Next Article in Journal
Effect of Total Starch and Resistant Starch in Commercial Extruded Dog Foods on Gastric Emptying in Siberian Huskies
Next Article in Special Issue
Ecological Analysis of the Helminth Community of Microtus lusitanicus (Gerbe, 1879) (Rodentia) in Asturias (NW Spain)
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Respiratory Microbiome and the Use of Tracheal Lavage as a Diagnostic Tool in Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtles (Lepidochelys kempii)
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Invasive Bank Vole (Myodes glareolus): A Model System for Studying Parasites and Ecoimmunology during a Biological Invasion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ecological Analysis of the Helminth Community of the Wood Mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus, along an 18-Year Post-Fire Regeneration Period in a Mediterranean Ecosystem

by
Sandra Sáez-Durán
,
Ángela L. Debenedetti
,
Sandra Sainz-Elipe
,
Mireia Sabater-Tena
,
María Teresa Galán-Puchades
and
Màrius Vicent Fuentes
*
Parasites & Health Research Group, Departament de Farmàcia i Tecnologia Farmacèutica i Parasitologia, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de València, Av. Vicent Andrés Estellés s/n, Burjassot, 46100 València, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(10), 2926; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102926
Submission received: 6 July 2021 / Revised: 28 September 2021 / Accepted: 6 October 2021 / Published: 10 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Helminths of Small Mammals)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

After a wildfire, especially in Mediterranean ecosystems, the vegetation starts to recover gradually but appears regenerated after a decade. However, the study of helminth parasites of the wood mouse, the most important post-fire recolonizer mammal in the western Mediterranean forests, allowed us to elucidate the reality of this process more accurately, mainly due to the, sometimes complex, life cycles of the helminths using other hosts (vertebrates and invertebrates) to complete them. Thus, the comparative analysis of various aspects (biodiversity and kinds of life cycles) of the helminth community of the wood mouse, as well as the influence of some external factors (related to the environment and its periodical post-fire regeneration) and internal factors (related to the population of the wood mouse), between the burned area and a non-burned area used as control, reveals the biological indicators (indicators of the situation/evolution of a process) of the post-fire regeneration process and its true state. The current study confirms the important role of the helminths of the wood mouse as biological indicators and the influence that climate variables exercise on the quality and evolution of the post-fire regeneration process in Mediterranean ecosystems.

Abstract

The role of helminths of the wood mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus, as biological indicators of the post-fire regeneration process in Serra Calderona Natural Park, a Mediterranean forest ecosystem located between the provinces of València and Castelló (Valencian Country, Spain), has been analysed for almost twenty years. The helminth ecological analysis of 917 A. sylvaticus (675 originating from the burned area and 242 originating from the control area) has been carried out between the 2nd and 18th post-fire years. The influence of intrinsic (host population density, sex and age) and extrinsic (site, period and year of capture, climate variables) factors on the post-fire evolution of the helminth community of the wood mouse, and the biodiversity, species richness and life cycle of the helminth species was studied. Taking into account the most important results obtained, various aspects of the helminth community dynamics of the wood mouse are confirmed as biological indicators of the post-fire regeneration process in Mediterranean ecosystems. The still existing differences between the two areas are mainly related to the influence of climate variables on the post-fire regeneration process. Moreover, the important role that helminth parasites of the wood mouse play as biological indicators of this process in Mediterranean ecosystems is demonstrated.

1. Introduction

The close relationship between parasites and their hosts has made it possible to propose parasites as biological tags of biological aspects, population dynamics and even of the phylogeny of their hosts [1,2,3,4] as well as biological indicators of the impact of environmental disasters, whether they be aquatic or terrestrial [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
With regard to the contribution of parasites to the ecology and the interactions of their host with the ecosystem, based on the trophic transmission of numerous parasite species, the observations of Marcogliese [19] stand out. The knowledge of the life cycle of parasites, especially those with an indirect heteroxenous cycle, is relevant because it can be related with the composition of the host diet. In the case of small mammals, the importance of the ingestion of invertebrates by a host species could be elucidated from the composition and the structure of its helminth community, both in species with mainly an insectivorous diet as well as those with a granivorous diet. The presence of certain parasite species is able to provide valid information about the fauna of invertebrates present in the study area, especially when the specificity of a parasite at its intermediate host level is either oioxenous (the species level) or stenoxenous (the genus level). Moreover, those helminth species with a heteroxenous cycle that use small mammals as intermediate or paratenic hosts, can reveal information about the presence of the definitive hosts, mainly carnivorous and raptors. On the other hand, helminth species with a direct or monoxenous cycle can provide information on the environmental conditions of the study area as the presence and the viability of certain resistant stages of the parasite will be favoured or biased depending on the climatology and seasonal variability.
In Europe, helminth parasites of sylvatic rodents have been the subject of numerous studies, both at a continental as well as an insular level. Some of these studies are merely limited to the report of the helminth species present in certain rodent host species. However, other studies have analysed the ecological aspects that influence the helminth/host relationship in depth. These studies were mainly carried out in central and eastern Europe, Finland and the British Isles [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31], as well as several Mediterranean insular enclaves [32,33,34]. In the Iberian Peninsula, relevant studies were carried out in: Albufera of València [35], Serra da Malcata, Portugal [36], Doñana National Park [37], Serra Calderona Natural Park (NP), Castelló-València [38], Sierra de Espuña, Murcia [39], Sierra de Gredos, Ávila [40], Dunas de Mira, Portugal [41], and the Erro river valley, Navarre [42].
Parasites do not only have the capacity to regulate the host population, they also provide information on possible changes in the behaviour of their hosts, as mathematically demonstrated by the theories of Anderson and May [43,44,45,46,47,48]. Theories that have been subsequently backed up on numerous occasions by field studies, mainly those carried out using annual series and comparing vulnerable areas affected by an environmental disaster to stable control areas [13,14,16,17,18].
Wildfires have had the most devastating and frequent impact on Mediterranean ecosystems throughout the last 150 years, affecting the stability of these forest ecosystems together with the soil, vegetation and fauna [49,50,51,52], given that they influence soil preservation and the recovery of the vegetation and fauna.
The forest regeneration process and the evolution of the ecosystem take time and are always impacted by the environmental conditions, especially the climate, which can be evaluated considering the quality of soil preservation and the recovery of the vegetation and fauna [50,51,53,54].
The impact of a wildfire on terrestrial vertebrates produces, as in the case of invertebrates, a high degree of mortality. However, after the wildfire those animals that fled will return, and those who died will be replaced by others of the same or different species. This process is the beginning of the animal recolonisation, which takes place parallel to the regeneration of the forest vegetation. Numerous studies carried out in various Mediterranean forest ecosystems, mostly in Western Europe (among others: [53,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63]) but also in other Mediterranean forest enclaves, such as in Australia, concluded that small mammals become, by means of their recolonisation process, the most valuable biological indicators of the forest regeneration. In the European Mediterranean ecosystems, the wood mouse, A. sylvaticus, a generalist rodent whose diet is mainly based on grains and insects, has shown itself to be the most important and efficient post-fire recolonizer [53].
However, this recognised role of small mammals as biological indicators is limited in time, subsequently being replaced by their helminth parasites (trematodes, cestodes, nematodes and acantocephalans) as biological indicators of the overall regeneration of the ecosystem as they are bioecologically more demanding. Consequently, the study of helminth parasites reveals, at any given moment, the state and the tendencies of the post-fire regeneration process [6,9,10].
There are only a few studies of the use of helminths of small mammals as biological indicators of the post-fire regeneration process in Mediterranean forest enclaves, and most of them, with the exception of that of Spratt in Australia [5], were undertaken in the east and the northeast of the Iberian Peninsula and the eastern Pyrenees [9,64,65]. Other research carried out, for example in Montseny NP [66], was not long term.
After the wildfire of 1992 in Serra Calderona NP, a multidisciplinary project concerning the role of helminths of small mammals as biological indicators of the post-fire regeneration process was initiated. Hitherto, various periods have been analysed. The results of which have shown the trends of the helminth community of the wood mouse, A. sylvaticus, from a bioecological point of view, between the 2nd and 5th post-fire year (PFY) [14] and between the 2nd and 10th PFY [17], as well as from the component species point of view during the 2nd to 10th PFY period [67]. Other mammals, such as the common shrew, C. russula, were analysed from the component species point of view during the 2nd to 11th PFY period [13], and the Mediterranean mouse, M. spretus, during the 2nd to 14th PFY period [18].
The main objective of the present study is to verify the role of the helminths of the wood mouse as biological indicators of the post-fire regeneration process in Serra Calderona NP during the 2nd to 18th PFY period. The specific objectives are: to characterize the composition and structure of the helminth community of the wood mouse in this Mediterranean enclave; to analyse the annual changes in the helminth community of the wood mouse in the burned area, in relation to the nature of the biological cycles of the helminth species and the helminth community richness and diversity as well as the influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors.

2. Materials and Methods

The study area, the Serra Calderona NP, is a Mediterranean ecosystem located between the provinces of Castelló and València in the Valencian Country, Spain (39°35′–39°51′ N, 0°15′–0°43′ W) (Figure 1). This mountain range, which covers approximately 52,000 ha of forests and cultivated land untended, suffered a large wildfire at the end of the summer of 1992 devastating a total of 9500 ha.
The Serra Calderona NP has a typical Mediterranean climate, with irregular rainfall and intense summer droughts. The eastern and meridional regions correspond to the thermomediterranean bioclimatic setting with a dry ombroclimate. In contrast, the westernmost and septentrional regions are included in the mesomediterranean bioclimate, with a little more rainfall but not fully qualifying as a subhumid ombroclimate [68]. Chorologically, the vegetation corresponds to the Western Mediterranean sub-region [69,70]. As a consequence of the continuous degradation due to anthropization (growing of crops, charcoal production, animal grazing and building activities), as well as numerous wildfires, potential vegetation is largely restricted to various substitution stages, principally littoral kermes oak (Quercus cocciferae–Pistacietum lentisci) and continental kermes oak (Rhamno lycioidis–Quercetum cocciferae), together with different types of shrubs and pastures.
In February 1994, during the winter of the 2nd PFY, a multidisciplinary project concerning the post-fire recolonization dynamics of small mammals, mainly the wood mouse, A. sylvaticus, and the study of their helminth parasites as biological indicators in the process of post-fire regeneration, was initiated.

2.1. Zoological and Helminthological Procedures

Three trapping sites were set up within the study area for annual–seasonal follow-ups, two in the burned area (Figure 2 and Figure 3) and one in the control area (Figure 4). The control area presents the same ecological conditions as the burned area before the fire and is situated in a straight line about 6 km away from the affected area in order to minimize nearness effects resulting from the mobility of the small mammals. The two burned sites are considered together as the burned area as both sites are very close and have a great ecological similarity, minimizing, moreover, the negative effect of the sampling method for the helminthological study. A comprehensive description of the trapping method and study procedures was previously reported [10,38,53]. The trapping method used to capture small mammals is based on the square plot (quadrate) technique using hand-made wire-mesh traps and the capture–release method. On a seasonal basis, at intervals of three to four months, 55 traps were placed at night within a distance of 10–15 m forming a square in each of the three study sites. The trapping took place during three consecutive days checking each trap every 24 hours, and to minimise the influence of the weather on the trapping success. Trapping sessions (all three days) were postponed on days with heavy rainfall or extreme temperatures predicted. The captured animals were identified at species level and weighed, sexual activity was determined (testicular descent in males, and vulvar opening, pregnant and lactating conditions in females were checked), they were marked with a lasting colorant on different parts of the abdomen and/or the thorax and a subcutaneous microchip was introduced using an individual disposable syringe (Avid® Inc.). The animals were then released at the place of capture [71] (Figure 5).
The wood mouse population density in each area (burned and control) was determined by the number of individuals captured per 100 trap-nights, and was analysed to determine possible differences due to the post-fire regeneration process [71].
During the study period, from the 2nd (1994) to the 18th (2010) PFY, 217 prospections were carried out with a total of 29,011 traps and 3353 small mammals captured, i.e., with a success rate of 11.56%. Animals captured were: 2791 wood mice, Apodemus sylvaticus, (9.62%); 283 Mediterranean mice, Mus spretus, (0.98%); 25 black rats, Rattus rattus, (0.09%); 11 garden dormice, Eliomys quercinus, (0.04%); 243 greater white-toothed shrews, Crocidura russula, (0.84%).
Dead individuals and, between the period from the 2nd to the 5th PFY only, fewer than 10% of specimens captured alive that were euthanized by exposure to CO2-saturated atmosphere, were dissected and used for the helminthological study. As previously described [14,38], all helminths were collected and preserved. Trematodes and cestodes were preserved in 70% ethanol, stained with Grenacher’s boracic and alcoholic chlorhydric carmine, respectively, differentiated with acidified ethanol, dehydrated in an alcohol series, cleared with xylene and mounted in Canada balsam. Nematodes were preserved in ethanol 70% and cleared in Amann lactophenol. All helminths were identified at specific level based on their morphology and morphometry and according to the most relevant descriptions and findings of Trematoda [72], Cestoda [73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80] and Nematoda [81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93]. However, a number of specimens could not be specifically classified due to their limited development.
Herein, the helminthoecological analysis of 917 individual wood mice, A. sylvaticus, captured prior to September 2010, the summer of the eighteenth PFY, is included. Six hundred and seventy five individual hosts originated from the burned area and 242 from the control area. The number of A. sylvaticus captured in each PFY, as well as their annual population density, expressed by the number of individuals captured per 100 trap-nights for the burned and the control areas are summarized in Table 1.

2.2. Helminth Community Analysis

A global comparison of the burned and the control area was conducted. The analysis of the helminth community composition and structure for both areas was carried out considering each particular life cycle and calculating the prevalence, mean abundance, median intensity and range [94]. Where possible, standard non-parametric tests were applied [95].
As proposed by Fuentes et al. [14,96], two different types of life cycles for helminths were considered: helminths classified as FES, which have a free-environmental infectious stage for the wood mouse, and helminths classified as no-FES, invertebrate-borne helminths, which use at least one invertebrate as intermediate host. Moreover, nematode species with a direct or monoxenous life cycle were also classified into three different groups, i.e., ageohelminths, pseudogeohelminths and geohelminths. Ageohelminths include those nematodes that release embryonated and directly infective eggs, or that embryonate in a short period of less than four hours, such as species of the genus Syphacia. Pseudogeohelminths are nematodes that release non-embryonated eggs, which require a development period usually of 2–3 weeks depending on the climate, in the environment to embryonate and, consequently, be infective, such as species of the genus Trichuris. Geohelminths are those nematodes that have a free-living larval stage in the environment as the infective form, such as species of the genus Heligmosomoides.
The analysis of the helminth community components was carried out by means of calculating the frequency of occurrence of the number of helminth species, which refers to the infracommunities of the host, i.e., to the number of helminth species present in each host individual and expressed as a percentage, showing the distribution of the helminth community in the host population [14,17].
Helminth community diversity describes the composition of a community in terms of the number of species present and some factor that weighs the relative evenness of distribution of each species [94]. Its analysis was completed using the following indices: Shannon index (H) [97,98]; Simpson index (D), expressed as 1-D [98,99]; Berger–Parker index (d), expressed as 1-d [98,100,101]; Shannon evenness (E) [98,102].
The helminth infracommunity structure was established through the analysis of the species richness (considering the number of helminth species present in each infracommunity and expressed as the mean of helminth species present in each host population), the Brillouin index (HB) [97,98], Brillouin index for infected hosts only and percentage of infected hosts.
The role played by intrinsic factors (host age and sex, and host population density) and extrinsic factors (site, season and year of capture, and five climate variables) (Table 2) in determining the species richness (expressed through the number of helminth species), and the helminth community diversity (expressed by the five diversity indices) of the wood mouse, as well as the prevalence of the different types of life cycles was analysed.
Data of climate variables were obtained from six weather stations of AEMET (Spanish Meteorological Agency) located in the burned and in the control areas. Annual data, average or accumulated values, related to temperature and precipitation, respectively, were obtained from monthly data of the three stations located in each study area (Table 3).
As seasonal effects are strongly related to each PFY, the period of capture (i.e. season of capture linked to the year of capture) was considered as an independent variable. Additionally, the analysis was carried out individually for each area to allow for the consideration of the effect of the fire and the regeneration process from another point of view, i.e., showing the influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on each area separately.
Climate data and host population density, values belonging to the year before capture, were correlated with the annual values of the prevalence of different kind of life cycles and values of species richness and the five diversity indices by means of the Spearman correlation coefficient (Rho); prevalence was previously transformed logarithmically, log (X/1 - X), being X the centesimal expression of the percentages.
The influence of the other intrinsic and extrinsic factors, different than climate variables and host density, on the dependent variables, was carried out using a binary logistic regression (BLR) in the case of prevalence of the different kind of life cycles, and using a multifactorial general linear model (specifically ANOVA) in the case of species richness and Brillouin index. A t-test was used to compare statistical differences between the PFY values of Shannon, Simpson, and Berger–Parker indices, as well as Shannon evenness, in both areas.
Statistical analyses were carried out using StatView 5.0 (SAS Institute Inc) and IBM SPSS Statistics 26 (IBM Corporation) for Windows software packages. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Helminth Community Analysis

The helminthological analysis of the 917 wood mice captured in Serra Calderona NP revealed that the helminth community of the wood mouse in this enclave is composed of a total of sixteen helminth species (Figure 6) and some unidentified nematode larvae, with a total helminth parasitation of 85.06%. Selected characteristics of these species, such as the site of helminth parasitation in the wood mouse, their type of life cycle and other relevant information related to it, are shown in Table 4. The cestode species Hymenolepis straminea and Gallegoides arfaai were detected in the burned area only.
Total helminth parasitation was 87.70% in the burned and 77.69% in the control area; this difference being statistically significant (χ2 = 13.291; P = 0.0003; df = 1).
Ten of the 16 helminth species are considered helminth component species, with a prevalence above 10% in most post-fire years studied: the larva of the cestode Taenia parva, found in the abdominal cavity; the intestinal catenotaenid cestodes Pseudocatenotaenia matovi and Skrjabinotaenia lobata; the pseudogeohelminth nematodes Trichuris muris and Eucoleus bacillatus; the geohelminth nematode Heligmosomoides polygyrus; the ageohelminth nematodes Syphacia stroma and Syphacia frederici; the diheteroxenous nematodes Aonchotheca annulosa and Mastophorus muris. Among these helminth component species, Syphacia stroma was the most prevalent and abundant species, while T. parva was the least prevalent and abundant in the burned area; H. polygyrus was the most prevalent and S. frederici was the most abundant species, while S. lobata was the least in the control area (Table 5).
Concerning the prevalence of the five types of life cycles considered in the study, the higher prevalence of all of them in the burned area, with the only exception being geohelminth nematodes that are more prevalent in the control area, stands out, with all of these differences being statistically significant (Table 6).
More than 50% of parasitized hosts have helminth infracommunities composed of one or two helminth species in both areas, reaching infracommunities of up to nine species in one individual wood mouse only, captured in the burned area (Figure 7). Moreover, the frequency of the number of helminth species corresponds, in both areas, to a random or Poisson distribution.
The values of the Shannon, Simpson, Berger–Parker and Shannon evenness indices (Table 7) reflect the diversity/uniformity of the helminth community in both areas. The slightly higher values of the three diversity indices in the burned area when compared to the control area reflect that the helminth community in the area in regeneration is somewhat more diverse. However, there were no significant statistical differences between the annual values of these indices in both areas.
Table 8 shows the diversity of the infracommunities of the burned and control areas determined by species richness and the Brillouin index values, including uninfected animals as well as values for infected hosts alone, revealing an almost similar biodiversity in both areas but with higher values in the area affected by the wildfire.

3.2. Influence of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors

Some correlations between the wood mouse population density and climate variables with diversity, species richness and the kind of life cycles of the helminth community of the wood mouse were found in both areas (Table 9). In the burned area, the prevalence of FES cycles, ageohelminth and pseudogeohelminth nematode species were positively correlated with the number of rainy days, and the species richness with the mean temperature and the number of rainy days. The absence of correlations concerning the prevalence of no-FES cycles and the five diversity indices in the burned area stands out. In the control area, the prevalence of no-FES cycles was negatively correlated with the population density of the wood mouse and precipitation, while the prevalence of FES and geohelminth cycles were negatively correlated with minimum temperature. The fact that all correlations found in the control area were negative and the absence of correlations regarding ageohelminth and pseudogeohelminth nematodes as well as species richness and the five diversity indices is also noteworthy.
The models generated by BLR related to the influence of the period and year of capture, and sex and host age on the prevalence of the five types of cycles are shown in Table 10. In the burned area, the post-fire year of capture influenced the prevalence of nematodes with a geohelminth life cycle; the period of capture influenced the prevalence of helminths with an FES, no-FES, ageohelminth and pseudogeohelminth life cycle; the age of the wood mouse influenced the prevalence of helminths with a no-FES, pseudogeohelminth and geohelminth life cycle. In the control area, the post-fire year of capture influenced the prevalence of helminths with an FES, pseudogeohelminth and geohelminth life cycle; the period of capture influenced the prevalence of helminths with a no-FES and ageohelminth life cycle; the age of the wood mouse influenced the prevalence of helminths with a no-FES, pseudogeohelminth and geohelminth life cycle. The differences found between both areas show the stronger influence of the post-fire period on the helminth community of the burned area. Moreover, the sex of the wood mouse was not significantly related to any of the life cycles considered in the study in both areas.
The influence of these same intrinsic and extrinsic factors on the biodiversity of the helminth community in both areas is shown in Table 11. In the burned area, the post-fire year and the period of capture, as well as the host age, exercised an influence on the species richness and on the values of the Brillouin index; the post-fire year linked to the sex of the host on the species richness; the post-fire period linked to the sex of the host on the species richness and the values of the Brillouin index; the post-fire period linked to the age of the host on the species richness. In the control area, the post-fire year and the host age exercised an influence on the species richness and on the values of the Brillouin index; the post-fire period and the sex linked to the age of the host on the values of the Brillouin index. The influence of the site of capture shows that the species richness in the burned area is highly influenced by the post-fire period, while the values of the Brillouin index, although being different, are influenced by almost the same factors in both areas. Once again, there was no interaction between the sex of the wood mouse and the biodiversity of the helminth community in both areas.

4. Discussion

4.1. General Analysis

The helminth community of A. sylvaticus in Serra Calderona NP, after the helminthological analysis of a total of 917 individuals, is relatively similar to that previously reported in the entirety of the Iberian Peninsula [103]. Of the 28 species reported in that review, 14 of them have also been detected in Serra Calderona. Above all, the absence of trematodes with an aquatic life cycle, the terrestrial trematode Corrigia vitta, in spite of the presence of its two intermediate hosts, the nematodes Rictularia proni, Angiostrongylus dujardini and some capillarin species stands out. These absences can be explained through the limitation of resources in this Mediterranean enclave in comparison with the entirety of the Iberian Peninsula and, specifically, of some of the analysed enclaves that have a greater ecological diversity. However, the larval stages of the cestodes Taenia martis and Mesocestoides spp. were detected for the first time in this enclave as parasites of a murid species and of the wood mouse in the Iberian Peninsula, respectively [38].
In the burned area, the global prevalence of parasitation (88%) is still higher than in the control area (78%), as reported for previous regeneration periods of this enclave [14,16,17,67]. The presence of the cestodes H. straminea and G. arfaai in the burned area stands out, although the hymenolepidid was found at the beginning of the study and in two mice only, and the anoplocephalan was not detected until the 6th PFY.
The most prevalent and abundant species in the burned area, S. stroma, was reported as such during the 2nd–10th PFY period [17], although, during the 2nd–5th PFY period, S. frederici was the most abundant species [14]. In the control area, the highest H. polygyrus prevalence was reported during the 2nd–10th PFY period [17,67] and the 2nd–12th PFY period [16], while in the 2nd–5th PFY period [14] it was S. frederici. This last species was also the most abundant in the entire study period.

4.2. Life Cycles of Helminth

4.2.1. FES and no-FES Cycles

In both areas, the higher parasitation of helminth species with an FES cycle compared with those with a no-FES cycle was observed. The moderate climate and the absence of some invertebrates during some seasons enable the dominance of helminth species that do not depend on intermediate hosts, as corroborated by the observed higher annual fluctuation of the no-FES cycle helminths prevalence. Likewise, the higher global prevalence of parasitation observed in the burned area, with respect to the control area, is also related to a higher presence of both, helminth species with FES and those with no-FES cycles in the area in regeneration. Several studies on the wood mouse reported the same trend in other enclaves of the Iberian Peninsula [36,39,40,42]. Moreover, other studies carried out in Serra Calderona NP, corresponding to previous periods analysed, also showed similar results for the periods 2nd–5th, 2nd–10th and 2nd–12th PFY, respectively [14,16,17].
The positive influence of climate variables, such as the number of rainy days in the year before capture, on the FES cycles in the burned area as well as the negative influence of precipitation and the population density on the no-FES cycles in the control area do not seem to have a convincing explanation. In this sense, Arneberg suggested population density to be a poor indicator of the species richness of indirect life cycle parasites [104]. However, the negative influence of the minimum temperature of the previous year on the FES cycles in the control area could be an indicator of the negative influence of low temperatures on the free environmental stages.
The extrinsic factor post-fire period (PFP) and the intrinsic factor age are determinants of the no-FES cycles, both in the burned and in the control area, probably due to the seasonality of invertebrates and the diet of the wood mouse according to its age subpopulation.
The influence of the PFP on the FES cycles in the burned area, with respect to the influence of the PFY in the control area, is indicative of a strong influence of the season of capture in the area in regeneration. Moreover, between five and ten years after a wildfire, the differences found between the burned and the control areas with regard to the percentage of species with FES cycles, suggest that the changes in this variable may be related to the post-fire regeneration process [14,17]; the host aggregation, in this case in the burned area, favours the transmission of species with a simple life cycle, basically those most commonly transmitted in a direct manner [104,105].
On the other hand, the absence of important influences of the host population density on helminth species with an FES cycle in both areas stands out; being contrary to the conclusions reached concerning the central role population density plays in a positive manner in the likelihood of a helminth infective form (egg or larva) coming into contact with a host, which contrasts with what happens in the case of no-FES cycles [104,105].

4.2.2. Ageohelminth, Pseudogeohelminth and Geohelminth Cycles

Nematodes with an ageohelminth cycle (S. stroma and S. frederici) are, together, the most prevalent in both areas. This result is bound to be related to the ease with which transmission of these oxyurids, by means of direct contact between the host population and the habitat they share, occurs. However, the low prevalence observed during the first PFYs in the burned area could be due to the scarce wood mouse population at the beginning of the regeneration process. This hypothesis is corroborated by the fact that when the population density of the wood mouse increases in the burned area, the annual prevalence is generally higher than the global prevalence of the control area.
The fact that there were no clear correlations between climate variables and the host population density with prevalence is explicable by the usually high prevalence of oxyurids in both areas.
Pseudogeohelminths (T. muris, E. bacillatus and A. tetraptera) showed the lowest prevalence in both areas among the three types of monoxenous life cycles considered, likely to be due to the lower probability of coinciding with a viable embryonated egg in the shared space with respect to the other infective free environmental stages.
Although the embryonation of helminth eggs in the environment is known to be favoured by rainfall (more humid soil), the influence of this variable was detected in the burned area only, together with the influence of the PFP. This fact confirms, yet again, the higher vulnerability of the area in regeneration to the changes in the ecosystem along the seasonal periods. The burned area suffers the effects of climatic changes in a more profound manner as the ecosystem is in a permanent evolutionary process and is, therefore, more vulnerable to the climate conditions than the control area [15].
The influence, in both areas, of the host age might be related to the higher mobility of older A. sylvaticus individuals, increasing the exposure time and in turn the likelihood of being infected by a helminth [23], in this case ingesting an infective helminth egg.
The negative influence of certain environmental characteristics on H. polygyrus larvae, the only nematode with a geohelminth life cycle, is well known [27]. Among the factors with a negative influence are some climate variables and the diminishing pH of the soil [106], resulting in more extreme survival conditions for the larvae. However, the absence of correlation between the prevalence of H. polygyrus and climate variables or the host population density in the burned area is surprising. In the control area, a negative correlation between the prevalence and the minimum temperature reflects the direct influence of the temperature on the evolution of these free-living nematode larvae. In the burned area, factors other than climate-related ones, such as the loss of nutrients and the alkalinity of the soil as a consequence of the impact of the wildfire and the regeneration process, could exercise a more important influence, as reflected during the study of the 2nd–12th PFY period in which the importance of the NDVI vegetation index related to vegetal cover, which in turn depends on the pH of the soil and the presence of nutrients, was emphasized [16].
In both areas, the prevalence of geohelminths was influenced by the PFY and the host age. However, in other studies carried out previously on this post-fire regeneration process, the variability of the population of this geohelminth was observed, confirming the pronounced differences in favour of the control area during the more advanced regeneration periods [16].

4.3. Helminth Biodiversity

4.3.1. Mean Species Richness

The annual mean species richness in the burned area is usually above 3, with the mean global value also being higher than the value of the control area. The values obtained in the burned area are very similar to those reported in other studies on the wood mouse in the Iberian Peninsula [39,42], being slightly higher than those reported in the burned area of previous periods analysed [14,17]. However, the values in the burned area are higher than those obtained in other wood mouse studies such as a long-term study carried out during 26 years in England, which reported an overall mean species richness of only 1.01 [26].
Among the influences exercised by the climate on the species richness, the positive correlation of mean temperature and rainy days in the burned area only stands out. The logical and predictable influence of the host age on the species richness has also been reported in other peninsular enclaves, such as the Erro river valley [42] and Sierra Espuña [39], and in England [26], as well as in the burned area, but also in the control area in previous periods analysed in Serra Calderona NP, i.e., in the 2nd–10th PFY period [17].
However, although in both areas the species richness seems to be influenced by the PFY and the host age, the influence of the PFP was observed in the burned area only. These results reflect, therefore, that, 18 years after the wildfire, the burned area is still undergoing a regeneration process and presents a higher instability of the helminth community of A. sylvaticus due to extrinsic factors such as climatology and annual seasonality, which influence the infracommunities of the burned area but not those of the control area.

4.3.2. Helminth Diversity/Evenness—Brillouin Index

The generally low values of the specific diversity indices calculated, both the diversity/evenness and richness indices, indicate that there is a clear dominance of only a few helminth species belonging to the helminth community as a whole, in both areas. However, a higher richness and lower dominance in most of the analysed PFYs is observed in the burned area with respect to the control. Although some indices tend to be sensitive to the sample size, it is evident that the higher diversity of the wood mouse helminth community along the regeneration process in the burned area is less uniform than in the control area. It is important to note that during some of the sampling years, between the 5th and 17th PFY, the majority of the indices in the burned area were below those found in the control area. This is probably due to the higher incidence of the annual fluctuations in the burned area, as can be observed by the variation in Brillouin index values, the only index calculated at infracommunity level. Moreover, the nonexistence of significant differences between the PFY values of the diversity indices in both areas contrasts with the results obtained during the analysis of the 2nd–10th PFP [17]. The inclusion of eight more PFYs in the analysis could confirm the trend towards the similarity observed between both areas.
Surprisingly, the values of the diversity indices do not correlate with any of the climate variables or the population density of the wood mouse in either the burned or control areas. However, the interactions between the Brillouin index and the PFY and season could explain the annual fluctuations of its values. The relation of the wood mouse age with the Brillouin index values could be linked to the different diet and territorial behaviour of each subpopulation. Other studies carried out in the UK, Spain and Portugal reported a higher helminth diversity and species richness in the adult subpopulation [23,26,39,41]. This effect of the host age can be related to two facts: first, the increase in the host age goes together with the exposure to helminth infestations; second, the parasite burden accumulates along time [14,17,23,24,26,107,108].
The wood mouse population density could be responsible, among other factors, for the high prevalence values in the burned area, and the higher prevalence observed in this area with respect to the control area [105,109]. Moreover, the infracommunities, composed of up to nine species, are frequently larger than those of the control area, and those reported from other peninsular enclaves analysed, as well as those reported in previous studies carried out in Serra Calderona NP. These two characteristics of the helminth community of A. sylvaticus confirm the higher diversity of the area in regeneration.
The lower stability of the burned area goes together with a higher diversity of the helminth community, which may also be related to the post-fire succession in this Mediterranean forest ecosystem. The suppression of the host immune system may occur during this regeneration process as a result of the increase in helminth diversity, favouring the presence of concurrent species and, consequently, the increment in the species richness [17,110].

4.4. Biological Indicators

Previous studies carried out on the post-fire regeneration process in Serra Calderona NP [14,16,17] proposed certain aspects of the bioecology and the diversity of the helminth community of the wood mouse in the burned area as biological indicators of this process; some of which have been corroborated in the entirety of the 2nd–18th PFY period:
-
the higher influence of the climate as well as seasonality (PFP) in the burned area on the prevalence of FES and pseudogeohelminth cycles have been reaffirmed as biological indicators of the higher vulnerability of the post-fire regeneration area to periodical changes in the ecosystem.
-
Moreover, two other new biological indicators can be proposed:
-
the higher mean species richness, the higher value of indices of specific diversity, the higher global prevalence and the presence of infracommunities made up of more helminth species in the burned area are proposed as biological indicators of the higher richness and biodiversity of the area in post-fire regeneration, and
-
the influence of the PFP on the mean species richness and the annual fluctuations of the Brillouin index values in the burned area are proposed as biological indicators of the higher instability of the helminth community in areas in regeneration.

4.5. Limitations of the Study

The current research project on "the use of helminths of small mammals as biological indicators of the post-fire regeneration process in Mediterranean ecosystems", initiated almost three decades ago, had some limitations in its initial design due to the difficulties in obtaining the zoological material in the burned area of a natural park, considering both the great trapping effort needed as well as the obtention of dead animals to the helminthological study. Moreover, with the aim being to mitigate the low number of animals captured in the burned area, the two prospected areas affected by the wildfire (very close to each other and ecologically very similar) were considered throughout as a single burned area.
Furthermore, it should be taken into account that terrestrial ecosystems have, in general, not been as well studied as aquatic ones, in which the use of biological tags is much more common and analysed in depth, especially due to the difficulty of obtaining sufficient amounts of representative zoological material. This is one of the reasons why there are no previous hypotheses about the evolution in many terrestrial ecosystems, and that we are forced to talk, on many occasions, of trends and, therefore, more of biological indicators than biological tags.
Along the periods analysed (2nd–5th, 2nd–10th, 2nd–12th PFYs) the same extrinsic and intrinsic factors and dependent variables derived from the helminth community and the helminth component populations in both areas have been considered, providing new biological indicators and confirming, or not, those previously proposed, based, for example, on the differences concerning the behaviour of these helminth species and the population dynamics of the wood mouse in the burned area when compared to the control area. However, although this ecological analysis has been improved along the studied periods, including new statistical tests, and that, in our opinion, both the BLR and ANOVA showed their potential to follow the influence of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on the evolution/changes that have taken place in both areas, the inclusion of multivariate tests could lead to new findings that confirm the biological indicators of the post-fire regeneration process or even to the proposal of new ones. The analysis of new periods, currently in process, will incorporate the above-mentioned multivariate analysis.

5. Conclusions and Final Remarks

In general, 18 years after the wildfire that affected a large part of Serra Calderona NP, the post-fire regeneration process is still ongoing, as can be deduced from the majority of the results obtained and the biological indicators postulated.
The area in regeneration remains more vulnerable to seasonal and annual changes due to extrinsic factors such as climate conditions, vegetal recovery and sporadic but repetitive environmental impacts, mainly of anthropic nature.
The general comparative analysis between the burned and the control areas shows some differences, even after nearly two decades, such as:
-
the burned area still hosts a wood mouse helminth community with two further species, H. straminea and G. arfaai;
-
global prevalence as well as those of some helminth component populations in the burned area are still higher than those observed in the control area, although the trend towards their similarity seems to be accelerating;
-
considering the bioecological level of the helminth community, FES-type cycles are still more prevalent in the burned area;
-
the biodiversity, concerning species richness as well as helminth diversity, are still higher in the area in regeneration.
The observations and biological indicators that show the still existing differences between the two areas as a consequence of the post-fire regeneration process are directly related to some of the analysed factors, with the most outstanding being the climate variables related to the year and PFP before capture, among extrinsic factors and host age, and among intrinsic factors.
Once again, the important role that helminth parasites of the wood mouse play as biological indicators of the post-fire regeneration process in Mediterranean ecosystems has been demonstrated, making it possible to postulate that the analysis of the state of regeneration of these processes should take into account as a whole the aspects related to: the regeneration of the ecosystem, mainly concerning the succession and vegetation cover, the evolution and composition of the fauna, both invertebrates and vertebrates, and the climate conditions along the entire process; the host population analysed, the evolution of population dynamics and structure; the behaviour of the helminth community, the analysis of the annual evolution of the helminth component species and the influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on these.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.V.F., M.T.G.-P. and S.S.-D.; Methodology, M.V.F., M.T.G.-P., S.S.-D., Á.L.D. and S.S.-E.; Formal Analysis, S.S.-D., Á.L.D., S.S.-E. and M.S.-T.; Investigation, M.V.F., M.T.G.-P., S.S.-D., Á.L.D., S.S.-E. and M.S.-T.; Data Curation, S.S.-D., Á.L.D., S.S.-E. and M.S.-T.; Statistical Analysis, M.V.F., S.S.-D., Á.L.D. and S.S.-E.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, M.V.F., M.T.G.-P., S.S.-D., Á.L.D., S.S.-E. and M.S.-T.; Writing—Review and Editing, M.V.F., M.T.G.-P. and S.S.-D.; Project Administration, M.V.F.; Funding Acquisition, M.V.F., M.T.G.-P., S.S.-D. and S.S.-E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study has been supported by projects CGL2007- 61173/BOS and BOS 2000-0570-C02-02, Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología, PB87-0135 and PB92-0517-C02-01, Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Madrid, Spain; GV05/001, Conselleria d’Empresa, Universitat i Ciència, Generalitat Valenciana, Spain; UVAE 20060233 and UV97-2216 of the Universitat de València, Spain; CPE/073, Institució Valenciana d’Estudis i Investigació, València, Spain. S. Sainz-Elipe received a personal postgraduate scholarship from the Fundació La Caixa, Barcelona, Spain.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Permissions and protocols to capture, manipulate and study helminthologically the wood mouse in the study area were provided by the regional government (Generalitat Valenciana), specifically from the departments responsible for biodiversity and wildlife: Department of Natural Environment Preservation (Document Reference 352/94, for the period 1994–1998), Department of Sustainable Development (Document Reference, 50/99 for the period 1999–2003), Department of Planning and Management of the Environment (Document Reference 2003/11028 for the period 2004–2007), Department of Management of the Natural Environment (Document Reference: 2008-14223 for 2008; 2009-3835 for 2009; 2009-49266 for 2010). Dead individuals were used for the helminthological study. However, between the period from the 2nd to the 5th PFY only, fewer than 10% of specimens captured alive (i.e., less than 25) were euthanized by exposure to CO2-saturated atmosphere; this practice was carried out more than one decade before the Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes was published.

Acknowledgments

We would also like to thank the Conselleria de Medi Ambient de la Generalitat Valenciana, València (Spain) for permission to carry out field studies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Biocca, E.; Khalil, L.F. Parasites as biological tags. In Reviews of Advances in Parasitology. Proceedings of the IV International Congress of Parasitology, ICOPA IV, Warszawa, Poland, 19–26 August 1978; Slusarski, W., Ed.; Polish Scientific Publishers: Warszawa, Poland, 1981; pp. 873–879. [Google Scholar]
  2. MacKenzie, K. Fish parasites as biological tags. Scott. Fish. Bull. 1982, 47, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  3. MacKenzie, K. Parasites as biological tags in fish population studies. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 1983, 7, 251–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Williams, H.H.; MacKenzie, K.; McCarthy, A.M. Parasites as biological indicators of the population biology, migrations, diet, and phylogenetics of fish. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 1992, 2, 144–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Spratt, D.M. Helminth communities in small mammals in southeastern New South Wales. Int. J. Parasitol. 1987, 17, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Galán-Puchades, M.T.; Fuentes, M.V. Parasites and fire. Parasitol. Today 1996, 12, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Marcogliese, D.J.; Cone, D.K. On the distribution and abundance of eel parasites in Nova Scotia: Influence of pH. J. Parasitol. 1996, 82, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lafferty, K.D. Environmental parasitology: What can parasites tell us about human impacts on the environment? Parasitol. Today 1997, 13, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Galán-Puchades, M.T.; Fuentes, M.V.; Cerezuela, A.M.; Fons, R.; Mas-Coma, S. Host/parasite postfire responses: The helminths of Apodemus sylvaticus (Rodentia, Muridae) as bioindicators of its movements after fire. Misc. Zool. 1998, 21, 35–43. [Google Scholar]
  10. Galán-Puchades, M.T.; Fuentes, M.V.; Cerezuela, A.M.; Fons, R.; Mas-Coma, S. A proposed methodology for the use of helminth parasites as biological tags in the study of postfire ecosystem regeneration processes. Vie Milieu 1999, 49, 45–50. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lafferty, K.D.; Kuris, A.M. How environmental stress affects the impacts of parasites. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1999, 44, 925–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Mosquera, J.; de Castro, M.; Gómez-Gesteira, M. Parasites as biological tags of fish populations: Advantages and limitations. Comments Theor. Biol. 2003, 8, 69–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fuentes, M.V.; Sainz-Elipe, S.; Galán-Puchades, M.T. The helminth community of the common shrew in a post-fire regenerated Mediterranean ecosistem. Helminthologia 2005, 42, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Fuentes, M.V.; Sainz-Elipe, S.; Galán-Puchades, M.T. Ecological study of the wood mouse helminth community in a burned Mediterranean ecosystem in regeneration five years after a wildfire. Acta Parasitol. 2007, 52, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fuentes, M.V.; Sainz-Elipe, S.; Galán-Puchades, M.T. Geographic information systems as a new tool and methodology proposed for modelling mammal/helminth postfire regeneration. The example of Parc Natural de la Serra Calderona (Comunitat Valenciana, Spain). Res. Rev. Parasitol. 2007, 67, 9–14. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fuentes, M.V.; Sainz-Elipe, S.; Sáez-Durán, S.; Galán-Puchades, M.T. Helminth parasites of small mammals as biological indicators of the post-fire regeneration process in Mediterranean ecosystems and preliminary small mammal/helminth GIS models. Rev. Ibero-Latinoam. Parasitol. 2009, 1, 46–55. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fuentes, M.; Sainz-Elipe, S.; Sáez-Durán, S.; Galán-Puchades, M. The helminth community of the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus in a Mediterranean ecosystem in regeneration ten years after a wildfire. J. Helminthol. 2010, 84, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sainz-Elipe, S.; Galán-Puchades, M.T.; Fuentes, M.V. The helminth community of the Mediterranean mouse, Mus spretus, in a post-fire regenerated Mediterranean ecosystem. Helminthologia 2007, 44, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Marcogliese, D.J. Parasites of the superorganism: Are they indicators of ecosystem health? Int. J. Parasitol. 2005, 35, 705–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kisielewska, K. Ecological organization of intestinal helminth groupings in Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreb.) (Rodentia). I. Structure and seasonal dynamics of helminth groupings in a host population in the Bialowieża National park. Acta Parasitol. Pol. 1970, 18, 121–147. [Google Scholar]
  21. Haukisalmi, V.; Henttonen, H.; Tenora, F. Population dynamics of common and rare helminths in cyclic vole populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 1988, 57, 807–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Haukisalmi, V.; Henttonen, H. Variability of helminth assemblages and populations in the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus. Pol. J. Ecol. 2000, 48, 219–231. [Google Scholar]
  23. Behnke, J.M.; Lewis, J.W.; Mohd Zain, S.N.; Gilbert, F.S. Helminth infections in Apodemus sylvaticus in southern England: Interactive effects of host age, sex and year on the prevalence and abundance of infections. J. Helminthol. 1999, 73, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Behnke, J.M.; Gilbert, F.S.; Abu-Madi, M.A.; Lewis, J.W. Do the helminth parasites of wood mice interact? J. Anim. Ecol. 2005, 74, 982–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Behnke, J.M.; Bajer, A.; Behnke-Borowczyk, J.; Clisham, N.; Gilbert, F.; Glover, A.; Jeffery, L.; Kirk, J.; Mierzejewska, E.J.; Mills, S.C.; et al. Long-term spatiotemporal stability and dynamic changes in helminth infracommunities of spiny mice (Acomys dimidiatus) in St. Katherine’s Protectorate, Sinai, Egypt. Parasitology 2019, 146, 50–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Behnke, J.M.; Rogan, M.T.; Craig, P.S.; Jackson, J.A.; Hide, G. Long-term trends in helminth infections of wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) from the vicinity of Malham Tarn in North Yorkshire, England. Parasitology 2021, 148, 451–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Abu-Madi, M.; Behnke, J.M.; Lewis, J.W.; Gilbert, F.S. Seasonal and site specific variation in the component community structure of intestinal helminths in Apodemus sylvaticus from three contrasting habitats in south-east England. J. Helminthol. 2000, 74, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Milazzo, C.; Aloise, G.; Cagnin, M.; Di Bella, C.; Geraci, F.; Feliu, C.; Casanova, J.C. Helminths of Apodemus sylvaticus (Muridae) distributed on the Southern European border (Italian Peninsula). Vie Milieu 2005, 55, 45–51. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ondríková, J.; Miklisová, D.; Ribas, A.; Stanko, M. The helminth parasites of two sympatric species of the genus Apodemus (Rodentia, Muridae) from south-eastern Slovakia. Acta Parasitol. 2010, 55, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Loxton, K.C.; Lawton, C.; Stafford, P.; Holland, C.V. Parasite dynamics in an invaded ecosystem: Helminth communities of native wood mice are impacted by the invasive bank vole. Parasitology 2017, 144, 1476–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Čabrilo, B.; Jovanović, V.M.; Bjelić Čabrilo, O.; Budinski, I.; Blagojević, J.; Vujošević, M. Is there a host sex bias in intestinal nematode parasitism of the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis) at Obedska bara pond, Serbia? Helminthologia 2018, 55, 247–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Mas-Coma, S.; Feliu, C. Helminthfauna from small mammals (insectivores and rodents) on the Pityusic Islands. In Biogeography and Ecology of the Pityusic Islands; Kuhbier, H., Alcover, J.A., Guerau d’Arellano Tur, C., Eds.; Dr. W. Junk Publishers: The Hague, The Netherlands, 1984; pp. 469–525. [Google Scholar]
  33. Goüy de Bellocq, J.; Morand, S.; Feliu, C. Patterns of parasite species richness of Western Palaeartic micro-mammals: Island effects. Ecography 2002, 25, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Goüy de Bellocq, J.; Sarà, M.; Casanova, J.C.; Feliu, C.; Morand, S. A comparison of the structure of helminth communities in the woodmouse, Apodemus sylvaticus, on islands of the western Mediterranean and continental Europe. Parasitol. Res. 2003, 90, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Portolés, E.; Granell, P.; Esteban, J.G. Helminthofaunistic analysis of Apodemus sylvaticus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Rodentia: Muridae) from the Albufera Natural Park (Valencia, Spain). Res. Rev. Parasitol. 2000, 60, 17–23. [Google Scholar]
  36. Fuentes, M.V.; Sáez, S.; Trelis, M.; Cruz, J.; Sarmento, P.E.; Casanova, J.C.; Torres, J.; Feliu, C.; Esteban, J.G. Helminthfauna of small mammals (Insectivora, Rodentia) collected in the Serra da Malcata (Portugal). Res. Rev. Parasitol. 2003, 63, 89–92. [Google Scholar]
  37. Torres, J.; Trelis, M.; Espert, A.; Ribas, A.; Toledo, R.; Casanova, J.C.; Roman, J.; Arrizabalaga, A.; Esteban, J.G.; Feliu, C. Helminth fauna of small mammals (insectivores and rodents) in Doñana (southeastern Iberian Peninsula). Rev. Ibér. Parasitol. 2003, 63, 23–29. [Google Scholar]
  38. Fuentes, M.V.; Cerezuela, A.M.; Galán-Puchades, M.T. A helminthological survey of small mammals (insectivores and rodents) in the Serra Calderona mountains (Valencian Community, Spain). Res. Rev. Parasitol. 2000, 60, 25–35. [Google Scholar]
  39. Fuentes, M.; Sáez, S.; Trelis, M.; Galán-Puchades, M.; Esteban, J. The helminth community of the wood mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus, in the Sierra Espuña, Murcia, Spain. J. Helminthol. 2004, 78, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fuentes, M.V.; Sáez, S.; Trelis, M.; Muñoz-Antolí, C.; Esteban, J.G. The helminth community of Apodemus sylvaticus (Rodentia, Muridae) in the Sierra de Gredos (Spain). Arx. Misc. Zool. 2004, 2, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Eira, C.; Torres, J.; Vingada, J.; Miquel, J. Ecological aspects influencing the helminth community of the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus in Dunas de Mira, Portugal. Acta Parasitol. 2006, 51, 300–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Debenedetti, A.L.; Sainz-Elipe, S.; Sáez-Durán, S.; Galicia, D.; Imaz, A.; Galán-Puchades, M.T.; Fuentes, M.V. The helminth community of the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus from the Erro River valley, Navarre, Spain. J. Helminthol. 2015, 89, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Anderson, R.M. The regulation of host population growth by parasitic species. Parasitology 1978, 76, 119–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Anderson, R. Depression of host population abundance by direct life cycle macroparasites. J. Theor. Biol. 1980, 82, 283–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Anderson, R.M.; May, R.M. Regulation and stability of host-parasite population interactions: I. Regulatory Processes. J. Anim. Ecol. 1978, 47, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Anderson, R.; May, R.M. Population biology of infectious diseases: Part I. Nature 1979, 280, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. May, R.M.; Anderson, R.M. Regulation and stability of host-parasite population interactions: II. Destabilizing processes. J. Anim. Ecol. 1978, 47, 249–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. May, R.M.; Anderson, R. Population biology of infectious diseases: Part II. Nature 1979, 280, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Trabaud, L. Man and fire: Impacts on Mediterranean vegetation. In Mediterranean-Type Shrublands; Di Castri, F., Goodall, W., Specht, R.L., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1981; pp. 523–537. [Google Scholar]
  50. Terrades, J. Terrestrial Ecosystems: Response to Wildfires and other Perturbations; Quaderns d’Ecologia Aplicada, 10; Servei del Medi Ambient; Diputació de Barcelona: Barcelona, Spain, 1987. (In Catalan) [Google Scholar]
  51. Terrades, J. Fire Ecology; Edicions Proa: Barcelona, Spain, 1996. (In Catalan) [Google Scholar]
  52. Lloret, F. Fire and regeneration regime. In Ecology of the Mediterranean Forest in a Changing World; Valladares, F., Ed.; Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, EGRAF, S.A.: Madrid, Spain, 2004; pp. 101–126. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  53. Fuentes, M.V.; Galán-Puchades, M.T.; Cerezuela, A.M. Insectivores and rodents of the Serra Calderona (Valencian Community). Dynamics of recolonization and post-fire helminthological study. Galemys 1998, 10, 37–58. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  54. Pardini, G.; Pintó, J. Fire, Landscape and Biodiversity: An Appraisal of the Effects and Effectiveness: Lectures from the 3rd International Summer School on the Environment; Universitat de Girona: Girona, Spain, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  55. Prodon, R.; Fons, R.; Peter, A.M. The impact of fire on vegetation, birds and micromammals in the Mediterranean formations of the Pyrenees Orientales: First results. Rev. Ecol. 1985, 39, 129–158. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  56. Prodon, R.; Fons, R.; Athias-Binche, F. The impact of fire on animal communities in Mediterranean area. In The Role of Fire in Ecological System; Trabaud, L., Ed.; SPB Academic Publishing: The Hague, The Netherlands, 1987; pp. 121–157. [Google Scholar]
  57. Fons, R.; Grabulosa, I.; Saint-Girons, M.C.; Galán-Puchades, M.T.; Feliu, C. Fire and cicatrization of Mediterranean ecosystems. Repopulation dynamics in small mammals. Vie Milieu 1988, 38, 259–280. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  58. Fons, R.; Grabulosa, I.; Feliu, C.; Mas-Coma, S.; Galán-Puchades, M.T.; Comes, A.M. Postfire Dynamics of a Small Mammal Community in a Mediterranean Forest (Quercus suber). In Fire in Mediterranean Ecosystems; Trabaud, L., Prodon, R., Eds.; Commission of the European Communities: Brussels, Belgium, 1993; pp. 259–270. [Google Scholar]
  59. Arrizabalaga, A.; Montagud, E.; Fons, R. Post-fire succession in small mammal communities in the Montserrat Massif (Catalonia, Spain). In Fire in Mediterranean Ecosystems; Trabaud, L., Prodon, R., Eds.; Commission of the European Communities: Brussels, Belgium, 1993; pp. 281–291. [Google Scholar]
  60. Haim, A. Resilience to fire of rodents in an east-Mediterranean pine forest on Mount Carmel, Israel: The effects of different managements. In Fire in Mediterranean Ecosystems; Trabaud, L., Prodon, R., Eds.; Commission of the European Communities: Brussels, Belgium, 1993; pp. 293–301. [Google Scholar]
  61. Arrizabalaga, A.; Llimona, F. Effects of fire on wildlife and wildlife recovery after fire. In Fire Ecology; Terrades, J., Ed.; Edicions Proa: Barcelona, Spain, 1996; pp. 173–188. (In Catalan) [Google Scholar]
  62. Fuentes, M.V.; Galán-Puchades, M.T. The recolonization of small mammals in burned areas and their role as bioindicators of post-fire regeneration. The case of the Serra Calderona: First data and contributions. In Second Congress of County Studies; Institut d’Estudis Comarcals del Camp de Túria: València, Spain, 1994; pp. 104–113. (In Catalan) [Google Scholar]
  63. Torre, I.; Díaz, M. Small mammal abundance in Mediterranean post-fire habitats: A role for predators? Acta Oecologica 2004, 25, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Galán-Puchades, M.T.; Mas-Coma, S.; Fuentes, M.V.; Jiménez, A.M.; Fons, R. Dynamics of the Helminth parasitic community dynamics of the wood mouse populations, Apodemus sylvaticus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Rodentia: Muridae) in ecosystems disturbed by the wildfire. In “In Memoriam” to Profesor Doctor D.F. de P. Martínez Gómez; Hernández, S., Ed.; Servicio de Publicaciones Universidad de Córdoba: Córdoba, Spain, 1992; pp. 467–480. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  65. Feliu, C.; Fons, R.; Mas-Coma, S.; Galán-Puchades, M.T.; Fuentes, M.V.; Blasco, S.; Grabulosa, I. The helminth parasites as markers on the dynamics of micromammals recolonisation after fire. In Fire in Mediterranean Ecosystems; Trabaud, L., Prodon, R., Eds.; Commission of the European Communities: Brussels, Belgium, 1993; pp. 271–279. [Google Scholar]
  66. Torre, I.; Arrizabalaga, A.; Feliu, C.; Ribas, A. The helminth infracommunities of the wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) two years after the fire in Mediterranean forests. Helminthologia 2013, 50, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Sáez-Durán, S.; Debenedetti, Á.L.; Sainz-Elipe, S.; Galán-Puchades, M.T.; Fuentes, M.V. The helminth community component species of the wood mouse as biological tags of a ten post-fire-year regeneration process in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Parasitol. Res. 2018, 117, 2217–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Pérez-Cueva, A.J. Climatic Atlas of the Valencian Community; Conselleria d’Obres Públiques, Urbanisme i Transports: València, Spain, 1994. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  69. Costa, M. The Vegetation of the Valencian Country; Publicacions Universitat de València: València, Spain, 1986. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  70. García-Fayos, P. The silicic vegetation of the Serra Calderona (Comunitat Valenciana). Lazaroa 1991, 12, 317–332. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  71. Sainz-Elipe, S.; Sáez-Durán, S.; Galán-Puchades, M.T.; Fuentes, M.V. Small mammal (Soricomorpha and Rodentia) dynamics after a wildfire in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Mammalia 2012, 76, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mas-Coma, S.; Valero, A.; Montoliu, I. Methodology of morphometric study of intraespecific variability in Digenean of the family Brachylaimidae Joyeux et Foley, 1930. Bull. Soc. Neuchâtel. Sci. Nat. 1984, 107, 185–195. (In French) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hunkeler, P. Cestodes parasites of small mammals (rodents and insectivores) of Ivory Coast and Upper Volta. Rev. Suisse de Zool. 1973, 80, 809–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wahl, E. Parasito-ecological study of small mammals (insectivores and rodents) in the Allondon Valley (Geneva). Rev. Suisse Zool. 1967, 74, 129–188. (In French) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Murai, E.; Tenora, F. Some Taeniid species (Cestoidea) parasitizing vertebrates (Rodentia, Carnivora, Strigiformes) in Hungary. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 1973, 19, 125–132. [Google Scholar]
  76. Vaucher, C. The parasitic cestodes of European Soricidae. Anatomical study, taxonomic review and biology. Rev. Suisse Zool. 1971, 78, 1–113. (In French) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tenora, F.; Mas-Coma, S.; Murai, E.; Feliu, C. The system of cestodes of the suborder Catenotaeniata spassky, 1963. Parasitol. Hung. 1980, 13, 39–57. [Google Scholar]
  78. Quentin, J.C. Family Catenotaeniidae Spasskii, 1950. In Keys to the Cestode Parasite of Vertebrates; Khalil, L.F., Jones, A., Bray, R.A., Eds.; CAB International, University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1994; pp. 367–374. [Google Scholar]
  79. Baer, J.G.; Tenora, F. Some species of Hymenolepis (Cestoidea) from rodents and from primates. Acta Sci. Nat. Brno 1970, 4, 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  80. Tenora, F.; Mas-Coma, S. Records of Gallegoides arfaai (Mobedi et Ghadirian, 1977) n. comb. (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae) in Apodemus sylvaticus L. from Western Europe. Proposition of Gallegoides nov. gen. Säugetierkd. Mitt. 1978, 40, 222–226. [Google Scholar]
  81. Roman, E. Ecological and morphological study on parasitic acanthocephalans and nematodes of rats in the Lyon region county. Mem. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. 1951, 2, 49–270. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  82. Bernard, J. Studies on the parasitic fauna of Tunisia. I. Parasitic nematodes of Muridae. Arch. Inst. Pasteur Tunis 1963, 40, 5–64. (In French) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  83. Moravec, F. Proposal of a new systematic arrangement of nematodes of the family Capillariidae. Folia Parasitol. 1982, 29, 119–132. [Google Scholar]
  84. Tenora, F.; Zavadil, R. A contribution to the evaluation of capillariid nematodes found in rodents in Czechoslovakia. Acta Univ. Agric. 1967, 15, 357–368. [Google Scholar]
  85. Tenora, F. The helminthfauna of small rodents of the Rohacská Dolina Valley (Liptovské Hole Mts., Slovakia). Acta Sci. Nat. Acad. Brno 1967, 1, 29–68. [Google Scholar]
  86. Durette-Desset, M.C. Cuticular ridge systems in heligmosome nematodes. III. Study of seven parasitic species of Nearctic rodents and reestablishment of the genus Heligmosomoides Hall, 1916. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. 1968, 40, 186–209. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  87. Bernard, J. Some species of micromammal helminths collected in France and Spain. Vie Milieu 1961, 2, 125–149. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  88. Quentin, J.C. Comparative morphology of the cephalic and genital structures of pinworms of the genus Syphacia. Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Comp. 1971, 46, 15–60. (In French) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Tenora, F.; Meszaros, F. Nematodes of the genus Syphacia Seurat, 1916 (Nematoda), parasites of rodents (Rodentia) in Czechoslovakia and Hungary. Acta Univ. Agric. 1975, 23, 537–554. [Google Scholar]
  90. Hall, M.C. Nematode parasites of mammals of the orders Rodentia, Lagomorpha, and Hyracoidea. Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus. 1916, 50, 1–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Hugot, J.P. On the genus Aspiculuris Schulz, 1924 (Nematoda, Heteroxynematidae), parasitic pinworms of rodents Muroidea. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. 1980, 3, 723–735. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  92. Wertheim, G. A study of Mastophorus muris (Gmelin, 1790) (Nematoda: Spiruridae). Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 1962, 81, 274–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Quentin, J.C. Larval morphogenesis of the spirurid Mastophorus muris (Gmelin, 1790). Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Comp. 1970, 45, 839–855. (In French) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Bush, A.O.; Lafferty, K.D.; Lotz, J.M.; Shostak, A.W. Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. Revisited. J. Parasitol. 1997, 83, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sokal, R.R.; Rohlf, F.J. Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 2nd ed.; W.H. Freeman and Co: New York, NY, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  96. Fuentes, M.V.; Sainz-Elipe, S.; Galán-Puchades, M.T. Comparative analysis of the helminth community of the common shrew, Crocidura russula, of three western Mediterranean enclaves and the inland of the Iberian Peninsula. Res. Rev. Parasitol. 2005, 65, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  97. Pielou, E.C. Ecological Diversity; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  98. Magurran, A.E. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement; Princeton University Press: London, UK, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  99. Simpson, E. Measurement of Diversity. Nature 1949, 163, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Berger, W.H.; Parker, F.L. Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments. Science 1970, 168, 1345–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. May, R.M. Patterns of species abundance and diversity. In Ecology and Evolution Communities; Cody, M.L., Diamond, J.M., Eds.; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1975; pp. 81–120. [Google Scholar]
  102. Pielou, E.C. An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  103. Feliu, C.; Renaud, F.; Catzeflis, F.; Hugot, J.-P.; Durand, P.; Morand, S. A comparative analysis of parasite species richness of Iberian rodents. Parasitology 1997, 115, 453–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Arneberg, P. An ecological law and its macroecological consequences as revealed by studies of relationships between host densities and parasite prevalence. Ecography 2001, 24, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Arneberg, P.; Skorping, A.; Grenfell, B.; Read, A.F. Host densities as determinants of abundance in parasite communities. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1998, 265, 1283–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Abu-Madi, M.A.; Behnke, J.M.; Lewis, J.W.; Gilbert, F.S. Descriptive epidemiology of Heligmosomoides polygyrus in Apodemus sylvaticus from three contrasting habitats in south-east England. J. Helminthol. 1998, 72, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Gregory, R.D. On the interpretation of host-parasite ecology: Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematoda) in wild wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) populations. J. Zool. 1992, 226, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Morand, S. Wormy world: Comparative tests of theoretical hypotheses on parasite species richness. In Evolutionary Biology of Host-Parasite Relationships: Theory Meets Reality; Poulin, R., Morand, S., Skorping, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 63–79. [Google Scholar]
  109. Montgomery, S.S.J.; Montgomery, W.I. Spatial and temporal variation in the infracommunity structure of helminths of Apodemus sylvaticus (Rodentia: Muridae). Parasitology 1989, 98, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Krasnov, B.R.; Poulin, R.; Morand, S. Patterns of macroparasite diversity in small mammals. In Micromammals and Macroparasites; Springer: Tokio, Japan, 2006; pp. 197–231. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Study area: (a) location of Valencian Country in the Western Mediterranean frame; (b) location of Serra Calderona Natural Park in the Valencian Country; (c) Landsat 5 TM image of February 1994 (courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey) showing the location of the three trapping sites in the burned (S—La Saladilla; R—Rebalsadors) and in the control (L—Les Llomes) areas in Serra Calderona Natural Park (blue outline) and in its special protection area (white outline).
Figure 1. Study area: (a) location of Valencian Country in the Western Mediterranean frame; (b) location of Serra Calderona Natural Park in the Valencian Country; (c) Landsat 5 TM image of February 1994 (courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey) showing the location of the three trapping sites in the burned (S—La Saladilla; R—Rebalsadors) and in the control (L—Les Llomes) areas in Serra Calderona Natural Park (blue outline) and in its special protection area (white outline).
Animals 11 02926 g001
Figure 2. Orthophoto (courtesy of the Valencian Cartographic Institute) of the trapping site of La Saladilla (burned area) and some photographs showing its evolution during the post-fire regeneration process (W = Winter; Sp = Spring; Sm = Summer).
Figure 2. Orthophoto (courtesy of the Valencian Cartographic Institute) of the trapping site of La Saladilla (burned area) and some photographs showing its evolution during the post-fire regeneration process (W = Winter; Sp = Spring; Sm = Summer).
Animals 11 02926 g002
Figure 3. Orthophoto (courtesy of the Valencian Cartographic Institute) of the trapping site of Rebalsadors (burned area) and some photographs showing its evolution during the post-fire regeneration process (W = Winter; Sp = Spring; Sm = Summer).
Figure 3. Orthophoto (courtesy of the Valencian Cartographic Institute) of the trapping site of Rebalsadors (burned area) and some photographs showing its evolution during the post-fire regeneration process (W = Winter; Sp = Spring; Sm = Summer).
Animals 11 02926 g003
Figure 4. Orthophoto (courtesy of the Valencian Cartographic Institute) of the trapping site of Les Llomes (control area) and some seasonal photographs taken during the study period.
Figure 4. Orthophoto (courtesy of the Valencian Cartographic Institute) of the trapping site of Les Llomes (control area) and some seasonal photographs taken during the study period.
Animals 11 02926 g004
Figure 5. Some snapshots showing the most common tasks during surveys: trap preparation (a), camera trapping (b), temperature and rainfall measurement (c), captures (d), handling and marking of small mammals captured (e).
Figure 5. Some snapshots showing the most common tasks during surveys: trap preparation (a), camera trapping (b), temperature and rainfall measurement (c), captures (d), handling and marking of small mammals captured (e).
Animals 11 02926 g005
Figure 6. Microscopy photographs of some helminths found in the wood mice analysed. From left to right: 1st line, Syphacia frederici females, Taenia parva metacestode, anterior part of Eucoleus bacillatus, Pseudocatenotaenia matovi scolices; 2nd line, Mastophorus muris female, Taenia parva scolex section, caudal end of Trichruis muris male, Gallegoides arfaai strobila; 3rd line, Brachylaima sp. adult, Heligmosomoides polygyrus female and male, Taenia martis metacestode, anterior end of Syphacia frederici female; 4th line, eggs in the uterus of an Aonchotheca annulosa female, Gallegoides arfaai and Catenotaeniidae Gen. sp. scolices, anterior end of Aspiculuris tetraptera female, Trichuris muris females.
Figure 6. Microscopy photographs of some helminths found in the wood mice analysed. From left to right: 1st line, Syphacia frederici females, Taenia parva metacestode, anterior part of Eucoleus bacillatus, Pseudocatenotaenia matovi scolices; 2nd line, Mastophorus muris female, Taenia parva scolex section, caudal end of Trichruis muris male, Gallegoides arfaai strobila; 3rd line, Brachylaima sp. adult, Heligmosomoides polygyrus female and male, Taenia martis metacestode, anterior end of Syphacia frederici female; 4th line, eggs in the uterus of an Aonchotheca annulosa female, Gallegoides arfaai and Catenotaeniidae Gen. sp. scolices, anterior end of Aspiculuris tetraptera female, Trichuris muris females.
Animals 11 02926 g006
Figure 7. Frequency of occurrence of the number of helminth species present in the infracommunities of the wood mouse in the burned and control areas.
Figure 7. Frequency of occurrence of the number of helminth species present in the infracommunities of the wood mouse in the burned and control areas.
Animals 11 02926 g007
Table 1. Number of wood mice analysed and number of individuals captured per 100 trap-nights by post-fire year (PFY) in the burned (B) and control (C) areas.
Table 1. Number of wood mice analysed and number of individuals captured per 100 trap-nights by post-fire year (PFY) in the burned (B) and control (C) areas.
n° of A. sylvaticus AnalysedA. sylvaticus Captured per 100
Trap-Nights
PFYBCBC
Second21112.201.82
Third19271.642.55
Fourth61811.192.39
Fifth511913.225.30
Sixth1075016.0013.09
Seventh531117.889.09
Eighth26118.944.85
Ninth1788.185.00
Tenth531116.215.15
Eleventh492535.6825.45
Twelfth171219.7416.82
Thirteenth15412.7312.42
Fourteenth33718.188.79
Fifteenth29310.453.64
Sixteenth39920.9111.52
Seventeenth401415.6116.06
Eighteenth451218.648.18
Table 2. Distribution of wood mice analysed by host age and sex and season of capture in the burned (B) and control (C) areas.
Table 2. Distribution of wood mice analysed by host age and sex and season of capture in the burned (B) and control (C) areas.
Host Age
JuvenilesSub-AdultsAdultsTotal
Host SexSeasonBCBCBCBC
MalesAutumn002132094112
Winter171910221632318263
Spring111511938710027
Summer4022743216928
TOTAL32201965016460392130
FemalesAutumn20138421910
Winter25206524411713161
Spring10452252028231
Summer913181115110
TOTAL4625161657622283112
Table 3. Annual average of climate variables included in the study: temperature in °C, minimum (minT), medium (medT) and maximum (maxT); accumulated precipitation (accP) in tenths of mm; and rainy days (Rd); by post-fire year (PFY) in the burned (B) and the control (C) areas; data not recorded by the climate stations considered (nr).
Table 3. Annual average of climate variables included in the study: temperature in °C, minimum (minT), medium (medT) and maximum (maxT); accumulated precipitation (accP) in tenths of mm; and rainy days (Rd); by post-fire year (PFY) in the burned (B) and the control (C) areas; data not recorded by the climate stations considered (nr).
minTmedTmaxTaccPRd
PFYBCBCBCBCBC
1st9.99.815.916.021.922.23791472571109
2nd10.610.116.716.622.723.1371539875398
3rd11.310.216.816.622.323.02523252456100
4th11.110.316.416.521.822.65086626288134
5th10.710.315.716.521.622.74700490184126
6th10.510.815.617.120.723.33292377465116
7th10.010.615.717.021.423.3341036795193
8th11.010.316.916.622.922.9237025374892
9th10.311.616.617.522.523.46068681452107
10th9.610.713.816.420.222.16280616721117
11thnrnr17.417.1nrnr5532446793111
12thnrnr16.916.4nrnr53737542105134
13thnrnr16.615.7nrnr362130207399
14thnrnr17.216.3nrnr498054768999
15th5.97.217.318.229.428.4469849297381
16th5.47.216.417.828.428.6507454776862
17th6.27.416.517.428.328.3559859516759
18th5.67.216.617.629.129.7451640258361
Table 4. Selected characteristics of the helminth community of 917 wood mice analysed from Serra Calderona Natural Park.
Table 4. Selected characteristics of the helminth community of 917 wood mice analysed from Serra Calderona Natural Park.
Helminth SpeciesSiteMonox.Heterox.FESNo-FESOther Characteristics
TREMATODA
Brachylaima spp.SI X XInfective form in a terrestrial snail
CESTODA
Taenia parva larvaeBC XX Wood mice act as intermediate host
Taenia martis larvaeBC XX Wood mice act as intermediate host
Mesocestoides spp. larvaeBC X XWood mice act as 2nd intermediate host
Pseudocatenotaenia matoviSI X XInfective form in a terrestrial arthropod
Skrjabinotaenia lobataSI X XInfective form in a terrestrial arthropod
Catenotaeniidae Gen. spp.SI X XInfective form in a terrestrial arthropod
Hymenolepis stramineaSI X XInfective form in a terrestrial arthropod
Gallegoides arfaaiSI X XInfective form in a terrestrial arthropod
NEMATODA
Trichuris murisCX X pseudogeohelminth
Eucoleus bacillatusSWX X pseudogeohelminth
Aonchotheca annulosaSI X XInfective form in a terrestrial invertebrate
Heligmosomoides polygyrusSIX X geohelminth
Syphacia stromaSIX X ageohelminth
Syphacia fredericiLI/CX X ageohelminth
Aspiculuris tetrapteraSIX X pseudogeohelminth
Mastophorus murisS X XInfective form in a terrestrial arthropod
Nematoda Gen. spp. larvaeSI X??Stray parasitism/mice as paratenic host
SI, small intestine; BC, body cavity; C, caecum; SW, stomach wall; LI, large intestine; Monox., monoxenous or direct life cycle; Heterox., heteroxenous or indirect life cycle.
Table 5. Characterization of the helminth community of the wood mouse in the burned (n = 675) and control (n = 242) areas. CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error. FES, helminths which have a free-environmental infectious stage for the wood mouse.
Table 5. Characterization of the helminth community of the wood mouse in the burned (n = 675) and control (n = 242) areas. CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error. FES, helminths which have a free-environmental infectious stage for the wood mouse.
Helminth SpeciesPrevalence
(95%CI)
Mean Abundance
(SE)
Median Intensity
(Range)
BurnedControlBurnedControlBurnedControl
Brachylaima spp.3 (2–5)0. 5 (0–1)0.13 (0.05)0.004 (0.004)4.30 (1–20)1.00 (1)
Taenia parva larvae6 (4–8)8 (5–12)0.08 (0.01)0.16 (0.04)1.24 (1–3)1.95 (1–6)
Taenia martis larvae3 (2–5)3 (1–6)0.04 (0.01)0.04 (0.02)1.26 (1–3)1.25 (1–3)
Mesocestoides spp. larvae1 (0.4–2)0.5 (0–1)0.26 (0.20)0.21 (0.21)25.29 (3–136)52.00 (52)
Pseudocatenotaenia matovi7 (5–9)10 (7–14)0.27 (0.08)0.25 (0.08)3.68 (1–33)2.61 (1–15)
Skrjabinotaenia lobata11 (9–14)4 (2–7)0.71 (0.16)0.07 (0.03)6.22 (1–83)1.80 (1–5)
Catenotaeniidae Gen. spp.5 (4–7)4 (2–7)0.34 (0.13)0.09 (0.03)6.24 (1–82)2.10 (1–5)
Hymenolepis straminea0.5 (0–1)0.01 (0.005)-2.0 (1–3)
Gallegoides arfaai7 (5–9)0.11 (0.02)-1.65 (1–4)
Trichuris muris21 (18–24)7 (4–11)0.51 (0.05)0.14 (0.07)2.37 (1–16)2.06 (1–16)
Eucoleus bacillatus16 (14–19)8 (5–12)1.17 (0.30)0.25 (0.07)7.42 (1–171)3.21 (1–9)
Aonchotheca annulosa25 (22–28)11 (7–16)3.95 (0.82)0.58 (0.18)15.98 (1–291)5.38 (1–27)
Heligmosomoides polygyrus13 (11–16)36 (30–42)1.00 (0.28)2.45 (0.45)7.70 (1–113)6.82 (1–65)
Syphacia stroma51 (47–55)20 (15–26)50.95 (6.37)6.82 (1.77)99.10 (1–1937)34.38 (1–212)
Syphacia frederici20 (17–23)28 (23–34)26.06 (6.05)28.94 (12.07)122.44 (1–2646)104.54 (1–2846)
Aspiculuris tetraptera2 (1–3)3 (1–6)0.13 (0.07)0.69 (0.63)7.42 (1–41)23.86 (1–52)
Mastophorus muris11 (9–14)17 (13–22)0.36 (0.07)0.35 (0.08)3.23 (1–35)2.00 (1–14)
Nematoda Gen. spp. larvae0.1 (0–0.5)0.5 (0–1)0.002 (0.002)0.004 (0.004)1.00 (1)1.00 (1)
Table 6. Total prevalence (P) of the five types of life cycles in the wood mouse, and parameters of statistically significant differences between them, in the burned (B) and control (C) areas.
Table 6. Total prevalence (P) of the five types of life cycles in the wood mouse, and parameters of statistically significant differences between them, in the burned (B) and control (C) areas.
Type of Life CyclesBurnedControl
nP (%)nP (%)χ2P
FES54080.0016266.9416.203<0.0001
No-FES32347.858635.5410.4410.0012
Ageohelminths44666.0710242.1541.415<0.0001
Pseudogeohelminths24336.003414.0539.678<0.0001
Geogeohelminths8813.048735.9559.092<0.0001
FES, helminths which have a free-environmental infectious stage for the wood mouse.
Table 7. Diversity characteristics of the helminth community of the wood mouse in the burned and control areas.
Table 7. Diversity characteristics of the helminth community of the wood mouse in the burned and control areas.
Diversity/Uniformity IndexBurnedControl
Shannon index1.111.05
Simpson index0.550.47
Berger–Parker index0.390.30
Shannon evenness index0.380.38
Table 8. Biodiversity characteristics of the helminth community of the wood mouse in the burned and control areas.
Table 8. Biodiversity characteristics of the helminth community of the wood mouse in the burned and control areas.
Biodiversity Characteristics BurnedControl
Mean species richnessX2.031.60
SE0.060.09
Brillouin indexX0.230.18
SE0.010.02
Max.3.741.39
BI infected A.s. onlyX0.260.23
SE0.020.02
% of A.s. infected 87.7077.69
Table 9. Values of correlations between the prevalence of the different kinds of life cycles and values of species richness and the Brillouin index with climate data and host population density (values of the year prior to capture) by means of the Spearman correlation coefficient (Rho) and the associated P values in parentheses.
Table 9. Values of correlations between the prevalence of the different kinds of life cycles and values of species richness and the Brillouin index with climate data and host population density (values of the year prior to capture) by means of the Spearman correlation coefficient (Rho) and the associated P values in parentheses.
Host DensityMin. Temp.Mean Temp.PrecipitationRainy Days
BioecologyBurnedControlBurnedControlBurnedControlBurnedControlBurnedControl
FES---−0.564
(0.045)
----0.709
(0.001)
-
No-FES-−0.626
(0.009)
-----−0.691
(0.002)
--
Ageohelminths--------0.499
(0.041)
-
Pseudogeohelminths--------0.581
(0.014)
-
Geohelminths---−0.805
(0.001)
------
Biodiversity
Species richness----0.517
(0.034)
---0.486
(0.048)
-
FES, helminths which have a free-environmental infectious stage for the wood mouse.
Table 10. Logistic regression models for prevalence of the five types of life cycles by year and period of capture, host age and host sex, in the burned and control areas, expressed by χ2 values with associated probabilities (P) for the model created including independent variables. df = degree of freedom.
Table 10. Logistic regression models for prevalence of the five types of life cycles by year and period of capture, host age and host sex, in the burned and control areas, expressed by χ2 values with associated probabilities (P) for the model created including independent variables. df = degree of freedom.
BurnedControl
Independent Variables in the Modeldfχ2Pχ2P
FES
Post-fire period34101.5020.0001--
Post-fire year16--58.8790.0001
no-FES
Post-fire period/Host age36168.8320.000187.9330.0001
Ageohelminths
Post-fire period34133.3810.000186.2770.0001
Pseudogeohelminths
Post-fire period/Host age36205.8730.0001--
Post-fire year/Host age18--58.8660.0001
Geohelminths
Post-fire year/Host age1894.5490.0001115.9670.0001
FES, helminths which have a free-environmental infectious stage for the wood mouse.
Table 11. ANOVA models for values of species richness and the Brillouin index of the wood mouse by year and period of capture, host age and host sex, in the burned and control areas, expressed by F values with associated probabilities (P) for the model created including independent variables. df = degree of freedom.
Table 11. ANOVA models for values of species richness and the Brillouin index of the wood mouse by year and period of capture, host age and host sex, in the burned and control areas, expressed by F values with associated probabilities (P) for the model created including independent variables. df = degree of freedom.
Burned Control
Independent Variables in the ModeldfFPFP
Species richness
Post-fire year165.0600.00012.9240.0001
Host age223.7050.00016.7910.002
Post-fire period302.8050.0001--
Year of capture/Host sex161.6870.046--
Post-fire period/Host sex222.2900.001--
Post-fire period/Host age311.5070.042--
Brillouin index
Post-fire year161.7490.0.0352.4490.003
Host age212.9720.00018.5070.0001
Post-fire period302.0820.0011.8730.014
Host sex/Host age2--3.3900.037
Post-fire period/Host sex221.5750.048--
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sáez-Durán, S.; Debenedetti, Á.L.; Sainz-Elipe, S.; Sabater-Tena, M.; Galán-Puchades, M.T.; Fuentes, M.V. Ecological Analysis of the Helminth Community of the Wood Mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus, along an 18-Year Post-Fire Regeneration Period in a Mediterranean Ecosystem. Animals 2021, 11, 2926. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102926

AMA Style

Sáez-Durán S, Debenedetti ÁL, Sainz-Elipe S, Sabater-Tena M, Galán-Puchades MT, Fuentes MV. Ecological Analysis of the Helminth Community of the Wood Mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus, along an 18-Year Post-Fire Regeneration Period in a Mediterranean Ecosystem. Animals. 2021; 11(10):2926. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102926

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sáez-Durán, Sandra, Ángela L. Debenedetti, Sandra Sainz-Elipe, Mireia Sabater-Tena, María Teresa Galán-Puchades, and Màrius Vicent Fuentes. 2021. "Ecological Analysis of the Helminth Community of the Wood Mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus, along an 18-Year Post-Fire Regeneration Period in a Mediterranean Ecosystem" Animals 11, no. 10: 2926. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102926

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop