Next Article in Journal
Respiratory Tract Infections and Laboratory Diagnostic Methods: A Review with A Focus on Syndromic Panel-Based Assays
Next Article in Special Issue
Antibiofilm Efficacy of Quercetin against Vibrio parahaemolyticus Biofilm on Food-Contact Surfaces in the Food Industry
Previous Article in Journal
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) Mediated Optimization of Medium Components for Mycelial Growth and Metabolites Production of Streptomyces alfalfae XN-04
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

What Is Candida Doing in My Food? A Review and Safety Alert on Its Use as Starter Cultures in Fermented Foods

by
Gilberto Vinícius de Melo Pereira
1,*,
Bruna Leal Maske
1,
Dão Pedro de Carvalho Neto
2,
Susan Grace Karp
1,
Juliano De Dea Lindner
3,
José Guilherme Prado Martin
4,
Bianca de Oliveira Hosken
4 and
Carlos Ricardo Soccol
1,*
1
Department of Bioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba 80230-901, PR, Brazil
2
Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Paraná (IFPR), Londrina 86041-120, PR, Brazil
3
Department of Food Science and Technology, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis 88040-900, SC, Brazil
4
Microbiology Department, Federal University of Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(9), 1855; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091855
Submission received: 29 July 2022 / Revised: 2 September 2022 / Accepted: 7 September 2022 / Published: 16 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Safety of Fermented Products 2.0)

Abstract

:
The use of yeasts as starter cultures was boosted with the emergence of large-scale fermentations in the 20th century. Since then, Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been the most common and widely used microorganism in the food industry. However, Candida species have also been used as an adjuvant in cheese production or as starters for coffee, cocoa, vegetable, meat, beer, and wine fermentations. A thorough screening of candidate Candida is sometimes performed to obtain the best performing strains to enhance specific features. Some commonly selected species include C. pulcherrima (teleomorph Metschnikowia pulcherrima) (wine), C. parapsilosis (teleomorph Monilia parapsilosis) (coffee), C. famata (teleomorph Debaryomyces hansenii) (cheese), and C. zeylanoides (teleomorph Kurtzmaniella zeylanoides) and C. norvegensis (teleomorph Pichia norvegensis) (cocoa). These species are associated with the production of key metabolites (food aroma formation) and different enzymes. However, safety-associated selection criteria are often neglected. It is widely known that some Candida species are opportunistic human pathogens, with important clinical relevance. Here, the physiology and metabolism of Candida species are addressed, initially emphasizing their clinical aspects and potential pathogenicity. Then, Candida species used in food fermentations and their functional roles are reported. We recommended that Candida not be used as food cultures if safety assessments are not performed. Some safety features are highlighted to help researchers choose methods and selection criteria.

1. Introduction

Yeasts have been exploited by humans for millennia to produce beers, wines, and a wide range of other fermented foods. Among nonconventional yeasts, Candida is frequently present in cheese, coffee, cocoa, vegetables, meat, and alcoholic spontaneous fermentations [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Candida species are able to utilize different carbon sources and produce enzymes, acids, and other by-products [7]. Recent metagenomics approaches have also confirmed the presence of Candida in natural fermentations, but being rarely dominant [8]. It is because other microbial groups, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae and lactic acid bacteria, initiate growth and accumulate by-products (ethanol and lactic acid, respectively), inhibiting Candida growth.
With the advancement of large-scale fermentations, the use of starter cultures began to be developed, and numerous microorganisms were selected with specific characteristics for various food commodities. A range of studies indicate that Saccharomyces and Lactobacillus are the most widely used starter cultures in the food industry, highlighting alcoholic beverages and dairy products, respectively [9]. Nonetheless, Candida is also applied to produce various food commodities since its use as an adjuvant in cheese production or as starters for coffee, cocoa, vegetables, wine, beer, and meat fermentations. They are generally used in co-inoculations with Saccharomyces and Lactobacillus. For example, C. zemplinina (teleomorph Starmerella bacillaris) and M. (Candida) pulcherrima were used together with commercial S. cerevisiae to produce wines with less alcohol and more glycerol or ethyl acetate [3].
On the other side of the coin, Candida genus is well known for causing infections, especially in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) [10]. Although most systemic infections are caused by C. albicans, other species have also been frequently reported in clinical studies. Some important examples include C. utilis (teleomorph Cyberlindnera jadinii), C. tropicalis, Monilia (Candida) parapsilosis, and M. (Candida) pulcherrina [3,5,6]. Therefore, the presence of Candida in food may represent a potential risk to public health [11]. In the plankton form, non-Candida albicans species (C. krusei (teleomorph Pichia kudriavzevii), C. lusitaniae (teleomorph Clavispora lusitaniae), D. (Candida) famata, C. colliculosa, M. (Candida) parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis) present biotypes and virulence factors similar to those of C. albicans, demonstrating the risk of their delivery from fermented foods [11] (Figure 1). However, Koh [12] reinforces that studies in an animal model should be carried out to prove the invasive capacity and dissemination of isolates of food origin.
This current review summarizes the common Candida species used in fermented foods. Initially, we reported the physiological, metabolic, and pathogenic characteristics of the Candida group. Then, an association between food-related Candida and pathogenicity evaluation is presented for its safety in fermented products.

2. Physiology and Metabolism

The genus Candida was described for the first time in 1923 by the Danish microbiologist Christine Berkhout, even though since 1853 the species Oidium albicans Robin, today classified as C. albicans, had been known. The genus name is derived from the Latin word candidus, which means “white” since these microorganisms do not produce carotenoid dyes and their colonies are whitish in color [13]. About one-quarter of all yeast species belong to the genus Candida, which comprises around 200 species today, of which around 40 are human pathogens. Originally, Candida species were described as ascomycetous yeasts able to form hyphae or pseudohyphae without sexual spores. According to recent phylogenetic analyses, Candida species were confirmed to belong to a polyphyletic group within the Saccharomycotina subdivision, under the Ascomycota division, Hemiascomycetes class, Saccharomycetales order, and Saccharomycetaceae family in the fungal kingdom [13,14,15].
Candida is classified as an anamorphic genus because of the lack of a sexual reproduction stage. Asexual multiplication (mitosis) in Candida is characterized as multipolar or multilateral, where budding occurs at many sites on the cell wall. However, several Candida species have now been shown to undergo mating and meiosis, and population studies indicate that, for some species, sexual reproduction is at least a possibility [16]. The sexual reproductive stage, denominated teleomorph, can be differentiated from the corresponding anamorph by phylogenetic analysis [17], in the sense that a species may have two names that correlate to the growth stage of the yeast. Examples are Candida pelliculosa (anamorph) × Wickerhamomyces anomalus (teleomorph); Candida guilliermondii (anamorph) × Meyerozyma guilliermondii (teleomorph); Candida kefyr (anamorph) × Kluyveromyces marxianus (teleomorph); Candida krusei (anamorph) × Pichia kudriavzevii (teleomorph); Candida lipolytica (anamorph) × Yarrowia lipolytica (teleomorph); Candida lambica (anamorph) × Pichia fermentans (teleomorph); Candida utilis (anamorph) × Cyberlindnera jadinii (teleomorph) (CDC 2021).
Yeast cells of the genus Candida are usually oval, ellipsoidal, or elongated, with sizes in the range of (1–8) × (1–6) μm2. They can grow as single cells (cell budding with separation of the newborn cells), as pseudohyphae (cell budding without separation of the newborn cells), or as true hyphae (no budding, hyphae formation with transverse walls). Yeasts that reproduce by hyphae formation in addition to budding are classified as dimorphs and are represented by the species C. albicans, Candida amapae (teleomorph Saccharomycopsis amapae), Candida bertae, Candida castrensis, Candida chilensis, Candida chiropterorum, Candida edax, Candida entomophila, Candida fennica, Candida homilentoma (r teleomorph Hyphopichia homilentoma), Candida insectorum, Candida lipolytica (teleomorph Yarrowia lipolytica), Candida lyxosophila, Candida mesenterica, Candida paludigena, C. railenensis, and Candida tropicalis [13,14].
Candida is a heterogeneous genus that comprises microorganisms with different physiologic and metabolic characteristics. The guanine-cytosine content of the DNA can vary between 30 and 62.7%, and there are four ubiquinone types within the genus, namely, CoQ 6, 7, 8, and 9. Regarding the use of carbon sources by the strains already described, 71% of Candida species utilize xylose, 57% utilize cellobiose, 29% are able to oxidize alkanes, 27% can utilize starch, and 7% can use methanol. This nutrition profile is in accordance with the fact that most Candida species are associated with plants, decaying biomass, insects, and foods. Besides, about 85% of the species are dependent on vitamins synthesized by plants. Concerning their growth temperature, most Candida species are mesophilic. They grow well in temperatures between 20 °C and 25 °C, but few species are able to grow above 37–40 °C [14]. Optimal growth temperatures range between 25 °C and 30 °C, while optimal pH values are between 4.0 and 6.0. Candida strains are usually aerobic and can produce small amounts of alcohol during aeration. Many strains synthesize other extracellular metabolites, such as citric acid, xylitol, erythritol, biosurfactants, exopolysaccharides, and enzymes [13].
Different species of Candida are known to produce sophorolipids—extracellular glycolipids that are the most common biosurfactants used in cosmetics and pharmacology. One example is the mannosyl erythritol lipid, a yeast glycolipid produced from vegetable oils by Candida strains [18]. A novel biosurfactant with antibacterial activity against pathogenic Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus was obtained from M. (Candida) parapsilosis. The biosurfactant was identified as a docosenamide-type compound with a 337.5 g/mol [19].
P. (Candida) krusei is an acid-resistant and thermo-tolerant species, able to grow at low pH (3–4) and high temperatures (40–43 °C). The proposition that P. (Candida) krusei is the anamorph of P. kudriavzevii dates from 1980, by Kurtzman and collaborators. This strain can also be identified in the literature as Issatchenkia orientalis and Candida glycerinogenes. The yeast is naturally present in milk and in many other fermented foods such as cheese, sourdough breads, kefir, fermented cassava, and cocoa fermentation. It does not excrete any extracellular toxins and can be used, for example, in the synthesis of single-cell proteins [20]. This strain is employed for industrial-scale production of glycerol and succinate and is also able to synthesize bioethanol [21].
Some Candida species, such as C. pelliculosa, M. (Candida) parapsilosis, and Candida pyralidae, demonstrate killer activity against undesired or pathogenic organisms. This activity, first described by Bevan and Makower in 1963 on an S. cerevisiae strain, is attributed to the production of killer toxins or killer factors, which are proteinaceous antimicrobial compounds secreted by yeasts. The killer activity of Candida yeasts can be useful to control spoilage organisms in various environments, such as fermented foods and beverages [22,23].

3. Clinical Relevance

Most Candida species live in commensalism relation with animals and humans, being part of the resident or transient gut microbiota, mucocutaneous tissues, and skin. Studies indicate that 70% of the healthy human population carries, asymptotically, Candida species [24]. However, among the more than 200 Candida species reported, about 20% are considered pathogenic. C. albicans, the most prevalent and invasive species, are frequently isolated from the nosocomial environment and GIT. This species is one of the most representative of what is understood as an opportunistic pathogen, given its prevalence in healthy individuals. At the same time, it consists of the etiological agent most commonly related to systemic fungal infections [25].
Contamination by Candida sp. was considered superficial and rare until the early 1960s [26]. Since then, new cases have become frequent in hospital infections. It is speculated that the widespread use of antibiotics was the indirect cause of the increase and dissemination of contamination by Candida sp. The hypothesis is that, by eliminating bacteria from the human microbiota through antibiotics, Candida and other yeasts have increased their numbers mainly in the GIT. Furthermore, antitumor drugs can potentially damage the mucosa of the GIT, facilitating invasion through the membrane of enterocytes into the bloodstream and, consequently, the spread of the fungus to the other organs [11].
The most frequent reservoirs of C. albicans are superficial infections affecting the skin, mucous membranes of the female genital system, oral cavity, and GTI. However, in healthy individuals, yeast is in significantly lower populations than other microbial groups, since only 0.1% of the human microbiome corresponds to eukaryotic microorganisms or viruses [27]. An increase in yeast numbers can occur through a change in the microbial population in the mucous membranes with a preponderant growth of Candida.
In immunocompromised patients, the presence of Candida sp. in the bloodstream results in a wide range of severe manifestations. This condition, known as candidemia, affects different organs, such as the liver, spleen, and eyes [28,29]. The main mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of invasive candidiasis include the following: imbalance of the gut microbiota, which enables the significant growth of Candida species in the intestine; some lesions to the GIT mucosa, which favor invasion by the fungus; impairment of the host’s immune response, which may result in severe generalized infection [24].
As mentioned, C. albicans can be present in the form of unicellular yeast, multicellular pseudohyphae, or filamentous hyphae. The morphogenesis from leveduriform to a hypha state is an important virulence mechanism [30]. In general, the leveduriform state is more associated with the relationship of commensalism with the host, and hyphae form with the condition of pathogenicity (Figure 1). One of the reasons for this phenomenon is that hyphae yeasts are less likely to be phagocytized, being able to escape from the host defense cells [31]. However, in non-C. albicans (NCAC) species, the transition from the leveduriform form to hyphae is not a condition for invasion of host tissue, as observed for Candida glabrata (teleomorph Nakaseomyces glabrataa) and M. (Candida) parapsilosis [32]. In any event, the balance between both states depends on the components of the fungus’s cell wall, known as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), represented primarily by human host cell pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) [33].
Candida harbors a wide variety of ecological habitats in nature due to its versatility in acquiring nutrients, metabolic flexibility, and resistance to stress factors [25]. In GIT, the transition from commensal to pathogenic form involves the adaptation to changes in pH, oxygen, and nutrient availability, and the interaction with the rich and diverse resident microbiota. Subsequently, different mechanisms favor the adhering and invasion of host cells; once disseminated, C. albicans cells must protect themselves and adapt to the host’s immune system, which involves different signaling factors and networks [25].
C. albicans corresponds to the main antifungal T helper 17 (Th17) cell inducer in humans [34]. Such cells correspond to key pieces in the body’s immune responses against the invasion of bacteria and fungi, organizing barrier immunity, especially on the skin and mucosa of GIT [35]. Immune responses related to specific T cells of C. albicans broadly modulate antifungal immunity through cross-reactions with other species, constituting a central mechanism for systemic induction of antifungal responses in humans as well as a risk factor for inflammatory lung diseases caused by other fungal species [34]. Unbalanced immune responses, dependent on Th17 cells, may also contribute to the development of different types of disorders, including inflammatory bowel diseases [36]. In addition, the role of the mycobiome and its influence on specific conditions, such as autism, metabolic syndromes, chronic viral infections, and even tumorigenesis, has been investigated [33,37,38].
The virulence factors of C. albicans and NCAC are fundamental for colonization and invasiveness. However, the efficiency of colonization varies among individuals, being affected by immunological competence, use of medications with consequent impairment of the gut microbiota, and oral hygiene, among others that may result in fungal dysbiosis (i.e., intestinal flora imbalance) [30,39,40]. The main virulence factors include (i) growth at 37 °C, (ii) secretion of hydrolytic enzymes (which confer the capacity to destroy host tissues), (iii) epithelial adhering ability (essential for surface colonization), (iv) hemolytic activity (which enables the degradation of red blood cells and consequent access to nutrients), and (v) formation of biofilm (important for the colonization of surfaces, as well as for resistance to antifungal agents) [11]. The latter is significant for Candida of food sources, given the ability to colonize surfaces that encounter food in the production environment and packaging.
Although C. albicans is commonly used as a model organism for fungal pathogens, the relevance of other species has also been demonstrated, such as N. (Candida) glabrata, M. (Candida) parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, P. (Candida) krusei, and Candida guilliermondii (r teleomorph Meyerozyma guilliermondii) [41]. Hirayama et al. [42] evaluated the degree of pathogenicity of six important virulent species of Candida. Mice fed a low protein diet were inoculated intragastrically with Candida cells, in addition to receiving oral antibiotics and cyclophosphamide (an immunosuppressive drug) to facilitate fungal invasion and dissemination in the GTI. C. albicans and C. tropicalis resulted in higher mortality rates, and the former demonstrated higher invasiveness power, resulting in marked necrosis in liver tissues.
The condition of mycobiome eubiosis—that is, balanced interaction between host and fungi [43]—still needs further elucidation to understand in what proportions, in the GTI, Candida is classified as low risk for humans. It may vary depending on factors such as gender, age, type of diet, and associated comorbidities [38]. The ingestion of probiotics has been suggested as an important strategy to prevent the dysbiosis caused by Candida [44]. Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria, for example, produce organic acids from carbohydrate intake, reducing the GTI pH and, consequently, inhibiting the growth of Candida and other pathogens [45]. Some additional antagonism factors include competing for nutrients and the production of toxic molecules (e.g., bacteriocins, biosurfactants, and hydrogen peroxide) [46]. Furthermore, the fact that probiotics affect the development of Enterobacteriaceae can prevent intestinal colonization by C. albicans; members of the Enterobacteriaceae family produce liposaccharides that induce Candida growth in the GTI [30,46].

4. Isolation and Cultivability

The correct and rapid etiological identification of Candida from complex samples is usually performed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) and Vitek card [47]. However, these methods can result in the misidentification of some strains. Candida auris, for example, are mistakenly identified by Vitek 2® (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) as C. haemulonii, C. duobushaemulonii, D. (Candida) famata, or N. (Candida) glabrata [48]. Thus, the identification of Candida species by conventional morphology and assimilation tests is still being used today. The conventional medium mostly used to isolate Candida spp. is Sabouraud glucose or dextrose agar (SDA). However, SDA supports general pathogenic fungal requirements and does not guarantee the differentiation between species in mixed yeast cultures [49]. Usually, SDA is incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24–48 h, and grown colonies show a cream, smooth, pasty convex pattern [50]. The diversity of isolation media and incubation conditions are shown in Table 1. Another example of a conventional cultivation medium is Pagano-Levin, which contains triphenyltetrazolium chloride in its composition, and, when reduced, it can distinguish C. albicans from other species due to its pale colonies alongside pinkish non-C. albicans [50]. Pagano-Levin agar has a similar sensitivity to SDA but is superior for the detection of more than one species in the sample.
Subsequently, improved culture media arose to allow, besides cultivation, species differentiation, and presumptive identification in complex samples. Chromogenic formulation agars, such as CHROMagar Candida (CAC) and Candida ID, have high sensitivity and specificity for more than 99% of isolates [75]. The species can also be identified 24 h earlier than with conventional culture media [52]. Candida ID agar is based on the chromogenic indolyl glucosaminide substrate, which is hydrolyzed by C. albicans and C. dubliniensis to yield a blue product. The CAC medium contains chromogenic beta-glucosaminidase substrate that reacts with species-specific enzymes to give colonies with different colors [49]. This medium allows the identification of C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and P. (Candida) krusei. Some reports have suggested that CAC can provide an indication of the presence of C. albicans, C. tropicalis, P. (Candida) krusei, N. (Candida) glabrata, and discrimination of C. dubliniensis from C. albicans [50,75]. Colorful indication represents green to C. albicans, dark green to C. dubliniensis, blue to C. tropicalis, pale to P. (Candida) krusei, and pink to C. auris [50]. Using this medium, the temperature of incubation seems to be an additional differentiator between species, as well as carbon source and salinity. Incubation at 45 °C, for example, failure to grow C. dubliniensis, while promoting C. albicans growth [90]. Giammanco et al. [76] failed to grow D. (Candida) pararugosa, D. (Candida) rugosa, C. maris, C. silvanorum and Candida magnoliae (teleomorph Starmerella magnoliae) in SBA and CAC at 37 °C. N. (Candida) glabrata showed restriction to the use of dextrose as the only carbon source, and C. auris was the only isolate that grew at high salinity (10% wt/vol) on SAB in comparation to other species [54]. To overcome these failures, some modified culture media are proposed to increase isolation efficiency. Examples include SCA medium that adds crystal violet (0.5 mg/L) to differentiate C. auris from C. tropicalis [91], the addition of sodium chloride and ferrous sulfate in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) agar named Selective Auris Medium (SAM) to isolate C auris [48], and CAC with Pal’s medium addition to improve differentiation of C. dubliniensis from C. albicans [92].
Candida species are also isolated from animals of food importance, such as cows, avians, sows, and geese. C. albicans, N. (Candida) glabrata, C tropicalis, C. (Candida) utilis, and M. (Candida) parapsilosis are the main reported species [46,77,84] isolated from SBA and chromogenic agar. These cultivation media are useful for monitoring food source animals, which are considered the most important vehicle in transmitting pathogenic food-borne microorganisms to humans [93]. The World Health Organization (WHO) states that illness due to contaminated food is perhaps the most widespread health problem and an important cause of reduced economic productivity [94]. The predominance of the Candida genus and the presence of C. albicans were reported in various cattle mastitis cases contaminating milk during udder, affecting milk quality in the dairy industry and consumers’ safety [79]. Another cross-infection C. albicans route can be through raw meat, e.g., chicken and mutton [46]. This suggests the need to control hygienic parameters for the handling and storage of raw meat [77]. Differently from clinical and food sources, studies of Candida associated with animal sources use more generalist culture media, such as potato dextrose agar (PDA), yeast malt agar (YM), and yeast peptone glucose agar (YPD), to increase the isolation spectrum. Usually, it is supplemented with chloramphenicol to avoid bacterial growth [87,88,89].

5. Candida Diversity in Cultured Foods and Biotechnological Importance

Candida species are common microorganisms identified in the phyllosphere (e.g., leaves, flowers, fruits, and stems), playing pivotal roles in ecological interactions between superior plants-insects and agricultural practices [95,96]. These epiphytic residents are able to consume plant nutrients and thrive in the interior of plant tissues; their prevalence is associated with edaphoclimatic conditions, geographical location, plant genotype, and fruit ripening stage [97,98,99]. A study conducted by Vadkertiová et al. [96] evaluated the diversity and prevalence of yeasts in the blossoms and fruits of apple, pear, and plum trees. The results indicated a higher overall diversity observed in blossom tissues, which can be associated with cross-contamination of commensal yeasts present in the GTI of insects [100]. Regarding Candida, C. tropicalis was the only species identified in both plum blossom and fruit, while Candida boidinii and Candida catenulata were present exclusively in the blossom of apple and pear, respectively. Jones et al. [101], on the other hand, investigated the relative abundance of yeasts in different maturation stages of blueberries, cherries, raspberries, and strawberries. The quantitative analysis using the metabarcoding approach revealed that, although Candida species represented only 2.4% of the total OTU reads, they were the most diverse genus, accounting for over 20% of the identified phylotypes. S. (Candida) zemplinina, C. rancensis, C. (Candida) membranifaciens (teleomorph Candida flareri), C. argentea, C. railenensis, and C. kofuensis were the most relevant species reported.
These evidences reinforce the importance of Candida species to the food industry since this group of yeasts is part of the wild microbiota of many fermented foods. A recent study by Arroyo-López [102] evaluated Candida diversity during fruit reception, brine, and table olive fermentation. C. diddensiae and M. (Candida) parapsilosis were identified during all processing stages, while C. tartivorans and C. tropicalis were restricted to brine and fermented fruits, respectively. Interesting results were also evidenced by Abdo et al. [103], which evaluated the prevalence and diversity of fungi species on floors, walls, and equipment before and up to two years after the arrival of the industrial plant. Using a metabarcoding approach, the study evidenced that the Candida genus was found only in used machinery before the first harvest, whereas showing an incremental relative prevalence after subsequent harvests. However, this pattern is not restricted to the previously mentioned substrates. After the analysis of the metadata from over 120 published papers, Pereira et al. [9] stated that Candida was the only genus reported in all the different types of fermentation (alkaline, alcoholic, acetic, lactic, and mixed processes) associated with numerous fermented foods and beverages.
Apart from its ubiquitous presence, Candida also possesses a complex metabolic machinery that allows its survival, competition, and, sometimes, dominance during fermentative processes [104]. Some species (e.g., Candida versatilis (teleomorph Wickerhamiella versatilis), S. (Candida) zemplinina, and S. (Candida) magnoliae) are osmotolerant and able to grow in musts with increased sugar content or stressful conditions due to high salt concentrations [105,106,107]. The presence of these stressful conditions increases glucose uptake due to changes in the affinity of membrane transporters encoded by SNF3, HXT1, and HXT2 genes and the redirection of the glycolytic flux towards glycerol production [108,109]. S. (Candida) zemplinina, frequently isolated from oenological terroir [110], also exhibits a fructophilic nature (i.e., preference of fructose over glucose as the main carbon source), a feature recently explored in fermented products with high residual sugar content, such as cocoa and coffee [111,112]. Last but not least, several Candida species can also produce a wide range of flavor and odor-active organic compounds, such as esters, aldehydes, and higher alcohols, through assimilation and metabolization of amino acids and higher alcohols via the Ehrlich pathway and esterification reactions, respectively [113,114].
All these factors have increased the interest in research that uses Candida as starter cultures for fermented foods. Table 2 shows some examples of Candida species and their applications in fermented foods. Due to the driven evolution caused by global warming, grape musts are showing superior sugar content, which may lead to an undesirable increase in the ethanolic grade of wines produced by pure Saccharomyces fermentation [115]. In this sense, several researches are exploiting the potential of non-Saccharomyces yeasts for mixed and sequential fermentation processes [116,117]. The inoculation of pure S. (Candida) zemplinina achieved a similar cell count compared to S. cerevisiae. However, an inhibitory effect against S. cerevisiae could be observed when S. (Candida) zemplinina was inoculated previously [1]. These observations can be associated with the yeast-specific nitrogen assimilation profiles, where histidine, methionine, threonine, and tyrosine are preferred consumed by S. (Candida) zemplinina in temperatures of up to 28 °C, resulting in poorer performances of S. cerevisiae [118]. Apart from ecological interactions between the starter cultures, the addition of S. (Candida) zemplinina resulted in a superior aroma complexity due to enhanced production of esters, higher alcohols, and free terpenes [1,119,120].
Mixed fermentations, such as cocoa and coffee beans, harbor a diverse and heterologous group of microorganisms, which directly contribute to the aroma and flavor development of the final products. M. (Candida) parapsilosis have been selected based on its high pectinolytic activity, resistance to stressful conditions (high temperatures, acidity, high ethanol concentration, among others), killer factor, and production of aroma-active compounds [5,131]. The pure inoculation of M. (Candida) parapsilosis in cocoa and coffee fermentation resulted in significant changes in sugar and amino acids inside the beans, which are important precursors for the aroma development [5,122,124]. However, these traits resulted in a higher residual sugar content in the fermenting pulp-bean mass, which could lead to the development of spoilage microorganisms during the drying process.
The use of Candida species as starter cultures in fermented milk has also been exploited. Biagiotti et al. [127] investigated the yeast microbiota involved in the ripening of Italian Fossa cheese, revealing the presence of K. (Candida) zeylanoides and H. (Candida) homilentoma during the process. To assess the impact on the ripening process, the inoculation of C. zeylanoides and H. (Candida) homilentoma resulted in lower mold colonization and desirable sensorial characteristics, including flavor quality, intensity, and body texture. Besides technological and sensorial aspects, the antioxidant and antimicrobial activity against Bacillus subtilis has also been explored in bovine colostrum fermentation after Y. (Candida) lipolytica inoculation, which demonstrated superior results in comparison to a commercial probiotic culture [126].

6. Candida Pathogenicity Evaluation

Different Candida strains used as starter cultures, including P. (Candida) krusei, M. (Candida) parapsilosis, M. (Candida) guilliermondii, and K. (Candida) kefyr, have been associated with some type of fungal infection, although they are generally considered less virulent than C. albicans [91,132,133]. Their classification can be controversial between nonpathogenic yeast or non-albicans opportunistic pathogenic yeast. Thus, the pathogenicity and drug resistance of Candida strains must be previously evaluated before their use in foods and beverages. Virulence attributes can be evaluated by testing adhesion ability, biofilm formation capacity, production of phospholipases and proteinases, dimorphic transition, susceptibility to antifungal agents, and immune host response.
Firstly, Candida starter candidates can be evaluated for their genetic similarity with recognized pathogenic yeasts (e.g., C. albicans) as a primary assessment. Phylogenetic tree analysis, through the neighbor-joining method, revealed proximity between C. tropicalis and C. albicans, for example [7]. Moreover, P. (Candida) krusei was considered an opportunistic pathogenic yeast and is closely related to the well-defined opportunistic N. (Candida) glabrata. Secondly, adherence ability to host epithelial cells must be accessed, which is the first step to colonization and invasion. Key virulence genes (e.g., Hwp1p, EAP1, CaMnt1p, and Csf4) can be checked by the sequencing method or specific PCR primer sets. Moreover, epithelial adherence can be tested by an adhesion assay. Segal et al. [134] showed that buccal epithelial cells were incubated with Candida cells for 2 h. Biofilm formation can also be quantified. Jin et al. [135] used microtiter plates to produce Candida biofilms while cell suspension was aspirated and washed to remove loosely adherent cells. Then, cells were quantified by 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-[(phenylamino) carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide (XTT) reduction and crystal violet assay.
Hydrolytic enzymes (e.g., phospholipases and proteinases) can be secreted by pathogenic fungi and estimate invasiveness. Secretion is linked to the presence of aspartyl proteinase (SAP1–SAP8) and phospholipase (PLB1 and PLB2) genes [136]. Extracellular phospholipase activity can also be evaluated by the plate method. The presence of halo means precipitation from hydrolysis of phosphatidylcholine by concentrated culture filtrates [137]. To access the strain drug resistance, an in vitro evaluation of antifungal susceptibility can be performed via a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assay using innumerous antimycotics, such as azoles (fluconazole (FL), ketoconazole (KE), and itraconazole (IT)), amphotericin B (APB; polyenic) and flucytosine (FC; pyrimidine) on Petri dishes [138].
More meticulous tests can be performed, including yeast morphological modifications and host immunological response. Some Candida species present dimorphic transitions, enabling switching between yeast and hyphae morphologies. Yeast shape is usually non-invasive, while the hypha apparatus is prone to penetrating human cells [139]. Yang et al. [140] observed by microscopy the hyphae development of C. albicans in both liquid and agar media (YPD+10% fetal bovine serum). The authors also evaluated the interaction between yeast and oral epithelial cells and performed endocytosis, invasion, and damage in in vitro assays. The intensity of Candida infection depends directly on the host immune system response. Studies have shown that N. (Candida) glabrata and C. albicans infection induce the specific proinflammatory cytokines TNF-a, IL-12, and IFN-g, being TNF-a the major one in host defense against systemic candidiasis cases. In vivo evaluation of pathogenesis was analyzed by Brieland et al. [141]. Mice kidney samples were submitted to real-time RT-PCR to study the kinetics of cytokine induction and to ELISA kits to analyze the immunoreactivity of cytokines.

7. Conclusions

The use of Candida as starter cultures has shown important roles in fermented foods. They increase the content of aromatic compounds in wines and fermented milks and contribute to the pulping of cocoa and coffee beans, in addition to participating as an adjunct in the production of cheeses. However, there are serious concerns about infections caused by this yeast group in humans and animals. Although most cases of invasive yeast infection are attributed to C. albicans, there are increasing rates of non-C. albicans species in various parts of the world. Therefore, we recommend that pathogenicity tests be performed as a precondition for the use of Candida in food studies. These tests include the production of molecules that mediate adhesion to and invasion into host cells, the secretion of hydrolases, the yeast-to-hypha transition, biofilm formation, phenotypic switching, and a range of fitness attributes. Furthermore, safety-related genes, including harmful metabolite production and adhesion ability, can be studied using next-generation sequencing techniques or other mechanistic omics tools. Nonetheless, genomics may reveal only a theoretical risk level because gene expression is dependent on environmental conditions. Thus, genomic data must be confirmed by in vitro studies and human clinical trials for the safe use of Candida in foods.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

This study did not report any data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Englezos, V.; Rantsiou, K.; Torchio, F.; Rolle, L.; Gerbi, V.; Cocolin, L. Exploitation of the Non-Saccharomyces Yeast Starmerella Bacillaris (Synonym Candida Zemplinina) in Wine Fermentation: Physiological and Molecular Characterizations. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 199, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Van Wyk, N.; Pretorius, I.S.; von Wallbrunn, C. Assessing the Oenological Potential of Nakazawaea Ishiwadae, Candida Railenensis and Debaryomyces Hansenii Strains in Mixed-Culture Grape Must Fermentation with Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Fermentation 2020, 6, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zohre, D.E.; Erten, H. The Influence of Kloeckera Apiculata and Candida Pulcherrima Yeasts on Wine Fermentation. Process Biochem. 2002, 38, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Samagaci, L.; Ouattara, H.; Niamké, S.; Lemaire, M. Pichia Kudrazevii and Candida Nitrativorans Are the Most Well-Adapted and Relevant Yeast Species Fermenting Cocoa in Agneby-Tiassa, a Local Ivorian Cocoa Producing Region. Food Res. Int. 2016, 89, 773–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Santos, D.S.; Rezende, R.P.; dos Santos, T.F.; de Lima Silva Marques, E.; Ferreira, A.C.R.; de Cerqueira e Silva, A.B.; Romano, C.C.; da Cruz Santos, D.W.; Dias, J.C.T.; Bisneto, J.D.T. Fermentation in Fine Cocoa Type Scavina: Change in Standard Quality as the Effect of Use of Starters Yeast in Fermentation. Food Chem. 2020, 328, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alloue-Boraud, W.A.M.; N’Guessan, K.F.; Djeni, N.T.; Hiligsmann, S.; Djè, K.M.; Delvigne, F. Fermentation Profile of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae and Candida Tropicalis as Starter Cultures on Barley Malt Medium. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 5236–5242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yadav, J.S.S.; Bezawada, J.; Yan, S.; Tyagi, R.D.; Surampalli, R.Y. Candida Krusei: Biotechnological Potentials and Concerns about Its Safety. Can. J. Microbiol. 2012, 58, 937–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stefanini, I.; Cavalieri, D. Metagenomic Approaches to Investigate the Contribution of the Vineyard Environment to the Quality of Wine Fermentation: Potentials and Difficulties. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De Melo Pereira, G.V.; De Carvalho Neto, D.P.; Junqueira, A.C.D.O.; Karp, S.G.; Letti, L.A.J.; Magalhães Júnior, A.I.; Soccol, C.R. A Review of Selection Criteria for Starter Culture Development in the Food Fermentation Industry. Food Rev. Int. 2020, 36, 135–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Miranda, L.N.; van der Heijden, I.M.; Costa, S.F.; Sousa, A.P.I.; Sienra, R.A.; Gobara, S.; Santos, C.R.; Lobo, R.D.; Pessoa, V.P.; Levin, A.S. Candida Colonisation as a Source for Candidaemia. J. Hosp. Infect. 2009, 72, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rajkowska, K.; Kunicka-Styczyńska, A. Typing and Virulence Factors of Food-Borne Candida spp. Isolates. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 279, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Koh, A.Y. Murine Models of Candida Gastrointestinal Colonization and Dissemination. Eukaryot. Cell 2013, 12, 1416–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kieliszek, M.; Kot, A.M.; Bzducha-Wróbel, A.; BŁażejak, S.; Gientka, I.; Kurcz, A. Biotechnological Use of Candida Yeasts in the Food Industry: A Review. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2017, 31, 185–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Schauer, F.; Hanschke, R. Zur Taxonomie Und Ökologie Der Gattung Candida: Taxonomy and Ecology of the Genus Candida. Mycoses 1999, 42, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ghazi, S.; Rafei, R.; Osman, M.; El Safadi, D.; Mallat, H.; Papon, N.; Dabboussi, F.; Bouchara, J.P.; Hamze, M. The Epidemiology of Candida Species in the Middle East and North Africa. J. Mycol. Med. 2019, 29, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alby, K.; Bennett, R.J. Sexual Reproduction in the Candida Clade: Cryptic Cycles, Diverse Mechanisms, and Alternative Functions. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2010, 67, 3275–3285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Beware of Alternate Names for Candida Species; CDC: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2021; Volume 106. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mitrea, L.; Ranga, F.; Fetea, F.; Dulf, F.V.; Rusu, A.; Trif, M.; Vodnar, D.C. Biodiesel-Derived Glycerol Obtained from Renewable Biomass—a Suitable Substrate for the Growth of Candida Zeylanoides Yeast Strain ATCC 20367. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Garg, M.; Priyanka; Chatterjee, M. Isolation, Characterization and Antibacterial Effect of Biosurfactant from Candida Parapsilosis. Biotechnol. Rep. 2018, 18, e00251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yadav, J.S.S.; Bezawada, J.; Ajila, C.M.; Yan, S.; Tyagi, R.D.; Surampalli, R.Y. Mixed Culture of Kluyveromyces Marxianus and Candida Krusei for Single-Cell Protein Production and Organic Load Removal from Whey. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 164, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Douglass, A.P.; Offei, B.; Braun-Galleani, S.; Coughlan, A.Y.; Martos, A.A.R.; Ortiz-Merino, R.A.; Byrne, K.P.; Wolfe, K.H. RESEARCH ARTICLE Population Genomics Shows No Distinction between Pathogenic Candida Krusei and Environmental Pichia Kudriavzevii: One Species, Four Names. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1007138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Mehlomakulu, N.N.; Setati, M.E.; Divol, B. Characterization of Novel Killer Toxins Secreted by Wine-Related Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts and Their Action on Brettanomyces spp. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 188, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Büyüksırıt Bedir, T.; Kuleaşan, H. A Natural Approach, the Use of Killer Toxin Produced by Metschnikowia Pulcherrima in Fresh Ground Beef Patties for Shelf Life Extention. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 345, 109154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pappas, P.G.; Lionakis, M.S.; Arendrup, M.C.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Kullberg, B.J. Invasive Candidiasis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2018, 4, 18026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jacobsen, I.D.; Niemiec, M.J.; Kapitan, M.; Polke, M. Commensal to Pathogen Transition of Candida Albicans. Encycl. Mycol. 2021, 1, 507–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hurley, D.L.; Fauci, A.S. Disseminated Candidiasis. I. An Experimental Model in the Guinea Pig. J. Infect. Dis. 1975, 131, 516–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Qin, J.; Li, R.; Raes, J.; Arumugam, M.; Burgdorf, S.; Manichanh, C.; Nielsen, T.; Pons, N.; Yamada, T.; Mende, D.R.; et al. A Human Gut Microbial Gene Catalog Established by Metagenomic Sequencing. Nature 2010, 464, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pu, S.; Niu, S.; Zhang, C.; Xu, X.; Qin, M.; Huang, S.; Zhang, L. Epidemiology, Antifungal Susceptibilities, and Risk Factors for Invasive Candidiasis from 2011 to 2013 in a Teaching Hospital in Southwest China. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2017, 50, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Strollo, S.; Lionakis, M.S.; Adjemian, J.; Steiner, C.A.; Prevots, D.R. Epidemiology of Hospitalizations Associated with Invasive Candidiasis, United States, 2002–2012. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gu, Z.Q.; Tseng, K.Y.; Tsai, Y.H. Candida Gut Commensalism and Inflammatory Disease. Med. Microecol. 2020, 3, 100008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Austermeier, S.; Kasper, L.; Westman, J.; Gresnigt, M.S. I Want to Break Free—Macrophage Strategies to Recognize and Kill Candida Albicans, and Fungal Counter-Strategies to Escape. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Silva, S.; Negri, M.; Henriques, M.; Oliveira, R.; Williams, D.W.; Azeredo, J. Candida Glabrata, Candida Parapsilosis and Candida Tropicalis: Biology, Epidemiology, Pathogenicity and Antifungal Resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 288–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Aaron, L.; Torsten, M. Candida Albicans in Celiac Disease: A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing. Autoimmun. Rev. 2020, 19, 102621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bacher, P.; Hohnstein, T.; Beerbaum, E.; Röcker, M.; Blango, M.G.; Kaufmann, S.; Röhmel, J.; Eschenhagen, P.; Grehn, C.; Seidel, K.; et al. Human Anti-Fungal Th17 Immunity and Pathology Rely on Cross-Reactivity against Candida Albicans. Cell 2019, 176, 1340–1355.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Honda, K.; Littman, D.R. The Microbiota in Adaptive Immune Homeostasis and Disease. Nature 2016, 535, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pérez, J.C. Fungi of the Human Gut Microbiota: Roles and Significance. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2021, 311, 151490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Huët, M.A.L.; Lee, C.Z.; Rahman, S. A Review on Association of Fungi with the Development and Progression of Carcinogenesis in the Human Body. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2022, 3, 100090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Musumeci, S.; Coen, M.; Leidi, A.; Schrenzel, J. The Human Gut Mycobiome and the Specific Role of Candida Albicans: Where Do We Stand, as Clinicians? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2022, 28, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Iliev, I.D.; Leonardi, I. Fungal Dysbiosis: Immunity and Interactions at Mucosal Barriers. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 17, 635–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. De Luca, C.; Guglielminetti, M.; Ferrario, A.; Calabrò, M.; Casari, E. Candidemia: Species Involved, Virulence Factors and Antimycotic Susceptibility. New Microbiol. 2012, 35, 459–468. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pfaller, M.; Neofytos, D.; Diekema, D.; Azie, N.; Meier-Kriesche, H.U.; Quan, S.P.; Horn, D. Epidemiology and Outcomes of Candidemia in 3648 Patients: Data from the Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH Alliance®) Registry, 2004-2008. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 74, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hirayama, T.; Miyazaki, T.; Ito, Y.; Wakayama, M.; Shibuya, K.; Yamashita, K.; Takazono, T.; Saijo, T.; Shimamura, S.; Yamamoto, K.; et al. Virulence Assessment of Six Major Pathogenic Candida Species in the Mouse Model of Invasive Candidiasis Caused by Fungal Translocation. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Berg, G.; Rybakova, D.; Fischer, D.; Cernava, T.; Vergès, M.C.C.; Charles, T.; Chen, X.; Cocolin, L.; Eversole, K.; Corral, G.H.; et al. Microbiome Definition Re-Visited: Old Concepts and New Challenges Concepts and New Challenges. Microbiome 2020, 8, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kumar, S.; Bansal, A.; Chakrabarti, A.; Singhi, S. Evaluation of Efficacy of Probiotics in Prevention of Candida Colonization in a PICU-a Randomized Controlled Trial. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 41, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Precup, G.; Teleky, B.E.; Ranga, F.; Vodnar, D.C. Assessment of Physicochemical and Rheological Properties of Xylo-Oligosaccharides and Glucose-Enriched Doughs Fermented with BB-12. Biology 2022, 11, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, H.; Li, X.; Wang, D.; Li, C.; Wang, Y.; Diao, Y.; Tang, Y. Isolation, Identification and Genotyping of Candida Albicans from Landes Geese. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2022, 69, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Idelevich, E.A.; Grunewald, C.M.; Wüllenweber, J.; Becker, K. Rapid Identification and Susceptibility Testing of Candida spp. from Positive Blood Cultures by Combination of Direct MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry and Direct Inoculation of Vitek 2. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e114834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sourav, D.; Shreya, S.; Yamini, T.; Chakrabarti, A.; Rudramurthy, S.; Harsimran, K.; Shamanth, A.S.; Ghosh, A. A Selective Medium for Isolation and Detection of Candida. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 59, e00326-20. [Google Scholar]
  49. Odds, F.C.; Bernaerts, R. CHROMagar Candida, a New Differential Isolation Medium for Presumptive Identification of Clinically Important Candida Species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1994, 32, 1923–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Byadarahally Raju, S.; Rajappa, S. Isolation and Identification of Candida from the Oral Cavity. ISRN Dent. 2011, 2011, 487921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gasparoto, T.H.; Dionísio, T.J.; De Oliveira, C.E.; Porto, V.C.; Gelani, V.; Santos, C.F.; Campanelli, A.P.; Lara, V.S. Isolation of Candida Dubliniensis from Denture Wearers. J. Med. Microbiol. 2009, 58, 959–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bernal, S.; Mazuelos, E.M.; García, M.; Aller, A.I.; Martínez, M.A.; Gutiérrez, M.J. Evaluation of CHROMagar Candida Medium for the Isolation and Presumptive Identification of Species of Candida of Clinical Importance. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1996, 24, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Manfredi, M.; McCullough, M.J.; Al-Karaawi, Z.M.; Hurel, S.J.; Porter, S.R. The Isolation, Identification and Molecular Analysis of Candida spp. Isolated from the Oral Cavities of Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2002, 17, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Welsh, R.M.; Bentz, M.L.; Shams, A.; Houston, H.; Lyons, A.; Rose, L.J.; Litvintseva, P. Survival, Persistence, and Isolation of the Emerging Multidrug-Resistant Pathogenic Yeast Candida Auris on a Plastic Health Care Surface. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 2996–3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Horvath, L.L.; Hospenthal, D.R.; Murray, C.K.; Dooley, D.P. Direct Isolation of Candida spp. from Blood Cultures on the Chromogenic Medium CHROMagar Candida. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 2629–2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Eraso, E.; Moragues, M.D.; Villar-Vidal, M.; Sahand, I.H.; González-Gómez, N.; Pontón, J.; Quindós, G. Evaluation of the New Chromogenic Medium Candida ID 2 for Isolation and Identification of Candida Albicans and Other Medically Important Candida Species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 3340–3345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Darwazeh, A.M.-G.; Sulieman, A.-R.; Al-Mojaiwe, S. Isolation of Candida Species from the Oral Cavity and Fingertips of Complete Denture Wearers. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2001, 86, 420–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nnadi, N.E.; Ayanbimpe, G.M.; Okolo, M.O.; Enweani, I.B.; Criseo, G.; Romeo, O. Isolation and Molecular Characterization of Candida Africana from Jos Nigeria. Med. Mycol. 2012, 50, 765–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Álvarez, M.I.; Suárez, B.L.; Caicedo, L.D. Isolation of Candida Dubliniensis for the First Time in Cali, Colombia, and Its Identification with Phenotyping Methods. Mycopathologia 2009, 167, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lotfali, E.; Mardani, M.; Abolghasemi, S.; Darvishnia, D.; Rabiei, M.M.; Ghasemi, R.; Fattahi, A. Isolation of Candida Africana in Oral Candidiasis: First Report among Cancer Patients in Iran. Curr. Med. Mycol. 2020, 6, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Adjapong, G.; Bartlett, M.; Hale, M.; Garrill, A. The Isolation of Candida Rugosa and Candida Mesorugosa from Clinical Samples in Ghana. Med. Mycol. 2016, 54, 322–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Khan, Z.; Ahmad, S.; Joseph, L.; Al-Obaid, K. Isolation of Cholesterol-Dependent, Multidrug-Resistant Candida Glabrata Strains from Blood Cultures of a Candidemia Patient in Kuwait. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Okulicz, J.F.; Rivard, R.G.; Conger, N.G.; Nguyen, M.X.; Hospenthal, D.R. Primary Isolation of Candida Species from Urine Specimens Using Chromogenic Medium. Mycoses 2008, 51, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Krishnasamy, L.; Krishnakumar, S.; Santharam, P.; Saikumar, C. Isolation and Identification of Candida Species in Patients with Vulvovaginal Candidiasis. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 12, 2269–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Taj-Aldeen, S.J.; Al-Ansari, H.I.; Boekhout, T.; Theelen, B. Co-Isolation of Trichosporon Inkin and Candida Parapsilosis from a Scalp White Piedra Case. Med. Mycol. 2004, 42, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. De Sousa, L.V.N.F.; Santos, V.L.; de Souza Monteiro, A.; Dias-Souza, M.V.; Marques, S.G.; de Faria, E.S.; de O. Assunção, E.A.; dos Santos, S.G.; Zonis, J.M.; de Alvarenga, D.G.; et al. Isolation and Identification of Candida Species in Patients with Orogastric Cancer: Susceptibility to Antifungal Drugs, Attributes of Virulence in Vitro and Immune Response Phenotype. BMC Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sharma, U.; Patel, K.; Shah, V.; Sinha, S.; Rathore, V.P.S. Isolation and Speciation of Candida in Type Ii Diabetic Patients Using Chrom Agar: A Microbial Study. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2017, 11, DC09–DC11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kanna, B.; Kumar, G.; Swapna, M.; Easow, J.M. Isolation and Identification of Candida Species from Various Clinical Samples in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Int. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2017, 5, 3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Alonso-Vargas, R.; Elorduy, L.; Eraso, E.; Cano, J.F.; Guarro, J.; Pontón, J.; Quindós, G. Isolation of Candida Africana, Probable Atypical Strains of Candida Albicans, from a Patient with Vaginitis. Med. Mycol. 2008, 46, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gauch, L.M.R.; Pedrosa, S.S.; Silveira-Gomes, F.; Esteves, R.A.; Marques-da-Silva, S.H. Isolation of Candida spp. from Denture-Related Stomatitis in Pará Brazil. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2018, 49, 148–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pekard-Amenitsch, S.; Schriebl, A.; Posawetz, W.; Willinger, B.; Kölli, B.; Buzina, W. Isolation of Candida Auris from Ear of Otherwise Healthy Patient, Austria, 2018. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2018, 24, 1596–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Carrasco, L.; Ramos, M.; Galisteo, R.; Pisa, D.; Fresno, M.; González, M.E. Isolation of Candida Famata from a Patient with Acute Zonal Occult Outer Retinopathy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 635–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ghajari, A.; Lotfali, E.; Ahmadi, N.A.; Fassihi, P.N.; Shahmohammadi, N.; Ansari, S.; Norouzi, M.; Arab-Mazar, Z. Isolation of Different Species of Candida in Patients with Vulvovaginal Candidiasis from Damavand, Iran. Arch. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 13, e59291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Murray, M.P.; Zinchuk, R.; Larone, D.H. CHROMagar Candida as the Sole Primary Medium for Isolation of Yeasts and as a Source Medium for the Rapid-Assimilation-of-Trehalose Test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 1210–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ghelardi, E.; Pichierri, G.; Castagna, B.; Barnini, S.; Tavanti, A.; Campa, M. Efficacy of Chromogenic Candida Agar for Isolation and Presumptive Identification of Pathogenic Yeast Species. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2008, 14, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Giammanco, G.M.; Melilli, D.; Pizzo, G. Candida Pararugosa Isolation from the Oral Cavity of an Italian Denture Wearer. Res. Microbiol. 2004, 155, 571–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Sharma, K.; Chattopadhyay, U.; Naskar, K. Prevalence of Candida Albicans in Raw Chicken and Mutton Meat Samples Sold in the Open Markets of Kolkata City of West Bengal. Int. J. Livest. Res. 2017, 7, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. De Casia Dos Santos, R.; Marin, J.M. Isolation of Candida spp. from Mastitic Bovine Milk in Brazil. Mycopathologia 2005, 159, 251–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Eldesouky, I.; Mohamed, N.; Khalaf, D.; Salama, A.; Elsify, A.; Ombarak, R.; El-Ballal, S.; Effat, M.; Al Shabrawy, M. Candida Mastitis in Dairy Cattle with Molecular Detection of Candida Albicans. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 2016, 22, 461–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ramin, A.G.; Shoorijeh, S.J.; Ashtiani, H.R.A.; Naderi, M.M.; Behzadi, M.A.; Tamadon, A.; Sofi, A.H.; Wani, S.A.; Salahuddin, M.; Malik, A.H.; et al. Removal of Metallic Objects from Animal Feeds: Development and Studies on a New Machine. VetScan 2008, 3, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  81. Zhai, L.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, Y.; Jin, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Gao, S.; Li, X.; Sun, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Huang, B.; et al. Isolation and Identification of Candida Tropicalis in Sows with Fatal Infection: A Case Report. BMC Vet. Res. 2021, 17, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhang, S.; Zhao, Q.; Xue, W.; Li, Y.; Guo, Y.; Wu, X.; Huo, S.; Li, Y.; Li, C. The Isolation and Identification of Candida Glabrata from Avian Species and a Study of the Antibacterial Activities of Chinese Herbal Medicine in Vitro. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Moretti, A.; Piergili Fioretti, D.; Boncio, L.; Pasquali, P.; Del Rossi, E. Isolation of Candida Rugosa from Turkeys. J. Vet. Med. Ser. B 2000, 47, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Mahmoud, M.; Sulieman, A.M.E.; Elkhalifa, E.A. Isolation Identification and Characterization of Candida Utilis from Some of the Sudanese Traditionally Fermented Food Products Isolation. Gezira J. Eng. Appl. 2015, 4, 104–114. [Google Scholar]
  85. Arora, P.; Singh, P.; Wang, Y.; Yadav, A.; Pawar, K.; Singh, A.; Padmavati, G.; Chowdhary, A.; Xu, J. Environmental Isolation of Candida Auris from the Coastal Wetlands of Andaman Islands, India. mBio 2021, 12, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Cook, W.L.; Schlitzer, R.L. Isolation of Candida Albicans from Freshwater and Sewage. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1981, 41, 840–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Alwaely, W.A.S.; Ghadban, A.K.; Alrubayae, I.M.N. Production and Properties of Biosurfactant from the Local Isolation of Candida spp. Drug Invent. Today 2019, 12, 948–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Patel, M.J.; Tipre, D.R.; Dave, S.R. Isolation and Identification of a Candida Digboiensis Strain from an Extreme Acid Mine Drainage of the Lignite Mine, Gujarat. J. Basic Microbiol. 2009, 49, 564–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wang, L.; Chi, Z.; Wang, X.; Ju, L.; Chi, Z.; Guo, N. Isolation and Characterization of Candida Membranifaciens Subsp. Flavinogenie W14-3, a Novel Riboflavin-Producing Marine Yeast. Microbiol. Res. 2008, 163, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Pinjon, E.; Sullivan, D.; Salkin, I.; Shanley, D.; Coleman, D. Simple, Inexpensive, Reliable Method for Differentiation of Candida Dubliniensis from Candida Albicans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998, 36, 2093–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ibrahim, A.; Peyclit, L.; Abdallah, R.; Khelaifia, S.; Chamieh, A.; Rolain, J.M.; Bittar, F. Sca Medium: A New Culture Medium for the Isolation of All Candida Auris Clades. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sahand, I.H.; Moragues, M.D.; Eraso, E.; Villar-Vidal, M.; Quindós, G.; Pontón, J. Supplementation of CHROMagar Candida Medium with Pal’s Medium for Rapid Identification of Candida Dubliniensis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 5768–5770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Abebe, E.; Gugsa, G.; Ahmed, M. Review on Major Food-Borne Zoonotic Bacterial Pathogens. J. Trop. Med. 2020, 2020, 4674235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Käferstein, F.K. Food Safety: The Fourth Pillar in the Strategy to Prevent Infant Diarrhoea. Bull. World Health Organ. 2003, 81, 842–843. [Google Scholar]
  95. Becher, P.G.; Hagman, A.; Verschut, V.; Chakraborty, A.; Rozpędowska, E.; Lebreton, S.; Bengtsson, M.; Flick, G.; Witzgall, P.; Piškur, J. Chemical Signaling and Insect Attraction Is a Conserved Trait in Yeasts. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 8, 2962–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Vadkertiová, R.; Molnárová, J.; Vránová, D.; Sláviková, E. Yeasts and Yeast-like Organisms Associated with Fruits and Blossoms of Different Fruit Trees. Can. J. Microbiol. 2012, 58, 1344–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Abdelfattah, A.; Freilich, S.; Bartuv, R.; Zhimo, V.Y.; Kumar, A.; Biasi, A.; Salim, S.; Feygenberg, O.; Burchard, E.; Dardick, C.; et al. Global Analysis of the Apple Fruit Microbiome: Are All Apples the Same? Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 23, 6038–6055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Mishra, A.; Gond, S.K.; Kumar, A.; Sharma, V.K.; Verma, S.K.; Kharwar, R.N.; Sieber, T.N. Season and Tissue Type Affect Fungal Endophyte Communities of the Indian Medicinal Plant Tinospora Cordifolia More Strongly than Geographic Location. Microb. Ecol. 2012, 64, 388–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Kumar, A.; Zhimo, Y.; Biasi, A.; Salim, S.; Feygenberg, O.; Wisniewski, M.; Droby, S. Endophytic Microbiome in the Carposphere and Its Importance in Fruit Physiology and Pathology. In Postharvest Pathology; Spadaro, D., Droby, S., Gullino, M.L., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 73–88. ISBN 9783030565305. [Google Scholar]
  100. Madden, A.A.; Epps, M.J.; Fukami, T.; Irwin, R.E.; Sheppard, J.; Sorger, D.M.; Dunn, R.R.; Fukami, T.; Re, I.; Sheppard, J.; et al. The Ecology of Insect—Yeast Relationships and Its Relevance to Human Industry. Proc. R. Soc. B 2018, 285, 20172733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Jones, R.; Fountain, M.T.; Andreani, N.A.; Günther, C.S.; Goddard, M.R. The Relative Abundances of Yeasts Attractive to Drosophila Suzukii Differ between Fruit Types and Are Greatest on Raspberries. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 10382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Arroyo-López, F.N.; Medina, E.; Ruiz-Bellido, M.Á.; Romero-Gil, V.; Montes-Borrego, M.; Landa, B.B. Enhancement of the Knowledge on Fungal Communities in Directly Brined Aloreña de Málaga Green Olive Fermentations by Metabarcoding Analysis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Abdo, H.; Catacchio, C.R.; Ventura, M.; D’Addabbo, P.; Alexandre, H.; Guilloux-Bénatier, M.; Rousseaux, S. The Establishment of a Fungal Consortium in a New Winery. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Palareti, G.; Legnani, C.; Cosmi, B.; Antonucci, E.; Erba, N.; Poli, D.; Testa, S.; Tosetto, A. Comparison between Different D-Dimer Cutoff Values to Assess the Individual Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: Analysis of Results Obtained in the DULCIS Study. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2016, 38, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Sipiczki, M. Candida Zemplinina Sp. Nov., an Osmotolerant and Psychrotolerant Yeast That Ferments Sweet Botrytized Wines. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2003, 53, 2079–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Wang, H.; Hu, Z.; Long, F.; Guo, C.; Yuan, Y.; Yue, T. Detection of Zygosaccharomyces Rouxii and Candida Tropicalis in a High-Sugar Medium by a Metal Oxide Sensor-Based Electronic Nose and Comparison with Test Panel Evaluation. J. Food Prot. 2015, 78, 2052–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. De Medeiros, A.S.S. Fermentation of Fruit Juices by the Osmotolerant Yeast Candida Magnoliae. Master’s Dissertation, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  108. Qi, W.; Zhang, W.T.; Lu, F.P. Carbon Metabolism and Transcriptional Variation in Response to Salt Stress in the Genome Shuffled Candida Versatilis and a Wild-Type Salt Tolerant Yeast Strain. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 1646–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Yu, J.-H.; Lee, D.-H.; Park, Y.-C.; Lee, M.-G.; Kim, D.-O.; Ryu, Y.-W.; Seo, J.-H. Proteomic Analysis of Fructophilic Properties of Osmotolerant Candida Magnoliae. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 18, 248–254. [Google Scholar]
  110. Raymond Eder, M.L.; Rosa, A.L. Genetic, Physiological, and Industrial Aspects of the Fructophilic Non-Saccharomyces Yeast Species, Starmerella Bacillaris. Fermentation 2021, 7, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Viesser, J.A.; de Melo Pereira, G.V.; de Carvalho Neto, D.P.; Rogez, H.; Góes-Neto, A.; Azevedo, V.; Brenig, B.; Aburjaile, F.; Soccol, C.R. Co-Culturing Fructophilic Lactic Acid Bacteria and Yeast Enhanced Sugar Metabolism and Aroma Formation during Cocoa Beans Fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 339, 109015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. De Oliveira Junqueira, A.C.; de Melo Pereira, G.V.; Viesser, J.A.; de Carvalho Neto, D.P.; Querne, L.B.P.; Soccol, C.R. Isolation and Selection of Fructose-Consuming Lactic Acid Bacteria Associated with Coffee Bean Fermentation. Food Biotechnol. 2022, 36, 58–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Rojas, V.; Gil, J.V.; Piñaga, F.; Manzanares, P. Studies on Acetate Ester Production by Non-Saccharomyces Wine Yeasts. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001, 70, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Hazelwood, L.A.; Daran, J.M.; Van Maris, A.J.A.; Pronk, J.T.; Dickinson, J.R. The Ehrlich Pathway for Fusel Alcohol Production: A Century of Research on Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Metabolism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 2259–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Masneuf-Pomarede, I.; Juquin, E.; Miot-Sertier, C.; Renault, P.; Laizet, Y.; Salin, F.; Alexandre, H.; Capozzi, V.; Cocolin, L.; Colonna-Ceccaldi, B.; et al. The Yeast Starmerella Bacillaris (Synonym Candida Zemplinina) Shows High Genetic Diversity in Winemaking Environments. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015, 15, fov045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Jolly, N.P.; Varela, C.; Pretorius, I.S. Not Your Ordinary Yeast: Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts in Wine Production Uncovered. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014, 14, 215–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Borren, E.; Tian, B. The Important Contribution of Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts to the Aroma Complexity of Wine: A Review. Foods 2021, 10, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Gobert, A.; Tourdot-maréchal, R.; Morge, C.; Sparrow, C. Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts Nitrogen Source Preferences: Impact on Sequential Fermentation and Wine Volatile Compounds Profile. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Perpetuini, G.; Rossetti, A.P.; Tittarelli, F.; Battistelli, N.; Arfelli, G.; Suzzi, G.; Tofalo, R. Promoting Candida Zemplinina Adhesion on Oak Chips: A Strategy to Enhance Esters and Glycerol Content of Montepulciano d’Abruzzo Organic Wines. Food Res. Int. 2021, 150, 110772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Tufariello, M.; Capozzi, V.; Spano, G.; Cantele, G.; Venerito, P.; Mita, G.; Grieco, F. Effect of Co-Inoculation of Candida Zemplinina, Saccharomyces Cerevisiae and Lactobacillus Plantarum for the Industrial Production of Negroamaro Wine in Apulia (Southern Italy). Microorganisms 2020, 8, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Mahazar, N.H.; Sufian, N.F.; Meor Hussin, A.S.; Norhayati, H.; Mathawan, M.; Rukayadi, Y. Candida Sp. as a Starter Culture for Cocoa (Theobroma Cacao L.) Beans Fermentation. Int. Food Res. J. 2015, 22, 1783–1787. [Google Scholar]
  122. Bressani, A.P.P.; Martinez, S.J.; de Figueiredo Vilela, L.; Dias, D.R.; Schwan, R.F. Coffee Protein Profiles during Fermentation Using Different Yeast Inoculation Methods. Pesqui. Agropecuária Bras. 2020, 55, e01159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Bressani, A.P.P.; Martinez, S.J.; Sarmento, A.B.I.; Borém, F.M.; Schwan, R.F. Organic Acids Produced during Fermentation and Sensory Perception in Specialty Coffee Using Yeast Starter Culture. Food Res. Int. 2020, 128, 108773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Bressani, A.P.P.; Martinez, S.J.; Evangelista, S.R.; Dias, D.R.; Schwan, R.F. Characteristics of Fermented Coffee Inoculated with Yeast Starter Cultures Using Different Inoculation Methods. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 92, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Sulistyaningtyas, A.R.; Lunggani, A.T.; Kusdiyantini, E. Kefir Produced from Red Rice Milk by Lactobacillus Bulgaricus and Candida Kefir Starter. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 292, 012038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Vasile, M.-A.; Cotârlet, M.; Bahrim, G.-E. Metabolic Functionality of the Synergistically Ameliorated Consortium Based on Wild Kefir Grains and Selected Microorganisms for Bovine Colostrum Fermentation. Innov. Rom. Food Biotechnol. 2020, 19, 33–38. [Google Scholar]
  127. Biagiotti, C.; Ciani, M.; Canonico, L.; Comitini, F. Occurrence and Involvement of Yeast Biota in Ripening of Italian Fossa Cheese. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2018, 244, 1921–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Lanza, B.; Di Marco, S.; Bacceli, M.; Di Serio, M.G.; Di Loreto, G.; Cellini, M.; Simone, N. Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum Used as Single, Multiple, and Mixed Starter Combined with Candida Boidinii for Table Olive Fermentations: Chemical, Textural, and Sensorial Characterization of Final Products. Fermentation 2021, 7, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Purriños, L.; Carballo, J.; Lorenzo, J.M. The Influence of Debaryomyces Hansenii, Candida Deformans and Candida Zeylanoides on the Aroma Formation of Dry-Cured “Lacón”. Meat Sci. 2013, 93, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Zhou, R.Y.; Chua, J.Y.; Liu, S.Q. Exploring the Feasibility of Biotransforming Salted Soy Whey into a Soy Sauce-like Condiment Using Wine Yeast Torulaspora Delbrueckii and Soy Sauce Yeasts Zygosaccharomyces Rouxii and Candida Versatilis as Single Starter Cultures. Food Res. Int. 2022, 156, 111350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Silva, C.F.; Vilela, D.M.; de Souza Cordeiro, C.; Duarte, W.F.; Dias, D.R.; Schwan, R.F. Evaluation of a Potential Starter Culture for Enhance Quality of Coffee Fermentation. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 29, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Hay, R.J. Fungal Infections. Clin. Dermatol. 2006, 24, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Samaranayake, Y.H.; MacFarlane, T.W.; Samaranayake, L.P.; Aitchison, T. The in Vitro Proteolytic and Saccharolytic Activity of Candida Species Cultured in Human Saliva. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 1994, 9, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Segal, E.; Gottlieb, S.; Altboum, Z.; Gov, Y.; Berdicevsky, I. Adhesion of Candida Albicans to Epithelial Cells—Effect of Nikkomycin. Mycoses 1997, 40, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Jin, Y.; Yip, H.K.; Samaranayake, Y.H.; Yau, J.Y.; Samaranayake, L.P. Biofilm-Forming Ability of Candida Albicans Is Unlikely to Contribute to High Levels of Oral Yeast Carriage in Cases of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 2961–2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Naglik, J.R.; Rodgers, C.A.; Shirlaw, P.J.; Dobbie, J.L.; Fernandes-Naglik, L.L.; Greenspan, D.; Agabian, N.; Challacombe, S.J. Differential Expression of Candida Albicans Secreted Aspartyl Proteinase and Phospholipase B Genes in Humans Correlates with Active Oral and Vaginal Infections. J. Infect. Dis. 2003, 188, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Price, M.F.; Wilkinson, A.N.D.; Gentry, L.O. Plate Method for Detection of Propspholipase Acvivity in Candida Albicans. Sabouraudia 1982, 20, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. de Freitas, E.M.; Monteiro, L.C.; da Silva Fernandes, M.B.; Martelli Junior, H.; Bonan, P.R.F.; Nobre, S.A.M. Antifungal Susceptibility in Vitro Determined by the Etest® for Candida Obtained from the Oral Cavity of Irradiated and Elderly Individuals. Braz. Dent. J. 2015, 26, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Mayer, F.L.; Wilson, D.; Hube, B. Candida Albicans Pathogenicity Mechanisms. Virulence 2018, 4, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Yang, H.; Tsang, P.C.S.; Pow, E.H.N.; Lam, O.L.T.; Tsang, P.W.K. Potential Role of Candida Albicans Secreted Aspartic Protease 9 in Serum Induced-Hyphal Formation and Interaction with Oral Epithelial Cells. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 139, 103896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Brieland, J.; Essig, D.; Jackson, C.; Frank, D.; Loebenberg, D.; Menzel, F.; Arnold, B.; DiDomenico, B.; Hare, R. Comparison of Pathogenesis and Host Immune Responses to Candida Glabrata and Candida Albicans in Systemically Infected Immunocompetent Mice. Infect. Immun. 2001, 69, 5046–5055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Candida species dual effect.
Figure 1. Candida species dual effect.
Microorganisms 10 01855 g001
Table 1. Candida species isolation mediums and conditions.
Table 1. Candida species isolation mediums and conditions.
SpeciesIsolation SourceMediumCultivation ConditionsReferences
Clinical Samples
C. dubliniensisDenture wearersSAB and CACRoom temperature[51]
C. albicans, N. (Candida)glabrata, P. (Candida)krusei C. tropicalis, M. (Candida)parapsilosis, C. (Candida) lusitaniae, M. (Candida) guilliermondii, D. (Candida)famata, C. lambica, K. (Candida) zeylanoides, and Candida humicola (teleomorph Vanrija humicola)Clinical samplesSAB and CAC48 h, 37 °C[52]
Candida spp.Human oral cavitiesSAB with chloramphenicol;NI[53]
C. aurisClinical samplesCAC40 °C[54]
Candida spp.Oral cavitySDA and CAC24–48 h, 37 °C[50]
C. dubliniensisDenture stomatitisCandida ID248 h,37 °C[51]
Candida spp.Blood sampleCAC30 °C[55]
C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. tropicalis, and P. (Candida)kruseiClinical samplesCandida ID, Albicans ID 2, CAC10 days, 37 °C[56]
Candida spp.Oral cavitySAB48 h, 37 °C[57]
C. africanaVagina sampleCACNI[58]
C. dubliniensisOral cavityCAC48 h, 30 °C[59]
C. africanaOral candidiasis sampleSAB24 h, 30 °C[60]
C. rugosa (teleomorph Diutina rugosa) and C. mesorugosa (teleomorph Diutina mesorugosa)Clinical samplesSAB and brilliance Candida agarNI[61]
N. (Candida)glabrataBlood samplesBlood agar, chocolate agar, SAB, and MH agarNI[62]
C. albicans, P. (Candida)krusei, C. tropicalis, and N. (Candida)glabrataUrineCAC, McConkey and blood agar48 h, 30–37 °C[63]
Candida spp.VaginaSAB and Hichrome Candida differential agar24–48 h, 37 °C[64]
M. (Candida)parapsilosisScalpSAB with streptomycin, SAB, and BHI with streptomycin and penicillin3 days, 37 °C/room temperature[65]
Candida spp.Clinical samplesSAB with chloramphenicol72 h, 28 °C[66]
C. albicans, N. (Candida)glabrata, C. dubliniensis, P. (Candida)krusei, and M. (Candida) parapsilosiOral cavityCAC 3–4 days, 37 °C[67]
C. albicans, C. tropicalis, P. (Candida)krusei, N. (Candida)glabrata, and C. dubliniensisClinical specimensCAC 24 h, 37 °C[68]
C. africanaVaginaCHROMagar and Candida ID2NI[69]
Candida spp.Denture-related stomatitis patientsSAB7 days, 35 °C[70]
C. aurisHealthy human earCAC, Candida ID, SAB, and malt extract agar48 h, 37 °C[71]
D. (Candida)famataEye infectionYEPD 30 °C[72]
C. albicans, N. (Candida)glabrata and C. kefyr (teleomorph Kluyveromyces marxianus)Vulvovaginal candidiasis patientsSAB with chloramphenicol and cycloheximide48 h, 30 °C[73]
N. (Candida)glabrataBloodCAC, SAB IMA, and MYC48 h/4–7 days, 30–37 °C[74]
C. albicans, C. tropicalis and P. (Candida) kruseiBloodCAC48 h, 37 °C[75]
C. pararugosa (teleomorph Diutina pararugosa)Oral cavitySAB with chloramphenicol and CAC 37/25 °C[76]
Food Samples
M. (Candida)parapsilosisContaminated dairy productsPDB24 h, 37 °C [19]
C. albicansRaw chicken meat and mutton meatSAB 7–10 days, 30 °C[77]
Candida spp.Mastitic bovine milkBlood agar, Mac Conkey agar, and SAB72 h, 37 °C [78]
C. albicansLandes geeseCAC, YPD, TTC-Sha Baoluo, Corn meat agar medium72 h, 35 °C[46]
C. albicansMilkSAB with chloramphenicol and CAC24 h, 37 °C[79]
Candida spp.Mastitic cows and milkersSAB72 h, 37 °C[80]
C. tropicalisInfected sowsSAB and TSA with newborn bovine serum3–5 days, 28/37 °C, respectively[81]
N. (Candida)glabrataAvian speciesSAB48 h, 37 °C[82]
D. (Candida) rugosaTurkeysSAB2 weeks, 27 °C[83]
Environmental Samples
C. auris and N. (Candida) glabrataPlastic health care surfaceSAB; YNB40 °C[54]
C. (Candida) utilisHulu Mur, Kissra, and Marisa (Sudanese traditionally cereal-based fermented foods)YM with rose bengal3 days, 28 °C[84]
C. aurisSediment soil and seawater Coastal wetlands (e.g., rocky shores, sandy beaches, tidal marshes, and mangrove swamps)SAB with chloramphenicol and gentamicin, CAC7 days, 28 °C[85]
C. albicansFresh water and sewageÁgar MacConkey24 h, 22 °C[86]
C. albicans and Y. (Candida) lipolyticaSoil samplesPDA with chloramphenicol, CAC3–5 days, 28 ± 2 °C[87]
C. digboiensisAcid mine drainageGPYE32 ± 2 °C[88]
C. (Candida) membranifaciens subsp. flavinogenie strain W14-3Seawater and sedimentsYPD with chloramphenicol5 days, 20–25 °C[89]
NI-not informed; SAB-sabouraud dextrose; CAC-CHROMagar Candida; MH-Mueller Hinton; YEPD-yeast extract peptone dextrose; IMA-inhibitory mold agar; MYC-Mycosel; PDB-potato dextrose broth; PDA-potato dextrose agar; YPD-yeast peptone glucose; TSA-tryptic soy agar; YNB-yeast nitrogen base; YM agar-extract-malt extract agar; GPYE-glucose peptone yeast extract.
Table 2. Selected Candida starter cultures, isolation source, and impacts over the sensorial and functional aspects of economically relevant fermented foods and beverages.
Table 2. Selected Candida starter cultures, isolation source, and impacts over the sensorial and functional aspects of economically relevant fermented foods and beverages.
Fermented ProductStarter CultureIsolation SourceDesirable Traits/
Inoculation Effects
References
WineS. (Candida) zemplininaGrapefruits and mustsDominance observed during sequential inoculation with S. cerevisiae.
Higher aroma complexity during co-inoculation (↑↑ production of aliphatic alcohols and free terpenes);
[1]
Organic wine mustSynergism when co-inoculated with S. cerevisiae.
↑↑ quantitative and qualitative content of esters
[119]
Spontaneous wine fermentation↓↓ concentration of residual sugar at the end of fermentation.
↑↑ glycerol production on trials containing the S. (Candida) zemplinina;
Improvement of fruity and floral sensory notes when co-inoculated with S. cerevisiae and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
[120]
C. railenensisVineyardsDecrease in ethyl and acetate esters production.
Higher production of glycerol, acetate, free terpenes, and norisoprenoids
[2]
W. (Candida) pulcherrinaSpontaneous wine fermentationSlow rate of sugar consumption.
↑ production of ethyl acetate in comparison to pure S. cerevisae wine fermentation
[3]
CocoaC. nitrativoransSpontaneous cocoa beans fermentationNatural adaptation to the cocoa fermentative process.
Superior sugar metabolism.
Killer phenotype trait.
↑↑ polygalacturonic and pectin lyase production
[4]
C. parapsilosisUniformity of well-fermented seeds (>95%);
Lower acidity of the cotyledon in comparison to other inoculums.
↑↑ residual sugar at the end of fermentation.
↑ free amino acids content inside the cotyledon
[5]
Candida sp.NIGrowth inhibition of pathogenic microorganisms.
No significant alterations on cocoa quality parameters
[121]
CoffeeM. (Candida) parapsilosisCoffee fruits↑ proteolytic activity during semi-dry processing.
Final beverage with prevalence of caramel- and fruity-like flavor, and dense body.
Highest number of aroma-active compounds in semi-dry processing
[122,123,124]
KefirK. (Candida) kefyrNI↑↑ proteolytic activity.
Decrease on total fat content.
↑↑ residual sugar at the end of fermentation;
[125]
Bovine colostrumY. (Candida) lipolyticaNIIncreased antioxidant and antibacterial activity.
Inhibition of Aspergillus niger sporulation
[126]
CheeseK. (Candida) zeylanoides and H. (Candida). homilentomaSpontaneous Italian Fossa cheeseLower contamination by molds.
↑↑ sensorial attributes in comparison to spontaneous fermentation
[127]
Table oliveC. boidiniiLeucocarpa cv. olives brineAlteration of color parameters.
↑↑ enzymatic activity, resulting in the texture loss of the fermented olives.
↓↓ acidification of the brine and presence of spoilage microorganisms at the end of the fermentation
[128]
MeatC. deformans and K. (Candida) zeylanoidesNative dry-cured lacónLower production of flavor- and odor-active compounds associated to dry-cured meat[129]
BeerC. tropicalisTraditional sub-Saharan sorghum beer↑↑ growth rate and cell concentration in comparison to S. cerevisiae.
Lower glucose consumption rate.
↑ production of lactic acid in the final product.
High viability rate in superior concentrations of ethanol
[6]
Soy sauce-like condimentW. (Candida) versatilisNISuperior osmotic tolerance and growth rate at 10% NaCl soy whey medium.
Superior acidification of the final product.
↑↑ residual sugar at the end of fermentation.
↑↑ contribution to umami taste
Production of volatile compounds associated with desirable flavor in soy sauce
[130]
NI-not informed; ↑: higher; ↑↑: much higher; ↓↓: much lower.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Melo Pereira, G.V.; Maske, B.L.; de Carvalho Neto, D.P.; Karp, S.G.; De Dea Lindner, J.; Martin, J.G.P.; de Oliveira Hosken, B.; Soccol, C.R. What Is Candida Doing in My Food? A Review and Safety Alert on Its Use as Starter Cultures in Fermented Foods. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1855. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091855

AMA Style

de Melo Pereira GV, Maske BL, de Carvalho Neto DP, Karp SG, De Dea Lindner J, Martin JGP, de Oliveira Hosken B, Soccol CR. What Is Candida Doing in My Food? A Review and Safety Alert on Its Use as Starter Cultures in Fermented Foods. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(9):1855. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091855

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Melo Pereira, Gilberto Vinícius, Bruna Leal Maske, Dão Pedro de Carvalho Neto, Susan Grace Karp, Juliano De Dea Lindner, José Guilherme Prado Martin, Bianca de Oliveira Hosken, and Carlos Ricardo Soccol. 2022. "What Is Candida Doing in My Food? A Review and Safety Alert on Its Use as Starter Cultures in Fermented Foods" Microorganisms 10, no. 9: 1855. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091855

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop