Next Article in Journal
Native Sheep Breeds in Poland—Importance and Outcomes of Genetic Resources Protection Programmes
Previous Article in Journal
Time Spent in a Maternity Pen during Winter Influences Cow and Calf Behavior in Pasture-Based Dairy Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Hereditary Basis of Coat Color and Excellent Feed Conversion Rate of Red Angus Cattle by Next-Generation Sequencing Data

1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China
2
Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100193, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(12), 1509; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121509
Submission received: 1 April 2022 / Revised: 24 May 2022 / Accepted: 7 June 2022 / Published: 9 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This study identified several variants and candidates with strong associations to coat color in Angus cattle by using genome sequencing data. In particular, the MC1R variants, which are a truncated MC1R protein obtained by altering the MCIR coding sequence region, result in lighter coat color and further enrich the genetic basis between DNA damage and melanin production caused. This study not only helped understand the hereditary basis of different coat colors, but also provided new ideas for future research on meat phenotypes. However, the putative candidate genes or markers identified in this study require further investigation to confirm their phenotypic causality and potential effective genetic relationships.

Abstract

Angus cattle have made remarkable contributions to the livestock industry worldwide as a commercial meat-type breed. Some evidence supported that Angus cattle with different coat colors have different feed-to-meat ratios, and the genetic basis of their coat color is inconclusive. Here, genome-wide association study was performed to investigate the genetic divergence of black and red Angus cattle with 63 public genome sequencing data. General linear model analysis was used to identify genomic regions with potential candidate variant/genes that contribute to coat color and feed conversion rate. Results showed that six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and two insertion–deletions, which were annotated in five genes (ZCCHC14, ANKRD11, FANCA, MC1R, and LOC532875 [AFG3-like protein 1]), considerably diverged between black and red Angus cattle. The strongest associated loci, namely, missense mutation CHIR18_14705671 (c.296T > C) and frameshift mutation CHIR18_12999497 (c.310G>-), were located in MC1R. Three consecutive strongly associated SNPs were also identified and located in FANCA, which is widely involved in the Fanconi anemia pathway. Several SNPs of highly associated SNPs was notably enriched in ZCCHC14 and ANKRD11, which are related to myofiber growth and muscle development. This study provides a basis for the use of potential genetic markers to be used in future breeding programs to improve cattle selection in terms of coat color and meat phenotype. This study is also helpful to understand the hereditary basis of different coat colors and meat phenotypes. However, the putative candidate genes or markers identified in this study require further investigation to confirm their phenotypic causality and potential effective genetic relationships.

1. Introduction

Angus cattle were certified in 1892 as one of the ancient British meat breeds native to Aberdeen in Northern Scotland. This breed has many excellent production performances. Its beef nutrients and meat quality occupy an irreplaceable position in the high-end beef market [1]. Many studies have been carried out on the meat quality traits [2,3], fecundity [4,5], and hybrid utilization [6] of Angus. In addition, Angus coat color (red and black) is a phenotype that can be directly observed within the breed [7]. Studies have implied that Angus cattle with red coats have better production performance (e.g., feed-to-meat and lean meat ratios) than black Angus [8]. However, the genetic basis of the coat color and economic traits of Angus remain unclear until now.
The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has led to the confirmation of the molecular basis of a large number of phenotypes in various domestic animals [9]. Although the genetic characteristics related to the coat color and feed conversion rate of Angus cattle have not been reported, a series of genes and pathways has been widely confirmed in other cattle breeds [10,11].
In this study, the wide genomic divergence of Angus cattle with different coat colors was investigated by using a NGS dataset to explain the hereditary basis of coat color and help understand the genetic determinants that may cause differences in production performance.

2. Materials and Methods

The public sequencing data of 63 Angus cattle, including 21 red Angus and 42 black Angus, obtained by a previous study [12] were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive Database (Table S1). High-quality reads (HQRs) were produced by filtering out reads fastp (The open-source code and corresponding instructions are available at https://github.com/OpenGene/fastp (accessed on 1 June 2021)) [13] on the basis of the https://github.com/OpenGene/fastp, custom filter parameters (cut window size 4 cut mean quality 15–5 3–3 3 length required 40). The HQRs were mapped to the cattle (Bos taurus) genome (ARS-UCD1.2) by using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (version v 0.7.15) (http://bio-bwa.sourceforge.net/ (accessed on 1 June 2021)) [14], and potential duplications were removed by Picard (version v2.1.1, http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/ (accessed on 1 June 2021)). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertion deletions (InDels) were identified and annotated by GATK Haplotype Caller [15] (version v4.1.9.0) and ANNOVAR [16]. The final VCF file was obtained using vcftools (version v0.1.16) software [17] with custom filter parameters (SNP: QD < 2.0, MQ < 40.0, FS > 60.0, SOR > 3.0, MQRankSum < −12.5, ReadPosRankSum < −8.0; Indel: QD < 2.0, FS > 200.0, SOR > 10.0, MQRankSum < −12.5, ReadPosRankSum < −8.0). Furthermore, the data quality control of SNP and InDel datasets was processed by PLINK (version v1.90b6.21, 64-bit, www.cog-genomics.org/plink/1.9/ (accessed on 1 June 2021)) and filtered by individuals with call rate >90% and minor allele frequency >0.99.
Coat color was divided into two categories. Red and black coats were as 1 and 2, respectively. For the genome-wide association study (GWAS), the SNP and InDel datasets were filtered by PLINK [18] (version v1.90b6.21, 64-bit) to exclude individuals with SNP deletion and individual deletion >0.05 and minimum allele frequency ≤0.01. The final SNP and InDel datasets for association analysis were assessed by PLINK with Chi-square test in general linear model [19]. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) annotations were performed by KOBAS 3.0 [20]. The GO terms that were obtained were visualized using the ClueGO [21] plugin in Cytoscape (https://cytoscape.org/ (accessed on 1 June 2021)).

3. Results and Discussion

Before GWAS was performed, 16,797,007 SNPs and 2,563,523 InDels were obtained from the sequenced datasets of 63 Angus cattle. Among them, 11,503,619 SNPs and 1,469,221 InDels were retained after filtering using PLINK to map the locus of coat color in Angus cattle by GWAS (Figure 1). Eight SNPs exceeded the Bonferroni significant threshold (p < 4.3464 × 10−9). Among them, six SNPs were located in the exon or intron of four functional genes (ANKRD11, FANCA, MC1R, and LOC532875 (AFG3-like protein 1)), and two SNPs were distributed in the intergenic sequence (Table S2). Furthermore, three of the eight SNPs were enriched in 51 GO terms, and 42 GO terms were remarkably enriched (Corrected p < 0.05). Seven of these GO terms were related to pigment synthesis (Table S3). The KEGG results (Table S4) revealed that two genes (FANCA and MC1R) were remarkably annotated (Corrected p < 0.05) in three known single pathways (Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway, melanogenesis, and neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction). The strongest association (SAM) with Corrected p = 5.461 × 10−15 was identified in CHIR18_14,705,671 (c.296T>C) in MC1R. In addition, two InDels (CHIR18_12999497 and CHIR18_14705684) located in MC1R and ZCCHC14, respectively, exceeded the Bonferroni significant threshold (p < 3.40316 × 10−8). These couple genes were remarkably enriched (Corrected p < 0.05) in 13 GO terms and two single pathways (melanogenesis and neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction Tables S5 and S6).
Previous studies verified that MC1R and its variant in the coding sequence region have an important and decisive influence on coat color in various mammals [22]. For example, c.844C > A (p281T> N) in cattle MC1R could cause threonine hydroxylation in melanin synthesis, resulting in the reddish coat color of cattle [23]. Both SAMs (c.296T > C and c.310G>-) from MC1R were already found in Asian cattle [24]. c.296T > C is a missense mutation that causes leucine (ED-type) to be replaced by proline (E+-type) at the 99th amino acid residue. Moreover, the ED-type MC1R individual remains sensitive and produces eumelanin [25]. In the present study, the results suggested that all red Angus individuals were E+/E+ homozygous, and the ED gene frequency of black Angus was 0.9125 at the c.296T > C locus (Table S7).
Subsequently, a series of studies showed that the key functional structure of MC1R protein includes seven transmembrane domains (TMDs) [26]. In the present study, the gene frequency of frame-shift mutation c.310G >- had an observable difference. For example, the frequency of e-type red Angus was 0.8824, and that of E-type black Angus was 0.9268. This result is consistent with that of previous studies on the variation of MC1R in cows with different coat colors [27]. In particular, the e genotype of c.310G >- prematurely generated the stop codon because of the shift in code translation, resulting in a truncated MC1R protein with only two TMDs (Figure 2). Coincidentally, a study suggested that the truncated MC1R protein as a non-functional or weakened receptor could preferentially induce the production of phomelanin and result in red coat color [26]. Evidences supported that amino-acid variation in MC1R is an important genetic basis for red hair in humans [28,29].
Notably, three consecutive strongly associated SNPs (CHIR18_14636355, CHIR18_14639215, and CHIR18_14643255) were annotated to FANCA, which is enriched in the FA pathway. FANCA mutations are most commonly observed in patients with FA [30,31], and they are one of the important causes of FA. The mutant could reduce the electron transfer between respiratory complexes I–III and reactive oxygen species detoxification enzyme [32] and damage mitochondrial autophagy [33]. Its clinical features include congenital malformations and hyperpigmentation [34,35]. A previous study suggested that FANCA protein may play a role in regulating the DNA damage repair system in the FA pathway [36]. Some studies confirmed that FAP could not deal with DNA damage in the interference of DNA replication, and the α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) secreted by DNA-damaged skin keratinocytes interacts with MC1R to enhance nucleotide excision repair in melanocytes [37]. Furthermore, some reports indicated a correlation between DNA damage and melanogenesis because of the function regulation of α-MSH [38].
Subsequently, a previous study stated that red Angus has a better gain-to-feed conversion rate than black Angus and that red cows are assigned to Canadian production category 1 (≥59% lean meat), whereas black cows have higher back fat thickness [8]. In the present study, a remarkable SNP (CHIR18_14759471) identified in LOC532875 could be associated with the excellent production performance of red Angus. AFG3, as a homolog of LOC532875 and a member of the subfamily of the AAA protein family, plays an important role in mitochondrial metabolism (MM) and oxidative phosphorylation (MOP) [39,40]. Rich evidence suggested that MM and MOP have a role in muscle and fat development [41,42]. In particular, a study suggested that meat-type poultry has higher feed efficiency and faster growth than laying-type poultry because the skeletal muscle mitochondria of broilers show higher oxidative phosphorylation efficiency than those of laying chickens [43].
Moreover, two significant SNPs (CHIR18_12999497 and CHIR18_14389309) that exceeded the threshold were annotated in ZCCHC14 and ANKRD11, respectively. Some studies determined that one cause of myotonic dystrophy is CCHC type zinc finger nucleic acid binding protein [44,45,46,47]. A series of widely confirmed muscle developmental genes (e.g., FHL3, MYOG, BAG3, SMAD3, and HIF1AN) [48], such as MYOG, which acts as an essential regulator of adult myofiber growth and muscle stem-cell homeostasis, interacted with ZCCHC14 [49]. ANKRD11 plays an important role in KBG syndrome [50]. It interacts with a series of muscle development-related genes (e.g., HDAC3, HDAC4, SRC, ARRB2, and APEX1) [51,52]. Which are involved in skeletal system development [53], the negative regulation of smooth muscle cell migration [54], and the positive regulation of cardiac muscle cell differentiation [55]. Coincidentally, although no direct evidence showed that ZCCHC14/ANKRD11 is related to MOP, a large number of genes (e.g., MYOD, SQSTM1, and KRAS) that have been proven to interact with these genes display a positive regulation in oxidative phosphorylation [56,57]. Therefore, these genes are not only may be related to the development of muscle phenotype in Angus cattle and but also affects the feed conversion rate by participating in the process of oxidative phosphorylation.
Finally, another remarkably divergent SNP (CHIR24_40137470) located in the intergenic region between LRRC30 and LOC781276 should not be ignored. LRRC26, as a family member of LRRC, is associated with the big potassium (BK)α subunit. LRRC26 could increase the channel voltage and apparent Ca2+ sensitivity in arterial muscle cells to induce vasodilation and maintain the expression of functional BK channel γ subunits in muscle cells [58,59]. Furthermore, LOC781276 attracted our attention as a serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 12 (SRSF12) pseudogene. SRSF12 is involved in the regulation of mRNA selective splicing and spliceosome tri-snRNP complex assembly [60,61]. Many studies clarified that the selective RNA splicing of key gene has an irreplaceable contribution to pigmentation [62] and muscle development [63,64].

4. Conclusions

The coat color and feed conversion rate/lean meat ratio of domestic animals are phenotype with complex molecular basis. In this study, a series of SNPs and InDels strongly diverged between red and black Angus, as identified by GWAS method. This study could help further understand the hereditary basis of these phenotypes and support the use of available molecular markers to improve cattle breeding.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani12121509/s1, Table S1. NCBI SRA information of 21 animals with red coat color and 42 animals with black coat color. Table S2. SNPs and InDels located in the exons or introns of functional genes. Table S3. Term enrichment of ANKRD11, FANCA, and MC1R. Table S4. Pathway enrichment of FANCA and MC1R. Table S5. Term enrichment of MC1R and ZCCHC14. Table S6. Pathway enrichment of MC1R. Table S7. Genotype frequencies of 10 variation sites in red and black Angus.

Author Contributions

G.E., Y.H. (Yongfu Huang), conceived and designed the experiments. S.W. analyzed the data. Y.H. (Yongmeng He) analyzed the data and wrote the paper. L.Z., H.G. supported the samples. G.E., Y.H. (Yongfu Huang) and Y.Z. provided funding. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Chongqing Natural Science Foundation grant number cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0013, National Natural Science Foundation of China grant number No. 31172195, Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier grant number cstc2018jcyjAX0153. Technology and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities grant number XDJK2018B014.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the sample data involved in this study are all from the NCBI database.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The sequencing data were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive Database (the accession number PRJNA176557 and PRJNA256210).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Meyerding, S.G.H.; Gentz, M.; Altmann, B.; Meier-Dinkel, L. Beef quality labels: A combination of sensory acceptance test, stated willingness to pay, and choice-based conjoint analysis. Appetite 2018, 127, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Aroeira, C.N.; de Almeida Torres Filho, R.; Fontes, P.R.; de Lemos Souza Ramos, A.; de Miranda Gomide, L.A.; Ladeira, M.M.; Ramos, E.M. Effect of freezing prior to aging on myoglobin redox forms and CIE color of beef from Nellore and Aberdeen Angus cattle. Meat Sci. 2017, 125, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Gagaoua, M.; Terlouw, E.M.C.; Picard, B. The study of protein biomarkers to understand the biochemical processes underlying beef color development in young bulls. Meat Sci. 2017, 134, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tait, R.G., Jr.; Cushman, R.A.; McNeel, A.K.; Casas, E.; Smith, T.P.L.; Freetly, H.C.; Bennett, G.L. μ-Calpain (CAPN1), calpastatin (CAST), and growth hormone receptor (GHR) genetic effects on Angus beef heifer performance traits and reproduction. Theriogenology 2018, 113, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Menegatti Zoca, S.; Shafii, B.; Price, W.; Utt, M.; Harstine, B.; McDonald, K.; Cruppe, L.; DeJarnette, M.; Peters, L.; Moraes Vasconcelos, J.L.; et al. Angus sire field fertility and in vitro sperm characteristics following use of different sperm insemination doses in Brazilian beef cattle. Theriogenology 2020, 147, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, T.; Wu, J.P.; Lei, Z.M.; Zhang, M.; Gong, X.Y.; Cheng, S.R.; Liang, Y.; Wang, J.F.; Senczuk, G.; Guerra, L.; et al. Fatty Acid Profile of Muscles from Crossbred Angus-Simmental, Wagyu-Simmental, and Chinese Simmental Cattles Fifteen Shades of Grey: Combined Analysis of Genome-Wide SNP Data in Steppe and Mediterranean Grey Cattle Sheds New Light on the Molecular Basis of Coat Color. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2020, 40, 563–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Taye, M.; Yoon, J.; Dessie, T.; Cho, S.; Oh, S.J.; Lee, H.K.; Kim, H. Deciphering signature of selection affecting beef quality traits in Angus cattle. Genes Genom. 2018, 40, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wolfger, B.; Quinn, C.J.; Torres, G.W.; Taylor, M.; Orsel, K. Comparison of feeding behavior between black and red Angus feeder heifers. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 96, 404–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Yum, S.Y.; Lee, S.J.; Kim, H.M.; Choi, W.J.; Park, J.H.; Lee, W.W.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, H.J.; Bae, S.H.; Lee, J.H.; et al. Efficient generation of transgenic cattle using the DNA transposon and their analysis by next-generation sequencing. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Trigo, B.B.; Utsunomiya, A.T.H.; Fortunato, A.; Milanesi, M.; Torrecilha, R.B.P.; Lamb, H.; Nguyen, L.; Ross, E.M.; Hayes, B.; Padula, R.C.M.; et al. Variants at the ASIP locus contribute to coat color darkening in Nellore cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol. GSE 2021, 53, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pegolo, S.; Cecchinato, A.; Savoia, S.; Di Stasio, L.; Pauciullo, A.; Brugiapaglia, A.; Bittante, G.; Albera, A. Genome-wide association and pathway analysis of carcass and meat quality traits in Piemontese young bulls. Anim. Int. J. Anim. Biosci. 2020, 14, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Stothard, P.; Liao, X.; Arantes, A.S.; De Pauw, M.; Coros, C.; Plastow, G.S.; Sargolzaei, M.; Crowley, J.J.; Basarab, J.A.; Schenkel, F.; et al. A large and diverse collection of bovine genome sequences from the Canadian Cattle Genome Project. GigaScience 2015, 4, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Chen, S.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gu, J. fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, i884–i890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Tian, S.; Yan, H.; Neuhauser, C.; Slager, S.L. An analytical workflow for accurate variant discovery in highly divergent regions. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Wang, K.; Li, M.; Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: Functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, e164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Danecek, P.; Auton, A.; Abecasis, G.; Albers, C.A.; Banks, E.; DePristo, M.A.; Handsaker, R.E.; Lunter, G.; Marth, G.T.; Sherry, S.T.; et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2156–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Marees, A.T.; de Kluiver, H.; Stringer, S.; Vorspan, F.; Curis, E.; Marie-Claire, C.; Derks, E.M. A tutorial on conducting genome-wide association studies: Quality control and statistical analysis. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 2018, 27, e1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Henderson, C.R. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 1975, 31, 423–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Xie, C.; Mao, X.; Huang, J.; Ding, Y.; Wu, J.; Dong, S.; Kong, L.; Gao, G.; Li, C.Y.; Wei, L. KOBAS 2.0: A web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, W316–W322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bindea, G.; Mlecnik, B.; Hackl, H.; Charoentong, P.; Tosolini, M.; Kirilovsky, A.; Fridman, W.H.; Pagès, F.; Trajanoski, Z.; Galon, J. ClueGO: A Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1091–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Miao, Y.; Wu, G.; Wang, L.; Li, D.; Tang, S.; Liang, J.; Mao, H.; Luo, H.; Zhang, Y. The role of MC1R gene in buffalo coat color. Sci. China. Life Sci. 2010, 53, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Goud, T.S.; Upadhyay, R.C.; Pichili, V.B.R.; Onteru, S.K.; Chadipiralla, K. Molecular characterization of coat color gene in Sahiwal versus Karan Fries bovine. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Ye, S.; Faruque, M.O.; Yu, Y.; Sun, D.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Y. New variants in the melanocortin 1 receptor gene (MC1R) in Asian cattle. Anim. Genet. 2014, 45, 609–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Klungland, H.; Våge, D.I.; Gomez-Raya, L.; Adalsteinsson, S.; Lien, S. The role of melanocyte-stimulating hormone (MSH) receptor in bovine coat color determination. Mamm. Genome 1995, 6, 636–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. García-Borrón, J.C.; Sánchez-Laorden, B.L.; Jiménez-Cervantes, C. Melanocortin-1 receptor structure and functional regulation. Pigment. Cell Res. 2005, 18, 393–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Matsumoto, H.; Kojya, M.; Takamuku, H.; Kimura, S.; Kashimura, A.; Imai, S.; Yamauchi, K.; Ito, S. MC1R c.310G>- and c.871G > A determine the coat color of Kumamoto sub-breed of Japanese Brown cattle. Anim. Sci. J. 2020, 91, e13367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, S.; Han, C.; Miao, X.; Li, X.; Yin, C.; Zou, J.; Liu, M.; Li, S.; Stawski, L.; Zhu, B.; et al. Targeting MC1R depalmitoylation to prevent melanomagenesis in redheads. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zorina-Lichtenwalter, K.; Lichtenwalter, R.N.; Zaykin, D.V.; Parisien, M.; Gravel, S.; Bortsov, A.; Diatchenko, L. A study in scarlet: MC1R as the main predictor of red hair and exemplar of the flip-flop effect. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2019, 28, 2093–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kimble, D.C.; Lach, F.P.; Gregg, S.Q.; Donovan, F.X.; Flynn, E.K.; Kamat, A.; Young, A.; Vemulapalli, M.; Thomas, J.W.; Mullikin, J.C.; et al. A comprehensive approach to identification of pathogenic FANCA variants in Fanconi anemia patients and their families. Hum. Mutat. 2018, 39, 237–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nie, D.; Cao, P.; Wang, F.; Zhang, J.; Liu, M.; Zhang, W.; Liu, L.; Zhao, H.; Teng, W.; Tian, W.; et al. Analysis of overlapping heterozygous novel submicroscopic CNVs and FANCA-VPS9D1 fusion transcripts in a Fanconi anemia patient. J. Hum. Genet. 2019, 64, 899–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cappelli, E.; Ravera, S.; Vaccaro, D.; Cuccarolo, P.; Bartolucci, M.; Panfoli, I.; Dufour, C.; Degan, P. Mitochondrial respiratory complex I defects in Fanconi anemia. Trends Mol. Med. 2013, 19, 513–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sumpter, R., Jr.; Sirasanagandla, S.; Fernández, Á.F.; Wei, Y.; Dong, X.; Franco, L.; Zou, Z.; Marchal, C.; Lee, M.Y.; Clapp, D.W.; et al. Fanconi Anemia Proteins Function in Mitophagy and Immunity. Cell 2016, 165, 867–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Moreno, O.M.; Paredes, A.C.; Suarez-Obando, F.; Rojas, A.; Andersson, L.; Haley, C.S.; Ellegren, H.; Knott, S.A.; Johansson, M.; Andersson, K.; et al. An update on Fanconi anemia: Clinical, cytogenetic and molecular approaches (Review) Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for growth and fatness in pigs. Biomed. Rep. 2021, 15, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sreedhar, A.; Aguilera-Aguirre, L.; Singh, K.K. Mitochondria in skin health, aging, and disease. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Niraj, J.; Färkkilä, A.; D’Andrea, A.D.; Bhat, B.; Singh, A.; Iqbal, Z.; Kaushik, J.K.; Rao, A.R.; Ahmad, S.M.; Bhat, H.; et al. The Fanconi Anemia Pathway in Cancer Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals the genetic basis of coat color variation in Pashmina goat. Annu. Rev. Cancer Biol. 2019, 3, 457–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jarrett, S.G.; Wolf Horrell, E.M.; Boulanger, M.C.; D’Orazio, J.A. Defining the Contribution of MC1R Physiological Ligands to ATR Phosphorylation at Ser435, a Predictor of DNA Repair in Melanocytes. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2015, 135, 3086–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lee, A.Y. Skin Pigmentation Abnormalities and Their Possible Relationship with Skin Aging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Casari, G.; De Fusco, M.; Ciarmatori, S.; Zeviani, M.; Mora, M.; Fernandez, P.; De Michele, G.; Filla, A.; Cocozza, S.; Marconi, R.; et al. Spastic paraplegia and OXPHOS impairment caused by mutations in paraplegin, a nuclear-encoded mitochondrial metalloprotease. Cell 1998, 93, 973–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Muid, K.A.; Kimyon, Ö.; Reza, S.H.; Karakaya, H.C.; Koc, A. Characterization of long living yeast deletion mutants that lack mitochondrial metabolism genes DSS1, PPA2 and AFG3. Gene 2019, 706, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Davies, K.L.; Camm, E.J.; Atkinson, E.V.; Lopez, T.; Forhead, A.J.; Murray, A.J.; Fowden, A.L. Development and thyroid hormone dependence of skeletal muscle mitochondrial function towards birth. J. Physiol. 2020, 598, 2453–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Dhanabalan, K.; Mzezewa, S.; Huisamen, B.; Lochner, A. Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation Function and Mitophagy in Ischaemic/Reperfused Hearts from Control and High-Fat Diet Rats: Effects of Long-Term Melatonin Treatment. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 2020, 34, 799–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Toyomizu, M.; Kikusato, M.; Kawabata, Y.; Azad, M.A.; Inui, E.; Amo, T. Meat-type chickens have a higher efficiency of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation than laying-type chickens. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2011, 159, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Larsen, M.; Kress, W.; Schoser, B.; Hehr, U.; Müller, C.R.; Rost, S. Identification of variants in MBNL1 in patients with a myotonic dystrophy-like phenotype. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2016, 24, 1467–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. André, L.M.; Ausems, C.R.M.; Wansink, D.G.; Wieringa, B. Abnormalities in Skeletal Muscle Myogenesis, Growth, and Regeneration in Myotonic Dystrophy. Front. Neurol. 2018, 9, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Braz, S.O.; Acquaire, J.; Gourdon, G.; Gomes-Pereira, M. Of Mice and Men: Advances in the Understanding of Neuromuscular Aspects of Myotonic Dystrophy. Front. Neurol. 2018, 9, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Renna, L.V.; Bosè, F.; Brigonzi, E.; Fossati, B.; Meola, G.; Cardani, R. Aberrant insulin receptor expression is associated with insulin resistance and skeletal muscle atrophy in myotonic dystrophies. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Luck, K.; Kim, D.K.; Lambourne, L.; Spirohn, K.; Begg, B.E.; Bian, W.; Brignall, R.; Cafarelli, T.; Campos-Laborie, F.J.; Charloteaux, B.; et al. A reference map of the human binary protein interactome. Nature 2020, 580, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ganassi, M.; Badodi, S.; Wanders, K.; Zammit, P.S.; Hughes, S.M. Myogenin is an essential regulator of adult myofibre growth and muscle stem cell homeostasis. eLife 2020, 9, e60445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gnazzo, M.; Lepri, F.R.; Dentici, M.L.; Capolino, R.; Pisaneschi, E.; Agolini, E.; Rinelli, M.; Alesi, V.; Versacci, P.; Genovese, S.; et al. KBG syndrome: Common and uncommon clinical features based on 31 new patients. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2020, 182, 1073–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hein, M.Y.; Hubner, N.C.; Poser, I.; Cox, J.; Nagaraj, N.; Toyoda, Y.; Gak, I.A.; Weisswange, I.; Mansfeld, J.; Buchholz, F.; et al. A human interactome in three quantitative dimensions organized by stoichiometries and abundances. Cell 2015, 163, 712–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Go, C.D.; Knight, J.D.R.; Rajasekharan, A.; Rathod, B.; Hesketh, G.G.; Abe, K.T.; Youn, J.Y.; Samavarchi-Tehrani, P.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, L.Y.; et al. A proximity-dependent biotinylation map of a human cell. Nature 2021, 595, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhao, J.; Shen, X.; Cao, X.; He, H.; Han, S.; Chen, Y.; Cui, C.; Wei, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, D.; et al. HDAC4 Regulates the Proliferation, Differentiation and Apoptosis of Chicken Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells. Animals 2020, 10, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Lee, D.Y.; Won, K.J.; Lee, K.P.; Jung, S.H.; Baek, S.; Chung, H.W.; Choi, W.S.; Lee, H.M.; Lee, B.H.; Jeon, B.H.; et al. Angiotensin II facilitates neointimal formation by increasing vascular smooth muscle cell migration: Involvement of APE/Ref-1-mediated overexpression of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2018, 347, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, Y.; Jin, L.; Song, Y.; Zhang, M.; Shan, D.; Liu, Y.; Fang, M.; Lv, F.; Xiao, R.P.; Zhang, Y. β-arrestin 2 mediates cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury via inhibiting GPCR-independent cell survival signalling. Cardiovasc. Res. 2017, 113, 1615–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rao, S.; Mondragón, L.; Pranjic, B.; Hanada, T.; Stoll, G.; Köcher, T.; Zhang, P.; Jais, A.; Lercher, A.; Bergthaler, A.; et al. AIF-regulated oxidative phosphorylation supports lung cancer development. Cell Res. 2019, 29, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Song, C.; Mitter, S.K.; Qi, X.; Beli, E.; Rao, H.V.; Ding, J.; Ip, C.S.; Gu, H.; Akin, D.; Dunn, W.A., Jr.; et al. Oxidative stress-mediated NFκB phosphorylation upregulates p62/SQSTM1 and promotes retinal pigmented epithelial cell survival through increased autophagy. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Noda, S.; Suzuki, Y.; Yamamura, H.; Giles, W.R.; Imaizumi, Y. Roles of LRRC26 as an auxiliary γ1-subunit of large-conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channels in bronchial smooth muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2020, 318, L366–L375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Evanson, K.W.; Bannister, J.P.; Leo, M.D.; Jaggar, J.H. LRRC26 is a functional BK channel auxiliary γ subunit in arterial smooth muscle cells. Circ. Res. 2014, 115, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. More, D.A.; Kumar, A. SRSF3: Newly discovered functions and roles in human health and diseases. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2020, 99, 151099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cowper, A.E.; Cáceres, J.F.; Mayeda, A.; Screaton, G.R. Serine-arginine (SR) protein-like factors that antagonize authentic SR proteins and regulate alternative splicing. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 48908–48914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Buskin, A.; Zhu, L.; Chichagova, V.; Basu, B.; Mozaffari-Jovin, S.; Dolan, D.; Droop, A.; Collin, J.; Bronstein, R.; Mehrotra, S.; et al. Disrupted alternative splicing for genes implicated in splicing and ciliogenesis causes PRPF31 retinitis pigmentosa. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Nikonova, E.; Kao, S.Y.; Spletter, M.L. Contributions of alternative splicing to muscle type development and function. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 104, 65–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Nakka, K.; Ghigna, C.; Gabellini, D.; Dilworth, F.J. Diversification of the muscle proteome through alternative splicing. Skelet. Muscle 2018, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. GWAS of autosomal SNPs in Angus cattle by using PLINK. (A) Manhattan plot of autosomal SNPs; (B) Manhattan plot of partial chromosome 18 SNPs (CHIR 18_10350193 to CHIR 18_16664071); (C) Q–Q plot of autosomal SNPs; (D) genotype frequencies of MC1R SNPs (c.296T> C); and (E) GO term enrichment of ANKRD11, FANCA, and MC1R as an interaction network constructed using the Cytoscape plug in ClueGO.
Figure 1. GWAS of autosomal SNPs in Angus cattle by using PLINK. (A) Manhattan plot of autosomal SNPs; (B) Manhattan plot of partial chromosome 18 SNPs (CHIR 18_10350193 to CHIR 18_16664071); (C) Q–Q plot of autosomal SNPs; (D) genotype frequencies of MC1R SNPs (c.296T> C); and (E) GO term enrichment of ANKRD11, FANCA, and MC1R as an interaction network constructed using the Cytoscape plug in ClueGO.
Animals 12 01509 g001
Figure 2. GWAS of autosomal InDels in Angus cattle by using PLINK. (A) Manhattan plot of autosomal InDels; (B) Manhattan plot of partial chromosome 18 InDels (CHIR 18_1831698 to CHIR 18_26780468); (C) Q–Q plot of autosomal InDels; (D) genotype Figure 1. R InDels (c.310G >–); (E) MC1R protein and truncated MC1R protein domains in cattle; and (F) GO term enrichment of MC1R and ZCCHC14 as an interaction network contrasted using ClueGO.
Figure 2. GWAS of autosomal InDels in Angus cattle by using PLINK. (A) Manhattan plot of autosomal InDels; (B) Manhattan plot of partial chromosome 18 InDels (CHIR 18_1831698 to CHIR 18_26780468); (C) Q–Q plot of autosomal InDels; (D) genotype Figure 1. R InDels (c.310G >–); (E) MC1R protein and truncated MC1R protein domains in cattle; and (F) GO term enrichment of MC1R and ZCCHC14 as an interaction network contrasted using ClueGO.
Animals 12 01509 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, Y.; Huang, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, L.; Gao, H.; Zhao, Y.; E, G. Hereditary Basis of Coat Color and Excellent Feed Conversion Rate of Red Angus Cattle by Next-Generation Sequencing Data. Animals 2022, 12, 1509. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121509

AMA Style

He Y, Huang Y, Wang S, Zhang L, Gao H, Zhao Y, E G. Hereditary Basis of Coat Color and Excellent Feed Conversion Rate of Red Angus Cattle by Next-Generation Sequencing Data. Animals. 2022; 12(12):1509. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121509

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Yongmeng, Yongfu Huang, Shizhi Wang, Lupei Zhang, Huijiang Gao, Yongju Zhao, and Guangxin E. 2022. "Hereditary Basis of Coat Color and Excellent Feed Conversion Rate of Red Angus Cattle by Next-Generation Sequencing Data" Animals 12, no. 12: 1509. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121509

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop