Next Article in Journal
Inclusive Research and Intellectual Disabilities: Moving Forward on a Road Less Well-Travelled
Previous Article in Journal
University Teachers’ Digital Competence: A Case Study from Portugal
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Social Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/socsci11100482
socsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Subjective Well-Being and Future Orientation of NEETs: Evidence from the Italian Sample of the European Social Survey

by
Cristiano Felaco
1 and
Anna Parola
2,*
1
Department of Social Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Vico Monte della Pietà 1, 80138 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Via Porta di Massa 1, 80133 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(10), 482; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100482
Submission received: 14 September 2022 / Revised: 3 October 2022 / Accepted: 11 October 2022 / Published: 17 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Work, Employment and the Labor Market)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The acronym ‘NEET’ includes adolescents and young people aged 15–34 years not engaged in education, employment or training programs. According to recent studies, NEET represents a high-risk category to suffer from lower well-being and mental health problems. Following a life course approach, this study examined the self-reported subjective well-being and the future orientation of NEETs. To do this, the study used the latest European Social Survey data (Round 9—2018), limiting our analysis to Italian respondents aged 15–34 years. The final sample included 695 participants. Descriptive analysis and Student’s t-test were performed to compare the subjective well-being and the future orientation of NEETs with those of non-NEET young adults. We hypothesize lower subjective well-beings in the NEET group and more difficulties in future planning than in the non-NEET group. Then, a mediation path model was carried out to study the relationship between employment condition (non-NEET/NEET) and subjective well-being through future orientation. The path model showed the mediator role of future orientation. Results indicated that future orientation plays a role in mitigating the effect of the unemployment condition on well-being. Starting from these findings, practical implications regarding career guidance interventions are discussed.

1. Introduction

The term ‘NEET’ includes adolescents and young people not engaged in education, employment, or training programs. The acronym, which first emerged in the UK in the late 1980s, has become a broader and more exact measure of exclusion compared with the youth unemployment indicator (Eurofound 2016).
Although the age range defining NEET often varies among EU countries, Eurostat focuses on the population aged 15–34 years. In 2021, the lowest NEET rates are found in the Scandinavian countries and Northern Europe in general. Among member states of the European Union, Italy had the largest NEET population, where more than 20 percent of all young people are neither in employment nor in education or training (Eurostat 2022). The number of NEETs increases with age since most adolescents aged 15–19 years in the EU remain in education and training (6.8%). For the population aged 20–24 years, the NEET rate was 14.8%, while for those aged 25–29 years, the rate was 17.3%. The gender gap is still present in relation to presence in the labor market. A total of 14.5% of females aged 15–29 years were NEET, while the corresponding rate among males was 11.8%.
Addressing youth unemployment inevitably requires an examination of the financial and economic conditions of countries. The share of NEET youth followed the economic downturn of the late 2000s, and the current crisis related to the COVID-19 pandemic raises similar concerns. According to the International Labor Organization (2020), young people represent the most at-risk group to experience labor market exclusion due to the economic and financial consequences of COVID-19.
In this study, we examine the self-reported subjective well-beings and future orientations of NEET and non-NEET youth in Italy using the European Social Survey (ESS) data. We frame our study from a life-course paradigm (Shanahan et al. 2016; Schoon and Bynner 2017, 2019). According to this approach, the school-to-work transition is an important developmental task for young people. Young people who remain out of the labor market and are not engaged in education or training programs represent a high-risk category to suffer from a lower well-being (Jongbloed and Giret 2022).
Quantitative and qualitative studies (Felaco and Parola 2020; Gaspani 2018; Parola et al. 2022) have shown how NEET individuals can experience difficulties in planning for the future. Moreover, a negative future time perspective can have effects on psychological health with both internalizing and externalizing problems (Parola et al. 2022).
The aim here is to investigate the relationship between employment condition in young adults (NEET and non-NEET) and subjective well-being, while analyzing the potential mediator role of future orientation. We hypothesized that NEETs are more likely to suffer from a lower subjective well-being and future orientation, and that future orientation might play a role in mediating this relationship.

2. Literature Review

2.1. NEET Phenomenon in a Life-Course Approach

Although the NEET rate for young people is closely linked to economic performance and the business cycle, NEETs are often examined without considering the socioeconomic context, and most studies fail to understand the highest rate in the EU South (Mascherini 2019; Kotroyannos et al. 2015; Zuccotti and O’Reilly 2019).
In a recent paper, Avagianou et al. (2022) proposed a theoretically informed empirical examination of the spatiotemporally uneven expansion of the NEET population between 2008 and 2018 in the EU South. As the authors said, “the weak integration of youth—particularly female—into many of the regional labour markets examined is related to spatially dependent structural barriers and institutional insufficiencies. It is also related to various cultural norms that affect the agency of young people” (Avagianou et al. 2022, p. 17). Three factors are proposed by the authors as possible explanations: (a) local economies’ structural constraints; (b) formal institutions, more specifically, the skill-mix market demands and the quality of the educational system; and (c) family and social relations.
Guided by a life-course approach (Shanahan et al. 2016; Schoon and Bynner 2017), characteristics of institutional structures and transition systems have a key role in shaping the school-to-work transition and buffering the effects of economic recession. According to the life-course theory, school-to-work transitions can be defined as a developmental task for young people because it is a status transition in the institutionalized life course (Shanahan 2000). Young people are called to manage a sequence of status–role transitions and role configurations based on social structures. In Western societies, the transition from school to work has been delayed due to the fewer employment opportunities that changed following the economic recession. Therefore, NEET status seems to be moving along a trajectory of disadvantage (Bynner and Parsons 2002) that the economic recession reinforced (Schoon and Bynner 2019). This may be particularly true in countries with stagnating economies, such as Italy. Within the transition regime model, Italy was included in the sub-protective transition regime, which is characterized by mostly comprehensive education, less developed vocational training, and insecure employment and limited social protection of the labor market (Walther 2006; Schoon and Bynner 2019).

2.2. NEETs and Well-Being

Although at the social level, the NEET status represents a considerable loss in terms of unused productive capacity and a substantial welfare payment cost (Eurostat 2022), the young people pay the biggest costs. NEET represents a high-risk category to suffer from a lower well-being.
Subjective well-being is defined as people’s appraisals and evaluations of their own lives (Diener et al. 2010) and includes reflective cognitive judgments, such as life satisfaction and emotional responses to ongoing life in terms of positive and negative emotions.
The literature on subjective well-being has grown enormously in the past decade (Diener et al. 2018). Several studies have underlined the internal and external determinants of subjective well-being (Schimmack 2006). Positive subjective well-being is associated with significant improvements in several outcomes such as health and longevity, supportive social relationships, citizenship, work performance, and resilience (for a review, see De Neve et al. 2013), as well as lifestyle in general (Nie et al. 2021; Zheng and Ma 2021). Conversely, poor health, separation, unemployment, and a lack of social contact are all strongly negatively associated with subjective well-being (Dolan et al. 2008).
According to the most recent review of subjective well-being (Diener et al. 2018), one of the more highly replicated findings in this area is that unemployment is strongly associated with lower subjective well-being.
A recent study by Jongbloed and Giret (2022) examined the effects of NEET status on subjective well-being across 24 EU countries. The authors found that NEET status has a strong, significant negative effect on well-being as compared to the non-NEET population. Moreover, several studies showed that the unemployment condition in youth is associated with distress (Bjarnason and Sigurdardottir 2003; Stea et al. 2019), depression (Crowe and Butterworth 2016; Bartelink et al. 2019), and anxiety (Virtanen et al. 2016; Bartelink et al. 2019).
A recent systematic review (Gariépy et al. 2022) shed light on the directionality of these associations and highlighted that several longitudinal studies found that mental health problems at an early age increase the vulnerability to becoming NEET (Goldman-Mellor et al. 2016; López-López et al. 2019; O’Dea et al. 2016; Power et al. 2015; Rodwell et al. 2018), while only a few studies showed evidence for the inverse relationship (Gutierrez-Garcia et al. 2017). Moreover, NEET condition predicted later suicidal behavior (Gutierrez-Garcia et al. 2017) and alcohol use disorder (Gutierrez-Garcia et al. 2017; Manhica et al. 2019).

2.3. NEETs and Future Orientation

Future orientation is an individual’s subjective view of the future (Seginer 2009). As a general concern for and corresponding consideration of one’s future, it may shift depending on situational factors (Kooij et al. 2018). As such, future orientation is conceptualized as self-contextualizing (Zimbardo and Boyd 1999).
Several works studied how young people face the future (Brannen and Nilsen 2002; Devadason 2008). As Gaspani (2018) noted, studies confirmed the growing inability to plan long-term and the need to neutralize future uncertainty.
This “fear of the future” seems to be more felt in NEET individuals. Studies showed that the NEET condition leads young people to perceive the future as more difficult and complicated (Parola and Marcionetti 2022). According to Piumatti et al. (2014), the lack of career opportunities may increase the precariousness of young people’s future career plans.
Moreover, the perception of uncertainty about the future may have negative psychological effects in terms of individuals’ health (De Witte 2005; Sutin and Costa 2010). Indeed, future orientation is crucial for positive development outcomes (Nurmi 2005) and is crucial for well-being, motivation, and behavior (Kooij et al. 2018; Sun and Shek 2012).
Parola and Donsì (2019) compared the time perspective following Zimbardo and Boyd’s (1999) paradigm of the fatalistic and hedonistic present and future orientations in students, employees, and NEET youths. The study showed that the NEET youths are present-fatalistic, focusing on the control of the events. Hence, NEET youths presented a lower level of future orientation than the students and employees.

2.4. Links between NEET Condition, Future Orientation, and Well-Being

Several studies showed the link between socioeconomic status (SES) and future orientation and highlighted that a higher SES is most likely associated with a future-oriented time perspective (Fuchs 1982; Singh-Manoux and Marmot 2005). Guthrie et al. (2009) showed that a future-oriented time perspective seems to be typical of individuals with a high level of education and was more present in the sample of employees.
The perception of uncertainty about the future, in turn, may have negative psychological effects in terms of individuals’ health (De Witte 2005; Sutin and Costa 2010). Positive future orientation is crucial for positive development outcomes (Nurmi 2005) and is crucial for well-being, motivation, and behavior (Kooij et al. 2018; Sun and Shek 2012). Prenda and Lachman (2001) showed that the anticipation of attaining value goals in the future operated as a protective factor on mental health. Moreover, as noted by Shipp et al. (2009), individuals with a lower level of future orientation have a more pessimistic view of their future that, in turn, leads to the worry of an unpredictable future and increased feelings of anxiety. In a recent meta-analysis, Kooij et al. (2018) reported that positive future orientation was associated with life satisfaction and subjective health but not with happiness. Moreover, individuals with a higher level of future orientation reported the highest levels of well-being (higher levels of life satisfaction and subjective health, and lower levels of anxiety and depression).
Previous studies have shown the mediator role of future orientation between SES and health (Guthrie et al. 2009), and the moderation role of future time perspective between employment condition and mental health such as anxiety, depression, withdrawal, and aggressive behavior (Parola and Marcionetti 2022). To our knowledge, no research has studied the mediation role of future orientation between employment condition (NEET vs. non-NEET) and the dimension of subjective well-being.

3. The Current Study

In this study, we examine the subjective well-being and future orientation of NEET and non-NEET youth in Italy using the European Social Survey (ESS) data. Moreover, we tested the mediator role of future orientation between employment condition and subjective well-being.
Most studies that have addressed the difficulties of school-to-work transitions, such as the transition to adulthood, have adopted the life-course paradigm (Buchmann and Kriesi 2011). This approach is based on the assumption that historical change influences individual development, and individual development in the aggregate can influence historical change (Johnson et al. 2011). Transition systems reflect the features of national institutional and structural arrangements, including the education system, the labor market, the welfare system, and family structures (Raffe 2008, 2014). The ESS adopts a full comparative perspective and provides a unique resource on the changing social, political, and economic conditions in Europe (Schnaudt et al. 2014). The protocol administered by different European countries allows for looking at the findings in the contexts of single-country as well as cross-national analyses.
Based on the above frameworks, we hypothesized that NEET youth are more likely to experience lower levels of subjective well-being (H1), and future orientation (H2). Moreover, we hypothesized a negative relationship between future orientation and subjective well-being (H3). Finally, we hypothesized that future orientation might play a role in mediating the relationship between employment condition and subjective well-being (H4). The conceptual model is shown in Figure 1.
To verify our hypothesis, we applied the mediation path analysis to data from the European Social Survey (ESS).

4. Materials and Methods

ESS is a large-scale and cross-national research program on basic human values, attitudes, beliefs, and behavioral patterns of different populations in more than thirty countries. We made use of the Round 9 data, which refers to the year 2018. At this moment, Round 9 refers to the latest data collected in Italy.
The population targeted by the ESS is all non-institutionalized individuals aged 15 years and over regardless of their legal status, nationality, and language, and a sampling strategy using a strict random probability design ensures the representativeness of the sample.
We limited our analysis to Italian young NEETs; to do so, we filtered the matrix such that we only had respondents aged 15–34 years who lived in Italy during the survey period. In our sample, NEETs are young people aged 15–34 years unemployed and not seeking a job.
To accomplish our research aims, we investigated the relationship between NEET status (non-NEET/NEET) and self-reported subjective well-being, also analyzing the potential mediator role of future orientation. Self-reported subjective well-being derived from index scores made by the combination of two variables selected from the ESS sample: self-reported life satisfaction (item used: “How satisfied are you with your life as a whole on a scale of zero to 10?”) and levels of happiness (item used: “How happy are you on a scale of zero to 10?”). The two items used are in line with the theoretical concept of “subjective well-being” (Diener et al. 2010). Moreover, these two items have a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.75.
The variable used as mediator was “Plan for future or take each day as it comes” which can be answered by participants between 0 (I plan for my future as much as possible) and 10 (I just take each day as it comes).

Data Modeling

At first, we used the information obtained through the application of ESS Round 9 from 2018 to characterize the sample: gender, age, education, marital status, co-residence of parents and children, and typology of the place of residence. ANOVAs, LSD post-hoc tests, and linear regressions were performed to analyze the influence of sociodemographic variables on subjective well-being and future orientation.
To evaluate self-reported subjective well-being and future orientation, we performed mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis descriptive statistical analyses, and a difference analysis (Student’s t-test). Student’s t-tests and bootstrap analysis (95% CI) estimated with 5000 bootstrap samples were performed to detect differences between the non-NEET group and the NEET group in well-being and future orientation. The effects of the differences were evaluated with Hedge’s g.
The normal distribution of the sample was ensured by the values of skewness (|Sk.| < 3) and kurtosis (|K.| < 10).
Statistical analyses were performed with R software (R Core Team 2017) and the following packages: lavaan (Rosseel et al. 2015), corrplot (Wei et al. 2017), and graphViz via DiagrammeR (Iannone 2018). To test the hypothesis that future orientation mediates the relationship between employment status and subjective well-being, a mediation analysis was computed (Hayes 2017 with a 5000-bootstrap resampling procedure. The mediation analysis tested whether the indirect effect of the future orientation mediated the effect of employment status and subjective well-being with the bootstrapping confidence interval.
Considering the score distribution of the measured variables, the maximum likelihood (ML) estimator was used to conduct the following statistical analyses. In line with previous studies (Rossi et al. 2021), a 2-step approach was followed (Hayes 2017; MacKinnon 2012).
STEP 1: A predictor-only model was specified: the ‘employment condition’ (X) was regressed on ‘subjective well-being’ (Y).
STEP 2: the full mediation model was specified: the ‘employment condition’ (X) was regressed on ‘subjective well-being’ (Y) through ‘future orientation’ (see Figure 1).
All the reported regression coefficients were unstandardized (β).

5. Results

The characteristics of the sample are presented in Table 1. The sample comprised 695 participants who were almost equally distributed by gender, mostly unmarried because we only considered individuals up to 34 years old (mean age about 25 years), and with a mean of 12.4 years of education. Moreover, just over a fifth of the sample was composed of young NEETs, and the main source of income was salary or wages for little more than 40 percent of participants, whereas more than half of them had no personal income. Most of the sample lived in the countryside.
ANOVAs revealed a significant effect on the following variables: well-being per employment conditions F(1, 685) = 25.503, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.036); respondent’s income source F(2, 601) = 4.107, p < 0.05, η2 = 0.036); future orientation per employment conditions F(1, 686) = 15.915, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.023); and the respondent’s income source F(2, 602) = 8.846, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.013). Linear regression showed that future planning was predicted by years of education (β = −0.248, t = −6.623, p < 0.001) and age (β = 0.155, t = −4.068, p < 0.001); in addition, well-being was predicted by years of education (β = 0.102, t = 2.666, p < 0.01) and age (β = −0.172, t = −4.585, p < 0.001).
Student’s t-tests are reported in Table 2. Statistically significant differences between the non-NEET group and the NEET group were found. The non-NEET group reported a higher mean than the NEET group for the well-being dimension (t = 5.050, p < 0.001). Moreover, the non-NEET group had a lower mean than the NEET group for the future orientation variable. In other words, these findings indicate that non-NEETs show a higher positive subjective well-being and tend to plan more for the future.
A mediation path analysis was conducted to grasp the effect of employment condition on subjective well-being and the role of future orientation in the relationship.
The mediation path analyzed whether employment condition influenced subjective well-being and whether future orientation mediated the effect of employment condition on subjective well-being (Figure 1).
This research employed the bootstrapping mediation test for the analysis, which provided the indirect effect.
The direct effect (Figure 2 and Table 3) indicates that young people in NEET condition are likely to have a lower subjective well-being (β = −0.665, SE = 0.143, p < 0.001).
Moreover, individuals who experience the NEET condition are likely have a lower future orientation (β = 1.003, SE = 0.252, p < 0.001).
Finally, individuals that have a low future orientation are likely to have a lower subjective well-being (β = −0.053, SE = 0.021, p < 0.05).
Bootstrapping analysis indicates that the indirect effect was significant (β = −0.053, SE = 0.029, p < 0.01, CI [−0.116, −0.005]).

6. Discussion

The NEET acronym refers to young people not engaged in education, employment, or training. Although the phenomenon of unemployment has always been a social problem, in recent years, the interest in the psychological effects of youth unemployment has been increasing.
This may be particularly true because the current world in which young people are called to find a job has different characteristics compared to the past. Among the major threats and challenges young people are facing, there are socioeconomic policies and inequalities and digitalization. In terms of socioeconomic policies and inequalities, the labor market is characterized by job insecurity, temporary assignments, and fragmented career paths that make the transition to the world of work more difficult. In terms of digitalization, the technological evolution has, in some cases, contributed to the worsening of working conditions and increased wage disparities (Ford 2015), along with racial (Kang et al. 2016) and gender (Dastin 2018) discrimination.
Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic also has a not negligible impact because it has exposed and exacerbated existing inequities in the labor market (International Labor Organization 2020).
In this scenario, youth represent the most vulnerable category. As reported by Blustein et al. (2020), the growing precarity of work is having particularly painful impacts on young people across the globe.
Guided by a life-course approach (Shanahan et al. 2016; School and Bynner 2019), the school-to-work transition consists of a crucial developmental task. The non-adaptive school-to-work transition (Parola et al. 2022) has devastating effects on the psychological health and well-being of individuals (Bartelink et al. 2019).
In this study, we focused on the effects of the NEET condition on subjective well-being and future orientation and the mediation role of future orientation between employment condition and subjective well-being. To this end, we have used the European Social Survey data (Round 9) related to the Italian context.
First, in a preliminary descriptive analysis, we briefly compared the subjective well-being and future orientation among NEET and non-NEET groups. Results showed lower levels of perceived well-being in the NEET subsample than in non-NEET group. Moreover, the subsample of NEET youths presented a tendency to live more on the day-to-day than the non-NEET group.
Then, a mediation path model was performed to analyze whether the employment condition influenced subjective well-being while the future orientation mediated the effect of employment condition on subjective well-being.
According to our H1, we confirmed the relationship between employment condition and subjective well-being. Young people of NEET status are likely to have a lower subjective well-being. This evidence was in line with previous studies that highlighted the effect of unemployment condition on subjective well-being (Jongbloed and Giret 2022). A recent Italian longitudinal study (Bonanomi and Rosina 2022) showed that passing from a non-NEET to NEET status leads to a lower level of well-being, while the exit from NEET status leads to significant increases in well-being.
In line with H2, we confirmed the relationship between employment condition and future orientation. Individuals who experience the NEET condition have a lower tendency to plan for the future. The weak future orientation is related to the idea of a bleak (Bynner and Parsons 2002) or dark future (Zaleski et al. 2019). According to Bynner and Parsons (2002), for individuals who are not engaged in education, employment, or training, the future may be bleak. They tend not to worry about the future because their mind is occupied with what is happening in the present moment (Sobol-Kwapinska et al. 2016).
Moreover, we also confirmed the relationship between subjective well-being and future orientation (H3). According to several studies (Kooij et al. 2018; Mohammed and Marhefka 2020), among the time perspective dimensions, difficulty in future planning has profound effects on different negative outcomes, such as well-being.
Finally, the mediation test supported the proposed H4 by showing the mediator role of the future orientation. In other words, future orientation may foster the relationship between employment condition and subjective well-being. Future orientation theories emphasize the motivational importance of future goals by linking individuals’ present behaviors to their future goals (Hawkins and Blakeslee 2004).
These findings may contribute to stressing the negative outcomes of youth unemployment in the Italian context. As we said above, Italy reported the highest number of individuals in the NEET condition (Eurostat 2022). Such a condition in Italy is also fueled by the problematic school-to-work transition. In recent years, psychological and sociological studies have studied the Italian school-to-work transition compared with other European countries (Brunetti and Corsini 2019; Pastore et al. 2022). In particular, Pastore (2019) highlighted that the slowness of school-to-work transition is a consequence of the “sclerotic” labor market with a very low job-finding rate and an education system that is not fully efficient. The consequence of the Italian education system is that most young Italians find a permanent job in their thirties.
While we will not go into detail on the analysis of EU policies, our study suggested the importance of supporting the individual in school-to-work transitions because the unemployment condition affects their well-being.

Limitations and Future Research Directions

This study was not free of limitations. Firstly, the ESS datasets have a correlational nature, which does not allow conclusions about causal relationships between variables. A longitudinal panel design would be desirable to understand the direction of effects. Secondly, we relied solely on self-report measures. We must consider that the data may be influenced by a reporting bias (e.g., social desirability). Finally, the limitation of using secondary data must be acknowledged. Pre-existing data are often limited in terms of the psychological variables considered. In this study, future orientation was assessed by a single item. Nevertheless, consistent with the recommendation of Weston et al. (2019) on the use of secondary data in psychology, using pre-existing data appears to be a powerful and low-cost tool for exploring crucial research questions. Moreover, in our study, thanks to the secondary data of the European Social Survey, we have had a great advantage in terms of accessing data on hard-to-reach populations, such as NEET youths.

7. Conclusions

The mediation analyses showed that future orientation plays an important role in the psychological process that leads to mitigating the negative effects between unemployment condition and well-being.
This study highlighted the need for career guidance interventions that allow one to plan and deal with the future. It is important to enhance beliefs about future outcomes and positive feelings about pursuing their goals and wishes (Fusco et al. 2022; Ginevra et al. 2016). This way, young people will be more able to imagine multiple possible future scenarios. Career guidance interventions should be oriented to help young people cope with labor market challenges, capturing the specific experience of failure in SWT and the related negative outcomes. Practices guided by the Life Design paradigm (Savickas 2012) appear to be the most useful for mastering career transition (Hartung 2019). LD intervention promotes the freedom of the individual to think about their future (Fusco et al. 2021) and find their way to build a prosperous and sustainable life (De Vos et al. 2020).
In conclusion, the present study could contribute to the ongoing debate concerning the NEET condition, fostering the development of outreach strategies for young NEETs aimed to identify and reach them, intercept their needs, and then make tailored services.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P.; methodology, C.F.; data curation, C.F; formal analysis, A.P. and C.F.; writing, A.P. and C.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Avagianou, Athina, Nikos Kapitsinis, Ioannis Papageorgiou, Anna Hege Strand, and Stelios Gialis. 2022. Being NEET in youthspaces of the EU South: A post-recession regional perspective. Young 30: 11033088221086365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bartelink, Vicky H. M., Kyaw Zay Ya, Karin Guldbrandsson, and Sven Bremberg. 2019. Unemployment among young people and mental health: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 48: 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bjarnason, Thoroddur, and Thordis J. Sigurdardottir. 2003. Psychological distress during unemployment and beyond: Social support and material deprivation among youth in six northern European countries. Social Science & Medicine 56: 973–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Blustein, David L., Ryan Duffy, Joaquim A. Ferreira, Valerie Cohen-Scali, Rachel Gali Cinamon, and Blake A. Allan. 2020. Unemployment in the time of COVID-19: A research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior 119: 103436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bonanomi, Andrea, and Alessandro Rosina. 2022. Employment status and well-being: A longitudinal study on young italian people. Social Indicators Research 161: 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Brannen, Julia, and Ann Nilsen. 2002. Young people’s time perspectives: From youth to adulthood. Sociology 36: 513–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brunetti, Irene, and Lorenzo Corsini. 2019. School-to-work transition and vocational education: A comparison across Europe. International Journal of Manpower 8: 1411–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Buchmann, Marlis C., and Irene Kriesi. 2011. Transition to adulthood in Europe. Annual Review of Sociology 37: 481–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bynner, John, and Samantha Parsons. 2002. Social exclusion and the transition from school to work: The case of young people not in education, employment, or training (NEET). Journal of Vocational Behavior 60: 289–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Crowe, Laura, and Peter Butterworth. 2016. The role of financial hardship, mastery and social support in the association between employment status and depression: Results from an Australian longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open 6: 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dastin, Jeffrey. 2018. Amazon Scraps Secret AI Recruiting Tool That Showed Bias against Women. Boca Raton: Auerbach Publications. [Google Scholar]
  12. De Neve, Jan-Emmanuel, Ed Diener, Louis Tay, and Cody Xuereb. 2013. The Objective Benefits of Subjective Well-Being (August 6, 2013). In World Happiness Report 2013. Edited by John Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey Sachs. New York: UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2306651 (accessed on 1 September 2022).
  13. De Vos, Ans, Beatrice I. J. M. Van der Heijden, and Jos Akkermans. 2020. Sustainable careers: Towards a conceptual model. Journal of Vocational Behavior 117: 103196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. De Witte, Hans. 2005. Job insecurity: Review of the international literature on definitions, prevalence, antecedents and consequences. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology 31: 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Devadason, Ranji. 2008. To plan or not to plan? Young adult future orientations in two European cities. Sociology 42: 1127–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Diener, Ed, Shigehiro Oishi, and Louis Tay. 2018. Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behaviour 2: 253–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Diener, Ed, Derrick Wirtz, William Tov, Chu Kim-Prieto, Dong-won Choi, Shigehiro Oishi, and Robert Biswas-Diener. 2010. New Well-Being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings. Social Indicators Research 97: 143–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dolan, Paul, Tessa Peasgood, and Mathew White. 2008. Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology 29: 94–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Eurofound. 2016. Exploring the Diversity of NEETs. Eurofound. Available online: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/de/publications/report/2016/labour-market-social-policies/exploring-the-diversity-of-neets (accessed on 1 September 2022).
  20. Eurostat. 2022. Statistics on Young People Neither in Employment nor in Education or Training. Statistics Explained. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Statistics_on_young_people_neither_in_employment_nor_in_education_or_training (accessed on 1 September 2022).
  21. Felaco, Cristiano, and Anna Parola. 2020. Young in university-work transition: The views of undergraduates in southern Italy. The Qualitative Report 25: 3129–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ford, Martin. 2015. Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future. New York: Basic Books. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fuchs, Victor R., ed. 1982. Time preference and health: An exploratory study. In Economic Aspects of Health. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 93–120. [Google Scholar]
  24. Fusco, Luca, Anna Parola, and Luigia Simona Sica. 2021. Life design for youth as a creativity-based intervention for transforming a challenging World. Frontiers in Psychology 12: 662072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fusco, Luca, Luigia Simona Sica, Anna Parola, and Laura Aleni Sestito. 2022. Vocational identity flexibility and psychosocial functioning in Italian high school students. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology 10: 144–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gariépy, Geneviève, Sofia M. Danna, Lisa Hawke, Johanna Henderson, and Srividya N. Iyer. 2021. The mental health of young people who are not in education, employment, or training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 57: 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gaspani, Fabio. 2018. Young-adults NEET in Italy: Orientations and strategies toward the future. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 38: 150–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ginevra, Maria Cristina, Susanna Pallini, Giovanni Maria Vecchio, Laura Nota, and Salvatore Soresi. 2016. Future orientation and attitudes mediate career adaptability and decidedness. Journal of Vocational Behavior 95: 102–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Goldman-Mellor, Sidra, Avshalom Caspi, Louise Arseneault, Nifemi Ajala, Antony Ambler, Andrea Danese, Helen Fisher, Abigail Hucker, Candice Odgers, Teresa Williams, and et al. 2016. Committed to work but vulnerable: Self-perceptions and mental health in NEET 18-year olds from a contemporary British cohort. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 57: 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Guthrie, Lori C., Stephen C. Butler, and Michael M. Ward. 2009. Time perspective and socioeconomic status: A link to socioeconomic disparities in health? Social Science & Medicine 68: 2145–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Gutierrez-Garcia, Raúl A., Corina Benjet, Guilherme Borges, Enrique Méndez Rios, and Maria Elena Medina-Mora. 2017. NEET adolescents grown up: Eight-year longitudinal follow-up of education, employment and mental health from adolescence to early adulthood in Mexico City. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 26: 1459–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hartung, Paul J. 2019. Life design: A paradigm for innovating career counselling in global context. In Handbook of Innovative Career Counselling. Cham: Springer, pp. 3–18. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hawkins, Jeff, and Sandra Blakeslee. 2004. On Intelligence. New York: Times Books. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hayes, Andrew F. 2017. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Publications. [Google Scholar]
  35. Iannone, R. 2018. DiagrammeR: Graph/Network Visualization. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DiagrammeR (accessed on 13 September 2022).
  36. International Labor Organization World Employment and Social Outlook—Trends. 2020. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/global/research/global-reports/weso/2020/lang--en/index.htm (accessed on 1 September 2022).
  37. Johnson, Monica Kirkpatrick, Rober Crosnoe, and Glen H. Elder Jr. 2011. Insights on adolescence from a life course perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence 21: 273–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Jongbloed, Janine, and Jean-François Giret. 2022. Quality of life of NEET youth in comparative perspective: Subjective well-being during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Youth Studies 25: 321–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kang, Sonia, Katherine DeCelles, András Tilcsik, and Sora Jun. 2016. Whitened Résumés: Race and self-presentation in the labor market. Administrative Science Quarterly 61: 469–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kooij, Dorien T. A. M., Ruth Kanfer, Matt Betts, and Cort W. Rudolph. 2018. Future Time Perspective: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 103: 867–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kotroyannos, Dimitrios, Kostas A. Lavdas, Nikos Papadakis, Argyris Kyridis, Panagiotis Theodirikakos, Stylianos Ioannis Tzagkarakis, and Maria Drakaki. 2015. An individuality in parenthesis? social vulnerability, youth and the welfare state in crisis: On the case of neets, In Greece, within the European context. Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities 3: 268–79. [Google Scholar]
  42. López-López, José A., Alex S. F. Kwong, Elizabeth Washbrook, Rebecca M. Pearson, Kate Tilling, Mina S. Fazel, Judy Kidger, and Gemma Hammerton. 2019. Trajectories of depressive symptoms and adult educational and employment outcomes. BJPsych Open 6: e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. MacKinnon, David P. 2012. Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  44. Manhica, Helio, Andreas Lundin, and Anna-Karin Danielsson. 2019. Not in education, employment, or training (NEET) and risk of alcohol use disorder: A nationwide register-linkage study with 485 839 Swedish youths. BMJ Open 9: e032888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Mascherini, Massimiliano. 2019. Origins and future of the concept of NEETs in the European policy agenda. In Youth Labor in Transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 503–29. [Google Scholar]
  46. Mohammed, Susan, and Jacqueline T. Marhefka. 2020. How have we, do we, and will we measure time perspective? A review of methodological and measurement issues. Journal of Organizational Behavior 41: 276–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nie, Pen, Wanglin Ma, and Alfonso Sousa-Poza. 2021. The relationship between smartphone use and subjective well-being in rural China. Electronic Commerce Research 21: 983–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nurmi, Jari-Erik. 2005. Thinking about and acting upon the future: Development of future orientation across the life span. In Understanding Behavior in the Context of Time: Theory, Research, and Application. Edited by Alan Stratham and Jeff Joireman. Mahwah: Erlbaum, pp. 31–57. [Google Scholar]
  49. O’Dea, Bridianne, Rico S. C. Lee, Patrick D. McGorry, Ian B. Hickie, Jan Scott, Daniel F. Hermens, Harnestein Mykeltun, Rosemary Purcell, Eoin Killackey, Christos Pantelis, and et al. 2016. A prospective cohort study of depression course, functional disability, and NEET status in help-seeking young adults. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 51: 1395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Parola, Anna, and Lucia Donsì. 2019. Time perspective and employment status: NEET categories as negative predictor of future. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology 7: 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Parola, Anna, and Jenny Marcionetti. 2022. Youth unemployment and health outcomes: The moderation role of the future time perspective. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance 22: 327–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Parola, Anna, Jenny Marcionetti, Luigia Simona Sica, and Lucia Donsì. 2022. The effects of a non-adaptive school-to-work transition on transition to adulthood, time perspective and internalizing and externalizing problems. Current Psychology. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pastore, Francesco. 2019. Why so slow? The school-to-work transition in Italy. Studies in Higher Education 44: 1358–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Pastore, Francesco, Claudio Quintano, and Antonella Rocca. 2022. The duration of the school-to-work transition in Italy and in other European countries: A flexible baseline hazard interpretation. International Journal of Manpower. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Piumatti, Giovanni, Laura Pipitone, Angela Maria Di Vita, Delia Latina, and Emanuela Rabaglietti. 2014. Transition to adulthood across Italy: A comparison between Northern and Southern Italian young adults. Journal of Adult Development 21: 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Power, Emmet, Mary Clarke, Ian Kelleher, Helen Coughlan, Fionnuala Lynch, Dearbhla Connor, Carol Fitzpatrick, Michelle Harley, and Mary Cannon. 2015. The association between economic inactivity and mental health among young people: A longitudinal study of young adults who are not in employment, education or training. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine 32: 155–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Prenda, Kimberly M., and Margie E. Lachman. 2001. Planning for the future: A life management strategy for increasing control and life satisfaction in adulthood. Psychology and Aging 16: 206–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. R Core Team. 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  59. Raffe, David. 2008. The concept of transition system. Journal of Education and Work 21: 277–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Raffe, David. 2014. Explaining national differences in education-work transitions: Twenty years of research on transition systems. European Societies 16: 175–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rodwell, Laura, Helena Romaniuk, Wendy Nilsen, John B. Carlin, KJ Lee, and George Christopher Patton. 2018. Adolescent mental health and behavioural predictors of being NEET: A prospective study of young adults not in employment, education, or training. Psychological Medicine 48: 861–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rosseel, Yves, Terrence D. Jorgensen, Nicholas Rockwood, Daniel Oberski, Jarett Byrnes, Leonard Vanbrabant, Victoria Savalei, Ed Merkle, Michael Hallquist, Mijke Rhemtulla, and et al. 2015. Package “lavaan”: Latent Variable Analysis. Madison: R Package. [Google Scholar]
  63. Rossi, Alessandro Alberto, Maria Marconi, Federica Taccini, Claudio Verusio, and Stefania Mannarini. 2021. From Fear to Hopelessness: The Buffering Effect of Patient-Centered Communication in a Sample of Oncological Patients during COVID-19. Behavioral Sciences 11: 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Savickas, Mark L. 2012. Life design: A paradigm for career intervention in the 21st century. Journal of Counseling & Development 90: 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Schimmack, Ulrich. 2006. Internal and external determinants of subjective well-being: Review and policy implications. In Happiness and Public Policy: Theory, Case Studies and Implications. Edited by Yew-Kwang Ng and Lok Sang Ho. New York: Palgrave McMillan, pp. 67–88. [Google Scholar]
  66. Schnaudt, Christian, Michael Weinhardt, Rory Fitzgerald, and Stefan Liebig. 2014. The European Social Survey: Contents, design, and research potential. Journal of Contextual Economics: Schmollers Jahrbuch 134: 487–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Schoon, Ingrid, and John Bynner, eds. 2017. Young People’s Development and the Great Recession: Uncertain Transitions and Precarious Futures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  68. Schoon, Ingrid, and John Bynner. 2019. Young people and the Great Recession: Variations in the school-to-work transition in Europe and the United States. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies 10: 153–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Seginer, Rachel. 2009. Future Orientation: Developmental and Ecological Perspectives. New York: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  70. Shanahan, Michael J. 2000. Pathways to adulthood in changing societies: Variability and mechanisms in life course perspective. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 667–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Shanahan, Michael J., Jeylan T. Mortimer, and Monica Kirkpatrick-Johnson, eds. 2016. Handbook of the Life Course, Volume II. New York: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  72. Shipp, Abbie J., Jeffrey R. Edwards, and Lisa S. Lambert. 2009. Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 110: 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Singh-Manoux, Archana, and Michael Marmot. 2005. Role of socialization in explaining social inequalities in health. Social Science & Medicine 60: 2129–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Sobol-Kwapinska, Malgorzata, Tomasz Jankowski, and Aneta Przepiorka. 2016. What do we gain by adding time perspective to mindfulness? Carpe Diem and mindfulness in a temporal framework. Personality and Individual Differences 93: 112–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Stea, Tonje H., Eirik Abildsnes, Arve Strandheim, and Siri H. Haugland. 2019. Do young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) have more health problems than their peers? A cross-sectional study among Norwegian adolescents. Norsk Epidemiologi 28: 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sun, Rachel C. F., and Daniel T. Shek. 2012. Beliefs in the future as a positive youth development construct: A conceptual review. The Scientific World Journal. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Sutin, Angelina R., and Paul T. Costa Jr. 2010. Reciprocal influences of personality and job characteristics across middle adulthood. Journal of Personality 78: 257–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Virtanen, Pekka, Anne Hammarström, and Urban Janlert. 2016. Children of boom and recession and the scars to the mental health—A comparative study on the long-term effects of youth unemployment. International Journal for Equity in Health 15: 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Walther, Andreas. 2006. Regimes of youth transitions: Choice, fexibility and security in young people’s experiences across different European contexts. Young 14: 119–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wei, Taiyun, Vilian Simko, Michael Levy, Yihui Xie, Yan Jin, and Jeff Zemla. 2017. Package ‘corrplot’. Statistician 56: e24. [Google Scholar]
  81. Weston, Sara J., Stuart J. Ritchie, Julia M. Rohrer, and Andrew K. Przybylski. 2019. Recommendations for increasing the transparency of analysis of preexisting data sets. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 2: 214–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Zaleski, Zbigniew, Malgorzata Sobol-Kwapinska, Aneta Przepiorka, and Michal Meisner. 2019. Development and validation of the Dark Future scale. Time & Society 28: 107–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zheng, Hongyun, and Wanglin Ma. 2021. Click it and buy happiness: Does online shopping improve subjective well-being of rural residents in China? Applied Economics 53: 4192–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zimbardo, Philip G., and John N. Boyd. 1999. Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable Individual-Differences Metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77: 1271–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zuccotti, Carolina V., and Jacqueline O’Reilly. 2019. Ethnicity, gender and household effects on becoming NEET: An intersectional analysis. Work, Employment and Society 33: 351–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Socsci 11 00482 g001 550
Figure 1. Statistical Diagram.
Figure 1. Statistical Diagram.
Socsci 11 00482 g001
Socsci 11 00482 g002 550
Figure 2. Mediation model.
Figure 2. Mediation model.
Socsci 11 00482 g002
Table
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample (N = 695).
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample (N = 695).
VariableAttributesn (%)/M (SD)Sk./K.
GenderFemale
Male		343 (50.6)
352 (49.4)
Marital statusMarried/civil union
Separated/divorced
None of these		103 (14.9)
9 (1.3)
579 (83.8)
Years of education 13.20 (3.383)0.314/0.118
Age 24.72 (5.931)0.105/−1.156
Employment conditionNon-NEET
NEET		153 (22.2)
535 (77.8)
Income sourceEmployment
Others
None		276 (43.6)
19 (3.7)
319 (52.7)
Residence areaLarge cities and
surroundings
Medium cities and towns
Countryside		129 (18.6)

237 (34.2)
326 (47.1)
M = mean; SD = standard deviation; Sk. = skewness; K. = kurtosis.
Table
Table 2. Descriptive analyses, t-test, and effect sizes for NEET group and non-NEET group.
Table 2. Descriptive analyses, t-test, and effect sizes for NEET group and non-NEET group.
Non-NEETNEETt-Test
M (SD)
[95% CI]		M (SD)
[95% CI]		T(df)95% CIgSk./K.
Well-being7.496 (1.400)
[7.376,7.610]		6.778 (1.992)
[6.458,7.082]		5.050 *
(685)		[0.439,0.998]0.417−1.027/
1.585
Future orientation4.58 (2.696)
[4.36,4.81]		5.58 (2.939)
[5.12,6.05]		−3.975 *
(685)		[0.379,1.058]0.4650.214/
−0.737
M = mean; SD = standard deviation; 95% CI = confidence interval at 95%; df = degrees of freedom; g = Hedge’s g; * p < 0.001; Sk. = skewness; K. = kurtosis.
Table
Table 3. Direct and indirect effects of employment condition on subjective well-being via future orientation.
Table 3. Direct and indirect effects of employment condition on subjective well-being via future orientation.
Bse95% CI[L-U]
Path a1.0030.252[0.508; 1.495]
Path b−0.0530.021[−0.095; −0.011]
Path c’−0.6650.143[−0.947; −0.384]
Indirect effect−0.0530.029[−0.116; −0.005]
B = unstandardized regression coefficient, se = standard error; 95% CI = confidence interval at 95%.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Felaco, C.; Parola, A. Subjective Well-Being and Future Orientation of NEETs: Evidence from the Italian Sample of the European Social Survey. Soc. Sci. 2022, 11, 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100482

AMA Style

Felaco C, Parola A. Subjective Well-Being and Future Orientation of NEETs: Evidence from the Italian Sample of the European Social Survey. Social Sciences. 2022; 11(10):482. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100482

Chicago/Turabian Style

Felaco, Cristiano, and Anna Parola. 2022. "Subjective Well-Being and Future Orientation of NEETs: Evidence from the Italian Sample of the European Social Survey" Social Sciences 11, no. 10: 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100482

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop