Next Article in Journal
Knowledge of, and Attitudes towards, Live Fish Transport among Aquaculture Industry Stakeholders in China: A Qualitative Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Weaning at 21 Days of Age on the Content of Bile Acids in Chyme of Cecum
Previous Article in Journal
Possibility of Using House Cricket (Acheta domesticus) or Mulberry Silkworm (Bombyx mori) Pupae Meal to Replace Poultry Meal in Canine Diets Based on Health and Nutrient Digestibility
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enzyme-Treated Soybean Meal Enhanced Performance via Improving Immune Response, Intestinal Morphology and Barrier Function of Nursery Pigs in Antibiotic Free Diets
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Early Weaning Affects Liver Antioxidant Function in Piglets

School of Animal and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(9), 2679; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092679
Submission received: 3 August 2021 / Revised: 9 September 2021 / Accepted: 10 September 2021 / Published: 13 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection The Weaned Pig: Nutrition and Management)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Early weaning is used to improve efficiency in pig production. However, early weaning may trigger liver oxidative stress in piglets. In this study, we evaluated the effects of early weaning on the development and antioxidant function of the liver in piglets. Our findings show that early weaning significantly decreases piglet body weight and suppresses liver development. We find that early weaning also suppresses the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) (p < 0.05). It could be concluded that weaning may reduce the growth performance and liver antioxidant function of piglets.

Abstract

This study examined the impact of early weaning on antioxidant function in piglets. A total of 40 Duroc × Landrace × Large White, 21-day-old piglets (half male and half female) were divided into suckling groups (SG) and weaning groups (WG). Piglets in WG were weaned at the 21st day, while the piglets in SG continued to get breastfed. Eight piglets from each group were randomly selected and slaughtered at 24th-day (SG3, WG3) and 28th-day old (SG7, WG7). The body weight, liver index, hepatocyte morphology, antioxidant enzymes activity, gene expression of antioxidant enzymes, and Nrf2 signaling in the liver of piglets were measured. The results showed that weaning caused decreased body weight (p < 0.01), lower liver weight (p < 0.01), and decreased the liver organ index (p < 0.05) of piglets. The area and size of hepatocytes in the WG group was smaller than that in the SG group (p < 0.05). We also observed that weaning reduced the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) (p < 0.05) in the liver of piglets. Relative to the SG3 group, the gene expression of GSH-Px in liver of WG3 was significantly reduced (p < 0.05). The gene expression of Nrf2 in the SG3 group was higher than that in the WG3 group (p < 0.01). The gene expression of NQO1 in the SG7 group was higher than that in the WG7 group (p < 0.05). In conclusion, weaning resulted in lower weight, slowed liver development, and reduced antioxidant enzymes activity, thereby impairing liver antioxidant function and suppressing piglet growth.

1. Introduction

Weaning is one of the most important periods of piglet growth and may cause weaning stress. Early weaning causes physiological stress to piglets, leading to abnormal physiological and immune functions, as well as more severe oxidative stress [1,2]. The liver is the main site of piglet metabolism and contains a large number of mitochondria, where reactive oxygen species are produced [3,4]. A previous study has reported that weaning may cause liver oxidative stress in piglets, affecting liver cell apoptosis via MAPK signaling [5]. Antioxidant enzymes are important modulators of liver metabolism, and liver metabolic disorders are the main pathological factors leading to liver disease [6].
Oxidative stress is caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS), which may damage proteins, nucleic acids, and cell membranes, and affect immune responses and barrier functions in weaned piglets [7,8]. Oxidative stress affects the development and physiological functions of tissues and organs in piglets [8]. It has been reported that early weaning could reduce the activity of digestive enzymes, impair tight junctions, and damage intestinal barrier function of weaned piglets [9,10]. Weaning also disrupts the redox balance, triggering oxidative stress and apoptosis [11,12]. Some other studies have also showed that the antioxidant enzymes activity is the main indicator of the liver function in weaned piglets [13,14]. The Nrf2 signaling pathway plays an important role in the process of oxidative stress and autophagy [15,16,17]. Under homeostatic conditions, Nrf2 binds to Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) in the cytoplasm. At the same time, Keap1 binds cullin 3 and forms an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, which can promote the occurrence of Nrf2 ubiquitination, thus causing the rapid degradation of Nrf2 [18]. In response to stress, Nrf2 will dissociate from Keap1 and then enter the nucleus and combine with the antioxidant response element (ARE), and then activate the expression of antioxidant-related genes such as NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1 (NQO1) and heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) [19]. In this study, we examined the effects of early weaning on the expression of antioxidant-related genes and antioxidant enzymes activity in weaned piglets, which are associated with Nrf2 signaling. This study was to study the effects of early weaning on the development and antioxidant function of the liver in piglets.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Approval

All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Yangzhou University (PR China).

2.2. Experimental Design

Twenty pairs of 21-day-old piglets ((Duroc × Landrace) × Large White) were chosen and randomly divided into SG and WG group. One pair includes two piglets with similar body weight from the same mother. The two piglets from the same mother were divided into two groups randomly, respectively. The sows were of similar parity (3rd or 4th) and fed with the same gestating diet that met nutrient requirements (formula were made according to the company standard). The piglets in WG group were weaned on the 21st-day old, while piglets in SG were breastfed by their own mothers until the end of the whole experiment. Eight piglets from SG and WG were randomly selected and slaughtered on the 24th-day old (SG3, WG3) and 28th-day old (SG7, WG7), respectively. The diets of the weaning piglets were designed according to the NRC (2012) (Table 1). During the experiment, the suckling group was allowed to breastfeed freely while the weaning group was given ad libitum access to the feed and water. Daily management, disinfection, and epidemic prevention were carried out according to the routine procedures of the pig farm.

2.3. Sample Collection

All piglets were fasted for 12 h before weighing and necropsy. The liver tissue samples were collected in 2 mL cryotubes and stored at −80 °C for later use. The formula for the calculation of organ index was: organ index (g/kg) = organ weight (g)/live weight (kg).

2.4. Histomorphometry Determination

Liver tissue was fixed in 4% polyoxymethylene for 48 h at 4 ℃. The tissues were then immersed in wax thrice, 40 minutes each, and embedded. They were then sectioned at 2 µm. The sections were then placed in a 37 °C water bath, dried, and stored for hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining. Two slices for each tissue sample were made, each slice was photographed under 10, 20, and 40× objective. A representative image of the stained part was taken on a microscope, and the size of liver cells quantified on Image-Pro Plus (6.0) (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA). The software evaluated cell area and particle sizes of 30 cells per field of view, and finally calculated their average.

2.5. Determination of Activity of Antioxidant Enzymes

The study was carried out 3 and 7 days after weaning (24 and 28 days old). All piglet liver samples were collected in 2 mL cryotubes and stored at −80 °C. Liver samples (0.9–2.1 g) were homogenized in 9 volumes of normal saline on an ice water bath. They were then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min, supernatant transferred into a new centrifuge tube, and stored at 4 °C. Total oxidizing capacity (T-AOC), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and malondialdehyde (MDA) were measured using kits that were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China).

2.6. RT-qPCR Analysis

Liver samples were taken from −80 °C and total RNA extracted using TRNZOL. RNA purity (Tiangen Biotechnology, Beijing, China) was then measured using Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and RNA quality examined by agarose gel electrophoresis. RNA was then reverse transcribed into cDNA and stored it at −80 °C for later use. Extraction of total RNA and its reverse transcription were performed according to the instructions of the TAKARA kit (TAKARA RR047A, Dalian, China). Primers were designed with Primer 5.0 according to the gene sequence of the pig (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ accessed on 20 December 2019). Primer sequences are shown in Table 2. The primers were synthesized by Yingwei Jieji (Shanghai, China) Trading Co., Ltd. The data was calculated using the method of 2−ΔΔCT according to the reference [20].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The statistical package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 23.0 was used for statistical analysis. The body weight and liver weight of piglets were analyzed by independent t test. The other data was first analyzed by double factor variance analysis with group (G) and time (T) as fixed effects. The interaction effect of G × T was also considered. Independent t test was further used to analyze the difference between SG and WG on the different time point. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Weaning on Piglet Liver Index

The results showed that the body weight, liver weight, and liver index of the WG piglets was significantly lower than that in the SG piglets (p < 0.05), and the liver index decreased especially on the 7th day after weaning (p < 0.01) (Table 3).

3.2. Effects of Weaning on Piglet Liver Morphology

The results showed that the particle size and area of hepatocytes in the piglets of WG group was smaller than that of the SG group (p < 0.05), and the area of hepatocytes decreased, especially on the 3rd day after weaning (p < 0.05) (Table 4).

3.3. Effect of Weaning on Antioxidant Enzymes Activity in Piglet Liver

The results show that the activity of SOD and CAT in the liver of WG was lower than that of SG (p < 0.05), and the activity of CAT decreased especially on the 7th day after weaning (p < 0.05) (Table 5).

3.4. Effect of Weaning on the Expression of Antioxidant Enzymes Genes in Piglet Liver

The results illustrate that there were no significant differences in gene expression of PRDX, SOD, and CAT between SG and WG groups (p > 0.05) (Table 6). However, the gene expression of GSH-Px in WG3 was significantly lower than that in SG3 (p < 0.05).

3.5. Effect of Weaning on the Expression of Nrf2 Related Genes in the Liver of Piglets

Effects of weaning on gene expression of Nrf2 pathways in the liver of piglet are shown in Table 7. The gene expression of Nrf2 in livers of WG3 was significantly lower than that in SG3 (p < 0.01). Compared with SG7, the expression of NQO1 in livers of WG7 was lower (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

Weaning is an important stage in pig production. Weaning stress alters physiological and immune function of piglets, which affects piglet immune responses and intestinal barrier function [21,22]. Oxidative stress can damage mitochondrial function and increase the release of mitochondrial (ROS) [23]. The increase of ROS will increase the pro-inflammatory factors, and damage the immune system of piglets [24,25]. Previous studies have shown that weaning upsets redox balance and triggers oxidative stress in piglets [23,25]. The liver is a crucial digestive organ in piglets and contains a large number of mitochondria, which are susceptible to oxidative stress [26]. The effects of weaning on the antioxidant ability of liver are rarely searched at present. Here, we evaluated how weaning affects the growth and the antioxidant ability of liver in piglets.
The liver is an important metabolic organ that oxidizes triglycerides to produce energy and plays an important role in lipid metabolism and immune regulation [27,28]. Liver development closely correlates with the growth of pigs [29]. Pigs weaned at 28-days old exhibit better growth performance than that of pigs weaned at 21-days old [30]. The earlier weaning time will slow down the growth of piglets, which is consistent with our findings. The results in this study suggested that weaning caused the loss of body weight and liver weight on the 3rd and 7th day after weaning. The results of hematoxylin-eosin staining showed that the area and particle size of hepatocytes in WG groups was smaller than that in SG groups, indicating that weaning stress significantly affects growth of weaned piglets, slowing liver development.
Oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species ROS induce cell and tissue damage through apoptosis [31,32,33]. The liver is the main site of ROS generation. Oxidative stress influences inflammation, metabolism, proliferative liver disease, and chronic liver disease [34,35]. Enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant systems are essential for cellular responses and regulate oxidative stress under physiological conditions [14,36]. Antioxidant enzymes like catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase are indicators of oxidative stress [37]. Yin et al. found that early weaning inhibited the activity of plasma SOD and CAT of piglets [38], which is consistent with our findings that the activity of SOD and CAT in liver of WG piglets is significantly lower than that of SG piglets, suggesting that weaning affects antioxidant enzymes activity in piglets.
The decrease in the expression of antioxidant mRNA in piglets is an important reason for the decreased antioxidant capacity of piglets [39]. Feng et al has reported that low-birth-weight caused decreased mRNA expression of GSH and SOD, thus caused decreased antioxidant capacity in the liver of piglets [40]. In this study, weaning down-regulated gene expression of GSH in the liver of piglets on the 3rd day after weaning. However, the enzyme activity of GSH did not change significantly after weaning, the reason for which might be that the modification and activation of antioxidant proteins are affected when piglets are under weaning stress [41,42].
Nrf2 signaling is a research hotspot in oxidative stress [43,44] and is the main regulator of cellular redox levels. Nrf2 is reported to be involved in transcriptional activation of ARE response genes, including glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase (γ-GCS), heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), antioxidants, proteasomes, and drug transporters [45,46]. Nrf2 and Keap1 form a conjugate, and then Nrf2 dissociates from the conjugate and stably translocates into the nucleus, driving expression of antioxidant enzymes genes [47,48]. In the oxidative stress model induced by diquat, Nrf2 signaling is essential for regulating the redox state of cells [49,50]. The results in this study showed that weaning caused the down-regulated expression of Nrf2 and NQO1 in the liver of piglets on the 3rd and 7th day after weaning, respectively.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, early weaning reduced piglet growth, liver index, and liver antioxidant enzymes activity. Our findings indicate that weaning reduces the antioxidant capacity of liver in piglets.

Author Contributions

H.L., L.Y., and L.D. designed the research; H.L., L.Y., L.D., Z.P., J.L., Y.G., T.W. and, H.W. conducted the research; H.L., and Y.G., analyzed the data; H.L., wrote the paper; L.Y, L.D., and H.W., edited the paper, and L.D. had primary responsibility for the final manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the earmarked fund for Jiangsu Agricultural Industry Technology System; the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (grant numbers BK20170490) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Yangzhou University of Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol code: NSFD 2016-DKXY-27, 8th of March, 2016).

Data Availability Statement

The data sets analyzed in the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank all employees of the Susheng Ecological Agriculture Development Co., Ltd. (Yangzhou, China) for helpful technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors had no conflicts of interest in the research.

References

  1. Novais, A.K.; Deschêne, K.; Martel-Kennes, Y.; Roy, C.; Laforest, J.P.; Lessard, M.; Matte, J.J.; Lapointe, J. Weaning differentially affects mitochondrial function, oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptosis in normal and low birth weight piglets. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hu, C.H.; Xiao, K.; Luan, Z.S.; Song, J. Early weaning increases intestinal permeability, alters expression of cytokine and tight junction proteins, and activates mitogen-activated protein kinases in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 1094–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Parola, M.; Robino, G. Oxidative stress-related molecules and liver fibrosis. J. Hepatol. 2001, 35, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cichoż-Lach, H.; Michalak, A. Oxidative stress as a crucial factor in liver diseases. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 8082–8091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Luo, Z.; Zhu, W.; Guo, Q.; Luo, W.; Zhang, J.; Xu, W.; Xu, J. Weaning induced hepatic oxidative stress, apoptosis, and ami-notransferases through MAPK signaling pathways in piglets. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 4768541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alía, M.; Horcajo, C.; Bravo, L.; Goya, L. Effect of grape antioxidant dietary fiber on the total antioxidant capacity and the activity of liver antioxidant enzymes in rats. Nutr. Res. 2003, 23, 1251–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Yuan, S.B.; Chen, D.W.; Zhang, K.Y.; Yu, B. Effects of oxidative stress on growth performance, nutrient digestibilities and ac-tivities of antioxidative enzymes of weanling pigs. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 20, 1600–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Storz, G.; Imlay, J.A. Mitochondria and apoptosis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 1999, 2, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zheng, P.; Yu, B.; He, J.; Yu, J.; Mao, X.; Luo, Y.; Luo, J.; Huang, Z.; Tian, G.; Zeng, Q.; et al. Arginine metabolism and its protective effects on intestinal health and functions in weaned piglets under oxidative stress induced by diquat. Br. J. Nutr. 2017, 117, 1495–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Cao, S.; Wu, H.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Q.; Jiao, L.; Lin, F.; Hu, C.H. Diquat-induced oxidative stress increases intestinal permeability, impairs mitochondrial function, and triggers mitophagy in piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 1795–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Song, Z.H.; Tong, G.; Xiao, K.; Jiao, L.F.; Ke, Y.L.; Hu, C.H. L-cysteine protects intestinal integrity, attenuates intestinal inflammation and oxidant stress, and modulates NF-kappaB and Nrf2 pathways in weaned piglets after LPS challenge. Innate Immun. 2016, 22, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Y.; Zhao, X.; Jiang, X.; Chen, L.; Hong, L.; Zhuo, Y.; Lin, Y.; Fang, Z.; Che, L.; Feng, B.; et al. Effects of dietary supplementation with exogenous catalase on growth performance, oxidative stress, and hepatic apoptosis in weaned piglets challenged with lipo-polysaccharide. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, S.; Tan, H.Y.; Wang, N.; Zhang, Z.J.; Lao, L.; Wong, C.W.; Feng, Y. The role of oxidative stress and antioxidants in liver diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 26087–26124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Meng, Q.; Guo, T.; Li, G.; Sun, S.; He, S.; Cheng, B.; Shi, B.; Shan, A. Dietary resveratrol improves antioxidant status of sows and piglets and regulates antioxidant gene expression in placenta by Keap1-Nrf2 pathway and Sirt1. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 9, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Xiao, D.; Yuan, D.; Tan, B.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Tan, B. The role of Nrf2 signaling pathway in Eucommia ulmoides flavones regulating oxidative stress in the intestine of piglets. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 9719618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Yin, J.; Duan, J.; Cui, Z.; Ren, W.; Li, T.; Yin, Y. Hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress activates NF-κB and Nrf2/Keap1 signals and triggers autophagy in piglets. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 15479–15486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lecce, J.G.; Armstrong, W.D.; Crawford, P.C.; Ducharme, G.A. Nutrition and management of early weaned piglets: Liquid vs dry feeding. J. Anim. Sci. 1979, 48, 1007–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Itoh, K.; Ishii, T.; Wakabayashi, N.; Yamamoto, M. Regulatory mechanisms of cellular response to oxidative stress. Free. Radic. Res. 1999, 31, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bellezza, I.; Giambanco, I.; Minelli, A.; Donato, R. Nrf2-Keap1 signaling in oxidative and reductive stress. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2018, 1865, 721–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Livak, K.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Moeser, A.J.; Ryan, K.A.; Nighot, P.K.; Blikslager, A.T. Gastrointestinal dysfunction induced by early weaning is attenuated by delayed weaning and mast cell blockade in pigs. Am. J. Physiol. -Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2007, 293, G413–G421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Smith, F.; Clark, J.E.; Overman, B.L.; Tozel, C.C.; Huang, J.H.; Rivier, J.E.; Blisklager, A.T.; Moeser, A.J. Early weaning stress impairs de-velopment of mucosal barrier function in the porcine intestine. Am. J. Physiol. -Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2010, 298, G352–G363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Mao, X.; Lv, M.; Yu, B.; He, J.; Zheng, P.; Yu, J.; Wang, Q.; Chen, D. The effect of dietary tryptophan levels on oxidative stress of liver induced by diquat in weaned piglets. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2014, 5, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Shimada, K.; Crother, T.R.; Karlin, J.; Dagvadorj, J.; Chiba, N.; Chen, S.; Ramanujan, V.K.; Wolf, A.J.; Vergnes, L.; Ojcius, D.M.; et al. Oxidized mitochondrial DNA activates the NLRP3 inflammasome during apoptosis. Immunity 2012, 36, 401–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Zhou, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.; Wan, D.; Yin, Y. Effects of Dietary Serine Supplementation on Intestinal Integrity, Inflammation and Oxidative Status in Early-Weaned Piglets. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 48, 993–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nguyen, P.; Leray, V.; Diez, M.; Serisier, S.; Bloc’h, J.L.; Siliart, B.; Dumon, H. Liver lipid metabolism. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2008, 92, 272–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Limdi, J.K.; Hyde, G.M. Evaluation of abnormal liver function tests. Postgrad. Med J. 2003, 79, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lu, T.; Harper, A.F.; Zhao, J.; Estienne, M.J.; Dalloul, R.A. Supplementing antioxidants to pigs fed diets high in oxidants: I. Effects on growth performance, liver function, and oxidative status. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 92, 5455–5463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Çelik, S.; Özkaya, A. Effects of intraperitoneally administered lipoic acid, vitamin E, and linalool on the level of total lipid and fatty acids in guinea pig brain with oxidative stress induced by H2O2. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2002, 35, 547–552. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ming, D.; Wang, W.; Huang, C.; Wang, Z.; Shi, C.; Ding, J.; Liu, H.; Wang, F. Effects of weaning age at 21 and 28 days on growth performance, intestinal morphology and redox status in piglets. Animals 2021, 11, 2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mittler, R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant. Sci. 2002, 7, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rhoads, D.M.; Umbach, A.L.; Subbaiah, C.C.; Siedow, J.N. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. contribution to oxidative stress and interorganellar signaling. Plant. Physiol. 2006, 141, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Poli, G. Pathogenesis of liver fibrosis: Role of oxidative stress. Mol. Asp. Med. 2000, 21, 49–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cederbaum, A.I.; Lu, Y.; Wu, D. Role of oxidative stress in alcohol-induced liver injury. Arch. Toxicol. 2009, 83, 519–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Birben, E.; Sahiner, U.M.; Sackesen, C.; Erzurum, S.; Kalayci, O. Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense. World Allergy Organ. J. 2012, 5, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Luo, W.L.; Luo, Z.; Xu, X.; Zhao, S.; Li, S.H.; Sho, T.; Yao, J.; Zhang, J.; Xu, W.N.; Xu, J.X. The Effect of maternal diet with fish oil on ox-idative stress and inflammatory response in sow and new-born piglets. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 6765803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Matés, J.M.; Pérez-Gómez, C.; De Castro, I.N. Antioxidant enzymes and human diseases. Clin. Biochem. 1999, 32, 595–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yin, J.; Wu, M.M.; Xiao, H.; Ren, W.K.; Duan, J.L.; Yang, G.; Li, T.J.; Yin, Y.L. Development of an antioxidant system after early weaning in piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 92, 612–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Xu, C.L.; Wang, Y.Z.; Guo, J.; Liu, J.X.; Feng, J. Comparison of age-related differences in expression of antioxidant enzyme mRNA and activity in various tissues of pigs. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007, 147, 445–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Feng, C.; Bai, K.; Wang, A.; Ge, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, T. Effects of dimethylglycine sodium salt supplementation on growth performance, hepatic antioxidant capacity, and mitochondria-related gene expression in weanling piglets born with low birth weight1. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 3791–3803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Theys, N.; Clippe, A.; Bouckenooghe, T.; Reusens, B.; Remacle, C. Early low protein diet aggravates unbalance between antiox-idant enzymes leading to islet dysfunction. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Girard, P.M.; Peynot, N.; Lelièvre, J.M. Differential correlations between changes to glutathione redox state, protein ubiquitination, and stress-inducible HSPA chaperone expression after different types of oxidative stress. Cell Stress Chaperones 2018, 23, 985–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ma, Q. Role of Nrf2 in oxidative stress and toxicity. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2013, 53, 401–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Dhakshinamoorthy, S.; Long, D.J.; Jaiswal, A.K. Antioxidant regulation of genes encoding enzymes that detoxify xenobiotics and carcinogens. Curr. Top. Cell. Regul. 2001, 36, 201–216. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang, D.D. Mechanistic Studies of the Nrf2-Keap1 Signaling Pathway. Drug Metab. Rev. 2006, 38, 769–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kobayashi, M.; Yamamoto, M. Nrf2–Keap1 regulation of cellular defense mechanisms against electrophiles and reactive oxygen species. Adv. Enzyme Regul. 2006, 46, 113–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kaspar, J.W.; Niture, S.K.; Jaiswal, A.K. Nrf2: INrf2 (Keap1) signaling in oxidative stress. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2009, 47, 1304–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Hayashi, A.; Suzuki, H.; Itoh, K.; Yamamoto, M.; Sugiyama, Y. Transcription factor Nrf2 is required for the constitutive and inducible expression of multidrug resistance-associated protein1 in mouse embryo fibroblasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 310, 824–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Osburn, W.O.; Wakabayashi, N.; Misra, V.; Nilles, T.; Biswal, S.; Trush, M.A.; Kensler, T.W. Nrf2 regulates an adaptive response pro-tecting against oxidative damage following diquat-mediated formation of superoxide anion. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2006, 454, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Xun, W.; Fu, Q.; Shi, L.; Cao, T.; Jiang, H.; Ma, Z. Resveratrol protects intestinal integrity, alleviates intestinal inflammation and oxidative stress by modulating AhR/Nrf2 pathways in weaned piglets challenged with diquat. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 99, 107989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Composition and nutrient levels of basal diets (air-dry basis).
Table 1. Composition and nutrient levels of basal diets (air-dry basis).
IngredientContent (%)Nutrition LevelsContent (%)
Corn60.50DE (MJ/kg)14.11
Fish meal5.00CP20.21
Corn gluten meal5.00Ca0.76
Soybean oil1.00AP0.45
Soybean meal24.00Lys1.25
Limestone1.18Met0.43
CaHPO41.30Thr0.71
L-Lys0.60Trp0.16
Met0.13
Thr0.17
Ser0.02
Choline chloride0.10
NaCl0.40
Premix 10.60
Total100.00
1 The premix is provided for each kg of diet: VA 6000 IU, VD3 400 IU, VE 30 mg, VK3 2 mg, VB1 3.5 mg, VB2 5.5 mg, VB6 3.5 mg, VB12 25.0 μg, biotin 0.05 mg, Folic acid 0.3 mg, D-pantothenic acid 20 mg, niacin 20 mg, chloride 500 mg, iron Fe (as ferrous sulfate) 110 mg, zinc Zn (as zinc sulfate) 100 mg, Copper Cu (as copper sulfate) 20 mg, manganese Mn (as manganese sulfate) 40 mg, selenium Se (as sodium selenite) 0.30 mg, iodine I (as potassium iodide) 0.40 mg. DE Digestible energy and AP available phosphorus were calculated in reference to Nutrition parameters and Feeding Standard for Animals, while the other nutrient levels were measured values.
Table 2. Information of Quantitative Real-time PCR.
Table 2. Information of Quantitative Real-time PCR.
Gene.Accession NoPrimer Sequence (5′-3′)Amplicon Size/bp
β-ActinDQ845171.1AGGCCAACCGTGAGAAGATG
CATGACAATGCCAGTGGTGC
122
CATNM_214301GCTGAGTCCGAAGTCGTCTA
CATGGTGTCCGACTAGCCTT
93
SODNM_214127TGTAACTGAGCGATACGCCG
GGTATTCGGCGCTCCTACAA
99
Nrf2NM_001185152.1TCCAAGTGAGCCATCGTTCG
TGGCAGCTCATAAGGTGGTG
133
PRDX3NM_001244531.1CGAGACTACGGTGTGCTGTT
GAGGGTCTCTTCCACGCTTC
132
HO-1NM_001004027.1GCCATGTGAATGCAACCCTG
GCCAGTCAAGAGACCATCCC
88
Keap1XM_021076667.1GTGTGGAGAGGAGTCTGTGT
TCCACGTTTCTGTCTCCACG
112
NQO1NM_001159613.1GATCATACTGGCCCACTCCG
CATGGCATACAGGTCCGACA
115
Table 3. Effects of weaning on the development of liver in piglets.
Table 3. Effects of weaning on the development of liver in piglets.
ItemsTimeGroupsMeanSEMp-Value
SWGTG × T
Body weight (kg)3 d5.86 **5.085.470.18<0.01<0.010.14
7 d7.34 **5.776.56
Mean6.605.436.02
Liver weight (g)3 d155.43 *115.02135.235.30<0.010.010.11
7 d195.63 **129.95162.79
Mean175.53122.49149.01
Liver index (g/kg)3 d26.4722.7924.630.18<0.01<0.010.14
7 d27.12 *22.5224.82
Mean26.8022.6624.73
Values are expressed as means and SEM, n = 8; S, suckling group; W, weaning group; G, group; T, time. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 (* Indicates significant differences between different treatments at the same weaning time).
Table 4. Effects of weaning on the size and area of liver cells of piglets.
Table 4. Effects of weaning on the size and area of liver cells of piglets.
ItemsTimeGroupsMeanSEMp-Value
SWGTG × T
Particle size
(μm)
3 d6.51 *4.265.390.930.040.080.88
7 d8.02 *6.067.04
Mean7.275.166.22
area (μm2)3 d87.85 *80.684.231.730.010.060.72
7 d91.0286.0688.54
Mean89.4483.3386.39
Values are expressed as means and SEM, n = 8; S, suckling group; W, weaning group; G, group; T, time. * p < 0.05 (* Indicates significant differences between different treatments at the same weaning time).
Table 5. Effects of weaning on antioxidant function of liver of piglets.
Table 5. Effects of weaning on antioxidant function of liver of piglets.
ItemsTimeGroupsMeanSEMp-Value
SWGTG × T
T-AOC (U/mg prot)3 d3.523.293.410.090.130.840.73
7 d3.623.273.45
Mean3.573.283.43
SOD (U/mg prot)3 d5.80 *5.635.720.02<0.010.730.76
7 d5.80 *5.605.70
Mean5.805.625.71
CAT (U/mg prot)3 d12.9211.6412.280.330.020.650.50
7 d13.06 *10.8911.98
Mean12.9911.2712.13
GSH-Px (U/mg prot)3 d209.46188.83199.159.260.100.120.55
7 d191.09147.68169.39
Mean200.28168.26184.27
MDA (nmol/mg prot)3 d1.832.292.060.130.110.310.87
7 d1.611.991.80
Mean1.722.141.93
Values are expressed as means and SEM, n = 8; S, suckling group; W, weaning group; G, group; T, time. * p < 0.05 (* Indicates significant differences between different treatments at the same weaning time).
Table 6. Effects of weaning on the gene expression of antioxidant enzymes in the liver of piglets.
Table 6. Effects of weaning on the gene expression of antioxidant enzymes in the liver of piglets.
ItemsTimeGroupsMean SEMp-Value
SWGTG × T
PRDX3 d1.001.021.010.090.710.040.95
7 d1.461.411.44
Mean1.231.221.22
SOD3 d1.000.830.920.390.460.040.60
7 d3.102.081.70
Mean2.051.462.59
CAT3 d1.000.890.950.240.780.120.92
7 d1.791.701.75
Mean1.401.301.35
GSH-Px3 d1.00 *0.440.720.220.57<0.010.42
7 d2.432.542.49
Mean1.721.491.61
Values are expressed as means and SEM, n = 8; S, suckling group; W, weaning group; G, group; T, time. *p < 0.05 (* Indicates significant differences between different treatments at the same weaning time).
Table 7. Effects of weaning on gene expression of Nrf2 pathways in the liver of piglet.
Table 7. Effects of weaning on gene expression of Nrf2 pathways in the liver of piglet.
ItemsTimeGroupsMean SEMp-Value
SWGTG × T
Nrf23 d1.00 **0.310.660.660.710.070.87
7 d3.313.043.18
Mean2.161.681.92
HO-13 d1.001.081.040.540.930.190.27
7 d1.170.861.02
Mean1.090.971.03
NQO13 d1.000.870.940.520.650.070.06
7 d2.40 *0.161.28
Mean1.700.521.11
Keap13 d1.001.211.110.510.050.190.78
7 d1.361.691.53
Mean1.181.451.32
Values are expressed as means and SEM, n = 8; S, suckling group; W, weaning group; G, group; T, time. *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01 (* Indicates significant differences between different treatments at the same weaning time).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, L.; Li, H.; Peng, Z.; Ge, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, T.; Wang, H.; Dong, L. Early Weaning Affects Liver Antioxidant Function in Piglets. Animals 2021, 11, 2679. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092679

AMA Style

Yu L, Li H, Peng Z, Ge Y, Liu J, Wang T, Wang H, Dong L. Early Weaning Affects Liver Antioxidant Function in Piglets. Animals. 2021; 11(9):2679. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092679

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Lihuai, Hongmin Li, Zhong Peng, Yuzhu Ge, Jun Liu, Tianlong Wang, Hongrong Wang, and Li Dong. 2021. "Early Weaning Affects Liver Antioxidant Function in Piglets" Animals 11, no. 9: 2679. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092679

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop