Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in the Diagnosis of Classical Swine Fever and Future Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Salmonella Hessarek Gastroenteritis with Bacteremia: A Case Report and Literature Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Growth Temperature, Trehalose, and Susceptibility to Heat in Mycobacterium avium

by
Simonne Guenette
,
Myra D. Williams
and
Joseph O. Falkinham III
*
Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2020, 9(8), 657; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9080657
Submission received: 21 July 2020 / Revised: 6 August 2020 / Accepted: 13 August 2020 / Published: 15 August 2020

Abstract

:
Mycobacterium avium is capable of an adaptive, reversible response to high-temperature survival depending on its growth temperature. Trehalose concentrations of M. avium cells grown at 42 °C were significantly higher compared to those of cells grown at 25 °C. Further, the survival of cells of M. avium grown at 42 °C and exposed to 65 °C were significantly higher than the survival of cells grown at 25 °C. This adaptive response to growth temperature may play a role in the persistence of M. avium in premise plumbing.

1. Introduction

Mycobacterium avium is an opportunistic premise plumbing pathogen whose infections in humans have been linked by DNA fingerprinting to the presence of M. avium in household plumbing [1,2]. Patients with mycobacterial pulmonary infection are, for the most part, innately susceptible to mycobacteria infection and susceptible to reinfection, even following successful antibiotic therapy [3]. Thus, it would be of value to reduce the exposure to M. avium and other nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) by reducing their numbers in household plumbing.
In a study of premise plumbing in households across the United States, it was discovered that households whose water heater temperatures were 125 °F (50 °C) or below had nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), whereas household plumbing from houses with a water heater temperature of 130 °F (55 °C) or higher seldom had mycobacteria [1]. Based on that background information, a proportion of M. avium-infected patients in Wynnewood, Pennsylvania [2] voluntarily raised their water heater temperatures. M. avium subsequently disappeared from plumbing samples in 9 of 10 houses by 16 weeks (Lande et al., in preparation). Thus, one way to reduce the numbers of M. avium and, presumably, other NTM from household plumbing and prevent reinfection would be to raise water heater temperatures to 130 °F (55 °C).
Despite the observations of M. avium behavior in patient households in Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, a concern was that raising water heater temperatures would create conditions for a selection of heat-resistant mutants of M. avium. Accordingly, the temperature-resistance of M. avium isolates from individual patients and their clonally related household plumbing isolates were measured. Those studies led to the discovery that the sensitivity of M. avium to high temperature was influenced by the growth temperature—namely, M. avium cells grown at 42 °C, its highest growth temperature, survived exposure to 60 °C for 3 h. That effect was an adaptation, not mutation, as those same household isolates grown at 25 °C were susceptible to 60 °C. As M. avium survival to 60 °C was substantially higher than that reported for M. avium [4], a study was initiated to describe the growth temperature-mediated adaptation to survival at high temperatures.
A variety of hypotheses offer testable approaches to identify the basis for the differences in heat-susceptibility. First, the M. avium strain employed in the study of Schulze-Röbbecke and Bachmann [4] could have been unique and heat-sensitive. Second, in Wynnewood, there has been a selection for heat-resistant mutants among the M. avium population in Wynnewood, Pennsylvania over the 20 years since the study of Schulze-Röbbecke and Bachmann [4]. However, those two hypotheses are incompatible with the observation that the high temperature resistance was a reversible adaptation.
One mechanism for adaptive heat resistance in bacteria is through increasing trehalose levels in cells [5,6]. Trehalose is prevalent in members of the genus Mycobacterium, and there are three pathways for trehalose synthesis in Mycobacterium smegmatis [7]. Mycobacteria are surrounded by both a cytoplasmic and outer membrane, with a true periplasmic space [7]. Trehalose is abundant in the outer membrane and, as glycolipids, are loosely associated with the cell wall and may serve as carriers of mycolic acids from the cells to the outer membrane [7]. Further, trehalose accumulation was linked to the onset of dormancy in Mycobacterium smegmatis, and the levels of trehalose correlated with viability measured as growth [8].
In this work, we tested the hypothesis that trehalose concentrations in M. avium increase as the growth temperature is raised. Further, compared to M. avium cells grown at 25 °C, cells grown at 42 °C are more resistant to exposure to heat (i.e., 65 °C).

2. Results

2.1. Reversibility of Survival Based on Growth Temperature

Cells of M. avium strain A5 grown at 42 °C survived three h of exposure to 60 °C (i.e., 75% after 5 min at 60 °C), whereas cells grown at 25 °C did not (i.e., < 1% after 5 min at 60 °C). Reversibility was shown if cells grown at 42 °C were used as an inoculum for a culture grown at 25 °C, as the resulting cells were not resistant to exposure at 60 °C and vice versa. The growth of M. avium cells was required for the transition, as shifting a culture grown at 25 °C to a late-log phase at 42 °C for 6–24 h did not increase the survival at 60 °C. Likewise, shifting a late-log phase culture grown at 42 °C to 25 °C for 6–24 h did not reduce the survival at 60 °C.

2.2. Trehalose Concentration Increased in M. avium at Higher Growth Temperatures

Following the growth of cells of M. avium at different temperatures (i.e., 25 °C, 30 °C, 35 °C, or 42 °C), the cells were collected, broken, and the trehalose and protein concentrations measured in the crude extracts. The protein concentrations were measured to normalize the trehalose values between the samples, as the protein concentrations increased as the growth temperature of M. avium increased. The results show that trehalose concentrations relative to protein in M. avium strain A5 increased as the growth temperature increased (Table 1).
Only the trehalose/protein ratios of cells grown at 42 °C were significantly higher (p < 0.05, Student’s t-test of matched pairs) than those of cells grown at 25 °C, 30 °C, or 37 °C. To confirm that this was simply not a unique property of M. avium strain A5, the same measurements were performed on crude extracts prepared from cultures of M. avium strains Va14 (T) and Va14 (O) isogenic transparent (T) and opaque (O) colony variants (Table 2).
The data confirmed that the increased proportion of trehalose in the cells of M. avium strain A5 grown at 42 °C was not a unique feature of that M. avium strain. Although the relative concentration of trehalose-to-protein in strain Va14 was lower than that found in strain A5, the same results were obtained with the opaque (O) and transparent (T) colony variants of strain Va14, demonstrating that the effect of the growth temperature was not influenced by colony type. In fact, the increases in the relative concentration of trehalose in strains Va14 (O) and Va14 (T) were higher (i.e., 11.5- and 6.3-fold, respectively) than that measured in strain A5 (7.3-fold).

2.3. Trehalose-Protein Ratios in Cellular Fractions

M. avium strain A5 cells grown at 25 °C and 42 °C were broken by bead-beating and the crude extract fractionated by ultracentrifugation into a membrane and soluble fraction. The concentrations of trehalose and protein were measured, and the trehalose-to-protein ratios calculated (Table 3). The data showed that significantly (p < 0.05, Student’s t-test of matched pairs) higher ratios of trehalose-to-protein were found in all fractions from cells grown at 42 °C compared to cells grown at 25 °C, with the highest ratio in the membrane fraction (Table 3).

2.4. M. avium A5 Cells Grown at 42 °C are Significantly More Tolerant to 65 °C Than Cells Grown at 25 °C

Following the growth of M. avium strain A5 at 25 °C and 42 °C, the cells were washed and suspended in sterile Blacksburg tap water and exposed to 65 °C for 1−5 minutes, and colony-forming units (CFU) of the surviving cells were measured. The data, expressed as the percent of CFU survival, are presented in Table 4. It can be seen that the percent survivals at 2- and 5-min exposures to 65 °C of M. avium strain A5 CFU were significantly (p < 0.001) higher for cells grown at 42 °C compared to cells grown at 25 °C (Table 4).

3. Discussion

The data included here indicate that a higher growth temperature for M. avium results in increased cellular concentrations of trehalose and an increased resistance to high temperatures (i.e., 65 °C). Although increased trehalose concentrations are associated with a high temperature resistance in other microorganisms [5,6], it remains to be determined whether high growth temperature-triggered trehalose synthesis is the determinant of the changes in behavior or is a surrogate for another change, such as the membrane composition. The isolation and characterization of M. avium mutants defective in trehalose synthesis would answer that question. It is also possible that the elevated thermal resistance is due to the induction of heat-shock proteins or to a shift in the membrane lipid composition.
The adaptation to a high temperature resistance of M. avium is not surprising in light of the fact that the genus Mycobacterium includes the waterborne pathogen Mycobacterium xenopi, which can grow at 45 °C and survives exposure to 70 °C (i.e., 50% survival after 3 min) [4]. Further, another member of the genus, Mycobacterium hassiacum, is a thermophile that grows at 65 °C [9].
An adaptation of M. avium to a high temperature resistance in response to the growth temperature is consistent with the estuarine habitat of this environmental pathogen [10,11]. In the acidic, black water swamps and in estuaries of the Southeastern Atlantic Coast of the United States, M. avium cells will be exposed to high temperatures (e.g., 45−50 °C) during the summer months. In biofilms on rocks, the temperatures in M. avium biofilms will likely be quite higher. In addition, the presence of high numbers of M. avium in the waters and biofilms of thermal springs (Falkinham, unpublished) also suggests an adaptation to growth and survival at high temperatures.
Evidence of the adaptation of M. avium is consistent with its slow growth rate; the generation time is approximately 24 h at 37 °C in a rich laboratory medium. However, M. avium’s slow growth rate is not due to a slow rate of metabolism but, rather, due to a diversion of energy (as ATP) to synthesize the long-chain fatty acids (e.g., C60–C80) that are components of the outer membrane, which makes up 30% of the weight of cells [12]. Thus, even in the face of the inhibition of essential macromolecular synthetic processes, M. avium can adapt to changing conditions by inducing activities to overcome that inhibition before irreversible processes lead to cell death.
In addition to speculating about the ecological ramifications of the adaptable, reversible resistance to high temperatures, the results dictate a change in the suggestion to patients to reduce M. avium and NTM numbers in household plumbing by raising water heater temperatures. Rather than maintaining a constant water heater temperature of 130 °F (55 °C), the results presented here suggest alternating the water heater temperature between 125 °F (50°) and 130 °F (55 °C), perhaps on a monthly basis.
Further, the results also suggest a novel method for disinfecting hospital heater-coolers that have been identified as the source of cardiac surgery-associated Mycobacterium chimaera infections [13]. M. chimaera, like its M. avium complex (MAC) relative M. avium [14], is resistant to chlorine [15] (Falkinham, in preparation). As heater-coolers heat water to 37 °C, it would be expected that M. chimaera cells would have increased high-temperature resistance. However, rather than using corrosive chlorine, perhaps a circulation of low-temperature water (e.g., 25 °C) for a sufficient time for M. chimaera to adapt by reducing the trehalose concentrations (e.g., 24 h), followed by exposure to 65 °C water for 5 min (Table 4), might reduce M. chimaera numbers sufficiently (e.g., 99.9%) to extend the time between repeat disinfection protocols.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. M. avium Strains

M. avium subspecies hominissuis strain A5 is a plasmid-free patient isolate, and M. avium strain VA14 and its transparent (T) and opaque (O) colonial variants were employed in this study. Strain VA14 was obtained from the Department of Health Services, Richmond, Virginia.

4.2. Growth Media

M. avium strains were grown in 25 mL of Middlebrook 7H9 broth (Becton Dickenson, Sparks, MD, USA) containing 0.5% (vol/vol) glycerol and 10% (vol/vol) oleic acid-albumin (M7H9), with aeration (120 rpm) at different temperatures (25 °C, 30 °C, 35 °C, or 42 °C) to a mid-log phase in 500-mL Nephalometer flasks. Growth, as turbidity (abs 540 nm), was measured and plotted to identify the growth phases. M. avium cells were enumerated as colony-forming units (CFU) on Middlebrook 7H10 agar (Becton Dickenson, Sparks, MD, USA) containing 0.5% (vol/vol) glycerol and 10% (vol/vol) oleic acid–albumin (M7H10).

4.3. Water Acclimation

Cells grown to the log phase were collected by centrifugation (5000× g) for 20 min, the supernatant medium discarded, and the cells suspended in the same volume of sterile Blacksburg tap water. The washed cells were pelleted by centrifugation, the supernatant discarded, and the cells suspended in the same volume of sterile Blacksburg tap water. The twice-washed cells were incubated for 1 week at room temperature, with aeration (60 rpm) in 500-mL flasks. Following water acclimation, CFU of 10-fold serial dilutions in sterile Blacksburg tap water were measured on M7H10 agar. For some experiments, the water-acclimated cells were concentrated 10-fold by centrifugation (5000× g for 20 min) and suspension of the pelleted cells in one-tenth the volume (25 mL) of sterile deionized water.

4.4. Isolation of Crude, Membrane, and Soluble Fractions

Cells were fractionated as described [16]. Briefly, following the growth of cultures, cells from 25 mL were collected by centrifugation (5000× g for 20 min), the supernatant medium discarded for autoclaving, and cells suspended in 25 mL of distilled water. The washed cells were again collected by centrifugation (5000× g for 20 min), suspended in 2 mL of distilled water, and broken by “bead-beating” (0.1-mm-dia. beads, Mini-Bead Beater, Omni International, Kennesaw, GA, USA). The broken cell suspension was centrifuged at 5000× g for 10 min to pellet unbroken cells and the supernatant “crude extract” collected. A portion of the “crude extract” was centrifuged at 50,000× g for 60 min and the supernatant “soluble fraction” collected. The pellet was suspended in 1 mL of distilled water to yield the “membrane fraction”.

4.5. Measurement of Protein Concentration in Cell Lysates

Total protein in the broken cell suspensions (crude extract) and soluble and pellet fractions was measured using the method of Lowry et al. [16].

4.6. Measurement of Trehalose Concentrations in Cells

Trehalose concentrations in the broken cell suspensions and fractions were measured as described [6]. Briefly, trehalose in broken cell suspensions or fractions was converted enzymatically to glucose by the action of Trehalase (porcine kidney, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and the glucose concentration measured using the glucose oxidase peroxidase-coupled assay (glucose, GO) Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) against a standard curve. The glucose concentrations of cell lysates and fractions were measured before the addition of the enzyme Trehalase to correct for endogenous levels of glucose before trehalose transformation.

4.7. Measurement of Heat Susceptibility

Cells of M. avium strain A5 were grown at 25 °C, 30 °C, 35 °C, or 42 °C, as described above, and cell suspensions were exposed to 65 °C and surviving cells measured as colony-forming units (CFU). Cells from 25 mL of the mid-log phase cultures grown at the different temperatures were collected by centrifugation (5000× g for 20 min), the supernatant medium discarded for autoclaving, and the cells suspended in 25 mL of sterile Blacksburg tap water. One milliliter of each suspension was transferred to a sterile microfuge tube and placed in a water bath set at 65 °C. Immediately, the number of colony-forming units (CFU)/mL was measured by withdrawing 0.1 mL and mixing in 9.9 mL of sterile, distilled water (100-fold dilution). A 10-fold dilution series was prepared, and 0.1 mL of each were spread on M7H10 agar in triplicate. After 1, 2, and 3 h of exposure to 65 °C, 0.1-mL samples were withdrawn and a 10-fold dilution series prepared, and 0.1 mL of each dilution was spread on M7H10 agar plates in triplicate. Plates were sealed with Parafilm™ (Amcor, Zurich, Switzerland), incubated at 37 °C for 10–14 days to allow for colony appearance, and colonies counted to calculate the CFU/mL at each time point—namely, 0, 1, 2, and 3 h of exposure. Survival values at 1, 2, and 3 h of exposure to heat were calculated based on the CFU/mL of the immediate (control) sample.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Differences in the measurements for M. avium strain A5 cells grown at 25 °C and 42 °C were assessed statistically using the Student t-test for matched populations using GraphPad InStat®, Version 3.0 Software (San Diego, CA, USA).

Author Contributions

S.G. and M.D.W. performed and analyzed the experiments, and J.O.F.III planned the experiments, analyzed the results, and drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Falkinham, J.O., III. Nontuberculous mycobacteria from household plumbing of patients with nontuberculous mycobacteria disease. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 419–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lande, L.; Alexander, D.C.; Wallace, R.J., Jr.; Kwait, R.; Iakhiaeva, E.; Williams, M.; Cameron, A.D.S.; Olshefsky, S.; Devon, R.; Vasireddy, R.; et al. Mycobacterium avium in community and household water, suburban Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 2010–2012. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wallace, R.J., Jr.; Zhang, Y.; Brown-Elliott, B.A.; Yakrus, M.A.; Wilson, R.W.; Mann, L.; Couch, L.; Girard, W.M.; Griffith, D.E. Repeat positive cultures in Mycobacterium intracellulare lung disease after macrolide therapy represent new infections in patients with nodular bronchiectasis. J. Infect. Dis. 2002, 186, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Schultz-Röbbecke, R.; Buchholtz, K. Heat susceptibility of aquatic mycobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992, 58, 1869–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Hottiger, T.; Boller, T.; Wiemken, A. Rapid changes of heat and desiccation tolerance correlated with changes of trehalose content in Saccharomyces cells subjected to temperature shift. FEBS Lttrs. 1987, 220, 113–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Reina-Bueno, M.; Argandoña, M.; Nieto, J.J.; Hidalgo-Garcia, A.; Iglesias-Guerra, F.; Delgado, M.J.; Vargas, C. Role of trehalose in heat and desiccation tolerance in the soil bacterium Rhizobium etli. BMC Microbiol. 2012, 12, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. De Smet, K.A.L.; Weston, A.; Brown, I.N.; Young, D.B.; Robertson, B.D. Three pathways for trehalose biosynthesis in mycobacteria. Microbiology 2000, 146, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Shleeva, M.O.; Trutneva, K.A.; Demina, G.R.; Zinin, A.I.; Sorokoumova, G.M.; Laptinskaya, P.K.; Shumkova, E.S.; Kaprelyants, A.S. Free trehalose accumulation in dormant Mycobacterium smegmatis cells and its breakdown in early resuscitation phase. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Schröder, K.H.; Naumann, L.; Kroppenstedt, R.M.; Reischl, U. Mycobacterium hassiacum sp. nov., a new rapidly growing thermophilic mycobacterium. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1997, 47, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Falkinham, J.O., III; Parker, B.C.; Gruft, H. Epidemiology of infection by nontuberculous mycobacteria, I. Geographic distribution in the eastern United States. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1980, 121, 931–937. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Kirschner, R.A., Jr.; Parker, B.C.; Falkinham, J.O., III. Epidemiology of infection by nontuberculous mycobacteria. X. Mycobacterium avium, M. intracellulare, and M. scrofulaceum in acid, brown-water swamps of the southeastern United States and their association with environmental variables. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1992, 145, 271–275. [Google Scholar]
  12. Brennan, P.J.; Nikaido, H. The envelope of mycobacteria. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1995, 64, 29–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sax, H.; Bloemberg, G.; Hasse, B.; Sommerstein, R.; Kohler, P.; Achermann, Y.; Rössle, M.; Falk, V.; Kuster, S.P.; Böttger, E.C.; et al. Prolonged outbreak of Mycobacterium chimaera infection after open-chest heart surgery. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 61, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Tortoli, E.; Rindi, L.; Garcia, M.J.; Chiaradonna, P.; Dei, R.; Garzelli, C.; Kroppenstedt, R.M.; Lari, N.; Mattei, R.; Mariottini, A.; et al. Proposal to elevate the genetic variant MAC-A, included in the Mycobacterium avium complex, to species rank as Mycobacterium chimaera sp. nov. Int. J. System. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 1277–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Taylor, R.H.; Falkinham, J.O., III; Norton, C.D.; LeChevallier, M.W. Chlorine-, chloramine-, chlorine dioxide- and ozone-susceptibility of Mycobacterium avium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 1702–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. George, K.L.; Falkinham, J.O., III. Identification of cytoplasmic membrane protein antigens of Mycobacterium avium, M. intracellulare, and M. scrofulaceum. Canad. J. Microb. 1989, 35, 529–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Relative trehalose concentrations in crude extracts of Mycobacterium avium strain A5 grown at different temperatures.
Table 1. Relative trehalose concentrations in crude extracts of Mycobacterium avium strain A5 grown at different temperatures.
Growth TemperatureTrehalose/Protein in Crude Extract a
25 °C1.43 ± 0.67 (6)
30 °C1.55 ± 0.37 (2)
35 °C2.19 ± 0.77 (2)
42 °C10.47 ± 0.47 (4)
a Average of duplicate measurements of (n) independent cultures.
Table 2. Relative trehalose concentrations in crude extracts of M. avium strains Va14 (T) and Va14 (O) grown at 25 °C and 42 °C.
Table 2. Relative trehalose concentrations in crude extracts of M. avium strains Va14 (T) and Va14 (O) grown at 25 °C and 42 °C.
Growth TemperatureTrehalose/Protein in Crude Extract a
Va14 (O)Va14 (T)
25 °C0.21 ± 0.080.21 ± 0.10
42 °C2.41 ± 0.421.32 ± 0.46
a Average of duplicate measurements of two independent cultures.
Table 3. Trehalose distribution in crude extract, membrane, and soluble fractions a.
Table 3. Trehalose distribution in crude extract, membrane, and soluble fractions a.
Growth TemperatureTrehalose/Protein Ratio a
Crude ExtractMembrane FractionSoluble Fraction
25 °C1.851.631.25
42 °C11.0512.0111.34
a Average of duplicate measurements of two independent experiments.
Table 4. Survival at 65 °C of M. avium cells grown at 25 °C and 42 °C.
Table 4. Survival at 65 °C of M. avium cells grown at 25 °C and 42 °C.
Growth TemperaturePercent Survival at 65 °C aTrehalose/Protein a
2 min5 minRatio
25 °C2.0 ± 0.4%0.0028 ± 0.0003%1.8 ± 0.6
42 °C9.4 ± 0.4%0.26 ± 0.01%3.1 ± 0.5
a Average of duplicate measurements of two independently grown cultures.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guenette, S.; Williams, M.D.; Falkinham, J.O., III. Growth Temperature, Trehalose, and Susceptibility to Heat in Mycobacterium avium. Pathogens 2020, 9, 657. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9080657

AMA Style

Guenette S, Williams MD, Falkinham JO III. Growth Temperature, Trehalose, and Susceptibility to Heat in Mycobacterium avium. Pathogens. 2020; 9(8):657. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9080657

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guenette, Simonne, Myra D. Williams, and Joseph O. Falkinham, III. 2020. "Growth Temperature, Trehalose, and Susceptibility to Heat in Mycobacterium avium" Pathogens 9, no. 8: 657. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9080657

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop