Next Article in Journal
Asymptomatic Bacteriuria (ABU) in Elderly: Prevalence, Virulence, Phylogeny, Antibiotic Resistance and Complement C3 in Urine
Next Article in Special Issue
Requirement of the LtsA Protein for Formation of the Mycolic Acid-Containing Layer on the Cell Surface of Corynebacterium glutamicum
Previous Article in Journal
Pigment Production Improvement in Rhodotorula mucilaginosa AJB01 Using Design of Experiments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Current Evidence for Corynebacterium on the Ocular Surface
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 9
Issue 2
10.3390/microorganisms9020389
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ribonuclease J-Mediated mRNA Turnover Modulates Cell Shape, Metabolism and Virulence in Corynebacterium diphtheriae

by
Truc Thanh Luong
1,2,†,
Minh Tan Nguyen
1,3,†,
Yi-Wei Chen
1,†,
Chungyu Chang
1,
Ju Huck Lee
2,4,
Manuel Wittchen
5,
HyLam Ton-That
6,
Melissa Cruz
2,
Danielle A. Garsin
2,
Asis Das
7,*,
Andreas Tauch
5 and
Hung Ton-That
1,8,*
1
Division of Oral Biology & Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
2
Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
3
NTT Hi-Tech Institute, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam
4
Biological Resource Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Jeollabuk-do 56212, Korea
5
Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
6
Department of Chemistry, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA 92617, USA
7
Neag Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, USA
8
Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Equal Contribution.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(2), 389; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020389
Submission received: 4 January 2021 / Revised: 8 February 2021 / Accepted: 9 February 2021 / Published: 14 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics and Physiology of Corynebacteria)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Controlled RNA degradation is a crucial process in bacterial cell biology for maintaining proper transcriptome homeostasis and adaptation to changing environments. mRNA turnover in many Gram-positive bacteria involves a specialized ribonuclease called RNase J (RnJ). To date, however, nothing is known about this process in the diphtheria-causative pathogen Corynebacterium diphtheriae, nor is known the identity of this ribonuclease in this organism. Here, we report that C. diphtheriae DIP1463 encodes a predicted RnJ homolog, comprised of a conserved N-terminal β-lactamase domain, followed by β-CASP and C-terminal domains. A recombinant protein encompassing the β-lactamase domain alone displays 5′-exoribonuclease activity, which is abolished by alanine-substitution of the conserved catalytic residues His186 and His188. Intriguingly, deletion of DIP1463/rnj in C. diphtheriae reduces bacterial growth and generates cell shape abnormality with markedly augmented cell width. Comparative RNA-seq analysis revealed that RnJ controls a large regulon encoding many factors predicted to be involved in biosynthesis, regulation, transport, and iron acquisition. One upregulated gene in the ∆rnj mutant is ftsH, coding for a membrane protease (FtsH) involved in cell division, whose overexpression in the wild-type strain also caused cell-width augmentation. Critically, the ∆rnj mutant is severely attenuated in virulence in a Caenorhabditis elegans model of infection, while the FtsH-overexpressing and toxin-less strains exhibit full virulence as the wild-type strain. Evidently, RNase J is a key ribonuclease in C. diphtheriae that post-transcriptionally influences the expression of numerous factors vital to corynebacterial cell physiology and virulence. Our findings have significant implications for basic biological processes and mechanisms of corynebacterial pathogenesis.

1. Introduction

Messenger RNA (mRNA) turnover is crucial in recycling nucleotides and controlling gene expression that permit bacteria to adapt with environmental changes [1,2,3,4]. RNase E, RNase III, and RNase Y are major endonucleases known to be involved in bacterial mRNA processing; these enzymes typically harbor a catalytic domain and an RNA-binding domain [5]. As an essential enzyme in Escherichia coli [6], the endonuclease RNase E is part of the multiprotein RNA degradosome complex that also contains PNPase (a 3′-5′ exonuclease), RhlB (DEAD-box family helicase), and enolase [7]. Through its endoribonucleolytic activity, RNase E cleaves polyribosomal mRNAs into small fragments, which are then further degraded into nucleotides by exoribonucleases, such as PNPase, RNase II, and RNase R [8]. The accessory factors RhlB and poly(A) polymerase (PAP) facilitate exoribonucleolytic activity [8]. Importantly, in bacterial species that lack RNase E, including the Gram-positive Firmicutes Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis [9], RNase Y is the functional equivalent of RNase E that was shown to interact with the degradosome partners in vivo [10].
Bacillus subtilis possesses two functional homologs of E. coli RNase E, named RNases J1 and J2, initially characterized as endoribonucleases [11] and implicated in global mRNA degradation [11,12]. Intriguingly, Bacillus RNases J1 and J2 form a complex that exhibits 5′-to-3′ exoribonuclease activity [13]. Another Firmicute having RNases J1 and J2 is Streptococcus pyogenes (GAS); unlike B. subtilis, both streptococcal RNases are essential for bacterial growth, suggesting non-redundancy of these enzymes in GAS [14]. In Enterococcus faecalis, a leading cause of nosocomial infections, only RNase J2 homolog has been reported; deletion of rnjB, coding for RNase J2, resulted in reduced transcript levels of pilus genes, which correlates with decreased biofilm formation by the mutant bacteria [15]. Significantly, the Enterococcus rnjB mutant is more sensitive to bile salt, as compared to the parental strain, and the mutant is greatly attenuated in organ colonization in an experimental model of infection [16]. In Streptococcus mutans, deletion of genes coding for RNases J1 and J2 causes defects in growth, morphology, acid tolerance, natural competence, and biofilm formation [17], and the two RNases were shown to interact with each other [18]. Like the Firmicutes phylum of Gram-positive bacteria, Actinobacteria also possess homologs of RNase J [19]. For instance, Streptomyces coelicolor encodes RNase J, a high-resolution crystal structure of which was determined [20]. S. coelicolor RNase J forms a homo-tetramer with each protomer comprised of a β-lactamase domain and β-CASP domain, followed by another β-lactamase domain and a C-terminal domain [20]. In Streptomyces venezuelae, deletion of rnj leads to cell growth and morphology defects [21]. Both rnj mutants in S. coelicolor and S. venezuelae are also defective in antibiotic production [21,22]. These reports suggest that actinobacterial RNase J may be broadly involved in mRNA degradation. Yet, to date whether RNase J is involved in modulating virulence in actinobacterial pathogens, such as Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, has not been addressed.
The Gram-positive actinobacterium C. diphtheriae is the causative agent of diphtheria, a life-threatening disease caused by a highly potent exotoxin named diphtheria toxin (DT) [23], which is comprised of a catalytic domain A and a host cell transfer-mediating domain B [24]. Though DT is encoded by the tox gene within corynebacteriophage β [25], expression of tox is regulated by the iron-activated transcriptional repressor DtxR encoded by the bacterial host C. diphtheriae [26,27]. Under high-iron conditions, DtxR becomes activated, and it binds to the promoter region of tox, repressing tox expression; in contrast, when iron is limiting, as within the upper respiratory tract of human host, repression of tox by DtxR is relieved, leading to high expression of DT [28]. Importantly, in addition to tox, DtxR regulates expression of genes involved in iron and heme transport and siderophore biosynthesis [29,30]. While DT is a major virulence factor of C. diphtheriae, pilus adhesins also play a critical role in pathogenesis. The C. diphtheriae type strain NCTC 13,129 encodes three types of heterotrimeric pili, classified by their major subunits, i.e., SpaA-, SpaD-, and SpaH-type [31,32,33]. Importantly, in rodent and Caenorhabditis elegans models of infection, pilus-less mutants are significantly attenuated [34,35].
We report here functional studies of an uncharacterized protein (DIP1463) in C. diphtheriae, predicted to be RNase J (RnJ). By biochemical methods, we demonstrate that the C. diphtheriae putative RNase J possesses 5′-3′ exoribonuclease activity confined at the N-terminal β-lactamase domain. Significantly, we show that a mutant devoid of rnj is defective in cell growth and morphology in culture and also in bacterial virulence in a nematode model of infection. RNA-seq analysis revealed that C. diphtheriae RNase J regulates a large number of transcripts, many of which encode factors involved in bacterial iron acquisition, biosynthesis, and pilus assembly. Thus, RNase J is a major ribonuclease that influences bacterial physiology and virulence in C. diphtheriae. Further genetic and biochemical evidence that the diphtheria toxin itself is dispensable for full corynebacterial virulence in the nematode model revealed that the defective virulence of the rnj mutant is due to misexpression of some factors other than DT, the nature and mechanisms of which remain to be elucidated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, Media, and Cell Growth

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S2. C. diphtheriae was grown in Heart Infusion (HI) Broth (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) or on HI agar plates at 30 °C. E. coli strains were grown in Luria–Bertani (LB) broth or on LB agar at 37 °C. When necessary, kanamycin (Kan) was added to cultures at 25 μg mL−1; ampicillin (Amp) was used at 50 µg mL−1 or 100 µg mL−1.
To examine cell growth, overnight cultures of C. diphtheriae strains were used to inoculate fresh cultures with starting OD600 of ~0.1. Bacterial growth was monitored every hour at OD600 using Ultrospec 7000 (GE Healthcare, Boston, MA, USA). Results are presented as average of 3 independent experiments performed in duplicate.

2.2. Generation of Gene Deletion Mutants in C. diphtheriae

An in-frame, nonpolar deletion mutant of rnj was generated according to published protocols [31,36]. Briefly, 1-kb fragments upstream and downstream of rnj were PCR-amplified using appropriate primers (Table S3) and cloned into the vector pK19mobsacB at EcoRI and BamHI sites. The resulting plasmid was introduced into E. coli S17-1, and the cloned fragments were verified by DNA sequencing. E. coli S17-1 harboring the deletion plasmid was used for bacterial conjugation with C. diphtheriae NCTC13129. Integration of the plasmid into the corynebacterial chromosome was selected with Kan. Selected integrates were grown overnight at 30 °C without antibiotics to induce double-crossover homologous recombination leading to plasmid excision and generating wild-type and mutant alleles. Mutant alleles were selected by colony PCR. The generated rnj mutant, together with E. coli S17-1 harboring a dtxR deletion plasmid [37], was used to create a double mutant lacking both rnj and dtxR (Table S2).

2.3. Recombinant Plasmids

pRnJ—The primer pair pRnJ-SalI/pRnJ-BamHI (Table S3) was used to amplify a DNA fragment containing the rnj promoter and rnj coding sequence using genomic DNA of C. diphtheriae strain NCTC 13,129 as a template. The generated PCR product was gel-purified, digested with SalI-HF and BamHI-HF (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA), and subsequently ligated into pCGL0243 [38] precut with SalI and BamHI. The resulting plasmid was introduced into E. coli DH5α and plasmid DNA was isolated for PCR, restriction enzymes incubation, and sequencing to confirm the cloned sequence. Finally, the plasmid was electroporated into the C. diphtheriae ∆rnj mutant.
pFtsH—The primer pairs pFtsH-HindIII-A/pFtsH-B and pFtsH-C/pFtsH-BamHI-D (Table S3) were used to PCR-amplify the spaA promoter region and the ftsH coding sequence, respectively, using genomic DNA of strain NCTC 13129 as a template. Subsequently, overlapping PCR was employed to link the promoter region to the coding sequence, using both PCR products as templates and primers pFtsH-HindIII-A and pFtsH-BamHI-D, according to a published protocol [39]. The generated PCR product was gel-purified, digested with HindIII-HF and BamHI-HF (NEB), and subsequently ligated into pCGL0243. The resulting plasmid was introduced into E. coli DH5α, and plasmid DNA was isolated for confirmation by DNA sequencing. Finally, the plasmid was electroporated into the C. diphtheriae strain NCTC 13129.
pMCSG-RnJ981 and derivatives—An N-terminal region of RnJ encompassing the β-lactamase domain (residues 1-327) was cloned into the expression vector pMCSG7 according to a published ligation-independent cloning method [40]. Briefly, a pair of primers LIC-RnJ981-F/LIC-RnJ981-R (Table S3) was used to amplify the first 981 nucleotides of rnj from genomic DNA of strain NCTC 13129. The amplicon was ligated into pMCSG7 in a step-down annealing reaction, and the resulting plasmid (pMCSG-RnJ981) was introduced into E. coli DH5α. Successful clones were confirmed by DNA sequencing before introducing into E. coli SHuffle cells for protein expression.
To generate alanine-substitution RnJ mutants at His residues 186 and 188, a site-directed mutagenesis method was employed [40] using pairs of phosphorylated primers LIC-H186A-F/LIC-H186A-R and LIC-H188A-F/LIC-H188A-R (Table S3) and pMCSG-RnJ981 as a template. Resulting linear PCR products were ligated with T4 ligase (NEB) at 16 °C for 18 h before transforming into E. coli DH5α. The mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing. The generated recombinant plasmids were introduced into E. coli SHuffle cells for protein expression.

2.4. Protein Purification

Purification of recombinant RnJ proteins was followed according to a published protocol [40]. Briefly, overnight cultures of E. coli SHuffle cells harboring pMCSG-RnJ981 or its derivatives were used to inoculate fresh cultures, which were grown at 37 °C with shaking until OD600 of ~0.8. Protein expression was induced at 30 °C for 6 h with 1 mM of isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Cells were harvested by centrifugation and lysed by French press, and clear lysates were obtained for affinity chromatography using nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) beads. Purified proteins were desalted, concentrated, and stored at −80 °C until further experiments.

2.5. RT-FeDEx Assay

To determine 5′-exoribonuclease activity, a RT-FexEX assay was performed as previously described [41]. RNA1 and DNA1 (Table S3) synthesized by Integrated DNA Technology (CA, USA) were hybridized, and the duplex (500 nM) was added to reaction buffer (30 mM Tris-Cl pH 8.0, 2 mM MgCl2, 50 mM NH4Cl, 0.5 mM DTT, 20 µg/mL acetylated bovine serum) containing purified RnJ proteins (100 nM). Exoribonuclease activity was monitored by a T100 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad) at absorbance/emission wavelengths of 494/520 nm, respectively, for 15 h. The experiments were repeated twice in triplicates. The presented graph is representative of an experiment with 30 min intervals, prepared by GraphPad Prism 5.0 (La Jolla, CA, USA).

2.6. RNA-Seq Analysis

RNA of C. diphtheriae wild-type and ∆rnj strains was prepared using RNeasy Mini Kits and RNase-free DNase Sets according to the manufacture’s protocol (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). Briefly, cell pellets harvested from 3 mL log-phase cultures were suspended into 200 μL of chilled 10 mM RNA-free Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. The suspension was added to a fast-protein tube (Q BIOgene, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 700 μL RLT buffer (RNeasy Mini Kit, Qiagen), and cells were lysed using a Ribolyser (Hybaid, Cambride, UK). After centrifugation at 13,000× g, RNA was purified from the supernatants accordingly. Purified RNA was treated by DNase (Qiagen) and subsequently cleaned by an RNeasy clean up kit (Qiagen). RNA quality was determined by an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) with an Agilent RNA Pico 6000 kit. RNA samples with the RNA integrity number (RIN) values of >8.0 were stored at −80 °C prior to RNA-seq analysis. Three biological replicates of each strain were used for statistical significance.
For RNA-Seq, cDNA libraries were prepared as previously described [37] for each of the biological replicates, and sequencing was performed in the paired-end mode on an Illumina MiSeq. Processing and mapping of the paired-end reads and differential gene expression analysis was performed as previously reported [37]. Genes with an adjusted p-value < 0.05 and log2 (fold change) above +1.0 or below −1.0, respectively, were considered to be differentially transcribed under the examined conditions. The RNA-seq data have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database with the accession number of GSE165533.

2.7. Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reactions

cDNA was prepared from one microgram of pure RNA according to the manufacture’s instruction (NEB) with random primers and Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus reverse transcriptase (NEB) using a T100 Thermalcycler (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). Reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCRs) were performed using a 2.0X Taq RED Master Mix Kit (Genesse Scientific, San Diego, CA, USA) with cDNA as a template and probes for 23S RNA and rnj (Table S3).
With cDNA prepared above, real-time qPCR was performed accordingly [39], using iTAQ SYBR green supermix (Bio-Rad) and a T100 Thermalcycler (Bio-Rad). The coding sequence of 23S RNA of C. diphtheriae was used as a control. Primers for qRT-PCR are shown in Table S3. Results were analyzed by GraphPad Prism 5.0 (La Jolla, CA, USA).

2.8. Detection of Diphtheria Toxin

DT expression and detection were performed according to a published protocol [34]. Briefly, overnight cultures of wild-type and rnj mutant strains were used to inoculate fresh cultures with starting OD600 of ~0.1. When OD600 reached 0.3 at 30 °C, bacterial cultures were treated with 1 mM ethylenediamine-N,N’-bis(2-hydroxyphenylacetic acid) (EDDA; Sigma) for 12 h to induce DT expression. Supernatants were collected for protein precipitation and protein concentration was determined using a BCA Protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Protein samples were boiled in sample buffer containing 1% SDS prior to SDS-PAGE with 3–20% Tris-glycine gradient gels. DT was detected by immunoblotting with monoclonal antibodies (1:2000, α-DT).

2.9. Electron Microscopy

Log-phase cells of C. diphtheriae strains were harvested and subject to electron microscopy as previously described [39]. Briefly, cells immobilized on grids were washed five times with distilled water and stained with 1% uranyl acetate for 1 min prior to viewing by a JEOL JEM-1400 electron microscope.
Electron micrographs above were used to measure cell width and length by ImageJ (NIH). For each dimension, 50 individual cells were analyzed. The results were expressed as average with standard deviations as error bars.

2.10. Chrome Azurol S (CAS) Assay

Detection of secreted siderophore was performed by a previously published protocol [42] with some modifications. Briefly, corynebacterial cells grown overnight in HI broth at 30 °C were washed in a semi-defined low-iron medium (mPGT) and resuspended in fresh mPGT supplemented with or without 10 μM FeCl3 to inoculate new cultures with a starting OD600 of 0.05. After 20 h of growing at 30 °C, supernatants obtained by centrifugation were used in a colorimetric assay with chrome azurol S (CAS) to estimate siderophore production according to a published procedure [43]. In brief, obtained supernatants were mixed with CAS solution (3:1 ratio) and incubated at room temperature for 3 h, and absorbance at 630 nm of the resulting solutions were measured using a microplate reader (Tecan M1000). Data from three independent experiments performed in triplicates were expressed as mean with standard deviations. Siderophore production (SP) was estimated by the following equation: SP = (Ar − As) × 100/Ar, where Ar is absorbance of reference (CAS solution and un-inoculated broth) and As is absorbance of sample (CAS solution and culture supernatant).

2.11. Caenorhabditis Elegans Killing Assay

C. elegans strain N2 was maintained on nematode growth (NG) agar plates containing a bacterial lawn of E. coli OP50. Killing assays were performed as previously described [35,44,45], with some modifications. BHI agar plates, supplemented with 25 μg ml−1 nalidixic acid and 50 μg ml−1 5-fluoro-2-deoxyuridine (FuDR), were used to grow C. diphtheriae from overnight cultures. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Next, L4-stage nematodes were transferred to BHI plates containing C. diphtheriae strains and incubated at 25 °C for the remainder of the experiment. Dead nematodes were recorded and removed every 24 h. For each corynebacterial strain, ∼30 nematodes were used, and the assays were repeated at least three times. The Kaplan–Meier method was used for survival analysis, and all statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 5.0 (La Jolla, CA, USA), with p-values <0.05 considered significant. LT50, the time required to kill 50% of nematodes, was determined for each bacterial strain.

2.12. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (La Jolla, CA, USA), with significant difference calculated using the unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. Results were presented as the average of three independent experiments ± standard deviation (SD). A nonparametric, two-tailed value of p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), or p < 0.001 (***) was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. C. Diphtheriae Encodes Ribonuclease J

The predicted ribonuclease J homolog (RnJ) in C. diphtheriae NCTC 13,129 genome, DIP1463, is part of a transcriptional unit [37], comprised of DIP1463 and DIP1464 (coding for a 4-hydroxy-tetrahydrodipicolinate synthase and involved in L-lysine biosynthesis) (Figure 1A). Similar to the Bacillus RNase J enzymes, the corynebacterial RnJ is predicted to harbor an N-terminal β-lactamase domain, with the conserved catalytic histidine residues His186 and His188, followed by the β-CASP domain and a C-terminal extension domain (Figure 1B). To examine if corynebacterial RnJ possesses ribonuclease activity, we cloned an RnJ protein, encompassing the β-lactamase domain (residues 1–327) (Figure 1B), in E. coli using the expression vector pMCSG7 that appends a hexa-histidine tag to the C-terminus of a cloned protein [40]. Mutant proteins with Ala-substitution mutants of His186 and His188 were also generated. All recombinant proteins were expressed in and purified from E. coli by Ni2+ affinity chromatography to homogeneity (see Figure 1D).
Next, we used the purified proteins in a real-time fluorescence detection and assay of exoribonucleases (RT-FeDEx) with an RNA1/DNA1 duplex as a substrate, as previously reported [41]. In this assay, an RNA molecule linked to the fluorophore carboxy-fluorescein (F) at the 3′ end (RNA1) was hybridized to a DNA oligonucleotide containing the quencher carboxytetramethylrhodamine (Q) at the 5′ end (DNA1) (Figure 1C). Incubation of the RNA1/DNA1 duplex with the wild-type RnJ enzyme led to a rapid release of the fluorophore, hence fluorescence over time, whereas no significant increase in the fluorescent signal was visible in the reactions with the two His-to-Ala substitution mutants or lysozyme as control (Figure 1E). Thus, like its counterpart from Bacillus, C. diphtheriae DIP1463 possesses 5′-3′ exoribonuclease activity that requires the conserved His186 and His188 catalytic residues; hereafter, we named DIP1463 as ribonuclease RnJ.

3.2. Genetic Disruption of rnj Alters Cell Growth and Morphology

To determine the biological role of RnJ, we constructed an in-frame, nonpolar deletion mutant of rnj (∆rnj) by a convenient allele-exchange procedure (see Section 2). Using oligonucleotide primers specific for rnj (Figure 2A), the generated ∆rnj mutant was confirmed by reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR (Figure 2B). To examine whether rnj deletion has any effects on cell growth, the mutant and parental strains were inoculated from overnight cultures, and cell growth over time was monitored by optical density at 600 nm (OD600). Compared to the parental strain (WT), the ∆rnj mutant displayed a slow growth rate, which was rescued by ectopic expression of rnj from a plasmid (Figure 2C). Whereas the doubling time of parental cells was typically 59.03 ± 5.29 min, that of the ∆rnj mutant was nearly twice as long (96.65 ± 5.29 min).
We next examined whether the slow growth defect was associated with any alteration in cell morphology using electron microscopy. Corynebacterial cells grown to log-phase were immobilized on nickel grids and stained with 1% uranyl acetate prior to viewing by an electron microscope. Intriguingly, ∆rnj mutant cells appeared wider than the parental cells (Figure 2; compare 2D with 2E). This augmentation of cell width was abated when rnj was ectopically expressed in the ∆rnj mutant (Figure 2G). To quantitatively determine the cell dimension, we employed ImageJ (NIH), measuring cell length and width of 50 cells from electron micrographs taken from parental and mutant cells. As shown in Table 1, the parental cells had an average width and length of 0.64 and 1.26 µm, respectively. The width of the ∆rnj mutant increased to 0.99 µm, while its length was similar to that of the parental strain. Prompted by our transcriptomic analysis revealing that corynebacteria devoid of rnj contain a higher level of transcripts for the cell division protein FtsH (see below), we examined whether this alteration might contribute to altered cell envelope morphology. Indeed, overexpression of FtsH in the parental strain also caused cell width augmentation, whereas the cell length was comparable to the parental cells (Figure 2F and Table 1). Collectively, these results demonstrate that genetic disruption of rnj in C. diphtheriae causes cell growth and morphology defects and suggest that the slow growth of the mutant might be linked to an aberrant expansion of the cell envelope width, possibly due to the elevated expression of a morphogen.

3.3. Transcriptome Analysis of the rnj Mutant

In order to decipher how the deletion of RnJ alters cell morphology and decelerates cell growth, we employed RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to compare global gene expression between the WT and ∆rnj mutant strains. Total bacterial RNA was extracted from three independent cultivations of the wild-type and ∆rnj mutant strains at mid-logarithmic growth phase and subjected to RNA-seq using Illumina MiSeq. Using a 2-fold cutoff (log2-fold change of ±1), 230 genes were found upregulated (Figure 3A; green dots), while only 157 genes were downregulated by rnj deletion (Figure 3A; red dots) (Table S1). Among the differentially regulated genes, a large number of genes (139) encoded proteins with unknown functions, while 115 genes coded for proteins related to metabolism (amino acids, nucleotides, carbohydrates, coenzymes, lipids, and inorganic ions), and 55 genes coded for proteins predictably involved in replication, transcription, and translation, (Figure 3C). Interestingly, five pilus-associated genes (coding for sortases SrtA, SrtB, and SrtC, and pilins SpaE and SpaF) were also upregulated (Table S1). The remaining differentially regulated genes encoded transcriptional regulators, phage proteins, transposases, chaperones, and many others. The most upregulated were genes related to tryptophan biosynthesis (8–10-fold increase) (Figure 3A; green circles). In contrast, DIP0491–coding for L-asparaginase– and sdaA (L-serine dehydratase encoding gene) were among the most highly downregulated genes. To confirm differential gene expression, we isolated total RNA from the parental and ∆rnj mutant strains for qRT-PCR using probes specific for some of the genes listed in Table 2. Figure 3D shows that the expression of ciuE, encoding a siderophore-biosynthesis protein [29], was increased by 2-fold, whereas the expression of irp6A, encoding a siderophore transporter [29], was decreased nearly 4-fold in the ∆rnj mutant. All pilus-associated genes were upregulated in this mutant as expected (Figure 3D).
Intriguingly, ftsH was upregulated (log2-fold change of +1.26) in the rnj mutant. The ftsH gene was originally identified in E. coli through the isolation of a temperature sensitive cell division mutant, which had elongated cells [46]. In B. subtilis, deletion of ftsH also resulted in filamentous growth [47]. These findings led us to hypothesize that ftsH might be associated with cell division in C. diphtheriae. To test this, we engineered a recombinant multi-copy vector expressing ftsH under the control of a strong promoter and introduced the resulting plasmid into the wild-type strain. Cell morphology was then analyzed by electron microscopy. As shown in Figure 2F, this strain displayed a phenotype similar to the ∆rnj mutant, i.e., augmentation of cell width (see also Table 1), suggesting that the altered cell morphology observed in the ∆rnj mutant might be caused by the increased expression of ftsH in this mutant.
Taken together, the results support that the RnJ ribonuclease modulates a large number of transcripts in the human pathogen C. diphtheriae, which are involved in cell metabolism, fitness, and morphology.

3.4. Reduction of Secreted Diphtheria Toxin in the ∆rnJ Mutant

The major virulence factor of C. diphtheriae is the exotoxin diphtheria toxin (DT) encoded by a prophage, i.e., the corynephage β [23,35]. DT expression is negatively controlled by the repressor DtxR, whose activation as a repressor requires iron; thus, tox expression is induced when iron is limiting, which deactivates DtxR as a repressor [48]. Note that our RNA-seq data revealed no significant changes of tox and dtxR transcripts in the ∆rnj mutant as compared to the parental strain (Table S1). On the contrary, many genes involved in iron transport and metabolism were affected in the ∆rnj deletion mutant (Table S1). To investigate this phenomenon further under iron-limiting conditions, cultures of the parental and ∆rnj mutant strains were treated with varying amounts of the iron-chelator EDDA (ethylene diamine diorthohydroxyphenyl acetic acid). Cell-free culture supernatants were then obtained for Western blotting analysis with antibodies against DT. In the parental strain without EDDA, the level of DT expression was negligible. However, upon addition of 10, 50, or 100 mM of the chelator, DT level increased dramatically (Figure 4A,B); by comparison, the level of DT expression in the ∆rnj mutant was about 2-fold less than that of the parental strain under the same conditions (Figure 4A,B).
Previous studies show that under iron-deprivation C. diphtheriae secretes corynebactin, a siderophore that scavenges extracellular iron, which correlates with production of DT [49,50]. To examine if siderophore production is reduced under iron-depleted conditions, we grew the ∆rnj mutant and wild-type cells in a semi-defined low-iron medium, called mPGT [51], supplemented with or without 10 μM FeCl3. Production of extracellular siderophore from the culture medium was determined by the chrome azurol S (CAS) assay, as previously reported [42,43]. As shown in Figure 5C, production of extracellular siderophore in the ∆rnj mutant was significantly reduced as compared to the wild-type strain (see also Table 3). Taken together, the results demonstrate that deletion of rnj causes reduced production of secreted diphtheria toxin and siderophore.

3.5. Virulence Attenuation of the ∆rnj Mutant in a Caenorhabditis Elegans Model of Infection

Finally, we went on to address the most critical question of whether the reduced DT production, altered cellular fitness, morphology, and metabolism observed in the ∆rnj mutant affect bacterial virulence using a previously established model host of C. elegans for C. diphtheriae infection [35,44]. In this model, batches of L4-stage nematodes of strain N2 were fed with corynebacteria, and the survival of nematodes was recorded every 24 h over time. As shown in Figure 5A (red squares), the ∆rnj mutant exhibited a significant delay in the killing of nematodes, with LT50 (time required to kill 50% of the animals) of seven days, as compared to the wild-type strain (blue circles), LT50 of which was less than five days. As expected, a mutant devoid of the repressor DtxR displayed a similar virulence phenotype as the wild-type strain (Figure 5A; ∆dtxR, orange diamonds). However, a mutant lacking both rnj and dtxR was markedly attenuated as compared to the wild-type strain, but this attenuation was less than that of the ∆rnj mutant itself (Figure 5A; ∆rnj-∆dtxR, black triangles). To examine whether cell width augmentation caused by increased expression of FtsH affects bacterial virulence, we used a strain overexpressing ftsH (see Figure 2) in this C. elegans survival assay. Importantly, the altered cell morphology did not make any difference in the rate of nematode killing as compared to the parental strain (Figure 5A). Lastly, to determine how DT affects nematode killing, we exposed C. elegans to the ∆tox mutant of C. diphtheriae. Strikingly, the rate of survival of nematodes exposed to the ∆tox mutant of C. diphtheriae was the same as the wild-type corynebacteria (Figure 5B). These results demonstrate that the genetic disruption of rnj attenuates corynebacterial virulence by affecting some mechanism distinct from diphtheria toxin-mediated killing.

4. Discussion

RNA turnover works in conjunction with transcriptional mechanisms in bacteria to permit rapid adaptation of protein synthesis to environmental challenges. While a wide variety of RNases, which partake in mRNA maturation and degradation and in turn regulation of gene expression, have been identified and characterized in many bacterial systems [5], to date there is a scarcity of information regarding these processes in the actinobacterium C. diphtheriae—a human pathogen of major significance that was contained in the past century by aggressive vaccination around the world. Bioinformatics and the biochemical and genetic studies presented here demonstrate that the C. diphtheriae DIP1463 encodes a member of the class D ribonuclease, RNase J, and that this ribonuclease acts to modulate the expression of a large number of genes involved in many cellular processes, including cell division, metabolism, and pathogenicity.
Our biochemical work using a recombinant RnJ protein demonstrated that the exoribonuclease activity of RnJ is confined within the N-terminal 327-amino acid region that comprises a widely conserved β-lactamase domain (Figure 1A). Previously, four conserved motifs—namely, I–IV—have been identified in the β-lactamase domain of RNase J proteins, and the motif II is known to harbor several histidine residues that appear to be critical for catalytic activity [52]. Consistent with this picture, our mutational analysis demonstrated that alanine substitution of the His186 and His188 residues within motif II abrogates the exoribonuclease activity of C. diphtheriae RnJ (Figure 1D). The results also imply that the β-CASP and C-terminal domains are not required for RnJ exoribonuclease activity.
The comparative transcriptome analysis by RNA-seq reported here revealed that ribonuclease RnJ is a central player of mRNA turnover in C. diphtheriae. The deletion of rnj induces differential expression of a sizable number of transcripts (387 when a 2-fold cutoff, i.e., log2-fold change of ±1, is implemented), among which L-tryptophan biosynthesis genes are highly expressed in the ∆rnj mutant (Figure 3). It is noteworthy that the RNase J1-dependent degradation of trp leader RNA has been reported in B. subtilis [53], although it is not clear if similar mechanisms would be observed in C. diphtheriae. Intriguingly, the transcript level of ftsH, coding for an inner membrane AAA+-type protease, is also elevated in the ∆rnj mutant, which exhibits a significantly wider cell width compared to the parental strain (Figure 2). Given the pivotal role of FtsH protease in cellular quality control and several critical regulatory circuits [54], we surmised that the augmentation of cell width in the ∆rnj mutant might be due to aberrant expression of ftsH. Indeed, ftsH overexpression in the parental strain leads to a similar alteration in cell morphology (Figure 2F).
Importantly, while it is striking that the ∆rnj mutant is attenuated in the C. elegans model of infection (Figure 5), this attenuation is not attributable to the aberrant cell morphology: an engineered strain with elevated FtsH mimics the altered cell morphology phenotype, but it remains as virulent as the wild-type strain (Figure 5). Even more striking is our demonstration here that although the production of diphtheria toxin is visibly reduced in the absence of rnj, and DT is one of the most significant virulence factors for human disease, the toxin itself does not play a role in nematode killing by C. diphtheriae (Figure 5B). This rather unexpected finding poses important puzzles about the virulence factors encoded by corynebacteria, whether toxigenic or not, and the role that RNase J plays in regulating some of them. A tentative clue about the candidate factors comes from a small list of metabolic genes affected by RNase J depletion—namely, the upregulation of trp operon genes required for tryptophan biosynthesis and downregulation of sdaA coding for L-serine dehydratase that converts serine to pyruvate (Figure 3 and Table S1). Importantly, tryptophan biosynthesis utilizes several key intermediate metabolites: glutamine, serine, and phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate, the essential precursor to nucleotide biosynthesis [55]. An uncontrolled capacity for tryptophan biosynthesis in the ∆rnj mutant may have a consequence of depleting cells of these essential nutrients while also producing several byproducts, e.g., glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, at an elevated rate. It is tempting to speculate that this metabolic exhaustion and imbalance could hamper corynebacterial growth within the nematode. As the number of genes affected by RnJ ribonuclease are far too many, unveiling the critical pathogenic factors will require a systematic approach to probe the various cellular pathways that are found abnormal in the ∆rnj mutant. Fortunately, this should not be too forbidding considering the convenience of the nematode model system and the facile genetic systems available to perturb the candidate factors in C. diphtheriae that are involved in the aforementioned critical metabolic pathways, as well as iron acquisition, cell surface structure, and assembly and gene regulation.
Finally, while it is clear that RnJ is a major ribonuclease in C. diphtheria mRNA metabolism, our bioinformatics analysis of the C. diphtheriae strain NCTC 13129 genome reveals that there is just one copy of RNase J in this organism and that the bacterium also encodes an RNase E homolog. Considering the established critical role of RNase E in many bacteria, and the overlapping function of RNase J in mRNA metabolism, it will be revealing to compare and contrast the regulons controlled by RnJ and RNase E in C. diphtheriae. Together, this will illuminate the conserved and unique aspects of post-transcriptional control of genes of bacterial pathogens involved in cell division, nutrient uptake, and virulence.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/9/2/389/s1, Table S1: Differential gene expression analyzed by RNA-seq in the rnj mutant; Table S2: Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study; Table S3: Primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.T.L., D.A.G., A.T., A.D. and H.T.-T. (Hung Ton-That); Data curation, T.T.L., M.T.N., Y.-W.C., C.C., J.H.L., M.W., H.T.-T. (HyLam Ton-That) and M.C.; Formal analysis, T.T.L., M.T.N., Y.-W.C., C.C., J.H.L., M.W., H.T.-T. (HyLam Ton-That), D.A.G., A.T., A.D. and H.T.-T. (Hung Ton-That); Funding acquisition, D.A.G., A.T. and H.T.-T. (Hung Ton-That); Investigation, T.T.L., M.T.N., Y.-W.C., C.C., J.H.L., M.W., H.T.-T. (HyLam Ton-That) and M.C.; Project administration, D.A.G. and H.T.-T. (Hung Ton-That); Supervision, D.A.G., A.T. and H.T.-T. (Hung Ton-That); Writing—original draft, T.T.L. and H.T.-T. (Hung Ton-That); Writing—review & editing, A.D. and H.T.-T. (Hung Ton-That) All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, under the award numbers AI076406 and AI110432 (to D.A.G.), and the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research under the award numbers DE025015 and DE017382 (to H.T.-T. (Hung Ton-That)).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to an animal protocol that was reviewed and approved by the UCLA Chancellor’s Animal Research Committee (ARC) (ARC # 2018-077-01; approval date 10/15/2018).

Data Availability Statement

The RNA-seq data have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database with the accession number of GSE165533.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ton-That lab members for critical review and discussion of the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, under the award numbers AI076406 and AI110432 (to D.A.G.), and the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research under the award numbers DE025015 and DE017382 (to H.T.-T. (Hung Ton-That)).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

References

  1. Storz, G.; Vogel, J.; Wassarman, K.M. Regulation by Small RNAs in Bacteria: Expanding Frontiers. Mol. Cell 2011, 43, 880–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Hoe, C.-H.; Raabe, C.A.; Rozhdestvensky, T.S.; Tang, T.-H. Bacterial sRNAs: Regulation in stress. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013, 303, 217–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Repoila, F.; Majdalani, N.; Gottesman, S. Small non-coding RNAs, co-ordinators of adaptation processes in Escherichia coli: The RpoS paradigm. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 48, 855–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bechhofer, D.H. Nucleotide specificity in bacterial mRNA recycling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 8765–8766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Hui, M.P.; Foley, P.L.; Belasco, J.G. Messenger RNA Degradation in Bacterial Cells. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2014, 48, 537–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Apirion, D. Isolation, genetic mapping and some characterization of a mutation in Escherichia coli that affects the processing of ribonuleic acid. Genetics 1978, 90, 659–671. [Google Scholar]
  7. Grunberg-Manago, M. Messenger RNA Stability and Its Role in Control of Gene Expression in Bacteria and Phages. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1999, 33, 193–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Carpousis, A.J. The RNA Degradosome of Escherichia coli: An mRNA-Degrading Machine Assembled on RNase E. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 61, 71–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Condon, C.; Putzer, H. The phylogenetic distribution of bacterial ribonucleases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 5339–5346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lehnik-Habrink, M.; Newman, J.; Rothe, F.M.; Solovyova, A.S.; Rodrigues, C.; Herzberg, C.; Commichau, F.M.; Lewis, R.J.; Stülke, J. RNase Y in Bacillus subtilis: A Natively Disordered Protein That is the Functional Equivalent of RNase E from Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 5431–5441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Even, S. Ribonucleases J1 and J2: Two novel endoribonucleases in B. subtilis with functional homology to E. coli RNase E. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 2141–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Condon, C. What is the role of RNase J in mRNA turnover? RNA Biol. 2010, 7, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Mathy, N.; Hébert, A.; Mervelet, P.; Bénard, L.; Dorléans, A.; De La Sierra-Gallay, I.L.; Noirot, P.; Putzer, H.; Condon, C. Bacillus subtilisribonucleases J1 and J2 form a complex with altered enzyme behaviour. Mol. Microbiol. 2010, 75, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bugrysheva, J.V.; Scott, J.R. The ribonucleases J1 and J2 are essential for growth and have independent roles in mRNA decay in Streptococcus pyogenes. Mol. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 731–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gao, P.; Pinkston, K.L.; Nallapareddy, S.R.; Van Hoof, A.; Murray, B.E.; Harvey, B.R. Enterococcus faecalis rnjB is Required for Pilin Gene Expression and Biofilm Formation. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 192, 5489–5498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Gao, P.; Pinkston, K.L.; Bourgogne, A.; Murray, B.E.; Van Hoof, A.; Harvey, B.R. Functional studies of E. faecalis RNase J2 and its role in virulence and fitness. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0175212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Chen, X.; Merritt, J.; Qi, F.; Khajotia, S.; Liu, N. RNases J1 and J2 are critical pleiotropic regulators in Streptococcus mutans. Microbiology 2015, 161, 797–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Mu, R.; Shinde, P.; Zou, Z.; Kreth, J.; Merritt, J. Examining the Protein Interactome and Subcellular Localization of RNase J2 Complexes in Streptococcus mutans. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Laalami, S.; Zig, L.; Putzer, H. Initiation of mRNA decay in bacteria. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2013, 71, 1799–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Pei, X.-Y.; Bralley, P.; Jones, G.H.; Luisi, B.F. Linkage of catalysis and 5’ end recognition in ribonuclease RNase J. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 8066–8076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Jones, S.E.; Leong, V.; Ortega, J.; Elliot, M.A. Development, Antibiotic Production, and Ribosome Assembly in Streptomyces venezuelae Are Impacted by RNase J and RNase III Deletion. J. Bacteriol. 2014, 196, 4253–4267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Bralley, P.; Aseem, M.; Jones, G.H. SCO5745, a Bifunctional RNase J Ortholog, Affects Antibiotic Production in Streptomyces coelicolor. J. Bacteriol. 2014, 196, 1197–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Rogers, E.A.; Das, A.; Ton-That, H. Adhesion by Pathogenic Corynebacteria. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2011, 715, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Collier, R.J.; Kandel, J. Structure and activity of diphtheria toxin. I. Thiol-dependent dissociation of a fraction of toxin into enzymically active and inactive fragments. J. Biol. Chem. 1971, 246, 24. [Google Scholar]
  25. Uchida, T.; Gill, D.M.; Pappenheimer, A.M. Mutation in the Structural Gene for Diphtheria Toxin carried by Temperate Phage β. Nat. New Biol. 1971, 233, 8–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Boyd, J.; Oza, M.N.; Murphy, J.R. Molecular cloning and DNA sequence analysis of a diphtheria tox iron-dependent regulatory element (dtxR) from Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 5968–5972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Fourel, G.; Phalipon, A.; Kaczorek, M. Evidence for direct regulation of diphtheria toxin gene transcription by an Fe2+-dependent DNA-binding repressor, DtoxR, in Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Infect. Immun. 1989, 57, 3221–3225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Holmes, R.K. Biology and molecular epidemiology of diphtheria toxin and the tox gene. J. Infect. Dis. 2000, 181, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kunkle, C.A.; Schmitt, M.P. Analysis of a DtxR-Regulated Iron Transport and Siderophore Biosynthesis Gene Cluster in Corynebacterium diphtheriae. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 422–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Trost, E.; Blom, J.; Soares, S.D.C.; Huang, I.-H.; Al-Dilaimi, A.; Schröder, J.; Jaenicke, S.; Dorella, F.A.; Rocha, F.S.; Miyoshi, A.; et al. Pangenomic Study of Corynebacterium diphtheriae That Provides Insights into the Genomic Diversity of Pathogenic Isolates from Cases of Classical Diphtheria, Endocarditis, and Pneumonia. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 3199–3215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ton-That, H.; Schneewind, O. Assembly of pili on the surface of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 50, 1429–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Swierczynski, A.; Ton-That, H. Type III Pilus of Corynebacteria: Pilus Length is Determined by the Level of Its Major Pilin Subunit. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 6318–6325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Gaspar, A.H.; Ton-That, H. Assembly of Distinct Pilus Structures on the Surface of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 1526–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Reardon-Robinson, M.E.; Osipiuk, J.; Jooya, N.; Chang, C.; Joachimiak, A.; Das, A.; Ton-That, H. A thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase of the Gram-positive pathogen Corynebacterium diphtheriaeis essential for viability, pilus assembly, toxin production and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 2015, 98, 1037–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Broadway, M.M.; Rogers, E.A.; Chang, C.; Huang, I.-H.; Dwivedi, P.; Yildirim, S.; Schmitt, M.P.; Das, A.; Ton-That, H. Pilus Gene Pool Variation and the Virulence of Corynebacterium diphtheriae Clinical Isolates during Infection of a Nematode. J. Bacteriol. 2013, 195, 3774–3783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Chang, C.; Nguyen, M.T.; Ton-That, H. Genetic Manipulation of Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Other Corynebacterium Species. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 2020, 58, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wittchen, M.; Busche, T.; Gaspar, A.H.; Lee, J.H.; Ton-That, H.; Kalinowski, J.; Tauch, A. Transcriptome sequencing of the human pathogen Corynebacterium diphtheriae NCTC 13129 provides detailed insights into its transcriptional landscape and into DtxR-mediated transcriptional regulation. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Reyes, O.; Guyonvarch, A.; Bonainy, C.; Salti, V.; David, F.; LeBlon, G. ‘Integron’-bearing vectors: A method suitable for stable chromosomal integration in highly restrictive Corynebacteria. Gene 1991, 107, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Luong, T.T.; Reardon-Robinson, M.E.; Siegel, S.D.; Ton-That, H. Reoxidation of the Thiol-Disulfide Oxidoreductase MdbA by a Bacterial Vitamin K Epoxide Reductase in the Biofilm-Forming Actinobacterium Actinomyces oris. J. Bacteriol. 2017, 199, e00817-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Siegel, S.D.; Amer, B.R.; Wu, C.; Sawaya, M.R.; Gosschalk, J.E.; Clubb, R.T.; Ton-That, H.; Otto, M.; Wu, H. Structure and Mechanism of LcpA, a Phosphotransferase That Mediates Glycosylation of a Gram-Positive Bacterial Cell Wall-Anchored Protein. mBio 2019, 10, e01580-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Sinturel, F.; Pellegrini, O.; Xiang, S.; Tong, L.; Condon, C.; Bénard, L. Real-time fluorescence detection of exoribonucleases. RNA 2009, 15, 2057–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Louden, B.C.; Lynne, A.M.; Haarmann, D. Use of Blue Agar CAS Assay for Siderophore Detection. J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. 2011, 12, 51–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Arora, N.K.; Verma, M. Modified microplate method for rapid and efficient estimation of siderophore produced by bacteria. 3 Biotech 2017, 7, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Chen, Y.; Ton-That, H. Corynebacterium diphtheriae Virulence Analyses Using a Caenorhabditis elegans Model. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 2020, 58, e109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Garsin, D.A.; Sifri, C.D.; Mylonakis, E.; Qin, X.; Singh, K.V.; Murray, B.E.; Calderwood, S.B.; Ausubel, F.M. A simple model host for identifying Gram-positive virulence factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 10892–10897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Santos, D.; De Almeida, D.F. Isolation and characterization of a new temperature-sensitive cell division mutant of Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 1975, 124, 1502–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Zellmeier, S.; Zuber, U.; Schumann, W.; Wiegert, T. The absence of FtsH metalloprotease activity causes overexpression of the sigmaW-controlled pbpE gene, resulting in filamentous growth of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 973–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Tao, X.; Schiering, N.; Zeng, H.-Y.; Ringe, D.; Murphy, J.R. Iron, DtxR, and the regulation of diphtheria toxin expression. Mol. Microbiol. 1994, 14, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zajdowicz, S.; Haller, J.C.; Krafft, A.E.; Hunsucker, S.W.; Mant, C.T.; Duncan, M.W.; Hodges, R.S.; Jones, D.N.M.; Holmes, R.K. Purification and Structural Characterization of Siderophore (Corynebactin) from Corynebacterium diphtheriae. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e34591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Russell, L.M.; Cryz, S.J.; Holmes, R.K. Genetic and biochemical evidence for a siderophore-dependent iron transport system in Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Infect. Immun. 1984, 45, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Allen, C.E.; Burgos, J.M.; Schmitt, M.P. Analysis of Novel Iron-Regulated, Surface-Anchored Hemin-Binding Proteins in Corynebacterium diphtheriae. J. Bacteriol. 2013, 195, 2852–2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Zhao, Y.; Lu, M.; Zhang, H.; Hu, J.; Zhou, C.; Xu, Q.; Shah, A.M.U.H.; Xu, H.; Wang, L.; Hua, Y. Structural insights into catalysis and dimerization enhanced exonuclease activity of RNase J. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 5550–5559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Deikus, G.; Condon, C.; Bechhofer, D.H. Role of Bacillus subtilis RNase J1 Endonuclease and 5′-Exonuclease Activities in trp Leader RNA Turnover. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 17158–17167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Langklotz, S.; Baumann, U.; Narberhaus, F. Structure and function of the bacterial AAA protease FtsH. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2012, 1823, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yanofsky, C. RNA-based regulation of genes of tryptophan synthesis and degradation, in bacteria. RNA 2007, 13, 1141–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Microorganisms 09 00389 g001 550
Figure 1. Corynebacterium diphtheriae encodes ribonuclease J (RnJ). (A) Presented is a diagram of a two-gene locus, in which DIP1463 is predicted to encode ribonuclease J (RnJ). The rnj gene is equipped with its own promoter but it is also part of a transcription unit with DIP1464. (B) RnJ harbors three domains—β-lactamase, β-CASP, and C-terminal. The β-lactamase region contains catalytic histidine residues in the motif II, which is highly conserved with other ribonuclease J proteins, including Bacillus subtilis (Bsub) and Mycobacterium smegmatis (Msme); numbers indicate the amino acid positions. (C) An RNA/DNA duplex, containing an RNA molecule with a fluorophore (F) at the 3′ (RNA1) and a DNA molecule with a quencher (Q) at the 5′ (DNA1), was used in a real-time fluorescence assay (RT-FeDEx) to probe exoribonuclease activity. Cleavage of RNA1 by DIP1463/RnJ permits fluorescence emission from the released fluorophore; adapted from [41]. (D) Purified RnJ recombinant proteins (wild-type and His mutants) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and stained by Coomassie Blue; molecular mass markers are shown. (E) Five hundred nM of the RNA1/DNA1 duplex was mixed with 100 nM of recombinant RnJ proteins. Fluorescence signal was monitored over time. The data are representative of two independent experiments performed in triplicate. Lysozyme and a reaction without RnJ were used as controls.
Figure 1. Corynebacterium diphtheriae encodes ribonuclease J (RnJ). (A) Presented is a diagram of a two-gene locus, in which DIP1463 is predicted to encode ribonuclease J (RnJ). The rnj gene is equipped with its own promoter but it is also part of a transcription unit with DIP1464. (B) RnJ harbors three domains—β-lactamase, β-CASP, and C-terminal. The β-lactamase region contains catalytic histidine residues in the motif II, which is highly conserved with other ribonuclease J proteins, including Bacillus subtilis (Bsub) and Mycobacterium smegmatis (Msme); numbers indicate the amino acid positions. (C) An RNA/DNA duplex, containing an RNA molecule with a fluorophore (F) at the 3′ (RNA1) and a DNA molecule with a quencher (Q) at the 5′ (DNA1), was used in a real-time fluorescence assay (RT-FeDEx) to probe exoribonuclease activity. Cleavage of RNA1 by DIP1463/RnJ permits fluorescence emission from the released fluorophore; adapted from [41]. (D) Purified RnJ recombinant proteins (wild-type and His mutants) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and stained by Coomassie Blue; molecular mass markers are shown. (E) Five hundred nM of the RNA1/DNA1 duplex was mixed with 100 nM of recombinant RnJ proteins. Fluorescence signal was monitored over time. The data are representative of two independent experiments performed in triplicate. Lysozyme and a reaction without RnJ were used as controls.
Microorganisms 09 00389 g001
Microorganisms 09 00389 g002 550
Figure 2. The C. diphtheriae ∆rnj mutant is defective in cell growth and morphology. (A,B) An in-frame, non-polar mutant of rnj was generated. The presence of rnj in the parental, deletion mutant, and complementing strains was determined by RT-PCR using probes (arrows) that detect a 351-bp amplicon; 23S rRNA was used as control. (C) Overnight cultures of C. diphtheriae indicated strains grown at 30 °C were used to inoculate fresh cultures, and their growth was monitored by OD600. (D–G) Log-phase cells were immobilized on nickel grids, stained with 1% uranyl acetate, and viewed by an electron microscope JEOL1400; scale bars indicate 0.5 μm.
Figure 2. The C. diphtheriae ∆rnj mutant is defective in cell growth and morphology. (A,B) An in-frame, non-polar mutant of rnj was generated. The presence of rnj in the parental, deletion mutant, and complementing strains was determined by RT-PCR using probes (arrows) that detect a 351-bp amplicon; 23S rRNA was used as control. (C) Overnight cultures of C. diphtheriae indicated strains grown at 30 °C were used to inoculate fresh cultures, and their growth was monitored by OD600. (D–G) Log-phase cells were immobilized on nickel grids, stained with 1% uranyl acetate, and viewed by an electron microscope JEOL1400; scale bars indicate 0.5 μm.
Microorganisms 09 00389 g002
Microorganisms 09 00389 g003 550
Figure 3. RNA-Seq analysis of the ∆rnj mutant. (A) Presented is a volcano plot of differentially transcribed genes in the ∆rnj mutant. The log2 (fold change) (LFC) was plotted against the statistical significance (−log10 of the adjusted p-value) for each gene. The dashed blue line indicates the negative log10 of the adjusted p-value of 0.05. All genes above a LFC of +1.0 and below −1.0 are colored in green and red, respectively. Genes predicted to be involved in tryptophan biosynthesis are encircled. Three genes, including the remaining part of the rnj transcript in the rnj deletion mutant, are labeled in red. (B) This insert represents a detail of the volcano plot to better indicate the position of the adjusted p-value of 0.05 (dashed blue line). (C) Differentially regulated genes with similar categorical functions based on clusters of orthologous groups are shown in a pie chart. (D) Some differentially regulated genes in the RNA-seq analysis were confirmed by RT-PCR using RNA samples collected from mid-log phase cells; 23S rRNA was used as control.
Figure 3. RNA-Seq analysis of the ∆rnj mutant. (A) Presented is a volcano plot of differentially transcribed genes in the ∆rnj mutant. The log2 (fold change) (LFC) was plotted against the statistical significance (−log10 of the adjusted p-value) for each gene. The dashed blue line indicates the negative log10 of the adjusted p-value of 0.05. All genes above a LFC of +1.0 and below −1.0 are colored in green and red, respectively. Genes predicted to be involved in tryptophan biosynthesis are encircled. Three genes, including the remaining part of the rnj transcript in the rnj deletion mutant, are labeled in red. (B) This insert represents a detail of the volcano plot to better indicate the position of the adjusted p-value of 0.05 (dashed blue line). (C) Differentially regulated genes with similar categorical functions based on clusters of orthologous groups are shown in a pie chart. (D) Some differentially regulated genes in the RNA-seq analysis were confirmed by RT-PCR using RNA samples collected from mid-log phase cells; 23S rRNA was used as control.
Microorganisms 09 00389 g003
Microorganisms 09 00389 g004 550
Figure 4. Reduced production of the exotoxin diphtheria toxin in the ∆rnj mutant. (A) Cells of the C. diphtheriae parental strain (WT) or ∆rnj mutant strain were treated with various concentrations of the iron chelator ethylene diamine diorthohydroxyphenyl acetic acid (EDDA) to induce expression of diphtheria toxin (DT). Harvested supernatants were subjected to TCA precipitation, and protein samples were immunoblotted with monoclonal antibodies against DT; arrowhead indicates the intact toxin. A loading control band from an immunoblotted membrane stained with Coomassie Blue is marked with an asterisk. The results are representative of four independent experiments. (B) Density of DT blots in (A) was quantified by ImageJ and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 5.0, with ** indicating p < 0.01. (C) Bacterial cells were grown in a semi-defined low-iron medium supplemented with 10 μM FeCl3. Production of extracellular siderophore was determined by a colorimetric assay using chrome azurol S.
Figure 4. Reduced production of the exotoxin diphtheria toxin in the ∆rnj mutant. (A) Cells of the C. diphtheriae parental strain (WT) or ∆rnj mutant strain were treated with various concentrations of the iron chelator ethylene diamine diorthohydroxyphenyl acetic acid (EDDA) to induce expression of diphtheria toxin (DT). Harvested supernatants were subjected to TCA precipitation, and protein samples were immunoblotted with monoclonal antibodies against DT; arrowhead indicates the intact toxin. A loading control band from an immunoblotted membrane stained with Coomassie Blue is marked with an asterisk. The results are representative of four independent experiments. (B) Density of DT blots in (A) was quantified by ImageJ and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 5.0, with ** indicating p < 0.01. (C) Bacterial cells were grown in a semi-defined low-iron medium supplemented with 10 μM FeCl3. Production of extracellular siderophore was determined by a colorimetric assay using chrome azurol S.
Microorganisms 09 00389 g004
Microorganisms 09 00389 g005 550
Figure 5. Virulence attenuation of the ∆rnj mutant in a C. elegans model of infection. (A) L4-stage nematodes of strain N2 were fed on corynebacteria of strains NCTC 13129 (WT, blue circles), NCTC 13129 overexpressing FtsH (green triangles), ∆rnj mutant (red squares), ∆dtxR mutant (orange diamonds), or ∆rnj-∆dtxR mutant (black triangles). Dead nematodes were recorded and removed every 24 h. (B) A similar experiment as described in (A) was carried out with the WT and ∆tox mutant (purple hexagons) strains. The results are presented as survival percentage, and statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0. Asterisks ** and *** indicate p values of <0.01 and <0.001, respectively.
Figure 5. Virulence attenuation of the ∆rnj mutant in a C. elegans model of infection. (A) L4-stage nematodes of strain N2 were fed on corynebacteria of strains NCTC 13129 (WT, blue circles), NCTC 13129 overexpressing FtsH (green triangles), ∆rnj mutant (red squares), ∆dtxR mutant (orange diamonds), or ∆rnj-∆dtxR mutant (black triangles). Dead nematodes were recorded and removed every 24 h. (B) A similar experiment as described in (A) was carried out with the WT and ∆tox mutant (purple hexagons) strains. The results are presented as survival percentage, and statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0. Asterisks ** and *** indicate p values of <0.01 and <0.001, respectively.
Microorganisms 09 00389 g005
Table
Table 1. Cell dimension of corynebacterial strains.
Table 1. Cell dimension of corynebacterial strains.
StrainsWidth (µm)Length (µm)
WT0.64 ± 0.061.26 ± 0.40
∆rnj0.99 ± 0.131.39 ± 0.36
WT/pFtsH0.90 ± 0.071.32 ± 0.33
Table
Table 2. Differential expression of representative genes involved in iron or heme transport in the ∆rnj mutant determined by RNA-seq, using a 2-fold cutoff (log2-fold change of ±1).
Table 2. Differential expression of representative genes involved in iron or heme transport in the ∆rnj mutant determined by RNA-seq, using a 2-fold cutoff (log2-fold change of ±1).
Gene NameFunctionLog2-Fold Change
iutDPutative ABC-type iron protein1.03
ciuCIron transport system membrane protein1.18
ciuECorynebactin biosynthetic gene1.24
sufBFe–S cluster assembly protein1.33
sufRIron–sulfur cluster biosynthesis transcriptional regulator1.56
piuBIron-uptake factor1.83
irp4DtxR-dependent, iron-regulated promoter/operator2.65
irp6AFerrisiderophore receptor (putative ABC transporter)−1.30
irp5DtxR-dependent, iron-regulated promoter/operator−1.33
Table
Table 3. Siderophore production of C. diphtheriae strains in high- or low-iron media.
Table 3. Siderophore production of C. diphtheriae strains in high- or low-iron media.
Strains+Fe3+−Fe3+
OD600Siderophore Production (%)OD600Siderophore Production (%)
WT3.38 ± 0.0819.30 ± 2.992.62 ± 0.2967.77 ± 2.90
∆rnj2.92 ± 0.3120.42 ± 1.972.38 ± 0.2344.49 ± 3.43
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luong, T.T.; Nguyen, M.T.; Chen, Y.-W.; Chang, C.; Lee, J.H.; Wittchen, M.; Ton-That, H.; Cruz, M.; Garsin, D.A.; Das, A.; et al. Ribonuclease J-Mediated mRNA Turnover Modulates Cell Shape, Metabolism and Virulence in Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 389. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020389

AMA Style

Luong TT, Nguyen MT, Chen Y-W, Chang C, Lee JH, Wittchen M, Ton-That H, Cruz M, Garsin DA, Das A, et al. Ribonuclease J-Mediated mRNA Turnover Modulates Cell Shape, Metabolism and Virulence in Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(2):389. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020389

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luong, Truc Thanh, Minh Tan Nguyen, Yi-Wei Chen, Chungyu Chang, Ju Huck Lee, Manuel Wittchen, HyLam Ton-That, Melissa Cruz, Danielle A. Garsin, Asis Das, and et al. 2021. "Ribonuclease J-Mediated mRNA Turnover Modulates Cell Shape, Metabolism and Virulence in Corynebacterium diphtheriae" Microorganisms 9, no. 2: 389. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020389

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop