Next Article in Journal
Interactions between West Nile Virus and the Microbiota of Culex pipiens Vectors: A Literature Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome Analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae Reveals International High-Risk Pandemic MDR Clones Emerging in Tertiary Healthcare Settings in Uganda
Previous Article in Journal
Establishment of an Animal Model Scheme of Strongyloides stercoralis-Infected Meriones meridianus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

First Report of Plasmid-Mediated Macrolide-Clindamycin-Tetracycline Resistance in a High Virulent Isolate of Cutibacterium acnes ST115

1
Department of Biomedical Sciences, The Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2023, 12(11), 1286; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12111286
Submission received: 5 September 2023 / Revised: 23 October 2023 / Accepted: 24 October 2023 / Published: 27 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Infectious Diseases and Antimicrobial Resistance)

Abstract

:
Cutibacterium acnes, a prevalent skin commensal, has emerged as a significant global challenge due to its widespread antibiotic resistance. To investigate the antibiotic resistance mechanisms and clinical characterization of C. acnes in Korea, we collected 22 clinical isolates from diverse patient specimens obtained from the National Culture Collection for Pathogens across Korea. Among the isolates, KB112 isolate was subjected to whole genome sequencing due to high resistance against clindamycin, erythromycin, tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline. The whole genome analysis of KB112 isolate revealed a circular chromosome of 2,534,481 base pair with an average G + C content of 60.2% with sequence type (ST) 115, harboring the potential virulent CAMP factor pore-forming toxin 2 (CAMP2), the multidrug resistance ABC transporter ATP-binding protein YknY, and the multidrug efflux protein YfmO. The genomic sequence also showed the existence of a plasmid (30,947 bp) containing the erm(50) and tet(W) gene, which confer resistance to macrolide–clindamycin and tetracycline, respectively. This study reports plasmid-mediated multi-drug resistance of C. acnes for the first time in Korea.

1. Introduction

Cutibacterium acnes, a lipophilic, anaerobic, Gram-positive bacterium, is an important commensal living on human skin and an etiological agent of human acne vulgaris, sarcoidosis, joint prosthesis infections, prostate cancer, endocarditis, and osteomyelitis of the humerus [1]. As C. acnes is known to be involved in the pathological processes of multiple diseases and infections, antibiotics such as tetracyclines, oral macrolides, and topical clindamycin have been used for decades [2]. Nevertheless, antibiotic resistance reports are steadily increasing because of the extensive and inappropriate use of antibiotics. In general, C. acnes exhibits a high prevalence of resistance to tetracycline, doxycycline, clindamycin, erythromycin, and minocycline [3]. Moreover, antibiotic resistance and the hemolytic pattern of C. acnes strains are phylogroup-dependent, and there is a correlation between their molecular phylogroups and hemolytic patterns. Wright et al. reported the correlation between hemolytic phenotype and clindamycin resistance [4], and C. acnes isolates of phylotypes IA and IB were more likely to be hemolytic than phylotype II isolates [5]. However, the resistance mechanisms against erythromycin and clindamycin in C. acnes involve mutations in 23S rRNA and methylation of 23S rRNA through the ribosomal methylase gene erm(X) [6]. Macrolide and clindamycin-resistant C. acnes strains harboring 23S rRNA mutations are the prevalent group of resistant strains, emerging from antibiotic exposure in individuals with a history of antibiotic use [7]. Recently, the highest rate of erythromycin (26.7%) and clindamycin (30%) resistance in C. acnes was observed in Korea [8]. The molecular surveillance of antibiotic resistance and related mechanisms has significantly improved due to the extensive application of complete genome sequencing. Nonetheless, the number of genome-wide analyses of antibiotic-resistant C. acnes strains is limited, with only a few published reports rather than in-depth genetic studies. However, the microbiological characteristics of C. acnes with a plasmid have not been previously reported in Korea; this is necessary to understand the plasmid-mediated antibiotic-resistant mechanisms, clinical settings, and epidemiological risks. To determine the prevalence and molecular mechanisms underlying plasmid-mediated resistance in C. acnes, we present the first molecular analysis of C. acnes, an ST115 isolate harboring a plasmid with erm(50) and tet(W) genes in Korea.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Culture Conditions

C. acnes were cultured under anaerobic conditions on blood agar plates containing 5% sheep blood or in BHI (Brain Heart Infusion, Becton-Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) broth for 3–4 days using the GasPak EZ Anaerobic Pouch System (Becton-Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) or an anaerobic chamber (Bactron, Cornelius, NC, USA) connected to an anaerobic gas mixture composed of 90% N2, 5% CO2, 5% H2. Hemolytic activity was observed on blood agar plates (BAP).

2.2. Genomic DNA Preparation and Genome Sequencing

Genomic DNA was isolated from C. acnes KB112 using the TruSeq Nano DNA Kit (Macrogen, Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea) following the manufacturer’s guidelines. The integrity of the extracted genomic DNA was assessed by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel. Genome sequencing was performed by Macrogen (Macrogen, Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea) using the Illumina HiSeq platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Data were analyzed using the de novo assembly SPAdes 3.13.0. The genome sequence of C. acnes HKGB4 (GenBank RefSeq assembly accession no. GCF_021496585.1) was used as a reference for the assembly.

2.3. Sequence Analysis

The translated coding DNA sequences (CDSs) were searched against the nonredundant database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Additional analysis was performed for gene prediction and functional annotation using the RAST (Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology) server database [9]. The presence of protein-coding genes was determined using the NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. The genomic feature map of C. acnes KB112 and the plasmid pKB112 was generated using the Proksee web service (https://proksee.ca/, accessed on 3 March 2023) and annotated using PROKKA [10].

2.4. Linearization of Plasmid DNA

The plasmid was extracted from C. acnes KB112 using the GeneAll® Exgene™ Cell SV mini plasmid extraction kit (GeneAll Biotechnology Co, Seoul, Republic of Korea) with lysozyme, following the manufacturer’s guidelines. The plasmid DNA was linearized using the endonuclease AgeI (New England Biolabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA) and assessed by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel.

2.5. Phylogenetic and Genomic Arrangement Analysis

Phylogenetic analyses were conducted to determine the relationship between C. acnes KB112 and similar bacterial strains using the 16S rRNA sequence from the sequenced genome of C. acnes KB112. Pairwise sequence comparisons were performed using BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed on 3 March 2023)) to identify the nearest relatives of C. acnes KB112. A phylogenetic tree was created using the Mega11 tool [11]. The genomic arrangements of C. acnes KB112 were investigated using the progressiveMauve algorithm (v2.3.1) [12].

3. Results and Discussion

The draft genome sequence of C. acnes KB112 has been deposited in GenBank with the accession no. JAODIJ00000000. The genome of C. acnes KB112 is a circular chromosome of 2,534,481 bp with an average G + C content of 60.2% (Figure 1A). There are 2374 protein-coding genes, 52 RNA genes (rRNA 3, tRNA 45, and ncRNA 4), and 72 pseudogenes among the 2498 predicted genes. The majority of predicted CDSs (2446 genes) were classified as putative proteins, and the remaining ones were characterized as hypothetical proteins. The genome sequence of isolate KB112 revealed the presence of genes associated with inflammation, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance. The ABC transporters (YknY and YfmO) protein-coding genes are expressed in KB112, which are crucial for cell viability, virulence, pathogenicity, and resistance to antimicrobials. These transporters facilitate efflux functions, enabling the expulsion of pathogenesis-related proteins, hydrolytic enzymes, toxins, and antibiotics [13]. However, the yfmo efflux gene found in KB112 is likely associated with resistance to macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B antibiotics [14]. Additionally, this strain may express several hydrolases proteins, which are putative host-interacting factors and probably involved in its inflammatory response, as observed in acne vulgaris [15].
The most significant finding in our studies was the identification of a circular plasmid (GenBank accession no. OQ053204), denoted pKB112, with a length of 30,947 bp, and a G + C content of 65.5%. An asymmetric nucleotide composition was observed near the minimum cumulative skew point of the plasmid of KB112 (Figure 1B). This asymmetry might correspond to the origin of replication, and putative replication initiates bidirectionally from the end of the genome sequence [16]. The plasmid contained type IV secretory system conjugative DNA transfer family protein, which may be associated with conjugative transfer (Table 1) [17]. Moreover, RAST analysis revealed the presence of two antibiotic resistance genes in plasmid pKB112 (Figure 1C), of which the tetracycline-resistant gene tet(W) showed 100% sequence identity with tet(W) from C. granulosum (GenBank accession no. AP026711) and C. acnes TP-CU389 plasmid pTZC1 (GenBank accession no. LC473083). Tet(W) confers resistance to tetracycline using ribosomal protection mechanisms like Tet(M) and Tet(O) [18]. Another gene was supposed to be a member of the erm family, as it shared 100% nucleotide and amino acid similarities with the 23S rRNA adenine N-6-methyltransferase of plasmid pTZC1 from C. acnes TP-CU389. This gene of the erm family was denoted erm(50) and was located on the Tn552 transposase, which exhibits a high level of macrolide–clindamycin resistance through mutational changes or enzymatic modification of the antibiotic target. In contrast, erm(X) is located on the transposon Tn5432, facilitating its horizontal transfer between C. acnes strains [17].
Additionally, to confirm the identity and integrity of the plasmid DNA from C. acnes KB112, the circular plasmid DNA was linearized using the endonuclease AgeI, resulting four distinct DNA fragments (13,792, 8118, 5135, and 3817 bp, respectively) (Supplementary Figure S1). This enzymatic cleavage pattern confirmed the presence and approximate sizes of the expected fragments within the plasmid DNA, providing valuable insights into its structure and verifying its identity, as reported in plasmid pTZC1 [17].
Hence, to understand the microbiologic characteristics obtained through genetic analysis to gain insight into the infection mechanisms, we identified the existence of CAMP factor pore-forming toxin 2 (CAMP2) in the genome of C. acnes Kb112. CAMP2 is involved in hemolytic activity, which is commonly utilized by bacterial pathogens to break down tissues, invade host cells, disseminate, and counteract the host’s immune defenses [13]. In C. acnes, the presence of CAMP2 is considered a virulence factor as it can trigger inflammation. This factor is predominantly expressed by phylotype IA strains, which are associated with hemolysis in C. acnes and serve as a molecular marker of virulence [19]. To observe hemolytic activity, C. acnes KB112 and C. acnes ATCC 11,828 were anaerobically cultured on blood agar plates containing 5% sheep blood. C. acnes KB112 exhibited β-hemolysis (clearing of blood agar), whereas C. acnes ATCC 11,828 did not exhibit hemolytic activity (Supplementary Figure S2). The β-hemolysis pattern of C. acnes is phylogroup-dependent and correlates with both virulence and antibiotic resistance. Our previous study demonstrated that C. acnes KB112 belongs to phylotype 1A1 and sequence type (ST) 115, exhibited hemolytic activity, and was highly resistant to tetracycline, doxycycline, clindamycin, erythromycin, and minocycline [3].
The phylogenetic analysis revealed that C. acnes KB112 showed a high degree of similarity to C. acnes DSM 1897 (100%), and C. acnes TP-CU389 (99.93%) (Supplementary Figure S3). Interestingly, C. acnes TP-CU389 harbors a plasmid pTZC1 (31440 bp), which transferred this plasmid to C. acnes TP-CU426 (accession no. AP026713) and C. granulosum TP-CG7 (accession no. AP026711) with a 500 bp deletion of nucleotide. The plasmid pKB112 showed 100% (30947/30947) identity with the acquired plasmid pTZC1 of C. acnes TP-CU426 and C. granulosum TP-CG7 [20]. Therefore, the genomic arrangements of C. acnes KB112 and C. acnes TP-CU389 (accession no. AP019664) are shown in Figure 2. Each genome is displayed horizontally, and homologous portions are demonstrated as colored blocks between the genomes. The blocks that are shifted below in C. acnes KB112 represent reversed segments of the C. acnes TPCU389 genome. No homologous regions are present outside of these blocks, and the height of the similarity profile represents the average degree of sequence conservation. Although the genomic arrangement similarity between these two genomes is relatively low, the ability of C. acnes TPCU389 to transfer plasmids between strains and cutibacterium species suggests that it can also transfer plasmids with different STs of C. acnes. Hence, it is predicted that the plasmid pKB112 may have originated from the Japanese C. acnes TPCU389 strain and was subsequently transferred to Korea.
In conclusion, this study uncovers significant genomic characteristics of the C. acnes ST115 KB112 strain and its association with infections and antibiotic resistance. The identification of plasmid-mediated multi-drug resistant C. acnes for the first time in Korea will contribute to the surveillance and monitoring of C. acnes infections and highlights the importance of genomic analysis in controlling antibiotic-resistant strains to ensure effective treatment strategies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens12111286/s1. Figure S1: Agarose gel electrophoresis of C. acnes KB112 plasmid DNA and restriction enzyme digestion. Lane 1: (M) 1-kb DNA ladder; Lane 2: (UD) Undigested plasmid DNA (30,947 bp); Lane 3: Digested by AgeI restriction enzyme (expected size in bp: 13,792; 8118; 5135; 3817, respectively); Figure S2: Hemolysis of C. acnes KB112 and C. acnes ATCC 11828 on blood agar plate. Anaerobic incubation for 72 h at 37 °C. (A) C. acnes KB112 shows hemolysis (clearing of blood agar) and (B) C. acnes ATCC 11828 shows no hemolysis; Figure S3: The phylogenetic tree highlights the position of C. acnes KB112 in relation to several related bacterial strains. The tree was constructed using the Mega11 software and the neighbor joining approach. The scale bar shows the divergence times of various strains. The genome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H37Rv (AL123456) was used as an outgroup.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K.; methodology, M.S.R. and S.K.; software, M.S.R. and S.K.; validation, M.S.R. and S.K.; formal analysis, M.S.R., J.K. and S.K.; investigation, M.S.R., J.K. and S.K.; resources, M.S.R. and S.K.; data curation, M.S.R., J.K. and S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S.R.; writing—review and editing, S.K.; visualization, M.S.R., J.K. and S.K.; supervision, S.K.; project administration, S.K.; funding acquisition, S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Biomedical Research Institute grant, Kyungpook National University Hospital (2022).

Data Availability Statement

The GenBank accession numbers for the draft genome sequences of C. acnes KB112 and Plasmid KB112 (pKB112) are JAODIJ00000000 and OQ053204, respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Park, S.N.; Roh, H.; Lim, Y.K.; Kook, J.K. Complete genome sequence of Cutibacterium acnes KCOM 1861 isolated from a human jaw osteomyelitis lesion. Korean J. Microbiol. 2017, 53, 126–128. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hayashi, N.; Akamatsu, H.; Iwatsuki, K.; Shimada-Omori, R.; Kaminaka, C.; Kurokawa, I.; Kono, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Tanioka, M.; Furukawa, F.; et al. Japanese Dermatological Association Guidelines: Guidelines for the treatment of acne vulgaris 2017. J. Dermatol. 2018, 45, 898–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, S.; Song, H.; Lee, W.J.; Kim, J. Antimicrobial susceptibility and characterization of Propionibacterium acnes by multilocus sequence typing and repetitive-sequence-based PCR. J. Bacteriol. Virol. 2016, 46, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wright, T.E.; Boyle, K.K.; Duquin, T.R.; Crane, J.K. Propionibacterium acnes Susceptibility and Correlation with Hemolytic Phenotype. Infect. Dis. 2016, 9, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lee, J.; Greenwood Quaintance, K.E.; Schuetz, A.N.; Shukla, D.R.; Cofield, R.H.; Sperling, J.W.; Patel, R.; Sanchez-Sotelo, J. Correlation between hemolytic profile and phylotype of Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Propionibacterium acnes) and orthopedic implant infection. Shoulder Elbow. 2020, 12, 390–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ross, J.I.; Eady, E.A.; Carnegie, E.; Cove, J.H. Detection of transposon Tn5432-mediated macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) resistance in cutaneous propionibacteria from six European cities. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2002, 49, 165–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nakase, K.; Nakaminami, H.; Takenaka, Y.; Hayashi, N.; Kawashima, M.; Noguchi, N. A novel 23S rRNA mutation in Propionibacterium acnes confers resistance to 14-membered macrolides. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2016, 6, 160–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Moon, S.H.; Roh, H.S.; Kim, Y.H.; Kim, J.E.; Ko, J.Y.; Ro, Y.S. Antibiotic resistance of microbial strains isolated from Korean acne patients. J. Dermatol. 2012, 39, 833–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Aziz, R.K.; Bartels, D.; Best, A.A.; DeJongh, M.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Formsma, K.; Gerdes, S.; Glass, E.M.; Kubal, M.; et al. The RAST Server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom. 2008, 8, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Darling, A.E.; Mau, B.; Perna, N.T. progressiveMauve: Multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Boyle, K.K.; Marzullo, B.J.; Yergeau, D.A.; Nodzo, S.R.; Crane, J.K.; Duquin, T.R. Pathogenic genetic variations of C. acnes are associated with clinically relevant orthopedic shoulder infections. J. Orthop. Res. 2020, 38, 2731–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Beirne, C.; McCann, E.; McDowell, A.; Miliotis, G. Genetic determinants of antimicrobial resistance in three multi-drug resistant strains of Cutibacterium acnes isolated from patients with acne: A predictive in silico study. Access Microbiol. 2022, 4, acmi000404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Holland, C.; Mak, T.N.; Zimny-Arndt, U.; Schmid, M.; Meyer, T.F.; Jungblut, P.R.; Brüggemann, H. Proteomic identification of secreted proteins of Propionibacterium acnes. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Picardeau, M.; Lobry, J.R.; Hinnebusch, B.J. Analyzing DNA strand compositional asymmetry to identify candidate replication origins of Borrelia burgdorferi linear and circular plasmids. Genome Res. 2000, 10, 1594–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aoki, S.; Nakase, K.; Nakaminami, H.; Wajima, T.; Hayashi, N.; Noguchi, N. Transferable Multidrug-Resistance Plasmid Carrying a Novel Macrolide-Clindamycin Resistance Gene, erm(50), in Cutibacterium acnes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e01810-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fluit, A.C.; Visser, M.R.; Schmitz, F.J. Molecular detection of antimicrobial resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 14, 836–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Vilchez, H.H.; Escudero-Sanchez, R.; Fernandez-Sampedro, M.; Murillo, O.; Auñón, Á.; Rodríguez-Pardo, D.; Jover-Sáenz, A.; Del Toro, M.D.; Rico, A.; Falgueras, L.; et al. Prosthetic Shoulder Joint Infection by Cutibacterium acnes: Does Rifampin Improve Prognosis? A Retrospective, Multicenter, Observational Study. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Koizumi, J.; Nakase, K.; Hayashi, N.; Takeo, C.; Nakaminami, H. Multidrug Resistance Plasmid pTZC1 Could Be Pooled among Cutibacterium Strains on the Skin Surface. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0362822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Graphical representation of (A) C. acenes KB112 chromosome and (B) plasmid pKB112. Marked characteristics, including CDS on the forward and reverse strands, tRNA, rRNA, G + C content, and GC skew, are displayed from the edge to the center. The red pane in the plasmid pKB112 represents the putative origin of replication. (C) Schematic diagram of the resistance genes and neighboring genes in pKB112; red arrows represent the resistance genes of tetracycline and macrolide-clindamycin respectively, blue arrows represent the genes related to Tn552 transposase, and all gray arrows represent hypothetical genes.
Figure 1. Graphical representation of (A) C. acenes KB112 chromosome and (B) plasmid pKB112. Marked characteristics, including CDS on the forward and reverse strands, tRNA, rRNA, G + C content, and GC skew, are displayed from the edge to the center. The red pane in the plasmid pKB112 represents the putative origin of replication. (C) Schematic diagram of the resistance genes and neighboring genes in pKB112; red arrows represent the resistance genes of tetracycline and macrolide-clindamycin respectively, blue arrows represent the genes related to Tn552 transposase, and all gray arrows represent hypothetical genes.
Pathogens 12 01286 g001
Figure 2. Genome comparison of C. acnes KB112 and C. acnes TPCU1 using the Mauve tool, demonstrating various rearrangements within these genomes. The internal matches are screened and classified into local collinear blocks (LCBs). LCBs show homologous areas aligned to the segment of other genomes. Similar LCBs between the genomes are connected by colored thin lines. Blocks positioned above and below the center line of the aligned area are oriented forward and backward, respectively, relative to the first genome sequence.
Figure 2. Genome comparison of C. acnes KB112 and C. acnes TPCU1 using the Mauve tool, demonstrating various rearrangements within these genomes. The internal matches are screened and classified into local collinear blocks (LCBs). LCBs show homologous areas aligned to the segment of other genomes. Similar LCBs between the genomes are connected by colored thin lines. Blocks positioned above and below the center line of the aligned area are oriented forward and backward, respectively, relative to the first genome sequence.
Pathogens 12 01286 g002
Table 1. Homolog information, as acquired by conducting a conserved domain search.
Table 1. Homolog information, as acquired by conducting a conserved domain search.
No.LocationSize (aa)DescriptionIdentity (%)Accession No.
1112–1194360DNA methyltransferase100WP_176453839
21184–2116245hypothetical protein (plasmid)99.59BBJ25236
32541–4460639TetW: tetracycline resistance ribosomal protection protein100WP_002586627
44873–515794recombinase (plasmid)100BBJ25234
56269–5454271AAA family ATPase100WP_070434713
67687–6266476Tn552 transposase (plasmid)100BBJ25232
78328–7723202recombinase family protein99.5WP_234990909
88931–9722263erm(50): rRNA adenine N-6-dimethyltransferase100WP_176453837
910037–10369110transcriptional regulator100WP_176453836
1010366–11142258nucleotidyl transferase AbiEii/AbiGii toxin100WP_176453835
1111139–11723194recombinase family protein100WP_176453834
1212632–12979115plasmid mobilization relaxosome protein MobC100WP_176453832
1312979–14685569relaxase of type IV secretion system (plasmid)100BBJ25226
1414687–15277205DUF3801 domain-containing protein100WP_176453830
1515288–16988566type IV secretory system conjugative DNA transfer family protein100WP_176453829
1618442–18978178PrgI family protein100WP_176453825
1719046–21316756ATPase of type IV secretion system (plasmid)100BBJ25222
1821322–22842506bifunctional lytic transglycosylase/C40 family peptidase100WP_176453824
1927866–28732414anti-repressor of ImmR (plasmid)100BBJ25217
2028816–29757323ParA family protein100BBJ25216
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rana, M.S.; Kim, J.; Kim, S. First Report of Plasmid-Mediated Macrolide-Clindamycin-Tetracycline Resistance in a High Virulent Isolate of Cutibacterium acnes ST115. Pathogens 2023, 12, 1286. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12111286

AMA Style

Rana MS, Kim J, Kim S. First Report of Plasmid-Mediated Macrolide-Clindamycin-Tetracycline Resistance in a High Virulent Isolate of Cutibacterium acnes ST115. Pathogens. 2023; 12(11):1286. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12111286

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rana, Md Shohel, Jungmin Kim, and Shukho Kim. 2023. "First Report of Plasmid-Mediated Macrolide-Clindamycin-Tetracycline Resistance in a High Virulent Isolate of Cutibacterium acnes ST115" Pathogens 12, no. 11: 1286. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12111286

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop