Molecular Characterization of 18S rDNA, ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI from Eimeria christenseni and E. arloingi in Goats from Shaanxi Province, Northwestern China
by
, and
Gaoxing Liang
†, 
Xin Yang
†,
Ding Liu
,
Yuan Li
,
Junwei Wang
,
Xi Chen
,
Guanghui Zhao
* and
Junke Song
* College of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2022, 12(11), 1340; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12111340
Submission received: 27 April 2022
/
Revised: 19 May 2022
/
Accepted: 20 May 2022
/
Published: 24 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Advances in Parasite Epidemiology and Population Genetics)
Abstract
:Simple Summary
This study first determined the 18S rDNA, ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI sequences of E. christenseni and E. arloingi. The lengths of the 18S rDNA, ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI were 1790 bp, 403 bp, 584 bp, and 1268 bp for E. arloingi and 1796 bp, 386 bp, 565 bp, and 1268 bp for E. christenseni, respectively. Furthermore, phylogenetic analyses based on the 18S rDNA, ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI loci were conducted to assess the relationship of E. christenseni, E. arloingi, and other Eimeria species in ruminants.
Abstract
Coccidiosis caused by Eimeria is one of the most common and significant diseases in goats, leading to serious economic losses in the development of the goat industry. Although several genetic loci, such as 18S rDNA, ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI, have been applied in the molecular characterization of Eimeria in chicken, rabbits, turkey, and wildlife, little is known about these molecular markers of Eimeria in goats. In the present study, we isolated purified oocysts of highly pathogenic Eimeria arloingi and Eimeria christenseni from fecal samples of goats in Shaanxi province, China, and then subjected these purified oocysts to genomic DNA isolation, PCR amplification, and sequencing of 18S rDNA, ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI loci of Eimeria arloingi and Eimeria christenseni. Finally, the obtained sequences were used for phylogenetic analysis of Eimeria species in goats and other livestock. The lengths of the 18S rDNA, ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI were 1790 bp, 403 bp, 584 bp, and 1268 bp for E. arloingi and 1796 bp, 386 bp, 565 bp, and 1268 bp for E. christenseni, respectively. The phylogenetical analysis based on 18S rDNA indicated that E. christenseni and E. arloingi were the most closely related to ovine Eimeria, followed by E. bovis, E. ellipsoidalis, and E. zuernii from cattle. The phylogenetical analysis based on ITS-1 and ITS-2 could not effectively distinguish ovine Eimeria from caprine Eimeria. The phylogenetical analysis based on the COI locus could effectively distinguish between Eimeria species from goats and cattle, but it was ineffective in distinguishing between Eimeria species from sheep and goats. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first characterization of 18S rDNA, ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI in E. arloingi and E. christenseni; it can provide useful genetic markers for molecular epidemiological and population genetic studies on E. arloingi and E. christenseni in goats and contribute to the prevention and control of goat coccidiosis.
1. Introduction
Coccidiosis is an important protozoosis caused by Eimeria spp., which mainly parasitizes the intestinal tract of various animals, including mammals, birds, reptiles, fish, and amphibians [1,2,3,4]. Recently, China became the country with the largest number of goats [5]. Coccidiosis, a common and significant disease in goats, has been widely reported in China [6,7,8]. A recent meta-analysis and systematic review indicated a total prevalence of 78.7% for Eimeria spp. in goats in China. A total of 12 species were identified in goats in China: E. arloingi (49.7%, 95% CI: 34.83–64.49), E. alijevi (43.7%, 95% CI: 29.53–58.45), E. christenseni (41.2%, 95% CI: 27.07–56.16), E. hirci (37.8%, 95% CI: 22.95–53.88), E. caprina (36.6%, 95% CI: 21.18–53.44), E. ninakohlyakimovae (35.9%, 95% CI: 21.02–52.31), E. jolchijevi (16.3%, 95% CI: 8.09–26.49), E. pallida (13.6%, 95% CI: 0.00–57.71), E. caprovina (12.1%, 95% CI: 4.92–21.6), E. apsheronica (9.71%, 95% CI: 5.21–15.35), E. kocharli 6.9% (3.01–12.16), and E. punctata (3.0%, 95% CI: 0.40–7.34) [8]. A previous paper reported that Eimeria oocysts were found in 97.3% of 584 fecal samples of goats in an epidemiological study in Shaanxi province, with six species recognized, namely E. jolchijevi, E. arloingi, E. alijevi, E. caprina, E. hirci, and E. christenseni. Among these six species, E. arloingi was the dominant species, with prevalences of 83.3% and 84.4% in Saanen and Guanzhong dairy goats. The prevalences were 81.6%, 68.4%, 51.7%, 29.5%, and 26.9% for E. alijevi, E. jolchijevi, E. caprina, E. hirci, and E. christenseni in Saanen dairy goats and 65.9%, 57.5%, 45.2%, 28.4%, and 20.7% for E. alijevi, E. jolchijevi, E. caprina, E. christenseni, and E. hirci in Guanzhong dairy goats, respectively [7]. The clinical symptoms of goats infected with coccidia include diarrhea, poor weight gain, weakness, and even death (particularly in kids), which significantly restrict the development of the goat industry [9,10].
Usually, host adaptations exist for the distribution of Eimeria species among animals. Eimeria arloingi and E. christenseni are currently regarded as the most highly pathogenic species among therecognized Eimeria species in goats [11,12,13]. Because of the differences in pathogenicity and drug resistance, rapid and accurate identification of Eimeria species is necessary for the effective prevention and treatment of coccidiosis in goats [9]. Traditionally, morphological observation of oocysts has been frequently used to identify species within caprine Eimeria; however, this approach is time-consuming, lacks specificity, and requires well-trained researchers [14]. To overcome the limitations of traditional morphological approaches, the molecular characterization of Eimeria species has been reported in Australia, India, Iran, Myanmar, and Oman and has proven to be useful to identify and classify these parasites, contributing to the understanding of the phylogenetic relationship among Eimeria species [15,16,17,18,19].
Recently, several genetic markers have been applied in the molecular characterization of Eimeria. One of the most common loci is the 18S rDNA, which has been used to define the phylogenetic relationship, inter- and intra-species variation among some Eimeria isolates [20]. Furthermore, the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS-1) region has also been used to establish molecular identification methods for Eimeria species from chicken and rabbits and has proved to be effective in clinical applications [21,22]. The mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase (COI) gene locus, which is present in many apicomplexan parasites, has also been used extensively for the identification and genotyping of species, including Eimeria species from turkey, ferret-badger and skink [18,23,24,25]. However, little is known about the genetic characteristics of these loci in Eimeria species from small ruminants, which limits the application of molecular biology techniques in the accurate classification of Eimeria species.
In this study, genomic DNA was isolated from purified E. christenseni oocysts and E. arloingi oocysts in goats and was then subjected to PCR amplification and sequencing of 18S rDNA, ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI loci. The obtained sequences of the four loci were subsequently used in phylogenetic analyses of Eimeria species. The results of the present study could contribute to the species identification, molecular epidemiology, and phylogenetic analyses of Eimeria species.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection
From September 2020 to February 2022, a total of 245 fecal samples were collected directly from the rectums of Saanen dairy goats aged <8 months on Farm SZ in Shaanxi province, northwestern China (Table 1). Farm SZ (105°29′ E, 31°42′ N) was a captive breeding farm with over 400 Saanen dairy goats, and no drugs were applied for deworming. The fecal samples were placed into separate bags marked with basic information, transported to the lab under cool conditions, and stored at 4 °C until use.
2.2. Conventional Fecal Examination of Eimeria Species
The coccidial infection of each fecal sample was examined by the flotation technique using saturated sodium chloride, with coccidian oocysts per gram (OPG) quantified using a modified McMaster technique. All samples of each age group were mixed with equal quality (2 g), homogenized in saturated sodium chloride, and centrifuged at 549× g for 5 min. The oocysts were isolated from the supernatant and transferred into a 2.5% (w/v) aqueous potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) solution for sporulation at 28 °C. Then, the sporified oocysts of each group were identified at the species level on the basis of the time of sporulation, oocyst size, and morphological characteristics (e.g., shape, color, form index, the presence or absence of the micropyle and its cap, and the presence or absence of residual, polar, and Stieda bodies) of the oocysts and sporocysts under 400 × magnification, as previously reported, and the proportion of each Eimeria species in the total examined sporified oocysts was counted as the species composition (%) [26].
2.3. Isolation of Oocysts for E. arloingi and E. christenseni
A total of nine species were found in sporulated oocysts in goats (Table 1). The sporulated oocysts of each group were mixed and diluted with 1× PBS (phosphate-buffered saline) and then added into the McMaster egg slide counting chamber for the isolation of purified oocysts for E. arloingi and E. christenseni using a modified disposable micro-blood sampling straw. Briefly, one end of the disposable micro-blood sampling straw (Zibo Laixu Medical Instrument Co., LTD, Zibo, China) was heated using a spirit lamp to produce a thinner tip. A single oocyst from the McMaster egg slide counting chamber was isolated under 100× magnification using the modified disposable micro-blood sampling straw. Oocysts from the same species were collected in a clean PCR tube. Finally, 50 E. christenseni oocysts and 50 E. arloingi oocysts were isolated and collected in two separate PCR tubes for DNA extraction.
2.4. DNA Extraction
PCR tubes containing purified oocysts from E. christenseni and E. arloingi were briefly centrifuged and subjected to repeated freezing and thawing four times to disrupt the oocyst walls. Then, genomic DNA was extracted from the oocysts using DNeasy® PowerSoil® Pro Kit soil Genome Extraction Kit (Cat. No. 47014, Qiagen, Dusseldorf, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the extracted DNA (100 μL) was stored at −20 °C for future use.
2.5. PCR Amplification
The 18S rDNA, ITS, and COI sequence for E. christenseni and E. arloingi were obtained by PCR using general primers as reported (Table 2). PCR (25 μL) was conducted in a reaction mixture containing 1× Ex Taq buffer (Mg2+ free), 2 mM MgCl2, a 0.2 mM dNTP mixture, 0.625 U TaKaRa Ex Taq, 0.4 μΜ concentrations of each primer, and 2 μL gDNA under the following conditions: initial denaturing at 94 °C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturing at 94 °C for 45 s; annealing at 57 °C (18S rDNA), 52 °C (ITS), or 49 °C (COI) for 30 s; extension at for 72 °C for 90 s; and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. All amplicons were examined by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel with ethidium bromide, and positive amplicons were purified using the Universal DNA Purification Kit, cloned into the pMD19-T vector, and transformed into Escherichia coli JM109. Then, the positive transformants were confirmed by PCR under the above-mentioned conditions and sequenced by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) using an ABI 730 Autosequencer.
2.6. Sequence Analysis
All the obtained sequences were confirmed to be the corresponding loci using BLAST alignment from NCBI (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed date: 20 May 2021) and aligned with reference sequences downloaded from GenBank using Clustal X 1.83 (ftp://ftpigbmc.u-strasbg.fr/pub/ClustalX/, accessed date: 25 May 2021). To identify the phylogenetic relationships of E. christenseni and E. arloingi with selected Eimeria species, four trees based on 18S rDNA, ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI sequences were constructed using the Neighbor-Joining (N-J) method in MEGA 6.06 [28]. The Kimurás two-parameter method was used with bootstrap evaluation of 1000 replicates.
2.7. Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers
The representative nucleotide sequences of 18S rDNA, ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI of E. christenseni and E. arloingi were submitted to the GenBank database under the accession numbers ON259585–ON259586, ON261603–ON261604, ON261608–ON261609 and ON245513–ON245514.
3. Results
3.1. Conventional Fecal Examination of Eimeria Species
The total prevalence of Eimeria spp. in our study was 95.92% (235/245), with the highest prevalence (100%) in goats aged 2–3 months, 4–5 months, 5–6 months, 6–7 months, and 7–8 months, while lowest prevalence (82.14%) was in goats aged 1–2 months. As for the infection intensity of Eimeria spp. in each age group, the highest OPG was found in goats aged 2–3 months (162,080 ± 405,852), while the lowest was found in goats aged 7–8 months (7738 ± 6229) (Table 1). Furthermore, Eimeria oocysts in each group were sporulated for species identification and composition analyses, and nine Eimeria species were identified in each age group (Table 1), namely E. christenseni, E. arloingi, E. ninakohlyakimovae, E. hirci, E. jolchijevi, E. alijevi, E. caprina, E. caprovina, and E. apsheronica (Figure 1), with E. christenseni and E. arloingi being the major species.
3.2. Characterization of 18S rDNA of E. christenseni and E. arloingi
The obtained partial 18S rDNA sequences of E. arloingi and E. christenseni were 1790 bp and 1796 bp in length, respectively. Then, we used the 18S rDNA sequences of E. arloingi, E. christenseni, another 13 species from ruminant animals (E. weybridgensis, E. crandallis, E. ahsata, E. zuernii, E. bovis, E. ellipsoidalis, E. canadensis, E. auburnensis, E. cylindrica, E. wyomingensis, E. subspherica, E. bukidnonensis, and E. alabamensis), and E. tenella from chicken for a genetic relationship analysis (Figure 2). The tree consisted of two large clades with 99% support: one contained three, two, and seven species from sheep, goats, and cattle, respectively; the other contained three species from cattle. E. arloingi and E. christenseni from goats in this study were included in the same branch with species from sheep and had a relatively close relationship with E. weybridgensis, E. crandallis, and E. ahsata from sheep, followed by species from cattle.
3.3. Characterization of ITS-1 of E. christenseni and E. arloingi
The full ITS-1 sequences of E. arloingi and E. christenseni were 403 bp and 386 bp in length, respectively. Subsequently, we used the ITS-1 sequences of E. arloingi, E. christenseni, another 17 selected ruminant species, and one chicken species (E. tenella) for a genetic relationship analysis (Figure 3). The tree consisted of three large clades: one contained eight and three species from sheep and goats, respectively, and the other two clades contained four cattle species each. E. arloingi and E. christenseni from goats in this study had a relatively close relationship with E. arloingi (KC507793) from goats, followed by species from sheep and cattle.
3.4. Characterization of ITS-2 of E. christenseni and E. arloingi
The full ITS-2 sequences of E. arloingi and E. christenseni were 584 bp and 565 bp in length, respectively. Then, we used the ITS-2 sequences of E. arloingi, E. christenseni, another 10 selected ruminant species, and one chicken species (E. tenella) for a genetic relationship analysis (Figure 4). The tree consisted of two large clades: one contained seven and two species from cattle and goats, respectively, and the other contained three species from cattle. E. arloingi and E. christenseni from goats in this study were included in one separate branch and had a relatively close relationship with E. bovis, E. zuernii, and E. ellipsoidalis from cattle.
3.5. Characterization of COI of E. christenseni and E. arloingi
The partial COI sequences of both E. arloingi and E. christenseni were 1268 bp in length. Subsequently, we used the COI sequences of E. arloingi, E. christenseni, another six selected ruminant species, and one chicken species (E. tenella) for a genetic relationship analysis (Figure 5). E. arloingi and E. christenseni from goats in this study were included in one separate branch and had a relatively close relationship with E. bovis and E. zuernii from cattle, followed by species from sheep and goats. The comparative analysis results of the similarities between the COI sequences showed that the percent identity among Eimeria species from sheep and goats was 94.4–98.9%, and the percent identity between E. ahsata from sheep and other Eimeria species from goats was 95.3–98.3% (Table 3).
4. Discussion
Goat farming is an important part of animal husbandry in China [5]. At present, goat coccidiosis seriously affects the milk, meat, and other production traits of goats, causing huge economic losses in the world; goat coccidiosis has become one of the problems hindering the healthy development of the goat farming industry [13]. The present study first determined the 18S rDNA, ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI sequences of E. arloingi and E. christenseni and analyzed the phylogenetic relationship of E. arloingi, E. christenseni, and other reported representative Eimeria species available in GenBank, which could contribute to the understanding of the biology, molecular epidemiology, and population diversity of Eimeria species. In addition, it will also help support the host adaptation of Eimeria species of different animals, including sheep, goats, and cattle.
The 18S rDNA locus has been used extensively as a molecular marker in phylogenetic analysis. In the present study, the phylogenetic tree based on the 18S rDNA sequence showed that E. christenseni and E. arloingi were the most closely related to ovine Eimeria, followed by E. bovis, E. ellipsoidalis, and E. zuernii from cattle. Unfortunately, caprine Eimeria and ovine Eimeria were not effectively distinguished. Since the 18S rDNA is a conservative gene among Eimeria species, it is better to combine it with other gene loci (e.g., ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI) to comprehensively understand their phylogenetic relationship [15,19,20].
The ITS-1 locus is also a common marker for phylogenetic analysis [22]. In this study, although caprine Eimeria (E. arloingi and E. christenseni) were placed on two separate branches in the phylogenetic tree based on the ITS-1 region, they may not be effectively distinguished from ovine Eimeria because of low bootstrap values. Hence, it is suggested that the ITS-1 sequence may not be a useful marker for the understanding of phylogenetic relationships among Eimeria species from ruminants. Similarly, the ITS-2 locus may also not be a suitable marker to reveal the relationships among Eimeria species, but this needs to be verified in more sequences.
Partial COI sequences could provide more sufficient variability, which is needed to distinguish species efficiently, than complete 18S rDNA sequences from the same taxa using different Eimeria species from chicken [20]. In this study, although the COI locus could effectively distinguish Eimeria species from goats and cattle, it was ineffective in distinguishing between Eimeria species from sheep and goats, primarily because of the low resolution achieved here using a partial sequence of ~640 bp.
Now that the 18S rDNA, ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI sequences of two highly pathogenic Eimeria species in goats are available, it will be interesting to conduct comprehensive studies to understand the biology, epidemiology, and population diversity of these Eimeria species by integrating conventional morphological examination with PCR analysis. Notably, multiple loci with high resolution are needed in the phylogenetic analyses of Eimeria species in ruminants instead of only one locus.
5. Conclusions
The total prevalence of Eimeria spp. was 95.92% in goats in the present study with nine species recognized, namely E. christenseni, E. arloingi, E. ninakohlyakimovae, E. alijevi, E. jolchijevi, E. hirci, E. caprina, E. apsheronica, and E. caprovina. This is the first report of 18S rDNA, ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI sequences of E. christenseni and E. arloingi. The obtained sequences should be useful as sources for genetic markers for molecular epidemiological and population genetic studies on E. christenseni and E. arloingi in goats.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, J.S. and G.Z.; methodology, G.L. and X.Y.; software, D.L.; validation, Y.L.; formal analysis, J.W.; investigation, X.C.; data curation, G.L.; writing—original draft preparation, G.L.; writing—review and editing, X.Y. and G.L.; visualization, X.Y. and G.L.; supervision, J.S. and G.Z.; project administration, J.S. and G.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was funded by the grants from the general projects of key R&D plans in Shaanxi Province (grant no. 2020NY-006), the Innovation Support Plan of Shaanxi Province (grant no. 2021TD-31), and the Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province (grant no. 2022NY-097).
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was conducted under the approval and instructions of the ethics committee of Northwest A&F University (No. 2020008) and the animal ethics requirements of the People’s Republic of China.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data are contained within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Blake, D.P.; Worthing, K.; Jenkins, M.C. Exploring Eimeria Genomes to Understand Population Biology: Recent Progress and Future Opportunities. Genes 2020, 11, 1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sazmand, A.; Bahari, A.; Papi, S.; Otranto, D. Parasitic diseases of equids in Iran (1931–2020): A literature review. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Trejo-Huitrón, G.; Bautista-Gómez, L.G.; Martínez-Castañeda, J.S.; Romero-Núñez, C.; Trejo-Castro, L.; Espinosa-Ayala, E. Morphological characterization and first molecular identification of the eleven Eimeria species that infect sheep from Mexico. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walker, R.A.; Ferguson, D.J.; Miller, C.M.; Smith, N.C. Sex and Eimeria: A molecular perspective. Parasitology 2013, 140, 1701–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, R.J.; Wang, Z.Y.; Zhang, Y.J.; Su, R. Analysis on Key Factors Restricting Sustainable Development of Goat Industry. J. Domest. Anim. Ecol. 2020, 41, 77–81. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Wang, C.R.; Xiao, J.Y.; Chen, A.H.; Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Gao, J.F.; Zhu, X.Q. Prevalence of coccidial infection in sheep and goats in northeastern China. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 174, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, G.H.; Lei, L.H.; Shang, C.C.; Gao, M.; Zhao, Y.Q.; Chen, C.X.; Chen, D.K. High prevalence of Eimeria infection in dairy goats in Shaanxi province, northwestern China. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2012, 44, 943–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diao, N.C.; Zhao, B.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Q.; Chen, Z.Y.; Yang, Y.; Sun, Y.H.; Shi, J.F.; Li, J.M.; Shi, K.; et al. Prevalence of Eimeria spp. among goats in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 806085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keeton, S.T.N.; Navarre, C.B. Coccidiosis in Large and Small Ruminants. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2018, 34, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bangoura, B.; Bardsley, K.D. Ruminant Coccidiosis. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2020, 36, 187–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koudela, B.; Boková, A. Coccidiosis in goats in the Czech Republic. Vet. Parasitol. 1998, 76, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Young, G.; Alley, M.L.; Foster, D.M.; Smith, G.W. Efficacy of amprolium for the treatment of pathogenic Eimeria species in Boer goat kids. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 178, 346–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de-Macedo, L.O.; Bezerra-Santos, M.A.; de-Mendonça, C.L.; Alves, L.C.; Ramos, R.; de-Carvalho, G.A. Prevalence and risk factors associated with infection by Eimeria spp. in goats and sheep in Northeastern Brazil. J. Parasit. Dis. 2020, 44, 607–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Joyner, L.P.; Long, P.L. The specific characters of the Eimeria, with special reference to the Coccidia of the fowl. Avian. Pathol. 1974, 3, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khodakaram-Tafti, A.; Hashemnia, M.; Razavi, S.M.; Sharifiyazdi, H.; Nazifi, S. Genetic characterization and phylogenetic analysis of Eimeria arloingi in Iranian native kids. Parasitol. Res. 2013, 112, 3187–3192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, R.; Sharma, D.K.; Gururaj, K.; Paul, S.; Banerjee, P.S.; Tiwari, J. Molecular epidemiology and point mutations in ITS1 and 18S rDNA genes of Eimeria ninakohlyakimovae and E. christenseni isolated from Indian goats. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2017, 9, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Habsi, K.; Ali, H.; Al-Kharousi, K.; Elshafie, E.I.; Al-Busaidi, R.; Muhiuddin, A.; Johnson, E.H. Vitamin B12 deficiency in newly weaned goat kids associated with clinical infection with Eimeria arloingi. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2020, 29, e005920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Habsi, K.; Yang, R.; Ryan, U.; Miller, D.W.; Jacobson, C. Morphological and molecular characterization of three Eimeria species from captured rangeland goats in Western Australia. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2017, 9, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bawm, S.; Win, T.Z.B.; Win, S.Y.; Htun, L.L.; Nakao, R.; Katakura, K. First detection of Eimeria species in Myanmar domestic goats with both microscopic and molecular methods. Parasite 2020, 27, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogedengbe, J.D.; Hanner, R.H.; Barta, J.R. DNA barcoding identifies Eimeria species and contributes to the phylogenetics of coccidian parasites (Eimeriorina, Apicomplexa, Alveolata). Int. J. Parasitol. 2011, 41, 843–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, U.C.; Fraga, J.S.; Licois, D.; Pakandl, M.; Gruber, A. Development of molecular assays for the identification of the 11 Eimeria species of the domestic rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 176, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lew, A.E.; Anderson, G.R.; Minchin, C.M.; Jeston, P.J.; Jorgensen, W.K. Inter-and intra-strain variation and PCR detection of the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS-1) sequences of Australian isolates of Eimeria species from chickens. Vet. Parasitol. 2003, 112, 33–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofmannová, L.; Jirků, M.; Mazánek, S.; Gremlicová, D.; Kvičerová, J. Eimeria melogale n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) in the Javan ferret-badger (Melogale orientalis). Eur. J. Protistol. 2020, 73, 125668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Imai, R.K.; Barta, J.R. Distribution and abundance of Eimeria species in commercial turkey flocks across Canada. Can. Vet. J. 2019, 60, 153–159. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, R.; Brice, B.; Bennett, M.D.; Eliott, A.; Ryan, U. Novel Eimeria sp. isolated from a King’s skink (Egernia kingii) in Western Australia. Exp. Parasitol. 2013, 133, 162–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Eckert, J.; Braun, R.; Shirley, M.W.; Coudert, P. Guidelines on Techniques in Coccidiosis Research; OPOCE: Luxembourg, 1995; pp. 103–117. [Google Scholar]
- Schwarz, R.S.; Jenkins, M.C.; Klopp, S.; Miska, K.B. Genomic analysis of Eimeria spp. populations in relation to performance levels of broiler chicken farms in Arkansas and North Carolina. J. Parasitol. 2009, 95, 871–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1.
Morphological examination of sporulated oocysts of nine Eimeria species identified in goats in the present study. (A–I) Sporulated oocysts of E. ninakohlyakimovae, E. hirci, E. alijevi, E. jolchijevi, E. christenseni, E. arloingi, E. caprina, E. caprovina, and E. apsheronica, respectively.
Figure 1.
Morphological examination of sporulated oocysts of nine Eimeria species identified in goats in the present study. (A–I) Sporulated oocysts of E. ninakohlyakimovae, E. hirci, E. alijevi, E. jolchijevi, E. christenseni, E. arloingi, E. caprina, E. caprovina, and E. apsheronica, respectively.
Figure 2.
Phylogenetic tree generated by the Neighbor-Joining method using partial sequences of the 18S rDNA region of E. christenseni and E. arloingi from the present study and representative sequences of other Eimeria species available in GenBank. The sequences obtained in this study are marked with red triangles (bootstrap values below 75% are not indicated).
Figure 2.
Phylogenetic tree generated by the Neighbor-Joining method using partial sequences of the 18S rDNA region of E. christenseni and E. arloingi from the present study and representative sequences of other Eimeria species available in GenBank. The sequences obtained in this study are marked with red triangles (bootstrap values below 75% are not indicated).
Figure 3.
Phylogenetic tree generated by the Neighbor-Joining method using full sequences of the ITS-1 region of E. christenseni and E. arloingi from the present study and representative sequences of other Eimeria species available in GenBank. The sequences obtained in this study are marked with red triangles (bootstrap values below 75% are not indicated).
Figure 3.
Phylogenetic tree generated by the Neighbor-Joining method using full sequences of the ITS-1 region of E. christenseni and E. arloingi from the present study and representative sequences of other Eimeria species available in GenBank. The sequences obtained in this study are marked with red triangles (bootstrap values below 75% are not indicated).
Figure 4.
Phylogenetic tree generated by the Neighbor-Joining method using full sequences of the ITS-2 region of E. christenseni and E. arloingi from the present study and representative sequences of other Eimeria species available in GenBank. The sequences obtained in this study are marked with red triangles (bootstrap values below 75% are not indicated).
Figure 4.
Phylogenetic tree generated by the Neighbor-Joining method using full sequences of the ITS-2 region of E. christenseni and E. arloingi from the present study and representative sequences of other Eimeria species available in GenBank. The sequences obtained in this study are marked with red triangles (bootstrap values below 75% are not indicated).
Figure 5.
Phylogenetic tree generated by the Neighbor-Joining method using partial sequences of the COI region of E. christenseni and E. arloingi from the present study and representative sequences of other Eimeria species available in GenBank. The sequences obtained in this study are marked with red triangles (bootstrap values below 75% are not indicated).
Figure 5.
Phylogenetic tree generated by the Neighbor-Joining method using partial sequences of the COI region of E. christenseni and E. arloingi from the present study and representative sequences of other Eimeria species available in GenBank. The sequences obtained in this study are marked with red triangles (bootstrap values below 75% are not indicated).
Table 1.
Occurrence of Eimeria spp. and species composition in goats on Farm SZ.
| Age | No. Tested | No. Positive (%) | OPG (Mean ± SD) | Species Composition (%) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECH a | EAR b | ENI c | EAL d | EJO e | EHI f | ECI g | EAP h | ECO i | Others | ||||
| <1 month | 13 | 11 (84.62) | 8739 ± 18,778 | 6.11 | 40.46 | 28.24 | 5.34 | 0.00 | 16.79 | 1.53 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 1–2 months | 28 | 23 (82.14) | 7989 ± 13,430 | 41.98 | 26.72 | 8.40 | 1.53 | 0.76 | 15.27 | 3.05 | 5.34 | 1.53 | 0.76 |
| 2–3 months | 39 | 39 (100) | 162,080 ± 405,852 | 37.86 | 12.86 | 15.71 | 4.29 | 0.00 | 12.14 | 2.14 | 5.71 | 7.14 | 2.14 |
| 3–4 months | 76 | 73 (96.05) | 82,345 ± 341,874 | 17.07 | 28.46 | 17.89 | 4.88 | 1.63 | 17.89 | 2.44 | 2.44 | 6.50 | 0.81 |
| 4–5 months | 33 | 33 (100) | 86,497 ± 165,841 | 29.29 | 23.57 | 18.57 | 3.57 | 0.71 | 9.29 | 3.57 | 4.29 | 6.43 | 0.71 |
| 5–6 months | 12 | 12 (100) | 27,725 ± 26,902 | 36.43 | 10.00 | 12.14 | 2.14 | 0.71 | 5.71 | 2.14 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 2.14 |
| 6–7 months | 20 | 20 (100) | 11,290 ± 9967 | 24.29 | 23.57 | 11.43 | 4.29 | 0.00 | 3.57 | 1.43 | 2.14 | 4.29 | 0.71 |
| 7–8 months | 24 | 24 (100) | 7738 ± 6229 | 0.00 | 42.15 | 22.31 | 6.61 | 4.13 | 15.70 | 1.65 | 3.31 | 3.31 | 0.83 |
| Total | 245 | 235 (95.92) | 67,409 ± 260,945 | 24.13 | 25.97 | 16.84 | 4.08 | 0.99 | 12.05 | 2.24 | 3.72 | 4.27 | 1.01 |
a/b/c/d/e/f/g/h/iE. christenseni/E. arloingi/E. ninakohlyakimovae/E. alijevi/E. jolchijev/E. hirci/E. caprina/E. apsheronica/E. caprovina.
Table 2.
Primers used in this study.
| Target | Primer ID | Sequence (5′–3′) | Amplicon Size (bp) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18S rDNA | ERIB1 | ACCTGGTTGATCCTGCCAG | ~1790 | [27] |
| ERIB10 | CTTCCGCAGGTTCACCTACGG | |||
| ITS1-ITS2 | ITS-1 | GGATGCAAAAGTCGTAACACGG | ~1010 | [27] |
| ITS-2 | TCCTCCGCTTAATAATATGC | |||
| COI | COI_UNI_199F | ATGATYTTCTTTGTAGTTATGCC | ~1272 | [24] |
| mtRNA20_UNI | GTATGGATTTCACGGTCAA |
Table 3.
Pairwise identities (%) among the COI sequences of E. christenseni and E. arloingi, E. ahsata, and E. hirci.
Table 3.
Pairwise identities (%) among the COI sequences of E. christenseni and E. arloingi, E. ahsata, and E. hirci.
| Sample Code | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | E. christenseni ON245513 | - | ||||||||
| 2 | E. arloingi ON245514 | 98.4 | - | |||||||
| 3 | E. ahsata KT184373 | 96.7 | 96.6 | - | ||||||
| 4 | E. christenseni KX857468 | 96.9 | 96.2 | 98.3 | - | |||||
| 5 | E. christenseni LC508121 | 96.9 | 96.7 | 97.8 | 98.9 | - | ||||
| 6 | E. arloingi LC508123 | 95.6 | 95.5 | 96.4 | 97.2 | 98.0 | - | |||
| 7 | E. arloingi KX857470 | 94.8 | 94.4 | 95.3 | 96.4 | 96.9 | 98.6 | - | ||
| 8 | E. hirci KX857469 | 95.3 | 94.8 | 95.8 | 97.2 | 97.3 | 98.4 | 97.7 | - | |
| 9 | E. hirci LC508122 | 96.6 | 96.4 | 96.9 | 98.0 | 98.8 | 98.4 | 97.3 | 98.4 | - |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Liang, G.; Yang, X.; Liu, D.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Zhao, G.; Song, J. Molecular Characterization of 18S rDNA, ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI from Eimeria christenseni and E. arloingi in Goats from Shaanxi Province, Northwestern China. Animals 2022, 12, 1340. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12111340
AMA Style
Liang G, Yang X, Liu D, Li Y, Wang J, Chen X, Zhao G, Song J. Molecular Characterization of 18S rDNA, ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI from Eimeria christenseni and E. arloingi in Goats from Shaanxi Province, Northwestern China. Animals. 2022; 12(11):1340. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12111340
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiang, Gaoxing, Xin Yang, Ding Liu, Yuan Li, Junwei Wang, Xi Chen, Guanghui Zhao, and Junke Song. 2022. "Molecular Characterization of 18S rDNA, ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI from Eimeria christenseni and E. arloingi in Goats from Shaanxi Province, Northwestern China" Animals 12, no. 11: 1340. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12111340
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
