Next Article in Journal
Clinical Pathology, Immunopathology and Advanced Vaccine Technology in Bovine Theileriosis: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of the Pathogenic Potential of Campylobacter jejuni, C. upsaliensis and C. helveticus and Limitations of Using Larvae of Galleria mellonella as an Infection Model
Previous Article in Journal
Glycoprotein- and Lectin-Based Approaches for Detection of Pathogens
Previous Article in Special Issue
Campylobacter jejuni from Canine and Bovine Cases of Campylobacteriosis Express High Antimicrobial Resistance Rates against (Fluoro)quinolones and Tetracyclines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Occurrence of Campylobacter jejuni in Gulls Feeding on Zagreb Rubbish Tip, Croatia; Their Diversity and Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Perspective with Human and Broiler Isolates

1
Croatian Veterinary Institute, Poultry Centre, Laboratory for Bacteriology, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
Croatian Veterinary Institute, Department for Bacteriology and Parasitology, Laboratory for Bacterial Zoonoses and Molecular Diagnostics of Bacterial Diseases, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
3
Croatian Veterinary Institute, Department for Bacteriology and Parasitology, Laboratory for General Bacteriology and Mycology, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
4
Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
5
Croatian Veterinary Institute, Department for Veterinary Public Health, Laboratory for Food Microbiology, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2020, 9(9), 695; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9090695
Submission received: 30 June 2020 / Revised: 13 August 2020 / Accepted: 20 August 2020 / Published: 24 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Campylobacter Infections)

Abstract

:
Campylobacteriosis is the most common gastrointestinal bacterial disease in the European Union (EU). Wild birds are one of the natural reservoirs of these pathogens. In this study we tested cloacal swabs of 643 gulls captured on rubbish tip in Zagreb, Croatia for the presence of Campylobacter spp. and found 168 Campylobacter positive samples. We used multilocus sequence typing (MLST) to genotype 62 random C. jejuni isolates from gulls, 24 isolates from broiler caeca, 27 isolates from broiler neck skins and 23 human isolates. Altogether, we identified 44 different STs, from which 19 were newly described. Most of the new STs (14) originate from gulls. Although humans and broilers share the majority of STs and isolates from gulls are separated from these, there was one ST present in all three hosts: 45. Additionally antimicrobial susceptibility to six antimicrobials was performed on 123 C. jejuni strains isolated from broiler caeca (n = 22), neck skins of broilers (n = 20), gulls cloacal swabs (n = 50) and human faeces (n = 31) by the broth microdilution method. Results show lower resistance of gull isolates to NAL and CIP, while resistance to TET was as high as in human and broiler isolates.

1. Introduction

Campylobacter is the most commonly reported gastrointestinal bacterial pathogen in humans in the European Union (EU), and it has been so since 2005 [1].
A variety of animals constitute a natural reservoir for these bacteria, including domestic animals: cats, dogs, cows, pigs, poultry, and wild birds, with the avian reservoir being the most important [2]. As studies documenting C. jejuni prevalence in wild animals have increased rapidly in the past 15 years [3,4,5,6], many of them showed that diverse groups of wild birds harbour this species [7]. In the last decades, there has been an increase in the incidence of campylobacteriosis worldwide [1,2,8,9]. This zoonosis is therefore of great economic and public concern [10].
The emergence of antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter isolates (of both human and animal origin) has increased dramatically in all groups of antimicrobials, particularly focusing on high resistance rates to the group of fluoroquinolones, which have rapidly increased in the past decade. Monitoring the progress of all of the stated facts indicates we are dealing with a severe public health issue due to antimicrobial resistance that in recent years has become a major public health concern in countries regardless to their national income [11,12].
Gulls are one of the most common birds in human surroundings. They are present in most aquatic habitats and from sea coasts and ports to lakes and rivers. In recent decades, wherever and whenever there was no separation of organic component of household garbage, they found an endless source of food on open rubbish tips [13,14]. Many of them gather on rubbish tips near bigger towns. During our previous research, we got an insight into their movements trough different ringing programs [15,16] and gulls that feed in winter on Zagreb city rubbish tip origin from all over Europe. As gulls are capable of crossing great distances in short periods, and tend to form huge flocks of individuals of different species from different populations and age groups on adequate feeding sites; they can easily transmit and spread pathogens on huge areas and therefore can potentially pose a serious threat to both humans and farm animals.
In this paper we present the molecular study of C. jejuni isolates from gulls, poultry and humans using multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and differences in antimicrobial resistance between isolates from different hosts found in Croatia.

2. Results

2.1. MLST

A total of 643 gulls of five species (Yellow-legged Gull, Larus michahellis (n = 235); Black-headed Gull, L. ridibundus (n = 376); Caspian Gull, L. cachinanns (n = 14), Herring Gull, L. argentatus (n = 2) and Common Gull, L. canus (n = 16)) were captured during winter months (November–March) in the period between November 2016 and March 2020 on Zagreb city rubbish tip. Cloacal swabs were taken from all the birds in order to study occurrence of C. jejuni.
There were 168 swabs positive for the presence of Campylobacter spp. (26.1%). Highest isolation rate was from Black-headed Gulls (118 or 31.4%), followed by Caspian (3 or 21.4%), Common (3 or 18.8%) and Yellow-legged Gulls (44 or 18.7%). The most prevalent Campylobacter species was C. jejuni (148 or 88.1%) followed by C. lari (19 or 11.3%) and C. coli (1 or 0.6%).
MLST was performed on 136 C. jejuni isolates originating from gulls, broiler caeca, broiler neck skins and human feces. All isolates gave full sequence type (ST) profiles. In this study 19 new ST profiles were identified as follows: 14 from gulls (9446, 9447, 9458, 9845, 9846, 9847, 9850, 9851, 9852, 9853, 9854, 9855, 9856 and 10,297), three from broiler neck skins (10,230, 10,231 and 10,232) and two from broiler caeca (10,228 and 10,229). In addition, four new alleles were described: two pgm from gulls (1007 and 1008), one glyA from broiler caeca (832) and one glnA from broiler neck skins (747) (Table 1).
In total, we identified 44 different sequence types (STs) belonging to 18 clonal complexes (CCs) and 15 singletones (STs not belonging to any CCs). Gulls have shown greater diversity in number of STs and isolates from broiler neck skins in number of CCs (Table 1).
The most frequent CCs were ST-1275 (found exclusively in gulls) and ST-21 (found in other three hosts).

2.2. AMR

Distribution of MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) values among C. jejuni strains isolated from broiler caecum, neck skins of broilers, gulls’ cloacal swabs and human faeces are shown in Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5, while MIC50/MIC90 values are shown in Table 6.
According to antibiotic susceptibility testing by the broth microdilution method, all C. jejuni strains isolated from broiler caecum, broiler neck skins and human faeces were found to be susceptible to ERY and GEN. C. jejuni strains isolated from gull cloacal swabs were also found to be susceptible to ERY, while 2.0% of isolates from gull cloacal swabs were found to be resistant to GEN. Very high resistance of C. jejuni isolates from broiler caecum and broiler neck skins to CIP and NAL (90.9% and 90.0%) was found. High resistance to CIP and NAL was also observed in human C. jejuni isolates (74.2% and 80.6%). A high proportion of isolates were resistant to TET (40.9% broiler caecum, 45.0% broiler neck skins, 46.0% gull cloacal swabs and 38.7% human faeces). Resistance to STR of C. jejuni isolates from broiler caecum, broiler neck skins, human faeces and gull cloacal swabs was 4.5%, 5.0%, 9.7% and 8.0%, respectively.
The lowest MIC50 values (≤0.5–2 mg/L) were obtained for the ERY, TET, GEN and STR while low MIC90 values (≤1–0.5 mg/L) were observed for ERY and GEN (with the exception of isolates from gull cloacal swabs; ERY = 2 mg/L).
The highest MIC90 values were observed for TET, CIP and NAL.

3. Discussion

Although the overall prevalence of C. jejuni in our study is a bit smaller than the mean one found in literature [7], seasonality should be taken in consideration. Broman et al. [17] found that the prevalence of C. jejuni in Black-headed Gulls is much higher in autumn (37.6–59.6%) than in winter (7.0–21.6%), and our results are in the higher end of their winter values.
ST-1275 was the only CC found in all gull species (except for Herring Gull, where we did not isolate any Campylobacter spp., probably due to the small number of examined samples (two birds)), with 39 isolates from 16 STs. It was not found in broiler or human isolates. This CC is usually associated with wild birds mainly from family Laridae [18,19]. This is in line with our findings, as STs from ST-1275 CC were the same ones found in other gull species, like Black-headed Gulls from Sweden (1223, 1268, 1275, 1341), Silver Gulls from Australia (3049), the American Herring Gull from the USA (1268), the Ring-billed Gull from the USA (637, 1275), gull (species not written) from Canada (1275) or seagull (species not written) from Spain (9239). The second largest group was singletons (n = 15) (STs not matching any CCs). Most of the singletons were found on gulls exclusively, while only two were found in broiler samples. Those found in gull samples during this study are usually also found on gulls (2351 and 2654), other wild birds (2654, 9209, 9220 and 9221) or environmental waters (5053). Unfortunately, in PubMLST it is not always listed the exact species or even genus of wild bird from which the strains are isolated. This data would give us a better picture about species preferences for each ST especially as they are linked to gulls from all over the world, from Australia, New Zealand, China, USA, Canada, Sweden, etc. Similar case is described in Blackbirds from Sweden, Australia and Azores that share same CCs although separated for hundreds of generations and not connected with migration routes [20].
In humans most common CCs were ST-354 (7 isolates of 1 ST) and ST-21 (5 isolates of 3 STs). In broilers, there is an almost complete overlap between isolates from caeca and neck skins, so we analysed those two groups as a single. The most common CCs were ST-21 (18 isolates from 4 STs) and ST-354 (6 isolate of 1 ST). It is interesting that none of these two CCs were identified in smaller scale MLST study done on chicken meat in Croatia by Mikulić et al. [21]. As suggested in previous studies, humans and chicken share a great part of C. jejuni STs and CCs (Figure 1.). This relationship is visible in minimum spanning tree (Figure 1) where most of the broiler and human isolates are close together sharing same CCs and are distant from gull’s isolates. Out of 14 different CCs found in broilers and humans, six were found in both hosts, while 5 and 3 were found in broilers and humans alone, respectively.
In this study we found only one ST (also only one CC) shared by all three host types and it is 45 (ST-45). Together with ST-21, ST-45 is in the group of most common STs found between human isolates [22,23,24]. It is known that ST 45 can be found in many species of wild birds, like passerines, pigeons, geese, owls, rails etc. [18,20,25]. As gulls sampling for this study was done on rubbish tip where gulls find endless source of food in human leftovers, we believe that this infection started from humans and/or chicken, rather than the other way around, but there is more research to be done (especially whole genome sequencing) to get better insight.
In the present study, we investigated the in vitro susceptibility of 123 C. jejuni strains isolated from broiler caeca (n = 22), neck skins of broilers (n = 20), gulls’ cloacal swabs (n = 50) and human faeces (n = 31) by the broth microdilution method to six antimicrobials.
Results obtained in our study showed very high resistance of C. jejuni isolates from broilers and humans to fluoroquinolones (74.2–90.9%) and tetracycline (38.7–45.0%). High resistance rates to CIP, NAL and TET in broilers and humans was reported from the majority of EU countries [26]. As previously established, an overuse of antimicrobial agents in the poultry, which is the main reservoir of Campylobacter spp., takes responsibility for the alarming rate of AMR to fluoroquinolones [27]. In JIACRA report [28], it was stated that there is statistically-significant positive associations between the consumption of fluoroquinolones and tetracyclines in food-producing animals and resistance to fluoroquinolones and tetracyclines in C. jejuni from such animals. Furthermore, it is mentioned that statistically-significant associations were observed between the occurrence of resistance to fluoroquinolones and tetracyclines in C. jejuni from food-producing animals and the occurrence of resistance in C. jejuni from human infections. Those observations, regarding fluoroquinolones resistance, could be supported by the fact that we found moderate resistance to CIP and NAL in C. jejuni isolates from gull (34.0% and 32.0%), i.e., in wild birds that have not been given or treated with antimicrobials. Quite opposite, high resistance to TET in C. jejuni isolates from gull (46.0%) cannot be explained by this report, nor with the results reported earlier in studies of C. jejuni isolated from gulls and wild birds [19,29,30,31].
In present study, resistance to erythromycin and gentamicin was not detected for C. jejuni isolated from broilers and humans. In addition, low resistance rate in broiler and human isolates was found to streptomycin (4.5–9.7%). These results are similar to those published earlier [26,32].
Regarding C. jejuni isolates from gull, all isolates were found to be susceptible to erythromycin, while only one isolate (2.0%) was found to be resistant to gentamicin. Four isolates (8.0%) were resistant to streptomycin. This is concordance with previous publications [19,25,31].

4. Materials and Methods

In the period between November 2016 and March 2020 gulls were captured using cannon net on Zagreb city rubbish tip (45.765 N 16.025 E) in order to collect cloacal swabs.
Taken swab samples were tested for the presence of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. according to the EN ISO 10272-1 method.
Isolates from broilers (Gallus gallus chicks bred for meat production) were collected at the Laboratories of the Croatian Veterinary Institute during the implementation of national monitoring programs for Campylobacter in broilers(according to amendment of Regulation (EC) 2073/2005 to include Campylobacter process hygiene criterion [33]; Regulation (EC) No 2160/2003 [34]), while human isolates were collected in the Infectious Diseases Clinic “Dr. Fran Mihaljević” from gastroenteritis patients, all during 2019 and 2020.
Bacterial DNA was extracted from fresh bacterial culture by boiling for 20 min at 95 °C and centrifuging at 14,000× g for 60 s. Species determination was performed using multiplex PCR [35]. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed on 62 randomly chosen C. jejuni isolates from gulls. In addition, MLST was performed on 24 isolates from broiler caeca, 27 isolates from broiler neck skins and 23 human isolates. PCR products were sequenced at Macrogen Europe (The Netherlands).
Sequences were edited using BioEdit software. Sequence types (ST) and clonal complexes (CC) were determined using Campylobacter multilocus sequence typing website (https://pubmlst.org/campylobacter/) sited at the University of Oxford [36].
Minimum spanning tree was done using BioNumerics 7.6.3 version (BioMerieux, Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). We used advanced cluster analysis. The maximum number of n-locus variants was 5, where n = 1 locus variants have the highest weight (10,000), n = 2 have 1 000 times smaller (10) and all others 10 times smaller (1).
Antimicrobial resistance of 123 C. jejuni isolates isolated from broiler caecum (n = 22), neck skins of broilers (n = 20), gulls’ cloacal swabs (n = 50) and human faeces (n = 31) was tested. The antimicrobial susceptibility testing was determined by the broth microdilution method for six antimicrobials, following EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) guidelines [37]. EUCAMP2 microplate (Sensititer, Trek Diagnostic Systems Ltd. East Grinstead, West Sussex, RH19 1XZ, UK) was used for the susceptibility testing of erythromycin (ERY; 1–128 mg/L), ciprofloxacin (CIP; 0.12–16 mg/L), tetracycline (TET; 0.5–64 mg/L), gentamicin (GEN; 0.12–16 mg/L), nalidixic acid (NAL; 1–64 mg/L) and streptomycin (STR; 0.25–16 mg/L). Before susceptibility testing, isolates were revived on blood agar supplemented with 5% of defibrinated sheep blood (blood agar base no. 2, Merck; 5% DSB, BIOGNOST, Zagreb) and incubated in microaerobic atmosphere (CampyGen, Thermo Scientific) at 42 °C for 24 h.
EUCASTepidemiological cut-off values were used for interpretative thresholds for resistance.
MIC50 and MIC90 levels were defined as the lowest concentration of the antibiotic at which 50% and 90% of the isolates were inhibited, respectively.
Reference strains C. jejuni ATCC 33,560 was used to ensure that the results were within acceptable limits of quality control for susceptibility testing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and sampling L.J. analysis, L.J., B.Š., F.K., G.K., A.H., S.D., M.M.; writing—original draft, L.J., G.K., A.H., S.Š. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Croatian Veterinary Institute and ZGOS Ltd.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Jaki Dečki ringing group for catching gulls.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. EFSA; ECDC. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2017. EFSA J. 2018, 16, 10–22. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kaakoush, N.O.; Castano-Rodriguez, N.; Mitchell, H.M.; Man, S.M. Global epidemiology of Campylobacter infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 28, 687–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Benskin, C.M.H.; Wilson, K.; Jones, K.; Hartley, I.R. Bacterial pathogens in wild birds: A review of the frequency and effects of infections. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2009, 84, 349–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Colles, F.M.; Dingle, K.E.; Cody, A.J.; Maiden, M.C.J. Comparison of Campylobacter population in wild geese with those in starlings and freerange poultry of the same farm. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 74, 3583–3590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Colles, F.M.; Ali, J.S.; Sheppard, S.K.; McCarthy, N.D.; Maiden, M.C.J. Campylobacter populations in wild and domesticated Mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2011, 3, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Waldenstrom, J.; Broman, T.; Carlsson, I.; Hasselquit, D.; Achterberg, R.P.; Wagenaar, J.A.; Olsen, B. Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter lari, and Campylobacter coli in different ecological guilds and taxa of migrating birds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 5911–5917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Waldenstrom, J.; Greikspoor, P. Ecology and host association in Campylobacter in wild birds. In Campylobacter Ecology and Evolution; Sheppard, S.K., Ed.; Caister Academic Press: Norfolk, UK, 2014; pp. 265–284. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cody, A.J.; Mccharthy, N.M.; Wimalaratha, H.L.; Colles, F.M.; Clark, L.; Bowler, I.; Maiden, M.; Dingle, K. A longitudinal 6-year study of the molecular epidemiology of clinical isolates in Oxfordshire UK. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 3196–3201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tack, D.M.; Marder, E.P.; Griffin, P.M.; Hurd, S.; Dunn, J.; Jervis, R.; Lathrop, S.; Muse, A.L.; Ryan, P.; Smith, K.; et al. Preliminary incidence and trends of infections with pathogens transmitted commonly through food-Foodborne diseases active surveillance network, 10 U.S. sites, 2015–2018. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2019, 68, 369–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Havelaar, A.H.; Kirk, M.D.; Torgerson, P.R.; Gibb, H.J.; Hald, T.; Lake, R.J.; Praet, N.; Bellinger, D.; de Silva, N.; Gargouri, N.; et al. World health organization global estimates and regional comparisons of the burden of foodborne disease in 2010. PLoS Med. 2015, 12, e1001923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Isenbarger, D.W.; Hoge, C.W.; Srijan, A.; Pitarangsi, C.; Vithayasai, N.; Bodhidatta, L.; Hickey, K.W.; Cam, P.D. Comparative antibiotic resistance in diarrheal pathogens from Vietnam and Thailand, 1996–1999. Emerg. Infec. Dis. 2002, 8, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nachamkin, I.; Ung, H.; Li, M. Increasing fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni, Pennsylvania, USA, 1982–2001. Emerg. Infec. Dis. 2002, 12, 1501–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Duhem, C.; Vidal, E.; Legrand, J.; Tatoni, T. Opportunistic feeding responses of the yellow-legged gull Larus michahellis to accessibility of refuse dumps: The gulls adjust their diet composition and diversity according to refuse dump accessibility. Bird Study 2003, 50, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ramos, R.; Ramirez, F.; Sanpera, C.; Jover, L.; Ruiz, X. Diet of yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis) chicks along the Spanish Western Mediterranean coast: The relevance of refuse dumps. J. Ornithol. 2009, 150, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jurinović, L.; Kralj, J. Dinamika brojnosti i kretanja galebova (Laridae, Aves) koji se hrane na odlagalištu otpada Prudinec, Zagreb. In XII Međunarodni Simpozij Gospodarenja Otpadom; Anić Vučinić, A., Ed.; Geotehnički Fakultet: Zagreb, Croatia, 2012; pp. 84–85. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kralj, J. Galeb klaukavac, Larus cachinnans michahellis. In Atlas Selidbe Ptica Hrvatske; Kralj, J., Barišić, S., Ćiković, D., Tutiš, V., Eds.; Hrvatska Akademija Znanosti i Umjetnosti: Zagreb, Croatia, 2013; p. 109. [Google Scholar]
  17. Broman, T.; Palmgren, H.; Bergström, S.; Sellin, M.; Waldenström, J.; Danielsson-Tham, M.; Olsen, B. Campylobacter jejuni in Black-Headed Gulls (Larus ridibundus): Prevalence, genotypes, and influence on C. jejuni epidemiology. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 40, 4594–4602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Keller, J.I.; Shriver, W.G. Prevalence of three Campylobacter species, C. jejuni, C. coli, and C. lari, using multi locus sequence typing in wild birds of the mid-atlantic region, USA. J. Wildl. Dis. 2014, 50, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Iglesias-Torrens, Y.; Miró, E.; Guirado, P.; Llovet, T.; Muñoz, C.; Cerdà-Cuéllar, M.; Madrid, C.; Balsalobre, C.; Navarro, F. Population Structure, antimicrobial resistance, and virulence-associated genes in Campylobacter jejuni isolated from three ecological niches: Gastroenteritis patients, broilers, and wild birds. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Griekspoor, P.; Hansbro, P.M.; Waldenström, J.; Olsen, B. Campylobacter jejuni sequence types show remarkable spatial and temporal stability in Blackbirds. Infect. Ecol. Epidemiol. 2015, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mikulić, M.; Humski, A.; Njari, B.; Ostović, M.; Duvnjak, S.; Cvetnić, Ž. Prevalence of thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. in chicken meat in Croatia and multilocus sequence typing of a small subset of Camplobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates. Food Techol. Biotechnol. 2016, 54, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lévesque, S.; Frost, E.; Arbeit, R.D.; Michaud, S. Multilocus sequence typing of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from humans, chickens, raw milk, and environmental water in Quebec, Canada. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 3404–3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Ramonaite, S.; Tamuleviciene, E.; Alter, T.; Kasnauskyte, N.; Malakauskas, M. MLST genotypes of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from broiler products, dairy cattle and human Campylobacteriosis cases in Lithuania. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cody, A.J.; McCarthy, N.D.; Bray, J.E.; Wimalarathna, H.; Colles, F.; Jasen van Rensburg, M.; Dingle, K.; Wandelstrom, J.; Maiden, M. Wild bird-associated Campylobacter jejuni isolates are a consistent source of human disease, in Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2015, 7, 782–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Marotta, F.; Garofolo, G.; di Marcantonio, L.; Di Serafino, G.; Neri, D.; Romantini, R.; Sacchini, L.; Alessiani, A.; di Donato, G.; Nuvoloni, R.; et al. Antimicrobial resistance genotypes and phenotypes of Campylobacter jejuni isolated in Italy from humans, birds from wild and urban habitats, and poultry. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0223804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. EFSA & ECDC. The European Union summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2017/2018. EFSA J. 2020, 18, 6007. [Google Scholar]
  27. Marshall, B.M.; Levy, S.B. Food animals and antimicrobials: Impacts on human health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 718–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. ECDC/EFSA/EMA second joint report on the integrated analysis of the consumption of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from humans and food-producing animals, joint interagency antimicrobial consumption and resistance analysis (JIACRA) Report. EFSA J. 2017, 15, 4872.
  29. Aksomaitiene, J.; Ramonaite, S.; Tamuleviciene, E.; Novoslavskij, A.; Alter, T.; Malakauskas, M. Overlap of antibiotic resistant Campylobacter jejuni MLST genotypes isolated from humans, broiler products, dairy cattle and wild birds in Lithuania. Front Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Migura-Garcia, L.; Ramos, R.; Cerdà-Cuéllar, M. Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars and Campylobacter spp. isolated from an opportunistic gull species, yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis). J. Wildl. Dis. 2017, 53, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Olkkola, S.; Nykasenoja, S.; Raulo, S.; Llarena, A.K.; Kovanen, S.; Kivisto, R.; Myllyniemi, A.; Hanninen, M. Antimicrobial resistance and multilocus sequence types of Finnish Campylobacter jejuni isolates from multiple sources. Zoonoses Publ. Health 2016, 63, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Elhadidy, M.; Ali, M.M.; El-Shibiny, A.; Miller, W.G.; Elkhatib, W.F.; Botteldoorn, N.; Dierick, K. Antimicrobial resistance patterns and molecular resistance markers of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from human diarrheal cases. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on Microbiological Criteria For Foodstuffs, Consolidated Version. Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2005/2073/oj (accessed on 25 June 2020).
  34. Commission Regulation (EC) No 2160/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the Control of Salmonella and Other Specified Food-Borne Zoonotic Agents Consolidated Version. Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2003/2160/oj (accessed on 25 June 2020).
  35. Wang, G.; Clark, C.G.; Taylor, T.M.; Pucknell, C.; Barton, C.; Price, L.; Woodward, D.L.; Rodgers, F.G. Colony multiplex PCR assay for identification and differentiation of Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, C. upsaliensis, and C. fetus subsp. fetus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 4744–4747. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jolley, K.A.; Bray, J.E.; Maiden, M.C.J. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res. 2018, 3, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters. Version 9.0. 2019. Available online: http://www.eucast.org (accessed on 25 June 2020).
Figure 1. Minimum spanning tree of C. jejuni isolates. Isolates are labeled according to the clonal complex they belong to. Differences between samples are expressed as the number of allele differences between them (number of locus variants). In addition, a thicker solid line corresponds to 1 locus variants; a thicker dotted line corresponds to 2 locus variants; thinner solid line corresponds to 3 locus variants; a thinner dashed line corresponds to 4 locus variant and a thinner dotted line corresponds to 5 locus variants.
Figure 1. Minimum spanning tree of C. jejuni isolates. Isolates are labeled according to the clonal complex they belong to. Differences between samples are expressed as the number of allele differences between them (number of locus variants). In addition, a thicker solid line corresponds to 1 locus variants; a thicker dotted line corresponds to 2 locus variants; thinner solid line corresponds to 3 locus variants; a thinner dashed line corresponds to 4 locus variant and a thinner dotted line corresponds to 5 locus variants.
Pathogens 09 00695 g001
Table 1. List of sequence types (ST) and clonal complexes (CC) found in three different host types (gulls, broilers and humans) in Croatia. New STs and alleles are printed bold.
Table 1. List of sequence types (ST) and clonal complexes (CC) found in three different host types (gulls, broilers and humans) in Croatia. New STs and alleles are printed bold.
CCSTaspAglnAgltAglyApgmtktuncALarus ridibundusLarus michahellisLarus cachinnansLarus canusBroiler CaecaBroiler Neck SkinsHuman
st-127563710332249438231721 10
12232733224943931611 8
1268273322494320311 1
1275273322494382314 4
134110332249439312 2
304927339549439312 2
3629228332249438231 1 1
411910332264382312 2
9239273322499259311 1
944610332249101931 1 1
94471033229743931 1 1
9846273322491161047 1 1
9847103322491158231 1 1
985210312249438231 1 1
98552733224910079312 2
98561033224910088231 1 1
st-133213322129285825584 4
st-103410,297215449225231 1
st-95298506422789811686161 1
ST-5743059532101133 22
ST-464464242221031 112
ST-46046024302289596 1 1
10,2302424420211596 1 1
ST-44610,2324774751011618 1 1
ST-4435171721523312 2136
10,22971721526312 1 1
10,2317917233723212 1 1
ST-3543548102211126 42713
ST-3533561417521136 11 2
203671752101136 2 2
ST-25725792462456 11
36722462456 11
82492221156 12 3
ST-20657262452215 11
ST-5220669105102236 1 1
21009252102238 11 2
ST-48475241419625 11
ST-4545471041711 113
ST-2210,228136832333 1 1
ST-21192153215 11 2
5021123215 2125
82221793215 112
88321723215 1 1
61752151060815 57214
UND88191752101031 21 3
1080102107137120761 1 1
1970372975481265231 1
2133552127111373 1 1
235110316312910145491 1
2654103195268101134121 3
50531295624724001472 2
92091031633841019492 2
9220487280547572061 1
92211786344739472261 1
945821595481325231 1
984571722149936931 1 1
9851108346397311 1
98531172269621163771471 1
9854108226392031 1
481031242723136
Table 2. Distribution of MIC values among C. jejuni isolates from broiler caecum.
Table 2. Distribution of MIC values among C. jejuni isolates from broiler caecum.
ERYCIPTETGENNALSTR
128
>64 6 19
64 3 1
32
>16 3
16 9
8 8 11
4 13
2 5
1 13 10
≤122
>0.5
0.5 9 3
≤0.5 12
0.25 9
0.12
≤0.12 2 1
Table 3. Distribution of MIC values among C. jejuni isolates from neck skins of broilers.
Table 3. Distribution of MIC values among C. jejuni isolates from neck skins of broilers.
ERYCIPTETGENNALSTR
128
>64 4 11
64 2 7
32 3
>16
16 5
8 13 1
4 2
21
1 12
≤119
>0.5
0.5 4 7
≤0.5 11
0.25 9
0.12
≤0.12 2 7
Table 4. Distribution of MIC values among C. jejuni isolates from gull cloacal swabs.
Table 4. Distribution of MIC values among C. jejuni isolates from gull cloacal swabs.
ERYCIPTETGENNALSTR
128
>64 8 16
64 8
32 2
>16 1
16 3 12
8 11 151
42 11185
21016 20
1 11 21
≤138
>0.5
0.5 1 37
≤0.5 26
0.25 5 11
0.12
≤0.12 27
Table 5. Distribution of MIC values among C. jejuni isolates from human faeces.
Table 5. Distribution of MIC values among C. jejuni isolates from human faeces.
ERYCIPTETGENNALSTR
128
>64 8 15
64 2 8
32 2 2
>16 1
16 10 2
8 13 3
4 3
2 6
1 11 17
≤131
>0.5
0.5 12 5
≤0.5 18
0.25 1 9
0.12
≤0.12 7 9
Table 6. MIC50 and MIC90 values.
Table 6. MIC50 and MIC90 values.
MIC50 (mg/L)MIC90 (mg/L)S (N/%)R (N/%)EUCAST Epidemiological Cut-Off Value
R
ERYBC≤1≤122/1000/0>4
BNS≤1≤120/1000/0
GS≤1250/1000/0
HF≤1≤131/1000/0
CIPBC16>162/9.120/90.9>0.5
BNS8162/10.018/90.0
GS≤0.12233/66.017/34.0
HF8168/25.823/74.2
TETBC≤0.5>6413/59.19/40.9>1
BNS≤0.5>6411/55.09/45.0
GS≤0.5>6427/54.023/46.0
HF≤0.5>6419/61.312/38.7
GENBC0.5122/1000/0>2
BNS0.250.520/1000/0
GS0.50.549/98.01/2.0
HF0.50.531/1000/0
NALBC>64>642/9.120/90.9>16
BNS>64>642/10,018/90.0
GS8>6434/68.016/32.0
HF64>646/19.425/80.6
STRBC1421/95.51/4.5>4
BNS1119/95.01/5.0
GS2446/92.04/8.0
HF21628/90.33/9.7
BC—broiler caecum; BNS—broiler neck skins; GS—gull cloacal swab; HF—human faeces.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jurinović, L.; Duvnjak, S.; Kompes, G.; Šoprek, S.; Šimpraga, B.; Krstulović, F.; Mikulić, M.; Humski, A. Occurrence of Campylobacter jejuni in Gulls Feeding on Zagreb Rubbish Tip, Croatia; Their Diversity and Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Perspective with Human and Broiler Isolates. Pathogens 2020, 9, 695. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9090695

AMA Style

Jurinović L, Duvnjak S, Kompes G, Šoprek S, Šimpraga B, Krstulović F, Mikulić M, Humski A. Occurrence of Campylobacter jejuni in Gulls Feeding on Zagreb Rubbish Tip, Croatia; Their Diversity and Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Perspective with Human and Broiler Isolates. Pathogens. 2020; 9(9):695. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9090695

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jurinović, Luka, Sanja Duvnjak, Gordan Kompes, Silvija Šoprek, Borka Šimpraga, Fani Krstulović, Marina Mikulić, and Andrea Humski. 2020. "Occurrence of Campylobacter jejuni in Gulls Feeding on Zagreb Rubbish Tip, Croatia; Their Diversity and Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Perspective with Human and Broiler Isolates" Pathogens 9, no. 9: 695. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9090695

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop