Next Article in Journal
Fertility Decision-Making in the UK: Insights from a Qualitative Study among British Men and Women
Previous Article in Journal
Introduction to Special Issue “Gender, Politics, and Everyday Life: Power, Resistance, and Representation”
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Expert and Diffuse Design of a Sustainable Circular Economy in Two German Circular Roadmap Projects

Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(9), 408; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11090408
by Gavin Melles 1,2,*, Christian Wölfel 2, Jens Krzywinski 2 and Lenard Opeskin 2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(9), 408; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11090408
Submission received: 22 July 2022 / Revised: 25 August 2022 / Accepted: 1 September 2022 / Published: 6 September 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

An interesting and useful paper, worthy of publication.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Reviewer 1 asks for no changes

Reviewer 2 Report

Some suggestions to improve the paper:

1. Research question\questions are missing in the Intro section. Please clarify the RQs which should sound clear and specific. Also it is always important to highlight the novelty\originality of the paper.  

2. This research should be restructured. Please follow IMRaD format.

3. There is no separate section describing Research Methods. Please revise accordingly.

4. It is necessary to enhance this study with visual materials and also tables, if applicable.

5. What is the practical implication of this study? Please clarify in the Discussion section which could be added.

6. The findings of the study should be highlighted in the Conclusion section.

Author Response

Reviewer 2 notes and answers

  1. Research question\questions are missing in the Intro section.Please clarify the RQs which should sound clear and specific. Also it is always important to highlight the novelty\originality of the paper. Research Questions added
  2. This research should be restructured. Please follow IMRaD format. Abstract reformulated to IMRAd format
  3. There is no separate section describing Research Methods. Please revise accordingly. Research Methods section included
  4. It is necessary to enhance this study with visual materials and also tables, if applicable. There is limited or no scope to do so given word length
  5. What is the practical implication of this study? Please clarify in the Discussion section which could be added. Practical implication added
  6. The findings of the study should be highlighted in the Conclusion section. Findings highlighted
Back to TopTop