Next Article in Journal
High Prevalence and New Genotype of Coxiella burnetii in Ticks Infesting Camels in Somalia
Next Article in Special Issue
First Record of Trichobilharzia physellae (Talbot, 1936) in Europe, a Possible Causative Agent of Cercarial Dermatitis
Previous Article in Journal
Immunization Coverage and Antibody Retention against Rabies in Domestic Dogs in Lusaka District, Zambia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Invaders as Diluents of the Cercarial Dermatitis Etiological Agent

1
Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100 Torun, Poland
2
Department of Ecology and Biogeography, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100 Torun, Poland
3
Limno Consulting, I-00124 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2021, 10(6), 740; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060740
Submission received: 15 April 2021 / Revised: 28 May 2021 / Accepted: 8 June 2021 / Published: 11 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Avian Schistosomes and Cercarial Dermatitis)

Abstract

:
Research on alien and invasive species focuses on the direct effects of invasion on native ecosystems, and the possible positive effects of their presence are most often overlooked. Our aim was to check the suitability of selected alien species (the snail Physa acuta, the bivalve Dreissena polymorpha, and the gammarid Dikerogammarus villosus) as diluents for infectious bird schistosome cercariae—the etiological factor of swimmer’s itch. It has been hypothesized that alien species with different feeding habits (scrapers, filterers and predators) that cohabit the aquatic environment with intermediate hosts of the schistosomatid trematodes are capable of feeding on their free-swimming stages—cercariae. In the laboratory conditions used, all experimental animals diluted the cercariae of bird schistosome. The most effective diluents were P. acuta and D. villosus. However, a wide discrepancy in the dilution of the cercariae between replicates was found for gammarids. The obtained results confirm the hypothesis that increased biodiversity, even when alien species are involved, creates the dilution effect of the free-living stages of parasites. Determining the best diluent for bird schistosome cercariae could greatly assist in the development of current bathing areas protection measures against swimmer’s itch.

1. Introduction

Widespread pulmonate gastropods are the first intermediate hosts of bird schistosomes (Trematoda: Schistosomatidae) and release cercariae infective for vertebrates that actively move in the water in search of the definitive host—waterfowl [1]. Moreover, cercariae can also attack accidental hosts, including humans, causing cercarial dermatitis ("swimmer’s itch") [2]. Swimmer’s itch is an emerging disease involving an intensely itchy rash but also general symptoms such as catarrh, diarrhoea, fever, insomnia [3,4,5] and in extraordinary cases disorders of the respiratory system and even anaphylactic shock [6]. Bird schistosome larvae may overcome the barrier of the mammalian skin and reach the internal organs [7]; more specifically, schistosomulae have been found in the lungs, heart, liver, kidney or intestine [7,8,9]. Some species of bird schistosomes can be extremely dangerous because they show high affinity to the central nervous system [10].
Cercarial dermatitis has been reported from nearly all continents, including Europe [11]. There are currently plentiful reports of outbreaks of swimmer’s itch from recreational water bodies [5,12,13,14,15,16]. Scientists are constantly looking for an effective method of protecting bathing areas from rashes of aquatic origin [17,18,19,20,21]. Methods that require human intervention related to the final host include (i.) reducing the population of bird hosts in recreational water areas by translocating these final hosts to other places, scaring them away using pyrotechnic harassment or even culling them and addling their eggs, as well as (ii.) the treatment of waterfowl with the anthelmintic drug praziquantel [22,23]. Bullard & Overstreet [24] consider that the elimination of the first intermediate host is the basal method of control for most digenean infections, which is carried out by introducing molluscivorous fishes [25], using molluscicides (e.g., CuSO4) [26], destroying the habitat of molluscs [17], or by manual and/or mechanical removal of molluscs from water bodies [23]. However, scientists postulate that these measures may be harmful to the environment and/or simply that their results are insufficient and short-lived [22,23,24].
In our latest work, we considered the possibility of breaking the life cycle of bird schistosomes at the stage of the first free-living larva—miracidium [20,27]. The transmission of free-living digenean larvae takes place in the presence of various communities of non-host organisms that may act on the dilution effect [28,29,30,31]. Non-host organisms can be a physical barrier in finding a host [32], or become dead-end hosts [33,34,35], as well as potentially being predators that feed on parasites during their free-living stages [36,37,38]. The last-mentioned possibility prompted us to use alien animals in our research, which are often very voracious and become food competitors of native species in the newly inhabited area [39]. Research on alien species, including invasive species, most often focuses on the negative effects of their presence in newly inhabited areas, while potential positive impacts are undervalued and overlooked [40]. It should be noted that the invaders can also influence the dynamics of native host–parasite interactions [20,41,42,43,44]. If the alien species is an incompatible host for local parasites, its co-occurrence in the various aforementioned ways leads to a dilution effect [20,35,42,45,46].
Our goal was to investigate whether common alien species with different feeding habits and frequently recorded in habitats with infectious bird schistosome larvae can dilute cercariae density by preying on them. We hypothesized that the overproduction of infectious parasite stages introduced into the environment enables the parasite to succeed in transmission to the next host, but the inclusion of new non-host species in the biocenosis may disturb this "balance". Therefore, we hypothesized that the cercariae of bird schistosome could be significantly diluted, becoming prey to newly co-inhabiting organisms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bird Schistosome Cercariae Collecting and Counting

Six individuals of Lymnaea stagnalis (Linnaeus, 1758) (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Lymnaeidae) infected with the Trichobilharzia sp. used in the experiment came from the natural environment—Lake Szymbarskie, Poland (53°36′52″ N, 19°30′39″ E). The lymnaeid snails were individually placed in beakers with 50 mL of dechlorinated tap water to obtain bird schistosome cercariae for the planned experimental setup. The shedding procedure was carried out in a breeding room with a constant temperature of 20 °C and natural light. After 22 h, the host snails were removed from the beakers and placed in an aerated aquarium where the snails were fed. After about a day, the snails were used again to release cercariae according to the described procedure. In total, each snail was used three times in as many days to obtain cercariae larvae. The long cercariae release time was used to obtain the highest density of the larvae to create optimal conditions for predators [21].
After removing the snails from the beakers, 1 mL of water with the larvae was collected from each of them three times with a micropipette. The contents of the beakers were gently hand-shaken before collection, and each of the three collections took place at a different height of the liquid—near the bottom, centre or surface. Each time the collected liquid was placed on a Sedgewick-Rafter chamber and poured with a small volume of 75% ethanol. Finally, the larvae in the chambers were accurately counted under a light microscope to estimate cercariae density.

2.2. Experimental Setup and Test Procedure

Three species of aquatic invertebrates were used as potential diluents of cercariae: the scraper Physa acuta Draparnaud, 1805 (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Physidae)—with 5 individuals (measuring 6.7 (SE 0.2) mm as shell length) per replicate beaker; the filterer Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas, 1771) (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Dreissenidae)—with 5 individuals (measuring 15 (SE 0.3) mm as shell length) per replicate, and the predator—Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894) (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Gammaridae)—with 3 individuals (measuring 6.2 (SE 0.2) mm as total body length) per replicate. These molluscs and gammarids were collected from their non-native environment—Włocławek Dam Reservoir, Poland (52°37′04″ N, 19°19′29″ E). Each experimental diluent species was tested in 6 replicates. The replicates for a given alien species were set at the same time—each diluent species was used only once for testing. The experimental animals were not fed for two days before the experiment (according to the protocol presented by Selbach et al. [38] and Born-Torrijos et al. [47]). The experiment was carried out in the beakers described above, with the cercariae released into the water by the host snails. The use of clean beakers with no submerged structures that could have affected prey consumption by the differently feeding diluents allowed us to attribute any effect on cercariae density to active consumption by the tested alien species.
About an hour (more precisely, the time during which the initial number of cercariae was counted) after taking the host snails (L. stagnalis) out of the beakers, the experimental invertebrates were added to the remaining 47 mL of water with the larvae. The potential cercariae diluents were kept in beakers with the cercariae for 24 h at a constant temperature of 20 °C and exposed to natural light. After this time, the diluents were removed from the beakers, and then under a stereoscopic microscope we checked whether any cercariae remained attached to their surface. Next, 1 mL of liquid was taken again three times from each beaker and the cercariae were counted on a Sedgewick-Rafter (General Oceanics, Miami, FL, USA) (Figure 1).
Following the results presented by Al-Jubury et al. [48], who showed that the cercariae of Trichobilharzia sp. remain active for up to 60 h at 20 °C, we assumed that the cercariae should be active throughout the experiments. However, if any cercariae died during the experiment and fell to the bottom of the beakers [49], then with the larval counting procedure described above, the fresh dead cercariae were also included in the counting.
Finally, the experimental animals were autopsied to check for the presence of digenean trematodes infection because they originated from the wild, and the presence of the infection could affect their feeding abilities [50]. To look for the presence of parasites, the experimental animals were crushed carefully and their soft parts were examined under a light microscope.

2.3. Data Analysis

The initial and final numbers of cercariae were calculated from 3 subsamples col-lected from each replication independently. To confirm the ability to consume cercariae by selected diluents we compared the initial and final cercariae densities (number of indi-viduals per mL) by means of paired sample t-tests, which can be applied regardless of data distribution type [51]. The analyses were carried out using SPSS 25.0 package (IBM Inc.).

3. Results

Beakers with P. acuta had an initial average density of 18.7 to 75.3 cercariae per mL, depending on the tested replicate (Figure 2). After the experiment, an average of 1.8 to 12.5% cercariae remained in the beakers (Figure 3), and the difference between initial and final cercarial densities was statistically significant (t = 4.226, df = 5, p = 0.008).
Beakers with D. polymorpha initially contained 17.7 to 43.7 cercariae per mL (Figure 2). Carcariae density after the end of the experiment with D. polymorpha was 34.3 to 85.7% of initial density (Figure 3). The initial vs. final density difference was statistically significant (t = 2.842, df = 5, p = 0.036).
The beakers with D. villosus had an initial density of 18.3 to 58.7 cercariae per mL (Figure 2), and an average of 2.9 to 86.6% of the initial cercariae density had remained in the beakers (Figure 3). Again, the observed difference between the initial and final cercarial densities was statistically significant (t = 4.229, df = 5, p = 0.008).
Autopsy of the experimental animals revealed no natural infection with digenean trematodes. In the gills of about 40% of the investigated individuals of D. polymorpha, the presence of a single live cercaria of bird schistosome was recorded.

4. Discussion

The obtained results indirectly support the hypothesis that the increased biodiversity of the environment may disturb the transmission of the parasite to their host [28,34,52,53,54,55]. Non-host species may feed on free-living parasite cercariae [54,56], which is an important and underestimated factor influencing the dynamics of parasite infection [21]. Digenean cercariae can be a permanent component of the diet of non-host organisms, which allows for their long-term survival and even reproduction [57]. McKee et al. [58] showed that dragonfly larvae that consumed equivalent masses of either zooplankton (Daphnia spp.) or digenean cercariae grew equally well. Moreover, the cercariae may be selectively chosen by such organisms [59].
Many research studies [21,38,52,53,55,59,60] support our finding that potential consumers of free-living cercariae are species with different feeding modes—scrapers, filterers (which may ingest the cercariae only as a byproduct of their grazing on the substrate or water filtering) and active sensu stricto predators. Additionally, our results suggest that there is a difference in the intensity of the dilution effect by scrapers, filterers and predators. Hopper et al. [37] indicate that not all co-occurring non-host species are of equal importance, even within representatives of one feeding functional group. This point of view supports Welsh et al. [61] who suggest that parasite removal rates by predators are species specific, while Selbach et al. [38] emphasize that the use of cercariae as prey is highly dependent on the interspecific interaction between their dispersion behaviour and the feeding behaviour of predators. However, other factors influencing cercarial consumption have not been taken into account, such as diluter density or initial density of cercariae [21,53].
Selbach et al. [38] found a significant reduction in the number of cercariae only in the case of the bottom-dwelling Coitocaecum parvum (Digenea: Allocreadiidae), among the investigated cercariae with different behaviour as prey for P. acuta. Therefore, the feeding of P. acuta on cercariae may seem to be quite a controversial result, which mainly shows swimming and resting behaviour as well as concentrating below the water surface [1]. Given the lack of control experiments, we could expect lower real consumption, because of the sticky nature of schistosome cercariae, for example, which would allow cercariae to be “lost” before being counted. The cercariae of Schistosoma japonicum (Trematoda: Schistosomatidae) have a truly sticky nature, and adhere to even glass and plastic surfaces [62]. According to our personal observations, the cercariae of bird schistosomes exhibit similar adhesive properties to S. japonicum. The cercariae of bird schistosome attached to the walls of the beakers (or some solid surface in an aquatic environment) can be scraped off by grazing gastropods such as P. acuta. On the other hand, snails can slide upside down on the water surface [63], apparently "grazing" on floating fine matter (e.g., pollen or parasite propagules). It should be noted here that P. acuta is very active in the presence or in search of food [64]. Another possibility seems to be that the cercariae died during the test and their bodies were simply scraped off from the bottom of the beakers by grazing P. acuta.
The sticky nature of bird schistosome cercariae may have contributed to a smaller dilution effect by D. polymorpha than by P. acuta under the experimental conditions, as D. polymorpha is considered to be an efficient filter feeder [65]. The cercarial dilution effect with D. polymorpha is not as spectacular as in the case of P. acuta, but taking into account the huge densities of dreissenid population achieved in the environment [66], it seems to us that D. polymorpha may play the role of an important dilution of the free-swimming larval stages in the natural system. Moreover, D. polymorpha also collects oocysts, cysts and spores of various species dangerous to humans [67,68,69,70,71]. In general, research about the use of different species of bivalve molluscs as pathogen collectors indicates the usefulness of these organisms for the dilution effect of parasite propagules [38,72,73,74,75,76]. However, it seems quite astonishing that the used filter feeder—D. polymorpha—which feed without reaching saturation [77], did not remove the greater number of cercariae. Géba et al. [71] showed that parasite oocysts can be bioaccumulated in the tissues of D. polymorpha, but can also be partially released via pseudofaeces. Gopko et al. [78] showed that the filter feeder Anodonta anatina (L.) (Bivalvia: Unionidae) effectively removed the furcocercariae of Diplostomum pseudospathaceum (Digenea: Diplostomatidae) from the water, but they suggest that the cercariae are probably transformed into pseudofeces and poorly ingested, similar to the studies presented by Bontes et al. [79] with the use of similar-sized filamentous cyanobacteria. We performed an autopsy of the experimental individuals of D. polymorpha which revealed the presence of live bird schistosome cercariae in the gills of several individuals. As a result, a question arises that needs further research as to whether cercariae can survive the journey through the body of filter feeders and whether individuals released via pseudofaeces are still infectious.
Dikerogammarus villosus is a highly effective predatory invasive amphipod. This gammarid can prey on crayfish eggs and hatchlings even directly from females’ abdomens [80]. Our results indicate that D. villosus may also prey on bird schistosome cercariae, although there are reports that this predator generally preys on larger prey in the environment [81], and the consumption of cercariae is strongly dependent on the size of both prey and predator [82]. Moreover, Welsh et al. [53] carried out an experiment on the dilution of cercariae using a very broad spectrum of non-host organisms and showed that amphipods may play a very important role in the dilution of the larvae. Additionally, Born-Torrijos et al. [47] showed that another species of widespread freshwater gammarids also efficiently consumes digenean furcocercariae, including genus Trichobilharzia. However, we have observed wide between-replicate variability in the dilution of the parasitic cercariae by D. villosus. During the experiment, the gammarids contaminated the water with their faeces, which made it a cloudy and slightly orange colour, which could affect their ability to see small prey (and eat all the prey in the beakers). Christensen et al. [83] and Schotthoefer et al. [56], who have used fish and copepods to dilute cercariae, also indicate that the ability of visual predators to eat the larvae is limited by cloudy water. Differences in cercariae consumption were found also for visual predators such as fish and larval damselflies observed under either light or dark conditions [82]. In addition, although all gammarids were starved for the same length of time prior to the experiment, we can not rule out the possibility that individual predators may have experienced different levels of hunger at the beginning and during the experiment. As suggested by Born-Torrijos et al., [47] the continuous movement of prey may likely facilitate a constant consumption by visual predators such as amphipods. Therefore, if the predators did not feed from the beginning of the experiment, with the duration of the experiment more and more cercariae may have become less attractive prey, because due to the length of our experiment and the short life span of the cercariae, the cercariae may have slowed down their movement and sunk later in the experiment.
Galaktionov & Dobrovolskij [84] emphasize that the production of cercariae is a key element in the success of digenean trematodes and Soldánová et al. [13] indicate that snails infected with bird schistosomes release huge amounts of infectious cercariae. We believe that reducing the number of bird schistosome cercariae in recreational waters could significantly decrease the risk of swimmer’s itch outbreaks. The dilution effect caused by feeding on free-living bird schistosome cercariae could be used to support chemical and mechanical means of protecting bathing areas against these parasites. Further research is needed to determine the best diluent, the presence of which should not be harmful to the local ecosystem. The diluent should also not become a source of other species of parasites. For example, P. acuta, on the one hand, is not considered to be a significant competitor for other snails [85], but on the other hand, in new areas, it plays the role of the second host of Echinostomatidae and Plagiorchiidae [86]. However, metacercariae abundance may [73] or may not be related to host densities [87]. These contradictory statements support the hypothesis put forward by Buck et al. [88] that every host–parasite interaction requires individual research and interpretation. From an ecological point of view, it seems interesting to investigate possible differences in feeding on the cercariae between native and alien species of scrapers, filterers and predators. The feeding behaviour of experimental animals in the presence of alternative prey will also be a significant aspect of the research, which we plan to implement soon.

Author Contributions

Study concept and design, A.S. and E.Ż.; Investigation, Ł.M., K.S. and A.S.; Data Analysis, Ł.J., P.L. and A.S.; Resources, Ł.J., A.S. and A.C; Writing—original draft, A.S.; Writing—Review and Editing, A.S., P.L., E.Ż., Ł.J. and A.C.; Supervision, A.S., P.L. and E.Ż. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by the National Science Center, Poland, grant number 2017/25/N/NZ8/01345. The APC was funded by the Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland [statutory fund research].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Raw and processed data will be shared on reasonable personal request directly from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Horák, P.; Mikeš, L.; Lichtenbergová, L.; Skála, V.; Soldánová, M.; Brant, S.V. Avian schistosomes and outbreaks of cercarial dermatitis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 28, 165–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Horák, P.; Kolářová, L. Bird schistosomes: Do they die in mammalian skin? Trends Parasitol. 2001, 17, 66–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Horák, P.; Kolářová, L.; Adema, C.M. Biology of the schistosome genus Trichobilharzia. Adv. Parasitol. 2002, 52, 155–233. [Google Scholar]
  4. Żbikowska, E. Is there a potential danger of “swimmer’s itch in Poland? Parasitol. Res. 2002, 89, 59–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Marszewska, A.; Cichy, A.; Heese, T.; Żbikowska, E. The real threat of swimmers’ itch in anthropogenic recreational water body of the Polish Lowland. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 3049–3056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bayssade-Dufour, C.; Martins, C.; Vuong, P.N. Histopathologie pulmonaire d’un modele mammifere et dermatite cercarienne humaine. Med. Mal. Infect. 2001, 12, 713–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Horák, P.; Kolářová, L. Survival of bird schistosomes in mammalian lungs. Int. J. Parasitol. 2000, 30, 65–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Olivier, L. Observations on the migration of avian schistosomes in mammals previously unexposed to cercariae. J. Parasitol. 1953, 39, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Haas, W.; Pietsch, U. Migration of Trichobilharzia ocellata schistosomula in the duck and in the abnormal murine host. Parasitol. Res. 1991, 77, 642–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Horák, P.; Dvořák, J.; Kolářová, L.; Trefil, L. Trichobilharzia regenti, a pathogen of the avian and mammalian central nervous systems. Parasitology 1999, 119, 577–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Żbikowska, E. Infection of snails with bird schistosomes and the threat of swimmer’s itch in selected Polish Lakes. Parasitol. Res. 2004, 92, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Selbach, C.; Soldánová, M.; Sures, B. Estimating the risk of swimmer’s itch in surface waters–a case study from Lake Baldeney, River Ruhr. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2016, 219, 693–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Soldánová, M.; Selbach, C.; Sures, B. The early worm catches the bird? Productivity and patterns of Trichobilharzia szidati cercarial Emission from Lymnaea stagnalis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. De Liberato, C.; Berrilli, F.; Bossù, T.; Magliano, A.; Montalbano Di Filippo, M.; Di Cave, D.; Sigismondi, M.; Cannavacciuolo, A.; Scaramozzino, P. Outbreak of swimmer’s itch in Central Italy: Description, causative agent and preventive measures. Zoonoses Public Health 2019, 66, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tracz, E.S.; Al-Jubury, A.; Buchmann, K.; Bygum, A. Outbreak of swimmer’s itch in Denmark. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2019, 99, 1116–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Gulyás, K.; Soldánová, M.; Orosová, M.; Oros, M. Confirmation of the presence of zoonotic Trichobilharzia franki following a human cercarial dermatitis outbreak in recreational water in Slovakia. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 2531–2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lévesque, B.; Giovenazzo, P.; Guerrier, P.; Laverdiere, D.; Prud’Homme, H. Investigation of an outbreak of cercarial dermatitis. Epidemiol. Infect. 2002, 129, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wulff, C.; Haeberlein, S.; Haas, W. Cream formulations protecting against cercarial dermatitis by Trichobilharzia. Parasitol. Res. 2007, 101, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Jouet, D.; Ferté, H.; Depaquit, J.; Rudolfová, J.; Latour, P.; Zanella, D.; Kaltenbach, M.L.; Léger, N. Trichobilharzia spp. in natural conditions in Annecy Lake, France. Parasitol. Res. 2008, 103, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Marszewska, A.; Cichy, A.; Bulantová, J.; Horák, P.; Żbikowska, E. Potamopyrgus antipodarum as a potential defender against swimmer’s itch in european recreational water bodies—experimental study. PeerJ 2018, 6, e5045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Born-Torrijos, A.; Paterson, R.A.; van Beest, G.S.; Vyhlídalová, T.; Henriksen, E.H.; Knudsen, R.; Kristoffersen, R.; Amundsen, P.-A.; Soldánová, M. Cercarial behaviour alters the consumer functional response of three-spined sticklebacks. J. Anim. Ecol. 2021, 90, 978–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Peirce, J.P.; Pellett, J.J.; Sandland, G.J. A Mathematical model for the control of swimmer’s itch. Nat. Resour. Model. 2020, 33, e12275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Soldánová, M.; Selbach, C.; Kalbe, M.; Kostadinova, A.; Sures, B. Swimmer’s itch: Etiology, impact, and risk factors in Europe. Trends Parasitol. 2013, 29, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bullard, S.A.; Overstreet, R.M. Digeneans as enemies of fishes. Fish Dis. 2008, 2, 817–976. [Google Scholar]
  25. Weinzettl, M.; Jurberg, P. Biological control of Biomphalaria tenagophila (Mollusca, Planorbidae), a schistosomiasis vector, using the fish Geophagus brasiliensis (Pisces, Cichlidae) in the Laboratory or in a Seminatural Environment. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 1990, 85, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Froelich, K.L.; Reimink, R.L.; Rudko, S.P.; VanKempen, A.P.; Hanington, P.C. Evaluation of Targeted Copper Sulfate (CuSO4) Application for controlling swimmer’s itch at a freshwater recreation site in Michigan. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 1673–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Marszewska, A.; Cichy, A.; Bulantová, J.; Horák, P.; Żbikowska, E. The chemotactic swimming behavior of bird schistosome miracidia in the presence of compatible and incompatible snail hosts. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Keesing, F.; Holt, R.D.; Ostfeld, R.S. Effects of species diversity on disease risk. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9, 485–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kopp, K.; Jokela, J. Resistant invaders can convey benefits to native species. Oikos 2007, 116, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Johnson, P.T.J.; Thieltges, D.W. Diversity, decoys and the dilution effect: How ecological communities affect disease risk. J. Exp. Biol. 2010, 213, 961–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Cichy, A.; Urbańska, M.; Marszewska, A.; Andrzejewski, W.; Żbikowska, E. The invasive chinese pond mussel Sinanodonta woodiana (Lea, 1834) as a host for native symbionts in European waters. J. Limnol. 2016, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Christensen, N.Ø. Schistosoma mansoni: Interference with cercarial host-finding by various aquatic organisms. J. Helminthol. 1979, 53, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sapp, K.K.; Loker, E.S. Mechanisms underlying digenean–snail specificity: Role of miracidial attachment and host plasma factors. J. Parasitol. 2000, 86, 1012–1019. [Google Scholar]
  34. Thieltges, D.W.; Jensen, K.T.; Poulin, R. The role of biotic factors in the transmission of free-living endohelminth stages. Parasitology 2008, 135, 407–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Tierney, P.A.; Caffrey, J.M.; Vogel, S.; Matthews, S.M.; Costantini, E.; Holland, C.V. Invasive freshwater fish (Leuciscus leuciscus) acts as a sink for a parasite of native brown trout Salmo trutta. Biol. Invasions 2020, 22, 2235–2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mouritsen, K.N.; Poulin, R. The mud flat anemone-cockle association: Mutualism in the intertidal zone? Oecologia 2003, 135, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Hopper, J.V.; Poulin, R.; Thieltges, D.W. Buffering role of the intertidal Anthopleura aureoradiata in cercarial transmission from snails to crabs. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2008, 367, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Selbach, C.; Rosenkranz, M.; Poulin, R. Cercarial behavior determines risk of predation. J. Parasitol. 2019, 105, 330–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Strayer, D.L.; Smith, L.C. Relationships between zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) and unionid clams during the early stages of the zebra mussel invasion of the Hudson River. Freshw. Biol. 1996, 36, 771–780. [Google Scholar]
  40. Goodenough, A.E. Are the ecological impacts of alien species misrepresented? A review of the “native good, alien bad” philosophy. Community Ecol. 2010, 11, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lettoof, D.C.; Greenlees, M.J.; Stockwell, M.; Shine, R. Do invasive cane toads affect the parasite burdens of native Australian frogs? Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2013, 2, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Pulkkinen, K.; Ruokonen, T.J.; Mykrä, M.; Tambe, G.; Karjalainen, J.; Hämäläinen, H. Indirect effects of invasive crayfish on native fish parasites. Ecosphere 2013, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gendron, A.D.; Marcogliese, D.J. Reduced survival of a native parasite in the invasive round goby: Evidence for the dilution hypothesis? Aquat. Invasions 2016, 11, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Westby, K.M.; Sweetman, B.M.; Van Horn, T.R.; Biro, E.G.; Medley, K.A. Invasive species reduces parasite prevalence and neutralizes negative environmental effects on parasitism in a native mosquito. J. Anim. Ecol. 2019, 88, 1215–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Venesky, M.D.; Liu, X.; Sauer, E.L.; Rohr, J.R. Linking manipulative experiments to field data to test the dilution effect. J. Anim. Ecol. 2014, 83, 557–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nelson, F.B.; Brown, G.P.; Shilton, C.; Shine, R. Helpful invaders: Can cane toads reduce the parasite burdens of native frogs? Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2015, 4, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Born-Torrijos, A.; Paterson, R.A.; van Beest, G.S.; Schwelm, J.; Vyhlídalová, T.; Henriksen, E.H.; Knudsen, R.; Kristoffersen, R.; Amundsen, P.-A.; Soldánová, M. Temperature does not influence functional response of amphipods consuming different trematode prey. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 4271–4276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Al-Jubury, A.; Kania, P.; Bygum, A.; Buchmann, K. Temperature and light effects on trichobilharzia szidati cercariae with implications for a risk analysis. Acta Vet. Scand. 2020, 62, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Griffiths-Jones, E.; Atkinson, H.; Hassan, A. A Comparison of the relative killing power of chlorine and chloramine on schistosome cercariae of the human type, together with a note on the relative stabilities of chlorine and chloramine. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1930, 24, 503–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Stier, T.; Drent, J.; Thieltges, D.W. Trematode infections reduce clearance rates and condition in blue mussels Mytilus edulis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2015, 529, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Underwood, A.J. Experiments in Ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997; p. 504. [Google Scholar]
  52. Orlofske, S.A.; Jadin, R.C.; Preston, D.L.; Johnson, P.T. Parasite transmission in complex communities: Predators and alternative hosts alter pathogenic infections in amphibians. Ecology 2012, 93, 1247–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Welsh, J.E.; van der Meer, J.; Brussaard, C.P.; Thieltges, D.W. Inventory of organisms interfering with transmission of a marine trematode. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 2014, 94, 697–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Welsh, J.E.; Liddell, C.; Van Der Meer, J.; Thieltges, D.W. Parasites as prey: The effect of cercarial density and alternative prey on consumption of cercariae by four non-host species. Parasitology 2017, 144, 1775–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Keesing, F.; Ostfeld, R.S. Impacts of biodiversity and biodiversity loss on zoonotic diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2023540118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Schotthoefer, A.M.; Labak, K.M.; Beasley, V.R. Ribeiroia ondatrae cercariae are consumed by aquatic invertebrate predators. J. Parasitol. 2007, 93, 1240–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mironova, E.; Gopko, M.; Pasternak, A.; Mikheev, V.; Taskinen, J. Trematode cercariae as prey for zooplankton: Effect on fitness traits of predators. Parasitology 2019, 146, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. McKee, K.M.; Koprivnikar, J.; Johnson, P.T.; Arts, M.T. Parasite infectious stages provide essential fatty acids and lipid-rich resources to freshwater consumers. Oecologia 2020, 192, 477–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mironova, E.; Gopko, M.; Pasternak, A.; Mikheev, V.; Taskinen, J. Cyclopoids feed selectively on free-living stages of parasites. Freshw. Biol. 2020, 65, 1450–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Vielma, S.; Lagrue, C.; Poulin, R.; Selbach, C. Non-host organisms impact transmission at two different life stages in a marine parasite. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Welsh, J.E.; Hempel, A.; Markovic, M.; Van Der Meer, J.; Thieltges, D.W. Consumer and host body size effects on the removal of trematode cercariae by ambient communities. Parasitology 2019, 146, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Tucker, M.S.; Karunaratne, L.B.; Lewis, F.A.; Freitas, T.C.; Liang, Y. Schistosomiasis. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 2001, 103, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Aono, K.; Fusada, A.; Fusada, Y.; Ishii, W.; Kanaya, Y.; Komuro, M.; Matsui, K.; Meguro, S.; Miyamae, A.; Miyamae, Y. Upside-down gliding of Lymnaea. Biol. Bull. 2008, 215, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lombardo, P.; Miccoli, F.P.; Giustini, M.; Cicolani, B. Diel activity cycles of freshwater gastropods under natural light: Patterns and ecological implications. Ann. Limnol-Int. J. Lim. 2010, 46, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Piechocki, A.; Wawrzyniak-Wydrowska, B. Guide to Freshwater and Marine Mollusca of Poland; Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe: Poznań, Poland, 2016; p. 280. [Google Scholar]
  66. Schloesser, D.W.; Nalepa, T.F.; Mackie, G.L. Zebra mussel infestation of unionid bivalves (Unionidae) in North America. Am. Zool. 1996, 36, 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Graczyk, T.K.; Marcogliese, D.J.; de Lafontaine, Y.; Da Silva, A.J.; Mhangami-Ruwende, B.; Pieniazek, N.J. Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha): Evidence from the st. Lawrence River. Parasitol. Res. 2001, 87, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Graczyk, T.K.; Conn, D.B.; Lucy, F.; Minchin, D.; Tamang, L.; Moura, L.N.S.; DaSilva, A.J. Human waterborne parasites in zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) from the Shannon River drainage area, Ireland. Parasitol. Res. 2004, 93, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lucy, F.E.; Graczyk, T.K.; Tamang, L.; Miraflor, A.; Minchin, D. Biomonitoring of surface and coastal water for Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and human-virulent microsporidia using molluscan shellfish. Parasitol. Res. 2008, 103, 1369–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mosteo, R.; Goñi, P.; Miguel, N.; Abadías, J.; Valero, P.; Ormad, M.P. Bioaccumulation of pathogenic bacteria and amoeba by zebra mussels and their presence in watercourses. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 1833–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Géba, E.; Rousseau, A.; Guernic, A.L.; Escotte-Binet, S.; Favennec, L.; Carbona, S.L.; Gargala, G.; Dubey, J.P.; Villena, I.; Betoulle, S.; et al. Survival and infectivity of Toxoplasma gondii and Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts bioaccumulated by Dreissena polymorpha. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 130, 504–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Goedknegt, M.A.; Welsh, J.E.; Drent, J.; Thieltges, D.W. Climate change and parasite transmission: How temperature affects parasite infectivity via predation on infective stages. Ecosphere 2015, 6, art96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Burge, C.A.; Closek, C.J.; Friedman, C.S.; Groner, M.L.; Jenkins, C.M.; Shore-Maggio, A.; Welsh, J.E. The use of filter-feeders to manage disease in a changing world. Integ. Comp. Biol. 2016, 56, 573–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Gopko, M.; Mironova, E.; Pasternak, A.; Mikheev, V.; Taskinen, J. Freshwater mussels (Anodonta anatina) reduce transmission of a common fish trematode (eye fluke, Diplostomum pseudospathaceum). Parasitology 2017, 144, 1971–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ben-Horin, T.; Burge, C.A.; Bushek, D.; Groner, M.L.; Proestou, D.A.; Huey, L.I.; Bidegain, G.; Carnegie, R.B. Intensive oyster aquaculture can reduce disease impacts on sympatric wild oysters. Aquac. Environ. Interact. 2018, 10, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rahman, R.; Tantio, F.; Yuhana, M.; Firdausi, A.P.; Sumadi, R.; Sumadikarta, A. The utilization of native freshwater mussel Pilsbryoconcha exilis as biocontrol of pathogenic bacteria Aeromonas hydrophila in Tilapia aquaculture. Omni-Akuatika 2019, 15, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jeschke, J.M.; Kopp, M.; Tollrian, R. Consumer-food systems: Why type I functional responses are exclusive to filter feeders. Biol. Rev. 2004, 79, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Gopko, M.; Mironova, E.; Pasternak, A.; Mikheev, V.; Taskinen, J. Parasite transmission in aquatic ecosystems under temperature change: Effects of host activity and elimination of parasite larvae by filter-feeders. Oikos 2020, 129, 1531–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bontes, B.M.; Verschoor, A.M.; Pires, L.M.D.; Van Donk, E.; Ibelings, B.W. Functional response of Anodonta anatina feeding on a green alga and four strains of cyanobacteria, differing in shape, size and toxicity. Hydrobiologia 2007, 584, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Roje, S.; Švagrová, K.; Veselỳ, L.; Sentis, A.; Kouba, A.; Buřič, M. Pilferer, murderer of innocents or prey? The potential impact of killer shrimp (Dikerogammarus villosus) on crayfish. Aquat. Sci. 2021, 83, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Dodd, J.A.; Dick, J.T.A.; Alexander, M.E.; MacNeil, C.; Dunn, A.M.; Aldridge, D.C. Predicting the ecological impacts of a new freshwater invader: Functional responses and prey selectivity of the ‘killer shrimp’, Dikerogammarus villosus, compared to the native Gammarus pulex. Freshw. Biol. 2014, 59, 337–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Orlofske, S.A.; Jadin, R.C.; Johnson, P.T. It’sa predator–eat–parasite world: How characteristics of predator, parasite and environment affect consumption. Oecologia 2015, 178, 537–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Christensen, N.Ø.; Frandsen, F.; Nansen, P. The interaction of some environmental factors influencing Schistosoma mansoni cercarial host-finding. J. Helminthol. 1980, 54, 203–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Galaktionov, K.V.; Dobrovolskij, A.A. The Biology and Evolution of Trematodes: An Essay on the Biology, Morphology, Life Cycles, Transmissions, and Evolution of Digenetic Trematodes; Kluwer Academic Publisher: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; p. 592. [Google Scholar]
  85. Semenchenko, V.; Laenko, T.; Razlutskij, V. A New record of the north american gastropod Physella acuta (Draparnaud 1805) from the Neman River Basin, Belarus. Aquat. Invasions 2008, 3, 359–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Faltỳnková, A. Larval trematodes (Digenea) in molluscs from small water bodies near Šeské Budšjovice, Czech Republic. Acta Parasitol. 2005, 50, 49–55. [Google Scholar]
  87. Buck, J.C.; Lutterschmidt, W.I. Parasite abundance decreases with host density: Evidence of the encounter-dilution effect for a parasite with a complex life cycle. Hydrobiologia 2017, 784, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Buck, J.C.; Hechinger, R.F.; Wood, A.C.; Stewart, T.E.; Kuris, A.M.; Lafferty, K.D. Host density increases parasite recruitment but decreases host risk in a snail–trematode system. Ecology 2017, 98, 2029–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental procedure.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental procedure.
Pathogens 10 00740 g001
Figure 2. Bird schistosome cercariae in beakers (ind/mL, mean values ± SE, n = 3 for each tested replicate) before and after exposure to following experimental invertebrate species: (A) Physa acuta (5 specimens), (B) Dreissena polymorpha (5 specimens), (C) Dikerogammarus villosus (3 specimens).
Figure 2. Bird schistosome cercariae in beakers (ind/mL, mean values ± SE, n = 3 for each tested replicate) before and after exposure to following experimental invertebrate species: (A) Physa acuta (5 specimens), (B) Dreissena polymorpha (5 specimens), (C) Dikerogammarus villosus (3 specimens).
Pathogens 10 00740 g002
Figure 3. Average densities of bird schistosome cercariae remaining (%) after exposure to following experimental invertebrate species: (A) Physa acuta (5 specimens), (B) Dreissena polymorpha (5 specimens), (C) Dikerogammarus villosus (3 specimens).
Figure 3. Average densities of bird schistosome cercariae remaining (%) after exposure to following experimental invertebrate species: (A) Physa acuta (5 specimens), (B) Dreissena polymorpha (5 specimens), (C) Dikerogammarus villosus (3 specimens).
Pathogens 10 00740 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stanicka, A.; Migdalski, Ł.; Szopieray, K.; Cichy, A.; Jermacz, Ł.; Lombardo, P.; Żbikowska, E. Invaders as Diluents of the Cercarial Dermatitis Etiological Agent. Pathogens 2021, 10, 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060740

AMA Style

Stanicka A, Migdalski Ł, Szopieray K, Cichy A, Jermacz Ł, Lombardo P, Żbikowska E. Invaders as Diluents of the Cercarial Dermatitis Etiological Agent. Pathogens. 2021; 10(6):740. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060740

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stanicka, Anna, Łukasz Migdalski, Katarzyna Szopieray, Anna Cichy, Łukasz Jermacz, Paola Lombardo, and Elżbieta Żbikowska. 2021. "Invaders as Diluents of the Cercarial Dermatitis Etiological Agent" Pathogens 10, no. 6: 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060740

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop