Next Article in Journal
Rapid Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION Sequencing Workflow for Campylobacter jejuni Identification in Broilers on Site—A Proof-of-Concept Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Influences of Substrate Grain Size on the Burrowing Behavior of Juvenile Meretrix meretrix
Previous Article in Journal
Cultural and Medicinal Use of Amphibians and Reptiles by Indigenous People in Punjab, Pakistan with Comments on Conservation Implications for Herpetofauna
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Movements and Behavior of Bighead Carps (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) Considering Fish Passage Energetics in an Experimental Vertical Slot Fishway
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 16
10.3390/ani12162061
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transcriptomic and Behavioral Studies of Small Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys polyactis) in Response to Noise Exposure

by
Xuguang Zhang
1,
Jun Zhou
1,
Wengang Xu
2,
Wei Zhan
3,
Huafeng Zou
4,5,* and
Jun Lin
1,*
1
Engineering Technology Research Center of Marine Ranching, College of Marine Ecology and Environment, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
2
School of Ocean, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China
3
Institute of Hydrobiology, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China
4
National Demonstration Center for Experimental Fisheries Science Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
5
The Key Laboratory of Exploration and Utilization of Aquatic Genetic Resources, Ministry of Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(16), 2061; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12162061
Submission received: 23 June 2022 / Revised: 28 July 2022 / Accepted: 11 August 2022 / Published: 13 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Behavioral Ecology of Aquatic Animals)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Ocean noise pollution from marine traffic may affect the behavioral, ecological and biochemical parameters of marine fish species. Most studies have focused on behavioral changes and hearing damage in fishes, but the molecular mechanism of noise exposure in the impairment of the brain has rarely been reported. In this study, using small yellow croaker (L. polyactis) as a model, we used RNA-seq methods to characterize differently expressed genes between the control group and the noise exposure group. GO and KEGG pathway analysis found that synaptic transmission, neurotransmitter transport, endocytosis procession, cell adhesion molecules and the extracellular matrix receptor interaction pathway were over-represented in the DEGs. In addition, behavioral studies revealed that L. polyactis kept motionless on the surface of the water and lost the ability to keep their balance after noise exposure. Collectively, our results indicate that exposure to noise stressors contributes to neurological dysfunction in the brain and impaired locomotor ability in L. polyactis.

Abstract

Noise has the potential to induce physiological stress in marine fishes, which may lead to all sorts of ecological consequences. In the current study, we used the RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) method to sequence the whole transcriptome of the brain in small yellow croaker (Larimichthys polyactis). The animals were exposed to a mix of noises produced by different types of boat played back in a tank, then the brain tissues were collected after the fish had been exposed to a 120 dB noise for 0.5 h. In total, 762 differently expressed genes (DEGs) between the two groups were identified, including 157 up regulated and 605 down regulated genes in the noise exposure group compared with the control group. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis indicated that the most up regulated gene categories included synaptic membranes, receptor-mediated endocytosis and the neurotransmitter secretion process. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways found that endocytosis, cell adhesion molecules and the extracellular matrix (ECM) receptor interaction pathway were over-represented. Specifically, ECM-related genes, including lamin2, lamin3, lamin4, coll1a2, coll5a1 and col4a5 were down regulated in the noise exposure group, implying the impaired composition of the ECM. In addition, the behavioral experiment revealed that L. polyactis exhibited avoidance behaviors to run away from the noise source at the beginning of the noise exposure period. At the end of the noise exposure period, L. polyactis kept motionless on the surface of the water and lost the ability to keep their balance. Taken together, our results indicate that exposure to noise stress contributes to neurological dysfunction in the brain and impaired locomotor ability in L. polyactis.

1. Introduction

The amount of anthropogenic noise in the marine environment caused by commercial shipping, hydroelectric power plants and drilling is increasing [1]. There is growing concern about the effects of this anthropogenic noise on aquatic life, since many fishes depend on sound to communicate, detect prey or predators, and respond to the world around them. Noise pollution may affect the behavioral, ecological and biochemical parameters of marine fish [2,3].
Anthropogenic noise sources, which are mainly produced by boats emitting noise (typically <1 kHz), occupy the same frequency bands that many marine species use to communicate [4]. The highest intensities usually fall within frequencies ranging from 0.1 to 1 kHz [5]. This frequency range has been shown to be a potential threat to fish species, because most audiograms of marine fish species show that their greatest sensitivity to noise falls within this range [6]. More studies have demonstrated that anthropogenic noise may affect the hearing thresholds, communication, movement patterns, foraging and biochemical parameters of fish, and even the fitness of ecological populations [7]. For example, recent studies found that fish escaped and swam faster [8], but suffered more mortality by predation with exposure to boat noise [9].
In the sea environment, noise pollution may pose adverse effects related to orientation toward prey, predators and conspecifics in their environment. In aquaculture systems, cultured fish could also be exposed to noise from the aerator, water pumps and filtration systems [10]. For example, Huang et al. observed that largemouth bass had significantly lower weight gain after exposure to underwater noise, accompanied by a higher degree of oxidative stress in the liver tissues [11]. In studies on rats, it was found that noise exposure could induce structural and functional injuries of the brain, which resulted in impairments in memory and deficits in motor coordination [12].
The small yellow croaker (Larimichthys polyactis, L. polyactis), a demersal fish species, is widely distributed in the Bohai sea, East Sea and Yellow Sea of China [13]. Due to its high economic and nutritional value, L. polyactis has become an economically important marine fish. To date, studies of noise pollution on aquatic animals have mainly focused on behavior and hearing damage, and the detailed mechanisms underlying the intracellular responses to noise exposure in the brain are lacking. In the present study, we applied RNA-seq to sequence the whole transcriptome of the brain tissues of L. polyactis to identify transcriptome changes after noise exposure.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal

Wild L. polyactis fish with body weights of approximately 50–70 g were provided by the Marine Fisheries Research Institute of Zhejiang (Hangzhou, China). Fish were transported to Shanghai Ocean University and cultured at 14 °C for 1 week in a 1 m3 tank for acclimation before the beginning of the experiments. All animal procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Shanghai Ocean University (series number: SHOU-DW-2021-022).

2.2. Sound Exposure and Behavior Experiment

The L. polyactis fish were exposed to boat noise with a mean sound pressure level (SPLrms) of 120 dB re 1 µPa continuously for 30 min in soundproof room (Shino Acoustics, Shanghai, China). The noise from a wooden fishing boat with a 22-horsepower outboard engine was recorded in the waters of a suspended mussel farm. The boat noise was played back through a portable computer via Audacity 2.4. After passing through the power amplifier (Sansui S2-350, Guangzhou, China), the signal was fed to a UW30 underwater speaker with a frequency response of 100–10 kHz (Figure 1). The speaker was set facing upward at the bottom of an acrylic cylindrical tank with a diameter of 40 cm and filled to 45 cm depth with seawater, without the speaker touching the side of the tank. During exposure, a floating nylon cage (20 cm × 20 cm × 20 cm) 5 cm above the speaker was used to hold the fish. To monitor ambient tank sounds and noise playback during the experiments, a Brüel & Kjær hydrophone (type 8013, with a sensitivity of −212 dB re 1 µPa and a frequency range of 0.1 Hz to 20 kHz) was deployed into the cage to measure the recorded signal without fish present. The signal from the hydrophone was connected to a Brüel & Kjær condition amplifier (type 2692), then fed to the Brüel & Kjær 3050 input module, saved and analyzed by BK Cnnect (version 2009.1) software. The root mean square sound pressure level (SPLrms) of the sound recordings was computed using BK Connect (Fast Fourier Transform lines 1600, Hanning window with 66.7% overlap between 10 and 2000 Hz). Since most fish species are sensitive to frequencies between 100 and 1000 Hz [14], the frequency range of 10–2000 Hz was used in this study. During the process of noise exposure, the locomotor behavior of the fish in the tank was recorded using a video camera.

2.3. Total RNA Isolation and Illumina Sequencing

After the experiment of noise exposure was finished, the fish were removed from the tank and sacrificed. The fish in the control group were put in the same tank but were not exposed to the noise stress. The tissues of the brain (control, n = 3; noise, n = 3) were quickly dissected and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For RNA-seq, total RNA was subjected to poly(A) enrichment using Oligod(T)x25 Magnetic Beads. RNA-seq libraries were prepared using the NEBNext mRNA Library Prep Reagent Set (NEB; lpswich, MA, USA). Sequencing was conducted with the Illumina HiSeq 1500 platform (Oebiotech, Shanghai, China). All the raw sequence data of RNA-seq have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA862477.

2.4. Alignment of Transcriptomic Data

After trimming low-quality bases from the 5′ and 3′ ends of the remaining reads, the resulting high-quality reads were mapped onto the L. polyactis reference genome [15]. An index of the reference genome was built, and clean reads were aligned to the reference genome of L. polyactis (Genbank assembly accession: GCA_018985215.1) using hisat2. The HTSeq-count was used to generate the total number of reads for each gene [16]. For differential gene expression testing, gene-level counts were analyzed using the R bioconductor package edgeR [17]. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were considered statistically significant if the false discovery rate (FDR) was 0.05 and the absolute value of log2 (fold change) ≥ 1.

2.5. GO and KEGG Pathway Enrichment Analysis

Gene Ontologies (GO) were obtained from the mapped translated protein sequences and homology searches against Swissprot using BLASTX in DIAMOND with an E-value cut-off of 1 × 10−5 to retrieve the ID mapping [18]. In order to identify characteristic changes associated with noise exposure, GO term enrichment analysis was performed. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) annotations were obtained using eggNOG mapper [19]. The GO functional enrichment and KEGG pathways analyses were performed using the R package clusterProfiler 4.0 [20].

2.6. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Reverse transcription (RT) reactions were carried out using the Hifair® Ⅱ 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Yeasen Biotechnology CO., Ltd., Shanghai, China) following the standard protocol. The qRT-PCR test was conducted by using SYBR Green Premix ExTaq (Takara, Dalian, China) on the ABI 7500system (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The relative mRNA expression of related genes was calculated by reference to β-actin using the 2−ΔΔCt method [21]. The primers were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 software.

3. Results

3.1. Transcriptome Overview

In this study, 130 million 150 bp paired-end reads were generated for the RNA-seq analysis. The six libraries generated 21.67 M raw reads on average, which resulted in 21.3 clean reads on average and a Q30 value ranging from 91.2% to 93.6%. One sample in the noise group was corrupted and excluded from further analysis. In total, 25,233 assembled transcripts were obtained and mapped to the genome of L. polyactis.

3.2. Gene Differential Expression Analysis

We found that 762 genes were differentially expressed between the control group and the noise exposure group. Among these, 157 were up regulated and 605 were downregulated in the noise exposure group compared with the control group (Supplemental Table S1). A volcano plot was used to visualize the differential expression of transcripts between the control and noise exposure groups (Figure 2). The red and green circles indicate up and down regulated genes, respectively. In addition, the heatmap of the DEGs provided a visual illustration of the expression differences (Figure 3), revealing a clear pattern that distinguished between the control and noise exposure groups.

3.3. Gene Ontology (GO) Analysis of Different Expressed Transcripts between the Two Groups

To obtain more information about the mechanism of how the brain responds to noise stress, Gene Ontology (GO) analysis was performed to elucidate the biological implications of the DEGs in the experiment. Synaptic membrane, postsynaptic membrane, receptor-mediated endocytosis and neurotransmitter secretion in the biological process category were enriched (Figure 4).

3.4. KEGG Pathway Enrichment Analysis of DEGs

KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the DEGs was performed to find critical pathways related to noise exposure stress. As shown in Figure 5, the KEGG pathway enrichment analysis identified that the pathway of endocytosis, ECM-receptor interaction and cell adhesion molecules were affected by noise exposure. Since laminin and collagen genes are closely related to the ECM and cell adhesion molecule pathway, these related genes were analyzed. It was found that almost all the related genes (coll1a2, coll5a1, col4a5, LOC104926245, LOC104931259, lamin2, lamin3 and lamin4) were down regulated in the noise exposure group compared with the control group (Figure 6).

3.5. Validation of the RNA-seq Results Using RT–PCR Methods

Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) analysis of the expression of eight genes was used to verify the RNA-seq results. Both methods identified genes with significant changes in their expression levels, both upregulated genes (nek10, ccdc141, fkbp6 and gp1bb) and downregulated genes (cops9, lama3, fat2 and grid2). The results of the qRT-PCR analysis were consistent with the RNA-seq results (Figure 7), suggesting the reliability of the RNA-seq results.

3.6. Locomotor Behavior of L. polyactis after Noise Exposure

Since our results demonstrated that noise exposure resulted in dysfunction the brain of L. polyactis, we tried to evaluate if the transcriptomic change in the brain could be related to behavioral changes induced by noise exposure. The behavior experiment revealed that when L. polyactis fish were exposed to noise, they exhibited an obvious avoidance response. At the end of the noise exposure period, L. polyactis lay motionless on the surface of the water and lost the ability to keep their balance (Supplementary Video S1 and Figure 8).

4. Discussion

Although environmental noise exposure has been extensively studied, most studies have focused on behavioral changes and hearing damage in fishes and mammals [22]; the molecular mechanism of noise exposure in the brain has rarely been reported. Hence, in this study, we investigated the exposure of L. polyactis to noise pollutants to evaluate the effects of noise stress on the brain.

4.1. Synaptic Dysfunction

Synapses depend heavily on cell adhesion to provide a physical link between pre- and post-synaptic cells. The adhesion of cells to cells or the extracellular matrix regulates the structure and function of synapses [23]. Synaptic disruption has been recognized as an early neuropathologic event. In this study, GO enrichment analysis indicated that the synaptic membrane, postsynaptic membrane, endocytosis and neurotransmitter secretion were significantly enriched in the cellular component category and biological process category. These results supported the evidence that the noise stress alters the function of synapses [24]. Vesicular inhibitory amino acid transporter (VIAAT) is a synaptic vesicle protein responsible for the vesicular storage of γ-aminobutyrate (GABA) and glycine [25]. Regulating synaptic membrane exocytosis 4 (rims4) proteins are important components of the presynaptic machinery for neurotransmitter release, and perform an essential function in neurotransmitter release. In this study, all of these genes were found to be significantly down regulated after noise exposure. In addition, the structural and biochemical changes in the synapses in response to a number of stimuli are referred to as synaptic plasticity [26], which includes alterations in postsynaptic proteins and morphological changes [27]. Morphological changes can cause functional changes and lead to dysfunction in synaptic transmission efficiency [28]. Dysfunctions of the synapse may result in abnormal locomotor behavior, which is consistent with the motionless behavior of L. polyactis observed at the end of the noise exposure experiment.

4.2. Neurotransmitters and Synaptic Transmission

The neurons communicate via chemical synapses. Neurotransmitters are stored in synaptic vesicles and released by exocytosis upon activation. After these synaptic vesicles have been released, they need to be recycled locally in order to maintain synaptic transmission [29]. Noise stress has also been shown to alter neurotransmitter levels in the brain and reduce dendrite growth, leading to impaired memory and cognition in rats [30,31,32]. Previous studies have found that acute and chronic noise stress results in the release of neurotransmitters such as glutamate, acetylcholine and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the brain [33,34,35]. Accordingly, in this study, we found that several genes related to neurotransmitter transport genes, such as Grid2 and LOC104931322, were over-represented in the GO enrichment analysis. Grid2 is a member of the ionotropic glutamate receptor family of excitatory neurotransmitter receptors. Changes in the expression and post-translational modifications of Grid genes can lead to dynamic changes in the neural circuits in normal learning and diseased states [36]. The gene LOC104931322, sodium- and chloride-dependent GABA transporter 2, plays a role in the disposition of GABA in the brain. In this study, both grid2 and LOC104931322 were significantly down regulated, suggesting that the transmission of glutamate and GABA was altered by noise stress. Synaptic transmission efficiency was reduced, and this reduction led to synaptic dysfunction.

4.3. The Composition of the Extracellular Matrix (ECM)

The ECM of the brain is essential for the maintenance of brain function, providing structural support and mediating cell–cell interactions [37]. Laminin is important components of the ECM and participates in neuronal development, survival and regeneration. Laminin is rich in the basement membranes of the endothelial cells of the blood–brain barrier. Degradation of laminin can affect neuronal survival, and loss of the laminin foundation can predispose neurons to excitotoxic death [38]. For example, an injection of excitotoxin into the hippocampus of mice resulted in hippocampal neuronal death, accompanied by the degradation of laminin [39]. Consistent with this idea, several laminin genes, including lama2, lama3 and lama4 were down regulated in this study (Figure 5), implying that the composition of the ECM in the brain is destroyed after noise exposure.
In the systemic ECM, the most abundant matrix components are the collagen family, which provide structural integrity and contribute to stability and biomechanical properties in most tissues. Collagens play an important and multifunctional role in the peripheral and central nervous systems [40]. In the study of rats, collagen genes including col1a1, col1a2 and col5a2 in the cochlea were found to be reduced after loud or very loud noise exposure [41]. It is speculated that collagen proteins provide structural support within the cochlea, and the structures are damaged by excess noise and are subsequently degraded. Similarly, a number of transcripts encoding collagens (col1a2, col4a5, 6a3, col15a1, col18a1, loc104926245 and LOC104931259) in the brain of L. polyactis were down regulated by noise exposure in this study, suggesting the damage to the function of the brain.

4.4. Linkages between Behavioral Responses and Neurotransmitters

In mice, exposure to a 100 dB noise for 2 h caused excitotoxic trauma to the cochlear synapses and triggered excessive release of the neurotransmitter glutamate from the auditory sensory hair cells [42]. This loss of glutamate homeostasis may initiate secondary injury in the brain through the activation of cell death pathways [43]. In this study, L. polyactis showed increased locomotor behavior and tended to swim away from the noise source at the beginning of the noise exposure. This was accompanied by a release of glutamate [44], and accumulated glutamate will inevitably destroy the homeostasis of the neurotransmitters and impair the function of the brain. As expected, at the end of the noise exposure period, L. polyactis lost their balance and lay flat on the water, implying the loss of the balance neurotransmitters in the brain. A similar result was reported in rats exposed to noise stress of 100 dB: it was found that rats showed impaired motor coordination in the noise exposure group on Days 1 and 15 when compared with the control group. This impaired motor function could be attributed to the altered neurotransmitter levels in both the striatum and cerebellum in the brain [45].

5. Conclusions

In summary, using RNA-seq methods, we revealed a global view of gene transcript regulation in noise-exposed L. polyactis. We identified differentially expressed genes associated with the extracellular matrix and neurotransmitters in the brain of L. polyactis following noise exposure. Our findings may contribute to an in-depth elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of neurological dysfunction and impaired locomotor ability in L. polyactis after noise-induced stress responses.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani12162061/s1. Table S1. Differential gene expression analysis between the control group and the noise exposure group. Video S1. L. polyactis showed impaired locomotor ability after noise exposure for 0.5 h.

Author Contributions

X.Z. and H.Z. designed the study and wrote the manuscript. J.Z. and W.X. carried out the experiments and the formal analysis. J.L. and W.Z. provided technical guidance. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (2018YFD0900905) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41406150).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Shanghai Ocean University (series number: SHOU-DW-2021-022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the raw sequence data of RNA-seq have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession numbers PRJNA862477.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the editors and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions on this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pieretti, N.; Lo Martire, M.; Corinaldesi, C.; Musco, L.; Dell’Anno, A.; Danovaro, R. Anthropogenic noise and biological sounds in a heavily industrialized coastal area (Gulf of Naples, Mediterranean Sea). Mar. Environ. Res. 2020, 159, 105002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Voellmy, I.K.; Purser, J.; Simpson, S.D.; Radford, A.N. Increased noise levels have different impacts on the anti-predator behaviour of two sympatric fish species. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. McCormick, M.I.; Allan, B.; Harding, H.; Simpson, S.D. Boat noise impacts risk assessment in a coral reef fish but effects depend on engine type. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Popper, A.; Hastings, M. The effects of anthropogenic sources of sound on fishes. J. Fish Biol. 2009, 75, 455–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. McDonald, J.I.; Wilkens, S.L.; Stanley, J.A.; Jeffs, A.G. Vessel generator noise as a settlement cue for marine biofouling species. Biofouling 2014, 30, 741–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Popper, A.N.; Fay, R.R. Sound Detection and Processing by Fish: Critical Review and Major Research Questions (Part 2 of 2). Brain Behav. Evol. 1993, 41, 14–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Radford, A.N.; Emma, K.; Simpson, S.D. Acoustic communication in a noisy world: Can fish compete with anthropogenic noise? Behav. Ecol. 2014, 5, 1022–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. McCormick, M.I.; Fakan, E.P.; Nedelec, S.L.; Allan, B.J.M. Effects of boat noise on fish fast start escape response depend on engine type. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Simpson, S.D.; Radford, A.N.; Nedelec, S.L.; Ferrari, M.C.O.; Chivers, D.P.; McCormick, M.I.; Meekan, M.G. Anthropogenic noise increases fish mortality by predation. Nat. Commun. 2015, 7, 10544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Davidson, J.; Bebak, J.; Mazik, P. The effects of aquaculture production noise on the growth, condition factor, feed conversion, and survival of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture 2009, 288, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hang, S.; Zhao, J.; Ji, B.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, Z.; Zhou, F.; Ding, X.; Ye, Z. Impact of underwater noise on the growth, physiology and behavior of Micropterus salmoides in industrial recirculating aquaculture systems. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 291, 118152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zahra, J.; Kolb, B.E.; Mohajerani, M.H. Chronic traffic noise stress accelerates brain impairment and cognitive decline in mice. Exp. Neurol. 2018, 308, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang, X.; Lu, G.; Zhao, L.; Yang, Q.; Gao, T. Assessment of fishery resources using environmental DNA: Small yellow croaker (Larimichthys polyactis) in East China Sea. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0244495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, X.; Guo, H.; Chen, J.; Song, J.; Xu, K.; Lin, J.; Zhang, S. Potential effects of underwater noise from wind turbines on the marbled rockfish (Sebasticus marmoratus). J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2021, 37, 514–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xie, Q.P.; Zhan, W.; Shi, J.; Liu, F.; Niu, B.-L.; He, X.; Liu, M.; Liang, Q.; Xie, Y.; Xu, P.; et al. Whole-genome assembly and annotation of little yellow croaker (Larimichthys polyactis) provide insights into the evolution of hermaphroditism and gonochorism. Authorea Prepr. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  16. Anders, S.; Pyl, P.T.; Huber, W. HTSeq—A python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 166–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Robinson, M.D.; McCarthy, D.J.; Smyth, G.K. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huson, D.H.; Buchfink, B. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 59–60. [Google Scholar]
  19. Huerta-Cepas, J.; Forslund, K.; Coelho, L.P.; Szklarczyk, D.; Jensen, L.J.; von Mering, C.; Bork, P. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-mapper. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 2115–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, T.; Hu, E.; Xu, S.; Chen, M.; Guo, P.; Dai, Z.; Feng, T.; Zhou, L.; Tang, W.; Zhan, L.; et al. ClusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation 2021, 2, 100141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)). Method 2013, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schulz-Mirbach, T.; Ladich, F.; Riesch, R.; Plath, M. Otolith morphology and hearing abilities in cave- and surface-dwelling ecotypes of the Atlantic molly, Poecilia mexicana (Teleostei: Poeciliidae). Hear. Res. 2010, 267, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chapman, M.A. Interactions between cell adhesion and the synaptic vesicle cycle in Parkinson’s disease. Med. Hypotheses 2014, 83, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kujawa, S.G.; Liberman, M.C. Adding insult to injury: Cochlear nerve degeneration after ‘‘temporary’’ noise-induced hearing loss. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 14077–14085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Narinobu, J.; Muroyama, A.; Hiasa, M.; Omote, H.; Moriyama, Y. Vesicular Inhibitory Amino Acid Transporter Is a Cl−/γ-Aminobutyrate Co-transporter. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 35073–35078. [Google Scholar]
  26. Marrone, D.F.; Petit, T.L. Marrone, D.F.; Petit, T.L. The role of synaptic morphology in neural plasticity: Structural interactions underlying synaptic power. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 2002, 38, 291–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rabenstein, R.L.; Addy, N.A.; Caldarone, B.J.; Asaka, Y.; Gruenbaum, L.M.; Peters, L.L.; Gilligan, D.M.; Fitzsimonds, R.M.; Picciotto, M.R. Impaired synaptic plasticity and learning in mice lacking beta-adducin, an actin-regulating protein. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 2138–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Scott, D.A.; Tabarean, I.; Tang, Y.; Cartier, A.; Masliah, E.; Roy, S. A pathologic cascade leading to synaptic dysfunction in alpha-synuclein-induced neurodegeneration. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 8083–8095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nakano-Kobayashi, A.; Kasri, N.N.; Newey, S.E.; Van Aelst, L. The Rho-Linked Mental Retardation Protein OPHN1 Controls Synaptic Vesicle Endocytosis via Endophilin A1. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 1133–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bo, C.; Wu, M.; She, X.; Liu, H. Impulse noise exposure in rats causes cognitive deficits and changes in hippocampal neurotransmitter signaling and tau phosphorylation. Brain Res. 2012, 1427, 35–43. [Google Scholar]
  31. Manikandan, S.; Padma, M.K.; Srikumar, R.; Jeya Parthasarathy, N.; Muthuvel, A.; Sheela Devi, R. Effects of chronic noise stress on spatial memory of rats in relation to neuronal dendritic alteration and free radical-imbalance in hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 2006, 399, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Naqvi, F.; Haider, S.; Batool, Z.; Perveen, T.; Haleem, D.J. Subchronic exposure to noise affects locomotor activity and produces anxiogenic and depressive like behavior in rats. Pharmacol. Rep. 2012, 64, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yuen, E.Y.; Wei, J.; Liu, W.; Zhong, P.; Li, X.; Yan, Z. Repeated Stress Causes Cognitive Impairment by Suppressing Glutamate Receptor Expression and Function in Prefrontal Cortex. Neuron 2012, 73, 962–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Singewald, N.; Kouvelas, D.; Mostafa, A.; Sinner, C.; Philippu, A. Release of glutamate and GABA in the amygdala of conscious rats by acute stress and baroreceptor activation: Differences between SHR and WKY rats. Brain Res. 2000, 864, 138–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kazi, A.I.; Oommen, A. Chronic noise stress-induced alterations of glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid and their metabolism in the rat brain. Noise Health 2014, 16, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Schil, K.V.; Meire, F.; Karlstetter, M.; Bauwens, M.; Verdin, H.; Coppieters, F.; Scheiffert, E.; Van Nechel, C.; Langmann, T.; Deconinck, N.; et al. Early-onset autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia associated with retinal dystrophy: New human hotfoot phenotype caused by homozygous GRID2 deletion. Genet. Med. 2015, 17, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Frischknecht, R.; Gundelfinger, E.D. The brain’s extracellular matrix and its role in synaptic plasticity. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2012, 970, 153–171. [Google Scholar]
  38. Chen, Z.L.; Strickland, S. Neuronal death in the hippocampus is promoted by plasmin-catalyzed degradation of laminin. Cell 1997, 91, 917–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tsirka, S.E.; Rogove, A.D.; Bugge, T.H.; Degen, J.L.; Strickland, S. An extracellular proteolytic cascade promotes neuronal degeneration in the mouse hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 1997, 17, 543–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Monavarfeshani, A.; Knill, C.N.; Sabbagh, U.; Su, J.; Fox, M.A. Region- and cell-specific expression of transmembrane collagens in mouse brain. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jongkamonwiwat, N.; Ramirez, M.A.; Pak, K.; Ryan, A.F.; Savas, J.N. Noise Exposures Causing Hearing Loss Generate Proteotoxic Stress and Activate the Proteostasis Network. Cell Rep. 2020, 33, 108431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hu, N.; Rutherford, M.A.; Green, S.H. Protection of cochlear synapses from noise-induced excitotoxic trauma by blockade of Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2020, 117, 3828–3838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mzia, Z.; Nina, G.; Yousef, T.; Nadezhda, J.; Nino, P.; Fuad, R.; Eldar, G. Behavioral and neuroanatomical effects on exposure to White noise in rats. Neurosci. Lett. 2020, 728, 134898. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hakuba, N.; Koga, K.; Gyo, K.; Usami, S.I.; Tanaka, K. Exacerbation of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Mice Lacking the Glutamate Transporter GLAST. J. Neurosci. 2001, 20, 8750–8753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wankhar, W.; Srinivasan, S.; Sundareswaran, L.; Wankhar, D.; Rajan, R.; Sheeladevi, R. Role of Scoparia dulcis linn on noise-induced nitric oxide synthase (NOS) expression and neurotransmitter assessment on motor function in Wistar albino rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 86, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 12 02061 g001 550
Figure 1. Sound pressure levels (SPL) in the experimental tank during boat noise playback (boat noise in tank) and boat noise recorded in mussel farm water (boat noise in the field) and ambient conditions in the experimental tank without playback (ambient in tank). The main frequency of boat noise in the tank is between 100 and 200 Hz, and owing to the space limitations of the tank, the boat noise in the tank was nearly 10 dB higher than the boat noise in the field.
Figure 1. Sound pressure levels (SPL) in the experimental tank during boat noise playback (boat noise in tank) and boat noise recorded in mussel farm water (boat noise in the field) and ambient conditions in the experimental tank without playback (ambient in tank). The main frequency of boat noise in the tank is between 100 and 200 Hz, and owing to the space limitations of the tank, the boat noise in the tank was nearly 10 dB higher than the boat noise in the field.
Animals 12 02061 g001
Animals 12 02061 g002 550
Figure 2. Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes in the control group and noise exposure group. Each dot represents an individual gene. Red dots represent significantly up regulated genes; green dots represent significantly down regulated genes.
Figure 2. Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes in the control group and noise exposure group. Each dot represents an individual gene. Red dots represent significantly up regulated genes; green dots represent significantly down regulated genes.
Animals 12 02061 g002
Animals 12 02061 g003 550
Figure 3. Heat map of DEGs between the control group (Control) and the noise exposure group (Noise). The horizontal axis is the sample name, and the vertical axis is the normalized value of the differential gene in FPKM. Red color in the heat map indicates up regulated genes and green color indicates down regulated genes between groups.
Figure 3. Heat map of DEGs between the control group (Control) and the noise exposure group (Noise). The horizontal axis is the sample name, and the vertical axis is the normalized value of the differential gene in FPKM. Red color in the heat map indicates up regulated genes and green color indicates down regulated genes between groups.
Animals 12 02061 g003
Animals 12 02061 g004 550
Figure 4. The top 10 most significantly enriched Gene Ontology (GO) terms from the differentially expressed genes. The size of the dots represents the number of genes for different terms. The p.adjust values are indicated by changing colors, moving from red to blue.
Figure 4. The top 10 most significantly enriched Gene Ontology (GO) terms from the differentially expressed genes. The size of the dots represents the number of genes for different terms. The p.adjust values are indicated by changing colors, moving from red to blue.
Animals 12 02061 g004
Animals 12 02061 g005 550
Figure 5. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes between the control and noise exposure groups. The x-axis represents the enrichment factor for each of the differentially expressed genes in each pathway. The y-axis shows the name of the enriched pathway. The size of each node represents the number of enriched genes in that pathway, and the p.adjust values are indicated by changing colors, moving from red to blue.
Figure 5. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes between the control and noise exposure groups. The x-axis represents the enrichment factor for each of the differentially expressed genes in each pathway. The y-axis shows the name of the enriched pathway. The size of each node represents the number of enriched genes in that pathway, and the p.adjust values are indicated by changing colors, moving from red to blue.
Animals 12 02061 g005
Animals 12 02061 g006 550
Figure 6. Heatmap showing the change in ECM-related genes (collage and laminin) after noise exposure. Log2FC: Fold change of the gene expression level in the exposure group compared with the control group. Red color in the heat map indicates up regulated genes and blue color indicates down regulated genes in the exposure group compared with the control group.
Figure 6. Heatmap showing the change in ECM-related genes (collage and laminin) after noise exposure. Log2FC: Fold change of the gene expression level in the exposure group compared with the control group. Red color in the heat map indicates up regulated genes and blue color indicates down regulated genes in the exposure group compared with the control group.
Animals 12 02061 g006
Animals 12 02061 g007 550
Figure 7. Validation of the RNA-seq results using RT-qPCR methods. The gray columns indicate the RNA-seq results; the black columns indicate the real-time PCR results. The x-axis indicates the gene names; the y-axis represents the value of log2(fold change) of the noise exposure group compared with the control group.
Figure 7. Validation of the RNA-seq results using RT-qPCR methods. The gray columns indicate the RNA-seq results; the black columns indicate the real-time PCR results. The x-axis indicates the gene names; the y-axis represents the value of log2(fold change) of the noise exposure group compared with the control group.
Animals 12 02061 g007
Animals 12 02061 g008 550
Figure 8. Loss of balance in L. polyactis after noise exposure for 0.5 h.
Figure 8. Loss of balance in L. polyactis after noise exposure for 0.5 h.
Animals 12 02061 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Zhou, J.; Xu, W.; Zhan, W.; Zou, H.; Lin, J. Transcriptomic and Behavioral Studies of Small Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys polyactis) in Response to Noise Exposure. Animals 2022, 12, 2061. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12162061

AMA Style

Zhang X, Zhou J, Xu W, Zhan W, Zou H, Lin J. Transcriptomic and Behavioral Studies of Small Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys polyactis) in Response to Noise Exposure. Animals. 2022; 12(16):2061. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12162061

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xuguang, Jun Zhou, Wengang Xu, Wei Zhan, Huafeng Zou, and Jun Lin. 2022. "Transcriptomic and Behavioral Studies of Small Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys polyactis) in Response to Noise Exposure" Animals 12, no. 16: 2061. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12162061

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop