does not affect the taste, and the primary reason for not stunning is a lack of understanding of the technology and equipment involved [18]. Therefore, to increase the uptake of stunning in China, both quality concerns and technical expertise should be addressed and evaluated. Several studies have investigated the differences in carcass quality between broilers slaughtered with and without preslaughter stunning [3,19], but they must acknowledge the major differences in the carcass quality of different broiler breeds [20]. The Wumeng black bone chicken is a popular local chicken breed in the south of China [21]: the average weight of adult males is 2650 g and that of hens is 1840 g. Considering its widespread use in the industry, we chose this breed as our experimental material.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of preslaughter ES on the welfare and carcass quality of Wumeng black bone chicken based on the physical and chemical properties of the broiler meat and serum.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

The experimental and animal care protocols for this study were approved by the China Agricultural University Laboratory Animal Welfare and Animal Experimental Ethical Inspection (approval number: AW62902202-1-1). This study was performed in Nayong County, located in Bijie, Guizhou, China. A total of 40 180-day-old female Wumeng black bone chickens were used, sourced from the Yuansheng Animal Husbandry Co., Ltd., Bijie, China. This chicken breed is a slow-growing line, with a growth rate of about 11 g/day [22]. Birds were initially reared within a cage system until 70 days of age before being moved to a free-range system. One hundred birds were reared in a single group with approximately 2 m2 per bird. The surface of the rearing area consisted of a soil substrate with grass. Birds around 180 days of age are popular with Chinese consumers. Thus, the birds used in this study were chosen to be typically representative of this system.

2.2. Animal Slaughter and Sample Collection

In total, 40 180-day-old birds were randomly selected from 232 birds for sale and allocated into two groups: slaughter without stunning (n = 20) and slaughter after ES (n = 20). For the stunned group (Treatment S), birds were hung upside down on a chain track fitted with leg shackles, which moved them to a charged water bath where their heads entered the water. A medium voltage, low-frequency alternating current (50 V (48-52 mA), 50 Hz) was applied for 10 s, which is known to induce a loss of consciousness when visually assessed [16]. While the chicken was unconscious, a cut was manually made to the left artery in the lower jaw of the neck in the featherless area of the chicken’s ear, 1.5–2 cm from the head gland and 1.5 cm from the end of the hyoid bone, with subsequent complete exsanguination. The remaining 20 individuals were identically slaughtered; however, they did not receive preslaughter stunning and were therefore slaughtered while conscious (Treatment NS). We did not slaughter NS birds to conduct the experiment. Instead, we collected samples with the consent of the customers who purchased the NS birds. Before slaughter, all birds were kept in the same conditions. All the NS and S birds were slaughtered at the same time. All slaughter procedures were carried out by the same butcher with two years of work experience who was blind to the aim of this study. Blood samples from the artery cut during the slaughter procedure were collected in 9 mL vacuum blood collection tubes (VACUETTE, Greiner Bio-One, Solingen, Germany) to measure cortisol levels. To determine the physical properties of the meat, the left side of both breast and thigh muscles was collected, and fresh samples were analyzed within 24 h after slaughter. In preparation for analysis, the left breast and thigh muscles were divided into 5 sections, each with an approximate weight of 100 g, to investigate physical properties (hemorrhage, pH, drip loss, cooking loss, and shear force). The right sides of the breast and thigh muscles were frozen at −20 ℃ to analyze their chemical properties. They were each divided into 2 equal sections for chemical analysis (inosine monophosphate concentration and reducing sugar content). All analyses were performed in triplicate except for shear force analysis, for which six replicates were used.

2.3. Physical Properties of the Meat

2.3.1. Hemorrhage

Hemorrhaging in the breast and thigh muscles was quantified using a visual grading system [23]. Classification of the severity of hemorrhaging was independently performed by an observer trained in the visual grading system and with two years of slaughter experience. Hemorrhaging was classified on a three-point scale, with class 1 representing hemorrhage-free muscles, class 2 representing slight hemorrhage, and class 3 representing muscles with numerous and/or severe hemorrhages.

2.3.2. pH

Measurements of pH values were performed using a portable pH probe (PH-STAR, Matthaus, Germany) by inserting the probe into the center of the muscle sample within 24 h of slaughter. The pH meter was calibrated prior to the measurement using two buffer solutions at pH 4.0 and 7.0. The probe was inserted into the muscle three times (in different locations), and the final pH value used was the mean of the three measurements.

2.3.3. Drip Loss

To determine drip loss, meat samples were weighed before analysis. Each sample was suspended in a sealed polyethylene bag with an aluminum wire hook and sewing thread. The sealed bag was filled with nitrogen to minimize the contact between the meat sample and the bag. Both were then suspended in a refrigerator at 4 ℃. After storage for 24 h, the surface water of the meat was gently dried with filter paper before weighing. The drip loss values were calculated using the difference between the initial and final weights of the samples, and the results are expressed as a percentage of the initial weight [24].

2.3.4. Cooking Loss

To determine cooking loss, samples were preweighed and subsequently placed in sealed polyethylene bags. The bags were then transferred into continuously heated boiling water until the samples reached an internal temperature of 75 ℃, as measured by a portable thermometer (Hengko, Shenzhen, China). The bags were then removed from the boiling water and cooled to 25 ℃, as determined by the portable thermometer, at which point surface water was gently wiped from the sample using a paper towel. Cooking loss values were calculated as the difference between the initial and final weights of the samples, and the results are expressed as a percentage of the initial weight [25].

2.3.5. Shear Force

To measure shear force, the same samples from the cooking loss measurements were used. They were placed overnight at 4 ℃ in a fridge (BCD-251U, Hisense, Qingdao, China) and then removed and cut into 1 ✕ 1 ✕ 4 cm long strips to determine the shear force using a muscle tenderness meter (C-LM3B, Tenovo, Beijing, China) by the Warner-Bratzer method [25]. The values collected were a mean of six measurements expressed in kilogram-force [25].

2.4. Chemical Properties of the Meat

2.4.1. Cortisol Assays

Blood samples were allowed to stand for 30 min at room temperature, following which they were centrifuged for 10 min at 1500× g. The separated serum was collected and stored at −20 °C until further analysis. Cortisol concentrations were determined from the serum with a cortisol ELISA kit (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) used in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. An enzyme-labeled instrument (Multiskan FC, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to measure the absorbance at 420 nm of the samples. A standard curve with an R2 value of 0.9914 was generated to determine the amount of cortisol in an unknown sample. The samples were analyzed in triplicate, and values used for data analysis were the mean of the three values.

2.4.2. Inosine Monophosphate Concentration

The inosine monophosphate (IMP) concentration was determined with a chicken inosine monophosphate ELISA kit (LaiEr bio, Hefei, China) used in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. An enzyme-labeled instrument (Multiskan FC, Thermo Scientific, Germany) was used to determine optical density at 450 nm. A standard curve with an R2 value of 0.9936 was generated to determine the amount of inosine monophosphate. The samples were analyzed in triplicate, and the values used for data analysis were the mean of the three values.

2.4.3. Reducing Sugar Content

The reducing sugar (RS) content was determined with a reducing sugar ELISA kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China) used in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, and the results are expressed as a percentage of the sample weight. A UV spectrophotometer (UV-5100, METASH, Shanghai, China) was used to determine optical density at 540 nm. A standard curve with an R2 value of 0.9919 was generated to determine the amount of reducing sugar. The samples were analyzed in triplicate, and values used for data analysis were the mean of the three.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The data of hemorrhage scores were not continuous, so we used the chi-squared test to judge the significance of the difference between the two groups, and the other data were all analyzed using Student’s t-test. P < 0.05 was classified as indicating a significant difference. All analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 software (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). The experimental data are presented as the mean ± standard error (SEM).

3. Results

3.1. Physical Properties of the Meat

The hemorrhage scores from the breast muscle were significantly higher in chickens slaughtered without stunning (p < 0.05) (Table 1). No severe hemorrhages (Score 3) were found in the S carcasses, but the breast muscle from two broilers slaughtered without stunning displayed severe bruising. The pH values measured from the breast muscle of unstunned birds were significantly lower than those from stunned birds (p < 0.05) (Table 1). Unstunned birds had a greater drip loss for both breast and thigh meat than the stunned birds (Table 1). Cooking loss was greater in the unstunned than stunned birds for breast muscle (p < 0.05), but there was no difference between groups in the thigh muscle. The shear force values of meat from unstunned birds were greater than those for meat from unstunned birds, for both breast and thigh muscles (p < 0.05).

3.2. Chemical Properties of the Blood and Meat

The cortisol levels measured in the blood of stunned chickens were considerably lower than those of unstunned chickens (p < 0.05). The inosine monophosphate content measured from the breast muscles of stunned chickens was greater than that from unstunned chickens (p < 0.05), while the inosine monophosphate concentration of the thigh muscles was unaffected by the experimental treatment. Analysis of pooled data revealed that in both breast and thigh muscles, the reducing sugar content in the chicken was similar in the two groups (Table 2).

4. Discussion

The results from our study indicated that preslaughter stunning results in lower cortisol levels and better meat quality based on water-holding capacity and shear force. The physical properties of the resulting meat were more affected by preslaughter stunning than the chemical properties, based on the number of measures that were statistically significant.

4.1. Physical Properties of the Meat

The general belief is that ES is more respectful of animal welfare [14]. However, it has also been argued that ES causes contraction, movement between muscles, and abnormal positioning of the animal during the stunning procedure, resulting in rupturing of blood vessels and damage to muscle fibers [15]. In the present study, the hemorrhage scores of breast muscle from stunned birds were significantly lower (better) than those of unstunned birds. This indicated that stunning at the voltage/current used has a beneficial effect on the resulting carcass quality. Our results contradict those of previous studies, which suggested that ES causes more severe bruising [12,15]. The reason for this difference may be that we compared two types of slaughter (with and without ES prior to slaughter), while the other studies compared two methods of preslaughter stunning (ES and gas stunning).
pH values were lower in the unstunned group than in the stunned group, especially for the breast muscle (p < 0.05). This may be explained by anaerobic glycolysis during slaughter in the unstunned birds. When an animal is slaughtered, the oxygen supply chain is cut off, and anaerobic glycolysis becomes the main metabolic pathway for energy production [26]. The pH value of the muscle in the early postmortem period, and the final pH value greatly affect meat quality after slaughter. In the early postmortem period, if the pH value of the muscle is low and the carcass temperature high, degeneration of myofibril protein and sarcoplasmic protein in the muscle occurs, increasing the incidence of PSE-like (pale, soft, and exudative) meat in chicken. If the pH value slowly declines in the early postmortem period, it results in cold contraction, thereby reducing the water retention and tenderness of the muscle [12]. For chickens that are conscious at the slaughter stage, more lactic acid likely accumulates in the muscles than in stunned chickens; our observations suggested that this occurred because the unstunned birds extensively flapped their wings during slaughter (although behavior was not formally recorded during this study). This may explain why the pH values of the unstunned group were lower than those of stunned group. In line with our results, previous studies have indicated that stunning before slaughter reduces the flapping of broilers’ wings during the slaughter process, thereby reducing the speed of glycolysis after slaughter [12,27]. Moreover, the decrease in pH value is likely to have been caused by the increase in flapping wings induced by stress and struggle. In stressful situations, the secretion of catecholamines and glucocorticoids stimulates hepatic glycogenolysis, leading to elevated blood glucose levels [28,29]. After exsanguination, the muscle becomes hypoxic and triggers anaerobic glycolysis, in which glycogen is hydrolyzed to lactic acid. As a result, the pH of the meat drops [30]. Therefore, we propose that pH can be used as a reference for assessing stress, with lower pH levels indicating higher levels of stress during slaughter.
In our study, drip loss from breast and thigh meat was greater in unstunned birds. Drip loss refers to the loss of liquid from the muscle using only the action of gravity over a period of time [31]. pH levels in meat are known to impact drip loss, as lower pH levels cause myofibril contraction, which makes the voids in the myofilament smaller and water loss higher [32,33].
Cooking losses are related to a reduction in meat quality, and the index is one of the most commonly used to describe the water retention of processed meat [34]. Cooking loss is affected by several factors, including the fat content, protein denaturation under heating, and the volume lost during thawing [35]. In the current study, a significant difference was found in breast muscle cooking loss between the experimental groups. Both preslaughter factors and postmortem treatments are related to changes in meat quality traits, but these changes ultimately often affect muscle water-holding capacity by affecting the proteins that comprise the muscle [36]. Again, a lower pH value may cause degeneration of the myofibril protein and sarcoplasmic protein in the muscle [12,32,33], and the resulting protein denaturation can lead the myofibril mesh and muscle cells to stretch, directly affecting the muscle water-holding capacity after slaughter [37]. Therefore, the lower cooking loss of the muscle from stunned birds may be associated with a more rapidly decreasing pH value in the early stages after slaughter.
Shear force value is an indicator of muscle tenderness, which is a key factor determining the quality of meat [38]. The main variables that affect meat tenderness include sarcomere length, connective tissue content, and the degree of degradation of myofibril protein [39]. Long sarcomeres result in more tender meat, and sarcomere length is mainly affected by rigor mortis and improper slaughter techniques [40,41]. In the current study, myofibril contraction was likely caused by the lower pH value in the unstunned group promoting the degradation of the myofibril protein [33]. As the lower pH value may have resulted from struggling in the unstunned birds, this may explain the higher shear force value of unstunned birds’ meat compared with that of meat from stunned birds.

4.2. Chemical Properties of the Meat

Inosine monophosphate can improve the meat flavor of livestock and poultry [42,43] and is internationally used as an important index for measuring meat flavor [44]. Because IMP has weak chemical bonds, such as glycosidic and ester bonds, its stability depends on temperature and pH [45]. This may explain why, in our study, IMP concentration was found to be higher in the breast muscle of the stunned birds, with the higher initial pH in the breast muscle of the unstunned group apparently induced by wing flapping and anaerobic glycolysis. The lower pH may have resulted in higher degradation of IMP in the unstunned chickens. As we did not formally investigate the behavior of the birds, this is only a hypothesis; however, it may explain why there was a significant difference in inosine monophosphate concentration in the breast muscle but not the thigh muscle.
The hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenocortical (HPA) axis is a critical adaptive system that maximizes survival potential in the face of physical or psychological challenges [46]. The activated hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone neurons stimulate the pituitary gland to release corticotropin, which in turn stimulates the adrenal cortex to secrete cortisol [47]. Cortisol concentration is a widely used indicator for the assessment of acute stress [48]. In the current study, slaughtering the conscious birds without stunning appears to have been a major stressor, resulting in activation of the HPA axis and increasing the release of cortisol [49].
The Maillard reaction, a chemical reaction between reducing sugars (e.g., glucose and ribose) and free amino acids, generates many important flavor compounds and thereby intensifies the taste of cooked meat [50]. Glucose, as a type of reducing sugar, is expected to have been utilized in large quantities during slaughter in the unstunned birds because we observed that they reacted behaviorally (e.g., wing flapping and struggling). However, in the current study, no differences in reducing sugar content were found between the two experimental groups. One of the main reducing sugars in meat is ribose [51]. Ribose is one of inosine monophosphate degradation products, and the higher inosine monophosphate degradation rate of unstunned birds induced by lower pH may have resulted in the production of more ribose [52].
Overall, the results of this study suggest that in comparison with the traditional broiler slaughter method, preslaughter ES achieves a better product quality, which aligns with the results of previous research [3]. In addition, the lower cortisol concentrations and higher pH values of the stunned group compared with those of the traditional slaughter group indicated that preslaughter ES results in better animal welfare [12,27,53]. Therefore, preslaughter stunning is not only important for meat quality but also contributes to improved welfare for the chickens and should therefore be more widely adopted.

5. Conclusions

Electrical stunning prior to slaughter improved the physical properties of meat, including pH, drip loss, cooking loss, and shear force. In addition, inosine monophosphate content, an important indicator of the umami taste of meat, was also increased. In combination with a decrease in serum cortisol levels, these results suggest that preslaughter stunning can significantly both improve animal welfare and product quality.

Author Contributions

Original conceptualization, C.J.C.P.; detailed conceptualization, X.Z.; data curation, W.L. and C.Y.; formal analysis, W.L.; investigation, W.L., C.Y., and X.Z.; methodology, W.L. and C.Y.; resources, Y.C., H.H., X.W., and J.L.; supervision, S.C. and X.Z.; validation, K.D., C.J.C.P., and S.C.; writing—original draft, W.L.; writing —review and editing, C.Y., K.D., C.J.C.P., and S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded as part of the Animal Welfare Standards Project by the Good Ventures Foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Beijing, and approved by the Ethics Committee of China Agricultural University (approval number: AW62902202-1-1).

Data Availability Statement

Data is available on request from the Corresponding Author.

Acknowledgments

We express our sincere gratitude to the staff from Guizhou Nayong Yuanshengmuye Ltd., Bijie, 553300, Guizhou, China, for the support during the study and for providing the Wumeng black bone chickens.

Conflicts of Interest

This study was funded as part of the Animal Welfare Standards Project by the Good Ventures Foundation. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data; the writing of this article; or the decision to submit it for publication. All authors declare no other competing interests.

References

  1. Meng, X.; Hamer, R.; Meng, Q.; Wang, P.; Meng, F.; Li, H.; Feng, J.; Xue, D.; Zhou, Y. Animal welfare development in China. Science 2012, 338, 1150–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. De Jonge, J.; van Trijp, H.C. The impact of broiler production system practices on consumer perceptions of animal welfare. Poultry Sci. 2013, 92, 3080–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Saraiva, S.; Esteves, A.; Oliveira, I.; Mitchell, M.; Stilwell, G. Impact of pre-slaughter factors on welfare of broilers. Veterinary Animal Sci. 2020, 10, 100146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Berg, C.; Raj, M. A Review of Different Stunning Methods for Poultry-Animal Welfare Aspects (Stunning Methods for Poultry). Animals 2015, 5, 1207–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fuseini, A.; Knowles, T.G.; Lines, J.A.; Hadley, P.J.; Wotton, S.B. The stunning and slaughter of cattle within the EU: A review of the current situation with regard to the halal market. Animal Welfare 2016, 25, 365–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zulkifli, I.; Goh, Y.M.; Norbaiyah, B.; Sazili, A.Q.; Lotfi, M.; Soleimani, A.F.; Small, A.H. Changes in blood parameters and electroencephalogram of cattle as affected by different stunning and slaughter methods in cattle. Animal Prod. Sci. 2014, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Grist, A.; Lines, J.; Knowles, T.G.; Mason, C.; Wotton, S. The Use of a Mechanical Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt Device for the Euthanasia of Neonate Lambs. Animals 2018, 8, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Llonch, P.; Rodríguez, P.; Casal, N.; Carreras, R.; Muñoz, I.; Dalmau, A.; Velarde, A. Electrical stunning effectiveness with current levels lower than 1 A in lambs and kid goats. Res. Veterinary Sci. 2014, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Contreras, C.; Beraquet, N. Electrical Stunning, Hot Boning, and Quality of Chicken Breast Meat. Poultry Sci. 2001, 80, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Raj, M. Recent developments in stunning and slaughter of poultry. World’s Poultry Sci. J. 2006, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Girasole, M.; Chirollo, C.; Ceruso, M.; Vollano, L.; Chianese, A.; Cortesi, M.L. Optimization of Stunning Electrical Parameters to Improve Animal Welfare in a Poultry Slaughterhouse. Italian J. Food Safety 2015, 4, 4576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Joseph, P.; Schilling, M.W.; Williams, J.B.; Radhakrishnan, V.; Battula, V.; Christensen, K.; Vizzier-Thaxton, Y.; Schmidt, T.B. Broiler stunning methods and their effects on welfare, rigor mortis, and meat quality. World’s Poultry Sci. J. 2013, 69, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wilkins, L.J.; Gregory, N.G.; Wotton, S.B. Effectiveness of different electrical stunning regimens for turkeys and consequences for carcase quality. British Poultry Sci. 1999, 40, 478–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kissel, C.; Soares, A.; Oba, A.; Shimokomaki, M. Electrical Water Bath Stunning of Broilers: Effects on Breast Meat Quality. The J. Poultry Sci. 2015, 52, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Xu, L.; Zhang, L.; Yue, H.Y.; Wu, S.G.; Zhang, H.J.; Ji, F.; Qi, G.H. Effect of electrical stunning current and frequency on meat quality, plasma parameters, and glycolytic potential in broilers. Poultry Sci. 2011, 90, 1823–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Siqueira, T.S.; Borges, T.D.; Rocha, R.M.M.; Figueira, P.T.; Luciano, F.B.; Macedo, R.E.F. Effect of electrical stunning frequency and current waveform in poultry welfare and meat quality. Poultry Sci. 2017, 96, 2956–2964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sirri, F.; Petracci, M.; Zampiga, M.; Meluzzi, A. Effect of EU electrical stunning conditions on breast meat quality of broiler chickens. Poultry Sci. 2017, 96, 3000–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sinclair, M.; Idrus, Z.; Burns, G.L.; Phillips, C.J.C. Livestock Stakeholder Willingness to Embrace Preslaughter Stunning in Key Asian Countries. Animals 2019, 9, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Bostami, A.; Mun, H.S.; Dilawar, M.A.; Baek, K.S.; Yang, C.J. Carcass Characteristics, Proximate Composition, Fatty Acid Profile, and Oxidative Stability of Pectoralis major and Flexor cruris medialis Muscle of Broiler Chicken Subjected to with or without Level of Electrical Stunning, Slaughter, and Subsequent Bleeding. Animals 2021, 11, 1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Guan, R.F.; Lyu, F.; Chen, X.Q.; Ma, J.Q.; Jiang, H.; Xiao, C.G. Meat quality traits of four Chinese indigenous chicken breeds and one commercial broiler stock. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2013, 14, 896–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yan, C.; Xiao, J.; Chen, D.; Turner, S.; Li, Z.; Liu, H.; Liu, W.; Liu, J.; Xingbo, Z. Feed Restriction Induced Changes in Behavior, Corticosterone, and Microbial Programming in Slow- and Fast-Growing Chicken Breeds. Animals 2021, 11, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chen, S.; Yan, C.; Xiang, H.; Xiao, J.; Liu, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Liu, H.; Zhang, X.; Ou, M.; et al. Transcriptome changes underlie alterations in behavioral traits in different types of chicken. J. Animal Sci. 2020, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hillebrand, S.J.W.; Lambooij, E.; Veerkamp, C.H. The effects of alternative electrical and mechanical stunning methods on hemorrhaging and meat quality of broiler breast and thigh muscles. Poultry Sci. 1996, 75, 664–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Honikel, K.-O. Reference methods supported by OECD and their use in Mediterranean meat products. Food Chem. 1997, 59, 573–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pinheiro, R.S.B.; Francisco, C.L.; Lino, D.M.; Borba, H. Meat quality of Santa Inês lamb chilled-then-frozen storage up to 12 months. Meat Sci. 2019, 148, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bee, G.; Biolley, C.; Guex, G.; Herzog, W.; Lonergan, S.M.; Huff-Lonergan, E. Effects of available dietary carbohydrate and preslaughter treatment on glycolytic potential, protein degradation, and quality traits of pig muscles. J. Animal Sci. 2006, 84, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Prinz, S.; Van Oijen, G.; Ehinger, F.; Bessei, W.; Coenen, A. Electrical waterbath stunning: Influence of different waveform and voltage settings on the induction of unconsciousness and death in male and female broiler chickens. Poultry Sci. 2012, 91, 998–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Knowles, T.G.; Warriss, P.D. Stress Physiology of Animals during Transport. Livestock Handling and Transport, 3rd ed.; CABI: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2007; pp. 312–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pollard, J.C.; Littlejohn, R.P.; Asher, G.W.; Pearse, A.J.; Stevenson-Barry, J.M.; McGregor, S.K.; Manley, T.R.; Duncan, S.J.; Sutton, C.M.; Pollock, K.L.; et al. A comparison of biochemical and meat quality variables in red deer (Cervus elaphus) following either slaughter at pasture or killing at a deer slaughter plant. Meat Sci. 2002, 60, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bozzo, G.; Barrasso, R.; Marchetti, P.; Roma, R.; Samoilis, G.; Tantillo, G.; Ceci, E. Analysis of Stress Indicators for Evaluation of Animal Welfare and Meat Quality in Traditional and Jewish Slaughtering. Animals 2018, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pettersen, M.K.; Nilsen-Nygaard, J.; Hansen, A.; Carlehög, M.; Liland, K.H. Effect of Liquid Absorbent Pads and Packaging Parameters on Drip Loss and Quality of Chicken Breast Fillets. Foods 2021, 10, 1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Barbut, S.; Sosnicki, A.A.; Lonergan, S.M.; Knapp, T.; Ciobanu, D.C.; Gatcliffe, L.J.; Huff-Lonergan, E.; Wilson, E.W. Progress in reducing the pale, soft and exudative (PSE) problem in pork and poultry meat. Meat Sci. 2008, 79, 46–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Huff-Lonergan, E.; Lonergan, S.M. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Sci. 2005, 71, 194–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Brambila, G.S.; Bowker, B.C.; Chatterjee, D.; Zhuang, H. Descriptive texture analyses of broiler breast fillets with the wooden breast condition stored at 4°C and −20°C. Poultry Sci. 2018, 97, 1762–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Vieira, C.; Diaz, M.T.; Martínez, B.; García-Cachán, M.D. Effect of frozen storage conditions (temperature and length of storage) on microbiological and sensory quality of rustic crossbred beef at different states of ageing. Meat Sci. 2009, 83, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hughes, J.M.; Oiseth, S.K.; Purslow, P.P.; Warner, R.D. A structural approach to understanding the interactions between colour, water-holding capacity and tenderness. Meat Sci. 2014, 98, 520–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Warner, R.D.; Greenwood, P.L.; Pethick, D.W.; Ferguson, D.M. Genetic and environmental effects on meat quality. Meat Sci. 2010, 86, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ono, T.; Kouguchi, T.; Ishikawa, A.; Nagano, A.J.; Takenouchi, A.; Igawa, T.; Tsudzuki, M. Quantitative trait loci mapping for the shear force value in breast muscle of F2 chickens. Poultry Sci. 2019, 98, 1096–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Oliveira, R.F.; Mello, J.L.M.; Ferrari, F.B.; Souza, R.A.; Pereira, M.R.; Cavalcanti, E.N.F.; Villegas-Cayllahua, E.A.; Fidelis, H.A.; Giampietro-Ganeco, A.; Fávero, M.S.; et al. Effect of Aging on the Quality of Breast Meat from Broilers Affected by Wooden Breast Myopathy. Animals 2021, 11, 1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hopkins, D.L.; Thompson, J.M. The Degradation of Myofibrillar Proteins in Beef and Lamb Using Denaturing Electrophoresis—An Overview. J. Muscle Foods 2002, 13, 81–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Koohmaraie, M.; Geesink, G.H. Contribution of postmortem muscle biochemistry to the delivery of consistent meat quality with particular focus on the calpain system. Meat Sci. 2006, 74, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Masic, U.; Yeomans, M.R. Umami flavor enhances appetite but also increases satiety. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 100, 532–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Narukawa, M.; Morita, K.; Hayashi, Y. L-theanine elicits an umami taste with inosine 5′-monophosphate. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2008, 72, 3015–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lee, H.-Y.; Kim, J.-M.; Byun, M.-J.; Kang, K.-S.; Kim, T.-H.; Hong, K.-C.; Lee, K.-T. Structure and polymorphisms of the 5′ regulatory region of porcine adenylate kinase 3-like 1 gene and effect on trait of meat quality. Genes Genom. 2011, 33, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Matoba, T.; Kuchiba, M.; Kimura, M.; Hasegawa, K. Thermal Degradation of Flavor Enhancers, Inosine 5′-monophosphate, and Guanosine 5′-monophosphate in Aqueous Solution. J. Food Sci. 2006, 53, 1156–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jankord, R.; Herman, J.P. Limbic regulation of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical function during acute and chronic stress. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1148, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Spencer, R.L.; Deak, T. A users guide to HPA axis research. Physiol. Behav. 2017, 178, 43–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gou, Z.; Abouelezz, K.F.M.; Fan, Q.; Li, L.; Lin, X.; Wang, Y.; Cui, X.; Ye, J.; Masoud, M.A.; Jiang, S.; et al. Physiological effects of transport duration on stress biomarkers and meat quality of medium-growing Yellow broiler chickens. Animal 2021, 15, 100079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Levy, B.; Tasker, J. Synaptic regulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis and its modulation by glucocorticoids and stress. Front. Cell. Neursci. 2012, 6, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Meinert, L.; Schäfer, A.; Bjergegaard, C.; Aaslyng, M.D.; Bredie, W.L. Comparison of glucose, glucose 6-phosphate, ribose, and mannose as flavour precursors in pork; the effect of monosaccharide addition on flavour generation. Meat Sci. 2009, 81, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mottram, D.S. Flavour formation in meat and meat products: A review. Food Chem. 1998, 62, 415–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tikk, M.; Tikk, K.; Tørngren, M.A.; Meinert, L.; Aaslyng, M.D.; Karlsson, A.H.; Andersen, H.J. Development of inosine monophosphate and its degradation products during aging of pork of different qualities in relation to basic taste and retronasal flavor perception of the meat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 7769–7777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hewagalamulage, S.D.; Lee, T.K.; Clarke, I.J.; Henry, B.A. Stress, cortisol, and obesity: A role for cortisol responsiveness in identifying individuals prone to obesity. Domestic Animal Endocrinol. 2016, 56, S112–S120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. The physical properties of breast and thigh muscles of broiler chickens.
Table 1. The physical properties of breast and thigh muscles of broiler chickens.
Muscle TypeSlaughter Method (Mean ± SEM)p-Value
Stunning (S)No Stunning (NS)
Breast
Hemorrhage score (1–3)1.15 ± 0.081.60 ± 1.150.013
pH 5.95 ± 0.075.67 ± 0.04<0.001
Drip loss (%)3.21 ± 1.124.11 ± 1.110.002
Cooking loss (%)26.34 ± 1.2629.48 ± 1.380.017
Shear force (kgf)22.69 ± 1.4427.63 ± 1.280.012
Thigh
Hemorrhage score (1–3)1.15 ± 0.081.35 ± 0.110.152
pH6.00 ± 0.035.88 ± 0.050.096
Drip loss (%)2.32 ± 1.453.11 ± 1.360.012
Cooking loss (%)32.16 ± 1.3532.24 ± 1.680.301
Shear force (kgf)30.42 ± 1.3841.81 ± 1.65<0.001
Table
Table 2. Chemical properties of breast and thigh muscles of broiler chickens in the stunned (Treatment S) and unstunned (Treatment NS) groups.
Table 2. Chemical properties of breast and thigh muscles of broiler chickens in the stunned (Treatment S) and unstunned (Treatment NS) groups.
CompoundsSlaughter Method (Mean ± SEM)p-Value
Stunning (S)No Stunning (NS)
Cortisol (pg/mL)273.51 ± 40.99504.29 ± 73.420.003
Breast
IMP (nmol/L)214.05 ± 5.43179.97 ± 5.80<0.001
Reducing sugar (μg/g)545.80 ± 61.01519.12 ± 63.530.698
Thigh
IMP (nmol/L)215.09 ± 5.53201.18 ± 6.470.056
Reducing sugar (μg/g)402.38 ± 45.52408.94 ± 61.610.174
IMP = inosine monophosphate, RS = reducing sugars. p-values are derived from t-tests.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, W.; Yan, C.; Descovich, K.; Phillips, C.J.C.; Chen, Y.; Huang, H.; Wu, X.; Liu, J.; Chen, S.; Zhao, X. The Effects of Preslaughter Electrical Stunning on Serum Cortisol and Meat Quality Parameters of a Slow-Growing Chinese Chicken Breed. Animals 2022, 12, 2866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202866

AMA Style

Li W, Yan C, Descovich K, Phillips CJC, Chen Y, Huang H, Wu X, Liu J, Chen S, Zhao X. The Effects of Preslaughter Electrical Stunning on Serum Cortisol and Meat Quality Parameters of a Slow-Growing Chinese Chicken Breed. Animals. 2022; 12(20):2866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202866

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Wenpeng, Chao Yan, Kris Descovich, Clive J. C. Phillips, Yongyou Chen, Huijing Huang, Xuan Wu, Jian Liu, Siyu Chen, and Xingbo Zhao. 2022. "The Effects of Preslaughter Electrical Stunning on Serum Cortisol and Meat Quality Parameters of a Slow-Growing Chinese Chicken Breed" Animals 12, no. 20: 2866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202866

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop