Next Article in Journal
Investigating the Influence of Age-Friendly Community Infrastructure Facilities on the Health of the Elderly in China
Previous Article in Journal
Sewage Sludge Valorization for Collapsible Soil Improvement
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

A Narrative Literature Review Using Placemaking Theories to Unravel Student Social Connectedness in Hybrid University Learning Environments

Buildings 2023, 13(2), 339; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020339
by Theresa Wheele 1,2,*, Clara Weber 2,3,*, Lukas Windlinger 1, Tore Haugen 2 and Carmel Lindkvist 2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Buildings 2023, 13(2), 339; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020339
Submission received: 28 December 2022 / Revised: 19 January 2023 / Accepted: 20 January 2023 / Published: 24 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Architectural Design, Urban Science, and Real Estate)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1The paper is very well written and straight to the point.  Please pay attention to these two minor corrections.

11. Please discuss the theoretical and practical implications of the findings in detail.

   2. State the key limitations and make recommendations for further studies.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The review is very comprehensive and worth sharing in published journal paper.

However, you may improve the paper by providing summary in the form of diagram for each major sections. Although it has been mentioned that the paper is narrative in nature, but having intermittent diagrams may help audience to keep engaged with the narration.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This work details a literature review in an admirable attempt to develop a theory about Placemaking in university hybrid classes/spaces. This topic should be of great interest to anyone interested in helping students develop a sense of place in what has become "normal" digital learning spaces.

I appreciate the academic orientation and language of the manuscript but found myself wanting to know a bit more about previous strategies that worked (and more importantly did not work). While this might be the topic of a future publication, it would still be nice to have the authors provide the two most positively impactful practices (and or negative ones). That might also help the authors form a group of interested faculty to help gather empirical information for further studies.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop