Next Article in Journal
Effect of Alcohol on the Mechanical and Electrical Properties of Ultrasonic Spot Welded Cu/Cu Joints
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanism of Selective Chlorination of Fe from Fe2SiO4 and FeV2O4 Based on Density Functional Theory
Previous Article in Journal
Quality Diagnostics of Parts Produced by Combined Additive Manufacturing Technology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Technology for Complex Processing of Electric Smelting Dusts of Ilmenite Concentrates to Produce Titanium Dioxide and Amorphous Silica
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improved Process for Separating TiO2 from an Oxalic-Acid Hydrothermal Leachate of Vanadium Slag

1
State Key Laboratory of Vanadium and Titanium Resources Comprehensive Utilization, Panzhihua 617000, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Metallurgy, Beijing 100083, China
3
School of Metallurgical and Ecological Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2023, 13(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/met13010020
Submission received: 29 November 2022 / Revised: 18 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 December 2022 / Published: 22 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metal Recovery and Separation from Wastes)

Abstract

:
In the present study, a process of separating high-quality TiO2 from an oxalic-acid leachate of vanadium slag was proposed. It consists of two steps; oxalic acid was firstly recovered from the leachate by the cooling-crystallization method, and subsequently TiO2 was separated from the oxalic-acid recovered leachate by the hydrothermal precipitation method. The experimental results indicate that oxalic acid can be recovered from the leachate by cooling crystallization at 5 °C, and after the recovery of oxalic acid, the purity of final TiO2 product can also be improved. For example, when the leachate was cooled directly at 5 °C for 5 h, about 7% of oxalic acid was recovered, and the purity of final TiO2 product improved from 95.7% to 96.6%. Furthermore, it was found that when some HCl solution was added to the leachate, both the recovery percentage of oxalic acid and the purity of TiO2 product increased. For instance, when 15 vol% of HCl solution relative to pregnant leachate was added, about 35% oxalic acid was recovered by cooling crystallization at 5 °C for 3 h, and the anatase TiO2 product with a purity of 99.2% was obtained by hydrothermal precipitation at 140 °C for 2.5 h.

1. Introduction

Vanadium titanomagnetite (VTM) ore is an important deposit, not only for its plenty reserves of vanadium, titanium, chromium, and iron but also for its globally abundant distribution in countries such as Russia, China, South Africa, New Zealand, Canada, and Australia [1,2]. In the VTM deposit, the principal oxide minerals are titanomagnetite (Fe3−xTixO4) and ilmenite (FeTiO3). In titanomagnetite, a small amount of vanadium and chromium exist simultaneously by substituting titanium [3]. After the beneficiation process of VTM, the obtained titanomagnetite concentrate is used as feedstock for iron-making, and ilmenite concentrate is used for producing titanium dioxide [4,5].
The titanomagnetite concentrate is generally smelted through the traditional blast furnace process, and liquid iron containing vanadium, titanium, and chromium is produced [4,6,7]. Then, to recover the vanadium that is reduced and dissolved in the liquid iron during the blast furnace smelting process, the liquid iron is blown in an oxygen-converter, which produces the vanadium, titanium, chromium, and some impurities, and some iron was oxidized to form a by-product called vanadium slag [8,9,10]. Although this by-product is generally called vanadium slag, a considerable amount of titanium and chromium is also contained in this it beside vanadium [11]. Typically, apart from 10~19% V2O3, 7~14% TiO2 and 0.9~5% Cr2O3 exist in vanadium slag simultaneously. However, traditionally, vanadium slag was just adopted as a feedstock for vanadium production, and no more attention was paid to the recovery of titanium and chromium from vanadium slag.
Sodium salt roasting-water leaching and calcification roasting-acid leaching are the most common processes for vanadium production from vanadium slag [12,13,14]. In the sodium-salt-roasting–water-leaching process, the vanadium slag is roasted in an air atmosphere with the addition of sodium salt (one or a combination of NaCl, Na2CO3, or Na2SO4) to transform trivalent vanadium that occurs in vanadium slag in water-soluble sodium vanadate, and vanadium pentoxide is prepared by the following water-leaching, purification, precipitation, and calcination steps [12,15]. In the calcification roasting-acid leaching process, other than sodium salt, lime or limestone is used as an additive, and the trivalent vanadium that occurs in vanadium slag is transformed into acid-soluble calcium vanadate through roasting step and then leached by sulfuric acid [16,17]. No matter which of these two processes is adopted, only the vanadium that occurs in vanadium slag can be extracted. The valuable components of titanium and chromium that occur in vanadium slag are left in the residues, which causes not only an enormous waste of resources but also potential risk to the environment [18,19,20].
To solve the problems mentioned above, a novel approach to the co-extraction of vanadium, titanium, and chromium from vanadium slag was proposed in our previous publications [21,22]. The processes of co-extraction are as follows: firstly, the vanadium slag without roasting is directly hydrothermally leached by an oxalic-acid solution, by which the trivalent vanadium ion, tetravalent titanium ion, and trivalent chromium ion that occur in vanadium slag are simultaneously leached out; next, the separations of titanium oxide, vanadium oxide, and chromium oxide from the pregnant leachate are achieved through hydrothermal precipitation at temperatures higher than leaching. Based on this novel approach, the direct leaching coefficients of vanadium, titanium, and chromium in vanadium slag can reach 97.9%, 98.6%, and 93.3%, respectively, under the conditions of a temperature of 125 °C, an oxalic acid concentration of 25%, a liquid-to-solid mass ratio of 8:1, a reaction time of 90 min, the iron powder addition of 3.2%, and a stirring speed of 500 r/min. Additionally, a product of spherical anatase TiO2 with a purity of 95.7% can be separated hydrothermally from the leachate after precipitation at 150 °C for 2.5 h [23].
This novel hydrothermal leaching and separation process is efficient and clean for the co-extraction of vanadium, titanium, and chromium from vanadium slag and for separating titanium oxide. However, two problems still need to be solved. One is that the consumption of oxalic acid needs to be reduced due to the relatively high price of oxalic acid. The other is that the quality or purity of the TiO2 product need be improved. To these ends, in this study, a route of the cooling crystallization of oxalic acid from the leachate followed by the hydrothermal precipitation of TiO2 was proposed and attempted. Unexpectedly, it was found that the cooling crystallization method was not only effective in recovering oxalic acid from the leachate but favorable for improving the purity of the TiO2 product. So, after the effectiveness of the route was confirmed, the factors, such as acidity, temperature, etc., on the recovery extent of oxalic acid and quality of TiO2 product were investigated systematically. Finally, an improved process of recovering oxalic acid and producing high-quality TiO2 was presented.

2. Experimental

2.1. Co-Extraction of Vanadium, Titanium, and Chromium from Vanadium Slag

The detailed procedure for co-extraction can be found in previous publications [21,22]. For the sake of brevity, only the primary steps are narrated here. The used vanadium slag is analyzed by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF-1800, Shimadzu Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) and characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, MAC Science Co. Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan). The results indicated that it is composed of 10.61% V2O5, 8.65% TiO2, 4.38% Cr2O3, 43.51% Fe2O3, 10.61% SiO2, 7.98% MnO, 3.32% CaO, 3.08% MgO, and 1.64% Al2O3, and it is mainly constituted of spinel, olivine, and pyroxene mineral phases. About 1.25 g of vanadium slag, 0.04 g of iron powder, 10 g of distilled water, and 3.33 g of oxalic acid were placed into an autoclave of 50 mL; then, the leaching reaction was carried out at 125 °C for 90 min with a stirring rate of 500 r/min. After hydrothermal leaching reaction, the reacted mixture was filtered and a pregnant leachate was obtained. This obtained pregnant leachate was used as the raw solution for recovery of oxalic acid and the separation of TiO2. Its composition was determined by ICP optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES, OPTIMA 7000DV, Waltham, MA, USA), and the results are presented in Table 1.

2.2. Recovery of Oxalic Acid from Leachate through Cooling Crystallization

About 20 mL of pregnant leachate was placed into a glass beaker; then, the beaker was placed into a thermoelectric cooling cup, which can hold the temperature constant at 5 °C. When the leachate was cooled for 20 min, about 0.02 g of oxalic acid was added as seed crystal. Thereafter, the leachate was stirred once every 10 min to make the temperature homogeneous.
In order to evaluate the recovery extent of oxalic acid, a tiny amount of leachate was taken out using a pipette during the cooling process at setting time intervals to track the change of oxalate concentration. The concentration of oxalate was measured by ion chromatography. Then, the percentage of recovery of oxalic acid was calculated according to Equation (1).
β = ( 1 C t C 0 ) × 100 %
where β denotes the recovery fraction of oxalic acid, and C t and C 0 signify the concentration of oxalate in leachate at the sampling time and the initial time, respectively.

2.3. Separation of TiO2 from Oxalic-Acid Recovered Leachate

After a cooling crystallization reaction, the crystalized solid was filtered out. The filtered solid was identified by XRD, and its composition was measured by ICP-OES. The obtained filtrate, which is referred to as oxalic-acid recovered leachate in the following text, was further used for the separation of TiO2.
About 15 mL of oxalic-acid recovered leachate was placed into a 50 mL autoclave to perform the hydrothermal precipitation reaction for 2.5 h. Additionally, the hydrothermal temperature, as well as the property of the oxalic-acid recovered leachate, were changed to investigate their effects on the precipitation extent and purity of TiO2.
After precipitation reaction, the precipitate was filtered out. Then, XRD measurement was performed to identify its phase structure, ICP-OES measurements were carried out to determine the impurity and the purity of the product, and SEM measurements were adopted to characterize the morphology of the product.
To determine the hydrothermal precipitation fraction of titanium from the oxalic-acid recovered leachate, the concentration of titanium in oxalic-acid recovered leachate, C T i , i , and the concentration of titanium in the filtrate after hydrothermal precipitation reaction, C T i , f , were measured by ICP-OES. Then, the precipitation fraction of titanium, η , was calculated according to Equation (2).
η = ( 1 C T i , f C T i , i ) × 100 %

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Practicability of the Design for Recovery of Oxalic Acid and Separation of TiO2

The design of this study consists of two steps; one is to recover oxalic acid from the pregnant leachate through the cooling crystallization method, the following is to separate TiO2 from the oxalic-acid recovered leachate by the hydrothermal precipitation method. So, first of all, the feasibility of the whole design was confirmed.
To perform the confirmation, the pregnant leachate with a composition shown in Table 1 was directly cooled to 5 °C and held for 5 h; then, the crystalized precipitate was filtered out and identified by XRD measurement. The measured XRD pattern is shown in Figure 1, from which it can be seen that the obtained precipitate is the well crystalized oxalic acid phase.
To further estimate the purity of the obtained oxalic acid phase, it was analyzed by ICP-OES. The contents of the main impurities are shown in Table 2. From the contents of impurities, the purity of the crystalized oxalic acid can be estimated to be higher than 99%.
In the following step, the oxalic-acid recovered leachate was directly used for separating TiO2 by hydrothermal precipitation method. The sample was heated to 140 °C in autoclave and held for 2.5 h; then, the sample was filtered. The solid phase filtered out was identified by XRD, and its composition was determined by ICP-OES.
Figure 2 shows the measured XRD pattern. By comparison with the standard pattern of anatase TiO2 shown together in Figure 2, it can be seen that the obtained solid product is single-phase TiO2 with an anatase structure. The composition of the product measured by ICP-OES is shown in Table 3, which indicates that the purity of the product is acceptable.
To evaluate the effect of recovering oxalic acid on the quality of the obtained TiO2 product, our previous reported results were adopted as a reference for comparison. In our previous study [23], the pregnant leachate without the recovery of oxalic acid was used as a raw material of hydrothermal precipitation. The composition of the obtained TiO2 product, as shown in Table 4, is cited.
By comparing the composition in Table 3 with that in Table 4, it can be seen that the purity of TiO2 is improved slightly. Especially, the contents of V2O5 and Cr2O3 impurities can be reduced through recovering oxalic acid from the pregnant leachate.
The above results indicate that not only is the design of the present study feasible, it is also favorable for improving quality of the TiO2 product.

3.2. Optimization of the Oxalic-Acid Recovering Process

Now that oxalic acid can be recovered from the pregnant leachate by the cooling crystallization method, the more effective conditions for recovering oxalic acid need to be further investigated. We know that oxalic acid is a weak acid; four species (H+, H2C2O4, HC2O4 and C2O42−) exist in its aqueous solution. Inspecting the chemical reactions among these species, it can be concluded easily that increasing the concentration of H+ will definitely cause an increase in H2C2O4 content. The effect was calculated according to their chemical equilibrium reactions, and the results are shown graphically in Figure 3.
From Figure 3, it can be seen clearly that the content of the H2C2O4 molecule increases significantly when the pH value is less than 2. This increase in content for the H2C2O4 molecule will promote its crystallization and precipitation. Hence, by adding HCl solution into pregnant leachate to change its pH value, the effect of acidity on the percentage of recovery of oxalic acid was studied.
A HCl solution with a concentration of 36.64% was used as the additive, and three different adding amounts 5 vol%, 10 vol%, and 15 vol% relative to the pregnant leachate were investigated for comparison. After adding HCl solution, the pregnant leachate was placed into a cooling cup of 5 °C. At various time intervals, sampling was carried out to monitor the change of oxalate concentration in pregnant leachate, and the percentage of recovery of oxalic acid by cooling crystallization was calculated. The obtained results at various conditions are exhibited in Figure 4.
From the results shown in Figure 4, it can be found that, compared with the case without adding HCl, both the extent and the rate of recovery of oxalic acid increased sharply. When 15 vol% HCl was added, the percentage of recovery reached about 35% after cooling crystallization for 5 h, which is about seven times higher than no adding of HCl and about two times higher than the case of adding 5 vol% HCl. Concerning the rate of recovery, the recovery fraction reached nearly to the maximum after 1 h when 15 vol% HCl was added, whereas 3 h was need to reach the maximum when 10 vol% HCl was added. Hence, from the perspective of recovering oxalic acid, adding 15 vol% is favorable for improving the recovery efficiency.

3.3. Optimization of the TiO2 Separating Process

By adding HCl solution, the recovery fraction of oxalic acid can be improved significantly. Then, the effect of the added HCl on the following step, i.e., the hydrothermal precipitation of TiO2, needs to be evaluated. So, the effects on hydrothermal temperature, precipitation extent, and the quality of produced TiO2 were investigated.
About 15 mL leachate of oxalic acid recovered was placed into a 50 mL autoclave and then heated and held at different temperatures of 120 °C, 130 °C, 140 °C, and 150 °C, respectively, for 2.5 h. After hydrothermal precipitation, the filtered solid was identified by XRD and analyzed by ICP-OES to determine the contents of impurities, while the filtrate was also analyzed by ICP-OES to measure the content of Ti to determine the precipitation extent.
In Figure 5, the effects of the added amount of HCl solution, as well as the hydrothermal temperature, on the precipitation fractions of TiO2 are presented. By comparing the results shown in Figure 5 with the case of no HCl added, it can be found that by adding HCl, the precipitating temperature can be lowered significantly. For example, without adding HCl, almost no TiO2 was precipitated at 120 °C, whereas when 5 vol% HCl solution was added, the precipitation fraction of TiO2 was already higher than 90% at 120 °C, reaching 96.5% at 130 °C, and was close to the complete extent at 140 °C. However, with the further addition of HCl, this positive effect on the precipitating temperature will deteriorate firstly and then resume gradually. As 10 vol% HCl solution was added, the precipitation fractions of TiO2 at all temperatures were less than the 5 vol% HCl solution added case; then, when 15 vol% HCl solution was added, the degraded precipitation fraction showed a recovering trend. This change of precipitation extent of TiO2 implies that the adding of HCl causes the change of occurrence state of species in solution, which needs to be elucidated deeply in the future work.
Since the hydrothermal precipitation extent at 140 °C for each case is relatively high and acceptable, the precipitates obtained at this temperature were used to characterize the quality of the product. Firstly, their phase structures were identified by XRD; the measured patterns are shown in Figure 6. It can be seen that the adding of HCl has almost no effect on the structure and crystallinity of the product. Although the crystallinity of the products is not perfect, they can be easily identified as anatase TiO2 through comparison with standard pattern.
The contents of impurities in the products measured by ICP-OES are summarized in Table 5, where the contents for TiO2 were calculated by subtracting all impurities. As can be seen, the purity of the product increases gradually when more HCl is added. When 15 vol% HCl solution was added, a product with TiO2 content higher than 99% was obtained.
To provide an overview of the effect of added HCl on the contents of impurities, their changing trend with an increasing amount of added HCl is summarized in Figure 7. It can be seen that, apart from MgO and Cr2O3, the content of the other impurities can be suppressed to some extent through adding HCl. Especially, the impurities V2O5, Al2O3, and MnO can be eliminated effectively.
To further inspect the effect of added HCl on the micromorphology of hydrothermal product, the products of various HCl adding amounts were observed through SEM, and the typical micrographics of the products are shown in Figure 8. It can be seen that both the particle size and the morphology of the product were altered significantly after HCl was added to the pregnant leachate. The possible reason may be adding HCl can promote the recovery of oxalic acid and subsequently cause a remarkable decrease in oxalate concentration in solution. With the decrease in the oxalate concentration, the decomposing temperature for the complex of Ti ions and oxalate may be lowered, which will ultimately influence the hydrothermal precipitating extent as well as the morphology of the product.

4. Conclusions

As one of a series of studies about the clean and efficient utilization of vanadium slag, this study is concerned with the processing of a Ti-bearing oxalic acid hydrothermal leachate of vanadium slag. From an economic point of view, a process of first recovering part of the oxalic acid from the pregnant leachate by the cooling crystallization method and then separating TiO2 by the hydrothermal precipitation method was designed. The experimental results confirmed that this process is not only feasible but also favorable for improving the quality of the separated TiO2 product. Then, an optimization of the process was carried out, and the obtained results are as follows:
(1)
Adding some HCl to the pregnant leachate can further improve the recovery extent and rate of oxalic acid. When 15 vol% HCl was added, the recovery percent of oxalic acid reached about 35% after cooling crystallization at 5 °C for 3 h, which is about seven times higher than the recovery percent when not adding HCl and about two times higher than the recovery percent when adding 5 vol% HCl.
(2)
The adding of HCl in the pregnant leachate does not result in negative effects on the hydrothermal precipitation of TiO2 from the leachate. Additionally, it helps to ameliorate the quality of the precipitated TiO2. When 15 vol% HCl was added, the TiO2 product with a purity higher than 99.2% was obtained.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization Q.M. and M.L.; methodology, G.G.; formal analysis, W.Z.; draft preparation J.Z.; funding acquisition, project administration, B.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China grant number 52174274 and the State Key Laboratory of Vanadium and Titanium Resources Comprehensive Utilization grant number 2021P4FZG01A.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, W.; Fu, G.; Chu, M.S. An effective and cleaner process to recovery iron, titanium, vanadium, and chromium from Hongge vanadium titanomagnetite with hydrogen-rich gases. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2021, 48, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, W.; Fu, G.; Chu, M.S. Reduction kinetics of hongge vanadium titanomagnetite-oxidized pellet with simulated shaft furnace gases. Steel Res. Int. 2017, 88, 1600228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rorie, G.; Aleksandar, N. The extraction of vanadium from titanomagnetites and other sources. Miner. Eng. 2020, 146, 106106. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sun, H.Y.; Wang, J.S.; Han, Y.H. Reduction mechanism of titanomagnetite concentrate by hydrogen. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2013, 125, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kushnarev, A.V.; Mironov, K.V.; Zagainov, S.A. Improvement in vanadium-containing titanomagnetite processing technology. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 996, 012062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tang, W.D.; Yang, S.T.; Xue, X.X. Effect of Titanium on the Smelting Process of Chromium-Bearing Vanadium Titanomagnetite Pellets. JOM 2021, 73, 1362–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, S.; Guo, Y.F.; Zheng, F.Q. Behavior of vanadium during reduction and smelting of vanadium titanomagnetite metallized pellets. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2020, 30, 1687–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Smirnov, L.A.; Kushnarev, A.V.; Fomichev, M.S. Oxygen-converter processing of vanadium-bearing hot metal. Steel Transl. 2013, 43, 587–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Goncharov, K.V.; Agamirova, A.S.; Olyunina, T.V. Reduction Roasting of a Titanomagnetite Concentrate with the Formation of a Titanium–Vanadium Slag Suitable for the Subsequent Recovery of Vanadium and Titanium. Russ. Metall. 2022, 2022, 707–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiao, K.X.; Chen, C.L.; Zhang, J.L. Analysis of titanium distribution behaviour in vanadium-containing titanomagnetite smelting blast furnace. Can. Metall. Q. 2018, 57, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Smirnov, L.A.; Rovnushkin, V.A.; Smirnov, A.L. Conversion of vanadium hot metal in a flux-free converter process. Steel Transl. 2015, 45, 356–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, M.; Xiao, L.; Liu, J.J. Effective Extraction of Vanadium and Chromium from High Chromium Content Vanadium Slag by Sodium Roasting and Water Leaching. Mater. Sci. Forum 2016, 863, 144–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gao, F.; Du, H.; Wang, S.N. A Comparative Study of Extracting Vanadium from Vanadium Titano-Magnetite Ores: Calcium Salt Roasting Vs Sodium Salt Roasting. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2022, 43, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, J.H.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, L. Mechanism of vanadium slag roasting with calcium oxide. Int. J. Min-Eral Process. 2015, 138, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wen, J.; Jiang, T.; Liu, Y. Extraction behavior of vanadium and chromium by calcification roasting-acid leaching from high chromium vanadium slag: Optimization using response surface methodology. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2019, 40, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wen, J.; Jiang, T.; Wang, J.P. Cleaner extraction of vanadium from vanadium-chromium slag based on MnO2 roasting and manganese recycle. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 261, 121205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, T.A.; Dreisinger, D.; Lv, C.; Lv, G.; Zhang, W. Recovery of vanadium from calcification roasted-acid leaching tailing by enhanced acid leaching. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 369, 632–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, H.Y.; Wang, C.J.; Yuan, Y.H. Magnesiation roasting-acid leaching: A zero-discharge method for vanadium extraction from vanadium slag. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 260, 121091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, D.S.; Zhao, L.S.; Liu, Y.H. A novel process for recovery of iron, titanium, and vanadium from titanomagnetite concentrates: NaOH molten salt roasting and water leaching processes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 244, 588–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, J.C.; Kurniawan; Kim, E.Y. A review on the metallurgical recycling of vanadium from slags: Towards a sustainable vanadium production. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 12, 343–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dong, Z.H.; Zhang, J.; Yan, B.J. Co-extraction of vanadium titanium and chromium from vanadium slag by oxalic acid hydrothermal leaching with synergy of Fe powder. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2021, 52, 3961–3969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dong, Z.H.; Zhang, J.; Yan, B.J. A new approach for the comprehensive utilization of vanadium slag. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2022, 53, 2198–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dong, Z.H.; Zhang, J.; Yan, B.J. Hydrothermal separation of titanium vanadium and chromium from a pregnant oxalic acid leachate. Materials 2022, 15, 1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. XRD pattern of the precipitate by cooling crystallization.
Figure 1. XRD pattern of the precipitate by cooling crystallization.
Metals 13 00020 g001
Figure 2. XRD pattern of the precipitate by hydrothermal precipitation.
Figure 2. XRD pattern of the precipitate by hydrothermal precipitation.
Metals 13 00020 g002
Figure 3. Effect of pH value on the distribution of various species in oxalic acid solution.
Figure 3. Effect of pH value on the distribution of various species in oxalic acid solution.
Metals 13 00020 g003
Figure 4. Recovery extent of oxalic acid at various HCl adding conditions.
Figure 4. Recovery extent of oxalic acid at various HCl adding conditions.
Metals 13 00020 g004
Figure 5. Effects of added HCl on the hydrothermal precipitation extent of TiO2.
Figure 5. Effects of added HCl on the hydrothermal precipitation extent of TiO2.
Metals 13 00020 g005
Figure 6. XRD patterns of the hydrothermal product obtained at 140 °C.
Figure 6. XRD patterns of the hydrothermal product obtained at 140 °C.
Metals 13 00020 g006
Figure 7. Effect of added HCl on the changing trend of impurities in TiO2 product.
Figure 7. Effect of added HCl on the changing trend of impurities in TiO2 product.
Metals 13 00020 g007
Figure 8. Effect of added HCl on the changing trend of impurities in TiO2 product.
Figure 8. Effect of added HCl on the changing trend of impurities in TiO2 product.
Metals 13 00020 g008
Table 1. Chemical composition of the pregnant leachate (g/L).
Table 1. Chemical composition of the pregnant leachate (g/L).
ElementsVTiCrFeMnSiCaMgAl
Concentration (g/L)2.422.301.140.310.790.470.420.290.35
Table 2. Contents of main impurities in the crystalized oxalic acid phase.
Table 2. Contents of main impurities in the crystalized oxalic acid phase.
ElementsFeCaSiOthers
Content (wt. %)0.030.020.06trace
Table 3. Composition of the product of hydrothermal precipitation.
Table 3. Composition of the product of hydrothermal precipitation.
ComponentsTiO2V2O5Cr2O3Fe2O3MnOSiO2CaOMgOAl2O3
Content (wt. %)96.61.080.010.290.221.190.240.050.26
The content of TiO2 was obtained by subtracting the contents of impurities.
Table 4. Composition of the TiO2 product in previous study [23].
Table 4. Composition of the TiO2 product in previous study [23].
ComponentsTiO2V2O5Cr2O3Fe2O3MnOSiO2CaOMgOAl2O3
Content (wt. %)95.72.440.100.240.151.270.040.03<0.01
The content of TiO2 was obtained by subtracting the contents of impurities.
Table 5. Compositions of hydrothermal precipitation product at 140 °C (wt. %).
Table 5. Compositions of hydrothermal precipitation product at 140 °C (wt. %).
SampleTiO2V2O5Cr2O3Fe2O3MnOSiO2CaOMgOAl2O3
No HCl added96.61.080.010.290.221.190.240.050.26
5 vol% HCl added96.40.090.060.10.042.810.290.030.11
10 vol% HCl added98.10.080.030.10.021.370.150.030.04
15 vol% HCl added99.20.070.030.10.010.360.110.040.03
The content of TiO2 was obtained by subtracting the contents of impurities.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Miao, Q.; Li, M.; Gao, G.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, J.; Yan, B. Improved Process for Separating TiO2 from an Oxalic-Acid Hydrothermal Leachate of Vanadium Slag. Metals 2023, 13, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13010020

AMA Style

Miao Q, Li M, Gao G, Zhang W, Zhang J, Yan B. Improved Process for Separating TiO2 from an Oxalic-Acid Hydrothermal Leachate of Vanadium Slag. Metals. 2023; 13(1):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13010020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miao, Qingdong, Ming Li, Guanjin Gao, Wenbo Zhang, Jie Zhang, and Baijun Yan. 2023. "Improved Process for Separating TiO2 from an Oxalic-Acid Hydrothermal Leachate of Vanadium Slag" Metals 13, no. 1: 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13010020

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop