Next Article in Journal
Dietary Starch Concentration Affects Dairy Sheep and Goat Performances Differently during Mid-Lactation
Next Article in Special Issue
Modulation of Cathepsin S (CTSS) Regulates the Secretion of Progesterone and Estradiol, Proliferation, and Apoptosis of Ovarian Granulosa Cells in Rabbits
Previous Article in Journal
A Prototype Skin Substitute, Made of Recycled Marine Collagen, Improves the Skin Regeneration of Sheep
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antibacterial Activity of Some Molecules Added to Rabbit Semen Extender as Alternative to Antibiotics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Strategies for Highly Efficient Rabbit Sperm Cryopreservation

1
Center for Animal Resources and Collaborative Study, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, 38 Nishigonaka, Myodaiji, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan
2
National Institute for Physiological Sciences, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, 38 Nishigonaka, Myodaiji, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan
3
Department of Physiological Sciences, SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), Aichi, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan
4
Analytical Research Center for Experimental Sciences, Division of Biological Resources and Development, Saga University, 5-1-1 Nabeshima, Saga 849-8501, Japan
5
Department of Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medical Sciences, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo 409-3898, Japan
6
Animal Resources Section, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, 1919-1 Tancha, Onna-son, Kunigami-gun, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan
7
School of Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Wuyi University, Jiangmen 529020, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(5), 1220; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051220
Submission received: 15 March 2021 / Revised: 20 April 2021 / Accepted: 21 April 2021 / Published: 23 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges and New Strategies on Rabbit Breeding)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The rabbit is a valuable animal for both the economy and biomedical sciences. Therefore, the preservation of many rabbit strains is vitally important. So far, sperm cryopreservation is one of the most efficient ways to preserve rabbit strains because it is easy to collect ejaculate repeatedly from a single male and perform artificial insemination to multiple females. Although this method is widely used, there are still some concerns regarding the cooling, freezing and thawing process of sperms, which markedly affects the quality of preserved sperms. In this article, we will review the progress made during the past years in terms of cryopreservation of rabbit sperms and discuss those factors that would possibly influence sperm damage including freezing extender, cryoprotectant, supplements, and procedures.

Abstract

The rabbit is a valuable animal for both the economy and biomedical sciences. Sperm cryopreservation is one of the most efficient ways to preserve rabbit strains because it is easy to collect ejaculate repeatedly from a single male and inseminate artificially into multiple females. During the cooling, freezing and thawing process of sperms, the plasma membrane, cytoplasm and genome structures could be damaged by osmotic stress, cold shock, intracellular ice crystal formation, and excessive production of reactive oxygen species. In this review, we will discuss the progress made during the past years regarding efforts to minimize the cell damage in rabbit sperms, including freezing extender, cryoprotectants, supplements, and procedures.

1. Introduction

Rabbits have been indispensable for human life because they are not only valuable for agriculture but also for biomedical research. Rabbits are widely used as a source of meat, hair and fur, and it is estimated that each year, around 300 million rabbits (and hares) are used in the world [1]. Because of their tame characters, rabbits are also raised as a pet. In addition, rabbits are the most-used animals for antibody production for biomedical research. Furthermore, rabbits are similar to humans in terms of cardiovascular physiology and lipid metabolism, and they play an important role in studying human diseases such as atherosclerosis and hypercholesterolemia [2,3]. Along with the development of genetic engineering, a number of gene-modified rabbits have been established as experimental models of human diseases. In addition to transgenic rabbits produced with the conventional pronuclear microinjection technique, knockout rabbits have been established using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology [4]. These established genetically modified rabbits are rare and valuable and thus it is vitally important to breed and maintain rabbit strains for different purposes and preserve them as bio-resources [5].
There are two major ways to preserve rabbit strains. The common way to maintain a rabbit colony is carried out simply by repeat breeding. However, several difficulties with this method exist including space and cost. In particular, rabbit shows severe inbreeding depression [6,7,8,9], thus a considerable number of rabbits are required to keep a colony. For laboratory rabbits, they are usually housed in strictly controlled conditions in terms of temperature, humidity, illumination and microbiological examinations. Furthermore, living animals have a risk of annihilation or escape in the case of a disaster or accident.
The second method of maintaining the rabbit colony is the cryopreservation of gametes. Cryopreservation of gametes requires less space and cost than animal breeding. It is generally believed that properly cryopreserved zygotes and gametes can be preserved semi-eternally in a liquid nitrogen tank to keep their fertile and developmental ability. In the case of employing ovum or embryo preservation, ova or embryos are generally obtained with oviduct–uterus dissection from sacrificed females, and a skillful surgical operation is required for the embryo transfer. In contrast, ejected semen can be collected repeatedly without sacrificing males (Figure 1) and artificially inseminated into females can be conducted without specific skills, and thus, sperm cryopreservation would be the first choice for preservation of rabbit strains even though sperms preserved can bring paternal hereditary information only, and immediate offspring is always heterozygosity. However, when concerned with one specific transgene, homozygotes can be obtained in the second generation. Even in the case of livestock animals concerning pedigree related with polygenetic factors, the inbreeding can be avoided by mating live females and cryopreserved sperm with a generation gap.
As mentioned above, the successful preservation of rabbits depends on the efficiency and reliability of procedures in sperm cryopreservation. It is known that the process of sperm cryopreservation, including cooling, freezing and thawing, leads to cellular damage on membrane, cytoplasm and genome structures [10,11] caused by osmotic stress, cold shock, intracellular ice crystal formation, and excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [12] (Figure 2). During the cooling process, the sperm membrane is injured by cold shock which can be diminished by cooling rate [13] or materials stabilizing the membrane including egg yolk or skim milk [14]. The addition of cryoprotectants causes osmotic and toxic stress, which increases due to prolonged exposure during slow cooling [15]. In following freezing process, major problem is ice crystal formation which grow larger by recrystallization and injures cell [16]. The freezing rate and cryoprotectants application should be considered to diminish the problem. Recrystallization occurs during the thawing process because of entry through the recrystallization temperature zone. Since sperms suffer oxidative stress throughout the cryopreservation process [12], supplementation of antioxidants is considerable for the improvement of sperm quality.
Enormous efforts have been exerted to minimize these detrimental effects, and increase the efficiency and reliability of sperm cryopreservation in the rabbit. In this review, we will discuss recent findings and perspectives including extenders, cryoprotectants, supplements and procedures.

2. Effects of Extender and Cryoprotectants

The sperm freezing extenders are commonly composed of a buffer (commonly Tris buffer for rabbit sperms), salt(s) and cryoprotectant(s) to avoid cell damage caused by inadequate pH, osmolality and cryogenic injury [13]. As a component in the freezing extender, egg yolk provides optimal results in rabbit sperm cryopreservation [17,18]. Nevertheless, the egg yolk contains both beneficial and detrimental components for sperms [19,20]. Additionally, there is a sanitary concern in using fresh biotic materials, like the egg yolk, which is subjected to quarantine inspection in the case of import/export. To avoid these risks, lecithin, also known as phosphatidylcholine, a component of egg yolk, is often used to prevent cold shock in sperm cryopreservation [21,22]. It is reported that non-animal originated soybean lecithin with minimal sanitary risks can be used as a substitute for egg yolk based on the motility and fertility of the frozen–thawed rabbit sperm [23]. Skim milk, another substitute, contains advantageous components in the freezing extender in various animal species [24,25,26,27,28,29,30] including rabbits [31]. However, using skim milk in the sperm freezing extender is less common than egg yolk in the rabbit.
The major problem in sperm cryopreservation is the mechanical invasion of sperm cells by ice crystals generated during the freezing process, which decreases the viability of sperm after thawing [32]. Dehydration of cellular water and percolation and immersion of cryoprotectants into the cell are usually performed to avoid the generation of the ice crystals. Both permeable (such as glycerol, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethylene glycol, and amides) and non-permeable (saccharides, lipoprotein and Ficoll) are used as cryoprotectants. The permeant agent binds to intracellular free water leading to suppression of the generation of ice crystals. On the other hand, the non-permeant agents surrounding the cell increase extracellular osmotic pressure and enhance dehydration of the cell [33,34,35].
Lots of studies have been conducted regarding concentrations and combination effects of the cryoprotectants on rabbit sperm cryopreservation as encyclopedically reviewed by Mocé and Vicente [14]. Though glycerol and DMSO are the most common permeable cryoprotectant, it was suggested that glycerol is not suitable for rabbit sperm cryopreservation [14] possibly because of its low water permeability and high activation energy [36]. Additionally, it is known that high concentrations of DMSO show adverse effects on sperm quality in terms of motility and acrosome integrity [37,38]. Amides, namely lactamide and acetamide, are another candidate as a permeable cryoprotectant for rabbit sperm cryopreservation [39,40] and provide better results than glycerol or DMSO [41,42].
Lactose, sucrose, maltose, raffinose, treharose, and dextrans are used as non-permeable cryoprotectants in sperm cryopreservation, and have been shown to have an effect of stabilizing the plasma membrane during freeze–thaw process by interacting with membrane phospholipids [33,34,35] in addition to increasing the osmotic pressure.

3. Effects of Freezing and Thawing Procedure

Two principal techniques, slow freezing and vitrification, were employed for sperm freezing (Figure 1). During the freezing process of cells, extracellular water is frozen more quickly than intracellular water [42]. Generation of the ice corresponds to the decrement of water, which produces an imbalance of cellular osmotic pressure and intracellular water moving out of the cell. In slow freezing, generation of the intracellular ice crystal is suppressed since the cellular dehydration progresses slowly during a longer time of freezing. Concomitantly, concentrations of solute are deleterious to the cells and exposure time will be increased within a slow freezing procedure [42]. On the other hand, in vitrification, the cells are immediately cooled to −196 °C in liquid nitrogen and exposure time to high concentrated cryoprotectant is minimized. A countermeasure, including the application of high concentrated cryoprotectans, to suppress the ice crystal generation is required since dehydration is not always sufficient in vitrification.
Vitrification procedure has been explored in various mammalian sperm including humans [10,43]. It is known that sperms with larger heads are more susceptible to cold shock [44], which reduces sperm survivability [45]. The head of rabbit sperms is relatively large [32] and no efficient procedure in vitrification has been established. Rosato and Iaffaldano [46] compared the frozen–thawed sperm survival and fertility with/without various cryoprotectants between slow freezing and vitrification, and showed that the outcome from vitrification was far inferior to slow freezing. It is known that cells with a high water permeability show better tolerance for rapid freezing than those with a low water permeability [47], and rabbit sperm shows a low water permeability [36]. Therefore, conventional slow freezing is the prime choice for sperm cryopreservation at the current moment.
In the slow freezing procedure, sperms are cooled down to 5 °C before freezing to avoid the cold shock [45]. In the case of rabbits, Mocé et al. [48] reported that slow cooling to 5 °C improved neither fertility rate nor prolificacy in relation to cryopreservation. On the other hand, Maeda et al. [49] revealed that the viability of frozen–thawed rabbit sperm cooled at −0.1 or −0.2 °C/min (slower) were higher than at −0.8 °C/min. These data indicate that a faster cooling rate negatively affects sperm viability and does not improve reproductive performance after freezing and thawing. Obtaining more viable sperm results in efficiency improvement of cryopreservation, since the possibility of successful fertilization is increased. Additionally, in rabbits, time held at 5 °C affects the quality and reproductive performance of sperm. It was reported that longer holding time (90 min) at 5 °C increases the quality of frozen–thawed rabbit sperm and their fertilizing ability [50], and conversely, and shortened holding time (10 min) decreases it [51].
The ice crystal formation during the freezing process damage cells as described above and freezing protocol is also one of the concerns. In rabbit sperms, it was revealed that sperms frozen at slow (−15 °C/min) and fast (−60 °C/min) rates were lower in the quality and fertilizing ability than those frozen at medium (−40 °C/min) rate and in static liquid nitrogen vapor [52].
The thawing rate of frozen sperms is also known to affect the quality of sperms. Though frozen sperms are usually thawed at temperatures close to body temperature, it is generally recognized that high thawing rates provide better results [32,53]. It is possible that low thawing rates enhance recrystallization, a phenomenon that relatively many small ice crystals aggregate and form fewer larger ice crystals, which causes more severe damage to the cells [16]. Though thawing temperatures over 60 °C were adopted in some cases [54,55,56,57], exposing duration to a high temperature must be strictly controlled. Mocé et al. [58] compared the fertility rate and prolificacy of frozen rabbit sperm between thawed at 50 °C and 70 °C for 10–12 s, and concluded that thawing at 50 °C provided better results. In contrast, Chen and Foote [59] reported that the mortality of sperm thawed at 25 °C for 1 min was superior to those thawed at 45 °C for 30 s or 65 °C for 7 s following mechanical seeding at −6 °C. Therefore, appropriate thawing temperature can be affected by other conditions including cooling or freezing procedures, and further studies are demanded.

4. Cryopreservation Device

The choice of the freezing devices affects the quality of frozen–thawed sperm. Glass vials [31], plastic ampoules, polyvinylchloride tubing, [60] and pellet [61] addition to straws, which are widely employed in recent years, have been utilized for rabbit sperm cryopreservation. Thermal conductance to sperm depends on the shape, size and material of the device, which influences cooling, freezing and thawing rates. It was shown that rapid warming had a more dominant effect on survival than rapid cooling in mouse oocyte [62], and rapidly warming to the critical temperature range (−70 °C to −35 °C) at which intracellular ice is likely to form by recrystallization would improve cryopreservation efficiency of cell [63]. In the case of rabbit sperms, though the rapid freezing method (vitrification) has not been commonly utilized, the development of a new method and device for rapid thawing could lead to a great improvement of sperm cryopreservation efficiency.

5. Effects of Supplements

As mentioned above, lots of studies have been performed to address components of the sperm freezing extenders; however, results were not always satisfying. Some additional supplements can improve the efficiency in sperm cryopreservation (Table 1).
The antioxidant is one of the most expected supplements for sperm cryopreservation by eliminating the excessive production of ROS [12]. Zhu and colleague investigated the effects of supplementation of amin E analogue [64], cysteine [65], glutamine [66], trehalose [67] and melatonin [68], and revealed that supplementation of these antioxidative agents in Tris-citrate-glucose extender decreased ROS levels and improved the quality of frozen–thawed rabbit sperms. Fadl et al. confirmed 1.0 mM melatonin improved the motility, viability, membrane and acrosome integrities, and DNA integrity of frozen–thawed rabbit sperms in different extender (INRA-82) [69] Additionally, curcumin and curcumin nanoparticles were confirmed to improve the post-thawed quality of rabbit sperms via redox signaling and reduce the apoptosis process [70]. On the other hand, Maya-Soriano et al. reported that supplementation of bovine serum albumin, retinol and retinyl in the sperm freezing extender has no beneficial effect on the viability, mortality, progressivity, and acrosome and morphological integrity of frozen–thawed rabbit sperms at the concentrations they tested [71]. In this sense, other researchers have revealed the importance of the antioxidant concentration to achieve beneficial effects on rabbit sperm quality after thawing. Thus, while 4 mM of glutathione (GSH) improved [72] the viability, mortality, progressivity and acrosome integrity of frozen–thawed rabbit sperms, 0.5 mM of GSH did not provide similar results [73]. More studies are necessary for the adjustment of the freezing media in this species.
There are also some supplements with controversy surrounding their effects on rabbit sperm cryopreservation. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) is known to have a dual effect to protect sperm from osmotic stress by increasing membrane resistance [12] and oxidative stress by trapping free radicals [74]. Therefore, supplementation of BSA has been shown to improve the quality of frozen–thawed sperms in some species [75,76,77,78]. However, in rabbits, controversial results regarding the usage of BSA have been reported. Thus, while Maya-Soriano et al. [71] did not find any beneficial effect on sperm viability, mortality, progressivity, and acrosome and morphological integrity, Rosato and Iaffaldano [46] showed that frozen–thawed rabbit sperm display better mortality and DNA integrity when BSA is combined with sucrose or trehalose. These facts suggest that concentration and/or combination with other contents of the extender are important for exerting the beneficial effects of BSA. Moreover, gelatin is known to have protective effects including reduction of the sperm sedimentation and maintenance of the pH homogeneity in cooled semen [79] which has been confirmed in rabbits as well [80,81]. However, Cortell et al. [82] reported that gelatin addition did not improve the motility and viability nor fertility and prolificacy of frozen–thawed sperms in the rabbit. In later years, it was reported adding 2% gelatin enhanced the freezability and fertility of frozen–thawed rabbit sperms [83].
Antifreeze proteins (AFPs) are known to stabilize cell membranes and inhibit ice crystal growth and ice recrystallization [84,85]. With such functions, supplementation of AFP type III in the sperm freezing extender can improve the quality of frozen–thawed rabbit sperms [86]. However, AFPs are not easy to extract from natural resources such as fungi, bacteria, plants, insects and fish that are adapted to cold environments [87] and AFPs derived from other organisms can be detrimental to sperms or inseminated female animals. Tekin and Daşkın [88] utilized polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) instead of AFPs for ice recrystallization inhibition and showed that supplementation enhances motility, viability, acrosome integrity and mitochondrial activity in frozen–thawed rabbit sperms.
By stabilization of cell membrane, supplementation of a silk protein, sericin [89] and cholesterol-loaded cyclodextrin [90] improved motility and quality of frozen–thawed rabbit sperm. However, since these supplements are known to inhibit acrosome reaction [89,91], further studies on enhancing its fertility are required for practical use.

6. Another Preservation Strategy

The freeze-drying technique is an alternative technology for the long-term preservation of sperms [92]. Liu et al. [93] showed that freeze-dried rabbit sperms maintain the ability for full-term development in spite of immobilization, membrane breaking, and tail fragmentation. It is important to store freeze-dried sperms at low temperatures for stable, long-term preservation, and properly stored freeze-dried sperms maintain their fertility for years [92]. It is necessary to operate intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) [94] and embryo transfer, which require a skillful technique and particular device for using the freeze-dried sperms. One of the advantages of sperm preservation in rabbits is the applicability of artificial insemination as mentioned above, and preservation of freeze-dried sperms would be just a spare option in rabbit sperm preservation.

7. Conclusions and Perspectives

As stated above, numerous studies on improving rabbit sperm cryopreservation have been conducted from various aspects including freezing procedure, type, concentration and combination of cryoprotectants. In spite of this, a standard procedure for rabbit sperm cryopreservation has not been well established due to various and irreproducible results from each study.
One of the reasons for the irreproducibility in rabbit sperm cryopreservation may be derived from the differences in sperm conditions. It is known that freezabilities of rabbit sperms differ among individuals [95] or breeds [96]. However, rabbit breeds used in some reproductive studies have not strictly and well defined rather than other livestock animals such as cattle, horses or pigs, and some authors even did not provide enough information about the rabbit breed examined. There are several reports which indicate associations between the sperm freezability and abundance of particular components in seminal plasma including proteins and fatty acids in some species [97,98,99,100,101,102]. The individual and breed difference in sperm freezability can be explained by such seminal plasma traits. It would be possible to improve the sperm freezability and resolve the individual or breed differences by complemental supplementations according to the seminal plasma trait. In the rabbit, it was revealed that genotype, i.e., breed, affects the abundance of some seminal plasma proteins [103], which are associated with sperm quality [104]. Furthermore, there is no information about the association between sperm freezability and seminal plasma traits in rabbits, and further studies are needed. Again, lack of information about the rabbit breed can disturb the improvement of rabbit sperm cryopreservation efficiency.
Another possible reason for the irreproducibility is disunified evaluation criteria of the quality of the sperms among the reports. Some studies report both the quality of the frozen–thawed sperms and their fertility and prolificacy, and others do only one of them. Examination of fertility and prolificacy involves artificial insemination procedures which affect the results of the study. On the other hand, fertility and prolificacy cannot be estimated by the sperm quality alone, even though obtaining more motile sperms is generally advantageous for efficient reproduction [105,106,107]. Additionally, the rate of rapid and progressive motile sperm would be important for successful artificial insemination, since the inseminated sperm need to reach the ova via a long reproductive tract [108,109,110].
In any case, to achieve a consensus on the efficient method for rabbit sperm cryopreservation, extensive investigations are required under unified evaluation criteria and conditions except for factors like extenders, cryoprotectants and procedures to be examined. On the other hand, it seemed that the supplements like antioxidants generally just add their effects without interfering with other components in the extender. Therefore, most of the supplements exert expected effects on the quality of frozen–thawed rabbit sperm even in various conditions including the extender (Table 1). The dose and combination of the supplements can be a key subject for highly efficient rabbit sperm cryopreservation in future studies.
As Dr. Robert G. Edwards was awarded The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for the development of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 2010, assisted reproductive technology (ART) including IVF is an indispensable medical procedure in this modern age. The rabbit is also known as a prime reproductive model for human health, because of (1) exact staging of early embryonic developmental and maternal pregnancy stages, (2) large-sized blastocysts amenable to micromanipulation, (3) cell-lineage-specific analyses, (4) gastrulation stages representative of mammalian development, and (5) placental morphology and function similar to the human [111]. Therefore, the development of reproductive technology in rabbits, which leads to the improvement of medical procedures in humans, is very important and desirable.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, K.N.; review and editing, J.F. and M.N.; supervision, S.K., F.M. and C.-c.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI (JP17K08783 and JP15H04718), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81941001 and 81770457) and the JSPS-CAS Bilateral Joint Research Program (JPJSBP 120187204).

Acknowledgments

The authors express their sincere respect and thanks to the emeritus Teruo Watanabe, Saga University and Masatoshi Morimoto of Fukuoka Jo Gakuin Nursing University for their valuable advice in preparing the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO Database. 2019. Available online: http://www.faostat.fao.org (accessed on 14 March 2021).
  2. Fan, J.; Kitajima, S.; Watanabe, T.; Xu, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, E.; Chen, Y.E. Rabbit models for the study of human atherosclerosis: From pathophysiological mechanisms to translational medicine. Pharmacol. Ther. 2015, 146, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Shiomi, M. The History of the WHHL Rabbit, an Animal Model of Familial Hypercholesterolemia (I)—Contribution to the Elucidation of the Pathophysiology of Human Hypercholesterolemia and Coronary Heart Disease. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2020, 27, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Matsuhisa, F.; Kitajima, S.; Nishijima, K.; Akiyoshi, T.; Morimoto, M.; Fan, J. Transgenic Rabbit Models: Now and the Future. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mazur, P.; Leibo, S.P.; Seidel, G.E., Jr. Cryopreservation of the germplasm of animals used in biological and medical research: Importance, impact, status, and future directions. Biol. Reprod. 2007, 78, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Casellas, J.; Vidal-Roqueta, D.; Flores, E.; Casellas-Vidal, D.; Llach-Vila, M.; Salgas-Fina, R.; Casellas-Molas, P. Epistasis for founder specific inbreeding depression in rabbits. J. Hered. 2011, 102, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chai, C.K. Effects of inbreeding in rabbits. Inbred lines, discrete characters, breeding performance, and mortality. J. Hered. 1969, 60, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chai, C.K.; Degenhardt, K.H. Developmental anomaties in inbred rabbits. J. Hered. 1962, 53, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ragab, M.; Sánchez, J.P.; Baselga, M. Effective population size and inbreeding depression on litter size in rabbits. A case study. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2015, 132, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Isachenko, E.; Isachenko, V.; Katkov, I.I.; Dessole, S.; Nawroth, F. Vitrification of mammalian spermatozoa in the absence of cryoprotectants: From past practical difficulties to present success. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2003, 6, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Watson, P.F. The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 60–61, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Amidi, F.; Pazhohan, A.; Shabani Nashtaei, M.; Khodarahmian, M.; Nekoonam, S. The role of antioxidants in sperm freezing: A review. Cell Tissue Bank 2016, 17, 745–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Parrish, J.J.; Foote, R. Fertility of cooled and frozen rabbit sperm measured by competitive fertilization. Biol. Reprod. 1986, 35, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Mocé, E.; Vicente, J.S. Rabbit sperm cryopreservation: A review. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2009, 110, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mazur, P. The role of intracellular freezing in the death of cellscooled at supraoptimal rates. Cryobiology 1977, 14, 251–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Koshimoto, C.; Mazur, P. Effects of warming rate, temperature, and antifreeze proteins on the survival of mouse spermatozoa frozen at an optimal rate. Cryobiology 2002, 45, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Salamon, S.; Maxwell, W.M. Storage of ram semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 62, 77–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Arriola, J.; Foote, R.H. Accessory sperm as an indication of fertilizing ability of rabbit spermatozoa frozen in egg yolk-acetamide with detergent. J. Androl. 2001, 22, 458–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aires, V.A.; Hinsch, K.D.; Mueller-Schloesser, F.; Bogner, K.; Mueller-Schloesser, S.; Hinsch, E. In vitro and in vivo comparison of egg yolk-based and soybean lecithin-based extenders for cryopreservation of bovine semen. Theriogenology 2003, 60, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Watson, P.F.; Martin, I.C. Artificial insemination of sheep: The effect of semen diluents containing egg yolk on the fertility of ram semen. Theriogenology 1976, 6, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Amirat, L.; Tainturier, D.; Jeanneau, L.; Thorin, C.; Gerard, O.; Courtens, J.L.; Anton, M. Bull semen in vitro fertility after cryopreservation using egg yolk LDL: A comparison with Optidyl, a commercial egg yolk extender. Theriogenology 2004, 61, 895–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Moussa, M.; Matinet, V.; Trimeche, A.; Tainturier, D.; Anton, M. Low density lipoproteins extracted from hen egg yolk by an easy method: Cryoprotective effect on frozen-thawed bull semen. Theriogenology 2002, 57, 1695–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nishijima, K.; Kitajima, S.; Koshimoto, C.; Morimoto, M.; Watanabe, T.; Fan, J.; Matsuda, Y. Motility and fertility of rabbit sperm cryopreserved using soybean lecithin as an alternative to egg yolk. Theriogenology 2015, 84, 1172–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abe, Y.; Lee, D.S.; Sano, H.; Akiyama, K.; Yanagimoto-Ueta, Y.; Asano, T.; Suwa, Y.; Suzuki, H. Artificial insemination with canine spermatozoa frozen in a skim milk/glucose-based extender. J. Reprod. Dev. 2008, 54, 290–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Dorado, J.; Rodríguez, I.; Hidalgo, M. Cryopreservation of goat spermatozoa: Comparison of two freezing extenders based on post-thaw sperm quality and fertility rates after artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2007, 68, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fiser, P.S.; Fairfull, R.W. Combined effects of glycerol concentration, cooling velocity, and osmolality of skim milk diluents on cryopreservation of ram spermatozoa. Theriogenology 1986, 25, 473–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nakagata, N. Cryopreservation of mouse spermatozoa. Mamm. Genome 2000, 11, 572–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Papa, P.M.; Papa, F.O.; Oliveira, L.A.; Guasti, P.N.; Castilho, C.; Giometti, I.C. Different extenders in the cryopreservation of bovine epididymal spermatozoa. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2015, 161, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Scherzer, J.; Fayrer-Hosken, R.A.; Aceves, M.; Hurley, D.J.; Ray, L.E.; Jones, L.; Heusner, G.L. Freezing equine semen: The effect of combinations of semen extenders and glycerol on post-thaw motility. Aust. Vet. J. 2009, 87, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Varisli, O.; Scott, H.; Agca, C.; Agca, Y. The effects of cooling rates and type of freezing extenders on cryosurvival of rat sperm. Cryobiology 2013, 67, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. O’Shea, T.; Wales, R.G. Further studies of the deep freezing of rabbit spermatozoa in reconstituted skim milk powder. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1969, 22, 709–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Kumar, A.; Prasad, J.K.; Srivastava, N.; Ghosh, S.K. Strategies to minimize various stress-related freeze-thaw damages during conventional cryopreservation of mammalian spermatozoa. Biopreserv. Biobank 2019, 17, 603–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Aisen, E.G.; Medina, V.H.; Venturino, A. Cryopreservation and post-thawed fertility of ram semen frozen in different trehalose concentrations. Theriogenology 2002, 57, 1801–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Anchordoguy, T.J.; Rudolph, A.S.; Carpenter, J.F.; Crowe, J.H. Modes of interaction of cryoprotectants with membrane phospholipids during freezing. Cryobiology 1987, 24, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sieme, H.; Harriëtte Oldenhof, H.; Wolkers, W.F. Mode of action of cryoprotectants for sperm preservation. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2016, 169, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Curry, M.R.; Redding, B.J.; Watson, P.F. Determination of water permeability coefficient and its activation energy for rabbit spermatozoa. Cryobiology 1995, 32, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rasul, Z.; Ahmed, N.; Anzar, M. Antagonist effect of DMSO on the cryoprotection ability of glycerol during cryopreservation of buffalo sperm. Theriogenology 2007, 68, 813–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Si, W.; Hildebrandt, T.B.; Reid, C.; Krieg, R.; Ji, W.; Fassbender, M.; Hermes, R. The successful double cryopreservation of rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) semen in large volume using the directional freezing technique with reduced concentration of cryoprotectant. Theriogenology 2006, 65, 788–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hanada, A.; Nagase, H. Cryoprotective effects of some amides on rabbit spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1980, 60, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kashiwazaki, N.; Okuda, Y.; Seita, Y.; Hisamatsu, S.; Sonoki, S.; Shino, M.; Masaoka, T.; Inomata, T. Comparison of glycerol, lactamide, acetamide and dimethylsulfoxide as cryoprotectants of Japanese white rabbit spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Dev. 2006, 52, 511–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Okuda, Y.; Seita, Y.; Hisamatsu, S.; Sonoki, S.; Shino, M.; Masaoka, T.; Inomata, T.; Kamijo, S.; Kashiwazaki, N. Fertility of spermatozoa cryopreserved with 2% acetamide or glycerol through artificial insemination in the Japanese white rabbit. Exp. Anim. 2007, 56, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Simione, F.P., Jr. Key issues relating to the genetic stability and preservation of cells and cell banks. J. Parent. Sci. Technol. 1992, 46, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Isachenko, E.; Mallmann, P.; Rahimi, G.; Risopatrón, J.; Schulz, M.; Isachenko, V.; Sánchez, R. Vitrification technique-new possibilities for male gamete low temperature storage. In Current Frontiers in Cryobiology; Katkov, I.I., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; pp. 41–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Isachenko, E.; Isachenko, V.; Sanchez, R.; Katkov, I.I.; Kreienberg, R. Cryopreservation of spermatozoa. Old routine and new perspectives. In Principles and Practice of Fertility Preservation; Kim, D., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011; pp. 176–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mahadevan, M.; Trounson, A.O. Effect of cooling, freezing and thawing rates and storage conditions on preservation of human spermatozoa. Andrologia 1984, 16, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Rosato, M.; Iaffaldano, N. Cryopreservation of rabbit semen: Comparing the effects of different cryoprotectants, cryoprotectant-free vitrification, and the use of albumin plus osmoprotectants on sperm survival and fertility after standard vapor freezing and vitrification. Theriogenology 2013, 79, 508–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Nei, T.; Araki, T.; Matsusaka, T. Freezing injury to aerated and non-aerated cultures of Escherichia coli. In Freezing and Drying of Microorganisms; Nei, T., Ed.; University of Tokyo Press: Tokyo, Japan, 1969; pp. 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mocé, E.; Lavara, R.; Vicente, J.S. Effect of cooling rate to 5 °C, straw size and farm on fertilizing ability of cryopreserved rabbit sperm. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2010, 45, e1–e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Maeda, T.; Liu, E.; Nishijima, K.; Tanaka, M.; Yamaguchi, S.; Morimoto, M.; Watanabe, T.; Fan, J.; Kitajima, S. Effect of the primary cooling rate on the motility and fertility of the frozen-thawed rabbit spermatozoa. World Rabbit Sci. 2012, 20, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Di Iorio, M.; Colonna, M.A.; Miranda, M.; Principe, P.; Schiavitto, M.; Cerolini, S.; Manchisi, A.; Iaffaldano, N. Initial cooling time before freezing affects post-thaw quality and reproductive performance of rabbit semen. Anim. Sci. J. 2018, 89, 1240–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mocé, E.; Blanch, E.; Talaván, A.; de Castro, M.P.V. Reducing the time rabbit sperm are held at 5 °C negatively affects their fertilizing ability after cryopreservation. Theriogenology 2014, 82, 1049–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mocé, E.; Blanch, E.; Talaván, A.; Viudes de Castro, M.P. Effect of different freezing velocities on the quality and fertilising ability of cryopreserved rabbit spermatozoa. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2015, 27, 846–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Diskin, M.G. Review: Semen handling, time of insemination and insemination technique in cattle. Animal 2018, 12, s75–s84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chandler, J.E.; Adkinson, R.W.; Nebel, R.L. Thawing optimums for bovine spermatozoa processed by three methods and packaged in Continental and French straws. J. Dairy Sci. 1984, 67, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Correa, J.R.; Pace, M.M.; Zavos, P.M. Relationships among frozen-thawed sperm characteristics accessed via the routine semen analysis, sperm functional tests and fertility of bulls in an artificial insemination program. Theriogenology 1997, 48, 721–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Eriksson, B.M.; Rodriguez-Martinez, H. Effect of freezing and thawing rates on the post-thaw viability of boar spermatozoa frozen in FlatPacks and Maxi-straws. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 63, 205–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Senger, P.L. Handling frozen bovine semenfactors which influence viability and fertility. Theriogenology 1980, 13, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mocé, E.; Vicente, J.S.; Lavara, R. Effect of freezing-thawing protocols on the performance of semen from three rabbit lines after artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2003, 60, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, Y.; Foote, R.H. Survival of rabbit spermatozoa frozen and thawed at different rates with and without seeding. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1994, 35, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Stranzinger, G.F.; Maurer, R.R.; Paufler, S.K. Fertility of frozen rabbit semen. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1971, 2, 111–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Awad, M.M.; Kishk, W.; Hassenin, A.M.; El-Alamy, M.A. Freezing rabbit semen in pellet form using cold surface of paraffin wax compared to straws. In Proceedings of the 7th World Rabbit Congress, Valencia, Spain, 4–7 July 2000; Volume 8, pp. 89–95, ISSN 2308-1910. [Google Scholar]
  62. Seki, S.; Mazur, P. Effect of warming rate on the survival of vitrified mouse oocytes and on the recrystallization of intracellular ice. Biol. Reprod. 2008, 79, 727–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Seki, S.; Basaki, K.; Komatsu, Y.; Fukuda, Y.; Yano, M.; Matsuo, Y.; Obata, T.; Matsuda, Y.; Nishijima, K. Vitrification of one-cell mouse embryos in cryotubes. Cryobiology 2018, 81, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zhu, Z.; Fan, X.; Lv, Y.; Zhang, N.; Fan, C.; Zhang, P.; Zeng, W. Vitamin E analogue improves rabbit sperm quality during the process of cryopreservation through its antioxidative action. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0145383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Zhu, Z.; Ren, Z.; Fan, X.; Pan, Y.; Lv, S.; Pan, C.; Lei, A.; Zeng, W. Cysteine protects rabbit spermatozoa against reactive oxygen species-induced damages. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0181110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Zhu, Z.; Fan, X.; Lv, Y.; Lin, Y.; Wu, D.; Zeng, W. Glutamine protects rabbit spermatozoa against oxidative stress via glutathione synthesis during cryopreservation. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2017, 29, 2183–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhu, Z.; Fan, X.; Pan, Y.; Lu, Y.; Zeng, W. Trehalose improves rabbit sperm quality during cryopreservation. Cryobiology 2017, 75, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zhu, Z.; Li, R.; Lv, Y.; Zeng, W. Melatonin protects rabbit spermatozoa from cryo-damage via decreasing oxidative stress. Cryobiology 2019, 88, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Fadl, A.M.; Ghallab, A.R.M.; Abou-Ahmed, M.M.; Moawad, A.R. Melatonin can improve viability and functional integrity of cooled and frozen/thawed rabbit spermatozoa. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2021, 56, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Abdelnour, S.A.; Hassan, M.A.E.; Mohammed, A.K.; Alhimaidi, A.R.; Al-Gabri, N.; Al-Khaldi, K.O.; Swelum, A.A. The effect of adding different levels of curcumin and its nanoparticles to extender on post-thaw quality of cryopreserved rabbit sperm. Animals 2020, 10, 1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Maya-Soriano, M.J.; Taberner, E.; Sabés-Alsina, M.; Piles, M.; Lopez-Bejar, M. Absence of beneficial effects on rabbit sperm cell cryopreservation by several antioxidant agents. Zygote 2015, 23, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ahmad, E.; Naseer, Z.; Aksoy, M. Supplementation of extender with reduced gluatathione (GSH) preserve rabbit sperm quality after cryopreservation. In Proceedings of the 11th World Rabbit Congress, Qingdao, China, 15–18 June 2016; pp. 171–174, ISSN 2308-1910. [Google Scholar]
  73. Marco-Jimenez, F.; Lavara, R.; Vicente, J.S.; Viudes-de-Castro, M.P. Cryopreservation of rabbit spermatozoa with freezing media supplemented with reduced and oxidised glutathione. Cryo Lett. 2006, 27, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  74. Roche, M.; Rondeau, P.; Singh, N.R.; Tarnus, E.; Bourdon, E. The antioxidant properties of serum albumin. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582, 1783–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ashrafi, I.; Kohram, H.; Ardabili, F.F. Antioxidative effects of melatonin on kinetics, microscopic and oxidative parameters of cryopreserved bull spermatozoa. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2013, 139, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Matsuoka, T.; Imai, H.; Kohno, H.; Fukui, Y. Effects of bovine serum albumin and trehalose in semen diluents for improvement of frozen-thawed ram spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Dev. 2006, 52, 675–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Naijian, H.R.; Kohram, H.; ZareShahneh, A.; Sharafi, M. Effects of various concentrations of BSA on microscopic and oxidative parameters of Mahabadi goat semen following the freeze–thaw process. Small Rumin. Res. 2013, 113, 371–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Uysal, O.; Bucak, O.M. Effects of Oxidized Glutathione, Bovine Serum Albumin, Cysteine and Lycopene on the Quality of Frozen-Thawed Ram Semen. Acta Vet. Brno 2007, 76, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bandeira, A.M.P.; Matos, J.E.; Maria, A.N.; Carneiro, P.C.F.; Purdy, P.H.; Bucak, O.M.; Azevedo, H.C. The effects of gelatin supplementation prior to cooling on ram semen quality and fertility. Anim. Reprod. 2018, 15, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Nagy, S.; Sinkovics, G.; Kovács, A. Viability and acrosome integrity of rabbit spermatozoa processed in a gelatin-supplemented extender. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2002, 70, 283–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ragab, A.A.; El-Sherbieny, M.A.; El-Siefy, E.M.; Adel-Khalek, A.E. Effect of gelatin supplementation on the quality and fertility of rabbit spermatozoa preserved at room or refrigerator temperature degrees. J. Anim. Poult. Prod. 2011, 2, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cortell, C.; de Castro, M.P.V. Effect of gelatin addition to freezing extender on rabbit semen parameters and reproductive performance. In Proceedings of the 9th World Rabbit Congress, Verona, Italy, 10–13 June 2008; pp. 327–332. [Google Scholar]
  83. El-Sherbieny, M.A.; Kalaba, Z.M.; El-Siefy, E.M.E.; Ragab, A.A. Freezing and Fertilizing Capacity of Frozen Rabbit Semen Extended with Gelatin Addition. Asian J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 6, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Carpenter, J.F.; Hansen, T.N. Antifreeze protein modulates cell survival during cryopreservation: Mediation through influence on ice crystal growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 8953–8957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Crevel, R.W.; Fedyk, J.K.; Spurgeon, M.J. Antifreeze proteins: Characteristics, occurrence and human exposure. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2002, 40, 899–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Nishijima, K.; Tanaka, M.; Sakai, Y.; Koshimoto, C.; Morimoto, M.; Watanabe, T.; Fan, J.; Kitajima, S. Effects of type III antifreeze protein on sperm and embryo cryopreservation in rabbit. Cryobiology 2014, 69, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Rubinsky, B.; Arav, A.; Fletcher, G.L. Hypothermic protection a fundamental property of “antifreeze” proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1991, 180, 566–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tekin, K.; Daşkın, A. Effect of polyvinyl alcohol on survival and function of angora buck spermatozoa following cryopreservation. Cryobiology 2019, 89, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Raza, S.; Uçan, U.; Aksoy, M.; Erdoğan, G.; Ceylan, A.; Serin, I. Silk protein sericin pretreatment enhances osmotic tolerance and post-thaw sperm quality but reduces the ability of sperm cells to undergo in vitro induced acrosome reaction in rabbit. Cryobiology 2019, 90, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Nishijima, K.; Yamaguchi, S.; Tanaka, M.; Sakai, Y.; Koshimoto, C.; Morimoto, M.; Watanabe, T.; Fan, J.; Kitajima, S. Effects of cholesterol-loaded cyclodextrins on the rate and the quality of motility in frozen and thawed rabbit sperm. Exp. Anim. 2014, 63, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Aksoy, M.; Akman, O.; Lehimcioğlu, N.C.; Erdem, H. Cholesterol-loaded cyclodextrin enhances osmotic tolerance and inhibits the acrosome reaction in rabbit spermatozoa. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2010, 120, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Gil, L.; Olaciregui, M.; Luño, V.; Malo, C.; González, N.; Martínez, F. Current status of freeze-drying technology to preserve domestic animals sperm. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2014, 49, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Liu, J.L.; Kusakabe, H.; Chang, C.C.; Suzuki, H.; Schmidt, D.W.; Julian, M.; Pfeffer, R.; Bormann, C.L.; Tian, X.C.; Yanagimachi, R.; et al. Freeze-dried sperm fertilization leads to full-term development in rabbits. Biol. Reprod. 2004, 70, 1776–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Li, Q.Y.; Hou, J.; Chen, Y.F.; An, X.R. Full-term development of rabbit embryos produced by ICSI with sperm frozen in liquid nitrogen without cryoprotectants. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2010, 45, 717–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Mocé, E.; Lavara, R.; Vicente, J.S. Influence of the donor male on the fertility of frozen-thawed rabbit sperm after artificial insemination of females of different genotypes. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2005, 40, 516–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kulíková, B.; Oravcová, M.; Baláži, A.; Supuka, P.; Chrenek, P. Factors affecting storage of Slovak native rabbit semen in the gene bank. Zygote 2017, 25, 592–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Martínez-Soto, J.C.; Landeras, J.; Gadea, J. Spermatozoa and seminal plasma fatty acids as predictors of cryopreservation success. Andrology 2013, 1, 365–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Rickard, J.P.; Leahy, T.; Soleilhavoup, C.; Tsikis, G.; Labas, V.; Harichaux, G.; Lynch, G.W.; Druart, X.; de Graaf, S.P. The identification of proteomic markers of sperm freezing resilience in ram seminal plasma. J. Proteom. 2015, 126, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Vilagran, I.; Castillo, J.; Bonet, S.; Sancho, S.; Yeste, M.; Estanyol, J.M.; Oliva, R. Acrosin-binding protein (ACRBP) and triosephosphate isomerase (TPI) are good markers to predict boar sperm freezing capacity . Theriogenology 2013, 80, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Vilagran, I.; Yeste, M.; Sancho, S.; Castillo, J.; Oliva, R.; Bonet, S. Comparative analysis of boar seminal plasma proteome from different freezability ejaculates and identification of Fibronectin 1 as sperm freezability marker. Andrology 2015, 3, 345–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Wang, P.; Wang, Y.F.; Wang, H.; Wang, C.W.; Zan, L.S.; Hu, J.H.; Li, Q.W.; Jia, Y.H.; Ma, G.J. HSP90 expression correlation with the freezing resistance of bull sperm. Zygote 2014, 22, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Yeste, M.; Estrada, E.; Casas, I.; Bonet, S.; Rodríguez-Gil, J.E. Good and bad freezability boar ejaculates differ in the integrity of nucleoprotein structure after freeze-thawing but not in ROS levels. Theriogenology 2013, 79, 929–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Casares-Crespo, L.; Fernández-Serrano, P.; Vicente, J.S.; Marco-Jiménez, F.; Viudes-de-Castro, M.P. Rabbit seminal plasma proteome: The importance of the genetic origin. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2018, 189, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Bezerra, M.J.B.; Arruda-Alencar, J.M.; Martins, J.A.M.; Viana, A.G.A.; Viana Neto, A.M.; Rêgo, J.P.A.; Oliveira, R.V.; Lobo, M.; Moreira, A.C.O.; Moreira, R.A.; et al. Major seminal plasma proteome of rabbits and associations with sperm quality. Theriogenology 2019, 128, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Baker, R.D.; Dziuk, P.J.; Norton, H.W. Effect of volume of semen, number of sperm and drugs on transport of sperm in artificially inseminated gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 1968, 27, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Flowers, W.L. Increasing fertilization rate of boars: Influence of number and quality of spermatozoa inseminated. J. Anim. Sci. 2002, 80, E47–E53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Langford, G.A.; Marcus, G.J. Influence of sperm number and seminal plasma on fertility of progestagen-treated sheep in confinement. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1982, 65, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Berker, B.; Şükür, Y.E.; Kahraman, K.; Atabekoğlu, C.S.; Sönmezer, M.; Özmen, B.; Ateş, C. Absence of rapid and linear progressive motile spermatozoa “grade A” in semen specimens: Does it change intrauterine insemination outcomes? Urology 2012, 80, 1262–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Bollendorf, A.; Check, J.H.; Lurie, D. Evaluation of the effect of the absence of sperm with rapid and linear progressive motility on subsequent pregnancy rates following intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization. J. Androl. 1996, 17, 550–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Nagata, M.P.B.; Endo, K.; Ogata, K.; Yamanaka, K.; Egashira, J.; Katafuchi, N.; Yamanouchi, T.; Matsuda, H.; Goto, Y.; Sakatani, M.; et al. Live births from artificial insemination of microfluidic-sorted bovine spermatozoa characterized by trajectories correlated with fertility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E3087–E3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Fischer, B.; Chavatte-Palmer, P.; Viebahn, C.; Navarrete Santos, A.; Duranthon, V. Rabbit as a reproductive model for human health. Reproduction 2012, 144, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the essential process of sperm cryopreservation. (A) Semen is collected with an artificial vagina; (B) semen is diluted with a freezing extender; (C) sperm solution is cooled at slow rate (with a programming incubator); (D) sperm solution packed in freezing straws are frozen in vapor of liquid nitrogen; (E) vitrification is another option for sperm freezing; (F) sperms are cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen, and (G) sperms are thawed by immersion in a warm bath.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the essential process of sperm cryopreservation. (A) Semen is collected with an artificial vagina; (B) semen is diluted with a freezing extender; (C) sperm solution is cooled at slow rate (with a programming incubator); (D) sperm solution packed in freezing straws are frozen in vapor of liquid nitrogen; (E) vitrification is another option for sperm freezing; (F) sperms are cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen, and (G) sperms are thawed by immersion in a warm bath.
Animals 11 01220 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of temperature changes during sperm cryopreservation process and associated problems.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of temperature changes during sperm cryopreservation process and associated problems.
Animals 11 01220 g002
Table 1. Effects of supplements on quality of thawed rabbit sperm frozen by slow freezing method.
Table 1. Effects of supplements on quality of thawed rabbit sperm frozen by slow freezing method.
Effective Concetration Sperm QualityEXtender AdditivesDilution Rate (Sperm:Extender)Referrence
Antioxdants
Trolox (vitamine E analogue)200 μMImproved4% DMSO
20% egg yolk
1:1[64]
Cysteine5, 7.5 mMImproved[65]
Glutamine20 mMImproved[66]
Trehalone100 mMImproved[67]
Melatonin0.1 mMImproved[68]
1.0 mMImprovedINRA−82
(0.15% skim milk)
1:1[69]
Oxidised glutathione0.5 mMNo effect3.5 M DMSO
0.1 M sucrose
1:1[73]
Reduceed glutathione0.5 mMNo effect
4 mMImproved[72]
Curcumin nanoparticles1.5 μg/mL/0.3Improved7% glycerol
20% egg yolk
1:4[70]
Retinol50, 100, 200 μMNo effectGent B® *
(egg yolk, glycerol)
1:2[71]
Retinyl0.282, 2.82 μg/mLDeteriorated
Bovine serum albumin5, 30, 60 mg/mLNo effect
0.5%Improved10% DMSO
0.1 M sucrose/0.1 M treharose
1:1[46]
Gelatin2%No effect3.5 M DMSO
0.1 M sucrose.
1:1[82]
2%Improved2% glycerol
10% egg yolk
1:5[83]
Antifreeze protein III 0.1, 1 mg/mLImproved20% egg yolk1:5[86]
Polyvinyl alcohol 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 2 %Improved5 a, 4 b, 3 c, 3 d, 2 e% glycerol
5 % egg yolk
N/A[88]
Sericin 0.1%Improved16% Me2SO
2% sucrose
1:2[89]
Cholesterol-loaded cyclodextrin 1 mg/40 × 106 spermImproved6% acetamide
20% egg yolk
1:5[90]
*: Minitüb, Tiefenbach, Germany. Concetrations of glycerol when supplemented with a: 0.001, b: 0.01, c: 0.1, d: 1, e: 2% of polyvinl alchool.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nishijima, K.; Kitajima, S.; Matsuhisa, F.; Niimi, M.; Wang, C.-c.; Fan, J. Strategies for Highly Efficient Rabbit Sperm Cryopreservation. Animals 2021, 11, 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051220

AMA Style

Nishijima K, Kitajima S, Matsuhisa F, Niimi M, Wang C-c, Fan J. Strategies for Highly Efficient Rabbit Sperm Cryopreservation. Animals. 2021; 11(5):1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051220

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nishijima, Kazutoshi, Shuji Kitajima, Fumikazu Matsuhisa, Manabu Niimi, Chen-chi Wang, and Jianglin Fan. 2021. "Strategies for Highly Efficient Rabbit Sperm Cryopreservation" Animals 11, no. 5: 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051220

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop